Where does the word britain come from

23 December 2017

Britain is an ancient name. Where does it come from?

What’s in a name?

Place names are more complex than they first appear. They can be geographical expressions which allow people to orient themselves physically and mentally in their surroundings. They can be mental ‘boxes’ that enable people to think about space and what happens within them or between them. Identity is bound up with place names and who is allowed to name what often shows how power is structured and negotiated between people, communities and identities. Creating place names can be collaborative, they can be a form of domination.

The history of the creation and use of the names of Britain, Scotland, Wales, Ireland and England reflect the nuanced meaning of names. This Briefing is part of a series that will explore all these shared and inextricably linked histories, changing terminologies and the still unresolved and politically charged question of what to call all ‘these islands’ together.

The Island of the Painted People?

The earliest recorded place names for the group of islands off the north east European coast are in the works of classical Greek and Roman authors. These islands were on the very far fringes of the known Mediterranean world; where the barbarians’ barbarians lived, a place of mist and mysteries; full of great potential wealth, fantastical creatures and strange peoples. Classical works of geography and history were meant to edify and entertain as much as they were there to inform.

The first report of islands in the far west which can be associated with Britain and Ireland are to be found in Herodotus, the Greek father of history, in the fifth century BCE. Herodotus wrote of islands known as the Cassiterides but of which he had no information beyond their name.Herodotus, The Histories, Bk3.115. Cassiterides translates as ‘Tin Islands from the Greek word for tin — kassiteros.

We owe the name of Britain to Pytheas of Massalia, a Greek explorer from present-day Marseille, who travelled to Britain in around 325BCE and recorded the local names of the places he visited. Unfortunately, Pytheas’s writings do not survive but they were widely used as a source by other ancient but desk-bound geographers such as the first-century BCE Greek author Diodorus Siculus who recorded one of the islands names as ‘Pretannike’.Diodorus Siculus, The Library of History, Bk5.21. Greek PrettanikeIn classical Greek and Latin texts, the ‘p’ often turned to a ‘b’ becoming ‘Britannia’.3 Julius Caesar is the earliest recorded writer to use the ‘b’ spelling during his own account of his expeditions to Britain in 55 and 54 BCE. Caesar, The Gallic Wars, Bk4.20-37; Bk5.2-24. These invasions were important propaganda exercises launched with the intention of further boosting Caesar’s prestige in Rome for subduing peoples on the very far edge of the known world. But the original Greek p-spelling was a rendition of a local Celtic name for either a people living on the island or for the land itself, exactly what is unclear. ‘Pretani’, from which it came from, was a Celtic word that most likely meant ‘the painted people’.4 The Celtic languages on these islands are split into two separate but related families: P-Celtic (Welsh, Cornish and Breton) & Q-Celtic (Irish, Scots Gaelic & Manx). Pretani comes from the P-Celtic line and its longevity can be seen in the modern Welsh word for Britain, Prydain. 

Mysterious Albion

‘Albion’ was another name recorded in the classical sources for the island we know as Britain. ‘Albion’ probably predates ‘Pretannia’. Indeed, ‘Albion’ may come from a ‘celticisation’ of a word used for these islands prior to the arrival of Celtic-speaking peoples and most likely derives from the Indo-European root word for hill or hilly, ‘alb-’ ‘albho-‘ for white, probably referring to the white chalk cliffs on Britain’s southern shore.Christopher A. Snyder, The Britons (Oxford, 2003), pp. 12-13. Other similarly derived place names include the Alps, Albania, and the Apennines, lending credence to the hill theory though it is not conclusive. Although Albion was often used by classical writers (and others since) as a rhetorical flourish, Britannia won out in general usage probably because after the beginning Roman conquest in 43CE, the province on the island was named ‘Britannia’.

Some examples of classical writers:

• Strabo (1st century BCE): “Brettanike” 6 Strabo, Geography, Bk1.4.3, Bk4.2.1; Bk.4.4.1. Brettanike. Strabo had a very low opinion of Pytheas, calling him an “archfalsifier” (pseudistatos).

