‘HAVING LEFT A WILL’ is a 15 letter
Phrase
starting with H and ending with L
Crossword answers for HAVING LEFT A WILL
Clue | Answer |
---|---|
|
|
HAVING LEFT A WILL (7) |
TESTATE |
Synonyms for TESTATE
5 letter words
6 letter words
Top answer for HAVING LEFT A WILL crossword clue from newspapers
Thanks for visiting The Crossword Solver «Having left a will».
We’ve listed any clues from our database that match your search for «Having left a will». There will also be a
list of synonyms for your answer.
The answers have been arranged depending on the number of characters so that they’re easy to
find.
If a particular answer is generating a lot of interest on the site today, it may be highlighted in
orange.
If your word «Having left a will» has any anagrams, you can find them with our anagram solver or at this
site.
We hope that you find the site useful.
Regards, The Crossword Solver Team
More clues you might be interested in
- bring to bear
- elevation
- timid
- first place
- an unsophisticated person from the country
- seat by a forest trail
- stupendously
- cereal; whisky
- shiny coating
- n
- west of tinseltown
- coffee holder
- boxer
- cause to be alone
- alarmed
- controller
- fixed idea
- thumb a lift
- mixture
- violoncello
- egret relative
- bit of color
- musical term
- cracks
- in excited eagerness
- light purple colour
- step
- electronic messages
- free from dirt
- furniture
Crossword Clue Last Updated: 21/08/2022
Below are possible answers for the crossword clue Having left a will.
7 letter answer(s) to having left a will
TESTATE
- a person who makes a will
- having made a legally valid will before death
Other crossword clues with similar answers to ‘Having left a will’
25’s old man in check on French city
Commoners
Exam put away with instructions on passing
Having a will
Having left a valid will
Having the will?
Having written a valid will
How some people die
Not unwilling?
One way to die
One with plans for passing Tesla motorcar, say
Ready to go, you might sa
Willing to examine a note
Willing to examine mischievous goddess
With a legally valid will
Still struggling to solve the crossword clue ‘Having left a will’?
If you’re still haven’t solved the crossword clue Having left a will then why not search our database by the letters you have already!
Submit a new word or definition
Number of letters
Enter which letters you already have
Start Over
Subjects>Hobbies>Toys & Games
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Best Answer
Copy
Bequest, testate
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
This answer is:
Study guides
Add your answer:
Earn +
20
pts
Q: Seven letter word for having left a will?
Write your answer…
Submit
Still have questions?
Related questions
People also asked
It’s easy to get tense when trying to figure out English tenses, considering we have so many of them! Also, figuring out when and how to use each one can get confusing. For example, is it okay to say “have left”?
We can say “have left” in the correct context, such as in the present perfect tense or future perfect tense where “have” is the helping verb and “left” is the past participle of “leave.” Sometimes, we use “have left” to refer to how much of something remains. Another less common use is when we use “have” as the main verb and “left” refers to direction.
This article will look at what “have left” means and how its different usages can impact meaning. We will also explore auxiliary or helping verbs and learn more about the perfect tenses. Finally, we will look at tips on how to use them correctly and avoid mistakes.
Is it Correct to Say Have Left?
“Have left” is correct when you use it correctly. Most often, “have” is the helping or auxiliary verb we use with the main verb “left,” the past participle of the verb “leave.”
We can use “have left” in the present perfect tense or “will have left” in the future perfect tense. In some scenarios, “have” is the main verb followed by the adjective “left,” as in the phrase, “intersections have left-turn signals.” This is also correct.
What Does “Have Left” Mean?
“Have left” can mean different things when we use it in other contexts as well as with the various tenses. For example, the verb “left” can mean “to go away from a place or person,” or it can refer to “what is remaining” as an adjective. Thus, “have left” can also mean something different in each case.
Consider some of the following examples.
- The Johnsons have left for dinner already.
Here, the clause uses “left” with the meaning “going away from one place to another” — in this case, where the Johnsons have gone for dinner.
- The Johnsons will have left their home by eight o’clock.
In this sentence, “have left” again refers to “going away,” and the addition of “will” before “have” makes it the future perfect tense to indicate that it is in the future. It is further specified by a time, “eight o’clock.”
- The Johnsons have left their home to charity.
This example uses “have left” in the sense of “bequeathing” or “transferring something for somebody” and indicates that the Johnsons donated their home to a charity.
- The recent winds have left the Johnsons’ gardens in a mess.
The above sentence uses “have left” in the sense of the verb “leave” to mean “cause [someone or something] to be in a particular state or position.” In this case, the rains have caused the gardens to be in a bad state.
- This is all the Johnsons have left with them.
