Word for war crimes

This article lists and summarizes the war crimes that have violated the laws and customs of war since the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

Since many war crimes are not prosecuted (due to lack of political will, lack of effective procedures, or other practical and political reasons),[1] historians and lawyers will frequently make a serious case in order to prove that war crimes occurred, even though the alleged perpetrators of these crimes were never formally prosecuted because investigations cleared them of all charges.

Under international law, war crimes were formally defined as crimes during international trials such as the Nuremberg Trials and the Tokyo Trials, in which Austrian, German and Japanese leaders were prosecuted for war crimes which were committed during World War II.

1899–1902 Second Boer WarEdit

The term «concentration camp» was used to describe camps operated by the British Empire in South Africa during the Second Boer War in the years 1900–1902. As Boer farms were destroyed by the British under their «scorched earth» policy, many tens of thousands of women and children were forcibly moved into the concentration camps. Over 26,000 Boer women and children were to perish in these concentration camps.[2]

Six officers from the Bushveldt Carbineers were court-martialed for massacring POWs and civilians. Lieutenants Harry Morant, Peter Handcock, and George Witton were each found guilty of murder and sentenced to death. Morant and Handcock were executed, while Witton was reprieved and served a short prison sentence. Two of the other defendants, Major Robert Lenehan and Lieutenant Henry Picton, were found guilty of lesser charges. They were dismissed from the military and deported from South Africa after being found guilty of neglecting one’s duty and manslaughter, respectively. The last defendant, Captain Alfred Taylor, was acquitted.

1899–1902 Philippine–American WarEdit

New York Journal cartoon of May 5, 1902 about General Jacob H. Smith’s infamous order «Kill Everyone Over Ten». The caption at the bottom reads: «Criminals Because They Were Born Ten Years Before We Took the Philippines».

Reported American war crimes and atrocities during the Philippine–American War included the summary execution of civilians and prisoners, burning of villages, rape, and torture. 298,000 Filipinos were also moved to concentration camps, where thousands died.[3][4][5][6][7]

In November 1901, the Manila correspondent of the Philadelphia Ledger wrote: «The present war is no bloodless, opera bouffe engagement; our men have been relentless, have killed to exterminate men, women, children, prisoners and captives, active insurgents and suspected people from lads of ten up, the idea prevailing that the Filipino as such was little better than a dog».[8]

In response to the Balangiga massacre, which wiped out a U.S. company garrisoning Samar town, U.S. Brigadier General Jacob H. Smith launched a retaliatory march across Samar with the instructions: «I want no prisoners. I wish you to kill and burn, the more you kill and burn the better it will please me. I want all persons killed who are capable of bearing arms in actual hostilities against the United States».[9][10]

1904–1908: Herero WarsEdit

In August, German General Lothar von Trotha defeated the Ovaherero in the Battle of Waterberg and drove them into the desert of Omaheke, where most of them died of dehydration. In October, the Nama people also rebelled against the Germans, only to suffer a similar fate. Between 24,000 and 100,000 Hereros, 10,000 Nama and an unknown number of San died in the parallel Herero and Namaqua genocide.[11][12][13][14][15] Once defeated, thousands of Hereros and Namas were also imprisoned in concentration camps, where the majority died of diseases, abuse, and exhaustion.[16][17] German soldiers also regularly engaged in gang rapes[18] before killing the women or leaving them in the desert to die; a number of Herero women were also forced into involuntary prostitution.[19][20]: 31 [21]

1912-1913: Balkan WarsEdit

The Balkan Wars were marked by ethnic cleansing with all parties being responsible for grave atrocities against civilians and helped inspire later atrocities including war crimes during the 1990s Yugoslav Wars.[22][23][24][25]

Massacres of Albanians in the Balkan Wars were perpetrated on several occasions by Serbian and Montenegrin armies and paramilitaries.[26][27][28] According to contemporary accounts, between 10,000 and 25,000 Albanians were killed or died because of hunger and cold during that period;[28][29][30] many of the victims were children, women and the elderly.[31] In addition to the massacres, some civilians had their tongues, lips, ears and noses severed.[32][33] Philip J. Cohen also cited Durham as saying that Serbian soldiers helped bury people alive in Kosovo.[34] American relief commissioner Willar Howard said in a 1914 Daily Mirror interview that General Carlos Popovitch would shout, «Don’t run away, we are brothers and friends. We don’t mean to do any harm.»[35] Peasants who trusted Popovitch were shot or burned to death, and elderly women unable to leave their homes were also burned. Yugoslavia from a Historical Perspective, a 2017 study published in Belgrade by the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, said that villages were burned to ashes and Albanian Muslims forced to flee when Serbo-Montenegrin forces invaded Kosovo in 1912. Some chronicles cited decapitation as well as mutilation.[36]

Serbian army also brutally suppressed the Tikveš uprising and terrorized the Bulgarian population in the rebelling regions. According to some sources 363 civilian Bulgarians were killed in Kavadarci, 230 — in Negotino and 40 — in Vatasha.[37]

1914–1918: World War IEdit

Austro-Hungarian troops executing captured Serbians, 1917. Serbia lost about 850,000 people during the war, a quarter of its pre-war population.[38]

World War I was the first major international conflict to take place following the codification of war crimes at the Hague Convention of 1907, including derived war crimes, such as the use of poisons as weapons, as well as crimes against humanity, and derivative crimes against humanity, such as torture, and genocide. Before, the Second Boer War took place after the Hague Convention of 1899. The Second Boer War (1899 until 1902) is known for the first concentration camps (1900 until 1902) for civilians in the 20th century.

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
World War I German Empire (Imperial Germany)
Rape of Belgium War crimes No prosecutions In defiance of the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare, the German occupiers engaged in mass atrocities against the civilian population of Belgium and looting and destruction of civilian property, in order to flush out the Belgian guerrilla fighters, or francs-tireurs, in the first two months of the war, after the German invasion of Belgium in August 1914.[39]

As Belgium was officially neutral after hostilities in Europe broke out and Germany invaded the country without explicit warning, this act was also in breach of the treaty of 1839 and the 1907 Hague Convention on Opening of Hostilities.[40]

World War I All major belligerents
Employment of poison gas Use of poisons as weapons No prosecutions Poison gas was introduced by Imperial Germany, and was subsequently used by all major belligerents in the war, in violation of the 1899 Hague Declaration Concerning Asphyxiating Gases and the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare.[41][42]
World War I Ottoman Empire
Armenian genocide[43][44][45][46][47][48] War crimes, crimes against humanity, crime of genocide (extermination of Armenians in Western Armenia) The Turkish Courts-Martial of 1919–20 as well as the incomplete Malta Tribunals were trials of some of the perpetrators.

Several key perpetrators of the genocide were assassinated by Armenian vigilantes as part of Operation Nemesis.

The Young Turk regime ordered the wholesale extermination of Armenians living within Western Armenia. This was carried out by certain elements of their military forces, who either massacred Armenians outright, or deported them to Syria and then massacred them. Over 1.5 million Armenians perished.[citation needed]

The Republic of Turkey, the successor state of the Ottoman Empire, does not accept the word genocide as an accurate description of the events surrounding this matter.[49]

Assyrian genocide War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, ethnic cleansing Several key perpetrators of the genocide were assassinated by Armenian vigilantes as part of Operation Nemesis Mass killing of Assyrian civilians by the Ottoman Empire’s forces resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands. Turkey does not call the event genocide.
Greek genocide War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, ethnic cleansing Turkish Courts-Martial of 1919–20Several key perpetrators of the genocide were assassinated by Armenian vigilantes as part of Operation Nemesis Violent ethnic cleansing campaign against Greeks in Anatolia resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands. Turkey does not call the event genocide.
World War I United Kingdom
Baralong Incidents War crimes (murder of shipwreck survivors) No prosecutions On 19 August 1915, a German submarine, U-27, while preparing to sink the British freighter Nicosian, which was loaded with war supplies, after the crew had boarded the lifeboats, was sunk by the British Q-ship HMS Baralong. Afterwards, Lieutenant Godfrey Herbert ordered his Baralong crew to kill the survivors of the German submarine while still at sea, including those who were summarily executed after boarding the Nicosian. The massacre was reported to a newspaper by American citizens who were also on board the Nicosian.[50] Another attack occurred on 24 September a month later when Baralong destroyed U-41, which was in the process of sinking the cargo ship Urbino. According to U41’s commander Karl Goetz, the British vessel was flying the American flag even after opening fire on the submarine, and the lifeboat carrying the German survivors was rammed and sunk by the British Q-ship.[51]
World War I Russian Empire
Urkun War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide No prosecutions

Urkun was not covered by Soviet textbooks, and monographs on the subject were removed from Soviet printing houses. As the Soviet Union was disintegrating in 1991, interest in Urkun grew. Some survivors have begun to label the events a «massacre» or «genocide».[52] In August 2016, a public commission in Kyrgyzstan concluded that the 1916 mass crackdown was labelled as «genocide».[53] Arnold Toynbee alleges 500,000 Central Asian Turks perished under the Russian Empire, though he admits this is speculative.[54] Rudolph Rummel citing Toynbee states 500,000 perished within the revolt.[55][unreliable source?] Kyrgyz sources put the death toll between 100,000 and 270,000. Russian sources put the figure at 3,000.[56] Kyrgyz historian Shayyrkul Batyrbaeva puts the death toll at 40,000, based on population tallies.[citation needed]

Deportation of Volhynia Germans War crimes, crimes against humanity Although Germans were permitted to return and attempt to reclaim their land, it is estimated that only one-half of their number did so. Many found their houses destroyed and their farms occupied by strangers.[57] Grand Duke Nicholas (who was still commander-in-chief of the Western forces), after suffering serious defeats at the hands of the German army, decided to implement the decrees for the German Russians living under his army’s control, principally in the Volhynia province. The lands were to be expropriated, and the owners deported to Siberia. The land was to be given to Russian war veterans once the war was over. In July 1915, without prior warning, 150,000 German settlers from Volhynia were arrested and shipped to internal exile in Siberia and Central Asia. (Some sources indicate that the number of deportees reached 200,000.) Ukrainian peasants took over their lands. The mortality rate from these deportations is estimated to have been 63,000 to 100,000, that is from 30% to 50%, but exact figures are impossible to determine.[citation needed]
World War I Kingdom of Bulgaria
Surdulica massacre Summary executions No prosecutions The Surdulica massacre was the mass murder of Serbian men by Bulgarian occupational authorities in the southern Serbian town of Surdulica in 1916 and early 1917, during World War I. Members of the Serbian intelligentsia in the region, mostly functionaries, teachers, priests and former soldiers, were detained by Bulgarian forces—ostensibly so that they could be deported to the Bulgarian capital, Sofia—before being taken into the forests around Surdulica and killed. An estimated 2,000–3,000 Serbian men were executed by the Bulgarians in the town and its surroundings. Witnesses to the massacre were interviewed by American writer William A. Drayton in December 1918 and January 1919.[58]
World War I
Štip massacre Summary executions No prosecutions The Štip massacre was the mass murder of Serbian soldiers by the IMRO paramilitaries in the village of Ljuboten, Štip on 15 October 1915, during World War I. Sick and wounded Serbian soldiers, recuperating at the Štip town hospital, were detained by Bulgarian IMRO militants before being taken into the vicinity of Ljuboten and killed. An estimated 118–120 Serbian soldiers were executed in the massacre.[59]

1915–1920: First and Second Caco WarEdit

  • During the First (1915) and Second (1918–1920) Caco Wars waged during the United States occupation of Haiti (1915–1934), human rights abuses were committed against the native Haitian population.[60][61][62] Overall, American troops and the Haitian gendarmerie killed several thousands of Haitian civilians during the rebellions between 1915 and 1920, though the exact death toll is unknown.[62]
  • Mass killings of civilians were allegedly committed by United States Marines and their subordinates in the Haitian gendarmerie.[62] According to Haitian historian Roger Gaillard, such killings involved rape, lynchings, summary executions, burning villages and deaths by burning. Internal documents of the United States Army justified the killing of women and children, describing them as «auxiliaries» of rebels. A private memorandum of the Secretary of the Navy criticized «indiscriminate killings against natives». American officers who were responsible for acts of violence were given Creole names such as «Linx» for Commandant Freeman Lang and «Ouiliyanm» for Lieutenant Lee Williams. According to American journalist H. J. Seligman, Marines would practice «bumping off Gooks», describing the shooting of civilians in a manner which was similar to killing for sport.[62]
  • During the Second Caco War of 1918–1919, many Caco prisoners were summarily executed by Marines and the gendarmerie on orders from their superiors.[62] On June 4, 1916, Marines executed caco General Mizrael Codio and ten others after they were captured in Fonds-Verrettes.[62] In Hinche in January 1919, Captain Ernest Lavoie of the gendarmerie, a former United States Marine, allegedly ordered the killing of nineteen caco rebels according to American officers, though no charges were ever filed against him due to the fact that no physical evidence of the killing was ever presented.[62]
  • The torture of Haitian rebels and the torture of Haitians who were suspected of rebelling against the United States was a common practice among the occupying Marines. Some of the methods of torture included the use of water cure, hanging prisoners by their genitals and ceps, which involved pushing both sides of the tibia with the butts of two guns.[62]

1921–1927: Rif WarEdit

  • During the Rif War, Spanish forces used chemical weapons against Berber rebels and civilians in Morocco. These attacks marked the first widespread employment of gas warfare in the post-WWI era.[63] The Spanish army indiscriminately used phosgene, diphosgene, chloropicrin and mustard gas against civilian populations, markets and rivers.[64][65] Spain signed the Geneva Protocol in 1925, that prohibited chemical and biological warfare, while simultaneously employing these weapons across the Mediterranean.[65]
  • According to Miguel Alonso, Alan Kramer and Javier Rodrigo in the book Fascist Warfare, 1922–1945: Aggression, Occupation, Annihilation: «Apart from deciding not to use chemical weapons, Franco’s campaign to ‘cleanse Spain’ resembled that in Morocco: intelligence-gathering through torture, summary executions, forced labour, rape, and the sadistic killing of military prisoners.»[66]
  • Spanish mutilations of captured Moroccans were reported, including castration and severing heads, noses and ears, which were collected by Spanish legionnaries as war trophies and worn as necklaces or spiked on bayonets.[67]
  • On August 9, 1921, the Massacre of Monte Arruit occurred, in which 2,000 soldiers of the Spanish Army were killed by Riffian forces after surrendering the Monte Arruit garrison near Al Aaroui following a 12-day siege.[68]

1923–1932: Pacification of LibyaEdit

  • The Pacification of Libya resulted in mass deaths of the indigenous people in Cyrenaica by Italy. 80,000 or over a quarter[69][70] of the indigenous people in Cyrenaica perished during the pacification.
  • 100,000 Bedouin citizens were ethnically cleansed by expulsion from their land.[71]
  • Specific war crimes alleged to have been committed by the Italian armed forces against civilians include deliberate bombing of civilians, killing unarmed children, women, and the elderly, rape and disembowelment of women, throwing prisoners out of aircraft to their death and running over others with tanks, regular daily executions of civilians in some areas, and bombing tribal villages with mustard gas bombs beginning in 1930.[72]

1927-1949: Chinese Civil WarEdit

  • During the Chinese Civil War both the Nationalists and Communists carried out mass atrocities, with millions of non-combatants deliberately killed by both sides.[73] Benjamin Valentino has estimated atrocities in the Chinese Civil War resulted in the death of between 1.8 million and 3.5 million people between 1927 and 1949.[74]
  • Over several years after the 1927 Shanghai massacre, the Kuomintang killed between 300,000 and one million people, primarily peasants, in anti-communist campaigns as part of the White Terror.[75][76] During the White Terror, the Nationalists specifically targeted women with short hair who had not been subjected to foot binding, on the presumption that such «non-traditional» women were radicals.[76] Nationalist forces cut off their breasts, shaved their heads, and displayed their mutilated bodies to intimidate the populace.[76] From 1946 to 1949, the Nationalists arrested, tortured, and killed political dissidents via the Sino-American Cooperative Organization.[77]
  • During the December 1930 Futian incident, the communists executed 2,000 to 3,000 members of the Futian battalion after its leaders had mutinied against Mao Zedong.[78] Between 1931 and 1934 in the Jiangxi–Fujian Soviet, the communist authorities engaged in a widespread campaign of violence against civilians to ensure compliance with its policies and to stop defection to the advancing KMT, including mass executions, land confiscation and forced labor.[79] According to Li Weihan, a high-ranking communist in Jiangxi at the time, in response to mass flight of civilians to KMT held areas, the local authorities authorities would «usually to send armed squads after those attempting to flee and kill them on the spot, producing numerous mass graves throughout the CSR [Chinese Soviet Republic in Jiangxi] that would later be uncovered by the KMT and its allies.» Zhang Wentian, another high-ranking communist, reported that «the policy of annihilating landlords as an exploiting class had degenerated into a massacre»[80] The population of the communist controlled area fell by 700,000 from 1931 and 1935, of which a large proportion were murdered as “class enemies,” worked to death, committed suicide, or died in other circumstances attributable to the communists.[81]
  • During the Siege of Changchun the People’s Liberation Army implemented a military blockade on the KMT-held city of Changchun and prevented civilians from leaving the city during the blockade;[82] this blockade caused the starvation of tens[82] to 150[83] thousand civilians. The PLA continued to use siege tactics throughout Northeast China.[84]
  • At the outbreak of the Chinese Civil War in 1946, Mao Zedong began to push for a return to radical policies to mobilize China against the landlord class, but protected the rights of middle peasants and specified that rich peasants were not landlords.[85] The 7 July Directive of 1946 set off eighteen months of fierce conflict in which all rich peasant and landlord property of all types was to be confiscated and redistributed to poor peasants. Party work teams went quickly from village to village and divided the population into landlords, rich, middle, poor, and landless peasants. Because the work teams did not involve villagers in the process, however, rich and middle peasants quickly returned to power. [86] The Outline Land Law of October 1947 increased the pressure.[87] Those condemned as landlords were buried alive, dismembered, strangled and shot.[88]
  • In response to the aforementioned land reform campaign; the Kuomintang helped establish the «Huanxiang Tuan» (還鄉團), or Homecoming Legion, which was composed of landlords who sought the return of their redistributed land and property from peasants and CCP guerrillas, as well as forcibly conscripted peasants and communist POWs.[89] The Homecoming legion conducted its guerrilla warfare campaign against CCP forces and purported collaborators up until the end of the civil war in 1949.[89]

1935–1937: Second Italo-Abyssinian WarEdit

  • Italian use of mustard gas against Ethiopian soldiers in 1936 violated the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which bans the use of chemical weapons in warfare.
  • Crimes by Ethiopian troops included the use of dum-dum bullets (in violation of the Hague Conventions), the killing of civilian workmen (including during the Gondrand massacre), and the mutilation of captured Eritrean Ascari and Italians (often with castration), beginning in the first weeks of war.[90][91]
  • Yekatit 12—In response to the unsuccessful assassination of Rodolfo Graziani on 19 February 1937, thousands of Ethiopians were killed, including all of the monks residing at Debre Libanos, and over a thousand more detained at Danan who were then exiled either to the Dahlak Islands or Italy.[92]
  • The Ethiopians recorded 275,000 combatants killed in action, 78,500 patriots (guerrilla fighters) killed during the occupation, 17,800 civilians killed by aerial bombardment and 30,000 in the February 1937 massacre, 35,000 people died in concentration camps, 24,000 patriots executed by Summary Courts, 300,000 people died of privation due to the destruction of their villages, amounting to 760,300 deaths.[93]

1936–1939: Spanish Civil WarEdit

Republicans executed by Francoists at the beginning of the Spanish Civil War

At least 50,000 people were executed during the Spanish Civil War.[94][95] In his updated history of the Spanish Civil War, Antony Beevor writes, «Franco’s ensuing ‘white terror’ claimed 200,000 lives. The ‘red terror’ had already killed 38,000.»[96] Julius Ruiz[who?]concludes that «although the figures remain disputed, a minimum of 37,843 executions were carried out in the Republican zone with a maximum of 150,000 executions (including 50,000 after the war) in Nationalist Spain.»[97]

César Vidal puts the number of Republican victims at 110,965.[98] In 2008 a Spanish judge, Socialist Baltasar Garzón, opened an investigation into the executions and disappearances of 114,266 people between 17 July 1936 and December 1951. Among the murders and executions investigated was that of poet and dramatist Federico García Lorca.[99][100]

1939–1945: World War IIEdit

1946–1954: Indochina WarEdit

The French Union’s struggle against the independence movement backed by the Soviet Union and China claimed 400,000 to 1.5 million Vietnamese lives from 1945 to 1954.[101][102] In the Haiphong massacre of November 1946, about 6,000 Vietnamese were killed by French naval artillery.[101] The French employed electric shock treatment during interrogations of the Vietnamese, and nearly 10,000 Vietnamese perished in French concentration camps.[101]

According to Arthur J. Dommen, the Viet Minh assassinated 100,000–150,000 civilians during the war,[102] while Benjamin Valentino estimates that the French were responsible for 60,000 to 250,000 civilian deaths.[103]

About French massacres and war crimes during the conflict, Christopher Goscha wrote on The Penguin History of Modern Vietnam: «Rape became a disturbing weapon used by the Expeditionary Corps, as did summary executions. Young Vietnamese women who could not escape approaching enemy patrols smeared themselves with any stinking thing they could find, including human excrement. Decapitated heads were raised on sticks, bodies were gruesomely disemboweled, and body parts were taken as ‘souvenirs’; Vietnamese soldiers of all political colors also committed such acts. The non-communist nationalist singer, Phạm Duy, wrote a bone-chilling ballad about the mothers of Gio Linh village in central Vietnam, each of whom had lost a son to a French Army massacre in 1948. Troops decapitated their bodies and displayed their heads along a public road to strike fear into those tempted to accept the Democratic Republic of Vietnam’s sovereignty. Massacres did not start with the Americans in My Lai, or the Vietnamese communists in Hue in 1968. And yet, the French Union’s massacre of over two hundred Vietnamese women and children in My Tratch in 1948 remains virtually unknown in France to this day.»[104]

1947–1948: Malagasy UprisingEdit

During the French suppression of the pro-independence Malagasy Uprising, numerous atrocities were carried out such as mass killings, village burnings, torture, war rape, collective punishment, and throwing live prisoners out of airplanes (death flights).[105] Between 11,000 and 90,000 Malagasy died in the fighting, along with about 800 French soldiers and other Europeans.[106][101]

1948 Arab–Israeli WarEdit

Several massacres were committed during this war which could be described as war crimes.[citation needed] Nearly 15,000 people, mostly combatants and militants, were killed during the war, including 6,000 Jews and about 8,000 Arabs.

1945–1949: Indonesian War of IndependenceEdit

  • South Sulawesi Campaign, about 4,500 civilians killed by Pro-Indonesian and Indonesian forces and pro-Dutch and Dutch colonial forces (KNIL).
  • Rawagede massacre: about 431 civilians killed by Dutch forces
  • Bersiap massacre: about 25,000 Indo-European civilians, Dutch, and loyalists killed by Indonesian nationalist forces.
  • Indonesian National Revolution: About 100–150,000 Chinese, Communists, Europeans (French, German, British), pro-Dutch etc. were killed by Indonesian nationalist forces and Indonesian youth.

