Word order noun phrases

word order in english sentences

Welcome to the ELB Guide to English Word Order and Sentence Structure. This article provides a complete introduction to sentence structure, parts of speech and different sentence types, adapted from the bestselling grammar guide, Word Order in English Sentences. I’ve prepared this in conjunction with a short 3-video course, currently in editing, to help share the lessons of the book to a wider audience.

You can use the headings below to quickly navigate the topics:

  • Different Ways to Analyse English Structure
  • Subject-Verb-Object: Sentence Patterns 
  • Adding Additional Information: Objects, Prepositional Phrases and Time
  • Alternative Sentence Patterns: Different Sentence Types
  • Parts of Speech
    • Nouns, Determiners and Adjectives
    • Pronouns
    • Verbs
    • Phrasal Verbs
    • Adverbs
    • Prepositions
    • Conjunctions
    • Interjections
  • Clauses, Simple, Compound and Complex Sentences
    • Simple Sentences
    • Compound Sentences
    • Complex Sentences 

Different Ways to Analyse English Structure

There are lots of ways to break down sentences, for different purposes. This article covers the systems I’ve found help my students understand and form accurate sentences, but note these are not the only ways to explore English grammar.

I take three approaches to introducing English grammar:

  • Studying overall patterns, grouping sentence components by their broad function (subject, verb, object, etc.)
  • Studying different word types (the parts of speech), how their phrases are formed and their places in sentences
  • Studying groupings of phrases and clauses, and how they connect in simple, compound and complex sentences

Subject-Verb-Object: Sentence Patterns

English belongs to a group of just under half the world’s languages which follows a SUBJECT – VERB – OBJECT order. This is the starting point for all our basic clauses (groups of words that form a complete grammatical idea). A standard declarative clause should include, in this order:

  • Subject – who or what is doing the action (or has a condition demonstrated, for state verbs), e.g. a man, the church, two beagles
  • Verb – what is done or what condition is discussed, e.g. to do, to talk, to be, to feel
  • Additional information – everything else!

In the correct order, a subject and verb can communicate ideas with immediate sense with as little as two or three words.

  • Gemma studies.
  • It is hot.

Why does this order matter? We know what the grammatical units are because of their position in the sentence. We give words their position based on the function we want them to convey. If we change the order, we change the functioning of the sentence.

  • Studies Gemma
  • Hot is it

With the verb first, these ideas don’t make immediate sense and, depending on the verbs, may suggest to English speakers a subject is missing or a question is being formed with missing components.

  • The alien studies Gemma. (uh oh!)
  • Hot, is it? (a tag question)

If we don’t take those extra steps to complete the idea, though, the reversed order doesn’t work. With “studies Gemma”, we couldn’t easily say if we’re missing a subject, if studies is a verb or noun, or if it’s merely the wrong order.

The point being: using expected patterns immediately communicates what we want to say, without confusion.

Adding Additional Information: Objects, Prepositional Phrases and Time

Understanding this basic pattern is useful for when we start breaking down more complicated sentences; you might have longer phrases in place of the subject or verb, but they should still use this order.

Subject Verb
Gemma studies.
A group of happy people have been quickly walking.

After subjects and verbs, we can follow with different information. The other key components of sentence patterns are:

  • Direct Object: directly affected by the verb (comes after verb)
  • Indirect Objects: indirectly affected by the verb (typically comes between the verb and a direct object)
  • Prepositional phrases: noun phrases providing extra information connected by prepositions, usually following any objects
  • Time: describing when, usually coming last
Subject Verb Indirect Object Direct Object Preposition Phrase Time
Gemma studied English in the library last week.
Harold gave his friend a new book for her birthday yesterday.

The individual grammatical components can get more complicated, but that basic pattern stays the same.

Subject Verb Indirect Object Direct Object Preposition Phrase Time
Our favourite student Gemma has been studying the structure of English in the massive new library for what feels like eons.
Harold the butcher’s son will have given the daughter of the clockmaker an expensive new book for her coming-of-age festival by this time next week.

The phrases making up each grammatical unit follow their own, more specific rules for ordering words (covered below), but overall continue to fit into this same basic order of components:

Subject – Verb – Indirect Object – Direct Object – Prepositional Phrase – Time

Alternative Sentence Patterns: Different Sentence Types

Subject-Verb-Object is a starting point that covers positive, declarative sentences. These are the most common clauses in English, used to describe factual events/conditions. The type of verb can also make a difference to these patterns, as we have action/doing verbs (for activities/events) and linking/being verbs (for conditions/states/feelings).

Here’s the basic patterns we’ve already looked at:

  • Subject + Action Verb – Gemma studies.
  • Subject + Action Verb + Object – Gemma studies English.
  • Subject + Action Verb + Indirect Object + Direct Object – Gemma gave Paul a book.