In the above example, the word “left” means “what is remaining” with the Johnsons at this statement’s point of time. Thus, here it works as an adjective with “have” becoming the main verb (source).
Note that while Merriam-Webster does not list this specific meaning of the word “left” as an adjective, it does define “leftover” as an adjective with the meaning “something unused or unconsumed” (source).
In other words, “leftover” means something that is remaining, similar to the verbal phrase “be left over,” which means “to remain when all that is needed is used up” (source). For example, “There was lots of food left over after the party” versus “There was a lot of leftover food from the party.”
We could also say, “There was lots of food left after the party,” using “left” as a verbal adjective. We form many adjectives in English from past or present participles, and participles are verbals that function as adjectives, so we might argue that left could be a verb or an adjective here (source).
In the final example, though, “left” is definitely an adjective.
- All the intersections leading to the Johnsons home have left–turn signals.
Here, “have” is the main verb indicating possession, and the adjective “left” describes the direct object “turn signals.”
“Have” vs. “Had” vs. “Has” vs. “Will Have” Left
Let us look at when it is correct to use each of these different forms of the helping verb “have” with “left.”
For example, is it correct to say the following sentence?
- I have left my eyeglasses at home, so I couldn’t read the menu.
Since “have left” is the present perfect tense, we cannot use it with “couldn’t” in the second part of the sentence, which indicates the past tense.
The correct form of “have left” in this case is its past perfect form, as in:
- I had left my eyeglasses at home, so I couldn’t read the menu.
Or we can simply leave out the helping verb here and say:
- I left my eyeglasses at home, so I couldn’t read the menu.
However, using “had left” indicates that the event happened in the past, while not using the helping verb “have/had” and simply saying “left” refers to something happening more recently.
The below table shows us the different ways we use “have” with the main verb “left” to indicate different perfect tenses. Note that the future perfect tense also requires the use of “will” or “shall” along with “have.”
First Person Singular | Second Person Singular | Third Person Singular | Plural | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Present Perfect | I have left | You have left | She has left | We/they have left |
Past Perfect | I had left | You had left | She had left | We/they had left |
Future Perfect | I will have left | You will have left | She will have left | We/they will have left |
For more on using verb forms of “have” with main verbs, check out “When Do We Use ‘Has Left’ or ‘Had Left’?”
Auxiliary Verbs: How They Help
Auxiliary verbs function before main verbs and help form the various tenses, moods, and voices of the main verbs. Grammarians also call them “helping verbs” as they help the main verb by adding grammatical or functional meaning to the phrase or sentence.
The principal helping verbs are “be,” “do,” and “have.” Other examples include modal auxiliary verbs like “can,” “may,” “shall,” or “will,” and they help express necessity, possibility, intention, or ability (source).
More About “Be,” “Do,” and “Have”
We can use “be,” “do,” and “have” as main verbs and auxiliary or helping verbs. For example, we used “have” as a helping verb with the main verb “left” in the previous section. Let us look at the three principal helping verbs and how we use them.
Helping Verbs and Their Forms
We use “be” to express the continuous tense and form the passive voice. We use “do” to form negative and interrogative sentences with other verbs and provide emphasis. Meanwhile, we use “have” to create the perfect tenses.
Each of these verbs takes on different forms depending on where we use them. See below for the same:
- Be: am, are, be, been, being, is, was, were
- Do: Did, does, do
- Have: Had, has, having, have
How Helping Verbs Help to Denote Tense, Mood, and Voice
For tense, different forms of the helping verbs help the reader figure out the time of the subject’s action. For example:
- I am reading. (present)
- We were reading. (past)
- She had read the book. (past perfect)
- They have been reading their books. (present perfect continuous)
- He will have read the book by tomorrow. (future perfect)
We will discuss more regarding the perfect tenses in the next section.
Auxiliary verbs also help us express the mood of a sentence. For example:
- She doesn’t like chocolates. (to form a negative sentence)
- Are you coming? (to question)
- John wishes he were going to the concert. (to indicate a wish)
- I do like this book. (for emphasis)
Helping verbs help change the voice of a sentence. For example:
- He read the book. (active voice)
- The book was read by him. (passive voice)
For more on the different types of verbs, including helping verbs, you may want to check out “Has Been or Had Been: How to Use the Perfect Tense.”
The Perfect Tenses: An Overview
We have three main tenses in English: the past, present, and future tense. In addition, each of these has four categories — simple, perfect, continuous, and perfect continuous (also called perfect progressive) — giving us 12 tenses. We are going to look at the perfect tenses below.
We use the perfect tenses of verbs to indicate actions or events that are completed (or perfected) at any specific referred time.
