Non-inclusion generally refers to the act of excluding someone or something.
…
What’s another word for not included?
| exclusive | excluding |
|---|---|
| excepting | omitting |
| barring | leaving out |
| except for | leaving aside |
| not counting | excluding |
What is the opposite of included?
The opposite of the content is considered part of the whole. glued. glued. not included . omitted
What is not included?
Non-inclusion generally refers to the act of excluding someone or something. contexts. Treat a person or group as another in essence. Skip, not include, not mention.
What are two synonyms for the word exclude?
In other words, exclude
- bar .
- omit.
- preclude.
- prevent.
- prohibit.
- refuse.
- rule out.
- suspend.
What’s another word for included?
What’s another word for included?
| contained | combined |
|---|---|
| comprised | constituted |
| covered | enclosed |
| incorporated | embodied |
| encompassed | entered |
What is the opposite of violence?
Instead of getting involved in a physical conflict or being physically violent. Silence. Smooth. non-violent calm, calm.
Is disclosure the word?
Yes, this word is excluded. This word comes from the word dislude (verb to make a word), which was used in the past as an adjective (descriptive word). This means exclude, delete, exclude, etc. Example: excluded person.
What does it mean, but not limited to?
The phrase “but not limited to” suggests that other things, people, concepts, topics, organizations, or anything else may be included but not explicitly stated.
Includes but not limited to?
Example Sentences of “including but not limited to”
As we have seen, the phrase “including but not limited to” can be used to indicate that the things mentioned in a particular list are part of something larger, and that larger list may also include other things not mentioned in it. .
What is your name when you exclude someone?
Exclude comes from the Latin word exclure, which means to close. So when you shut someone out, you’re slamming the door in their face: keeping them out of the party, cutting them off the guest list, or refusing to include them in the conversation when they arrive.
What do we call ourselves when we self-exclude?
: the fact of excluding oneself from the activity…
The fact that the overall revenue
is
lower than the due charge payments reported in Table 8 might
because of penalties and non-compliance payments not being included in the calculation.
Тот факт, что общие поступления ниже, чем причитающиеся платежи, указанные в таблице 8, возможно, обусловлен тем,
что в расчеты не включаются пеня и платежи за несоблюдение требований.
In practical terms, this requirement at times results in
textual proposals made by indigenous peoples not being included in drafts, or put forward in ways that do
not
reflect their original proposals.
На практике это требование зачастую приводит к тому,
что предложения коренных народов не включают в текст проектов или их
включают
в отличающейся от первоначальной редакции.
The song»Blush»
was
excluded in the MTV. com
Песня Blush была исключена в MTV. com
полного потока альбома, а также не включена в iTunes издании.
The legal person may not be included in the statistics for a variety of reasons.
Юридическое лицо может не включаться в статистику по различным причинам.
A registered entrepreneur may not be included in the statistics for many reasons.
Зарегистрированный предприниматель может не включаться в статистику по многочисленным причинам.
Доказательство, признанное недопустимым, не подлежит включению в обвинительное заключение или обвинительный акт.
Хозяйственные операции, которые не были отражены в официальном бухгалтерском учете;
Меня не включат в списки на повышение в следующий раз.
Аксессуары( Могут не входить в комплектацию) Сборка люльки Смотрите рисунки 14- 17.
Non-cash prizes will not be included in the roll forward or rollback equation.
денежные призы не учитываются в методах» прокрутка вперед» и» откат».
Погружения ранним утром и ночные погружения не вкючены.
Она полагает, что преступления по международным договорам в нее не войдут.
Она считает, что разделы С и D в Статут включать не следует.
The day on which the limitation commences shall not be included in the period.
День, с которого начинает исчисляться исковая давность, в этот срок не включается.
Они придерживались мнения о том, что эту статью включать не следует.
Если данная графа
не
используется, этот лист не включается в заявление.
The day when the statute of limitations begins shall not be included in the time frame.
Quantities of psychotropic substances to
be
exported should not be included.
Количество психотропных веществ, предназначенных для экспорта, не указывается.
In the connections shown above, some cables may not be included with the projector.
На указанных выше подключениях некоторые кабели могут не входить в.
Expenditure related to the supply of drinking water should not be included.
Расходы, связанные с питьевым водоснабжением, включаться не должны.