1948–1960: Malayan EmergencyEdit

  • War crimes: In the Batang Kali massacre, about 24 unarmed villagers were killed by British troops. The British government claimed that these villagers were insurgents attempting to escape but this was later known to be entirely false as they were unarmed, nor actually supporting the insurgents nor attempting to escape after being detained by British troops. No British soldier was prosecuted for the murder at Batang Kali.[107][108][109][110][111][112]
  • War crimes: includes beating, torturing, and killing by British troops and communist insurgents of non-combatants.[113]
  • War crimes: As part of the Briggs Plan devised by British General Sir Harold Briggs, 500,000 people (roughly ten percent of Malaya’s population) were eventually removed from the land and interned in guarded camps called «New Villages». The intent of this measure was to isolate villagers from contact with insurgents. While considered necessary, some of the cases involving the widespread destruction went beyond justification of military necessity. This practice was prohibited by the Geneva Conventions and customary international law which stated that the destruction of property must not happen unless rendered absolutely necessary by military operations.[113][114][115]

1950–1953: Korean WarEdit

United States perpetrated crimesEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Korean War United States
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
No Gun Ri massacre War crimes (murder of civilians) United States In July 1950, during the early weeks of the Korean War, an undetermined number of South Korean refugees were killed by the 2nd Battalion, 7th U.S. Cavalry Regiment, and a U.S. air attack at a railroad bridge near the village of No Gun Ri, 100 miles (160 km) southeast of Seoul, South Korea. Commanders feared enemy infiltrators among such refugee columns. Estimates of the dead have ranged from dozens to 500. In 2005, a South Korean government committee certified the names of 163 dead or missing and 55 wounded and added that many other victims’ names were not reported.[116] The South Korean government-funded No Gun Ri Peace Foundation estimated in 2011 that 250–300 were killed, mostly women and children.[117]

North Korean perpetrated crimesEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Korean War North Korea and China
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Seoul National University Hospital Massacre Crimes against humanity (Mass murder of civilians) North Korea The Seoul National University Hospital Massacre (Korean: 서울대학교 부속병원 학살 사건 Hanja: 서울國立大學校附属病院虐殺事件) was a massacre committed by the North Korean Army on June 18, 1950, of 700 to 900 doctors, nurses, inpatient civilians and wounded soldiers at the Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul district of South Korea.[118][119][120] During the First Battle of Seoul, the North Korean Army wiped out one platoon which guarded Seoul National University Hospital on June 28, 1950.[118][119] They massacred medical personnel, inpatients and wounded soldiers.[118][119] The North Korean Army shot or buried people alive.[118][119] The victims amounted to 900.[118][119] According to the South Korean Ministry of National Defense, the victims included 100 South Korean wounded soldiers.[119]
Chaplain–Medic massacre War crimes (murder of wounded military personnel and a chaplain) North Korea On July 16, 1950, 30 unarmed, critically wounded U.S. Army soldiers and an unarmed chaplain were killed by members of the North Korean People’s Army during the Battle of Taejon.
Bloody Gulch massacre War crimes (murder of prisoners of war) North Korea On August 12, 1950, 75 captured U.S. Army prisoners of war were executed by members of the North Korean People’s Army on a mountain above the village of Tunam, South Korea, during one of the smaller engagements of the Battle of Pusan Perimeter.
Hill 303 massacre War crimes (murder of prisoners of war) North Korea On August 17, 1950, following a UN airstrike on Hill 131 which was already occupied by the North Korean Army from the Americans, a North Korean officer said that the American soldiers were closing in on them and they could not continue to hold the captured American prisoners. The officer ordered the men shot, and the North Koreans then fired into the kneeling Americans as they rested in the gully, killing 41.
Sunchon Tunnel Massacre War crimes (murder of prisoners of war) North Korea 180 American prisoners of war, survivors of the Seoul-Pyongyang death march, were loaded onto a railroad car and brought to the Sunchon tunnel on October 30, 1950. Prisoners, who were already suffering from lack of food, water, and medical supplies were brought in groups of approximately 40 ostensibly to receive food and were shot by North Korean soldiers. 138 Americans in total died; 68 were murdered, 7 died of malnutrition, and the remainder died in the tunnel of pneumonia, dysentery, and malnutrition on the trip from Pyongyang.[121]
  • Rudolph Rummel estimated that the North Korean Army executed at least 500,000 civilians during the Korean War with many dying in North Korea’s drive to conscript South Koreans to their war effort. Throughout the conflict, North Korean and Chinese forces routinely mistreated U.S. and UN prisoners of war. Mass starvation and diseases swept through the Chinese-run POW camps during the winter of 1950–51. About 43 percent of all U.S. POWs died during this period. In violation of the Geneva Conventions which explicitly stated that captor states must repatriate prisoners of war to their homeland as quickly as possible, North Korea detained South Korean POWs for decades after the ceasefire. Over 88,000 South Korean soldiers were missing and the Communists’ themselves had claimed they had captured 70,000 South Koreans.[122][123]: 141 

South Korean perpetrated crimesEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Korean War South Korea
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Jeju uprising War crimes, Crimes against humanity (mass murder of civilians) South Korea The island of Jeju was considered a stronghold of the Korean independence movement and the South Korean Labor Party.[124]: 166–167 [125] Syngman Rhee had proclaimed martial law to quell an insurgency.[126]

Up to 10% of the island’s population died (14,000 to 30,000) as a result of the conflict,[124]: 195 [127]: 13  and another 40,000 fled to Japan.[125]

Bodo League massacre War crimes, Crimes against humanity (mass murder of civilians) South Korea The Bodo League massacre (Korean: 보도연맹 사건; Hanja: 保導聯盟事件) was a massacre and war crime against communists and suspected sympathisers that occurred in the summer of 1950 during the Korean War. Estimates of the death toll vary. According to Prof. Kim Dong-Choon, Commissioner of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, at least 100,000 people were executed on suspicion of supporting communism;[128] others estimate 200,000 deaths.[129] The massacre was wrongly blamed on the communists for decades.[130]
Goyang Geumjeong Cave Massacre War crimes (Mass murder of civilians) South Korea The Goyang Geumjeong Cave Massacre (Korean: 고양 금정굴 민간인 학살[131][132] Hanja: 高陽衿井窟民間人虐殺[131][132] Goyang Geunjeong Cave civilian massacre[131][132]) was a massacre conducted by the police officers of Goyang Police Station of the South Korean Police under the commanding of head of Goyang police station between 9 October 1950 and 31 October 1950 of 150 or over 153 unarmed citizens in Goyang, Gyeonggi-do district of South Korea.[131][132][133] After the victory of the Second Battle of Seoul, South Korean police arrested and killed people and their families who they suspected had been sympathisers during North Korean rule.[132] During the massacre, South Korean Police conducted Namyangju Massacre in Namyangju near Goyang.[134]
Sancheong-Hamyang massacre War Crimes (Mass murder of civilians) South Korea The Sancheong-Hamyang massacre (Korean: 산청・함양 양민 학살 사건; Hanja: 山清・咸陽良民虐殺事件) was a massacre conducted by a unit of the South Korean Army 11th Division during the Korean War. On February 7, 1951, 705 unarmed citizens in Sancheong and Hamyang, South Gyeongsang district of South Korea were killed. The victims were civilians and 85% of them were women, children, and elderly people.
Ganghwa massacre War crimes (Mass murder of civilians) South Korea The Ganghwa (Geochang) massacre (Korean: 거창 양민 학살 사건; Hanja: 居昌良民虐殺事件) was a massacre conducted by the third battalion of the 9th regiment of the 11th Division of the South Korean Army between February 9, 1951, and February 11, 1951, on 719 unarmed citizens in Geochang, South Gyeongsang district of South Korea. The victims included 385 children.

1952–1960: Mau Mau uprisingEdit

  • In attempt to suppress the insurgency in Kenya, British colonial authorities suspended civil liberties within the country. In response to the rebellion, many Kikuyu were relocated. According to British authorities 80,000 were interned. Caroline Elkins estimated that between 160,000 and 320,000 were moved into concentration camps. Other estimates are as high as 450,000 interned. Most of the remainder – more than a million – were held in «enclosed villages». Although some were Mau Mau guerillas, many were victims of collective punishment that colonial authorities imposed on large areas of the country. Thousands suffered beatings and sexual assaults during «screenings» intended to extract information about the Mau Mau threat. Later, prisoners suffered even worse mistreatment in an attempt to force them to renounce their allegiance to the insurgency and to obey commands. Significant numbers were murdered; official accounts describe some prisoners being roasted alive. Prisoners were questioned with the help of «slicing off ears, boring holes in eardrums, flogging until death, pouring paraffin over suspects who were then set alight, and burning eardrums with lit cigarettes». The British colonial police used a «metal castrating instrument» to cut off testicles and fingers. «By the time I cut his balls off», one settler boasted, «he had no ears, and his eyeball, the right one, I think, was hanging out of its socket. Too bad, he died before we got much out of him.» According to David Anderson, the British hanged over 1,090 suspected rebels: far more than the French had executed in Algeria during the Algerian War.[135] Another 400 were sentenced to death but reprieved because they were under 18 or women. The British declared some areas prohibited zones where anyone could be shot. It was common for Kikuyu to be shot because they «failed to halt when challenged.»[136][137][135]
  • The Chuka Massacre, which happened in Chuka, Kenya, was perpetrated by members of the King’s African Rifles B Company in June 1953 with 20 unarmed people killed during the Mau Mau uprising. Members of the 5th KAR B Company entered the Chuka area on June 13, 1953, to flush out rebels suspected of hiding in the nearby forests. Over the next few days, the regiment had captured and executed 20 people suspected of being Mau Mau fighters for unknown reasons. It is found out that most of the people executed were actually belonged to the Kikuyu Home Guard – a loyalist militia recruited by the British to fight an increasingly powerful and audacious guerrilla enemy. The commanding officer of the soldiers responsible, Major Gerald Griffiths, was court-martialed for murder. He was found guilty and sentenced to 7 years in prison. In an atmosphere of atrocity and reprisal, the matter was swept under the carpet and nobody else ever stood trial for the massacre.[138]
  • The Hola massacre was an incident during the conflict in Kenya against British colonial rule at a colonial detention camp in Hola, Kenya. By January 1959 the camp had a population of 506 detainees of whom 127 were held in a secluded «closed camp». This more remote camp near Garissa, eastern Kenya, was reserved for the most uncooperative of the detainees. They often refused, even when threats of force were made, to join in the colonial «rehabilitation process» or perform manual labour or obey colonial orders. The camp commandant outlined a plan that would force 88 of the detainees to bend to work. On 3 March 1959, the camp commandant put this plan into action – as a result, 11 detainees were clubbed to death by guards.[139] 77 surviving detainees sustained serious permanent injuries.[citation needed] The British government accepts that the colonial administration tortured detainees, but denies liability.[140]
  • The Lari massacre in the settlement of Lari occurred on the night of 25–26 March 1953, in which Mau Mau militants herded Kikuyu men, women and children into huts and set fire to them, killing anyone who attempted to escape. Official estimates place the death toll from the Lari massacre at 74 dead.[141]
  • Mau Mau militants also tortured, mutilated and murdered Kikuyu on many occasions.[142] Mau Mau racked up 1,819 murders of their fellow Africans, though again this number excludes the many additional hundreds who ‘disappeared’, whose bodies were never found.[143]

1954–1962: Algerian WarEdit

The insurgency began in 1945 and was revived in 1954, winning independence in the early 1960s. The French army killed thousands of Algerians in the first round of fighting in 1945.[101] After the Algerian independence movement formed a National Liberation Front (FLN) in 1954, the French Minister of the Interior joined the Minister of National Defense in 1955 in ordering that every rebel carrying a weapon, suspected of doing so, or suspected of fleeing, must be shot.[101] French troops executed civilians from nearby villages when rebel attacks occurred, tortured both rebels and civilians, and interned Arabs in camps, where forced labor was required of some of them.[101] 2,000,000 Algerians were displaced or forcibly resettled during the war,[144] and over 800 villages were destroyed from 1957 to 1960.[145]

Other French crimes included deliberate bombing, torture and mutilation of civilians, rape and sexual assaults, disembowelment of pregnant women, imprisonment without food in small cells, throwing detainees from helicopters and into the sea with concrete on their feet, and burying people alive.[146][147][148][149][150][151]

The FLN also indulged in a large amount of atrocities, both against French pieds-noirs and against fellow Algerians whom they deemed as supporting the French or simply as refusing to support the Liberation effort.[152] These crimes included killing unarmed children, women and the elderly, rape and disembowelment or decapitation of women and murdering children by slitting their throats or banging their heads against walls.[153] French sources estimated that 70,000 Muslim civilians were killed, or abducted and presumed killed, by the FLN during the war. The FLN also killed 30,000 to 150,000 in people in post-war reprisals.[154]

1955–1975: Vietnam WarEdit

United States perpetrated crimesEdit

During the war 95 U.S. Army personnel and 27 U.S. Marine Corps personnel were convicted by court-martial of the murder or manslaughter of Vietnamese.[155]: 33 

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Vietnam War United States
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Marion McGhee, Chu Lai Murder Lance Corporal Marion McGhee On 12 August 1965 Lcpl McGhee of Company M, 3rd Battalion, 3rd Marines, walked through Marine lines at Chu Lai Base Area toward a nearby village. In answer to a Marine sentry’s shouted question, he responded that he was going after a VC. Two Marines were dispatched to retrieve McGhee and as they approached the village they heard a shot and a woman’s scream and then saw McGhee walking toward them from the village. McGhee said he had just killed a VC and other VC were following him. At trial Vietnamese prosecution witnesses testified that McGhee had kicked through the wall of the hut where their family slept. He seized a 14-year-old girl and pulled her toward the door. When her father interceded, McGhee shot and killed him. Once outside the house the girl escaped McGhee with the help of her grandmother. McGhee was found guilty of unpremeditated murder and sentenced him to confinement at hard labor for ten years. On appeal this was reduced to 7 years and he actually served 6 years and 1 month.[155]: 33–4 
Xuan Ngoc (2) Murder and rape PFC John D. Potter, Jr.
Hospitalman John R. Bretag
PFC James H. Boyd, Jr.
Sergeant Ronald L. Vogel
On 23 September 1966, a nine-man ambush patrol from the 1st Battalion, 5th Marines, left Hill 22, northwest of Chu Lai. Private First Class John D. Potter, Jr. took effective command of the patrol. They entered the hamlet of Xuan Ngoc (2) and seized Dao Quang Thinh, whom they accused of being a Viet Cong, and dragged him from his hut. While they beat him, other patrol members forced his wife, Bui Thi Huong, from their hut and four of them raped her. A few minutes later three other patrol members shot Dao Quang Thinh, Bui, their child, Bui’s sister-in-law, and her sister in- law’s child. Bui Thi Huong survived to testify at the courts-martial. The company commander suspicious of the reported «enemy contact» sent Second Lieutenant Stephen J. Talty, to return to the scene with the patrol. Once there, Talty realized what had happened and attempted to cover up the incident. A wounded child was discovered alive and Potter bludgeoned it to death with his rifle. Potter was convicted of premeditated murder and rape, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for life, but was released in February 1978, having served 12 years and 1 month. Hospitalman John R. Bretag testified against Potter and was sentenced to 6 month’s confinement for rape. PFC James H. Boyd, Jr., pleaded guilty to murder and was sentenced to 4 years confinement at hard labor. Sergeant Ronald L. Vogel was convicted for murder of one of the children and rape and was sentenced to 50 years confinement at hard labor, which was reduced on appeal to 10 years, of which he served 9 years. Two patrol members were acquitted of major charges, but were convicted of assault with intent to commit rape and sentenced to 6 months’ confinement. Lt Talty was found guilty of making a false report and dismissed from the Marine Corps, but this was overturned on appeal.[155]: 53–4 [156]
Charles W. Keenan and Stanley J. Luczko Murder PFC Charles W. Keenan
CPL Stanley J. Luczko
PFC Charles W. Keenan was convicted of murder by firing at point-blank range into an unarmed, elderly Vietnamese woman, and an unarmed Vietnamese man. His life sentence was reduced to 25 years confinement. Upon appeal, the conviction for the woman’s murder was dismissed and confinement was reduced to five years. Later clemency action further reduced his confinement to 2 years and 9 months. Corporal Stanley J. Luczko, was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter and sentenced to confinement for three years[155]: 79–81 
Thuy Bo incident Murder (disputed) Company H, 2nd Battalion, 1st Marines From 31 January to 1 February 1967 145 civilians were purported to have been killed by Company H, 2nd Battalion, 1st Marines. Marine accounts record 101 Viet Cong and 22 civilians killed during a 2-day battle. Marines casualties were 5 dead and 26 wounded.
My Lai Massacre War crimes (Various crimes) Lt. William Calley convicted in 1971 of premeditated murder of 22 civilians for his role in the massacre and sentenced to life in prison. He served 3½ years under house arrest. Others were indicted but not convicted. On March 16, 1968, a US army platoon led by Lt. William Calley killed (and in some cases beat, raped, tortured, or maimed) 347 to 504 unarmed civilians – primarily women, children, and old men – in the hamlets of My Lai and My Khe of Sơn Mỹ. The My Lai Massacre was allegedly an operation of the Phoenix Program. 26 US soldiers, including 14 officers, were charged with crimes related to the My Lai massacre and its coverup. Most of the charges were eventually dropped, and only Lt. Calley was convicted.
Huế Murder Lcpl Denzil R. Allen
Pvt Martin R. Alvarez
Lcpl John D. Belknap
Lcpl James A. Maushart
PFC Robert J. Vickers
On 5 May 1968, Lcpl Denzil R. Allen led a six-man ambush patrol from the 1st Battalion, 27th Marines near Huế. They stopped and interrogated two unarmed Vietnamese men who Allen and Private Martin R. Alvarez then executed. After an attack on their base that night the unit sent out a patrol who brought back three Vietnamese men. Allen, Alvarez, Lance Corporals John D. Belknap, James A. Maushart, PFC Robert J. Vickers, and two others then formed a firing squad and executed two of the Vietnamese. The third captive was taken into a building where Allen, Belknap, and Anthony Licciardo, Jr., hanged him, when the rope broke Allen cut the man’s throat, killing him. Allen pleaded guilty to five counts of unpremeditated murder and was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for life reduced to 20 years in exchange for the guilty plea. Allen’s confinement was reduced to 7 years and he was paroled after having served only 2 years and 11 months confinement. Maushart pleaded guilty to one count of unpremeditated murder and was sentenced to 2 years confinement of which he served 1 year and 8 months. Belknap and Licciardo each pleaded guilty to single murders and were sentenced to 2 years confinement. Belknap served 15 months while Licciardo served his full sentence. Alvarez was found to lack mental responsibility and found not guilty. Vickers was found guilty of two counts of unpremeditated murder, but his convictions were overturned on review

[155]: 111–4 

Ronald J. Reese and Stephen D. Crider Murder Cpl Ronald J. Reese
Lcpl Stephen D. Crider
On the morning of 1 March 1969 an eight-man Marine ambush was discovered by three Vietnamese girls, aged about 13, 17, and 19, and a Vietnamese boy, about 11. The four shouted their discovery to those being observed by the ambush. Seized by the Marines, the four were bound, gagged, and led away by Corporal Ronald J. Reese and Lance Corporal Stephen D. Crider. Minutes later, the 4 children were seen, apparently dead, in a small bunker. The Marines tossed a fragmentation grenade into the bunker, which then collapsed the damaged structure atop the bodies. Reese and Crider were each convicted of four counts of murder and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for life. On appeal both sentences were reduced to 3 years confinement.[155]: 140 
Son Thang massacre Murder Company B, 1st Battalion, 7th Marines. One person was sentenced to life in prison, another sentenced to 5 years, but both sentences were reduced to less than a year.[157] 16 unarmed women and children were killed in the Son Thang Hamlet, on February 19, 1970, with those killed reported as enemy combatant.[157]
Tiger Force War crimes; crime of torture and murder Tiger Force LRRP Tiger Force was the name of a long-range reconnaissance patrol unit[158] of the 1st Battalion (Airborne), 327th Infantry, 1st Brigade (Separate), 101st Airborne Division, which fought in the from November 1965 to November 1967.[159]: 22–3  The unit gained notoriety after investigations during the course of the war and decades afterwards revealed extensive war crimes against civilians, which numbered into the hundreds. They were accused of routine torture, execution of prisoners and the intentional killing of civilians. US army investigators concluded that many of the alleged war crimes took place.[160]
Operation Speedy Express War Crimes (Various crimes)(disputed) 9th Infantry Division (US Army) under General Julian Ewell A six-month operation across several provinces in the Mekong Delta, which were internally reported between 5,000 and 7,000 civilian casualties. The official U.S. body count was 10,889 enemy combatants killed with 748 weapons recovered. The commander of the 9th Division, MG Ewell, was allegedly known to be obsessed with body counts and favorable kill ratios and said «the hearts and minds approach can be overdone….in the delta the only way to overcome VC control and terror is with brute force applied against the VC». David Hackworth, a battalion commander during Speedy Express, said «a lot of innocent Vietnamese civilians got slaughtered because of the Ewell-Hunt drive to have the highest count in the land.»[161][162][163]
Brigadier General John W. Donaldson Murder 11th Infantry Brigade

Commander: Brigadier General John W. Donaldson

On 2 June 1971, Donaldson was charged with the murder of six Vietnamese civilians but was acquitted due to lack of evidence. In 13 separate incidences John Donaldson was reported to have flown over civilian areas shooting at civilians. He was the first U.S. general charged with war crimes since General Jacob H. Smith in 1902 and the highest ranking American to be accused of war crimes during the Vietnam War.[164] The charges were dropped due to lack of evidence.
  • «Vietnam War Crimes Working Group»[165] – Briefly declassified (1994) and subsequently reclassified (2002) documentary evidence compiled by a Pentagon task force detailing endemic war crimes committed by U.S. soldiers in Vietnam. Substantiating 320 incidents by Army investigators, includes seven massacres from 1967 through 1971 in which at least 137 South Vietnamese civilians died (not including the ones at My Lai), 78 other attacks on noncombatants in which at least 57 were killed, 56 wounded and 15 sexually assaulted, and 141 instances in which U.S. soldiers tortured civilian detainees or prisoners of war.[citation needed]

South Korean perpetrated crimesEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Vietnam War South Korea
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Bình An/Tây Vinh massacre massacre (disputed) South Korea Around 1,004 civilians were purported to have been killed between 12 February and 17 March 1966, as part of Operation Masher.[166][167]
Binh Tai Massacre massacre (disputed) South Korea This was a massacre purportedly conducted on 9 October 1966 of 29 to 168 South Vietnamese villagers in Binh Tai village of Bình Định Province in South Vietnam.[168][169][170]
Bình Hòa massacre massacre (disputed) South Korea This was a massacre purportedly conducted between December 3–6, 1966, of 430 unarmed citizens in Bình Hòa village, Quảng Ngãi Province in South Vietnam.[171][172][173]
Hà My massacre massacre (disputed) South Korea This was a massacre purportedly conducted by the South Korean Marines on 25 February 1968 of 135 civilians in Hà My village, Quảng Nam Province in South Vietnam.[174]
Phong Nhị and Phong Nhất massacre massacre (disputed) South Korea This was a massacre purportedly conducted by the 2nd Marine Division of the South Korean Marines on 12 February 1968 of 69 to 79 unarmed citizens in Phong Nhị and Phong Nhất village, Điện Bàn District of Quảng Nam Province in South Vietnam.[175][176]

