From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Words and Pictures | |
---|---|
Theatrical film poster |
|
Directed by | Fred Schepisi |
Written by | Gerald Di Pego |
Produced by | Curtis Burch Gerald Di Pego |
Starring |
|
Cinematography | Ian Baker |
Edited by | Peter Honess |
Music by | Paul Grabowsky |
Distributed by | Roadside Attractions |
Release dates |
|
Running time |
111 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
Box office | $3.3 million[1] |
Words and Pictures is a 2013 American drama film directed by Fred Schepisi and starring Clive Owen, Juliette Binoche, and Keegan Connor Tracy. It was screened in the Gala Presentation section at the 2013 Toronto International Film Festival.[2][3]
Plot[edit]
Croyden is an upscale college preparatory school in Maine that hires teachers for their advanced courses who are accomplished professionals.
Jack Marcus is a writer and poet who teaches the advanced writing class. He’s a good teacher who inspires his students. He demonstrates how some carefully chosen words and phrases can stimulate the listener’s imagination to produce vivid mental imagery. One particular grievance of his involves the way in which young developing minds have been hijacked by the tedious distractions of modern technical gadgetry. He seems to be afflicted with writer’s block and hasn’t come out with any original work in several years. He publishes the school’s literary magazine, which the school administration is planning to shut down for budgetary reasons. He is a high-functioning alcoholic who chronically arrives late to work and is on the verge of being fired. He is divorced and has an adult son from his first marriage, but they have become estranged because of Jack’s drinking and general irresponsibility.
Dina Delsanto is an artist who has just been hired to teach the advanced art class, which has the same students as Jack’s writing class. Dina was a successful painter in New York City, but she now has difficulty painting or even walking and engaging in daily activities because of severe rheumatoid arthritis. She can no longer fasten buttons, open medicine bottles or hold paint brushes. She moved to Maine, where her sister and her mother live, so that they can help her during the spells when her arthritis worsens. As a teacher, she is a perfectionist with no interest in her students’ personal lives. She simply wants them to concentrate on creating the best works of art that they can. She shows them the difference between paintings that merely demonstrate craft and paintings that evoke feeling as well. She struggles to paint again by overcoming her physical limitations as well as her own artistic difficulties. She finally creates a good work of art and sets it aside to dry. She has, incidentally, professed a complete disdain for the spoken and printed word. She insists that artistically rendered images are the only worthwhile media for expressing «truth».
Jack’s colleagues and friends perceive him as attention-getting, obnoxious and charming. Once he gets wind of Dina’s personal philosophy, he provokes an argument with her over which is more important, words or pictures. Their students are drawn into the conflict with class assignments demonstrating the superiority of words over pictures or pictures over words. Dina agrees to have her students contribute their own works of art to Jack’s literary magazine. They decide to have an assembly in which each side will put on a presentation arguing the case for words and for pictures. The school administration becomes impressed enough with all of this activity to retain his services as an instructor.
Jack pursues Dina romantically and ultimately succeeds. But, during his first night over, he gets drunk on her vodka and crashes headlong into her newest painting. He further confesses to plagiarizing a poem from his own son, a moral failing for which Dina is even more unforgiving. She throws him out and tells him she doesn’t want to have anything more to do with him.
He confesses the plagiarism to the school board and hands in his resignation. He asks only to continue for the rest of the year and put on the War on Words and Pictures assembly program. The board grants him his request, and the movie concludes with a satisfying resolution at the aforementioned assembly.