Measures undertaken for cost-saving reasons(i.e. energy saving) should not be included.
Меры, предпринимаемые в целях экономии затрат( например, энергосбережения), включаться не должны.
Будет ли команда Sigma выпускать будущие обновления, которые не входят в активации Pack?
Действия,
не
отвечающие такому критерию, включать не следует.
Any taxes and or duties on your order will NOT be included in your online total.
Дополнительные налоги и/ или сборы не включены в ваш заказ.
Cash withdrawals will normally not be included as an Application because proof
was not
established
as to how the money
was
used.
Снятия наличных денежных средств, как правило, не включаются( равно как и заявление об открытии счета),
поскольку нет доказательств в отношении фактического использования денежных средств.
Consequently, permanent headquarters and offices would not be included in the definition, which
was
specifically clarified in paragraph 2 of the article.
Следовательно, в это определение не включаются постоянные штаб-квартиры и отделения, что четко оговаривается в пункте 2 статьи.
Results: 234,
Time: 0.1113
English
—
Russian
Russian
—
English
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Best Answer
Copy
ostracised
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
This answer is:
Study guides
Add your answer:
Earn +
20
pts
Q: What is another word for not being included?
Write your answer…
Submit
Still have questions?
Related questions
People also asked
Filters
Filter by Part of speech
verb
phrase
phrasal verb
Suggest
If you know synonyms for Not include, then you can share it or put your rating in listed similar words.
Suggest synonym
Menu
Not include Thesaurus
Not include Antonyms
Photo search results for Not include
Cite this Source
- APA
- MLA
- CMS
Synonyms for Not include. (2016). Retrieved 2023, April 14, from https://thesaurus.plus/synonyms/not_include
Synonyms for Not include. N.p., 2016. Web. 14 Apr. 2023. <https://thesaurus.plus/synonyms/not_include>.
Synonyms for Not include. 2016. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://thesaurus.plus/synonyms/not_include.
Since no one else has given a direct answer to the question that was asked, I’ll do it.
The answer is that with POSIX grep, it’s impossible to literally satisfy this request:
grep "<Regex for 'doesn't contain hede'>" input
The reason is that with no flags, POSIX grep is only required to work with Basic Regular Expressions (BREs), which are simply not powerful enough for accomplishing that task, because of lack of alternation in subexpressions. The only kind of alternation it supports involves providing multiple regular expressions separated by newlines, and that doesn’t cover all regular languages, e.g. there’s no finite collection of BREs that matches the same regular language as the extended regular expression (ERE) ^(ab|cd)*$.
However, GNU grep implements extensions that allow it. In particular, | is the alternation operator in GNU’s implementation of BREs. If your regular expression engine supports alternation, parentheses and the Kleene star, and is able to anchor to the beginning and end of the string, that’s all you need for this approach. Note however that negative sets [^ ... ] are very convenient in addition to those, because otherwise, you need to replace them with an expression of the form (a|b|c| ... ) that lists every character that is not in the set, which is extremely tedious and overly long, even more so if the whole character set is Unicode.
Thanks to formal language theory, we get to see how such an expression looks like. With GNU grep, the answer would be something like:
grep "^([^h]|h(h|eh|edh)*([^eh]|e[^dh]|ed[^eh]))*(|h(h|eh|edh)*(|e|ed))$" input
(found with Grail and some further optimizations made by hand).
You can also use a tool that implements EREs, like egrep, to get rid of the backslashes, or equivalently, pass the -E flag to POSIX grep (although I was under the impression that the question required avoiding any flags to grep whatsoever):
egrep "^([^h]|h(h|eh|edh)*([^eh]|e[^dh]|ed[^eh]))*(|h(h|eh|edh)*(|e|ed))$" input
Here’s a script to test it (note it generates a file testinput.txt in the current directory). Several of the expressions presented in other answers fail this test.
#!/bin/bash
REGEX="^([^h]|h(h|eh|edh)*([^eh]|e[^dh]|ed[^eh]))*(|h(h|eh|edh)*(|e|ed))$"
# First four lines as in OP's testcase.
cat > testinput.txt <<EOF
hoho
hihi
haha
hede
h
he
ah
head
ahead
ahed
aheda
ahede
hhede
hehede
hedhede
hehehehehehedehehe
hedecidedthat
EOF
diff -s -u <(grep -v hede testinput.txt) <(grep "$REGEX" testinput.txt)
In my system it prints:
Files /dev/fd/63 and /dev/fd/62 are identical
as expected.