The Present Perfect Tenses
The present perfect tense expresses the completion of an action in the recent past. It also indicates how much or how many of the action(s) have been completed. The impact is from the action being completed (source).
We also use it for past events that occurred at an unspecified time and to express cumulative past history.
Formula: “has” or “have” + past participle of the main verb
- I have left some dinner for you in the kitchen.
- John has gone to the library.
- Sue has visited Disneyland twice.
- Have you ever eaten sushi?
The present perfect continuous tense indicates ongoing events that started in the past and continue right up to the present or have very recently finished. Thus, the impact is from the action itself and not status. In addition, we can use it to indicate temporary actions as well as ongoing single or repeated actions.
Formula: “has” or “have” + “been” + main verb + “ing”
- You have been writing all day.
- I have been cooking all day; that’s why the kitchen is a mess.
- We have been eating out a lot recently.
- He has been running the Boston marathon for a decade.
Note that we use the present perfect and not its continuous form with verbs that state a fact rather than an action (know, agree, forget). We call these stative verbs.
- We have known him since he was a child. (correct)
- We have been knowing him since he was a child. (incorrect)
The Past Perfect Tenses
The past perfect tense talks about actions or events that happened before another action or event or a particular point of time in the past. We use it to focus on the result of the actions. In addition, we use the past perfect instead of its continuous form with stative verbs.
Formula: “had” + past participle of the main verb
- She had left when we arrived.
- They had known each other for about five years before they got married.
The past perfect continuous tense talks about actions or events that began in the past and continued for some time before another action or event in the past. We use it to focus on the duration of the action.
Formula: “had” + “been” + main verb + “ing”
- John had been playing the flute for 10 years before he got to play a solo.
- He failed the test as he had not been attending classes.
To read more about the past and present perfect tenses, check out our article, “Has Been or Had Been: How to Use the Perfect Tense.”
The Perfect Future Tenses
We use the future perfect tense to indicate actions or events that will have happened by a certain time in the future or before other future events. Like with the other perfect tenses, this focuses on the results of the action, and we use it with stative verbs.
Formula: “will have” + past participle of the main verb
- She will have written the letter to her mom by this time tomorrow.
- The contractors will have finished building the house by the time the furniture arrives.
The future perfect continuous tense indicates an action that continues for some time before ending or up to a certain future point of time (source). It focuses on the duration of the action, as with the other tenses. This article was written for strategiesforparents.com.
Formula: “will have been” + main verb + “ing”
- When my parents arrive, I will have been studying for five hours.
- They would have been traveling for five weeks straight by the end of this month.
Final Thoughts
We can use the phrase “have left” correctly in a few different ways. These include the present perfect tenses and the future perfect tenses.
In very specific scenarios, like referring to direction, we use “have” as a main verb with the word “left,” which most often functions as an adjective. Sometimes, we can use “left” as a verbal adjective meaning “remaining.”
Remember that all three of the perfect tenses have one thing in common: they use the past participle of the main verb with the auxiliary verb “have” in any one of its forms (“have,” “has,” or “had”). Thus, once you get the hang of the perfect tenses, you can write perfectly whether you refer to the past, present, or future.
HSS
Senior Member
-
#1
Hi.
Jason is telling his daughter, Sarah, to call and stop her boy friend in New York from coming.
Jason: Well, go call him back.
Sarah: I wish I could.
Jason: You can.
Sarah: He already will have left by now.
What is the subtlety of «He already will have left by now»? What is the difference between «He already has left by now» and «He already will have left by now»?
Come to think of it, shouldn’t it be «He has already left by now» or «He will have already left by now»?
(See the orders?)
Hiro
-
#2
Hi,
I agree with the order, but since it is spoken, that’s how people talk.
The difference is:
He has already left.
You know for sure he is no longer there.
He will have already left by now. (I’m not sure I would say already and by now, sounds kind of redundant).
You suppose he is no longer there (because you knew at what time he had to leave), but you are not absolutely sure.
-
#3
Yes, the modal verb will can be used to signal probability or inference.
They are there now. (fact) / They will be there now. (I suppose)
They have arrived now. (fact) / They will have arrived now. (I suppose)
And arguably, at least for some speakers:
They arrive tomorrow. (fact — their schedule states that they arrive tomorrow) / They will arrive tomorrow. (prediction, and all predictions are tinged with just a bit of uncertainty because we never know the future for sure)
HSS
Senior Member
-
#4
Having read your explanations, I presume sentence [1] has connotation [2]. Am I good in interpretation?
[1] He will have left two weeks ago.
[2] You will know he left two weeks ago.