• Pliny the Elder (1st century CE): “Britannia insula” Pliny the Elder, Natural History, Bk4.102. “Ex adverso huius situs Britannia insula clara Graecis nostrisque monimentis”

• Marcian of Heraclea (4th century CE): “the Prettanic Islands” Marcian of Heraclea, Periplus Maris Exteri, Bk1. Proeemium; Bk1.8, Bk2.Proeemium, Bk2.24, Bk2.27, Bk2.40, Bk2. 41-46. Hai Prettanikai nesoi.

What made Britain ‘Great’?

The word ‘Great’ becoming attached to ‘Britain’ comes from medieval practice and not the classical authors. This became a common practice in the twelfth century to distinguish the island of Britannia maior (Greater Britain) from Britannia minor (Lesser Britain), the other medieval Britain Brittany.9 David N. Dumville, ‘‘Celtic’ visions of England’ in Andrew Galloway (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Culture (Cambridge, 2011), p. 126.  Brittany gained its name from the British migrants who moved there in the post-Roman period.

Brutus of Troy and Britain

The twelfth century was a period of great historical introspection with numerous writers reflecting on the past of Britain and its various peoples’ pasts. The most influential contribution to this debate was Geoffrey of Monmouth, one of the most successful mytho-historians, with his History of the Kings of Britain.10 Geoffrey of Monmouth, The history of the kings of Britain: an edition and translation of De Gestis Britonum (Historia Regum Britanniae), M.D. Reeve (ed.) and N. Wright (trans.), (Woodbridge, 2007).  Geoffrey of Monmouth distinguished between Britannia Insula or Britannia meaning Britain and Britannia minor, lesser Britain for Brittany, 92.88, 96.235, 97.245  Alongside his famed contribution to what became Arthurian legend, Geoffrey provided a popular origin story  for the name ‘Britain’. Geoffrey wrote of a ‘Brutus of Troy’, a grandson of Aeneas, a Trojan hero and ancestor of the Roman people, who came to Albion, slew the giants who lived here and founded a kingdom, which took its name from him, Britain. Although this tale lacked any historical basis, this was the most popularly believed explanation until well into the sixteenth century at least.11 Barry Cunliffe, Britain Begins (Oxford, 2013), pp. 8-16.

From Geographical Expression to Political Reality

The accession of James VI of Scotland to the English and Irish thrones in 1603 created the impetus for widespread use of ‘Great Britain’ as both a geographical expression and as a political entity. England and Scotland remained separate kingdoms but James VI and (now) I decided that at least he could combine the two together in his title, so called himself ‘King of Great Britain’.12 James VI & I, ‘By the King. A proclamation concerning the Kings Majesties Stile, of King of Great Britaine, & C. [Westminster 20 October 1604]’ in J.F. Larkin & P.L Hughes (eds.), Stuart Royal Proclamations. Vol. 1, Royal proclamations of King James I, 1603-1625 (Oxford, 1973), no. 45; Jenny Wormald, ‘James VI and I (1566-1625)’, Oxford Dictionary of national biography (Oxford, 2004).  The use of ‘Great Britain’ to refer to the whole island of Britain, was strengthened by the Act of Union (1707), which created a new united ‘Kingdom of Great Britain’.13 Article I of the Act of Union (1707) The ‘Kingdom of Great Britain’ became the ‘United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland’ after the Act of Union (1801) between ‘Great Britain’ and the ‘Kingdom of Ireland’.14 First Article of the Union with Ireland Act (1800) As with many other states, a term that had enjoyed a largely literary, aspirational and geographic expression, now became a ‘political’ reality. After the Irish Free State’s creation in 1922, the name changed to the ‘United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’. This kept the distinction between what was geographically ‘Great Britain’ and ‘Northern Ireland’ but which remained one political union.