Cast[edit]
- Clive Owen as Jack Marcus
- Juliette Binoche as Dina Delsanto
- Keegan Connor Tracy as Ellen
- Bruce Davison as Walt
- Amy Brenneman as Elspeth
- Adam DiMarco as Swint
- Valerie Tian as Emily
- Navid Negahban as Rashid
- Janet Kidder as Sabine
- David Lewis as Tom
Reception[edit]
Box office[edit]
Words and Pictures grossed $2,171,257 in the United States and $1,175,000 in other territories, for a worldwide gross of $3,346,257.[1]
Critical response[edit]
On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 43% based on 95 reviews, with an average rating of 5.5/10. The site’s critical consensus reads: «While both talented performers in their own right, Juliette Binoche and Clive Owen are decidedly mismatched in Words and Pictures, and they aren’t done many favors by the movie’s awkwardly constructed screenplay.»[4] On Metacritic, the film has a score of 49 out of 100, based on 26 critics, indicating «mixed or average reviews».[5]
Odie Henderson of RogerEbert.com gave the film only one and a half stars and wrote: «Unfortunately, ‘Words and Pictures’ fails at portraying both titular nouns. The screenplay by Gerald Di Pego («Phenomenon») is full of subpar dialogue, one-dimensional characters, scenes that belong in a different movie, other scenes that belong in the trash, multiple rom-com sins of cliché and a warped, stalkerish notion of what constitutes romance. When the hero’s idea of a term of endearment to the heroine is «you cold-hearted ice bitch,» one wonders what he’d say if he were pissed at her.»[6] Deborah Young of The Hollywood Reporter wrote: «Schepisi, whose last film was his adaptation The Eye of the Storm, based on an Australian classic, is a general who marshals actors to bring emotional depth to almost any kind of screenplay. Here the human elements take the foreground, and romance comes trailing along forlornly behind. Not that the chemistry isn’t there between Owen and Binoche, who has rarely looked so beautiful onscreen, even playing a woman with physical handicaps. But the strange reticence of the scene when the two finally hit the hay feels like a throwback to the 1930s, including a huge cutaway that ends with the protags in bed with the sheets pulled up to their necks, saying how great it all was.»[7]
Claudia Puig of USA Today gave Words and Pictures three and half stars and stated: «A thoughtful film about ideas — creativity, the power of language and the eloquence of visuals — it features two impeccable performances full of vitality. Clive Owen plays Jack Marcus, a voluble prep school English teacher who laments the reductive nature of social media. Juliette Binoche is Dina Delsanto, an Italian-born expressionist painter and art instructor at the same elite New England school. Both are disillusioned with life and education, and neither suffers fools. They are tart-tongued and cantankerous, but engaging.»[8] Kyle Smith of New York Post gave the film only one out of four stars and wrote: «Predictability ensues in ’80s-rom-com style — he’s words, she’s pictures, get it? — as everyone pretends the cloddish dialogue is witty.»[9]
References[edit]
- ^ a b «Words and Pictures». Box Office Mojo. Retrieved August 22, 2014.
- ^ «Words and Pictures». TIFF. Retrieved August 16, 2013.
- ^ «Toronto Adds 75+ Titles To 2013 Edition». Indiewire. Retrieved August 16, 2013.
- ^ «WORDS AND PICTURES (2014)». Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved August 4, 2017.
- ^ «Words and Pictures 2014». Metacritic. Retrieved August 4, 2017.
- ^ Henderson, Odie. «WORDS AND PICTURES». RogerEbert.com. Retrieved August 4, 2017.
- ^ Young, Deborah. «Words and Pictures: Toronto Review». The Hollywood Reporter.
- ^ Puig, Claudia. «‘Words and Pictures’ plays with the meaning of passion». USA Today. Retrieved August 4, 2017.
- ^ Smith, Kyle. «Clive Owen stumbles in formulaic ‘Words and Pictures’«. New York Post.
External links[edit]
- Words and Pictures at IMDb
- Words and Pictures at Box Office Mojo
- Words and Pictures at AllMovie
- Words and Pictures film trailer at YouTube
It’s a rare film that manages to be tedious and fascinating at the same time, but that’s precisely what happens with the clumsily-named and executed Words And Pictures. The film’s central conceit is right there in its title: a battle for supremacy unfolds between an English teacher (words) and his new colleague, who schools students in the fine arts (pictures). It shouldn’t work at all, especially when the relationship moves predictably into romantic territory. But it’s tough to completely dismiss the film when its awkward screenplay also features two intriguing central characters, played with subtle, almost miraculous depth by Clive Owen and Juliette Binoche.
English teacher Jack Marcus (Owen) is on the brink of academic implosion: his job is on the line, he’s barely making it to his classes on time, and he’s drinking a little too much for anyone’s comfort. But, just as things are looking really bleak, his downward trajectory is briefly interrupted by the arrival of Dina Delsanto (Binoche), a revered artist who’s losing her ability to make art as her body is increasingly ravaged by the aches and pains of rheumatoid arthritis. She values imagery and art; he treasures words and literature — their clash fires up their students’ imaginations, even as they bicker and spar their way into an evident mutual attraction.