Does this syntax only give you suppostion? Couldn’t it be more than just that — maybe, probability?
What is the nuance of the construct vis-a-vis that with «must»? I assume [3] is stronger than [1], but that [1] is stronger than «I suppose he left two weeks ago» in terms of certainty.
[3] He must have left two weeks ago.
Hiro
-
#5
Having read your explanations, I presume sentence [1] has connotation [2]. Am I good in interpretation?
[1] He will have left two weeks ago.
[2] You will know he left two weeks ago.Does this syntax only give you suppostion? Couldn’t it be more than just that — maybe, probability?
What is the nuance of the construct vis-a-vis that with «must»? I assume [3] is stronger than [1], but that [1] is stronger than «I suppose he left two weeks ago» in terms of certainty.
[3] He must have left two weeks ago.
Hiro
They can be the same, like if a doorbell rings..
«It’ll be Joe at the door»
«Oh that must be Joe at the door»
It just shows you think it’s probable, and you are confident about it.
With [3] as it’s referring to the past, it’s more probably that it’s true, because you might have been able to deduce that this is what happened, but when using it in the present tense, referring to the future, it’s just like the future tense.
HSS
Senior Member
-
#6
Thanks. Very informative.
What about
[1] He will have left two weeks ago.
[2] You will know he left two weeks ago.
?
Is [2] tantamount to [1], more or less? You won’t be sure until later, but you will know he left two weeks ago now. Hence, it’s the same as «He must have left two weeks ago.» «Will» has this connotation, doesn’t it?
Hiro
Cagey
post mod (English Only / Latin)
-
#7
No, I don’t think [2] is tantamount to [1]. There is a difference between «will» as a prediction about the future (you will know) and «will» as a supposition, as Teddy explains.
The two may be related, but you can’t substitute one for the other and get the same meaning, which is what you seem to be trying to do in the above post. [2] is a prediction about the future and has a certainty that is not present in [1].
Or did I misunderstand you?
HSS
Senior Member
-
#8
Or did I misunderstand you?
I suppose no, Cagey. I was trying to see any rationale leading to the nuance the «will» has. Doesn’t that, then, have any futurity?
Hiro
Cagey
post mod (English Only / Latin)
-
#9
I suppose no, Cagey. I was trying to see any rationale leading to the nuance the «will» has. Doesn’t that, then, have any futurity?
Hiro
No, it doesn’t. In fact, historically, the relationship is closer to the reverse. «Will» meaning «to wish to» came first, and its use as an auxiliary verb in constructing a future tense came second. Now the second use is the more common one, and the one people are likely to think of.
HSS
Senior Member
-
#10
Wow, very interesting.
Now, I suppose this usage of «will» most likely should be seen with a time adverbial so you wouldn’t confuse it with the future perfect. Shouldn’t it?
[1] Mel will be playing basketball with his friends now at the park.
[2] Jacob will have arrived at the Amtrack station by now.
[3] Stan will have been singing for two straight hours now. (But not just only for two straight hours. It can be interpreted as a future event without enough context)
[4] It will be raining for months on end now on the island.(But not just only for months on end. It can be interpreted as a future event without enough context)
[5] Santa will have left his home by a week ago.
[6] Chrisy will have been so depressed and cooped up in her home by a week ago, but she has been back to normal again thanks to the medication.
What about more complicated ones like the following? Do they make sense at all?
[7] He will have finished the project by yesterday.
[8] He will have had to finish the project by yesterday.
[9] He will have to have finished the project by yesterday.
[10] He will have been able to finish the project by yesterday.
[11] He will be able to have finished the project by yesterday.
Many thanks,
Hiro
-
#11
Here is how I read these sentences:
He has already left.
Fact.
He will already have left by now.
If I try to call him, he
won’t
be there (at the time in the future when I try to call).
I surmise that he has left by now (based on of information I had
before
now).
It seems to me that will is still being used in a «future» sense in this sort of sentence, and must in a sense of «obligation» of sorts:
He must have left by now.
«Logic»
obligates
us to conclude that he has left by now.
He has already left by now.
Fact. Enough time has passed that we know.
Sentence [6] contains a non sequitur. «Has been back» does not make sense after «will have been depressed».
In sentences [7] through [11], «by yesterday» sounds odd to me. «By 3 P.M. yesterday» or «by yesterday at three» would sound less odd.
The first part of [6] and the rest of the sentences do make sense. In each case, something was expected to happen, based on information we had in the past, and the time it was expected to happen has passed, so we «expect» it has actually happened.
-
#12
[7] He will have finished the project by yesterday.
[8] He will have had to finish the project by yesterday.
[9] He will have to have finished the project by yesterday.
