Why is a lot not one word

Last Update: Jan 03, 2023

This is a question our experts keep getting from time to time. Now, we have got the complete detailed explanation and answer for everyone, who is interested!


Asked by: Doyle Steuber PhD

Score: 4.8/5
(48 votes)

Alot is a common misspelling of a lot. A lot should always be spelled as two words. The meaning of a lot depends on the context. Usually, it means “many” or “to a great extent.” Let’s look at some examples.

Why is alot Not one word?

While it may be common to see the word “alot” throughout Internet commenting or text messaging, the word is never seen in print, and the reason is simple: it isn’t an actual word. That’s right.

Why is alot incorrect?

For example, a lot means a large quantity of something, like room or space. You know alot is incorrect because there’s no room between the “a” and the “l.” On the other hand, you know that a lot is correct because there is a lot of space between the”a” and the “l.” “Alot” is a common misspelling of the phrase “a lot.”

Where did alot come from?

The word was adopted from Germanic into the Romanic languages (compare lottery, lotto). Meaning «choice resulting from the casting of lots» first attested c. 1200.

Is alot a word in Scrabble?

No, alot is not in the scrabble dictionary.

35 related questions found

Is alot one-word or 2?

Alot is a common misspelling of a lot. A lot should always be spelled as two words. The meaning of a lot depends on the context.

Do you say a lot or alot?

First thing’s first: «alot» is not a word. If you want to say that someone has a vast number of things, you would say they have «a lot» of things. «A lot» is always two words. «Allot» means to give or apportion something to someone as a share or task.

Is alot a word in the dictionary?

A lot can seem like it should be a single word—and maybe one day the spelling alot will appear in this dictionary. But right now, the two-word spelling a lot is the one that’s recognized as standard.

Who did 21 Savage sample on a lot?

The song was written by 21 Savage, Cole, and its producers DJ Dahi and J. White Did It. It samples «I Love You» by East of Underground, which is a cover of «I Love You for All Seasons», performed by The Fuzz; The Fuzz member Shelia Young is credited as a co-writer.

Is alot a word in any language?

The noun “lot” means to “a great extent or a large amount.” And the “a” serves as an indefinite article, which is used to introduce a noun that is not specific. That’s why “alot,” which is not a real word and a common misspelling of a lot, is highlighted as a typo in most English language grammar checkers and software.

When should a lot be used?

A lot is a phrase that can be used appropriately in a lot of situations. The word lot can be used as a noun, verb, pronoun, or adverb. When you say, «I play a lot of soccer,» you’re using lot as an adverb; when you say, «I have a lot of marbles,» you’re using lot as a pronoun.

Can you end a sentence with a lot?

a lot means very often or very much. It is used as an adverb. It often comes at the end of a sentence and never before a noun.

Does alot have a space?

To summarize, there should not be any confusion with the use of a lot and alot. The correct form requires a space–a lot–and the one without space, alot, is not an acceptable word.

When did alright become a word?

The form alright is a one-word spelling of the phrase all right that made its first appearance in the 1880s. Alright is commonly used in written dialogue and informal writing, but all right is the only acceptable form in edited writing.

How do you use the word lot in a sentence?

a lot in a sentence

  1. It took me a lot longer than a lot of people.
  2. I went through a lot in my career in law enforcement,
  3. A lot of things were happening emotionally at the same time.
  4. I am and I know a lot of my friends are.
  5. They can feel that there is a lot of excitement here,
  6. I think the tides have a lot to do with it,

Is all right one-word?

Although the one-word spelling of alright is seen in informal writing, teachers and editors will always consider it incorrect. To use the expression with impunity, it is best to spell it as two words: all right.

What song is a lot sampled from?

21 Savage feat. J. Cole’s ‘A Lot’ sample of East of Underground’s ‘I Love You’ | WhoSampled.

What is considered a lot?

For example, Merriam-Webster defines several as «more than two but less than many». The same several people you sent an email to could be described as a few people when you want to say the number is fewer than someone thinks it is: … A lot is a large enough number to impress and a few is close to none.

What part of speech is a lot?

As a noun, «lot» means «a large extent,» «a large amount,» or «a large number.» As an adverb, «a lot» means «to a great extent» or «to a great degree.» Here are some examples of «a lot» in a sentence: Mark has a lot of toys. («Lot» is a noun in this example.)