There’s no denying that the film rests on an awkward foundation: the script keeps returning to the ridiculous dichotomy it establishes between words and pictures, pitting Marcus against Delsanto in a competition that makes very little sense. It’s all tied up with a subplot involving shy arts student Emily (Valerie Tian), whose ability to come out of her shell to be the artist she can be is all wrapped up with issues of sexual harassment and public humiliation. Frankly, it’s just not very good.
What is very good about the film is its two central characters, and the spiky, difficult and joyfully equal relationship that springs up between them. There’s so much depth, sadness and maturity layered into Marcus and Delsanto that it’s absolutely fascinating just to watch them in action, together and apart. Both characters have rough edges that aren’t sanded away, and the odd fireworks between them work precisely because both their lives have stalled: Marcus is a charming mess who lost himself somewhere along the way; Delsanto is a brilliant artist who can no longer express herself the way she wants to. Somehow, they wind up inspiring each other to do better and be better — and, instead of feeling horribly mawkish, it works.
That’s due in no small part to the excellent work done by the two lead actors. Owen sinks thoroughly into the part of Marcus, dialling up the charm and the horror of his character in equal measure. The film doesn’t soften or romanticise Marcus and his problems, which gives Owen plenty of great character stuff to do. Binoche, too, has ample room to uncover the sad, yearning soul of a whip-smart, independent woman whose illness has stolen not just her art but also a little of her dignity.
Ultimately, the fantastic and fascinating interplay between the two actors and characters are pretty much worth the price of admission. They’re surrounded by an odd, awkward beast of a movie, built on a very shaky foundation. But their brave, deep performances and bittersweet chemistry come very close to making Words And Pictures worth a lot more than it really is.
What to know
While both talented performers in their own right, Juliette Binoche and Clive Owen are decidedly mismatched in Words and Pictures, and they aren’t done many favors by the movie’s awkwardly constructed screenplay.
Read critic reviews
Rent/buy
Rent/buy
Rent/buy
Words and Pictures
Photos
Movie Info
An art teacher and English teacher have a competition and allow students to vote on the importance of words and pictures.
-
Rating:
PG-13 (Nude Sketches|Language|Sexual Material|Some Mature Thematic Material)
-
Genre:
Comedy,
Drama,
Romance
-
Original Language:
English -
Director:
Fred Schepisi
-
Producer:
Curtis Burch,
Gary Cogill,
Gerald Di Pego,
Frankey Dey
-
Writer:
Gerald Di Pego
-
Release Date (Theaters):
May 23, 2014
limited
-
Release Date (Streaming):
Sep 9, 2014
-
Box Office (Gross USA):
$2.2M -
Runtime:
1h 51m
-
Distributor:
Roadside Attractions
-
Production Co:
Latitude Productions,
Lascaux Films
Cast & Crew
News & Interviews for Words and Pictures
Critic Reviews for Words and Pictures
Audience Reviews for Words and Pictures
-
Oct 01, 2014
Very different American romantic drama directed by 74-year old Aussie director Fred Schepisi brings a very odd mixture of characters. It brings the vast experience of a winning director, a mature view of life and immature approach and reactions to events from that life in the story, excellent acting, and it almost seems like a tribute for a profession which started all other professions — teaching! I am glad that was screened in the Gala Presentation section at the 2013 Toronto International Film Festival, but this is not Schepisi’s best work — far from it!
The story background is happening at Croyden, a wealthy prep school in Maine that hires teachers for their advanced courses who are accomplished professionals. Jack Marcus is supposedly one of those — a writer and poet who teach the advanced writing class. He loves who he does, he is good in it, challenging and inspiring his students. Describing how good writing creates an image, like Haiku or John Updyke’s descriptions, his students understand the significance of the words. But, despite being a published author, he hasn’t written or published anything for years, and gets a writer’s block when he tries to write. The school literary magazine, which is his pride and joy, is going to be axed for budgetary reasons, and this alcoholic, who arrives late to work and is on the verge of being fired, decides to fight. It is not easy fighting back when school hears that he has been banned from the local restaurant because of his drunken behaviour and his adult son from his marriage becomes estranged because of Jack’s drinking and irresponsibility… Jack still does it, with a very unlikely partner!