[10] He will have been able to finish the project by yesterday.
[11] He will be able to have finished the project by yesterday.
These sentences are not correct because you are using «yesterday» in a future sentence.
What you should say, is something like: He would have been able to finish the project by yesterday. (which is sometimes called a «future past tense».
HSS
Senior Member
-
#13
[5] Santa will have left his home by a week ago.
[7] He will have finished the project by yesterday.
[5] sounds fine whereas [7] does not.
It just leaves me wondering what makes the construct stand natural. Could anyone please help me with this.
Thanks,
Hiro
-
#14
[5] Santa will have left his home by a week ago.
[7] He will have finished the project by yesterday.[5] sounds fine whereas [7] does not.
It just leaves me wondering what makes the construct stand natural. Could anyone please help me with this.Thanks,
Hiro
I’m sorry, I didn’t look at those sentences, just the ones that I quoted.
But now that you mention it, [5] and [6] have the same problem.
[5] Santa will have left his home in a week.
[6] Chrisy would have been so depressed and cooped up in her home by a week ago, but she has been back to normal again thanks to the medication. This sentence has to be in the future past, since you have a confirmation of her being well in the present. You cannot use the future for something that has passed.
Cagey
post mod (English Only / Latin)
-
#15
I think «by a week ago» is strange. We would be more likely to say «by last week».
-
#16
I think «by a week ago» is strange. We would be more likely to say «by last week».
Absolutely!
-
#17
I’m sorry, I didn’t look at those sentences, just the ones that I quoted.
But now that you mention it, [5] and [6] have the same problem.[5] Santa will have left his home in a week.
[6] Chrisy would have been so depressed and cooped up in her home by a week ago, but she has been back to normal again thanks to the medication. This sentence has to be in the future past, since you have a confirmation of her being well in the present. You cannot use the future for something that has passed.
Actually, «will have» does work for times in the past, in the sense of «expecting» that something has happened. For example, «Santa
will have
left his home by Tuesday a week ago.» In this context, «will have» is less strong than «must have» because it expresses an expectation, if you will, rather than an «inescapable» conclusion. And «would have» in the same context would be ambiguous, meaning (possibly) that we used to expect or might have expected him to have left by the indicated date (but we no longer expect/suspect that now).
HSS
Senior Member
-
#18
Some say «Santa will have left his home by Tuesday a week ago» works, and some say «Santa will have left his home by last week» does too, but some say «Santa will have left his home by a week ago» does not. I wonder if it just depends on (the type of) the past-time adverbials used.
Also, some say that, if it is supposed to have done before just now, the time adverbials should express continuous relationship with the present time, such as «by now» and not «by last week» or «last week.»
Now, some also say with a time adverbial, such as «by last week,» and «by last week,» «would» should be used. Or, is it that «would» could be used more often and that it means different? Or, can «will» still be used?
Some state «Santa will have left his home by last week» would stand correct, and some say «He will have finished the project by yesterday» does not. Does whether you can use a past adverbial like these, maybe, hinge on the meaning of the rest of the sentence? All being «by something» here in this last question, does your comment or explanation to it apply to such an adverb as just «last week,» «yesterday,» etc.?
Many thanks, everyone.
Hiro
-
#19
If we have not seen or otherwise been made aware that something has indeed happened, it is to us, in effect, future since it is just as unknown to us as the «real» future. Even things that have already happened, if we don’t know they have happened, can be «supposed», «conjectured», «required», «expected», or «predicted». We can say «Santa is supposed to have left his home by last week» or «Santa may/must/will have left his home by last week.»
If we say «was supposed to have», «might have», «should have», or «would have», we put the supposing, conjecturing, prediction, or whatever, in the past. This allows us to add something like «but now we know he didn’t» based on updated information.
But present tense is supposed to, may, must, or will says we still don’t have full knowledge of the matter (whether Santa did or did not leave his home by last week).
For some reason, «by yesterday» does not seem as strange to me today as it did yesterday. If I psych myself up just right, I can almost read «He left by yesterday» as a good sentence. Today I don’t think there is anything wrong with «by yesterday» in such sentences, but without context or a little more explanation, it «has a tendency» to jar my senses.
HSS
Senior Member
-
#20
It’s been very informative. Millions of thanks.
I didn’t ask if «until some time» could also be used in this construct with this sense.
[12] Joseph will have been at the ball park until now.
[13] Joseph will have been at the ball park until three hours ago.
[14] Joseph will have been in this country until yesterday.
[15] Joseph would have been at the ball park until now.
[16] Joseph would have been at the ball park until three hours ago.
[17] Joseph would have been in this country until yesterday.
What do you think?
Hiro