For those interested in the details, the technique employed is to convert the regular expression that matches the word into a finite automaton, then invert the automaton by changing every acceptance state to non-acceptance and vice versa, and then converting the resulting FA back to a regular expression.
As everyone has noted, if your regular expression engine supports negative lookahead, the regular expression is much simpler. For example, with GNU grep:
grep -P '^((?!hede).)*$' input
However, this approach has the disadvantage that it requires a backtracking regular expression engine. This makes it unsuitable in installations that are using secure regular expression engines like RE2, which is one reason to prefer the generated approach in some circumstances.
Using Kendall Hopkins’ excellent FormalTheory library, written in PHP, which provides a functionality similar to Grail, and a simplifier written by myself, I’ve been able to write an online generator of negative regular expressions given an input phrase (only alphanumeric and space characters currently supported, and the length is limited): http://www.formauri.es/personal/pgimeno/misc/non-match-regex/
For hede it outputs:
^([^h]|h(h|e(h|dh))*([^eh]|e([^dh]|d[^eh])))*(h(h|e(h|dh))*(ed?)?)?$
which is equivalent to the above.
The English language is full of important phrases we use and see every day. “Include but not limited to” is one of these phrases. But how do you use this phrase? What does it mean and is there any punctuation for it?
What Does “Include but not limited to” Mean?
When you read the phrase, “include but not limited to,” it’s usually followed by a list of items most often associated with an idea. The caveat with the wording means it can go beyond what’s listed. Although the list mentions specific objects or ideas, the list isn’t bound to only what’s there.
How Do You Use the Phrase?
Often, it’s used in legal documentation and is specific to contracts. Even though the word “include” and the phrase, “not limited to” may seem as though they mean the same thing, they don’t. The qualifying phrase allows for unforeseen items without actually stating them in detail.
Examples of Use
For instance, if you are reading instructions for an all-around multipurpose cleaner, you might read something like: “For use on surfaces that include but not limited to wood, glass, marble, porcelain, stainless steel and etc.”
There will be times when using this phrase that may have a succession of verbs needing agreement. If you were talking about a friend’s many hobbies, you might say, “Her hobbies include but are not limited to – dancing, biking, running, hiking, playing tennis, golfing, swimming and practicing yoga.”
The Verb “to Be”
You will notice the injection of “are” between “but” and “not” to indicate conjugation of the verb “to be.” You always want to ensure your sentence agreement is obvious by making the verb reflect the action of a subject onto an object. In the example above, “her hobbies” is the subject, “are not limited to” is the verb and the subsequent list of hobbies is the object.
How Do You Punctuate the Phrase?
There isn’t any particular punctuation needed when writing “include but not limited to” as long as the list is short. You merely have to put commas in after each item on the list (as given in the examples above) and place the word “and” before the last item.
But, if you have a list that’s longer than five or six items, you want to use a colon (:) or dash (–). Ideally, the dash is for items less than 15 in number but more than five. For 15 items or more, you’d use the colon and then list each item. You can sometimes list each item on a separate line.
Using Language to Convey Meaning
Proper use and command of language allows for better projection of ideas and innermost thoughts. The phrase, “include but not limited to” can apply to daily life and legal documents that will expand your capacity to communicate. You can list concepts in a succinct way so a reader understands the list and knows it can go beyond it.
- Author
- Recent Posts
Conor is the main writer here at One Minute English and was an English teacher for 10 years. He is interested in helping people with their English skills and learning about using A.I tools at work.
I need a word with this definition:
«Something said or written that is so implied or self-evident that making the statement is completely unnecessary.»
The closest word I can come up with is truism.
Matt E. Эллен
28.9k15 gold badges104 silver badges168 bronze badges
asked Jul 18, 2016 at 7:25
Michael RaderMichael Rader
1,2382 gold badges11 silver badges22 bronze badges
3
You should check implicit:
understood though not clearly or directly stated
Common synonyms I saw in use are tacit and unspoken. They are listed along with the definition.