We might also complete a sentence with an adverb, instead of an object:

  • Subject + Action Verb + Adverb – Gemma studies hard.

When we use linking verbs for states, senses, conditions, and other occurrences, the verb is followed by noun or adjective phrases which define the subject.

  • Subject + Linking Verb + Noun Phrase – Gemma is a student.
  • Subject + Linking Verb + Adjective Phrase – Gemma is very wise.

These patterns all form positive, declarative sentences. Another pattern to note is Questions, or interrogative sentences, where the first verb comes before the subject. This is done by adding an auxiliary verb (do/did) for the past simple and present simple, or moving the auxiliary verb forward if we already have one (to be for continuous tense, or to have for perfect tenses, or the modal verbs):

  • Gemma studies English. –> Does Gemma study English?
  • Gemma is very wise. –> Is Gemma very wise?

For more information on questions, see the section on verbs.

Finally, we can also form imperative sentences, when giving commands, which do not need a subject.

  • Study English!

(Note it is also possible to form exclamatory sentences, which express heightened emotion, but these depend more on context and punctuation than grammatical components.)

Parts of Speech

General patterns offer overall structures for English sentences, while the broad grammatical units are formed of individual words and phrases. In English, we define different word types as parts of speech. Exactly how many we have depends on how people break them down. Here, we’ll look at nine, each of which is explained below. Either keep reading or click on the word types to go to the sections about their word order rules.

  • Nouns – naming words that define someone or something, e.g. car, woman, cat
  • Pronouns – words we use in place of nouns, e.g. he, she, it
  • Verbs – doing or being words, describing an action, state or experience e.g. run, talk, be
  • Adjectives – words that describe nouns or pronouns, e.g. cheerful, smelly, loud
  • Adverbs – words that describe verbs, adjectives, other adverbs, sentences themselves – anything other nouns and pronouns, basically, e.g. quickly, curiously, weirdly
  • Determiners – words that tell us about a noun’s quantity or if it’s specific, e.g. a, the, many
  • Prepositions – words that show noun or noun phrase positions and relationships, e.g. above, behind, in, on
  • Conjunctions – words that connect words, phrases or clauses e.g. and, but
  • Interjections – words that express a single emotion, e.g. Hey! Ah! Oof!

For more articles and exercises on all of these, be sure to also check out ELB’s archive covering parts of speech.

Noun Phrases, Determiners and Adjectives

Subjects and objects are likely to be nouns or noun phrases, describing things. So sentences usually to start with a noun phrase followed by a verb.

  • Nina ate.

However, a noun phrase may be formed of more than word.

We define nouns with determiners. These always come first in a noun phrase. They can be articles (a/an/the – telling us if the noun is specific or not), or can refer to quantities (e.g. some, much, many):

  • a dog (one of many)
  • the dog in the park
  • many dogs

After determiners, we use adjectives to add description to the noun:

  • The fluffy dog.

You can have multiple adjectives in a phrase, with orders of their own. You can check out my other article for a full analysis of adjective word order, considering type, material, size and other qualities – but a starting rule is that less definite adjectives go first – more specific qualities go last. Lead with things that are more opinion-based, finish with factual elements:

  • It is a beautiful wooden chair. (opinion before fact.)

We can also form compound nouns, where more than one noun is used, e.g. “cat food”, “exam paper”. The earlier nouns describe the final noun: “cat food” is a type of food, for cats; an “exam paper” is a specific paper. With compound nouns you have a core noun (the last noun), what the thing is, and any nouns before it describe what type. So – description first, the actual thing last.

Finally, noun phrases may also include conjunctions joining lists of adjectives or nouns. These usually come between the last two items in a list, either between two nouns or noun phrases, or between the last two adjectives in a list:

  • Julia and Lenny laughed all day.
  • a long, quick and dangerous snake

Pronouns

We use pronouns in the place of nouns or noun phrases. For the most part, these fit into sentences the same way as nouns, in subject or object positions, but don’t form phrases, as they replace a whole noun phrase – so don’t use describing words or determiners with pronouns.

Pronouns suggest we already know what is being discussed. Their positions are the same as nouns, except with phrasal verbs, where pronouns often have fixed positions, between a verb and a particle (see below).

Verbs

Verb phrases should directly follow the subject, so in terms of parts of speech a verb should follow a noun phrase, without connecting words.

As with nouns and noun phrases, multiple words may make up the verb component. Verb phrases depend on your tenses, which follow particular forms – e.g. simple, continuous, perfect and perfect continuous. The specifics of verb phrases are covered elsewhere, for example the full verb forms for the tenses are available in The English Tenses Practical Grammar Guide. But in terms of structure, with standard, declarative clauses the ordering of verb phrases should not change from their typical tense forms. Other parts of speech do not interrupt verb phrases, except for adverbs.