North Vietnamese and Vietcong perpetrated crimesEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Vietnam War People’s Army of Vietnam and Viet Cong
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
VC/PAVN terrorism Murder and kidnapping Viet Cong and People’s Army of Vietnam VC/PAVN forces murdered between 106,000 and 227,000 civilians between 1954 and 1975 in South Vietnam.[177] VC terror squads, in the years 1967 to 1972, were claimed by the US Department of Defense as having assassinated at least 36,000 people and abducted almost 58,000 people.[178] Statistics for 1968–72 suggest that «about 80 percent of the terrorist victims were ordinary civilians and only about 20 percent were government officials, policemen, members of the self-defence forces or pacification cadres.»[179]
U.S. Embassy bombing Terrorist bombing Viet Cong On 30 March 1965 the Viet Cong detonated a car bomb in the street outside the U.S. Embassy in Saigon killing two Americans, 19 Vietnamese and one Filipino and injuring 183 others[180]
1965 Saigon bombing Terrorist bombing Viet Cong On 25 June 1965 the Viet Cong detonated a bomb on a floating restaurant «My Canh Café» on the banks of the Saigon River. 31–32 people were killed, and 42 were wounded. Of the casualties, 13 were American and most others were Vietnamese citizens. Another bomb exploded next to a tobacco stall on the riverbank near the restaurant, killing at least one American.[181]
Đắk Sơn massacre massacre Viet Cong On December 5, 1967, two battalions of Viet Cong were reported to have killed 252 civilians in a «vengeance» attack on the hamlet of Đắk Sơn, home to over 2,000 Montagnards. Its alleged that the Vietcong believed that the hamlet had at one point given aid to refugees fleeing Viet Cong forces.[182]
Massacre at Huế massacre People’s Army of Vietnam and Viet Cong During the months and years that followed the Battle of Huế, which began on January 31, 1968, and lasted a total of 28 days, dozens of mass graves were discovered in and around Huế. North Vietnamese troops executed between 2,800 and 6,000 civilians and prisoners of war.[183] Victims were found bound, tortured, and sometimes apparently buried alive.[184][185][186]
Son Tra massacre massacre Viet Cong On the night of 28/9 June 1968 the Viet Cong attacked Sơn Trà, a fishing village located approximately 5 miles (8.0 km) southeast of Chu Lai Base Area. It had a population of approximately 4,000 people including many resettled refugees. After a mortar attack which forced many of the civilians to take shelter in their defensive bunkers, between 75 and 300 VC then moved through the village throwing satchel charges into bunkers killing their occupants and starting fires killing 73 civilians and 15 pacification workers; a further 103 civilians were wounded. 570 homes were destroyed in the attack and the resulting fires leaving almost 2,800 people homeless.[187]
Thanh My massacre massacre Viet Cong In the early morning of 11 June 1970 the Viet Cong launched a coordinated attack on Phu Thanh village, a complex of several hamlets, straddling Highway 1 about 3 miles (4.8 km) north of Landing Zone Baldy. Two groups of sappers entered the village, armed with grenades and satchel charges, most began burning houses and hurling their grenades and satchel charges into family bomb shelters filled with civilians who had fled to them for protection from the shelling. Civilian casualties totalled 74 dead, many of them women and children; 60 severely injured; and over 100 lightly wounded with 156 houses destroyed and 35 damaged.[188]: 177–9 
Duc Duc massacre massacre People’s Army of Vietnam On 29 March 1971 the PAVN attacked Duc Duc in Quảng Nam Province systematically destroying the civilian hamlets with satchel charges and by setting fires. 103 civilians died in the blazing hamlets; 96 were injured and 37 kidnapped. At least 1,500 homes were destroyed.[188]: 231–2 
Shelling of Highway 1 Indiscriminate fire People’s Army of Vietnam From 29 April to 2 May 1972 indiscriminate PAVN fire on civilians fleeing Quảng Trị down Highway 1 killed over 2,000 civilians.[189]
Shelling of Cai Lay schoolyard Indiscriminate fire Viet Cong On 30 August 1973 during a Viet Cong attack on South Vietnamese positions mortar fire hit a schoolyard killing approximately 20 civilians.[190]
  • Up to 155,000 refugees fleeing the final North Vietnamese Spring Offensive were alleged to have been killed or abducted on the road to Tuy Hòa in 1975.[191]

1965 Indo-Pakistani WarEdit

  • Sepoy Maqbool Hussain was a Pakistani soldier who was wounded and captured by Indian forces during the 1965 War. For the next 40 years, Maqbool was deprived of his rights and was subjected to violent torture during which his Indian counterparts pulled out his finger nails, cut out his tongue since he didn’t chant anti Pakistan slogans and various other brutal acts which would’ve been a violation of the Geneva accords.[192][193][194]

Late 1960s – 1998: The TroublesEdit

  • War crimes: Various unarmed male civilians (some of whom were named during a 2013 television programme) were shot, two of them (Patrick McVeigh, Daniel Rooney) fatally, in 1972, allegedly by the Military Reaction Force (MRF), an undercover military unit tasked with targeting Irish Republican Army paramilitaries during the last installment of the Troubles. Two brothers, whose names and casualty status were not mentioned in an article regarding the same matter in The Irish Times, ran a fruit stall in west Belfast, and were shot after being mistaken for IRA paramilitaries.[195]
  • War crimes: The British security forces employed widespread torture and waterboarding on prisoners in Northern Ireland during interrogations in the 1970s. Liam Holden was wrongfully arrested by the security forces for the murder of a British Army soldier and became the last person in the United Kingdom to be sentenced to hang after being convicted in 1973, largely on the basis of an unsigned confession produced by torture.[196] His death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment and he spent 17 years behind bars. On 21 June 2012, in the light of CCRC investigations which confirmed that the methods used to extract confessions were unlawful,[197] Holden had his conviction quashed by the Court of Appeal in Belfast, at the age of 58.[198][199] Former Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) interrogators during the Troubles admitted that beatings, the sleep deprivation, waterboarding, and the other tortures were systematic, and were, at times, sanctioned at a very high level within the force.[200]
  • War crimes: The British Army and the RUC also operated under a shoot-to-kill policy in Northern Ireland, under which suspects were alleged to have been deliberately killed without any attempt to arrest them. In four separate cases considered by the European court of human rights – involving the deaths of ten IRA men, a Sinn Féin member and a civilian – seven judges ruled unanimously that Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to life had been violated by Britain.[201]
  • War crimes: British soldiers and police colluded with loyalist paramilitaries,[202] such as the attacks by the Glenanne group, which carried out a string of attacks against Irish Catholics and nationalists in an area of Northern Ireland known as the «murder triangle» and also carried out some attacks in the Republic of Ireland.[203][204] Evidence suggests that the group was responsible for the deaths of about 120 civilians.[205] The Cassel Report investigated 76 killings attributed to the group and found evidence that British security forces were involved in 74 of those.[206] One former member, RUC officer John Weir, said his superiors knew of the group’s activities but allowed it to continue.[207][208] Attacks attributed to the group include the Dublin and Monaghan bombings (which killed 34 civilians), the Miami Showband killings, the Reavey and O’Dowd killings and the Hillcrest Bar bombing.[127][209]

1971 Bangladesh Liberation WarEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
1971 Bangladesh War Pakistan
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
1971 Bangladesh genocide War crimes, crimes against humanity, crime of genocide (murder of civilians; genocide) Allegedly the Pakistan Government, and the Pakistan Army and its local collaborators. A case was filed in the Federal Court of Australia on September 20, 2006, for crimes of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.[210] Starting in 2010, numerous perpetrators were imprisoned and executed for their involvement under the jurisdiction of the International Crimes Tribunal. During the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971, widespread atrocities were committed against the Bengali population of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). With 1–3 million people killed in nine months, ‘genocide’ is the term that is used to describe the event in almost every major publication and newspaper.[211][212] Although the word ‘genocide’ was and is still used frequently amongst observers and scholars of the events that transpired during the 1971 war, the allegations that a genocide took place during the Bangladesh War of 1971 were never investigated by an international tribunal set up under the auspices of the United Nations, due to complications arising from the Cold War. Starting from 2010, indictments were issued to numerous participants. Several of them has since been executed or imprisoned.
Civilian Casualties War crimes (mass murder of civilians) Several imprisoned and executed under the jurisdiction of the International Crimes Tribunal since 2010. The number of civilians that died in the liberation war of Bangladesh is not known in any reliable accuracy. There has been a great disparity in the casualty figures put forth by Pakistan on one hand (26,000, as reported in the now discredited Hamoodur Rahman Commission[213]) and India and Bangladesh on the other hand (From 1972 to 1975 the first post-war prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, estimated that 3 million died[214]). This is the figure officially maintained by the Government of Bangladesh. Most scholarship on the topic estimate the number killed to be between 1 and 3 million.[215] A further eight to ten million people fled the country to seek safety in India.[216]
Atrocities on women and minorities Crimes against humanity; crime of genocide; crime of torture (torture, rape and murder of civilians) Several imprisoned and executed under the jurisdiction of the International Crimes Tribunal since 2010. The minorities of Bangladesh, especially the Hindus, were specific targets of the Pakistan army.[217] Numerous East Pakistani women were tortured, raped and killed during the war. The exact numbers are not known and are a subject of debate. Bangladeshi sources cite a figure of 200,000 women raped, giving birth to thousands of war-babies. Some other sources, for example Susan Brownmiller, refer to an even higher number of over 400,000. Pakistani sources claim the number is much lower, though having not completely denied rape incidents.[218][219][213]
Killing of intellectuals War crimes (mass murder of civilians) Several imprisoned and executed under the jurisdiction of the International Crimes Tribunal since 2010. During the war, the Pakistan Army and its local supporters carried out a systematic execution of the leading Bengali intellectuals. A number of university professors from Dhaka University were killed during the first few days of the war.[220][221] However, the most extreme cases of targeted killing of intellectuals took place during the last few days of the war. On December 14, 1971, only two days before surrendering to the Indian military and the Mukhti Bahini forces, the Pakistani army – with the assistance of the Al Badr and Al Shams – systematically executed well over 200 of East Pakistan’s intellectuals and scholars.[222][223]

1970–1975: Cambodian civil warEdit

The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia for the Prosecution of Crimes Committed During the Period of Democratic Kampuchea, commonly known as the Cambodia Tribunal, is a joint court established by the Royal Government of Cambodia and the United Nations to try senior members of the Khmer Rouge for crimes against humanity committed during the Cambodian Civil War. The Khmer Rouge killed many people due to their political affiliation, education, class origin, occupation, or ethnicity.[224][225]

1973 Yom Kippur warEdit

1975-1999: Indonesian invasion and occupation of East TimorEdit

During the 1975 invasion and the subsequent occupation, a significant portion of East Timor’s population died. Researcher Ben Kiernan says that «a toll of 150,000 is likely close to the truth», although estimates of 200,000 or higher have been suggested.[226]

1975–1990: Lebanese Civil WarEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Lebanese Civil War Various
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Black Saturday War crime (200 to 600 killed) Kataeb Party On December 6, 1975, Black Saturday was a series of massacres and armed clashes in Beirut, that occurred in the first stages of the Lebanese Civil War.
Karantina massacre War crime (Estimated 1,000 to 1,500 killed) Kataeb Party, Guardians of the Cedars, Tigers Militia Took place early in the Lebanese Civil War on January 18, 1976. Karantina was overrun by the Lebanese Christian militias, resulting in the deaths of approximately 1,000–1,500 people.
Tel al-Zaatar massacre War Crime (Estimated 1,000 to 3,000 killed) Lebanese Front, Tigers Militia, Syrian Army, Lebanese Armed Forces The Tel al-Zaatar Battle took place during the Lebanese Civil War from June 22 – August 12, 1976. Tel al-Zaatar was a UNRWA administered Palestinian Refugee camp housing approximately 50,000–60,000 refugees in northeast Beirut. Tel al-Zaatar massacre refers to crimes committed around this battle.
Damour massacre War crime (Estimated 684 civilians killed) PLO, Lebanese National Movement Took place on January 20, 1976. Damour, a Christian town on the main highway south of Beirut. It was attacked by the Palestine Liberation Organisation units. Part of its population died in battle or in the massacre that followed, and the remainder were forced to flee.
Sabra and Shatila massacre War crime (460 to 3,500 (number disputed)) Lebanese Forces militia under Elie Hobeika Took place in Sabra and the Shatila refugee camp Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut, Lebanon between September 16 and September 18, 1982. Palestinian and Lebanese civilians were massacred in the camps by Christian Lebanese Phalangists while the camp was surrounded by the Israel Defense Forces. Israeli forces controlled the entrances to the refugee camps of Palestinians and controlled the entrance to the city. The massacre was immediately preceded by the assassination of Bachir Gemayel, the leader of the Lebanese Kataeb Party. Following the assassination, an armed group entered the camp and murdered inhabitants during the night. It is now generally agreed that the killers were «the Young Men», a gang recruited by Elie Hobeika.[227]
October 13 massacre War crime (500–700 killed during the fighting. Additionally at least 240 unarmed prisoners executed, including civilians) Syrian Army, Hafez al-Assad Took place on October 13, 1990, during the final moments of the Lebanese Civil War, when hundreds of Lebanese soldiers were executed after they surrendered to Syrian forces.[228]

1978–present: Civil war in AfghanistanEdit

This war has ravaged the country for over 40 years, with several foreign actors playing important roles during different periods. From 2001 until 2021, US and NATO troops took part in the fighting in Afghanistan in the «War on Terror» that is also treated in the corresponding section below.

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Civil war in Afghanistan Taliban and Al Qaeda
Incident Date Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Executions and torture after the Battle of Mazar-i-Sharif August 8, 1998August 10, 1998 War crimes; crime of torture (Murder, cruel or degrading treatment and torture; summary execution) Taliban Mass killing of the locals; 4,000 to 5,000 civilians were executed, and many more reported tortured.
Assassination of Iranian diplomats August 8, 1998 War crimes; offenses against the customary law of nations (outrages upon diplomatic plenipotentiaries and agents) Taliban Eight Iranian diplomats were assassinated and an Iranian press correspondent was murdered by the Taliban.
Murder of Ahmed Shah Massoud September 9, 2001 War crimes (Perfidious use of suicide bombers disguised as journalists (who are protected persons) in murder.) Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Al Qaeda Perfidiously used suicide bombers disguised as television journalists to murder Ahmed Shah Massoud, leader of the Northern Alliance, the leader of the only remaining military opponent of the Taliban, two days before the September 11th Attacks, constituting a failure to bear arms openly, and misuse of the status of protected persons, to wit, journalists in war zones.
Civil war in Afghanistan Northern Alliance
Incident Date Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Dasht-i-Leili massacre December 2001 War crimes (Maltreatment leading to death of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (Taliban) prisoners of war) Northern Alliance partisans Allegedly placed captured Taliban POWs in cargo containers, and did seal them, leading to deaths of those within due to suffocation and excessive heat, thereby constituting war crimes.
Civil war in Afghanistan United States Army / British Royal Marines / Australian Army
Incident Date Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Bagram torture and prisoner abuse December 2002 War crimes (Maltreatment leading to death of prisoners) United States Armed Forces homicides of at least two unarmed prisoners, allegations of widespread pattern of abuse
Kandahar massacre 11 March 2012 Murder and wounding of civilians US Army soldier:
Staff Sergeant Robert Bales
Nine of the victims were children. Some of the corpses were partially burned.
Maywand District murders June 2009 – June 2010 Murder of at least 3 Afghans US Army soldiers:
Staff Sergeant Calvin Gibbs
Staff Sergeant David Bram
SPC Jeremy Morlock
PFC Andrew Holmes
SPC Adam Winfield
SPC Corey Moore
Five members of a platoon were indicted for murder and collecting body parts as trophies. In addition, seven soldiers were charged with crimes such as hashish use, impeding an investigation, and attacking their team member who blew the whistle after he had participated in the crimes.
Brereton Report crimes 2007-2013 Murder of multiple prisoners of war Australian Special Air Service Regiment Multiple substantiated claims that prisoners of war were murdered to allow the «blooding» of junior Australian Special Air Service Regiment (SASR) troopers, in addition to events where unarmed civilians were killed. Report of investigation released in November 2020.[229] Led to disbanding of 2nd squadron of SASR and currently ongoing criminal investigation into events.
2011 Helmand Province incident 15 September 2011 Murder of a wounded prisoner British Royal Marine:
Alexander Blackman
(Description/notes missing)

During the war against the Coalition and Afghan government, the Taliban committed war crimes including massacres, suicide bombing, terrorism, and targeting civilians.[230] United Nations reports have consistently blamed the Taliban and other anti-government forces for the majority of civilian deaths in the conflict, with the Taliban responsible for 75% of civilian deaths in 2011.[231][232] The Taliban also perpetrated mass rapes and executions of surrendered soldiers.[233][234]

Following the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban has also executed civilians and captured insurgents during the ongoing Republican insurgency in Afghanistan.[235]

1980–1988: Iran–Iraq WarEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Iran–Iraq War Iraq
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Iran – Iraq War[citation needed] Crimes against peace (waging a war of aggression) No prosecutions In 1980, Iraq invaded neighboring Iran, allegedly to capture Iraqi territory held by Iran.
Use of chemical weapons War crimes, use of poisons as weapons (violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol[236]) Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal Iraq made extensive use of chemical weapons, including mustard gas and nerve agents such as tabun. Iraqi chemical weapons were responsible for over 100,000 Iranian casualties (including 20,000 deaths).[237]
Al-Anfal Campaign Crimes against humanity; crime of genocide Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal A genocidal campaign by Baathist Iraq against the Kurdish people (and other non-Arab populations) in northern Iraq, led by President Saddam Hussein and headed by Ali Hassan al-Majid in the final stages of Iran–Iraq War. The campaign also targeted other minority communities in Iraq including Assyrians, Shabaks, Iraqi Turkmens, Yazidis, Mandeans, and many villages belonging to these ethnic groups were also destroyed.[238]
Halabja poison gas attack Dutch court has ruled that the incident involved war crimes and genocide (part of the Al-Anfal Campaign); also may involve the use of poisons as weapons and crimes against humanity. Supreme Iraqi Criminal TribunalTrial of Frans van Anraat Iraq also used chemical weapons against their own Kurdish population causing casualties estimated between several hundred up to 5,000 deaths.[239] On December 23, 2005, a Dutch court ruled in a case brought against Frans van Anraat for supplying chemicals to Iraq, that «[it] thinks and considers legally and convincingly proven that the Kurdish population meets the requirement under the genocide conventions as an ethnic group. The court has no other conclusion that these attacks were committed with the intent to destroy the Kurdish population of Iraq.» Because he supplied the chemicals before 16 March 1988, the date of the Halabja attack, he is guilty of a war crime but not guilty of complicity in genocide.[240][241]
Armed conflict Perpetrator
Iran–Iraq War Iran
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Attacks on neutral shipping[citation needed] War crimes, crimes against peace (attacks against parties not involved in the war) No prosecutions Iran attacked oil tankers from neutral nations in an attempt to disrupt enemy trade.
Using child soldiers in suicide missions[citation needed] War crimes (using child soldiers) No prosecutions Iran allegedly used volunteers (among them children) in high risk operations for example in clearing mine fields within hours to allow the advancement of regular troops. One source estimates 3% of the Iran–Iraq War’s casualties were under the age of 14.[242]
Laid mines in international waters[citation needed] War crimes (hampered transit passage) No prosecutions Mines damaged the US frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts

Over 100,000 civilians other than those killed in Saddam’s genocide are estimated to have been killed by both sides of the war by R.J.Rummel.

1985–present: UgandaEdit

The Times reports (November 26, 2005 p. 27):

Almost 20 years of fighting… has killed half a million people. Many of the dead are children… The LRA [a cannibalism cult][243] kidnaps children and forces them to join its ranks. And so, incredibly, children are not only the main victims of this war, but also its unwilling perpetrators… The girls told me they had been given to rebel commanders as «wives» and forced to bear them children. The boys said they had been forced to walk for days knowing they would be killed if they showed any weakness, and in some cases forced even to murder their family members… every night up to 10,000 children walk into the centre of Kitgum… because they are not safe in their own beds… more than 25,000 children have been kidnapped …this year an average of 20 children have been abducted every week.

  • The International Criminal Court has launched an investigation and has issued indictments against LRA leaders.

1991–1999: Yugoslav warsEdit

1991–1995: Croatian War of IndependenceEdit

Also see List of ICTY indictees for a variety of war criminals and crimes during this era.