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 8:44
alwayslearningalwayslearning
27.5k6 gold badges44 silver badges99 bronze badges
1
Two words: ‘a given’. Otherwise, ‘self-evident’ or ‘obvious’.
For a younger audience: ‘Duh’.
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 9:49
2
You may be looking for the word «superfluous». From Merriam Webster
1
a : exceeding what is sufficient or necessary : extra
b : not needed : unnecessary
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 13:15
Hugh MeyersHugh Meyers
1,2327 silver badges12 bronze badges
I would suggest redundant.
As shown below, the definitions in both British & American English refer to using superfluous words.
redundant (Cambridge Dictionary)
adjectiveBritish English:
not needed
(especially of a word, phrase, etc.) unnecessary because it is more than is needed:
Example:
In the sentence «She is a single unmarried woman», the word «unmarried» is redundant.American English:
more than what is usual or necessary, esp. using extra words that mean the same thing:
Example:
My English teacher was merciless if what we wrote was abstract, sentimental, or redundant.
Although the example sentences above primarily relate to using more words that necessary, the simple definition of redundant is not needed. It can therefore equally be used to refer to an entire sentence or statement; for example:
That statement is redundant.
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 10:07
TrevorDTrevorD
12.1k2 gold badges32 silver badges61 bronze badges
7
truism
as stated in Wikipedia.
obvious and implicit are adjectives describing this.
tautology is sometimes wrongly used to describe this, as it means a statement that is true due to its form (a statement which is true independent from its interpretation).
redundant sounds quite technical, usually referring to the non-informative content of an information.
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 13:59
rexkogitansrexkogitans
3562 silver badges11 bronze badges
axiomatic
obviously true
taken for granted : self-evident
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 14:54
shawnt00shawnt00
2192 silver badges10 bronze badges
5
«Something said or written that is so implied or self-evident that making the statement is completely unnecessary» that would be an obvious statement.
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 12:53
AlexAlex
2972 silver badges7 bronze badges
I would suggest «tautology,» although I admit it has some of the same problems as «redundant.» Both have connotations of repetition that are missing in the poster’s definition. «Superfluous» might be better, but its domain is not limited primarily to speech.
Another answer dismissed «tautology» as a possible answer to this question by arguing that the word’s common meaning of redundancy is actually incorrect, and that the only correct definition of «tautology» is its technical definition in formal logic («a statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form,» to quote from the New Oxford American Dictionary — a statement that by virtue of its logical structure is true in every possible state description within a given logical theory, e.g. «p or not p» in a binary logical system in which all statements are either true or false). But the more common definitions of «tautology» are listed alongside the formal logical definition of tautology in most dictionaries. To use «tautology» to mean a redundant phrase is only incorrect when a listener or writer would reasonably expect the word’s technical definition to be employed. Many technical terms have vastly different lay meanings, but this generally does not make the lay meanings incorrect.
answered Jul 19, 2016 at 5:00
N. PostN. Post
6813 silver badges10 bronze badges
In the technical discussions, we say:
«That’s implied.»
adjective: implied
suggested but not directly expressed; implicit.
‘stating the obvious
or something that does not need to be explicitly stated.’
answered Jul 19, 2016 at 5:42
A Latin loan phrase adopted in English usage:
sine qua non
Sine qua non (/ˌsaɪni kweɪ ˈnɒn/; Latin: [ˈsine kwaː ˈnoːn])1 or
condicio sine qua non (plural: condiciones sine quibus non) is an
indispensable and essential action, condition, or ingredient. It was
originally a Latin legal term for «[a condition] without which it
could not be», or «but for…» or «without which [there is] nothing».As a Latin term, it occurs in the work of Boethius, and originated in
Aristotelian expressions.1 In recent times, it has passed from a
merely legal usage to a more general usage in many languages,
including English, German, French, Italian, Spanish, etc.—WP
answered Jul 19, 2016 at 6:49
agcagc
2,7531 gold badge13 silver badges28 bronze badges
2
Does Common knowledge satisfy the idea? I.e., «knowledge that is known by everyone or nearly everyone, usually with reference to the community in which the term is used.»
Def. from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_knowledge
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 19:25
1
understatement fits the bill. For example:
Your car rolls off cliff into ocean…
Your friend: «At least you’ll save on the car wash.»