I think that we would all have difficulty finding a romantic drama these days with such less sympathetic characters as Jack Marcus (Clive Owen) and Dina Delsanto (Juliette Binoche). Old fashioned directing felt very comfortable but the odd thing here was the screenplay. At the end felt like few life moments put together for some eulogy not a carefully edited artistic creation — mainly because of the very unconventionally structured screenplay. It seems that t the end I enjoyed it, but my thoughts are that this could be an outstanding film if the screenplay was different.
Super Reviewer
-
Sep 11, 2014
Ah, yes, the classic album that broke Dream Theater out… right? Man, I am working surprisingly hard to not call this film «Words and Images», and it would be a whole lot easier if Bob Snider, who made an EP titled «Words and Pictures», was nearly as notorious as Dream Theater, which should tell you just how obscure Snider is. Fred Schepisi must be a bit of a Dream Theater fans, because long before this, he did «Six Degrees of Inner Turbul-I mean, «Six Degrees of Separation», although Schepisi’s films aren’t quite as exciting a Dream Theater song. I don’t know how much intrigue you can get out of a romantic film that’s about an English teacher falling in love with an abstract painter, and griping about kids and their cell phones along the way. Sorry, Clive Owen, but I don’t think that a picture is worth a thousand words anymore, because Twitter can only hold 140 characters. Now, I guess this picture, on the other hand, is well worth a thousand words, because just about all it is is a whole lot of chatter. No, this film is more interesting than I jokingly make it sound, but not exactly by a long shot, no matter how overblown it may get, at least with characterization.
Well, the characters aren’t so much overblown, as much as their basic nature is, with many supporting character types being one-dimensional and contrived (Adam DiMarco’s role of the hot-headed «lady’s man» is embarrassing), while the leads prove to be only slightly richer, featuring few layers that aren’t worn by the performers, and aren’t plentiful enough to compensate for the improbably overwrought flaws that make the protagonists not very sympathetic, or even likable. The flimsy character drawing is more a fault with script than it is with the story concept, although one has to give Gerald Di Pego’s writing credit for trying to cloyingly liven up a story that is startlingly thin, with no real consequence, or conflicts beyond a ludicrous feud between two overly proud teachers. The story is problematic, as is the scripting, for misguided characterization is further corrupted by characters and expository traits which are as unevenly used as dramatic touches which are about as contrived as the characterization is in most every other way, which isn’t to say that writing issues end there, for there is also some overblown wit to dialogue and flatness to humor, made all the worse by familiarity. This film may have a refreshingly respectable atmosphere, and smart highlights in writing, but it’s rich with clichés, in the writing and even in the plotting, which follows a seriously predictable path that I could get behind more comfortably if it didn’t demand so much patience. So thin and flimsy, this film run nearly two hours in length, and, oh man, that is so blasted long, and a whole lot of aimless, if not monotonous fat around the edges to be made all the more palpable by a dry atmosphere that, while plenty respectable, is kind of dulling, as well as detrimental to a sense of momentum that was always to be limited. This is an inconsequential story concept, and it cannot afford to be so heavily bombard with contrivances, clichés, cheese and, of course, monotony, backed by a bland atmosphere, thus making for a film that is not simply underwhelming, but run a great risk of falling pretty deeply into mediocrity. Decency is maintained by a hair, but maintained nonetheless, because as flimsy as this film is, it has a fair bit about it that’s worth commending, with even its story concept having some form of intrigue.