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Croatian War of Independence Yugoslav People’s Army, Army of Serbian Krajina and paramilitary units.
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Battle of Vukovar War crimes (indiscriminate shelling of city for 87 days until it was leveled to the ground. At least 1,798 killed, civilians and soldiers)[244] JNA, Serb Volunteer Guard. Mile Mrkšić and Veselin Šljivančanin sentenced by the ICTY. August 25-November 18, 1991
Ovčara massacre[245] War crimes (Over 264 civilians and wounded POWs executed after Battle of Vukovar) Serb Territorial Defense and paramilitary units. Mile Mrkšić sentenced to 20 years, Veselin Šljivančanin sentenced to 10 years. Miroslav Radić acquitted. 18–21 November 1991; bodies buried in a mass grave
Stajićevo camp, Morinj camp, Sremska Mitrovica camp, Velepromet camp, Knin camp Torture of POWs and illegal detention of civilians Milosevic indicted by the ICTY. November 1991-March 1992
Dalj killings[246] War crimes (Execution of 11 detainees) Territorial Defense of SAO SBWS under Željko Ražnatović. Dalj was also one of the charges on the Slobodan Milošević ICTY indictment. September 21, 1991; bodies buried in a mass grave in the village of Celija
Dalj massacre[246] War crimes (Massacre of 28 detainees) Territorial Defense of SAO SBWS under Željko Ražnatović. Dalj was also one of the charges on the Slobodan Milošević ICTY indictment. October 4, 1991
Lovas massacre[247] War crimes Yugoslav People’s Army, Territorial Defense of SAO SBWS and Dušan Silni paramilitary unit. Ljuban Devetak and 17 individuals are being tried by Croatian courts. Lovas was also one of the charges on the Slobodan Milošević ICTY indictment. On October 10, 1991
Široka Kula massacre[248] War crimes JNA and Krajina Serb Territorial Defense. Široka Kula near Gospić on October 13, 1991.
Baćin massacre[248] War crimes Serb Territorial Defense forces and SAO Krajina militia. Milan Babić and Milan Martić convicted by ICTY. Baćin was also one of the charges on the Slobodan Milošević ICTY indictment. On October 21, 1991.
Saborsko massacre[248] War crimes Serb-led JNA (special JNA unit from Niš), TO forces, rebel Serbs militia. Milan Babić and Milan Martić convicted. On October 28, November 7, and November 12, 1991.
Erdut massacre War crimes (killing of 37 civilians)[249] Željko Ražnatović, Slobodan Milošević, Goran Hadžić, Jovica Stanišić and Franko Simatović indicted by the ICTY. November 1991-February 1992
Škabrnja massacre[250] War crimes Serb forces. Milan Babić and Milan Martić convicted. On November 18, 1991.
Siege of Dubrovnik[251] War crimes JNA and Montenegrin territorial forces. Several JNA commanders sentenced. Shelling of UNESCO protected World Heritage site. October 1991.
Voćin massacre[252] War crimes White Eagles paramilitary group under Vojislav Šešelj, indicted by ICTY. Voćin was also one of the charges on the Slobodan Milošević ICTY indictment. 13 December 1991.
Bruška massacre[253] War crimes Serb forces. Milan Babić and Milan Martić convicted. On December 21, 1991.
Zagreb rocket attack[254] War crimes RSK Serb forces. Leader Milan Martić bragged on Television about ordering the assault, the videotape being used against him at ICTY, convicted. Rocket attack was started as revenge for Serb military defeat in Operation Flash.
Ethnic cleansing in Serb Krajina[248] Crimes against humanity (Serb forces forcibly removed virtually all non-Serbs living there-nearly a quarter of a million people (mostly Croats))[255] JNA and Serb paramilitaries. Many people, including leaders Milan Babić and Milan Martić, convicted at ICTY and Croatian courts. June–December 1991
Armed conflict Perpetrator
Croatian War of Independence Croatian Army and paramilitary units
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Lora prison camp Crime of torture, War crimes (Torture of POWs) Croatian army. Several people convicted by Croatian courts.[citation needed] Croatian internment camp for Serb soldiers and civilians between 1992 and 1997
Pakračka Poljana camp War crimes, extortion Croatian army, Ministry of Interior special forces and paramilitary formations.
Commander Tomislav Merčep, and various subordinates and accessories found guilty of war crimes by Croatian courts.[256]
November 1991-February 1992
Gospić massacre War crimes Croatian Army. Commander Mirko Norac and others convicted by Croatian courts.[citation needed] 16–18 October 1991
Operation Otkos 10[257] War crimes Croatian Army. No prosecutions 31 October – 4 November 1991
Paulin Dvor massacre War crimes Croatian Army 11 December 1991
Miljevci plateau incident War crimes (killings of 40 militiamen) Croatian Army. No prosecutions 21 June 1992; invasion and permanent occupation of territory under international protection; bodies buried in mass graves nearby
Battle for Maslenica Bridge War crimes (Killings of 490 or 491 individuals, including civilians) Croatian Army. No prosecutions 22 January – 1 February 1993; invasion of territory under international protection
Mirlovic Polje incident[258] War crimes Croatian paramilitaries. No prosecutions 6 September 1993; five men and two women, four shot dead; three burned alive
Operation Medak Pocket War crimes, Crime against peace (killings of 29 civilians and 71 soldiers;[259] wounding 4 UN peacekeepers) Croatian Army. Commanders Janko Bobetko, Rahim Ademi and Mirko Norac. Ademi acquitted, Bobetko died in the meantime, Norac sentenced to seven years. 9–17 September 1993; invasion of territory under international protection and assault on UN peacekeeping forces
Operation Flash War crimes Croatian Army. No prosecutions 1–3 May 1995; invasion and permanent occupation of territory under international protection; Western Slavonia fully taken from RSK; 53 were killed in their own homes, while 30 during the Croatian raids of the refugee colons.
Operation Storm War crimes (Killings of at least 677 civilians, 150–200,000 Serbian refugees[260]) Croatian Army. Generals Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač ultimately acquitted by the ICTY.[261][262] 4–8 August 1995
Varivode massacre War crimes Croatian Army. No prosecutions 28 September 1995

1992–1995: Bosnian WarEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Bosnian War Serb forces, Army of Republika Srpska, Paramilitary units from Serbia, local Serb police and civilians.
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Srebrenica massacre[263] Crimes against humanity;Crime of genocide (murder of over 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys) Army of Republika Srpska. President Radovan Karadžić sentenced to 40 years and General Ratko Mladić to a life in prison for genocide by the ICTY;[264] later Radovan Karadžić was sentenced to life imprisonment on appeal.[265] Following the fall of the eastern Bosnian enclave of Srebrenica the men were separated from the women and executed over a period of several days in July 1995.
Prijedor massacre[266] Crimes against humanity (3515 Bosniak and 186 Croat civilians killed and missing) Army of Republika Srpska. Milomir Stakić convicted. Numerous war crimes committed during the Bosnian war by the Serb political and military leadership mostly on Bosniak civilians in the Prijedor region of Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Višegrad massacre[267] Crimes against humanity (murder of 1,000 — 3,000 civilians) Serbian police and military forces. Seven officers convicted. Acts of ethnic cleansing and mass murder of Bosniak civilians that occurred in the town of Višegrad in eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina, committed by Serb police and military forces at the start of the Bosnian War during the spring of 1992.
Foča massacres[268] Crimes against humanity (murder of over 1513 Bosniak civilians) Army of Republika Srpska. Eight officers and soldiers convicted. A series of killings committed by Serb military, police and paramilitary forces on Bosniak civilians in the Foča region of Bosnia-Herzegovina (including the towns of Gacko and Kalinovik) from April 7, 1992, to January 1994. In numerous verdicts, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ruled that these killings constituted crimes against humanity and acts of genocide.
Markale massacre[269] War crimes Army of Republika Srpska. Stanislav Galić convicted The victims were civilians who were shopping in an open-air market in Sarajevo when Serb forces shelled the market. Two separate incidents. February 1994; 68 killed and 144 wounded and August 1995; 37 killed and 90 wounded.[citation needed]
Siege of Sarajevo[270] War crimes Army of Republika Srpska. Stanislav Galić and Dragomir Milošević, were sentenced to life imprisonment and to 33 years imprisonment, respectively. The longest siege of a capital city in the history of modern warfare. Republika Srpska and the Yugoslav People’s Army besieged Sarajevo, the capital city of Bosnia and Herzegovina, from April 5, 1992, to February 29, 1996.[citation needed]
Siege of Bihać War crimes Army of Republika Srpska. From April 1992 to August 1995.
Tuzla massacre[271] War crimes Army of Republika Srpska. ARS Officer Novak Đukić on trial. On May 25, 1995, the Serb army shelled the city of Tuzla and killed 72 people with a single shell.[citation needed]
Korićani Cliffs massacre[272][273] War crimes Serbian reserve police. Darko Mrđa was convicted. Mass murder of more than 200 Bosniak men on 21 August 1992 at the Korićani Cliffs (Korićanske Stijene) location on Mount Vlašić, Bosnia and Herzegovina[citation needed]
Ahatovići massacre[274] War crimes; crime of torture (64 men and boys tortured, 56 killed) Army of the Republika Srpska. No prosecutions. Rounded up in an attack on a village, they were tortured. Claiming they were going to be exchanged, Serb forces put them on a bus, which they attacked with machine guns and grenades on June 14, 1992. Eight survived by hiding under bodies of the dead.[citation needed]
Paklenik Massacre[275] War crimes Army of the Republika Srpska. Four indicted. Massacre of at least 50 Bosniaks by Bosnian Serb Army in the Rogatica Municipality on June 15, 1992.
Bosanska Jagodina massacre[276] War crimes Army of the Republika Srpska. No prosecutions. The execution of 17 Bosniak civilians from Višegrad on May 26, 1992, all men.
Armed conflict Perpetrator
Bosnian War Croat forces, HVO.
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible
Ahmići massacre[277] Crimes against humanity according to ICTY, (ethnic cleansing, murder of civilians) Croatian Defence Council, Tihomir Blaškić convicted. On April 16, 1993, the Croatian Defence Council attacked the village of Ahmići and killed 116 Bosniaks.[citation needed]
Stupni Do massacre[278] Crimes against humanity according to ICTY (murder of 37 civilians) Croatian Defence Council, Ivica Rajić convicted. On October 23, 1993, the Croatian Defence Council attacked the village of Stupni do and killed 37 Bosniaks[citation needed]
Lašva Valley ethnic cleansing[279] Crimes against humanity according to ICTY. (2,000 civilians killed and missing) Croatian Defence Council. Nine politicians and officers convicted, among them Dario Kordić. Numerous war crimes committed by the Croatian Community of Herzeg-Bosnia’s political and military leadership on Bosnian Muslim (Bosniak) civilians in the Lašva Valley region of Bosnia-Herzegovina, from April 1993 to February 1994.
Armed conflict Perpetrator
Bosnian War Bosniak forces, Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Incident type of crime Persons responsible
Massacre in Grabovica[280] War crimes (13 civilians murdered) Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Nihad Vlahovljak, Sead Karagićm and Haris Rajkić convicted. 13 Croatian inhabitants of Grabovica village by members of the 9th Brigade and unidentified members of the Bosnian Army on the 8th or 9 September 1993.[citation needed]
Gornja Jošanica massacre[281] War crimes (56 civilians murdered) Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. No prosecutions. 56 Bosnian Serb civilians, including 21 women and three children, in the village of Gornja Jošanica. Victims were stabbed multiple times, had their throats slit, skulls and body parts crushed or mutilated.

1998–1999: Kosovo WarEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Kosovo War Yugoslav army, Serbian police and paramilitary forces
Incident type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Račak massacre[282] War crimes Serbian police, No prosecutions 45 Kosovo Albanians were killed in the village of Račak in central Kosovo. The government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia asserted that the casualties were all members of the Kosovo Liberation Army who had been killed in a clash with state security forces.
Izbica massacre[283] War crimes Serbian police and paramilitaries, No prosecutions. 120 Albanian civilians killed by Serbian forces in the village of Izbica, in the Drenica region of central Kosovo on 28 March 1999.[citation needed]
Suva Reka massacre War crimes Serbian police. Four former-policemen were convicted and received prison sentences ranging from 13 to 20 years. The massacre took place in Suva Reka, in central Kosovo on 26 March 1999. The victims were locked inside a pizzeria into which two hand grenades were thrown. Before taking the bodies out of the pizzeria, the police allegedly shot anyone still showing signs of life.[citation needed]
Ćuška massacre War crimes Yugoslav Army, Serbian police, paramilitary and Bosnian Serb volunteers, No prosecutions. Serbian forces summarily executed 41 Albanians in Ćuška on 14 May 1999, taking three groups of men into three different houses, where they were shot with automatic weapons and set on fire.[citation needed]
Massacre at Velika Kruša[284] War crimes Serbian special forces, No prosecutions. Massacre at Velika Kruša near Orahovac, Kosovo, took place during the Kosovo War on the afternoon of March 25, 1999, the day after the NATO air campaign began.[citation needed]
Podujevo massacre War crimes Serbian paramilitaries. Four convicted and sentenced to lengthy prison sentences. 19 Kosovo Albanian civilians, all women and children, were executed by Serbian paramilitary forces in March, 1999 in Podujevo, in eastern Kosovo.
Kosovo War Kosovo Liberation Army
Incident type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Lapušnik prison camp[285] War crimes Kosovo Liberation Army; Haradin Bala sentenced to 13 years. Detention camp (also referred to as a prison and concentration camp) near the city of Glogovac in central Kosovo during the Kosovo War, in 1998. The camp was used by Kosovo Albanian insurgents to collect and confine hundreds of male prisoners of Serb and non-Albanian ethnicity.[citation needed]
Klečka killings War crime; (murder of 22 Serbian civilians) Kosovo Liberation Army, No prosecutions 22 Kosovo Serb civilians were killed by Albanian insurgents in the village of Klečka, and their remains were cremated in a lime kiln.[286]
Lake Radonjić massacre[287][288] War crime; (murder of 34 civilians) Kosovo Liberation Army, No prosecutions 34 Serbs, non-Albanians and moderate Kosovo Albanians were killed by members of the Kosovo Liberation Army near Lake Radonjić[289]
Staro Gračko massacre[290] War crime; (murder of 14 Serb civilians) Kosovo Liberation Army, No prosecutions 14 Kosovo Serb farmers were executed by Kosovo Liberation Army gunmen, who then disfigured their corpses with blunt instruments.[citation needed]

1990–2000: Liberia / Sierra LeoneEdit

From The Times March 28, 2006 p. 43:

«Charles Taylor, the former Liberian President who is one of Africas most wanted men, has gone into hiding in Nigeria to avoid extradition to a UN war crimes tribunal… The UN war crimes tribunal in Sierra Leone holds Mr Taylor responsible for about 250,000 deaths. Throughout the 1990s, his armies and supporters, made up of child soldiers orphaned by the conflict wreaked havoc through a swath of West Africa. In Sierra Leone he supported the Revolutionary United Front (R.U.F) whose rebel fighters were notorious for hacking off the limbs of civilians.
  • Current action – Indicted on 17 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity by the UN, which has issued an international warrant for his arrest. As of April 2006 located, extradited, and facing trial in Sierra Leone but then transferred to the Netherlands as requested by the Liberian government. As of the status of the main state actor in the war crimes in Liberia, Sierra Leone and the ongoing war crimes tribunal in the Hague for violating the UN sanctions, Libya’s Muamar Gaddafi was elected to the post of President of the African Union. As of late January, 2011, Exxon/Mobile has resumed explorationary drilling in Libya after the exchange of the Lockerbie bombing terrorist was returned to Libya and Libya was taken off terrorist list by the Bush administration with the legal stipulation that Libya could never be prosecuted for past war crimes(regardless of guilt)in the future.

1990: Invasion of KuwaitEdit

Armed conflict Perpetrator
1990:Invasion of Kuwait Iraq
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Invasion of Kuwait[citation needed] Crimes against peace (waging a war of aggression for territorial aggrandisement; «breach of international peace and security» (UN Security Council Resolution 660)) No prosecutions Did conspire to levy and did levy a war of aggression against Kuwait, a sovereign state, took it by force of arms, did occupy it, and did annex it, by right of conquest, a right utterly alien, hostile, and repugnant to all extant international law, being a grave breach of the Charter of the United Nations, and the customary international law, adhered to by all civilised nations and armed groups, thus constituting Crimes against peace.

1991–2000/2002: Algerian Civil WarEdit

During the Algerian Civil War of the 1990s, a variety of massacres occurred through the country, many being identified as war crimes. The Armed Islamic Group (GIA) has avowed its responsibility for many of them, while for others no group has claimed responsibility. In addition to generating a widespread sense of fear, these massacres and the ensuing flight of population have resulted in serious depopulation of the worst-affected areas. The massacres peaked in 1997 (with a smaller peak in 1994), and were particularly concentrated in the areas between Algiers and Oran, with very few occurring in the east or in the Sahara.

1994–1996/1999–2009: Russia-Chechnya WarsEdit

During the First Chechen War (1994–1996) and Second Chechen War (1999–2000 battle phase, 2000–2009 insurgency phase) there were many allegations of war crimes and terrorism against both sides from various human rights organizations.

Armed conflict Perpetrator
First Chechen War, Second Chechen War Russian Federation
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
1995 Shali cluster bomb attack War crimes, crimes against peace (attacks against parties not involved in the war), crimes against humanity No prosecutions Russian fighter jets dropped cluster munitions on the town of Shali. Targets included a school; cemetery, hospital, fuel station and a collective farm.
Samashki massacre War crimes, crimes against peace (attacks against parties not involved in the war), crimes against humanity No prosecutions The massacre of 100–300 civilians in the village of Samashki by Russian paramilitary troops.
Elistanzhi cluster bomb attack War crimes, crimes against peace (attacks against parties not involved in the war), crimes against humanity No prosecutions Two Russian Air Force Sukhoi Su-24 use cluster munitions on the remote mountain village of Elistanzhi. The local school is destroyed with nine children inside.
Grozny ballistic missile attack War crimes, crimes against peace (attacks against parties not involved in the war), crimes against humanity No prosecutions Over 100 Chechen civilians die in indiscriminate bombing on the Chechen capital of Grozny by the Strategic Missile Troops.
Siege of Grozny War crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Thousands civilians die from bombings
Baku–Rostov highway bombing Crimes against humanity No prosecutions Low flying Russian Air Force helicopters perform repeated attack runs on a large numbers refugees trying to enter Ingushetia.
1999 Grozny refugee convoy shooting War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions OMON officers use automatic rifles on a convoy of refugees at a federal roadblock on the road to Ingushetia.
Alkhan-Yurt massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Over two weeks drunken Russian troops under the command of General Vladimir Shamanov went on the rampage after taking the town from the forces of Akhmed Zakayev.
Staropromyslovski massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Summary executions of at least 38 confirmed civilians by Russian federal soldiers in Grozny, Chechnya.
Bombing of Katyr-Yurt War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Indiscriminate bombing by the Russian Air Force of the village of Katyr-Yurt and a refugee convoy under white flags.
Novye Aldi massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions The killings, including executions, of 60 to 82 local civilians by special police unit, OMON, and rapes of at least six women along with arson and robbery in Grozny, Chechnya.
Komsomolskoye massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Chechen combantants who surrendered after the Battle of Komsomolskoye on the public promise of amnesty are killed and «disappeared» shortly after.

1998–2006: Second Congo WarEdit

  • Civil war 1998–2002, est. 5 million deaths; war «sucked in» Rwanda, Uganda, Angola, Zimbabwe and Namibia, as well as 17,000 United Nations peacekeepers, its «largest and most costly» peace mission and «the bloodiest conflict since the end of the Second World War.»
  • Fighting involves Mai-Mai militia and Congolese government soldiers. The Government originally armed the Mai-Mai as civil defence against external invaders, who then turned to banditry.
  • 100,000 refugees living in remote disease ridden areas to avoid both sides
  • Estimated 1000 deaths a day according to Oxfam:
«The army attacks the local population as it passes through, often raping and pillaging like the militias. Those who resist are branded Mai-mai supporters and face detention or death. The Mai-mai accuse the villagers of collaborating with the army, they return to the villages at night and extract revenge [sic]. Sometimes they march the villagers into the bush to work as human mules.»[291]
  • In 2003, Sinafasi Makelo, a representative of Mbuti Pygmies, told the UN’s Indigenous People’s Forum that during the Congo Civil War, his people were hunted down and eaten as though they were game animals. Both sides of the war regarded them as «subhuman». Makelo asked the UN Security Council to recognise cannibalism as a crime against humanity and an act of genocide.[292][293]

2003–2011: Iraq WarEdit

During the Iraq War
  • Blackwater Baghdad shootings On September 16, 2007, Blackwater military contractors shot and killed 17 Iraqi civilians in Nisour Square, Baghdad.[294] The fatalities occurred while a Blackwater Personal Security Detail (PSD) was escorting a convoy of US State Department vehicles en route to a meeting in western Baghdad with United States Agency for International Development officials. The shooting led to the unraveling of the North Carolina-based company, which since has replaced its management and changed its name to Xe Services.
  • Beginning in 2004, accounts of physical, psychological, and sexual abuse, including torture,[295][296] rape,[295] sodomy,[296] and homicide[297] of prisoners held in the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq (also known as Baghdad Correctional Facility) came to public attention. These acts were committed by military police personnel of the United States Army together with additional US governmental agencies.[298] In January 2014, evidence accuses British troops of being involved in widespread torture and abuse towards Iraqi civilians and prisoners.[299]
  • War crimes: 2006 al-Askari Mosque bombing by Al-Qaeda. The bombing was followed by retaliatory violence with over a hundred dead bodies being found the next day[300] and well over 1,000 people killed in the days following the bombing – by some counts, over 1,000 on the first day alone.[301]
  • The Mahmudiyah rape and killings were the gang-rape and murder of 14-year-old Iraqi girl Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi and the murder of her family by United States Army soldiers on March 12, 2006. It occurred in the family’s house to the southwest of Yusufiyah, a village to the west of the town of Al-Mahmudiyah, Iraq. Other members of al-Janabi’s family murdered by Americans included her 34-year-old mother Fakhriyah Taha Muhasen, 45-year-old father Qassim Hamza Raheem, and 6-year-old sister Hadeel Qassim Hamza Al-Janabi.[302] The two remaining survivors of the family, 9-year-old brother Ahmed and 11-year-old brother Mohammed, who were at school during the massacre, were orphaned by the event.
  • War crimes: Iraqi insurgent groups have committed many armed attacks and bombings targeting civilians. According to Iraqi Interior Minister Bayan Jabr insurgents killed over 12,000 Iraqis from January 2005 to June 2006, giving the first official count for the victims of bombings, ambushes and other deadly attacks.[303] Iraq Body Count project data shows that 33% of civilian deaths during the Iraq War resulted from execution after abduction or capture. These were overwhelmingly carried out by unknown actors including insurgents, sectarian militias and criminals.[304] See: Iraq War insurgent attacks, List of suicide bombings in Iraq since 2003 and List of massacres of the Iraq War for a more comprehensive list.

2006 Lebanon WarEdit

Allegations of war crimes in the 2006 Lebanon War refer to claims of various groups and individuals, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and United Nations officials, who accused both Hezbollah and Israel of violating international humanitarian law during the 2006 Lebanon War, and warned of possible war crimes.[305] These allegations included intentional attacks on civilian populations or infrastructure, disproportionate or indiscriminate attacks in densely populated residential districts.

According to various media reports, between 1,000 and 1,200 Lebanese citizens (including Hezbollah fighters) were reported dead; there were between 1,500 and 2,500 people wounded and over 1,000,000 were temporarily displaced. Over 150 Israelis were killed (120 military); thousands wounded; and 300,000–500,000 were displaced because of Hezbollah firing tens of thousands of rockets at major cities in Israel.[306][307][308]

2003–2009/2010: Darfur conflict; 2005–2010: Civil war in ChadEdit

During the Darfur conflict, Civil war in Chad (2005–2010)
The conflict in Darfur has been variously characterised as a genocide.

Sudanese authorities claim a death toll of roughly 19,500 civilians[309] while many non-governmental organizations, such as the Coalition for International Justice, claim over 400,000 people have been killed.[310]

In September 2004, the World Health Organization estimated there had been 50,000 deaths in Darfur since the beginning of the conflict, an 18-month period, mostly due to starvation. An updated estimate the following month put the number of deaths for the six-month period from March to October 2004 due to starvation and disease at 70,000; These figures were criticised, because they only considered short periods and did not include deaths from violence.[311] A more recent British Parliamentary Report has estimated that over 300,000 people have died,[312] and others have estimated even more.