The ever-changing meaning of Britain

Britain may be an ancient name but its meaning has changed over time for the inhabitants and newcomers to these islands. This continuous renewal and reinterpretation of the meaning and understanding of the name is a major reason for its survival. The name of Britain has been a resource from which the various peoples have used to make and remake new, diverse and dynamic identities over centuries of lived history. It has survived because it has proved useful. However, this constant reuse of a name has preserved an ancient Celtic dialectal name transliterated by an ancient Greek explorer from the south of France over two millennia ago.

NOTES

  1. Herodotus, The Histories, Bk3.115. Cassiterides translates as ‘Tin Islands from the Greek word for tin — kassiteros.
     
  2. Diodorus Siculus, The Library of History, Bk5.21. Greek Prettanike.
     
  3. Julius Caesar is the earliest recorded writer to use the ‘b’ spelling during his own account of his expeditions to Britain in 55 and 54 BCE. Caesar, The Gallic Wars, Bk4.20-37; Bk5.2-24. These invasions were important propaganda exercises launched with the intention of further boosting Caesar’s prestige in Rome for subduing peoples on the very far edge of the known world.
     
  4. The Celtic languages on these islands are split into two separate but related families: P-Celtic (Welsh, Cornish and Breton) & Q-Celtic (Irish, Scots Gaelic & Manx). Pretani comes from the P-Celtic line and its longevity can be seen in the modern Welsh word for Britain, Prydain.
     
  5. Christopher A. Snyder, The Britons (Oxford, 2003), pp. 12-13.
     
  6. Strabo, Geography, Bk1.4.3, Bk4.2.1; Bk.4.4.1. Brettanike. Strabo had a very low opinion of Pytheas, calling him an “archfalsifier” (pseudistatos).
     
  7. Pliny the Elder, Natural History, Bk4.102. “Ex adverso huius situs Britannia insula clara Graecis nostrisque monimentis”
     
  8. Marcian of Heraclea, Periplus Maris Exteri, Bk1. Proeemium; Bk1.8, Bk2.Proeemium, Bk2.24, Bk2.27, Bk2.40, Bk2. 41-46. Hai Prettanikai nesoi.
     
  9. David N. Dumville, ‘‘Celtic’ visions of England’ in Andrew Galloway (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Culture (Cambridge, 2011), p. 126.
     
  10. Geoffrey of Monmouth, The history of the kings of Britain: an edition and translation of De Gestis Britonum (Historia Regum Britanniae), M.D. Reeve (ed.) and N. Wright (trans.), (Woodbridge, 2007).  Geoffrey of Monmouth distinguished between Britannia Insula or Britannia meaning Britain and Britannia minor, lesser Britain for Brittany, 92.88, 96.235, 97.245
     
  11. Barry Cunliffe, Britain Begins (Oxford, 2013), pp. 8-16.
     
  12. James VI & I, ‘By the King. A proclamation concerning the Kings Majesties Stile, of King of Great Britaine, & C. [Westminster 20 October 1604]’ in J.F. Larkin & P.L Hughes (eds.), Stuart Royal Proclamations. Vol. 1, Royal proclamations of King James I, 1603-1625 (Oxford, 1973), no. 45; Jenny Wormald, ‘James VI and I (1566-1625)’, Oxford Dictionary of national biography (Oxford, 2004).
     
  13. Article I of the Act of Union (1707)
     
  14. First Article of the Union with Ireland Act (1800)

Suggested Additional Reading

Linda Colley, Britons: forging the nation (rev. ed. London, 2009).

Linda Colley, Acts of Union and Disunion (London 2014).

Barry Cunliffe, The extraordinary voyage of Pytheas the Greek (London, 2002).

Barry Cunliffe, Britain Begins (Oxford, 2013).

Christopher A. Snyder, The Britons (Oxford, 2003).
 

Please log in to create your comment

«England» — this name became known in the 1707th century AD and is associated with the Germanic tribe of Angles, who, together with the Saxons in the XNUMXth-XNUMXth centuries, captured the islands of the Britons. Great Britain dates back to XNUMX from the unification of the English and Scottish kingdoms under the auspices of a single monarchy.
Comes from lat. Britannia (Brittania) «Britain», then from the ethnonym Britto «Britt», then from the Celtic.