Is aswell one word UK?

No matter how you use it, the expression “as well” is always two words, despite the fact that many people seem to think it should be spelled “aswell.” Examples: “I don’t like plastic trees as well as real ones for Christmas.” “Now that we’ve opened our stockings, let’s open our other presents as well.”

Is it everyday or every day?

Everyday, one word, is an adjective meaning «used or seen daily,» or «ordinary.» «The phone calls were an everyday occurrence.» Every day, two words, is an adverb phrase meaning «daily» or «every weekday.» «They go to the coffee shop every day.» One trick to remember which is which is to see if you can put another word …

No, they aren’t doing the same thing.

It’s because these a- words are mostly ancient prepositional phrases in origin that eventually got squished together — but into adverbs, not quantifiers or adjectives. Consider aback, abroad, above, afoot, across, afar, ahead, ajar, akin, alike, aloud, amid, apart, atop, away.

That a- portion was an unstressed version of the word on way back in Old English, according to Oxford Dictionaries Online. As a prefix it most often means on or to something, or in that manner.

So the process that created all these fused prepositional phrases turned to adverbs is not one that would give rise to such things as *alot, *alittle, *abit, *abig, *afat, *acool, *abad, *anold.

Articles and prepositions aren’t the same thing, so to‑day you aren’t going to get an adjective by fusing an article to an adjective.
For that we have a newt, an orange, an apron, a nickname:)

More seriously, this very thing did once happen aforetimes to give us another. Then again, whether other counts as an adjective is dubious in modern analysis.
In any event, it is not a productive process now‑a‑days.

Is a lot singular or plural? The answer is “It can be either.” A lot can modify a noun, giving an indefinite idea of quantity. But on its own it can also be an indefinite pronoun.

(As a quick aside, is the word people singular or plural? Give up? It’s always plural.)

Both of the following are correct: There is a lot of bread and
There are a lot of loaves.

For example, you can say A lot of flour is required for this recipe or A lot is required for this recipe. Here, a lot takes a singular verb (is).

Why? Because flour is a “noncount noun” and functions as singular.

But you can also say A lot of people like pizza or A lot like pizza. Here, a lot takes a plural verb (like).

Why? Because people is a “count noun”—you could arrive at an exact number (if you felt like spending your time that way).

A noun doesn’t have to end in -s to be plural: people, men, women, feet

We’ll get some answers to the question Is a lot singular or plural? in the example sentences below.

Singular a lot

  • A lot of time has passed.

[time is singular so it takes a singular verb]

  • There is a lot to do today.

[a lot refers to an unstated singular noun—for example, work]

Plural a lot

  • A lot of people like to travel.

[people is plural so it takes a plural verb]

  • There are a lot in the box.

[a lot refers to an unstated plural noun—for example, pens]

Is A Lot Singular or Plural? That Depends

5-1-2-singular-and-plural-nouns1-300x163-1478695

Don’t let the a in a lot fool you. While the indefinite article a is the go-to marker for singular in English (a cat, a policy, a(n) eggplant), it just doesn’t play that role in a lot, which acts as a unit.

In fact, you could use much in place of a lot for cases where the singular form is needed, and many in place of a lot in cases where the plural is needed:

Much is required for this recipe. [where much replaces a lot of flour]

Many like pizza. [where many replaces a lot of people]

Does anyone actually say Much is required for this recipe when talking about flour? Probably not. It’s just to illustrate the point.

We use many above because people is plural. (The same goes for children, feet, fish, and other plural nouns that don’t end in s.)

Notes

Several points bear mentioning when we talk about whether a lot is singular or plural:

  • First, a lot is two words. Alot doesn’t exist. (But  allot is a word.)
  • Second, the word a lot, when it means “a piece of land” or “the location of a movie studio,” is singular. Always. For example, There’s a lot at the end of the street that my aunt wants to buy.
  • Third, people are more likely to take note (and/or care) if your usage is correct in writing. Speech is another story.

RedLine’s company philosophy is that usage matters primarily in writing. This is because image, brand, perception of professionalism, etc. are at stake. This isn’t to say that how you speak has no consequence; it just means that everyday conversations between people are basically a linguistic free-for-all.