You: «That’s an understatement.»
answered Jul 18, 2016 at 22:51
There is a distinct difference between the formal and informal style in any language, and English is no different. It is quite common to find that specific phrases only apply in particular situations, while other expressions and phrases are mostly used only in a formal context, like in contracts or business.
“Including but not limited to” means that the terms listed are not limited to the explicit ideas expressed in the statement. It is a phrase most often used in legal documents or binding contracts. Comma placement in the phrase is most common before the “but” and after the “to”.
If you are drafting a legal or formal document, using the correct phrases and wording is of the utmost importance to get the proper point across and avoid loopholes. This article will explore the origin and use of the expression, “including but not limited to,” what it means, the punctuation that goes along with it, and how to correctly apply it.
If you use the phrase “including but not limited to” for a very short list of things, punctuating the actual phrase isn’t a grammatical necessity.
However, if you use it along with a very long or complex list, you can use commas so the reader can better understand what you mean.
The word “including” is a gerund, which means it is a verbal ending in -ing. A verbal is a word based on a verb and, therefore, it is used to indicate an action or state of being.
Although gerunds often need little to no punctuation, it is common to place a comma before a gerund like “including” (source).
Some example sentences using a comma before the gerund “including”:
I have many hobbies, including, but not limited to, horse riding, fencing, cricket, and painting.
My mom adores great artists, including, but not limited to, Van Gogh, Monet, and Dali.
Comma Use and the Oxford Comma
Writers often use the Oxford comma, also known as the serial comma, in English with long and complex sentences, such as lists for items, which often occurs with the phrase “including but not limited to.”
The Oxford comma’s purpose is to indicate whether the two last things mentioned in a list are two separate things or whether they are examples of the previous thing.
| Punctuation | Sentence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| No Oxford Comma | I love my parents, Rihanna and Sherlock Holmes. | This means that the speaker loves their parents and that their parents are Rihanna and Sherlock Holmes. |
| With Oxford Comma | I love my parents, Rihanna, and Garfield. | This is a list of people that includes parents, Rihanna, and Garfield, and the speaker loves all of them. |
If you were speaking, you would not be able to see the punctuation used and would have to use the context of the sentence to deduce its meaning.
However, when writing, although the oxford comma is optional, it easily clarifies the meaning of a sentence and makes it easier to read (source).
When you’re using the phrase “including but not limited to,” you would most likely list a large number of items, so the Oxford comma or serial comma would help with the readability of the sentence as a whole.
“Including but not limited to” Comma Placement
We can use commas in various ways to clarify the meaning and ease the readability of your sentence using “including but not limited to.”
The first is to omit the use of commas entirely. This has the potential to make your sentence seem clumsy and untidy if it includes an extensive list, but it is not wrong. Consider the following example:
The camp activities include but are not limited to team building, archery, and fishing.
As you can see from the above example, the only commas in use are in the actual list, but that’s because the list is short, and the meaning is still clear.
However, many people may find this writing style clumsy, as it seems like a really long sentence that does not offer the reader any breaks.
Therefore, the better way to write a sentence using the phrase “including but not limited to” would be to place commas after the “including” and after the “to,” as in this example:
The camp activities include, but are not limited to, team building, archery, and fishing.
This writing style offers the reader two breaks in a very long sentence and, as a bonus, looks neat and tidy.
When using commas to break up a sentence, the important thing to remember is that the first and last parts should still make sense even if you take the bit between the commas away.
The camp activities include team building, archery, and fishing.
As you can see, the sentence has retained its meaning but is now vaguer, and the possibility of other activities isn’t as obvious.
That is why we use the full phrase “including but not limited to” — the “but not limited to” implies there is more to the list than what is mentioned outright.
If you were to use the Oxford comma, it wouldn’t change the sentence’s meaning at all and would still be correct (source).
The camp activities include team building, archery, and fishing.
The camp activities include, but are not limited to, team building, archery, and fishing.
Using “Including but not Limited To” in a Sentence
As with any English phrase, “including but not limited to” needs to have properly conjugated verbs depending on the context.
For this phrase specifically, you would conjugate only the word “including,” but remember that the rest of the sentence needs to be in line with the proper conjugations related to the subject and the noun.