The times that verb phrases do change their structure are for Questions and Negatives.

With Yes/No Questions, the first verb of a verb phrase comes before the subject.

  • Neil is running. –> Is Neil running?

This requires an auxiliary verb – a verb that creates a grammatical function. Many tenses already have an auxiliary verb – to be in continuous tenses (“is running”), or to have in perfect tenses (have done). For these, to make a question we move that auxiliary in front of the subject. With the past and present simple tenses, for questions, we add do or did, and put that before the subject.

  • Neil ran. –> Did Neil run?

We can also have questions that use question words, asking for information (who, what, when, where, why, which, how), which can include noun phrases. For these, the question word and any noun phrases it includes comes before the verb.

  • Where did Neil Run?
  • At what time of day did Neil Run?

To form negative statements, we add not after the first verb, if there is already an auxiliary, or if there is not auxiliary we add do not or did not first.

  • Neil is running. –> Neil is not
  • Neil ran. Neil did not

The not stays behind the subject with negative questions, unless we use contractions, where not is combined with the verb and shares its position.

  • Is Neil not running?
  • Did Neil not run?
  • Didn’t Neil run?

Phrasal Verbs

Phrasal verbs are multi-word verbs, often with very specific meanings. They include at least a verb and a particle, which usually looks like a preposition but functions as part of the verb, e.g. “turn up“, “keep on“, “pass up“.

You can keep phrasal verb phrases all together, as with other verb phrases, but they are more flexible, as you can also move the particle after an object.

  • Turn up the radio. / Turn the radio up.

This doesn’t affect the meaning, and there’s no real right or wrong here – except with pronouns. When using pronouns, the particle mostly comes after the object:

  • Turn it up. NOT Turn up it.

For more on phrasal verbs, check out the ELB phrasal verbs master list.

Adverbs

Adverbs and adverbial phrases are really tricky in English word order because they can describe anything other than nouns. Their positions can be flexible and they appear in unexpected places. You might find them in the middle of verb phrases – or almost anywhere else in a sentence.

There are many different types of adverbs, with different purposes, which are usually broken down into degree, manner, frequency, place and time (and sometimes a few others). They may be single words or phrases. Adverbs and adverb phrases can be found either at the start of a clause, the end of a clause, or in a middle position, either directly before or after the word they modify.

  • Graciously, Claire accepted the award for best student. (beginning position)
  • Claire graciously accepted the award for best student. (middle position)
  • Claire accepted the award for best student graciously. (end position)

Not all adverbs can go in all positions. This depends on which type they are, or specific adverb rules. One general tip, however, is that time, as with the general sentence patterns, should usually come last in a clause, or at the very front if moved for emphasis.

With verb phrases, adverbs often either follow the whole phrase or come before or after the first verb in a phrase (there are regional variations here). 

For multiple adverbs, there can be a hierarchy in a similar way to adjectives, but you shouldn’t often use many adverbs together.

The largest section of the Word Order book discusses adverbs, with exercises.

Prepositions

Prepositions are words that, generally, demonstrate relationships between noun phrases (e.g. by, on, above). They mostly come before a noun phrase, hence the name pre-position, and tend to stick with the noun phrase they describe, so move with the phrase.

  • They found him [in the cupboard].
  • [In the cupboard,] they found him.

In standard sentence structure, prepositional phrases often follow verbs or other noun phrases, but they may also be used for defining information within a noun phrases itself:

  • [The dog in sunglasses] is drinking water.

Conjunctions

Conjunctions connect lists in noun phrases (see nouns) or connect clauses, meaning they are found between complete clauses. They can also come at the start of a sentence that begins with a subordinate clause, when clauses are rearranged (see below), but that’s beyond the standard word order we’re discussing here. There’s more information about this in the article on different sentence types.

As conjunctions connect clauses, they come outside our sentence and word type patterns – if we have two clauses following subject-verb-object, the conjunction comes between them:

Subject

Verb

Object

Conjunction

Subject

Verb

Object

He

washed

the car

while

she

ate

a pie.

Interjections

These are words used to show an emotion, usually something surprising or alarming, often as an interruption – so they can come anywhere! They don’t normally connect to other words, as they are either used to get attention or to cut off another thought.

  • Hey! Do you want to go swimming?
  • OH NO! I forgot my homework.

Clauses and Simple, Compound and Complex Sentences

While a phrase is any group of words that forms a single grammatical unit, a clause is when a group of words form a complete grammatical idea. This is possible when we follow the patterns at the start of this article, for example when we combine a subject and verb (or noun phrase and verb phrase).