Usage matters more in writing than it does in most types of speech.

But writing is different.

In fact, clients pay us to correct their writing and make it as polished as possible both in grammatical and stylistic terms. But speech? Never.
We don’t go around correcting people’s speech on the street. Why? For starters, it’s obnoxious. But it’s also unnecessary. Speech is fluid and spontaneous. By contrast, a piece of writing is planned and can be edited multiple times prior to publication.
So go ahead and say There’s a lot of reasons  why I want to go—just don’t write it.

Now, if you want to learn to write better (especially online), check out these examples of great writing and then see our post on writing web content that works.

And the next time a stranger stops you on the street to ask you the question Is a lot singular or plural? tell him, “My good man, it can be either.”

Further Reading

If you liked this post, share it! You can also follow RedLine on Facebook.

Speaking of Facebook, the company practically embraces they as a singular pronoun. And it looks the Washington Post is okay with it, too.

There is a surprising amount of confusion between these two words (one of which isn’t actually a word) and which is the correct form to appear in your sentences.

Today, I want to go over the difference between a lot vs. alot and show you a few tricks to remember which of them to use. After reading this post, you won’t ever confuse them again.

While it may be common to see the word “alot” throughout Internet commenting or text messaging, the word is never seen in print, and the reason is simple: it isn’t an actual word.

That’s right. If you go to any dictionary, you will not find the word “alot” as an entry, which makes it all the more interesting why the confusion between the two exists.

What Is a “Lot”?

are alot or a lot the same wordsThe two-word construction a lot is just that: two separate words. You have the article a and the noun lot. The word lot is defined as, “a large number or amount, a great deal.”

For example,

  • You just drank a lot of milk with dinner.
  • Your car uses a lot of gas.
  • You read a lot of books.

Just as you wouldn’t combine other instances of article + noun constructions in your sentences, adog, acat, ahorse, etc., you don’t combine the two words a lot. There’s no rhyme or reason to why people combine the words, but plenty of people make the mistake.

And no one knows exactly why. It could be that since the word lot isn’t used in many other instances besides the phrase a lot that writers began to think of alot as the actual word being used and not lot.

Other uses of lot, such as a beautiful lot of land or a parking lot, often pale in comparison to the frequency of the phrase a lot, so it’s easy to see how people could get mixed up. Even this, however, isn’t a totally convincing reason because the plural use of lot (lots) is used correctly with great frequency.

Another possible explanation is the similar features the phrase a lot has with the unrelated word allot.

When to Use Allot

Despite sounding similar to—and being spelled similar as—a lot, the single word allot is an unrelated verb. To allot something is “to give or apportion something to someone as a share.”

For example,

  • Will you please allot me my share of the inheritance?
  • The lawyer allotted the remained assets from the will.
  • During the debate, equal time will be allotted to each party.

As I said above, the fact that this word sounds alike and looks similar to a lot may cause some people to confuse the two.

Remember the Difference

allot vs alot grammarNow that we know a lot is the correct choice for our sentences, here are a few tricks to remember this fact.

Something my grade school English teacher would say to help us remember is,

  • A lot is a lot of words.

Another great trick I learned from a reader of mine is similar to the analogy I gave above about combining words like a dog into adog.

  • You cannot say “alittle,” so you cannot say “alot.”

Makes sense doesn’t it?

Summary

It’s important to keep track of these two words in your writing because alot vs. a lot are very different.

Alot is not a word.

A lot is the correct choice.

Contents

  • 1 Alot vs. A lot?
  • 2 What Is a “Lot”?
  • 3 When to Use Allot
  • 4 Remember the Difference
  • 5 Summary

  • #1

From The Telegraph:

“I feel like I have been here about five years!” he says. “A lot has happened in that period of time.”

From The Independent:

«Since we were last on air a lot of things have happened,» reflected Brand. «There’s been Colonel Gaddafi. He’s gone now. There’s been the Arab Spring, riots all over London…»

It seems to me that the two boldfaced clauses mean the same thing. In other words, «a lot» in the former is understood as «a lot of things» as in the latter. However, the number treatment of the two is different.

Now, here’s another quote from BBC Sport:

«Everybody in our team has played in a Grand Slam game, a lot have played in two and some have even played in three Grand Slam games,» said Edwards.