2008–2009 Gaza WarEdit

There were allegations of war crimes by both the Israeli military and Hamas. Criticism of Israel’s conduct focused on the proportionality of its measures against Hamas, and on its alleged use of weaponised white phosphorus. Numerous reports from human right groups during the war claimed that white phosphorus shells were being used by Israel, often in or near populated areas.[313][314][315] In its early statements the Israeli military denied using any form of white phosphorus, saying «We categorically deny the use of white phosphorus». It eventually admitted to its limited use and stopped using the shells, including as a smoke screen. The Goldstone report investigating possible war crimes in the 2009 war accepted that white phosphorus is not illegal under international law but did find that the Israelis were «systematically reckless in determining its use in build-up areas». It also called for serious consideration to be given to the banning of its use as an obscurant.[316]

2009 Sri Lankan Civil WarEdit

There are allegations that war crimes were committed by the Sri Lankan military and the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam during the Sri Lankan Civil War, particularly during the final months of the conflict in 2009. The alleged war crimes include attacks on civilians and civilian buildings by both sides; executions of combatants and prisoners by the government of Sri Lanka; enforced disappearances by the Sri Lankan military and paramilitary groups backed by them; acute shortages of food, medicine, and clean water for civilians trapped in the war zone; and child recruitment by the Tamil Tigers.[317][318]

A panel of experts appointed by UN Secretary-General (UNSG) Ban Ki-moon to advise him on the issue of accountability with regard to any alleged violations of international human rights and humanitarian law during the final stages of the civil war found «credible allegations» which, if proven, indicated that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed by the Sri Lankan military and the Tamil Tigers.[319][320][321] The panel has called on the UNSG to conduct an independent international inquiry into the alleged violations of international law.[322][323] The Sri Lankan government has denied that its forces committed any war crimes and has strongly opposed any international investigation. It has condemned the UN report as «fundamentally flawed in many respects» and «based on patently biased material which is presented without any verification».[324]

2011–present: Syrian civil warEdit

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2015)

International organizations have accused the Syrian government, ISIL and other opposition forces of severe human rights violations, with many massacres occurring.[325][326][327][328][329] Chemical weapons have been used many times during the conflict as well.[330][331][332] The Syrian government is reportedly responsible for the majority of civilian casualties and war crimes, often through bombings.[325][327][333][334] In addition, tens of thousands of protesters and activists have been imprisoned and there are reports of torture in state prisons.[335][336][337][338] Over 470,000 people were killed in the war by 2017.[339]

Armed conflict Perpetrator
Syrian Civil War Syrian Government
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Civil uprising phase of the Syrian Civil War Violent suppression of peaceful protests Crimes against peace (armed suppression of popular uprising leading to war) No prosecutions (description/ notes missing)
Use of mass detention and torture of Syrian civilians and political prisoners Crime of torture, war crimes No prosecutions Amnesty International estimated in February 2017 «that between 5,000 and 13,000 people were extrajudicially executed at Saydnaya Prison between September 2011 and December 2015.»[340]
Houla massacre Crimes against humanity No prosecutions In August 2012, U.N. investigators released a report which stated that it was likely that Syrian troops and Shabiha militia were responsible for the massacre.[341]
Siege of Aleppo Crimes against humanity, mass murder, massacre, attacks against civilians, use of banned chemical and cluster weapons No prosecutions War crimes emerged during the battle, including the use of chemical weapons by both Syrian government forces and rebel forces,[342][343] the use barrel bombs by the Syrian Air Force,[344][345][346][347] the dropping of cluster munitions on populated areas by Russian and Syrian forces, the carrying out of «double tap» airstrikes to target rescue workers responding to previous strikes,[348] summary executions of civilians and captured soldiers by both sides,[349] indiscriminate shelling and use of highly inaccurate improvised artillery by rebel forces.[350][351] During the 2016 Syrian government offensive, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights warned that «crimes of historic proportions» were being committed in Aleppo.[352]
Ghouta chemical attack War crimes; use of poison gas as a weapon No prosecutions The Ghouta chemical attack occurred during the Syrian Civil War in the early hours of 21 August 2013. Several opposition-controlled areas in the suburbs around Damascus, Syria, were struck by rockets containing the chemical agent sarin. Estimates of the death toll range from at least 281 people to 1,729.
2015 Douma market massacre War crimes No prosecutions The Syrian Air Force launched strikes on the rebel-held town of Douma, northeast of Damascus, killing at least 96 civilians and injuring at least 200 others.
Atarib market massacre Crimes against humanity, attacks on civilians No prosecutions (description/notes missing)
2017 Khan Shaykhun chemical attack War crimes; use of poison gas as a weapon No prosecutions. The Syrian Government ordered an attack on the rebel-held town of Khan Shaykhun in Northwestern Syria in the early morning of 4 April 2017. The chemical caused at least 80 civilians deaths, and three medical workers were injured. The chemical caused asphyxiation and mouth foaming. It is suspected by Turkish authorities to be the poison Sarin.
Siege of Eastern Ghouta War crimes; use of poison gas as a weapon; bombardments; starvation of population under siege; attacks against protected objects (schools, hospitals)[353] No prosecutions. (description/notes missing)
2019 Turkish offensive into north-eastern Syria Summary executions, attacks against civilians No prosecutions Amnesty International stated that it had gathered evidence of war crimes and other violations committed by Turkish and Turkey-backed Syrian forces who are said to «have displayed a shameful disregard for civilian life, carrying out serious violations and war crimes, including summary killings and unlawful attacks that have killed and injured civilians».[354] Syrian Kurdish authorities accused Turkey of employing the chemical white phosphorus to target people.[355][356]
Armed conflict Perpetrator
Syrian Civil War Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
ISIL beheading incidents murder of neutral civilians; journalists; and aid workers Crimes against peace (murder of uninvolved parties); war crimes No prosecutions (description/notes missing)
Chemical attacks on Kurdish YPG War crimes; use of poison as a weapon No prosecutions (description/notes missing)
Genocide of Yazidis by ISIL Crimes against humanity (ethnic cleansing, systematic forced conversions, crime of slaving); war crimes (murder of Yazidi POWs); crime of genocide (recognized by the UN as an attempted genocide) No prosecutions (description/notes missing)

2015–present: Kurdish–Turkish conflictEdit

According to the U.S. State Department 2016 Human Rights Report, in February 2016, Turkish security forces killed at least 130 people, including unarmed civilians, who had taken shelter in the basements of three buildings in the town of Cizre. A domestic NGO, The Human Rights Association (HRA), said the security forces killed more than 300 civilians in the first eight months of 2016.[357] In March 2017, the United Nations voiced «concern» over the Turkish government’s operations and called for an independent assessment of the «massive destruction, killings and numerous other serious human rights violations» against the ethnic Kurdish minority.[358]

2020 Nagorno-Karabakh warEdit

UN Secretary-General António Guterres stated that «indiscriminate attacks on populated areas anywhere, including in Stepanakert, Ganja and other localities in and around the immediate Nagorno-Karabakh zone of conflict, were totally unacceptable».[359] Amnesty International stated that both Azerbaijani and Armenian forces committed war crimes during recent fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh, and called on Azerbaijani and Armenian authorities to immediately conduct independent, impartial investigations, identify all those responsible, and bring them to justice.[360][361]

November 2020–present: Tigray WarEdit

During the Tigray War, which included fighting between the Ethiopian National Defense Force (ENDF) soldiers and Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) forces in the Tigray Region, the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission (EHRC) described the 9–10 November 2020 Mai Kadra massacre committed by Tigray youth group «Samri» in its 24 November 2020 preliminary report as «grave human rights violations which may amount to crimes against humanity and war crimes».[362]

2022–present: Russian invasion of UkraineEdit

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, multiple buildings such as airports, hospitals, kindergartens were bombed.[363] There has been abuse of prisoners of war.[citation needed]

In April 2022 bodies of civilians murdered by Russian forces were found in the town of Bucha, which had been left after the occupation of the town. It was confirmed at least more than 300 bodies were in mass graves or stranded on the streets of the city. As of 22 April 2022 there have been more than 500 confirmed bodies.

The Siege of Mariupol started on 24 February 2022 and ended on 20 May 2022. It has been confirmed at thousands of lives have been claimed through the siege and that the city has been reduced to rubble.

On 21 April 2022, Satellite images showed mass graves around the besieged city of Mariupol. It has been confirmed at least 9,000+ bodies have been found since. On the same day Vladimir Putin ordered troops to blockade the Azovstal Steel Plant, the last Ukrainian controlled place in the besieged city of Mariupol. The steel plant had more than 1,000 Ukrainians confirmed inside of it.

On 17 March 2023, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin and Russia’s Commissioner for Children’s Rights Maria Lvova-Belova for war crimes of deportation and illegal transfer of children from occupied Ukraine to Russia.[364]

Armed conflict Perpetrator
2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine Russian Federation
Incident Type of crime Persons responsible Notes
Irpin refugee column shelling War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Russian soldiers indiscriminately fired at refugees trying to flee across a collapsed bridge. 8 killed.[365]
February 2022 Kharkiv cluster bombing War crimes, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Russian soldiers indiscriminately fired banned cluster bombs in the centre of the city. 9 died.[366]
Murder of Oleksandr Shelipov War crimes Vadim Shishimarin convicted in Ukraine Shelipov was shot by a Russian soldier on the instructions of several others.[367]
3 March 2022 Chernihiv bombing War crimes, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Russian air strike with eight unguided aerial bombs hits people waiting in line at a store to get bread. 47 dead.[368]
Siege of Mariupol War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Russian Army starts a siege of Mariupol, levelling the city to the ground. Targets include theatres, schools and maternity hospitals.[369][370] 10,000 dead in the city.[371]
Bucha massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide No prosecutions Russian Army massacres from 650 up to a thousand civilians during the occupation of Bucha.[372]
Kramatorsk railway station attack War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Russian Army missile strike at refugees trying to flee at a railway station.[373]
Kremenchuk shopping mall attack War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Russian Army missile strike at a shopping mall full of civilians.
2022 Vinnytsia missile attacks War crimes, crimes against humanity No prosecutions Russian Army’s reckless missile strikes against civilians in Vinnytsia. Dozens killed.[374]
Child abductions in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine crimes against humanity, genocide Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova indicted by the ICC for war crimes Deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia

See alsoEdit

  • Crimes against humanity
  • Crimes against humanity under communist regimes
  • Democide
  • Ethnic cleansing
  • Geneva Conventions
  • Genocide
  • Genocides in history
  • Genocide of indigenous peoples
  • The Holocaust
  • Human rights
  • International humanitarian law
  • International law
  • Laws of war
  • List of ethnic cleansing campaigns
  • List of events named massacres
  • List of genocides
  • List of most-wanted Nazi war criminals, according to the Simon Wiesenthal Center
  • List of war criminals
  • Mass killings under communist regimes
  • Mass murder
  • Military history
  • First Italo-Ethiopian War
  • Second Italo-Ethiopian War
  • First Sino-Japanese War
  • Second Sino-Japanese War
  • Spanish Civil War
  • Torture
  • War crime
  • World War I
  • World War II

NotesEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Comment by The Times, November 21, 2006 p. 17, in relation to Jean-Pierre Bemba of the Congo: «There was nothing funny about his soldiers’ actions in Eastern Congo… Among the crimes alleged are mass murder, rape, and acts of cannibalism. Yet one senior UN diplomat has indicated privately that for the sake of peace, the investigation [by the International Criminal Court] into Bemba’s responsibility may be sidelined. It isn’t just in Congo that trade-offs are being made. […] Skeptics point out that those who have stood trial so far have either been defeated in war or are retired and irrelevant. They insist there would be no chance of hauling powerful political figures in Washington and London before a court to answer for their actions…»
  2. ^ Wessels, André (2010). A Century of Postgraduate Anglo-Boer War (1899–1902) Studies: Masters’ and Doctoral Studies Completed at Universities in South Africa, in English-speaking Countries and on the European Continent, 1908–2008. African Sun Media. p. 32. ISBN 978-1-920383-09-1.
  3. ^ Ron Briley (2019). Talking American History: An Informal Narrative History of the United States. p. 247. ISBN 9781611395839.
  4. ^ Catherine Cocks; Peter C. Holloran; Alan Lessoff (13 March 2009). Historical Dictionary of the Progressive Era. p. 332. ISBN 9780810862937.
  5. ^ Jane Dailey (2019). Building the American Republic, Volume 2: A Narrative History from 1877. p. 44. ISBN 9780226300962.
  6. ^ Kenneth C. Davis (2015). The Hidden History of America at War: Untold Tales from Yorktown to Fallujah. p. 141. ISBN 9781401330781.
  7. ^ Jeffrey W. Meiser (2 February 2015). Power and Restraint: The Rise of the United States, 1898–1941. p. 67. ISBN 9781626161771.
  8. ^ Zinn, Howard (2003). A People’s History of the United States. New York City: The New Press. p. 230. ISBN 978-1-56584-826-9.
  9. ^ «President Retires Gen. Jacob H. Smith» (PDF). The New York Times. 1902-07-17. Retrieved 2008-03-30.
  10. ^ Melshen, Paul. «Littleton Waller Tazewell Waller». Archived from the original on 21 April 2008. Retrieved 2008-03-30.
  11. ^ Nuhn, Walter (1989). Sturm über Südwest. Der Hereroaufstand von 1904 (in German). Koblenz, Germany: Bernard & Graefe-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-7637-5852-4.[page needed]
  12. ^ Schaller, Dominik J. (2008). Moses, A. Dirk (ed.). From Conquest to Genocide: Colonial Rule in German Southwest Africa and German East Africa [Empire, Colony Genocide: Conquest, Occupation, and Subaltern Resistance in World History] (first ed.). Oxford: Berghahn Books. p. 296. ISBN 978-1-84545-452-4. see his footnotes to German language sources citation #1 for Chapter 13.
  13. ^ Schaller, Dominik J. (2008). From Conquest to Genocide: Colonial Rule in German Southwest Africa and German East Africa. New York: Berghahn Books. p. 296. ISBN 978-1-84545-452-4.
  14. ^ Friedrichsmeyer, Sara L.; Lennox, Sara; Zantop, Susanne M. (1998). The Imperialist Imagination: German Colonialism and Its Legacy. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-472-09682-4.
  15. ^ Baronian, Marie-Aude; Besser, Stephan; Jansen, Yolande, eds. (2007). Diaspora and Memory: Figures of Displacement in Contemporary Literature, Arts and Politics. Thamyris, Intersecting Place, Sex and Race, Issue 13. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill/Rodopi. p. 33. ISBN 978-9042021297. ISSN 1381-1312.
  16. ^ Gewald, J. B. (2000). «Colonization, Genocide and Resurgence: The Herero of Namibia, 1890–1933». In Bollig, M.; Gewald, J. B. (eds.). People, Cattle and Land: Transformations of a Pastoral Society in Southwestern Africa. Cologne, Germany: Köppe. pp. 167, 209. hdl:1887/4830. ISBN 978-3-89645-352-5.
  17. ^ Olusoga, David [unspecified role] (October 2004). Namibia – Genocide and the Second Reich. Real Genocides. BBC Four.
  18. ^ Dictionary of Genocide: M-Z Samuel Totten, Paul Robert Bartrop, Steven L. Jacobs, page 272, Greenwood 2007
  19. ^ Cocker, Mark (1998). Rivers of blood, rivers of gold: Europe’s conflict with tribal peoples. London: Jonathan Cape. p. 308. ISBN 978-0-224-03884-3.
  20. ^ Jan-Bart Gewald (1998) Herero heroes: a socio-political history of the Herero of Namibia, 1890-1923, James Currey, Oxford ISBN 978-0-82141-256-5
  21. ^ Peace and freedom, Volume 40, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, page 57, The Section, 1980
  22. ^ Biondich, Mark (20 October 2016). «The Balkan Wars: violence and nation-building in the Balkans, 1912–13». Journal of Genocide Research. 18 (4): 389–404. doi:10.1080/14623528.2016.1226019. S2CID 79322539. Retrieved 10 April 2022.
  23. ^ Levene, Mark (2018). ««The Bulgarians Were the Worst!» Reconsidering the Holocaust in Salonika within a Regional History of Mass Violence». The Holocaust in Greece. Cambridge University Press. p. 54. ISBN 978-1-108-47467-2.
  24. ^ Farrar, L L Jr. (2003). «Aggression versus apathy: The limits of nationalism during the Balkan Wars, 1912-1913». East European Quarterly. 37 (3): 257–280. ProQuest 195176627.
  25. ^ Michail, Eugene (2017). «The Balkan Wars in Western Historiography, 1912–2012». The Balkan Wars from Contemporary Perception to Historic Memory. Springer International Publishing. pp. 319–340. ISBN 978-3-319-44642-4.
  26. ^ United States Department of State (1943). Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 115. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
  27. ^ International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars; Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Division of Intercourse and Education (1 January 1914). «Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan War». Washington, D.C. : The Endowment. Retrieved 6 September 2016 – via Internet Archive.
  28. ^ a b «Leo Freundlich: Albania’s Golgotha». Archived from the original on May 31, 2012.
  29. ^ Hudson, Kimberly A. (5 March 2009). Justice, Intervention, and Force in International Relations: Reassessing Just War Theory in the 21st Century. Taylor & Francis. p. 128. ISBN 9780203879351. Retrieved 6 September 2016 – via Google Books.
  30. ^ «Archbishop Lazër Mjeda: Report on the Serb Invasion of Kosova and Macedonia». Archived from the original on March 3, 2016.
  31. ^ Bessel, Richard (2006). No Man’s Land of Violence: Extreme Wars in the 20th Century. Wallstein Verlag. p. 226. ISBN 978-3-89244-825-9. Retrieved 24 December 2019.
  32. ^ Tatum, Dale C. (2010). Genocide at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century: Rwanda, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Darfur. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-230-62189-3. Retrieved 3 January 2020.
  33. ^ Philip J. Cohen, Islamic Studies
    Vol. 36, No. 2/3, Special Issue: Islam in the Balkans (1997), p. 4.
  34. ^ Cohen, Philip J. (1996). Serbia’s Secret War: Propaganda and the Deceit of History. Texas A&M University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-89096-760-7. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  35. ^ «Albanian Peasants Burned by Servians: New Rulers Task». British Newspaper Archive. 2 February 1914. p. 9. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  36. ^ Biserko, Sonja; Perović, Latinka; Roksandić, Drago; Velikonja, Mitja; Hoepken, Wolfgang; Bieber, Florian; Sofrenović, Sheila; Hrašovec, Ivan (2017). Yugoslavia from a Historical Perspective (PDF). Belgrade: Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia. pp. 272–73. ISBN 978-86-7208-208-1. Retrieved 8 April 2020.
  37. ^ Гоцев, Димитър. Национално-освободителната борба в Македония 1912-1915, София 1981, с. 51 (Gotsev, Dimitar. The National Liberation Struggle in Macedonia, Sofia 1981, p. 51)
  38. ^ United States. Department of the Army (1992). PAM 550-99 Yugoslavia: A Country Study.
  39. ^ Spencer C. Tucker; Priscilla Mary Roberts (October 25, 2005). World War I: A Student Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 1074. ISBN 1-85109-879-8.
  40. ^ Association, American Bar (September 1960). ABA Journal. American Bar Association.
  41. ^ Telford Taylor (November 1, 1993). The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir. Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 0-316-83400-9. Retrieved 20 June 2013.
  42. ^ Thomas Graham; Damien J. Lavera (May 2003). Cornerstones of Security: Arms Control Treaties in the Nuclear Era. University of Washington Press. pp. 7–9. ISBN 0-295-98296-9. Retrieved 5 July 2013.
  43. ^ «Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly Resolution, April 24, 1998». Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  44. ^ Ferguson, Niall. The War of the World: Twentieth-Century Conflict and the Descent of the West. New York: Penguin Press, 2006 p. 177 ISBN 1-59420-100-5
  45. ^ «A Letter from The International Association of Genocide Scholars». Archived from the original on June 4, 2007.
  46. ^ Kamiya, Gary (2007-10-16). «Genocide: An inconvenient truth». Salon. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  47. ^ «Genocide Deniers | History News Network». hnn.us. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  48. ^ Kifner, John. «Armenian Genocide of 1915: An Overview — New York Times». archive.nytimes.com. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  49. ^ «Q&A: Armenian ‘genocide’«. BBC News. 2006-10-12. Archived from the original on 2007-03-01. Retrieved 2009-03-05.
  50. ^ Halpern, Paul G. (1994). A Naval History of World War I. Routledge, p. 301; ISBN 1-85728-498-4
  51. ^ Hadley, Michael L. (1995). Count Not the Dead: The Popular Image of the German Submarine. McGill-Queen’s Press, p. 36; ISBN 0-7735-1282-9.
  52. ^ Bruce Pannier (2 August 2006). «Kyrgyzstan: Victims Of 1916 ‘Urkun’ Tragedy Commemorated». RFE/RL. Retrieved 2006-08-02.
  53. ^ «Kyrgyzstan Renames Soviet-Era October Revolution Day, Lengthens Holiday». RFE/RL. 2 November 2017. Retrieved 2018-03-27.
  54. ^ Rummel, R.J. «Chapter 12. Statistics Of Russian Democide: Estimates, Calculations, And Sources». Statistics Of Democide: Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900.
  55. ^ «Russian Democide: Estimates, Sources, and Calculations». hawaii.edu. Row 30. Retrieved 2018-11-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  56. ^
    Irina Pushkareva
    1984
  57. ^ Merten, Ulrich (2015). Voices from the Gulag: the Oppression of the German Minority in the Soviet Union. Lincoln Nebraska: American Historical Society. pp. 77–80, 82. ISBN 978-0-692-60337-6.
  58. ^ Mitrović, Andrej (2007). Serbia’s Great War, 1914–1918. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press. pp. 222–223. ISBN 978-1-55753-477-4.
  59. ^ Pissari, Milovan (2013). «Bulgarian Crimes against Civilians in Occupied Serbia during the First World War» (PDF). Balcanica. Institute for Balkan Studies (44): 357–390. doi:10.2298/BALC1344357P. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
  60. ^ Alcenat, Westenly. «The Case for Haitian Reparations». Jacobin. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
  61. ^ «U.S. Invasion and Occupation of Haiti, 1915–34». United States Department of State. 2007-07-13. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
  62. ^ a b c d e f g h Belleau, Jean-Philippe (25 January 2016). «Massacres perpetrated in the 20th Century in Haiti». United States Department of State. Sciences Po. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
  63. ^ Rada, Javier (September 2006). «Los últimos de Alhucemas» (in Spanish). 20minutos.es. Retrieved 2007-04-13. Durante la guerra del Rif (1921–1927), la última pesadilla colonial, España fue una de las primeras potencias en utilizar armas químicas contra población civil.
  64. ^ Noguer, Miquel (July 2005). «ERC exige que España pida perdón por el uso de armas químicas en la guerra del Rif». El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 2007-04-13. Tras tan estrepitosa derrota, el ejército español no tuvo reparos en utilizar productos como fosgeno, difosgeno, cloropicrina o el mismo gas mostaza contra la población civil.
  65. ^ a b Enrique Cerro Aguilar. «España fue el primer país que utilizó armas químicas contra civiles en Marruecos en 1920». Revista Rebelión. 13 de enero de 2001. (in Spanish)
  66. ^ Miguel Alonso; Alan Kramer; Javier Rodrigo (2019). Fascist Warfare, 1922–1945: Aggression, Occupation, Annihilation. Springer International Publishing. p. 32. ISBN 978-3030276478.
  67. ^ Susan Martin-Márquez (2008). Disorientations: Spanish Colonialism in Africa and the Performance of Identity. Yale University Press. p. 193.
  68. ^ Julio Albi de la Cuesta, En torno a Annual (Ministerio de Defensa de España, 2016) pp. 432 — 439
  69. ^ Mann, Michael (2006). The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge University Press. p. 309. ISBN 9780521538541.
  70. ^ Duggan, Christopher (2007). The Force of Destiny: A History of Italy Since 1796. New York: Houghton Mifflin. p. 497.
  71. ^ Cardoza, Anthony L. (2006). Benito Mussolini: the first fascist. Pearson Longman. p. 109.
  72. ^ Geoff Simons, Tam Dalyell (British Member of Parliament, forward introduction). Libya: the struggle for survival. St. Martin’s Press, 1996, pg. 129.
  73. ^ Rummel, Rudolph (1994), Death by Government.
  74. ^ Valentino, Benjamin A. Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth Century. Cornell University Press. 8 December 2005. p. 88
  75. ^ Barnouin, Barbara and Yu Changgen. Zhou Enlai: A Political Life Archived 25 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2006. ISBN 962-996-280-2. Retrieved 12 November 2022. p. 38
  76. ^ a b c Karl, Rebecca E. (2010). Mao Zedong and China in the twentieth-century world : a concise history. Durham [NC]: Duke University Press. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-8223-4780-4. OCLC 503828045.
  77. ^ Mitter, Rana (2020). China’s good war : how World War II is shaping a new nationalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0-674-98426-4. OCLC 1141442704.
  78. ^ Feigon, Lee (2002). Mao: A Reinterpretation. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee. pp. 51–53. ISBN 978-1566634588.
  79. ^ Opper, Marc (2018). «Revolution Defeated: The Collapse of the Chinese Soviet Republic». Twentieth-Century China. 43 (1): 60. doi:10.1353/tcc.2018.0003. S2CID 148775889.
  80. ^ Opper, Marc (2020). «The Chinese Soviet Republic, 1931-1934» (PDF). People’s Wars in China, Malaya, and Vietnam. University of Michigan Press. p. 58. doi:10.3998/mpub.11413902. ISBN 9780472131846. JSTOR 10.3998/mpub.11413902.8. S2CID 211359950. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-01-18.
  81. ^ Halliday, Jon; Chang, Jung (30 September 2012). Mao: The Unknown Story. p. 133. ISBN 9781448156863. The Ruijin base, the seat of the first Red state, consisted of large parts of the provinces of Jiangxi and Fujian. These two provinces suffered the greatest population decrease in the whole of China from the year when the Communist state was founded, 1931, to the year after the Reds left, 1935. The population of Red Jiangxi fell by more than half a million — a drop of 20 percent. The fall in Red Fujian was comparable. Given that escapes were few, this means that altogether some 700,000 people died in the Ruijin base. A large part of these were murdered as “class enemies,” or were worked to death, or committed suicide, or died other premature deaths attributable to the regime.
  82. ^ a b Koga, Yukiko (2016). Inheritance of Loss: China, Japan, and the Political Economy of Redemption After Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 022641213X.
  83. ^ «Pomfret, John (October 2, 2009). «Red Army Starved 150,000 Chinese Civilians, Books Says». Associated Press. The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on October 2, 2009. Retrieved October 2, 2009″. Archived from the original on 25 October 2011.
  84. ^ Lary, Diana (2015). China’s Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 1107054672.
  85. ^ DeMare, Brian James (2019). Land Wars: The Story of China’s Agrarian Revolution. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-1503609525.
  86. ^ Tanner (2015), pp. 134–135.
  87. ^ Saich The Rise to Power of the Chinese Communist Party Outline Land Law of 1947
  88. ^ Scheidel, Walter (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press. p. 225. ISBN 978-0-691-16502-8.
  89. ^ a b Liu, Zaiyu (2002). 第二次國共戰爭時期的還鄉團 (PDF). Hong Kong: Twenty First Century Bimonthly.
  90. ^ Zamorani, Massimo. La strage della «Gondrand», in «Storia militare», 21, no. 236, May 2013, pp. 37–39
  91. ^ Antonicelli, Franco (1975). Trent’anni di storia italiana: dall’antifascismo alla Resistenza (1915–1945) lezioni con testimonianze [Thirty Years of Italian History: From Antifascism to the Resistance (1915–1945) Lessons with Testimonials]. Reprints Einaudi (in Italian). Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore. OCLC 878595757.
  92. ^ An account of this atrocity, known in Ethiopia as «Yekatit 12», is contained in chapter 14 of Anthony Mockler’s Haile Selassie’s War (New York: Olive Branch, 2003)
  93. ^ «Twentieth Century Atlas — Death Tolls and Casualty Statistics for Wars, Dictatorships and Genocides». necrometrics.com.
  94. ^ «Spanish Civil War». Concise.britannica.com. Archived from the original on 2008-01-18. Retrieved 2009-06-24.
  95. ^ «A revelatory account of the Spanish civil war». London: The Telegraph. 2006-06-11. Archived from the original on 2008-01-06. Retrieved 2009-06-24.
  96. ^ «Men of la Mancha». The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  97. ^ Julius Ruiz, «Defending the Republic: The García Atadell Brigade in Madrid, 1936». Journal of Contemporary History 42.1 (2007): 97.
  98. ^ César Vidal, Checas de Madrid: Las cárceles republicanas al descubierto. ISBN 978-84-9793-168-7
  99. ^ «Spanish judge opens case into Franco’s atrocities». The New York Times. October 16, 2008. Retrieved 2009-07-28.
  100. ^ «Decision of Juzgado Central de Instruccion No. 005, Audiencia Nacional, Madrid (16 October 2008)» (PDF).
  101. ^ a b c d e f g Travis, Hannibal (2013). Genocide, Ethnonationalism, and the United Nations: Exploring the Causes of Mass Killing Since 1945. Routledge. p. 138.
  102. ^ a b Dommen, Arthur J (2002-02-20). The Indochinese Experience of the French and the Americans: Nationalism and Communism in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. p. 252. ISBN 978-0253109255.
  103. ^ Valentino, Benjamin (2005). Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the 20th Century. Cornell University Press. p. 83. ISBN 9780801472732.
  104. ^ Christopher Goscha (2016). The Penguin History of Modern Vietnam. London: Penguin Books. p. 260.
  105. ^ Jean Fremigacci, «La vérité sur la grande révolte de Madagascar«, L’Histoire, n° 318, March 2007
  106. ^ Gunther, John. Inside Africa. p. 588.
  107. ^ «New documents reveal cover-up of 1948 British ‘massacre’ of villagers in Malaya». The Guardian. 9 April 2011. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
  108. ^ «Batang Kali massacre families snubbed». The Sun Daily. 29 October 2013. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
  109. ^ «UK urged to accept responsibility for 1948 Batang Kali massacre in Malaya». The Guardian. 18 June 2013. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
  110. ^ «Malaysian lose fight for 1948 ‘massacre’ inquiry». BBC News. 4 September 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2014.
  111. ^ «Britain’s My Lai? Remembering the Batang Kali massacre in Malaysia». Southeast Asia Globe. 2020-12-11. Retrieved 2021-03-08.
  112. ^ «Batang Kali killings: Britain in the dock over 1948 massacre in». The Independent. 2015-04-18. Retrieved 2021-03-08.
  113. ^ a b «The Other Forgotten War: Understanding atrocities during the Malayan Emergency».
  114. ^ Fujio Hara (December 2002). Malaysian Chinese & China: Conversion in Identity Consciousness, 1945–1957. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 61–65.
  115. ^ Pamela Sodhy (1991). The US-Malaysian nexus: Themes in superpower-small state relations. Institute of Strategic and International Studies, Malaysia. pp. 284–290.
  116. ^ : 247–249, 328, 278 
  117. ^ Lee, B-C (2012-10-15). «No Gun Ri Foundation held special law seminar». Newsis (online news agency) (in Korean). Retrieved 2020-02-18.
  118. ^ a b c d e «서울대병원, 6.25전쟁 참전 용사들을 위한 추모제 가져». Seoul National University Hospital. 2010-06-04. Archived from the original on 2013-01-20. Retrieved 2012-07-19.
  119. ^ a b c d e f Rhee Gwi-jeon (2006-08-03). «‘이름모를 자유전사의 비’ 서울대 현충탑을 아시나요 한국전쟁때 죽은 군인과 민간인 위해 1963년 세워져»민족상잔의 아픔을 담은 장소로 계속 보존할 것»«. SEGYE. Retrieved 2012-07-19.
  120. ^ «<407>서울대 병원의 대학살». New Daily. 2011-06-18. Archived from the original on 2013-02-19. Retrieved 2012-07-19.
  121. ^ «Search results for Military Legal Resources, pdf/KW-atrocities-part1.pdf, Available Online» (PDF). Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  122. ^ «STATISTICS OF DEMOCIDE Chapter 10». Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  123. ^ Heo, Man-ho (2002). «North Korea’s Continued Detention of South Korean POWs since the Korean and Vietnam Wars» (PDF). The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis. 14 (2): 141–165. doi:10.1080/10163270209464030. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-01-08.
  124. ^ a b Merrill, John (1980). «Cheju-do Rebellion». The Journal of Korean Studies. 2: 139–197. doi:10.1353/jks.1980.0004. S2CID 143130387.
  125. ^ a b Deane, Hugh (1999). The Korean War 1945–1953. San Francisco: China Books and Periodicals Inc. pp. 54–58. ISBN 0-8351-2644-7.
  126. ^ Jung Hee, Song (March 31, 2010). «Islanders still mourn April 3 massacre». Jeju Weekly. Retrieved May 5, 2013.
  127. ^ a b Kim, Hun Joon (2014). The Massacre at Mt. Halla: Sixty Years of Truth Seeking in South Korea. Cornell University Press. pp. 13–41. ISBN 9780801452390.
  128. ^ «Khiem and Kim Sung-soo: Crime, Concealment and South Korea». Japan Focus. Archived from the original on 2008-10-07. Retrieved August 11, 2008.
  129. ^ Bae Ji-sook (3 February 2009). «Gov’t Killed 3,400 Civilians During War». Korea Times. Archived from the original on 2012-10-04. Retrieved 2011-07-18.
  130. ^ «South Korea owns up to brutal past». The Sydney Morning Herald. 2007. Retrieved 2013-04-05.
  131. ^ a b c d Hwang Chun-hwa (2011-11-29). «고양 금정굴 민간인 학살…법원 «유족에 국가배상을»«. Hankyoreh. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
  132. ^ a b c d e «‘고양 금정굴 민간인 학살사건’ 유족에게 1억원 국가 배상 판결 «헌법에 보장된 기본권인 신체의 자유와 적법절차에 따라 재판받을 권리 등 침해»«. CBS. 2011-11-28. Retrieved 2011-11-29.
  133. ^ Song Gyeong-hwa (2010-07-05). «‘금정굴 학살사건’ 국가상대 소송». Hankyoreh. Retrieved 2012-01-20.
  134. ^ Charles J. Hanley (December 6, 2008). «Children ‘executed’ in 1950 South Korean killings». San Diego Union-Tribune. Associated Press. Retrieved 2012-08-30.
  135. ^ a b David Anderson (January 23, 2013). Histories of the Hanged: The Dirty War in Kenya and the End of Empire. W.W. Norton. pp. 150–54.
  136. ^ Mark Curtis (2003). WEB OF DECEIT: BRITAIN’S REAL FOREIGN POLICY: BRITAIN’S REAL ROLE IN THE WORLD. VINTAGE. pp. 324–30.
  137. ^ Caroline Elkins (2005). Britain’s gulag: the brutal end of empire in Kenya. Pimlico. pp. 124–45.
  138. ^ Anderson, David (September 2008). «A Very British Massacre» (PDF). History Today. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
  139. ^ Maloba, Wunyabari O. Mau Mau and Kenya: An Analysis of a Peasant Revolt.(Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN: 1993) pp. 142–43.
  140. ^ «Mau Mau massacre documents revealed». BBC News. 30 November 2012. Retrieved 6 December 2013.
  141. ^ Anderson, David (2005). Histories of the Hanged. W.W. Norton & Company, pg. 119–80
  142. ^ Ogot, Bethwell Allan (1995). «The Decisive Years: 1956–63»
  143. ^ Anderson, David (2005). Histories of the Hanged. W. W. Norton & Company, pg. 84
  144. ^ Windrow, Martin (15 November 1997). The Algerian War 1954–62. p. 13. ISBN 1-85532-658-2.
  145. ^ Abdelkader Aoudjit (2010). The Algerian Novel and Colonial Discourse: Witnessing to a Différend. p. 179. ISBN 9781433110740.
  146. ^ Jens Hanssen; Amal N. Ghazal (2020). The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Middle Eastern and North African History. p. 261. ISBN 978-0-19-165279-0.
  147. ^ Marnia Lazreg (1994). The Eloquence of Silence: Algerian Women in Question. p. 122. ISBN 9781134713301. Reports of French soldiers, especially members from the French Legion, cutting up pregnant women’s bellies were not uncommon during the war
  148. ^ «Prise de tête Marcel Bigeard, un soldat propre ?». L’Humanité (in French). 24 June 2000. Retrieved 15 February 2007.
  149. ^ Film testimony by Paul Teitgen, Jacques Duquesne and Hélie Denoix de Saint Marc on the INA archive website[dead link]
  150. ^ Henri Pouillot, mon combat contre la torture, El Watan, 1 November 2004.
  151. ^ Des guerres d’Indochine et d’Algérie aux dictatures d’Amérique latine, interview with Marie-Monique Robin by the Ligue des droits de l’homme (LDH, Human Rights League), 10 January 2007. Archived 30 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  152. ^ Horne, Alistair (1978). A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954–1962. p. 135. ISBN 9781590172186.
  153. ^ Gannon, James (2008). Military Occupations in the Age of Self-Determination: The History Neocons Neglected. Praeger Security International. p. 48. ISBN 9780313353826.
  154. ^ Horne, Alistair (1978). A Savage War of Peace. pp. 538. ISBN 0-670-61964-7.
  155. ^ a b c d e f Solis, Gary (1989). Marines And Military Law In Vietnam: Trial By Fire (PDF). History and Museums Division, United States Marine Corps. ISBN 978-1494297602.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  156. ^ Normand Poirier (August 1969). «An American Atrocity». Esquire Magazine. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
  157. ^ a b Tucker, Spencer C. (2011-05-20). The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and Military History, 2nd Edition [4 volumes]: A Political, Social, and Military History. ABC-CLIO. p. 1054. ISBN 9781851099610.
  158. ^ Rottman, Gordon (2008). US Army Long-Range Patrol Scout in Vietnam 1965-71. Osprey Publishing. p. 33.
  159. ^ Sallah, Michael; Weiss, Mitch (2006). Tiger Force: A True Story of Men and War. Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 0316159972.
  160. ^ Ward, Geoffrey C.; Burns, Ken (2017). The Vietnam War: An Intimate History. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. pp. 235–8. ISBN 9781524733100.
  161. ^ Lewy, Guenter (1980). America in Vietnam. p. 142. ISBN 0195027329.
  162. ^ Ward, Geoffrey C.; Burns, Ken (2017-09-05). The Vietnam War: An Intimate History. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. pp. 356–357. ISBN 9781524733100.
  163. ^ Sullivan, Patricia (August 5, 2009). «Julian J. Ewell, 93, Dies; Decorated General Led Forces in Vietnam». Washington Post. civilian casualties may have amounted to several thousand (between 5,000 and 7,000).
  164. ^ «1971 Command History Volume II» (PDF). United States Military Assistance Command Vietnam. p. J-21. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 11, 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2015.
  165. ^ Turse, Nick. Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam. New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt and Co, 2013.
  166. ^ «In Vietnam, a rare discussion of South Korean soldiers’ wartime civilian massacres». Retrieved 2018-06-08.
  167. ^ «Vietnam memorial recalls massacre by Korean troops». Retrieved 2018-06-08.
  168. ^ Armstrong, p. 530
  169. ^ Armstrong, pp. 533-534
  170. ^ «Báo Pháp Luật TP. Hồ Chí Minh». Báo Pháp Luật TP. Hồ Chí Minh (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  171. ^ «On War extra — Vietnam’s massacre survivors». Al Jazeera. 2009-01-04. Archived from the original on 2021-12-21. Retrieved 2011-07-09.
  172. ^ Wintle, Justin (2006). Romancing Vietnam: inside the boat country. Signal Books Ltd. p. 266. ISBN 1-904955-15-0.
  173. ^ «Bình Hòa Massacre». Quảng Ngãi government. Archived from the original on 2011-08-08. Retrieved 2011-07-09.
  174. ^ Kwon, Heonik. After the Massacre: Commemoration and Consolation in Ha My and My Lai. University of California Press. pg. 2.
  175. ^ «The Australian Army and the Vietnam War 1962-1972 The making of tigers: south Korea’s experience in the Vietnam War» (PDF). Australian Army. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 March 2011. Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  176. ^ Go Gyeong-tae. 잠자던 진실, 30년만에 깨어나다 «한국군은 베트남에서 무엇을 했는가»… 미국 국립문서보관소 비밀해제 보고서·사진 최초공개. Hankyoreh (in Korean). Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  177. ^ Vietnam Democide Power Kills R.J. Rummel
  178. ^ Lanning & Cragg (1993), pp. 186–188.
  179. ^ Lewy (1968), p. 273.
  180. ^ Shapira, Ian (6 May 2012). «Barbara Robbins: A slain CIA secretary’s life and death». The Washington Post. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  181. ^ «A Sailor Responds to the Bombing of the My Canh Café: 26 June 1965». Naval History Blog. Naval History and Heritage Command, U.S. Navy. 25 June 2010. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  182. ^ Spector, Ronald H. After Tet: The Bloodiest Year in Vietnam.
  183. ^ Anderson, David L. The Columbia Guide to the Vietnam War. 2004, page 98–9
  184. ^ Kendrick Oliver, The My Lai Massacre in American History and Memory (Manchester University Press, 2006), p. 27.
  185. ^ Encyclopedia of the Stateless Nations: Ethnic and National Groups around the World, edited by James Minahan, vol. 4 (Greenwood, 2002), p. 1761.
  186. ^ Pierre Journod, «La France, les États-Unis et la guerre du Vietnam: l’année 1968», in Les relations franco-américaines au XX siècle, edited by Pierre Melandri and Serge Ricard (L’Harmattan, 2003), p. 176.
  187. ^ «Headquarters MACV Monthly Summary June 1968» (PDF). Headquarters United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam. 26 October 1968. p. 33. Retrieved 18 June 2020.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  188. ^ a b Cosmas, Graham (1886). U.S. Marines in Vietnam : Vietnamization and redeployment, 1970-1971 (PDF). History and Museums Division, Headquarters, U. S. Marine Corps. ISBN 978-1494287498.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  189. ^ Van Nguyen-Marshall (2018). «Appeasing the Spirits Along the «Highway of Horror»«. War & Society. 37 (3). Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  190. ^ «New Vietcong Drive To Cut Saigon Link With Delta Reported». The New York Times. 30 August 1973. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  191. ^ Wiesner, Louis (1988), Victims and Survivors: Displaced Persons and Other War Victims in Viet-Nam, 1954–1975 Greenwood Press, pp. 318–9.
  192. ^ «Sign of valor and audacity dies: Sepoy Maqbool Hussain to be laid to rest with full honor». Dunya News. Retrieved 2020-05-08.
  193. ^ «An Immortal story: Soldier Maqbool Hussain». Daily Parliament Times. 2018-09-05. Retrieved 2020-05-08.
  194. ^ «Pakistani soldier who spent 40 years in Indian jails dies». DAWN. 29 August 2018.
  195. ^ «Army sanctioned «shoot to kill policy»«. irishtimes.com. Retrieved 21 November 2013.
  196. ^ «British army ‘waterboarded’ suspects in 70s». BBC News. 21 December 2009.
  197. ^ Henry McDonald (4 May 2012). «Man granted soldier m urder appeal following waterboarding evidence (The Guardian, 4 May 2012)». The Guardian. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  198. ^ «Murder verdict of man sentenced to death quashed». The Irish Times.
  199. ^ «Army ‘waterboarding victim’ who spent 17 years in jail is cleared of murder». BBC News. 21 June 2012.
  200. ^ «Inside Castlereagh: ‘We got confessions by torture’«. Guardian. 11 October 2010.
  201. ^ «Killing of IRA men was ‘human rights violation’«. BBC News. 4 May 2001.
  202. ^ «Loyalist paramilitaries admit collusion with army and RUC». The Irish Times. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  203. ^ The Cassel Report (2006), pp. 8, 14, 21, 25, 51, 56, 58–65.
  204. ^ «Collusion in the South Armagh / Mid Ulster Area in the mid-1970s». 2011-04-26. Archived from the original on 2011-04-26. Retrieved 2021-05-07.
  205. ^ «‘Lethal Allies: British Collusion in Ireland’» (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-02-22. Retrieved 2021-05-07.
  206. ^ The Cassel Report (2006) Archived 2015-02-20 at the Wayback Machine, p. 4
  207. ^ The Cassel Report (2006) Archived 2015-02-20 at the Wayback Machine, p.63
  208. ^ Connolly, Frank (November 16, 2006). «I’m lucky to be above the ground». Village: Ireland’s Current Affairs Weekly. Archived from the original on November 20, 2007. Retrieved 2006-11-16.
  209. ^ The Cassel Report (2006) Archived 2015-02-20 at the Wayback Machine, p. 8
  210. ^ «Immigration Citizenship-Australia». Rayimmigration.com.au. Archived from the original on 2009-12-14. Retrieved 2011-01-01.
  211. ^ «The Jamaat Talks Back». The Bangladesh Observer (Editorial). 30 December 2005. Archived from the original on 2007-01-23. Retrieved 2006-04-15.
  212. ^ «::: Star Weekend Magazine :::». www.thedailystar.net. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  213. ^ a b «Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report». www.bangla2000.com. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  214. ^ F. Hossain Genocide 1971 Archived 2006-04-16 at the Wayback Machine Correspondence with the Guinness Book of Records on the number of dead
  215. ^ «WAR STATS REDIRECT». users.erols.com. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  216. ^ «STATISTICS OF PAKISTAN’S DEMOCIDE». www.hawaii.edu. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  217. ^ U.S. Consulate (Dacca) Cable, Sitrep: Army Terror Campaign Continues in Dacca; Evidence Military Faces Some Difficulties Elsewhere, March 31, 1971 (Confidential, 3 pages)
  218. ^ Debasish Roy Chowdhury «Indians are bastards anyway», Asia Times, June 23, 2005.
    «In Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape, Susan Brownmiller likens it to the Japanese rapes in Nanjing and German rapes in Russia during World War II. «… 200,000, 300,000 or possibly 400,000 women (three sets of statistics have been variously quoted) were raped.»«
  219. ^ Brownmiller, Susan, «Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape»; ISBN 0-449-90820-8, pg. 81
  220. ^ Blood, Archer, Transcript of Selective Genocide Telex, Department of State, United States
  221. ^ Ajoy Roy, «Homage to my martyr colleagues» (2002) Archived 2016-10-15 at the Wayback Machine, mukto-mona.com; accessed March 30, 2018.
  222. ^ Shahiduzzaman «No count of the nation’s intellectual loss» Archived 2010-12-01 at the Wayback Machine The New Age, December 15, 2005.
  223. ^ Khan, Muazzam Hussain (2012). «Killing of Intellectuals». In Islam, Sirajul; Jamal, Ahmed A. (eds.). Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Second ed.). Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.
  224. ^ «Welcome | Genocide Studies Program». gsp.yale.edu. Archived from the original on November 11, 2005.
  225. ^ «Cambodian Holocaust Survivor». Archived from the original on June 13, 2006.
  226. ^ Kiernan, Ben. «The Demography of Genocide in Southeast Asia: The Death Tolls in Cambodia, 1975–79, and East Timor, 1975–80» Archived 9 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Critical Asian Studies. 35:4 (2003), 585–597.
  227. ^ Les Secrets de la guerre du Liban : Du coup d’état de Béchir Gémayel aux massacres des camps palestiniens, by Alain Menargues, final chapter
  228. ^ The Middle East enters the twenty-first century, By Robert Owen Freedman, Baltimore University 2002, page 214
  229. ^ Inspector general of the Australian Defence Force — Afghanistan Inquiry Report. Released Nov 2020. https://afghanistaninquiry.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/IGADF-Afghanistan-Inquiry-Public-Release-Version.pdf
  230. ^ «Taliban attack civilians to spread fear: Amnesty». Reuters. 24 April 2007. Archived from the original on 14 May 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
  231. ^ Rod Nordland (10 February 2011). «Afghan Rights Groups Shift Focus to Taliban». The New York Times. p. A6. Archived from the original on 14 June 2013. Retrieved 29 January 2014.
  232. ^ «Afghanistan – Protection of civilians in armed conflict midyear update: 1 January to 30 June 2021» (PDF). UNAMA. 2021-07-25. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-07-26. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
  233. ^ «Afghanistan: Harrowing accounts emerge of the Taliban’s reign of terror in Kunduz». Amnesty International. 1 October 2015. Archived from the original on 9 February 2017. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
  234. ^ Coren, Anna; Sidhu, Sandi; Lister, Tim; Bina, Abdul (14 July 2021). «Taliban fighters execute 22 Afghan commandos as they try to surrender». CNN. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
  235. ^ «Afghanistan crisis: Taliban kill civilians in resistance stronghold». BBC. 13 September 2021. Retrieved 2021-09-14.
  236. ^ «Security Council members condemn use of chemical weapons in Iran-Iraq conflict; demand observance of Geneva protocol». UN Chronicle. 1987. Archived from the original on 2007-12-04.
  237. ^ Link to article by the Star-Ledger
  238. ^ G. Black; Human Rights Watch; Middle East Watch (1993). Genocide in Iraq: the Anfal campaign against the Kurds. Human Rights Watch. pp. 312–313. ISBN 978-1-56432-108-4.
  239. ^ «Whatever Happened To The Iraqi Kurds?». Human Rights Watch Report. March 11, 1991.
  240. ^ Anne Penketh and Robert Verkaik (December 24, 2005). «Dutch court says gassing of Iraqi Kurds was ‘genocide» Archived 2005-12-28 at the Wayback Machine The Independent
  241. ^ «Dutch man sentenced for role in gassing death of Kurds». Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, December 23, 2005
  242. ^ Kurzman, Charles (31 October 2013). «Death Tolls of the Iran-Iraq War». Charles Kurzman website.
  243. ^ «The Times & The Sunday Times». www.thetimes.co.uk. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  244. ^ Final report of the United Nations Commission of Experts, established pursuant to security council resolution 780 (1992), Annex VIII – Prison camps; Under the Direction of: M. Cherif Bassiouni; S/1994/674/Add.2 (Vol. IV), 27 May 1994, Special Forces Archived 2010-10-20 at the Wayback Machine, (p. 1070). Accessdate 20 October 2010.
  245. ^ «Two jailed over Croatia massacre». 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  246. ^ a b (in Croatian) Državno odvjetništvo RH Archived 2008-03-19 at the Wayback Machine Priopćenje povodom obilježavanja 16. obljetnice pogibije 39 branitelja u Dalju
  247. ^ «Link leading to a downloadable booklet «Krvava Istina o Lovasu»» [Bloody Truth on Lovas] (in Croatian). Archived from the original on September 28, 2007.
  248. ^ a b c d
    http://www.un.org/icty/pressreal/2007/pr1162e.htm Summary of judgement: Milan Martić sentenced to 35 years for crimes against humanity and war crimes
  249. ^ «The Prosecutor of the Tribunal against Slobodan Milošević (p. 53, 54, 56, 57, 58)» (PDF). ICTY. 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-08-06. Retrieved 29 October 2010.
  250. ^ «Summary of judgement: the case of Milan Martić». Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  251. ^ The battle of Dubrovnik Archived 2013-10-29 at the Wayback Machine, Final report of the United Nations Commission of Experts
  252. ^ «Šešelj Indictment». Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  253. ^ ICTY, case Milan Martić Archived 2007-08-18 at the Wayback Machine, summary of judgement
  254. ^ «Prosecutors Seek Life Sentence for War Crimes Suspect Martić». Voice of America. 2007-01-10. Archived from the original on 2007-02-14. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
  255. ^ «Milosevic: Important New Charges on Croatia». Human Rights Watch. October 21, 2001. Retrieved October 29, 2010.
  256. ^ Milekic, Sven (13 February 2017). «Croatian Police Official’s War Crimes Sentence Increased». Balkan Insight. Balkan Insight. Retrieved 16 September 2022.
  257. ^ Annex IV: The policy of ethnic cleansing Archived May 4, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  258. ^ «CROATIA HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES, 1993». www.hri.org.
  259. ^ Daniel Simpson (2002-12-03). «Croatia Protects a General Charged With War Crimes». The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-10-06.
  260. ^ Republic of Serbian Krajina#Operation Storm
  261. ^ «ICTY — TPIY :: The Cases». www.icty.org. Archived from the original on 2009-03-30.
  262. ^ «War court clears Croatia generals». BBC News. November 17, 2012.
  263. ^ «Srebrenica 1995 — Preliminarni Spisak Žrtava Genocida u Srebrenici 1995. Godine» [Srebrenica 1995 — Preliminary List of Missing and Killed in Srebrenica] (PDF). Federal Commission for Missing Persons in Sarajevo. 2005.. See also Is the West really the best? (2001).
  264. ^ «UN hails conviction of Mladic, the ‘epitome of evil,’ a momentous victory for justice». UN News Centre. 22 November 2017. Retrieved 23 November 2017.
  265. ^ «UN appeals court increases Radovan Karadzic’s sentence to life imprisonment». Washington Post. Archived from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 2019-03-20.
  266. ^ Wittenauer, Cheryl (2008-01-18). «Exhibit details Bosnia ethnic cleansing». USA Today. Retrieved 2010-05-11.
  267. ^ «Resources». css.ethz.ch.
  268. ^ «Prosecutor v. Dario Kordic & Mario Cerkez — Trial Chamber III — Judgment — en IT-95-14/2 [2001] ICTY 8 (26 February 2001)». www.worldlii.org.
  269. ^ «Sarajevo massacre remembered». 2004-02-05. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  270. ^ «PROSECUTOR v. STANISLAV GALIC». www.un.org. Archived from the original on August 7, 2009.
  271. ^ «Sud Bosne i Hercegovine — Naslovna». Sud Bosne i Hercegovine.
  272. ^ https://www.un.org/icty/cases-e/cis/mrdja/cis-mrdja.pdf[dead link]
  273. ^ «Darko Mrdja — Sentencing Judgement». www.un.org. Archived from the original on March 11, 2006.
  274. ^ «Home». Institute for War and Peace Reporting. Archived from the original on 2020-04-14. Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  275. ^ «Bosnia Report – July–September 2000». Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2009-10-30.
  276. ^ Resolution 771, The First Report on the War Crimes in the Former Yugoslavia Archived 2010-09-21 at the Wayback Machine
  277. ^ «Flashback: The Ahmici massacre». BBC News. 2000-01-14. Retrieved 2010-05-11.
  278. ^ «Microsoft Word – ~8822308.doc» (PDF). Retrieved 2011-01-01.
  279. ^ «III. FACTS AND DISCUSSION». www.un.org. Archived from the original on April 26, 2009.
  280. ^ «Prlic et al. Initial Indictment». www.un.org. Archived from the original on August 2, 2009.
  281. ^ Grebo, Lamija; Dizdarevic, Emina (September 5, 2019). «Bosnian Serbs’ Deaths in Village Massacre Go Unpunished».
  282. ^ «Nato crisis talks on massacre». BBC News. 1999-01-17. Retrieved 2010-05-11.
  283. ^ «U.S.: Massacre video matches mass grave evidence». CNN. Retrieved 2010-05-11.
  284. ^ Massacre at Krusha e Madhe, Human Rights Watch Report, 4 April 1999 Archived 7 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  285. ^ «Outreach Programme — Articles published by magazine Balkan — Llapushnik Camp Victims Deserve Justice, 17 November 2004». www.un.org. Archived from the original on June 14, 2009.
  286. ^ «Serbs highlight ‘KLA atrocity’«. BBC. August 29, 1998. Retrieved April 2, 2013.
  287. ^ «Vreme 901 – Ratni zlocini: U ime zakona Leke Dukadjina». Nedeljnik Vreme. 9 April 2008. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  288. ^ «Погледи». Archived from the original on 2012-03-10. Retrieved 2012-03-24.
  289. ^ «Human Rights Watch report». Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  290. ^ «KiM: 13 godina od ubistva žetelaca». B92. July 23, 2012. Retrieved April 2, 2013.
  291. ^ The Times World News, April 3, 2006, p.29
  292. ^ «DR Congo pygmies ‘exterminated’«. 6 July 2004. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  293. ^ «DR Congo Pygmies appeal to UN». 23 May 2003. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  294. ^ Johnston, David; John M. Broder (2007-11-14). «F.B.I. Says Guards Killed 14 Iraqis Without Cause». The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-11-30.
  295. ^ a b Benjamin, Mark (2008-05-30). «Taguba denies he’s seen abuse photos suppressed by Obama: The general told a U.K. paper about images he saw investigating Abu Ghraib — not photos Obama wants kept secret». Salon.com. Archived from the original on 2009-06-11. Retrieved 2009-06-06. The paper quoted Taguba as saying, «These pictures show torture, abuse, rape and every indecency.» […] The actual quote in the Telegraph was accurate, Taguba said — but he was referring to the hundreds of images he reviewed as an investigator of the abuse at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq
  296. ^ a b Hersh, Seymour Myron (2007-06-25). «The general’s report: how Antonio Taguba, who investigated the Abu Ghraib scandal, became one of its casualties». The New Yorker. Retrieved 2007-06-17. Taguba said that he saw «a video of a male American soldier in uniform sodomizing a female detainee.»
  297. ^ Scherer, Michael; Benjamin, Mark (4 November 2003). «Other government agencies». The Abu Ghraib files. salon.com. Archived from the original on 2008-02-12. Retrieved 2008-02-24. The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology later ruled al-Jamadi’s death a homicide, caused by «blunt force injuries to the torso complicated by compromised respiration.»
  298. ^ «Other government agencies». Archived from the original on 12 February 2008. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  299. ^ «Exclusive: Devastating dossier on ‘abuse’ by UK forces in Iraq goes to International Criminal Court». Independent. 12 January 2014.
  300. ^ Worth, Robert F. (February 25, 2006). «Muslim Clerics Call for an End to Iraqi Rioting». The New York Times. Retrieved February 24, 2006.
  301. ^ «Blood on Our Hands: What WikiLeaks Revealed about the Iraqi Death Toll – By Ellen Knickmeyer | Foreign Policy». Archived from the original on January 1, 2011.
  302. ^ «Soldier: ‘Death walk’ drives troops ‘nuts’«. CNN. Aug 8, 2006. Archived from the original on 2012-10-18. Retrieved 2012-11-06.
  303. ^ Ellen Knickmeyer (2005-06-03). «Iraq Puts Civilian Toll at 12,000». The Washington Post.
  304. ^ Hicks, Madelyn Hsiao-Rei; Dardagan, Hamit; Serdán, Gabriela Guerrero; Bagnall, Peter M.; Sloboda, John A.; Spagat, Michael (2009-04-16). «The Weapons That Kill Civilians — Deaths of Children and Noncombatants in Iraq, 2003–2008». New England Journal of Medicine. 360 (16): 1585–1588. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0807240. ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 19369663.
  305. ^ «UN warning on Mid-East war crimes». BBC News Online. 20 July 2006.
  306. ^ «Hizbullah attack in northern Israel and Israel’s response». www.mfa.gov.il. Archived from the original on July 15, 2006. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  307. ^ «Middle East crisis: Facts and Figures». BBC News. August 31, 2006. Archived from the original on July 19, 2008. Retrieved December 11, 2012.
  308. ^ «Israel says it will relinquish positions to Lebanese army». USA Today. August 15, 2006.
  309. ^ Al-Ahram Weekly | Region | Old dogs, new tricks Archived 2013-05-14 at the Wayback Machine
  310. ^ Lacey, Marc (2005-05-11). «Tallying Darfur Terror: Guesswork with a Cause». International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2008-04-07.
  311. ^ «How many have died in Darfur?». 2005-02-16. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  312. ^ Darfur death toll may be 300,000, say UK lawmakers Archived 2005-04-21 at the Wayback Machine (Reuters), 30 March 2005
  313. ^ «UN accuses Israel over phosphorus». BBC News. 15 January 2009. Retrieved 16 January 2009.
  314. ^ «Gaza: Israel under fire for alleged white phosphorus use». Christian Science Monitor. ISSN 0882-7729. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  315. ^ «Israel: Stop Unlawful Use of White Phosphorus in Gaza». Human Rights Watch. 10 January 2009. Retrieved 16 January 2009.
  316. ^ Goldstone report, Goldstone report, UNHRC, para. 49
  317. ^ «Sri Lanka: US War Crimes Report Details Extensive Abuses». Human Rights Watch. 22 October 2009. Retrieved 17 January 2010.
  318. ^ «Govt.: LTTE Executed Soldiers». The Sunday Leader. 8 December 2010. Archived from the original on 2010-12-12. Retrieved 17 January 2010.
  319. ^ «Report of the UNSG’s panel of experts on accountability in SL». The Island, Sri Lanka. 16 April 2011.
  320. ^ «UN panel admits international failure in Vanni war, calls for investigations». TamilNet. 16 April 2011.
  321. ^ «Summary of UN Panel report». Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka). 16 April 2011. Archived from the original on 19 April 2011. Retrieved 22 April 2011.
  322. ^ «Sri Lankan military committed war crimes: U.N. panel». The Hindu. 16 April 2011.
  323. ^ «Leaked UN report urges Sri Lanka war crimes probe». France24. 16 April 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-05-03.
  324. ^ «The Government of Sri Lanka states that the report of the UN Secretary General’s Panel of Experts is fundamentally flawed in many respects». Ministry of External Affairs. 13 April 2011. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011.
  325. ^ a b «UN Details Rampant War Crimes By ISIS And Assad’s Regime». Business Insider. 27 August 2014. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  326. ^ Abdelaziz, Salma. «Syrian rebels blame ‘heinous’ executions on ‘extremists’«. CNN. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  327. ^ a b «Syria and Isis committing war crimes, says UN». TheGuardian.com. 27 August 2014. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  328. ^ «UN human rights probe panel reports continuing ‘gross’ violations in Syria». United Nations. 24 May 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  329. ^ «UN chief warns of Syrian civil war if massacres continue». WN. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  330. ^ «Obama: US cannot ignore Syria chemical weapons». BBC. 7 September 2013.
  331. ^ «Syria: The story of the conflict». BBC News. 2014-03-14. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  332. ^ «BBC News — Syria’s war». 2015-12-03. Retrieved 2023-01-01.
  333. ^ «UN Commission: ISIS Not The Sole Agent Of Death And Destruction In Syria». The Huffington Post. 16 September 2014. Retrieved 14 October 2014.
  334. ^ Karim Lahidji (16 March 2015). «Syria: ISIL’s brutality must not overshadow the crimes of the Syrian regime». FIDH — Worldwide Movement for Human Rights. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  335. ^ Salloum, Raniah (2013-10-10). «Spiegel, October 10, 2013». Spiegel. Retrieved 2014-05-21.
  336. ^ «Syria torture archipelago».
  337. ^ Rogin, Josh (7 July 2014). «thedailybeast 7 July 2014». The Daily Beast. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  338. ^ «inside bashar assads torture chambers». yahoo news. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  339. ^ Syria: Events of 2016. Human Rights Watch. 2017.
  340. ^ Editorial Board (February 11, 2017). «A ‘human slaughterhouse’ in Syria». The Washington Post.
  341. ^ «UN Report 15 Aug 2012». Retrieved 2013-08-31.
  342. ^ Deutsch, Anthony (13 February 2017). «Syrian government forces used chemical weapons in Aleppo: rights group». Reuters.
  343. ^ «Kurdish Officials: Rebels May Have Used Chemicals in Aleppo | Voice of America — English». www.voanews.com.
  344. ^ Hauslohner, Abigail; Ramadan, Ahmed (24 December 2013). «Middle East». The Washington Post.
  345. ^ «Assad ‘dropped 13,000 illegal barrel bombs on Syria in 2016’, watchdog says». Independent.co.uk. 11 January 2017.
  346. ^ Czuperski, Maks; Itani, Faysal; Nimmo, Ben; Higgins, Eliot; Beals, Emma (2017). Breaking Aleppo (PDF). Atlantic Council. ISBN 978-1-61977-449-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-04-13. Retrieved 2018-03-25.
  347. ^ Shaheen, Kareem (5 May 2015). «Syria war: ‘unthinkable atrocities’ documented in report on Aleppo» – via The Guardian.
  348. ^ Sanchez, Raf (25 September 2016). «Aleppo horror: dozens of civilians killed in Russian and Syrian strikes». The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2022-01-12.
  349. ^ «TORTURE WAS MY PUNISHMENT’ ABDUCTIONS, TORTURE AND SUMMARY KILLINGS UNDER ARMED GROUP RULE IN ALEPPO AND IDLEB, SYRIA». Amnesty International. 5 July 2016. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  350. ^ «Syrian Islamist rebels renew chemical attack on Kurdish district in Aleppo». Ara News. 14 March 2016. Archived from the original on 16 May 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2016.
  351. ^ Fields, Liz. «‘Hell Cannons’ Have Slaughtered More Than 300 Syrian Civilians». Vice News. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  352. ^ «‘Crimes of historic proportions’ being committed in Aleppo, UN rights chief warns». UN News Center. 21 October 2016. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  353. ^ «Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic» (PDF). United Nations Human Rights Council. 1 February 2018. pp. 20–25. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
  354. ^ «Damning evidence of war crimes by Turkish forces and allies in Syria». Amnesty International. 18 October 2019.
  355. ^ Haddad, Tareq (18 October 2019). «Turkey accused of war crimes after suspected white phosphorus use against civilian Kurds in Syria». Newsweek.
  356. ^ «UK sells white phosphorus to Turkey as evidence grows of chemical attacks on Kurds». The Times. 27 October 2019.
  357. ^ «Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2016 Turkey». U.S. Department of State. pp. 3, 22.
  358. ^ Section, United Nations News Service (10 March 2017). «UN News — Turkey: UN report details allegations of serious rights violations in country’s southeast».
  359. ^ «Both sides obliged to ‘spare and protect civilians’ over Nagorno-Karabakh fighting declares UN’s Guterres». United Nations. 2020-10-18. Retrieved 2020-10-19.
  360. ^ «Armenia/Azerbaijan: Decapitation and war crimes in gruesome videos must be urgently investigated». amnesty.org. Amnesty International. 2020-12-10.
  361. ^ Andrew Roth (2020-12-10). «Human rights groups detail ‘war crimes’ in Nagorno-Karabakh». The Guardian.
  362. ^ «Rapid Investigation into Grave Human Rights Violation Maikadra — Preliminary Findings». Ethiopian Human Rights Commission. November 24, 2020.
  363. ^ «Explosions hit Ukraine’s major airports as Russia begins invasion – video». The Guardian. 24 February 2022.
  364. ^ «Russia: International Criminal Court issues arrest warrant for Putin». UN News. 17 March 2023.
  365. ^ Lynsey Addario, Andrew E. Kramer (March 6, 2022). «Ukrainian Family’s Dash for Safety Ends in Death». The New York Times. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
  366. ^ «Ukraine: Cluster Munitions Launched Into Kharkiv Neighborhoods». Human Rights Watch. March 4, 2022. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  367. ^ «Lawyer asks Kyiv war crimes trial to acquit Russian soldier». Times of Malta. 20 May 2022.
  368. ^ «Ukraine: Russian ‘dumb bomb’ air strike killed civilians in Chernihiv – new investigation and testimony». Amnesty International. March 3, 2022. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
  369. ^ «Ukraine fears 300 people were killed in Mariupol theatre bombed by Russia as families sheltered». The Independent. Retrieved 2022-03-25.
  370. ^ AFP (March 10, 2022). «EU condemns Russian bombing of Mariupol maternity hospital as a ‘war crime’«. Times of Israel. Retrieved March 11, 2022.
  371. ^ Joe Walsh (11 April 2022). «Over 10,000 Mariupol Residents Have Died, Mayor Says—And Death Toll Could Double». Forbes.
  372. ^ «Ukraine: The children’s camp that became an execution ground». BBC News. 16 May 2022.
  373. ^ John Sparks (April 9, 2022). «Ukraine war: Kramatorsk railway station attack survivors and witnesses describe terror on the platforms». Sky News. Retrieved April 19, 2022.
  374. ^ Wright, George (14 July 2022). «Ukraine War: 23 Killed in Russian Rocket Attack on Vinnytsia». BBC News. Archived from the original on 2022-07-15. Retrieved 2022-07-15.