A single clause can follow any of the patterns we’ve already discussed, using varieties of the word types covered; it can be as simple a two-word subject-verb combo, or it may include as many elements as you can think of:

  • Eric sat.
  • The boy spilt blue paint on Harriet in the classroom this morning.

As long as we have one main verb and one main subject, these are still single clauses. Complete with punctuation, such as a capital letter and full stop, and we have a complete sentence, a simple sentence. When we combine two or more clauses, we form compound or complex sentences, depending on the clauses relationships to each other. Each type is discussed below.

Simple Sentences

A sentence with one independent clause is what we call a simple sentence; it presents a single grammatically complete action, event or idea. But as we’ve seen, just because the sentence structure is called simple it does not mean the tenses, subjects or additional information are simple. It’s the presence of one main verb (or verb phrase) that keeps it simple.

Our additional information can include any number of objects, prepositional phrases and adverbials; and that subject and verb can be made up of long noun and verb phrases.

Compound Sentences

We use conjunctions to bring two or more clauses together to create a compound sentence. The clauses use the same basic order rules; just treat the conjunction as a new starting point. So after one block of subject-verb-object, we have a conjunction, then the next clause will use the same pattern, subject-verb-object.

  • [Gemma worked hard] and [Paul copied her].

See conjunctions for another example.

A series of independent clauses can be put together this way, following the expected patterns, joined by conjunctions.

Compound sentences use co-ordinating conjunctions, such as and, but, for, yet, so, nor, and or, and do not connect the clauses in a dependent way. That means each clause makes sense on its own – if we removed the conjunction and created separate sentences, the overall meaning would remain the same.

With more than two clauses, you do not have to include conjunctions between each one, e.g. in a sequence of events:

  • I walked into town, I visited the book shop and I bought a new textbook.

And when you have the same subject in multiple clauses, you don’t necessarily need to repeat it. This is worth noting, because you might see clauses with no immediate subject:

  • [I walked into town], [visited the book shop] and [bought a new textbook].

Here, with “visited the book shop” and “bought a new textbook” we understand that the same subject applies, “I”. Similarly, when verb tenses are repeated, using the same auxiliary verb, you don’t have to repeat the auxiliary for every clause.

What about ordering the clauses? Independent clauses in compound sentences are often ordered according to time, when showing a listed sequence of actions (as in the example above), or they may be ordered to show cause and effect. When the timing is not important and we’re not showing cause and effect, the clauses of compound sentences can be moved around the conjunction flexibly. (Note: any shared elements such as the subject or auxiliary stay at the front.)

  • Billy [owned a motorbike] and [liked to cook pasta].
  • Billy [liked to cook pasta] and [owned a motorbike].

Complex Sentences

As well as independent clauses, we can have dependent clauses, which do not make complete sense on their own, and should be connected to an independent clause. While independent clauses can be formed of two words, the subject and verb, dependent clauses have an extra word that makes them incomplete – either a subordinating conjunction (e.g. because, when, since, if, after and although), or a relative pronoun, (e.g. that, who and which). 

  • Jim slept.
  • While Jim slept,

Subordinating conjunctions and relative pronouns create, respectively, a subordinate clause or a relative clause, and both indicate the clause is dependent on more information to form a complete grammatical idea, to be provided by an independent clause:

  • While Jim slept, the clowns surrounded his house.

In terms of structure, the order of dependent clauses doesn’t change from the patterns discussed before – the word that comes at the front makes all the difference. We typically connect independent clauses and dependent clauses in a similar way to compound sentences, with one full clause following another, though we can reverse the order for emphasis, or to present a more logical order.

  • Although she liked the movie, she was frustrated by the journey home.

(Note: when a dependent clause is placed at the beginning of a sentence, we use a comma, instead of another conjunction, to connect it to the next clause.)

Relative clauses, those using relative pronouns (such as who, that or which), can also come in different positions, as they often add defining information to a noun or take the place of a noun phrase itself.

  • The woman who stole all the cheese was never seen again.
  • Whoever stole all the cheese is going to be caught one day.

In this example, the relative clause could be treated, in terms of position, in the same way as a noun phrase, taking the place of an object or the subject:

  • We will catch whoever stole the cheese.

For more information on this, check out the ELB guide to simple, compound and complex sentences.

That’s the end of my introduction to sentence structure and word order, but as noted throughout this article there are plenty more articles on this website for further information. And if you want a full discussion of these topics be sure to check out the bestselling guide, Word Order in English Sentences, available in eBook on this site and from all major retailers in paperback format.

Get the Complete Word Order Guide

This article is expanded upon in the bestselling grammar guide, Word Order in English Sentences, available in eBook and paperback.

If you found this useful, check out the complete book for more.

Which word order should I choose in noun phrases with a proper noun component and a common noun component?