As seriously inconsequential as this film’s story concept is, there is some intrigue to themes regarding the importance of words and visuals, particularly when it falls behind conflicts and major plotting elements that, while contrived and unbelievable, have a certain color, and, with it, a potential for liveliness. Gerald Di Pego’s script doesn’t really carry too much liveliness, because there’s something lazy about it in most every way, enough so for it to play an instrumental role in rendering the final product mediocre that would be more devastating if it didn’t have its strengths, such a clever, if a little contrived dialogue to make up for the misses in the hit-or-mess, often derivative humor, and hold your attention through all of the limp spells in plotting. In a lot of areas, Di Pego’s script is seriously misguided, and in a few key areas, it’s smarter than the average flick of this type, with a certain respectability to compliment the color, with the help of Fred Schepisi’s direction. Well, I don’t know if Schepisi’s storytelling is all that colorful, because it’s so dry, and yet, such a steady pace, while emphatic of an unreasonable length, carries an aura of respectability that, when complimentary to the wit of the writing, really endears those willing to take this film for what it is, as an either clichéd fluff piece, or overlong clever twist on the usual rom-com. Yeah, there is ultimately little to praise, and plenty to criticize, and that poses a great threat that would be greater if it wasn’t for those distinct strengths in the writing and direction, or for a pair of leads who are more than this film, or even their roles deserve. There’s not much dimension to any characters, really, but the thin areas in the characterization of the lead roles are particularly unnerving, carrying a certain unlikability that is adequately compensated for by their portrayals’ being of relatively considerable quality, with Juliette Binoche carrying the passion and frustration of an artist with rheumatoid arthritis who seeks for something she can hold onto and fight for, while Clive Owen, in a surprisingly layered performance, proves to be thoroughly charismatic as a clever jerk, whose eventual redemption is sold by the emotional commitment in Owen that sells a man’s coming to terms with his flaws and mistakes. If there are dramatically effective moments, then they are powered by the leads, but perhaps more than anything, Binoche and Owen define the charm of this romantic-comedy, which could have fallen flat, even with its wit, but is saved as a fair vehicle for the leads’ talent, and for other endearing elements, however limited they may be.
In conclusion, the story is inconsequential and hard to buy into, especially with a script that delivers on contrived characterization, some flat spots in the wit, a wealth of clichés, and excessive dragging that is made all the more palpable by a certain dry, almost bland atmosphere, thus, the final product all but collapses as mediocre, saved by the intriguingly smart aspects of the story concept, writing and direction, and by the strong performances by Juliette Binoche and Clive Owen which secure Fred Schepisi’s «Words and Pictures» as an ultimately endearing, if challenging rom-com portrait on the majesty of words and art, and their authors.
2.5/5 — Fair
Super Reviewer
-
Jul 18, 2014
Showy romantic drama formula, in a weighty jive.
Super Reviewer
- Home
- Genre
- Country
- Movies
- TV Shows
- Top IMDB
- Android App
A skill instructor along with an English teacher sort a rivalry that ultimately eventually ends up having a contest at their school where pupils decide whether pictures or words are essential.
Watch Words and Pictures Online Free
Words and Pictures Online Free
Where to watch Words and Pictures
Words and Pictures movie free online
Words and Pictures free online
You may also like
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
HD
MoviesJoy is a Free Movies streaming site with zero ads.
We let you watch movies online without having to register or paying, with over 10000 movies and
TV-Series.
You can also Download full movies from MoviesJoy and watch it later if you want.
MoviesJoy does not store any files on our server, we only linked to the media which is hosted on 3rd party services.
© MoviesJoy
Фильм
Любовь в словах и картинках
Words and Pictures, США, 2013
О фильме В ролях Похожие
Мелодрама из жизни педагогов
Для преподавателя английского языка (Клайв Оуэн) весь мир — это слова, для преподавательницы живописи (Жюльетт Бинош) — картины. Пока они пытаются выяснить, кто же из них прав, попутно вовлекая в это состязание своих учеников, жизнь преподносит им свой урок. Искусствоведческая комедия про противоположности, которые притягиваются друг к другу.
Продолжительность1 час 51 минута
Дата выхода6 сентября 2013
Возрастное ограничение18+
Актеры
Киган Коннор Трейси, Клайв Оуэн, Жюльетт Бинош, Эми Бреннеман, Брюс Дэвисон, Навид Негабан, Адам ДиМарко, Валерия Тиан, Джанет Киддер, Дэвид Льюис,
лучших фильмов о любви
«Три мушкетера» и темнокожий д’Артаньян: веселое кино из разряда «так плохо, что уже хорошо»
Прет как панк: сериал «Король и Шут» в семи песнях
Кинопремьеры недели: «Блуждающая Земля-2», «Звезды в полдень», «Земля Алькаррас» и «Возвращение в Сеул»
Создайте уникальную страницу своего события на «Афише»
Это возможность рассказать о нем многомиллионной аудитории и увеличить посещаемость