What is included in the United Kingdom?

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, known for short as the United Kingdom or Great Britain, is made up of four «historic countries»: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

What is the difference between Britain and England?

The names Britain, Great Britain, the UK, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland mean the same thing. They call the country, which in Russian we most often call Great Britain or simply Britain. England is part of Great Britain, one of the four territories into which it is divided.

What is the full name of the UK?

The full official name of the country is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Territory — 242,495 thousand sq. km.

Where is the Lake District in the UK?

Lake District) is a mountainous region in the North-West of England, in the county of Cumbria. The territory of the historical and cultural region practically coincides with the Cumberland Mountains. The Lake District is included in the UNESCO World Heritage List. The region is famous for its picturesque mountain and lake landscapes.

Where did the Brits come from?

The first written mention of the Britons, as a separate people, is found in the Anglo-Saxon chronicles of the XNUMXth century, according to these texts, the Britons came from Armorica, a peninsula in France. … The first inhabitants of the island were Britons who came from Armorica. «

How many rivers are the longest in the UK?

Rivers of Great Britain

River Length in km
1 Severn 354
2 Thames 346
3 Trent 297
4 Great Ouse 230

What is the flag of Northern Ireland?

The flag consisted of the red cross of St. George (the flag of England) with a six-pointed star (according to the number of counties) superimposed on it, with images of a crown and a «red hand» (the historical symbol of Ulster). The image of the red hand marks Ulster’s connection to Northern Ireland.

Where did the Hanoverian dynasty come from on the English throne?

The House of Hanover was a dynasty of British kings from 1714 to 1901. A branch of the ancient Germanic family of Welfs, which ruled Braunschweig until the beginning of the 1837th century. Until XNUMX, the ruling dynasty (electors, and then kings) of Hanover, which was in personal union with Great Britain, was also the ruling dynasty.

Why Britain and not Great Britain?

Great Britain If you believe the maps of the world, then Great Britain is considered only one island from the entire totality of the British Isles. At the same time, he owns England, Scotland and Wales itself.

Why do England and Great Britain have different flags?

«Union Jack», as the flag of England is also called, is the state flag of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — the official name of the country. Since it includes England, Scotland and Ireland, therefore, the combination of stripes and colors should reflect these three states.

Who Really Governs Great Britain?

The United Kingdom is an abbreviated name that sounds like the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It consists of four countries: England (England), Scotland (Scotland), Wales (Wales) and Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland).

What are Whigs and Tories?

Whigs (English Whigs) — the old name of the British liberals and created by them in the 1780s. … the Whigs were considered the party of the commercial and industrial bourgeoisie, in contrast to the Tories — the party of the landed aristocracy. The Liberal Party of Great Britain was organized from the Whigs and Pilits in 1859.

When did the United Kingdom come to be called Great Britain?

On May 1, 1707, the Kingdom of Great Britain was created, created by the political union of the kingdoms of England and Scotland in accordance with the Treaty of Union of 1706, which was agreed in the previous year and ratified by the English and Scottish parliaments.

  • Add bookmark

  • #1

Hello. I have some etymological questions.

Have it ever occured to you where the most familiar words such as «England» and «Britain» came from?

We know that there are quite a few countries whose names are composed of two parts, the people(the race) and «land». For example, Poland is a land inhabited by Poles, Finland a land inhabited by Finns, Scotland inhabited by Scotts, and so on. But how about «England», does it mean a land inhabited by ….perhaps «Angles»? If that is the case, why do people omit the Saxons?

And how about «Britain»? How does it become the synonym of United Kingdom? Does it derive from «Briton», the celts who lived in nowdays southeastern england before they were conquered by the Romans? If so, why do people group all English, Scotland, Welsh into Britain, while in realiy it only composes only a part of all of them?

unmerged(6898)


  • Add bookmark

  • #2

Btw:
Angles were germanic tribe settled in eastern part of the island….
For some reason «Anglik» means Englishman and «Anglia» means England in Polish….
:eek:

Vandelay


  • Add bookmark

  • #3

But how about «England», does it mean a land inhabited by ….perhaps «Angles»? If that is the case, why do people omit the Saxons?