  • the Elvis Presley singer v. the singer Elvis Presley

  • the Star Wars movie v. the movie Star Wars

  • the Thames River v. the River Thames

  • the Lisp programming language v. the programming language Lisp

  • the x variable v. the variable x

Answer

Incomplete answer:

  • You can’t say «the Elvis Presley singer» to mean «the singer named Elvis Presley».

  • For rivers, the word «River» tends to come last. E.g. in the United States the «Mississippi River» and «Missouri River» are pretty much never named with the reverse order. But it depends on the specific river; the Thames is one where «the River Thames» is common.

  • «the Lisp programming language» and «the programming language Lisp» mean the same thing, and are both pretty normal word orders.

  • «the variable x» seems like a more usual word order to me. «the x variable» would probably show up most often in contexts where it is used to mean «the variable on the x-axis».

I think that your question covers two distinct constructions:

  • the attributive construction. In this construction, a noun, «N-bar» or «nominal» (sorry, I don’t know a good, non-confusing term for this, but I wouldn’t call it a «noun phrase» because it cannot contain an article) is used to modify a following noun, «N-bar» or «nominal»; the combination acts as an «N-bar» or «nominal» and can be preceded by an article. The meaning of an «attributive» construction is vague: it tells you that the head noun is of a «type» that is somehow related to the attributive noun, but it doesn’t tell you the nature of the relationship. «Baby oil» is oil for using on babies, but «olive oil» is oil made from olives.

  • Apposition, a construction where two noun phrases that identify the same entity but in different ways are placed next to each other.

Attributives

«The Star Wars movie» is an attributive construction: it brackets as «the [[Star Wars] movie]», and means something like «the movie of a type related to Star Wars«. This doesn’t necessarily mean «the movie named Star Wars«: for example, during the time frame when the movie titled Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was playing in theaters, you might have heard someone say «I’m planning to go to see the Star Wars movie with my family tomorrow».

«The x variable» also seems to me to be most naturally interpreted as an attributive construction, bracketed as «the [[x] variable]»; this may explain the conjecture about its meaning that I mentioned above, where it would be expected to mean «the variable on the x-axis» = «the variable of a type related to x (= related to the x axis)».

I suppose that «the [[Lisp] programming language]» and «the [[Thames] River]» (or «river»?) are also attributive constructions, although I’m less sure about these.

Apposition

«The movie Star Wars» is not an attributive-noun construction and it is not bracketed as «[the [movie [Star Wars]]]». Rather, is an appositional construction, bracketed as «[the movie] [Star Wars]».

I think that «[the singer] [Elvis Presley]», «[the River] [Thames]», «[the programming language] [Lisp]» and «[the variable] [x]» are also appositional constructions.

The proper-noun component does not always come first in an appositional construction:

  • John the Baptist (the whole thing here functions as a larger proper noun)

  • Elvis Presley, the singer, …

  • Lisp, the programming language, …

There seem to be some restrictions: neither «Thames, the river» nor «x, the variable» sound acceptable to me, and «Star Wars, the movie» sounds awkward. When the non-proper-noun part is longer, it may sound more acceptable to put it second: «x, the variable that we will be examining next,» or «Star Wars, the movie that started a popular franchise» sound better. Likewise, something like «Elvis Presley, the famous singer, …» sounds more natural than just «Elvis Presley, the singer, …».

Attribution
Source : Link , Question Author : Maggyero , Answer Author : herisson

Incomplete answer:

  • You can’t say «the Elvis Presley singer» to mean «the singer named Elvis Presley».

  • For rivers, the word «River» tends to come last. E.g. in the United States the «Mississippi River» and «Missouri River» are pretty much never named with the reverse order. But it depends on the specific river; the Thames is one where «the River Thames» is common.

  • «the Lisp programming language» and «the programming language Lisp» mean the same thing, and are both pretty normal word orders.

  • «the variable x» seems like a more usual word order to me. «the x variable» would probably show up most often in contexts where it is used to mean «the variable on the x-axis».

I think that your question covers two distinct constructions:

  • the attributive construction. In this construction, a noun, «N-bar» or «nominal» (sorry, I don’t know a good, non-confusing term for this, but I wouldn’t call it a «noun phrase» because it cannot contain an article) is used to modify a following noun, «N-bar» or «nominal»; the combination acts as an «N-bar» or «nominal» and can be preceded by an article. The meaning of an «attributive» construction is vague: it tells you that the head noun is of a «type» that is somehow related to the attributive noun, but it doesn’t tell you the nature of the relationship. «Baby oil» is oil for using on babies, but «olive oil» is oil made from olives.

  • Apposition, a construction where two noun phrases that identify the same entity but in different ways are placed next to each other.