Because “including but not limited to” is often used with the word “is,” you will need to conjugate the “is” as well. Let’s look at how we conjugate verbs for “including but not limited to” for a singular or plural subject.
| Singular | Plural | |
|---|---|---|
| Example | The English alphabet includes but is not limited to the letters A, B, and C. | School activities include but are not limited to hockey, netball, and basketball. |
| Explanation | “Alphabet” is singular, so you use “includes” and “is.” | “Activities” is plural, so you use “include” and “are.” |
Examples Using “Including but not Limited To”
As we’ve discussed, the phrase “including but not limited to” can be used to indicate that the things named in a certain list are part of something larger, and the larger thing may also include other items not mentioned.
Although it is a legal term, we can also use the phrase in everyday speech, especially if you’re concerned there is something you just couldn’t think of at that moment but that you wouldn’t want to exclude. Below are some sentence examples.
My reading list includes, but is not limited to, Harry Potter, The Da Vinci Code, and Atonement.
The company will also pay usual and normal administrative expenses, including, but not limited to, hotel stays, shuttles, and food.
Organizations, including, but not limited to, businesses, unions, charities, and corporations, aren’t citizens and, therefore, cannot vote.
Our itinerary includes but is not limited to a zoo visit, a museum visit, and lunch at the deli.
I enjoy takeaways, including, but not limited to, KFC, Pizza Hut, and McDonald’s.
Origin and Applications of “Including but not Limited To”
The phrase “including but not limited to” originated in the legal field and has since migrated to other official contexts where specific wording is necessary to cover any potential loopholes.
Although writers mostly use this phrase in a legal or contractual context, it can also be applied in everyday informal speech, although this isn’t a widespread occurrence.
Legal Use
When writing legal documents, exceptional care needs to be paid to word use, as ambiguous meanings or interpretations can have catastrophic or costly impacts.
This is why seemingly redundant phrases such as “including but not limited to” are developed specifically for contractual use.
Even though the words “including” and “not limited to” are similar in meaning, it is important in a legal context to use both as it limits the possibility of ambiguity.
This means that using “including” by itself can lead to the understanding that only what someone specifically stated or laid out is included.
If you use both “including” and “not limited to,” this opens up the possibility that the person drafting the document implies the inclusion of a large range of items without the need to list every single one of them.
For example, you could say that the alphabet includes the letters A, B, and C. You will notice that, although the other letters have been left out, the possibility remains that they are also included.
Still, the possibility also exists that the drafter deliberately left out the other letters so as to exclude them.
If you were to say that the alphabet includes but is not limited to the letters A, B, and C, you ensure that the others are included as well by default.
Although this is a commonly used phrase in legal jargon, certain judges may still consider it vague if someone were to challenge it.
That means that, should a proper case be made for it, a judge may rule in favor of the opposing party if they said that “including but not limited to” was too vague as it did not specifically note down each of the items to be included (source).
Everyday Use
Although the expression “including but not limited to” is generally used for formal speech, contracts, or in a legal context, you can also informally use the phrase outside of the context of binding contracts or legal documents.
It isn’t very common for English speakers to use this phrase in their everyday language, but using it does not sound awkward.
In an everyday context, the phrase simply means you are implying the set of items or things you list is part of a larger group of things you are not listing specifically.
For example, you could say, “Our day will include but is not limited to a zoo visit, lunch at the local deli, and a tour of the museum.” If used in this context, you are saying that you may do other things during the day, although you do not specifically state them.
This merely means that, although there are things you include in the list, you may not have thought of everything yet but don’t want to rule out other possibilities (source).
Although the words “including” and “not limited to” are similar, though not identical, in meaning, adding “not limited to” expands on “including” to broaden the scope of things covered.
Often words with similar meanings are confused by second-language learners, but that does not mean that it is impossible to learn. Another example is “make do” or “make due,” although both mean the same, only one is generally used.
Final Thoughts
The appropriate way to use the phrase “including but not limited to” is when you list several things as examples of a larger group. The group may be so large that you cannot name all of the items, or you may simply be unable to think of the rest of the list at that moment.
Writers generally use “including but not limited to” in a legal context and often used in contracts or binding agreements when merely using “including” alone could lead to a costly loophole.
Using the entire phrase implies that there is more to the list than meets the eye and that it encompasses aspects that you did not state outright. We can also use it in everyday speech, but this is far less common.