External linksEdit

  • 1944–1945 Killing of Allied POWs in Europe
  • A Criminological Analysis of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq By Ronald C. Kramer and Raymond J. Michalowski
  • Kramer, Alan: Atrocities, in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.

Host and founder of Thinking in English, Tom is committed to providing quality and interesting content to all English learners. Previously a research student at a top Japanese university and with a background in English teaching, political research, and Asian languages, Tom is now working fulltime on bettering Thinking in English!



Joe Biden has accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of being a “war criminal.” But what does this mean? What is a war crime”? And what makes someone a war criminal? Let’s talk about this on today’s episode of Thinking in English!  



You may also like…

Logical Fallacies: Mistakes You Probably Make When Arguing! 

142. What is an Oligarchy?  (English Vocabulary Lesson)

141. South Korean Elections Explained (English Vocabulary Lesson)

How to THINK CRITICALLY in ENGLISH!!!

(If you can’t see the podcast player CLICK HERE to listen!!)


Vocabulary List

Off-the-cuff (phrase) – if you speak off the cuff, you say something without having prepared or thought about your words first

I hadn’t prepared a speech so I just said a few words off the cuff

Rhetoric (n) – speech or writing intended to be effective and influence people

I was influenced by her rhetoric into donating to the charity 

To commit (v) – to do something illegal or something that is considered wrong

He was sent to prison for a crime he didn’t commit

Humanity (n) – understanding and kindness towards other people

He displayed no humanity to his opponent 

To ratify (v) – (especially of government or organisations) to make an agreement official 

Many countries have now ratified the UN convention on the rights of the child 

To prohibit (v) – to officially refuse to allow something 

Cars are prohibited from driving in the town centre 

To prosecute (v) – to officially accuse someone of committing a crime in a court

He was prosecuted for fraud  

Tribunal (n) – a special court who are officially chosen to examine problems of a particular type

She took her case to an immigration tribunal  

Explicitly (adv) – in a way that is clear and exact

The law explicitly prohibits stealing  

Why not support Thinking in English?

Help to support the podcast by making a one-time donation! I would love to buy a new mic, and pay for a better blog/podcast host…

Thank you so much for your donation! Reach out to me on Instagram, or by the contact form above, and I’ll be happy to thank you in person!