Attributives

«The Star Wars movie» is an attributive construction: it brackets as «the [[Star Wars] movie]», and means something like «the movie of a type related to Star Wars«. This doesn’t necessarily mean «the movie named Star Wars«: for example, during the time frame when the movie titled Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was playing in theaters, you might have heard someone say «I’m planning to go to see the Star Wars movie with my family tomorrow».

«The x variable» also seems to me to be most naturally interpreted as an attributive construction, bracketed as «the [[x] variable]»; this may explain the conjecture about its meaning that I mentioned above, where it would be expected to mean «the variable on the x-axis» = «the variable of a type related to x (= related to the x axis)».

I suppose that «the [[Lisp] programming language]» and «the [[Thames] River]» (or «river»?) are also attributive constructions, although I’m less sure about these.

Apposition

«The movie Star Wars» is not an attributive-noun construction and it is not bracketed as «[the [movie [Star Wars]]]». Rather, is an appositional construction, bracketed as «[the movie] [Star Wars]».

I think that «[the singer] [Elvis Presley]», «[the River] [Thames]», «[the programming language] [Lisp]» and «[the variable] [x]» are also appositional constructions.

The proper-noun component does not always come first in an appositional construction:

  • John the Baptist (the whole thing here functions as a larger proper noun)

  • Elvis Presley, the singer, …

  • Lisp, the programming language, …

There seem to be some restrictions: neither «Thames, the river» nor «x, the variable» sound acceptable to me, and «Star Wars, the movie» sounds awkward. When the non-proper-noun part is longer, it may sound more acceptable to put it second: «x, the variable that we will be examining next,» or «Star Wars, the movie that started a popular franchise» sound better. Likewise, something like «Elvis Presley, the famous singer, …» sounds more natural than just «Elvis Presley, the singer, …».

1. Defining the values

This map shows the order of adposition and noun phrase.  The two primary types of adpositions are prepositions and postpositions: prepositions precede the noun phrase they occur with, as in English and in the Boumaa Fijian (Austronesian) example in (1a), while postpositions follow the noun phrase they occur with, as in the Lezgian (Nakh-Daghestanian; Russia) example in (1b).

(1) 

a. 

Boumaa Fijian (Dixon 1988: 216) 

 

au 

na 

talai 

Elia 

’Orovou 

 

1sg

fut 

send 

Elia 

to 

’Orovou 

     

Prep 

NP 

 

‘I’ll send Elia to ’Orovou.’ 

b. 

Lezgian (Haspelmath 1993: 218) 

 

duxtur-r-in 

patariw 

fe-na 

 
 

doctor-pl-gen

to 

go-aor

 
 

NP 

Postp 

   
 

‘She went to doctors.’ 

A word is treated here as an adposition (preposition or postposition) if it combines with a noun phrase and indicates the grammatical or semantic relationship of that noun phrase to the verb in the clause. Some languages also employ adpositions to indicate a relationship of a noun phrase to a noun (especially in a genitive/possessive relationship); however, if the only candidates in a language for adpositions are in the genitive construction, they are not treated as adpositions here.

In some languages, some or all of the functions of adpositions are carried by case affixes on nouns, as in the example in (2) from Ngalakan (Gunwinyguan; Northern Territory, Australia).

(2) Ngalakan (Merlan 1983: 46) 

ŋañjuḷa-ŋini-ʔwala

ŋu-yerk-gaŋiñ 

eye-1sg.possfrom

1sg.3sg-come.out-caus.pst.punct

‘I removed it from my eye.’ 

Case affixes and adpositions can be referred to together as case markers. While some linguists occasionally apply the terms preposition  or postposition  to case affixes with meanings corresponding to prepositions in European languages, case affixes are not treated as adpositions on this map (see Map 51A on case affixes). On the other hand, many languages have case markers which are not separate words phonologically but whose position is still determined syntactically. The most common instances of this are case markers that are clitics which attach phonologically to the first or last word in the noun phrase, as illustrated by the postpositional clitic in (3) from Kunuz Nubian (Nilo-Saharan; Egypt).

(3) Kunuz Nubian (Abdel-Hafiz 1988: 283) 

[esey 

kursel]=lo

uski-takki-s-i 

[village 

old]=loc

born-pass-pst-1sg

‘I was born in an old village.’ 

Such clitic case markers, which attach to modifiers of the noun if they are at the beginning or end of the noun phrase, are treated here as instances of adpositions since they combine syntactically with noun phrases, even though they are not separate phonological words. A number of languages in which modifiers always precede the noun, and in which the case marker always occurs at the end of the noun phrase (and hence on the noun), are in principle ambiguous as to whether the case marker should be treated as a case suffix or a postpositional clitic; for the purposes of this map, I treat such case markers as case suffixes and not as postpositional clitics.