And here, «a lot» means «a lot of our players» and is treated as a plural.

How am I to understand the different treatment of «a lot» in the first and the third examples?

    • #2

    The third example looks like a typo. I have never heard this before.

    In the first quote «a lot» is treated as singular. In the second «a lot of things» is treated as plural because of the addition of the plural «things.»

    It’s a bit difficult for me to explain, so I will try to give a parallel example.

    «My family has a dog.» — The verb form is singular.
    «My family members (or the members of my family) have a dog.» — The verb form is plural.

    Sorry, this isn’t the best of examples because the second sentence is awkward and would not normally be used.

    Last edited: Mar 25, 2013

    Keith Bradford


    • #3

    A lot simply means a batch. In an auction, each item for sale is a lot; in America, an area of land is also called a lot.

    By extension, it means «a large number/quantity of things/people». It behaves like the noun it refers to. If that is a plural noun, a lot is plural; if there is no noun (as in your first example), a lot is singular because it means «a large amount». In the third example it means «many of our players».

    Does that help?

    • #4

    So if «a lot» is used alone without an «of» phrase, it is always singular, unless «a lot» represents people? Then it’s plural?

    PaulQ


    • #5

    So if «a lot» is used alone without an «of» phrase, it is always singular,

    Yes

    unless «a lot» represents people? Then it’s plural?

    No.

    The pack of wolves attacked and a lot were shot

    A lot does not affect the verb because it has the meaning of much or many. The verb is determined by the noun to which «a lot» refers, even if the noun is unstated.

    a lot operates in the same way as much or many:

    Count nouns:

    «We have hundreds of watches in the warehouse, but a lot [of them]/[of the watches] are broken.» = «We have hundreds of watches in the warehouse, but many [of them]/[of the watches] are broken.»

    «The police say they need more money and a lot [of them]/[of the officers] are unhappy» = «The police say they need more money and many [of them]/[of the officers] are unhappy»

    Non-count nouns:

    A: «A lot of time has passed since he died.» = «Much time has passed since he died.»

    A: «A lot of money is needed to buy that house.» = «Much money is needed to buy that house.»

    On its own:

    A lot has happened in that period of time.” = Much has happened in that period of time.”/ Many things have happened in that period of time.

    A lot were killed in the war = Many were killed during the war. (It does not matter what ‘a lot’ refers to; there was a plurality.)

    Last edited: Mar 26, 2013

    • #6

    A lot does not affect the verb because it has the meaning of much or many. The verb is determined by the noun to which «a lot» refers, even if the noun is unstated.

    That’s actually what I thought before I came across the first two examples as shown in the OP.

    As I stated in the OP, «a lot» in the first example is understood as «a lot of things» as shown in the second. So «the noun to which a lot refers» in the first example (even though the noun is unstated) is «things» as in «a lot of things.»

    But the verb «has» in the first example is not «determined by the noun to which a lot refers.» Hence, my question.

    • #7

    One way to think of this is «lot» can be countable or uncountable and this will determine singular vs plural. The first example changes when you insert the «understood» words as it switches from one to the other.

    Vovan


    • #8

    Jung Kim

    Just change any phrase containing «a lot» into a phrase with «much/many» — and everything will become clear for you.:)

    1) “A lot (=much) has happened in that period of time.”

    2) «Since we were last on air a lot of things (=many things) have happened

    3) «Everybody in our team has played in a Grand Slam game, a lot (=many players) have played in two and some have even played in three Grand Slam games.»

    • #9

    Vovan, I guess the same question remains unresolved: why not this change?

    A lot (=many things) have happened in that period of time.

    Vovan


    • #10

    Jung Kim

    why not this change?

    A lot (=many things) have happened in that period of time.

    Well, in the second setence you had «a lot of things» which I advised to turn into «many things».

    In the first sentence all you have is «a lot» which can only be turned into «much»; there’s no such word as «things» in the original.

    You can’t change too much: all changes must be very formal.

    Hope that helps.

    • #11

    I guess my question is why ‘a lot’ in (1) cannot be changed into ‘many things’ when you can change ‘a lot’ in (3) into ‘many players’.

    Vovan


    • #12

    Jung Kim

    Because in the third sentence «players» are obviously implied in the text before («Everybody in our team»); also, we can’t change «a lot» into «much» here because «much» can’t play football!