Donate


Help to support the podcast by making a monthly donation! I would love to buy a new mic, and pay for a better blog/podcast host

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate monthly


Help to support the podcast by making a yearly donation! I would love to buy a new mic, and pay for a better blog/podcast host…

Your contribution is appreciated.

Donate yearly

Last week, US President Joe Biden described Vladimir Putin as a “war criminal” due to the Russian army’s actions in Ukraine. After days of avoiding using such harsh language, Biden first used the term “war criminal” in an off-the-cuff reply to a reporter’s question. In response, the Kremlin described Biden’s words as “unforgiveable rhetoric.” 

At first, this might not seem like an overly significant move – Russia and the US are constantly insulting and accusing each other of multiple different wrongdoings. But the phrases “war criminal” and “war crimes” are actually very serious and influential terms. 

The US President’s advisors and aides have been quick to state that it is not an official US policy that Putin is a war criminal – instead they say that Biden was speaking from the heart after seeing images of the violence in Ukraine. There are separate processes and investigations by countries and organisations around the world that will determine whether or not Putin or his soldiers are committing war crimes during their war. 

However, Biden’s use of the words “war criminal” is incredibly significant and influential. Even if it is not official US policy yet, it is going to make it difficult for Russia and the US to work together in the future – after all, how can you work with a criminal? 

Do you want to Think in English?

I’m so excited that you found my blog and podcast!! If you don’t want to miss an article or an episode, you can subscribe to my page!


But, just before I go on with the episode, I want to quickly talk about my recent episodes. This episode is influenced by Russia’s war in Ukraine – just like my previous episodes on nuclear weapons and oligarchies. It is sad that I need to talk about these topics, but I think it is essential for English learners to have both the vocabulary and knowledge to properly understand what is happening in the war. 

So much of the information, commentary, and news is produced in English at the moment, but organisations tend to assume everyone already understands the words and concepts they are talking about. One of the reasons I started Thinking in English was to help English learners develop the skills to talk, read, and think about such complicated issues in English.

I’ve seen countless examples of people using the terms “war crimes” or “war criminals” over the past few weeks – but very few people actually truly understand what it means to be a “war criminal” or how we can prove someone is such a criminal. Just like the episode on oligarchy last week, I think understanding the concept takes more time than just looking in the dictionary.  

I try my best to base my episodes on reputable sources and evidence, as well as my own studies as a political researcher, but I always encourage you all to think critically – even about what I say!


I’ve used the terms ‘war crimes’ and ‘war criminal’ a lot already in this episode. And, if you look on social media or read online articles, saying that Russia is committing ‘war crimes’ has become incredibly common. However, most people tend to use this vocabulary without actually understanding what they are saying. There are clear and set definitions and processes that we use to determine “war crimes” and to punish those who commit them!

So, what is a “war crime”? And who is a “war criminal”? And how do we decide or determine whether or not someone has committed “war crimes”? 

The Rules of War

This might surprise some of you, but even wars have rules. Over the years, countries have come together to establish and write laws and guidelines that set out what you can, and cannot, do during a war or conflict. A “war criminal” is someone who breaks and violates such rules.

These rules of war, also known as international humanitarian law, are famously found in the Geneva Conventions, as well as other international laws and agreements. The purpose of the “rules of war” is to save lives, reduce suffering, and keep some humanity even in times of conflict. 

Wars aim to weaken the enemy – usually by gaining land, overthrowing a government, and destroying resources and infrastructure. Unfortunately, one of the consequences of war is death. International humanitarian law is designed to try and balance the need to weaken an enemy during war with the desire to limit suffering. 

The rules of law are not just something university professors have written. The core part of International Humanitarian Law is the Geneva conventions – and every single country in the world has ratified and approved the Geneva Conventions. In other words, every single country has agreed to follow the rules of law. 

They are universal. The rules of law don’t just apply to countries or national governments, but anyone fighting in a conflict – armies, political parties, militias, mercenaries, and armed civilians. Everyone must follow the rules of law. 

What are the rules of war?

When you study international human rights and humanitarian law, the specific rules of war can become quite complex and detailed. However, I’ll introduce a few of the most important parts of international humanitarian law. So, what are the rules of war?

You must protect people who are not fighting in the war. This includes civilians (normal people not part of an army), medical workers, or aid workers. You must also protect people who are not able to fight anymore. If an enemy soldier is injured or taken prisoner, they should be protected.

You must not target civilians. Armies should attack other armies, soldiers, or military facilities, not civilians and the things they use. This means, if possible, people’s homes should not be damaged, and things like water, crops, and animals should be left alone. 

Medical facilities, hospitals, and medical vehicles can not be attacked. This is the case even if they are treating injured soldiers, as injured individuals all have the right to medical care – no matter which side they are fighting for. 

Torture and the poor treatment of prisoners is illegal and banned. If an enemy soldier is captured, they must be treated fairly and not abused. They must be given food and water and allowed to contact their families. 

Certain weapons and tactics must be limited to avoid too much suffering. Some of the most famous illegal weapons include poisonous gases, biological weapons, plastic weapons (as x ray machines can’t find pieces of plastic in a body), land mines, lasers that cause blindness, and cluster bombs. These kinds of weapons are designed to cause suffering and can hurt many people, rather than just defeat the enemy.

And the rules of war clearly prohibit rape and other types of sexual violence from being used by armed forces as a tactic of war. 

Never miss an episode

Subscribe wherever you enjoy podcasts:

What Happens if you Break the Rules of Law?

If you break the rules of law, you can and often will be punished. War crimes have consequences, and are investigated both by States and international courts. Individuals, not just countries, can be prosecuted and put on trial for committing war crimes. There are generally four possible ways that war crimes are investigated and determined. 

First, the International Criminal Court (or ICC) has the responsibility to investigate and prosecute individuals who are suspected of committing war crimes. It is an intergovernmental organisation and is not part of the UN. Especially if the individual is not being charged by an individual country, the ICC can take charge of the investigation. The ICC is based in The Hague and is already investigating Russian war crimes. 

The ICC

It is important to realise, however, that there are limitations to the ICC. The court doesn’t have a police force – they can issue arrest warrants but rely on states to arrest suspects. Russia is not a member of the ICC (they left in 2016) so they would never arrest any of their own citizens for the ICC. Even if arrest warrants are issued, if the suspects stay in Russia or other countries that are not members of the ICC, they will not be on trial. And before you assume that only dictatorships and violent countries don’t join the ICC – the US never joined.

The second way to investigate war crimes is through an international war crimes tribunal supported by the United Nations. The UN has the International Court of Justice which is designed to solve disputes between countries. They can also set up war crimes tribunals, such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. This tribunal was part of the UN (unlike the ICC) and temporary: it was formed just to investigate war crimes during the Yugoslav wars. 

Third, a tribunal could also be set up by a different group of countries. As not all UN countries would support investigating Russian citizens (most obviously Russia themselves would object to it) an organisation like NATO or the EU, or just a group of countries, could perhaps set up a court to investigate war crimes. In fact, the most famous war crime court in history was this kind of organisation. 

The Nuremberg trials was set up by the UK, US, France, and Soviet Union to investigate, document, and punish Nazi war crimes after the defeat of Germany in WW2. A similar trial was also held in Tokyo to investigate Japanese war crimes. 

Finally, an individual country can also investigate war crimes. Some countries have their own laws that allow them to investigate and prosecute war crimes. For example, Germany is already investigating Putin. 

Have National Leaders Ever Been Prosecuted for War Crimes?

It is much easier to charge an individual soldier with war crimes, than it is to investigate the leader who ordered such crimes. Often, it is difficult to prove that a national leader explicitly commanded his army to commit such crimes. 

To counter this problem, the ICC can also investigate the war crime of “waging aggressive war.” This means that rather than acting in self-defence, a war, conflict, or invasion was unjustified and aggressive: just for self benefit. This was the main focus of the Nuremberg trials after WW2.

And national leaders have been prosecuted for war crimes in the past. As I already mentioned, the political and military leaders of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were tried after WW2. 

More recently, tribunals have dealt with war crimes in Bosnia, Rwanda, and Cambodia amongst other countries. The former leader of Yugoslavia, Slobodan Milosevich was put on trial by a UN tribunal for his role in the terrible conflicts that occurred following the collapse of Yugoslavia. He died before a verdict was reached. Bosnian Serbs Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic were also investigated for war crimes by an international tribunal and are now serving life sentences. 

Other leaders have also been prosecuted. Former Liberian President Charles Taylor was sentenced to 50 years in prison for funding human rights abuses in neighbouring country Sierra Leone. And an African court sentenced the former dictator of Chad, Hissene Habre, to life in prison for crimes against humanity.

Final Thought

This episode of Thinking in English has tried to explain the concept of “war crimes.” I talked a little about the origins of the rules of law, talked about what countries can’t do in conflict, and also discussed how someone can be punished for committing “war crimes.”

I’m sure you are all expecting me to comment on whether Russia is committing war crimes and whether Putin is a war criminal. There have clearly been civilians killed in Ukraine, hospitals deliberately destroyed, evacuation convoys shot at, and Russia is suspected of using illegal weapons. But, I honestly think it is better to leave such investigations to the international courts, tribunals, and national criminal systems. 

The real issue will begin after the war. If Putin, or any other Russian, is charged with war crimes, how can you prosecute them? Where would the trial take place? Getting any Russian leader to a country that could arrest them would be almost impossible. Already, many of Russia’s richest oligarchs have left Europe and are trying to reach countries that will not join in with any criminal investigation. 

After listening to this episode, what do you think? Is Russia committing war crimes in Ukraine? Is Putin a “war criminal”? What should happen to Russia, and the leaders, if they are found guilty of war crimes?


Check out my recent podcast episodes!

https://anchor.fm/s/353d33c8/podcast/rss



Do you want to Think in English?

I’m so excited that you found my blog and podcast!! If you don’t want to miss an article or an episode, you can subscribe to my page!


Never miss an episode

Subscribe wherever you enjoy podcasts:

Scott Ritter, in the second and final part of this series, lays out what the law says about war crimes and how it applies to the conflict in Ukraine.

Biden’s speech in Warsaw. (Office of the President)

Read Part One: Russia, Ukraine and the Law of War: Crime of Aggression

By Scott Ritter
Special to Consortium News

During his recent four-day European tour, U.S. President Joe Biden made headlines when, during a meeting with Polish President Andrzej Duda, he described Russian President Vladimir Putin as “a man who I quite frankly think is a war criminal,” adding “I think it will meet the legal definition of that as well.”

Putin’s spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, condemned Biden’s comment as “unacceptable and unforgivable rhetoric on the part of the head of a state whose bombs have killed hundreds of thousands of people around the world.”

Biden made his remarks following a statement issued by Secretary of State Antony Blinken in which Blinken announced that the State Department had made a formal assessment that the Russian military had committed war crimes in Ukraine. “Based on information currently available,” Blinken said, “the U.S. government assesses that members of Russia’s forces have committed war crimes in Ukraine. “Our assessment,” Blinken added, “is based on a careful review of available information from public and intelligence sources.”

According to Blinken, “Russia’s forces have destroyed apartment buildings, schools, hospitals, critical infrastructure, civilian vehicles, shopping centers, and ambulances, leaving thousands of innocent civilians killed or wounded. Many of the sites Russia’s forces have hit have been clearly identifiable as in-use by civilians.” Blinken declared that this category “includes the Mariupol maternity hospital” as well as “a strike that hit a Mariupol theater, clearly marked with the Russian word for ‘children’ — in huge letters visible from the sky.”

Blinken’s accusations echo those made by the Ukrainian government and organizations such as Amnesty International. Karim Khan, the lead prosecutor for the International Criminal Court, has announced that his office will begin investigating allegations of Russian war crimes committed during its ongoing military operation in Ukraine.

The narrative that paints Russia and the Russian military as perpetrators of war crimes, however, runs afoul of actual international humanitarian law and the laws of war. The issue of jus in bello (the law governing conduct during the use of force) set forth a framework of legal concepts which, when allied to specific actions, help determine whether an actual violation of the law of war has occurred.

Jus in bello is derived from treaties, agreements, and customary international law. Two sets of international agreements, the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, and the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, serve as the foundation for the modern understanding of jus in bello, regulating, respectively, what is permissible in the execution of war, and the protections provided to non-combatants, including civilians and prisoners of war. “Grave breaches” of jus in bello can be prosecuted in courts of relevant jurisdiction as war crimes.

Starting from the proposition that war is little more than organized murder, the issue of how to define what constitutes murder sufficient to be categorized a being of a criminal nature is far more difficult that one might think. Michael Herr gave voice to this reality in his book, Dispatches, about America’s war in Vietnam, when he observed that, “Charging a man with murder in this place was like handing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500.”

Distinction, Intention, Necessity

Israeli air and artillery attacks against apartment building, Beirut 2006. (Hamed Talebi/Mehr News Agency/Wikimedia Commons)

One of the key considerations that distinguishes a legitimate act of war, and a war crime, is the notion of “military necessity.” According to the precepts set forth in the law of war, military necessity “permits measures which are actually necessary to accomplish a legitimate military purpose and are not otherwise prohibited by international humanitarian law. In the case of an armed conflict the only legitimate military purpose is to weaken the military capacity of the other parties to the conflict.”

Working hand in glove with the concept of military necessity is the issue of “humanity”, namely that a military operation cannot inflict suffering, injury, or destruction that is not necessary to accomplish a legitimate military objective. While “humanity” is difficult to define (is there ever a humane way to take a human life during war?), it does relate to another principle of international humanitarian law, “proportionality.”

Proportionality in wartime has yet to be strictly codified, but in basic terms it revolves around “the idea that military means should be proportionate to their anticipated ends.”

In short, if there is an enemy sniper in a room on the third floor of an apartment building, proportionality would be met if the force necessary to eliminate the sniper in the room in question was used; if there were any civilians in the room at the time, this would not constitute a violation of the laws of war, as the civilians would unfortunately (and tragically) fall under the notion of “collateral damage.”

If, however, force is applied that results in the destruction of the entire apartment complex, killing scores if not hundreds of civilians, then a case could be made that the use of force was disproportionate to the expected military result, and as such constitutes a war crime.

The final principle of note is that of “distinction”, which holds that parties to an armed conflict must “at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives.” Distinction prohibits “indiscriminate attacks and the use of indiscriminate means and methods of warfare,” such as carpet bombing, or an artillery bombardment which lacked a specific military purpose.

From these basic precepts and principles, the international community has codified specific acts that constitute war crimes in the form of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, in particular Article 8 (War Crimes). Here we find enumerated various actions which give rise to most, if not all, of the accusations made by Biden and Blinken when leveling their accusations of war crimes at Putin and the Russian military:

  • Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;
  • Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives;
  • Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units, or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict; and
  • Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects.

The Elements

Extreme example of lack of proportionality with intent: The bombing of Nagasaki as seen from the town of Koyagi, about 13 km south, taken 15 minutes after the bomb exploded. In the foreground, life seemingly went on unaffected. (Hiromichi Matsuda/Wikimedia Commons)

Each of the crimes listed above consist of two elements, each of which must be proved as a matter of law, before the accusation of a war crime can be cognizable. These are the physical element, or actus reaus, namely the act itself, and the mental element, or mens rea, which constitutes specific intent, or dolus specialis, to commit the act in question.

Even if you can prove the physical element of an alleged crime, such as the bombing of a hospital or apartment complex, unless one can prove the actual intent behind the attack (i.e., not just directing attacks against a civilian population, but rather intentionally directing these attacks), no crime has been committed.

One of the main mitigating circumstances against most alleged war crimes is the principle of “military necessity.” Take, for example, the act of bombing a hospital. If a bomb strikes a hospital, one has established de facto actus reas. Now, let’s say there exists a written order from a commander to a pilot ordering the pilot to bomb the hospital in question—dolus specialis has now been established, and a war crime has been committed.

Not so fast.

While the law of war prohibits direct attacks against civilian targets, such as housing, schools, and hospitals, as the International Committee of the Red Cross makes clear, “a hospital or school may become a legitimate military target if it contributes to specific military operations of the enemy and if its destruction offers a definite military advantage for the attacking side,” or if it is “being used as a base from which to launch an attack, as a weapons depot, or to hide healthy soldiers/fighters.”

Herein lies the rub. “Increasingly,” a recent article published in The Washinton Post noted, Ukrainians are confronting an uncomfortable truth: The military’s understandable impulse to defend against Russian attacks could be putting civilians in the crosshairs. Virtually every neighborhood in most cities has become militarized, some more than others, making them potential targets for Russian forces trying to take out Ukrainian defenses.”

Moreover, “Ukraine’s strategy of placing heavy military equipment and other fortifications in civilian zones could weaken Western and Ukrainian efforts to hold Russia legally culpable for possible war crimes.”

Who is Guilty?

The bottom line is that if Russia has intelligence that Ukraine is using an otherwise protected civilian target for military purposes, and if a decision is made to attack the target using force deemed proportional to the threat, then no war crime has been committed.

Indeed, given what The Washington Post has documented, it appears that it is Ukraine, not Russia, which is committing war crimes. According to Richard Weir, a researcher in Human Rights Watch’s crisis and conflict division quoted in the Post article, the Ukrainian military has “a responsibility under international law” to either remove their forces and equipment from civilian areas, or to move the civilian population from the areas where military personnel and equipment are being stored.

“If they don’t do that,” Weir said, “that is a violation of the laws of war. Because what they are doing is they are putting civilians at risk. Because all that military equipment are legitimate targets.”

The bottom line is that while the Ukrainian government, American politicians, and human rights groups can make allegations of war crimes by Russia in Ukraine, proving these allegations is a much more difficult task.

Moreover, it appears that, upon closer examination, the accuser (at least when it comes to the Ukrainian government) might become the accused should any thorough investigation of the alleged events occur.

If the Ukrainian government contends that specific sites struck by Russia fall into a protected category, and that by attacking them Russia has committed a war crime, then it must be assumed that any undertaking by Ukraine to place military personnel and equipment in the vicinity of these targets constitutes “an intentional co-location of military objectives and civilians or persons hors de combat with the specific intent of trying to prevent the targeting of those military objectives.”

That is the legal definition of a human shield, which is in and of itself a violation of the laws of war.

Scott Ritter is a former U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer who served in the former Soviet Union implementing arms control treaties, in the Persian Gulf during Operation Desert Storm and in Iraq overseeing the disarmament of WMD.

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

Post Views: 2,209

                              The definition of war crimes presented great difficulty for
every violation of the rules of warfare did not amount to a war crime. The
British military manual suggests that such refusal of quarter of, ill treatment
of prisoners of war, pillage and purposeless destruction are war crimes.  

 Definition — 

According to Oppenheim, war crimes are such hostile or other
acts of soldiers or other individuals as may be punished by the enemy on capture of
the offenders. They include acts contrary to international law perpetrated in
violation of the law of the criminals own state such as killing or plunder for
satisfying private lust and gain, as well as criminal acts, contrary to the
laws of war committed b order and on behalf of the enemy state. He classifies
war under four categories…

Classification of war crimes —

1) Violations of recognized rules regarding warfare
committed by members of the armed forces.

2) All hostilities in arms warfare committed by members of
the enemy armed committed by individuals who are not member of the enemy armed
forces.

3) Espionage and war treason.

4) Marauding acts.

The following acts as violation of the rules of warfare:

                                  *using of poison gas , killing wounded or surrendered soldiers,
disgraceful treatment of dead bodies on battle fields , treacherous request for
quarter, killing of hostages , ill-treatment of prisoners of war, killing or
attacking harmless private enemy individuals, wanton destruction of museum ,
hospitals, churches and schools, bombardment of undefended open towns or
historical monuments, attack on hospital ships, attack on bearers of flag of
truce etc.

Types of crimes  (In International
law )– 

There are three types of crime are as follows:

1) Crimes against peace  

2) War crimes

3) Crimes against Humanity

1) Crimes against peace – 

Such crimes included planning,
preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression , or a  war in violation of international treaties, agreements
or assurance,  of participation in common
plan  or conspiracy for the
accomplishment of any of the forgoing.

  

        2) War crimes –

             
War crimes covered violations of the laws or customs of war, including,
but not limited to , murder , ill-treatment, or deportation to slave labour or
any of purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory,, murder or
ill-treatment of prisoners of war, or person on seas, killing of hostages , plunder
of  public or private property , wanton
destruction of cities, towns, villages.

3)  Crimes against humanity –

                 Crimes against humanity included
murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhuman acts committed
under any civilian population before or during the war, or prosecution on
political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with
any crime within the jurisdiction of the tribunal, whether or not in violation
of the domestic laws of the country where perpetrated…      





What are war crimes?

Murder, rape, torture… the chaos of wartime often leads to impunity for the crimes committed by the parties at war. These crimes car be carried out against combatants as well as innocent civilians.

Not all violations committed during war are legally considered war crimes. To qualify, they must fulfil certain criteria of purpose and gravity, notably:

  • Existence of an armed conflict
  • Nexus between the conduct and the armed conflict (the crime was committed in pursuit of the conflict’s aim)
  • Serious violation of international humanitarian law
  • Criminal conduct engaging individual criminal responsibility

Unlike other human rights violations, war crimes do not engage State responsibility but individual criminal responsibility. This means that individuals can be tried and found personally responsible for these crimes.

Prohibited acts include:

  • Murder;
  • Torture or other cruel or inhuman treatment (including mutilation);
  • Taking hostages;
  • Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population;
  • Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historical monuments or hospitals;
  • Pillage
  • Rape and other forms of sexual violence
  • Conscription or enlisting children under the age of 15 years into armed forces or groups or using them to participate actively in hostilities.
  • Unlawful deportation transfer or confinement of protected persons.

Where and by whom can war crimes be prosecuted?

Domestic courts are usually responsible for prosecuting war crimes. It can, however, prove impossible during or in the aftermath of a conflict: the regime that perpetrated the crimes may still be in power, the conflict may have left the judicial infrastructure biased or inoperative, etc. Therefore, other institutions are also competent to prosecute war crimes: international, mixed and hybrid tribunals, and the International Criminal Court.

In accordance with the Geneva conventions, war crimes must also be prosecuted in countries other than those where the crimes were committed, on the basis of universal jurisdiction. It has been the case in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland, for example.

In spite of these developments, countless crimes remain unpunished, and many war criminals continue to benefit from – and operate with – complete impunity.

TRIAL International acts against war crimes

TRIAL represents victims to help them receive justice and fights against the impunity of perpetrators and their accomplices.

Representing victims

In the countries where it operates, TRIAL International documents war crimes and represents victims before national and international bodies, such as the United Nations Human Rights Committee and the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary executions.

Building cases against perpetrators

TRIAL International collects and analyses information from victims, victims associations, witnesses and other reliable sources to develop dossiers on suspected perpetrators of war crimes. It then submits this information to the competent authorities for further investigation and prosecution.

Over the years, the oganization has submitted dozens of cases to domestic authorities where suspected war criminals were residing or passing, urging them to exercise universal jurisdiction to prosecute these individuals. Over half of the cases filed have lead the authorities to open criminal investigations, and convictions have already been pronounced in certain cases. TRIAL International also files complaints against corporations for their participation to war crimes.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
  • Word for wanting to touch
  • Word for wanting to love
  • Word for wanting to eat but not hungry
  • Word for wanting to change something
  • Word for wanting to be successful