The map also shows a rare third type of adposition, what I will call inpositions, adpositions which occur or can occur inside the noun phrase they accompany. In Anindilyakwa (isolate; Northern Territory, Australia) the inpositions are second-position clitics within the noun phrase, attaching phonologically to the end of the first word in the noun phrase, as in (4), in which the inposition attaches to the word for ‘small’ in the noun phrase meaning ‘small stick’.

(4) Anindilyakwa (Groote Eylandt Linguistics-langwa 1993: 202) 

…narri-ng-akbilyang-uma 

[eyukwujiya=manja

eka] 

nc₁.pl-nc₂-stick.to.end-ta

[small=loc

stick] 

‘… they stuck them (the feathers) to a little stick.’ 

In Tümpisa Shoshone (Uto-Aztecan; California), the inpositions appear immediately after the noun and before any postnominal modifiers (if there are any), as in (5). 

(5) Tümpisa Shoshone (Dayley 1989b: 257) 

[ohipim 

ma 

natii’iwantü-nna] 

tiyaitaiha 

satü 

[cold.obj

from 

mean-obj]

died 

that 

‘He died from a mean cold.’ 

In (5), the inposition ma  ‘from’ appears between the head noun ohipim  ‘cold’ and its postnominal modifier natti’iwantünna  ‘mean’. Note that the inpositions in Tümpisa Shoshone govern the objective case on pronouns, nouns and their modifiers (though the case is often null, as in the noun ohipim  ‘cold’), as shown on the postnominal modifier in (5). This shows that despite appearing inside the noun phrase, the inposition still determines the case inflection of words in that noun phrase. Only eight languages are shown on the map as having inpositions as the dominant adposition type, seven of them in Australia.

Some languages have both prepositions and postpositions.  While there are some languages in which specific adpositions can be used either as prepositions or as postpositions, in most languages of mixed adposition type, some of the adpositions are always prepositions while others are always postpositions. In some languages with both prepositions and postpositions, one type is considered dominant if there are considerably more adpositions of one type than the other or if there is reason to believe that one type is considerably more common in usage (see “Determining Dominant Word Order”). In Koyra Chiini (Songhay; Mali), for example, there are more than twice as many postpositions as prepositions and the prepositions have more specialized meanings (like ‘without’), while some of the postpositions have fairly basic meanings, suggesting that postpositions are probably much more common in usage (Heath 1999b: 103, 108). If neither type can be considered dominant, then the language is shown on the map as more than one adposition type with none dominant, though this also includes rare instances of languages with both postpositions and inpositions, such as Hanis Coos (Oregon Coast family; Frachtenberg 1922b). For example, Koromfe (Gur, Niger-Congo; Burkina Faso and Mali) has only two prepositions and an unclear number of postpositions (but greater than two); however, one of the prepositions has very broad meaning and appears to occur with high frequency, so Koromfe is treated as a language lacking a dominant adposition type (Rennison 1997: 73, 77, 294).

The final type consists of languages which do not have adpositions, or at least appear not to. Some such languages only employ case affixes as case markers, as in Yidiny (Pama-Nyungan; Queensland, Australia; Dixon 1977a); others lack case markers altogether, as in Kutenai (isolate; western North America). This type is underrepresented on the map because grammars do not generally say if a language lacks adpositions and one can only infer the absence of adpositions from a thorough grammar. Some languages only have one minor adposition. For example, Wardaman (Yangmanic; Northern Territory, Australia) has only one postposition, meaning ‘like’, as in (6).

(6) Wardaman (Merlan 1994: 99) 

mernden 

marrajbi 

ya-wurr-yanggan 

white.abs

like 

3.subj-3nsg.obj-go.potential

‘They have to be like white people.’ 

The words analysed here as prepositions or postpositions are often referred to by authors of grammars by some other label. For example, what are treated here as clitic postpositions are often referred to as case suffixes  in descriptions of languages, and many grammars do not mention that the so-called case suffixes attach to modifiers of the noun rather than to the noun if the modifier is the last element in the noun phrase. Even among adpositions which are not clitics, the words that count here as adpositions are often referred to by some other term. In some grammars, for example, they are called relators  (e.g. Derbyshire 1985 in reference to postpositions in Hixkaryana). In many languages, the words treated here as adpositions share grammatical properties with nouns or verbs and are often for that reason referred to in grammars as nouns or verbs. These shared properties generally reflect the fact that it is common for nouns and verbs to grammaticalize as adpositions, while often still retaining grammatical properties reflecting their grammaticalization source. For example, in Jakaltek (Mayan; Guatemala), prepositions inflect for their object with the same set of pronominal prefixes that indicate possessors on nouns, and the structure of prepositional phrases is the same as that of noun phrases with possessors. Thus the construction in (7a) mirrors that in (7b).