Yes, it means land of the Angles. I don´t know why the Saxons and Jutes were «excluded», but including them would have made for a very clumsy name… Perhaps the Angles became/ were dominant? Many other European countries are named after the founding tribe — France, Sweden, Denmark, Poland, Estonia etc.

And, yes, Britain comes from the tribe Britons via the Roman name for the province Britannia (which included Wales but not Scotland which the Romans IIRC called Caledonia).

/Vandelay

unmerged(8000)


  • Add bookmark

  • #4

Many people call Britain, England anyway, they forget UK or Britain.

Also I was recently watching a documentary on the Celts and was interested to find out that the «Celts» as the Romans called the tribes of gaul, never lived in the British isles. (the romans never called the British natives Celts…)

The spread of the celtic language was because of trade along the atlantic seaboard from northern spain along france and to Britain. Genetically the Welsh and Irish are relatively unrelated to other Europeans…

They are no Celts!

Dark Knight


  • Add bookmark

  • #5

Originally posted by Vonsson

Genetically the Welsh and Irish are relatively unrelated to other Europeans…

Do you have a source for this? If true, this would mean that the Scots and Bretons also aren’t really ‘Celts’. This despite the fact that all four groups have always been considered to be Celtic in cultural and linguistic terms as they certainly were in religious (the religion of the pre-Roman Britons was essentially the same as the Celtic peoples of Gaul).

Vandelay


  • Add bookmark

  • #6

IMO there´s no such thing as «real» Celts — if the Britons, Scots, Irish etc. were culturally and linguistically Celtic, and they were, then who cares about «blood» or genes??? People who do tend to like brown shirts and marching in unison…

In any case Dark Knight I think that some of the studies of Anglo-Saxon genes in England that were discussed earlier also mentioned genetic studies of «Celtic» areas of Britain.

Right now the number of samples taken in DNA and the methods of interpreting the results of DNA analysis are so new that I personally take all these (hyped by the media) DNA studies reported with more than a few grains of salt. At least when they deal on the «micro-scale» of ancient tribes.

Cheers,
Vandelay

unmerged(8000)


  • Add bookmark

  • #7

The BBC has a story on the difference between english and welsh.

The genetic map of British isles seemed to indicate that Scottish are not as colsely related to Welsh and Irish as one may have assumed and excepting scotland’s west coast, display much stronger links with English and Norwegians
ie: a largely Teutonic background.

The Celts as a genetic people can only be traced to parts of France, Spain, Switzerland and Austria.

Also I don’t think that being interested in ones genetic makeup is indicitive of ones political or cultural beliefs. The comments that only nazis would talk about genes smack of european political correctness.

Last edited: Jul 30, 2002

unmerged(2695)


  • Add bookmark

  • #8

Celt originated as the Greek term for the peoples of central and western Europe. The Byzantines (Anna Comnena) used Kelt interchangably with Frank, in essence as a derogatory term.

As the lands north of the Greek colony of Massilia was populated by «kelts» this term was used as a label for the languages spoken by the Gauls and Britons etc.

Celt is neither a tribal name nor an ethnic autoappellation.

PS.

Britain got its name after Brutus the Trojan who settled in the island 60 years after the fall of Troy…:)

Vandelay


  • Add bookmark

  • #9

Also I don’t think that being interested in ones genetic makeup is indicitive of ones political or cultural beliefs. The comments that only nazis would talk about genes smack of european political correctness.

Allow me to clarify my post:I´m very interested in genetic studies — what I question is whether genes «really» make you a member of an ethnic group or not. Were the Celtic speaking Britons any less Celtic than e.g. the Helvetii? I certainly think not.

To summarize: I find language and culture a much more determinant factor in ethnic grouping than genes. If that´s PC than so be it.