    In the first sentence, no «things» are explicitly said or implied in the text before («“I feel like I have been here about five years!” ) — except for… «years»:) but you don’t mean them, you mean «much».

    If you understand what «much has happened» is

    , you can’t have dufficulty turning it into «a lot has happened». I could advise you to start with

    what you want to say

    , then expressing it with «much/many», then transforming «much/many» into «a lot (of)». You’ll see how to do it right!

    • #13

    One way to think of this is «lot» can be countable or uncountable and this will determine singular vs plural. The first example changes when you insert the «understood» words as it switches from one to the other.

    So do you mean that «a lot have happened» is also grammatical and could be used instead of «a lot has happened» in the first example?

    Keith Bradford


    • #14

    So do you mean that «a lot have happened» is also grammatical and could be used instead of «a lot has happened» in the first example?

    No. Basically, lot = a large amount, a large quantity. Amount and quantity are both singular.
    Lot becomes plural only when you

    know

    that it means a large number (of plural things or people).

    • #15

    I’ve found the phrase «a lot have happened» in these links and is the phrase a mistake in both of these links?

    2013 is coming fast. In a few hours, it’ll be 1st January, 2013. A lot have happened in 2012. It’s time to write them down and move on to 2013.

    — From a blog

    I don’t think any of the reforms that have happened in New Orleans, and a lot have happened, would’ve happened without that collection of leaders at the table.

    — From a transcript of What is the New Orleans Criminal Justice Leadership Alliance? by Michael Jacobson

    wandle


    • #16

    In the second case, ‘a lot’ refers to the reforms that have happened. Here, ‘a lot’ means ‘many’. Hence the plural.

    In the first case, you have not given a link, but because of the words ‘It’s time to write them down’ it appears that the writer is referring to a plural noun such as ‘events’ from an earlier sentence or heading. If so, ‘a lot’ means ‘many’ in this case too.

    However, neither of these is good English in my view and instead ‘many things’ should have been used in the first case and ‘many’ in the second (better again: ‘there have been many’).

    Last edited: Mar 26, 2013

    • #17

    I did give the link to the first case, you’d know it if you clicked on «blog».
    You said that ‘a lot have happened’ is not good English.
    What if I used ‘a lot has happened’ instead in both the cases?
    Would it be better English then in both the cases?

    • #18

    Argh! This is getting confusing!

    «A lot» will always be treated as singular unless we immediately think of it as shorthand for «a lot of X’s.» Here’s a test: when you see «a lot,» ask yourself «A lot of what?» If one word immediately springs to mind, then «a lot» will probably be treated as plural.

    I don’t think any of the reforms that have happened in New Orleans, and a lot have happened

    The pack of wolves attacked and a lot were shot

    In both of these examples, there are immediate answers to the question — «a lot of reforms» and «a lot of wolves.» So we think of «a lot» as being a short form of that longer phrase, and put in the plural verbs.

    Everybody in our team has played in a Grand Slam game, a lot have played in two

    This one is more controversial. Did you notice how Rejci didn’t like it? This is because if you ask «A lot of what?» you will eventually come up with «a lot of the people on the team,» but that noun doesn’t explicitly show up in the previous sentence​, so it’s not as immediate.

    wandle


    • #19

    What if I used ‘a lot has happened’ instead in both the cases?
    Would it be better English then in both the cases?

    I have not been able to access the link for the first case, but still going on the assumption made in my previous post it would not make sense in that example to say ‘a lot has happened’, because the writer follows this with ‘It’s time to write them down’. ‘Them’ must be referring to the same antecedent in the preceding context as ‘a lot’ refers to.

    In the second case, ‘a lot has happened’ would change the meaning and remove what the author intended.

    • #20

    I think it’s becoming clear now. So ‘a lot’ used alone without the ‘of’ phrase is principally singular, unless the prior context sets it otherwise. Thanks!

    Well, this is actually what Keith Bradford has already said in post #14. Somehow I didn’t realize what that post actually meant but now I know. :D

    Last edited: Mar 27, 2013

    Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Why don t you use the dictionary to look the word toxic
  • Why does the author use or drop the definite article before the word bed
  • Why do we use a with word time
  • Why do we need to word
  • Why do we capitalize the word i