(7) Jakaltek (Craig 1977: 110, 106) 

a. 

y-ul 

te’ 

n̈ah 

 

3-in 

the.clf

house 

 

‘in the house’ 

b. 

y-ixal 

naj 

pel 

 

3-wife 

clf 

Peter 

 

‘Peter’s wife’ 

Such situations can either be described by saying that prepositions share certain properties with nouns or by saying that prepositions are a subclass of nouns. It is assumed here that the difference between these two ways of describing the situation is terminological. In fact, while Craig (1977) refers to words like ul  ‘in’ in (7a) as prepositions, Day (1973: 82), in a different description of the same language, characterizes them as nouns. Thus, the fact that a set of words with adpositional meaning arguably constitute a subclass of some other class, such as nouns or verbs, is not considered here as a reason not to treat them as adpositions.

On the other hand, the fact that certain nouns (or verbs) in a language sometimes translate into prepositions in English is not sufficient for them to be treated here as adpositions. There must be some reason to believe that they have grammaticalized to some extent, that they are to some extent grammatically distinct from other nouns (or verbs). For example, in languages with serial verb constructions, the equivalent of an instrumental adposition is often expressed by a verb meaning ‘use’, as in the example in (8) from Mandarin.

(8) Mandarin (Li and Thompson 1981: 597) 

tāmen 

yòng 

shǒu 

chī-fan 

3pl

use 

hand 

eat-food 

‘They eat with their hands.’ 

But in the absence of evidence of grammaticalization, an example like that in (8) is not sufficient to conclude that the word yòng  ‘use’ functions as anything but a normal verb. Conversely, in Maybrat (West Papuan; Papua, Indonesia), there is a word ae  ‘at’ which is morphologically and syntactically a verb.  The example in (9a) illustrates it functioning as a main verb, while the example in (9b) illustrates it functioning prepositionally.

(9) Maybrat (Dol 1999: 87, 88) 

a. 

y-ae 

Sorong 

   
 

3sg.m-at

Sorong 

   
 

‘He is in Sorong.’ 

b. 

ait 

y-amo 

m-ae 

amah 

 

3sg.m

3sg.m-go

3sg.f-at

house 

 

‘He goes home.’ 

However, when ae  is used prepositionally, as in (9b), it always occurs with a third person singular feminine subject prefix regardless of the person, number, and gender of the subject, indicating that it is grammatically distinct from normal verbs. It thus counts as a preposition for the purposes of this map.

2. Geographical distribution

Because adposition type correlates strongly with the order of object and verb (see Chapter 95), the distribution of prepositions and postpositions on this map resembles the distribution of object and verb on Map 83A. Prepositions predominate in the following areas: (i) Europe, North Africa and the Middle East; (ii) central and southern Africa; (iii) a large area extending from Southeast Asia, through Indonesia, the Philippines and the Pacific; (iv) the Pacific Northwest in Canada and the United States; and (v) Mesoamerica. Postpositions predominate (i) in most of Asia, except in Southeast Asia; (ii) in New Guinea, except in the northwest; (iii) in North America, except in the two areas noted above; and (iv) in most of South America.  Postpositions are more common than prepositions in much of Australia, especially among Pama-Nyungan languages, but in the northern part of Northern Territory, both types occur with comparable frequency. In fact, for many Australian languages, especially Pama-Nyungan, there is no evidence of adpositions of any sort.  While prepositions predominate in Africa as a whole, there are still many languages with postpositions, including an area in West Africa and one to the northeast.  There is one area in Africa stretching from Sudan and Ethiopia southwest into the northeastern corner of the Democratic Republic of the Congo where the map is quite complex. Languages with no adpositions are most common in Australia and North America.

April 30 2016, 14:27

Category:

  • Путешествия
  • Cancel

Группа существительного

1.1
Группа существительного (noun phrase) представляет с собой

главную часть

(Head), в роли которой чаще всего выступает существительное, и элементы, которые показывают «определенность» предмета или лица о котором идет речь —

дитерминативы

(Determinatives) – эту роль обычно играют определители или притяжательный падеж существительного.  И кроме того в конструкцию часто входят

определения

(Modifiers), которые обычно с грамматической точки зрения необязательны.

I remember

Determin-
ative
Premodi-
fication
head postmodification
Complementation

Alice’s
that
all those
a
the
a

fine warm
better
best
good

him
Peter
wedding
girl
days
story
trip
trip

with the red hair
in the country last year

that I once had

than that
that I ever had

Под

комплементацией

(Complementation) понимается разновидность определения, стоящего после определяемого слова, наличие которого делает смысл завершенным – т.е. оно «более обязательно» (хотя в тех случаях, когда смысл ясен из контекста его также можно опускать), чем обычные определения.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
  • Word order modal verbs
  • Word order meaning examples
  • Word order meaning english
  • Word order is important for
  • Word order intermediate level