Cheers,
Vandelay

unmerged(2695)


  • Add bookmark

  • #10

Originally posted by Vandelay

Allow me to clarify my post:I´m very interested in genetic studies — what I question is whether genes «really» make you a member of an ethnic group or not. Were the Celtic speaking Britons any less Celtic than e.g. the Helvetii? I certainly think not.

In so far as they are both by retrospective definition Celts, no.

To summarize: I find language and culture a much more determinant factor in ethnic grouping than genes. If that´s PC than so be it.

Cheers,
Vandelay

Agreed.

But you must admit that the apparent genetic difference between Western Norwegians and Danes is an intrigueing bit of information.

Last edited: Jul 31, 2002

Vandelay


  • Add bookmark

  • #11

But you must admit that the apparent genetic difference between Western Norwegians and Danes is an intrigueing bit of information.

Yes, it is — I find these genetic studies very interesting if somewhat overhyped. So what is the difference between Western Norwegians and Danes then? And are Western Norwegians different from other Norwegians?

The close genetic ties between Icelandics and Irish mitochondrial DNA is also very interesting. Doesn´t change neither the Icelandic nor Irish ethnos, though…

Cheers,
Vandelay

unmerged(8000)


  • Add bookmark

  • #12

I’d love to see and Icelanders face when he hears that he is more closely related to an Irish slave than a «mighty viking warrior»:p

unmerged(2695)


  • Add bookmark

  • #13

Vandelay,
the BBC/UCL only tested western Norwegians. They actually made the test in Bergen, the one place in Vestlandet with an historically high rate of immigration from the south and east

Last edited: Jul 31, 2002

Solmyr


  • Add bookmark

  • #14

Originally posted by Vandelay

Yes, it means land of the Angles. I don´t know why the Saxons and Jutes were «excluded», but including them would have made for a very clumsy name…

Because Jutland already exists elsewhere, and Sexland would be… let’s just say, not very British in character. :D

Originally posted by Vandelay

Perhaps the Angles became/ were dominant? Many other European countries are named after the founding tribe — France, Sweden, Denmark, Poland, Estonia etc.

I’m pretty sure that Saxons were the dominant tribe (Wessex), at least until the Norman invasion. The fact that Angles inhabited the region of London might have something to do with it, but I’m not sure.

As for Britain, according to mythology, it was named after Brutus, a Trojan refugee who wrested the island (until then called Albion) from the Giants. See here for details.

King

King

Part Time Game Designer


  • Add bookmark

  • #15

The Saxons are represented by the counties of Essex, Wessex, Sussex. East West and South Saxons respectively. The angles get East Anglia as one of their places. Apart from that I don’t know why they Angles one the race to name the country.

unmerged(234)


  • Add bookmark

  • #16

Maybe the Angels the first of the three germanic tribes?

As Solmyr writes the Saxon was the most dominant, but that may only have been in the later part.

stnylan


  • Add bookmark

  • #17

My guess is that ‘English’ was the Latin term in the 7th century for the inhabitants of old Roman Britain, and came into use in England with the conversion to Christianity in the south. I have no evidence for that, but is seems likely.

As for Celts, there is a problem here that there were several different sorts of Celts. As far as language goes Welsh, Cornish and Breton belong to one group, and Gaelic (Scots and Irish) belong to another. (They are called P- and Q- Celtic, but I can never remember which way around they are.) For what I can recall current theory is that the pre-Roman inhabitants of Roman Britain were a different group of Celts from those in Caledonia and Hibernia (or their leaders were. The group was called the Belgae, it originated sometime in the 2nd century bc in the rough vicinity of modern day Belguim. They migrated over to Britain c.100BC.

In Scotland the genetics are especially complicated because there are four main genetic groups. The Picts, who no one really knows about. The Britons, mostly in the south-west, remnants of the old Romano-British kingdom of Strathclyde. Irish Celtic from the migrations which led to Dalriada. And finally Norse from the 8th-10th century migrations and colonisations, mostly in the Isles, north and north-east.

unmerged(234)


  • Add bookmark

  • #18

Originally posted by stnylan
My guess is that ‘English’ was the Latin term in the 7th century for the inhabitants of old Roman Britain, and came into use in England with the conversion to Christianity in the south. I have no evidence for that, but is seems likely….

No, I am quite sure that english are from the name on the invading Angles. But have no reall idé why.

Styrbiorn


  • Add bookmark

  • #19

Because Jutland already exists elsewhere, and Sexland would be… let’s just say, not very British in character.

That would be «Saxland» and it already existed, North-Western Germany was known under that name. :)

FYI, «Britain» comes from the latin «Brittonem» which came from a Celtic name of the Celtic inhabitants of Britain. It was revived by James I in 1604, when he declared himself king of Great Britain.

All the English names for nationalities/countries mentioned here derives from the old local name of the population/founders, with one exception — Finland. Finland in Finnish is Suomi, but «finnr» (Finn) and thus «Finland» was the Old Norse and Swedish name for the land, which was adopted by English.

Styrbiorn


  • Add bookmark

  • #20

Originally posted by Janbalk

No, I am quite sure that english are from the name on the invading Angles. But have no reall idé why.

True. England comes from the Old Germanic name for «land of the Angles» (and «Englisk» meaning Anglic). The term actually applied to all Germanic invaders — the Angles, Saxons and Jutes (actually it also applied to the _language_ group, therefore the Saxons and Jutes were counted in).

Нужно срочно !!!!!
Вот текст :

Great Britain

The history of Great Britain

In prehistoric times Britain was a part of the continent.The first people came there over dry land.The present English Channel which separates Britain from Europe appeared at the end of the Ice Age.

The first inhabitants of the island came from the Iberian peninsula where Spain is located after 3000BC.After 2000BC people from the east of Europe entered the country.The two peoples intermixed.

After 800BC the Celts arrived from Central Europe.The name “Britain” comes from the name of a Celtic tribe known as the Britons.

In 55BC Julius Caesar, the Roman ruler, invaded Britain.The Celts fought well.He left the country.

In 54BC he invaded the country with a larger army.The Celts were defeated.He made the Celts pay a regular tribute to Rome.In AD43 the country was conquered by the Romans.The Romans built many towns and connected them by good roads.The largest of the towns was called Londinium.The town was build on the River Thames.The occupation continued till the beginning of the 5th century (AD410).

By the end of the 5 th century the greater part of the country was occupied by Germanic tribes: the Jutes, the Saxons and Angles.In 829 the greater part of the country was united under the name England.The Northern part was called Scotland.In the 11 th century a united Scottish kingdom was formed.

In 1066 William the Conqueror and his people came to England from Normandy in France.The French language became the official language of the ruling class for the next three centuries.England began to spread its power on Wales, Scotland and Ireland.

In 1603 the son of Mary Queen of Scots James Stuart became James I of England.The unification of Scotland and England took place in 1707.They formed a single parliament in London.The country became known as Great Britain.

The adoption of Christianity in England took place in 664.In the 16 th century Henry VIII of England quarreled with Rome and declared himself head of the Anglican Church, which was a Protestant Church.The Irish people were divided into two religious groups: Catholics and Protestants.

Henry VIII tried to force Irish Catholics to become Anglican.After a long struggle the southern part of Ireland remained part of the UK.

But even now there are problems there connected with religion.
Вот вопросы:
Answer the questions: 1. How did the first people come to Britain? 2. When did the English Channel appear? 3. When did the Celts arrive to Britain? 4. Where did the name «Britain» come from? 5. When did Julius Caesar invade Britain? 6. What did the Romans build in Britain? 7. How long did the occupation by the Romans continue? 8. What was the largest of the towns called? 9. What tribes occ

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Where does the word blog come from
  • When was the word of wisdom
  • Where does the word automobile come from текст с заданиями
  • When was microsoft excel created
  • When using the word yet