When do you use the word was or were

Both was and were are correct forms of the verb “to be.” However, when to use was vs. were depends on whether you’re talking about something imaginary or something real.

Hypothetical situations need the subjunctive mood, so you should use were regardless of the speaker’s point of view. However, situations that actually happened in the past need the indicative mood. This means subject-verb agreement comes into play, so you should use was with I/he/she (She was here) but were with you/we/they (You/we/they were here).

When to Use Was vs. Were at a Glance:

Should you use was or were? This is a grammar question that even native English speakers struggle to answer correctly. Let’s look at the easiest way to know the difference between was and were. What’s more, you’ll see was vs. were example sentences and learn how to correctly use this irregular verb.

Indicative Mood: Past tense of the verb “to be”	I was	you were	he was	she was	it was	we were	you were	they were
Subjunctive Mood: Hypothetical situations with the verb “to be”	I were	you were	he were	she were	it were	we were	you were	they were

In this way, the difference between was and were comes down to describing something that actually happened in the past vs. an imaginary situation that never happened at all. Moreover, it also depends on who is speaking. Finally, subject-verb agreement also comes into play.

3 Easy Steps That Tell you When to use Was vs. Were

1. Ask yourself these questions:

• Did it really occur in the past?
• Or, are we talking about an imaginary situation that can’t be real?

2. If it actually occurred in the past:

Use was with the first and third person singular points of view:

• I was
• She was
• He was
• It was
• You were

But, use were with the second person (you) or third person (they) plural points of view. This helps ensure correct subject-verb agreement.

• You were
• They were

3. If the situation is imaginary and can’t be real:

Were is the only correct option. As such, use were for every point of view.

Why Second Conditional Uses Were?

A second conditional, or type 2 conditional sentence, describes hypothetical or imaginary situations, like dreams and wishes. In some instances, those situations could happen in the future, but they most likely won’t.

Below is the structure for a second conditional statement:

If + verb to be + condition

In the statement above, we used “were” instead of “was.” That’s even if the latter is considered the proper past simple form of the verb to be to go with the pronoun “I.”

We do this because we’re talking about an imaginary situation. No one can reverse time and be a child again, right? That’s just impossible. By saying “If I were,” we’re changing the mood of the verb to be from indicative to subjunctive.

The indicative mood describes real situations or facts. On the other hand, the subjunctive mood describes situations that are hypothetical or are not real. For second conditional statements, we always use were.

“Was” Usually Refers to the Past

When you see the word “was,” we’re most likely talking about something that previously occurred.

Specifically, was indicates that the first and third singular person points of view acted in the past. For this reason, we use was with the indicative mood.

In other words, the rule for was/were typically comes down to singular vs. plural when using the past tense of the verb “to be.”

However, as with most grammatical rules in English, there is an exception here.

Which is Correct: “If I Was” or “If I Were”

Most statements that include if are subjunctive. In these cases, we use were. Notwithstanding, there is one exception for the first person point of view: I.

On one side, we have was in the indicative mood to indicate reality.

On the other, we have were in the subjunctive mood to refer to imaginary or hypothetical situations.

But, there is also a third option in the middle: what should you use when you aren’t sure if something is real or imaginary?

In this case, “If I was” is the grammatically correct choice. In other words, when it’s not clear if something is real or hypothetical, “I was” is correct.

In the above example, the speaker isn’t sure if they made a mistake or not. This situation might be imaginary, but it might also be real. As a result, the speaker can’t use were since this option is for purely imaginary situations.

Therefore, we use “If I was” to show this doubt grammatically.

Now, let’s compare the “If I was vs. were” in action:

The above example expresses a purely imaginary situation: I don’t live in Los Angeles, so I don’t drive to work. I show that the scenario isn’t real by using the verb “to be” with the subjunctive mood were.

Conversely, the above example expresses doubt. For instance, I did live in Los Angeles in the past, but I don’t anymore. Additionally, I used to drive, but I don’t anymore.

If I don’t remember exactly when I moved or when I stopped driving, I should use the if I was construction to express this doubt to my audience.

When “Were” is Past Tense and When it’s Subjunctive

Was tends to hang out exclusively with the past tense in the indicative mood. However, were can express the real past tense in the indicative mood or an imaginary situation in the subjunctive mood. How do you tell the difference?

Were and Past Tense

The trick here is to associate were and the past tense with subject-verb agreement. In other words, whether you should use was vs. were depends on who is speaking.

For example, use was with these points of view:

• First person singular = I was
• Third person singular = he/she/it was

However, use were with these points of view:

• Second person singular = you were
• Second person plural = you (all) were
• First person plural = wewere
• Third person plural = theywere

Should I use Was or Were with There?

Whether to use was or were with therehas to do with subject-verb agreement. When a sentence starts with the word there, the words following the verb are typically the subject. For example, in the sentence “There are oranges on the table,” the subject is oranges. If the subject is singular, then you should use the verb was (“There was an orange…“). Yet, if the subject is plural, then the correct verb to use is were (“There were oranges…“).

Were and the Subjunctive Mood

Subjunctive what? Unless you’re a diehard grammarian or advanced polyglot, you’ve probably never heard of subjunctive mood. In simple terms, the phrase describes a verb tense we associate with unreal statements or questions.

Essentially, whereas most statements reveal something that is currently happening or has previously happened, a subjunctive sentence refers to something that hasn’t actually happened. That may be a want, a wish, or a suggestion.

In both written and spoken English, subjunctive mood usually appears by an indicative verb such aswant, wish, desire, suggest, or recommend. What’s more, sentences that express possibilities often include the word if.

When creating a subjunctive mood, the traditional singular/plural rules for was/were don’t apply. In fact, when it comes to the subjunctive mood, there’s an easy rule for choosing was or were: always choose were.

You’ll note that none of these examples describes a current reality. Instead, they all describe hypothetical, desired, or imaginary situations. Therefore, we use were regardless of whether the subject is singular or plural to make this departure from reality clear.

Which is Correct Grammatically: If I Was or If I Were?

Both of the phrases if I was and if I were are grammatically correct, but they mean very different things. Therefore, the difference between if I was and if I weredepends on what you are trying to say. First, use if I was for something that might be real, or to express doubt when you’re not sure if something is true (If I was late responding to you, I apologize). Second, use if I were to express something unreal, imaginary, or hypothetical (If I were a dragon…”

Often, the word if introduces subjunctive mood. When a sentence includes the phrase if I was orif I were, grammatists tend to label this subjunctive mood. That means the sentence refers to something that goes against, or is contrary to, the current truth. In other words, the sentence may express a desire, wish, possibility, or hypothetical situation. For subjunctive statements or questions, the grammatically correct phrase is “If I were“.

Was and Were Sentence Examples

Here are examples of was vs. were in a sentence:

Can you say if I Were?

You can say if I were. In fact, were is typically the correct conjugation of the verb to be in this context. Because this phrase begins with the word if, it’s subjunctive mood. That’s another way of saying it describes a hypothetical or unreal situation. In subjunctive sentences, the correct form of to be is always were.

Is If I Were a Boy Grammatically Correct?

If I were a boy is grammatically correct. This construction is correct because it reflects subjunctive mood. In other words, the phrase refers to a hypothetical or unreal situation. In this particular hypothetical, the writer is speculating about what might happen if her gender were different. When you write a sentence using subjunctive mood, you should always conjugate the the verb “to be” as were— regardless of the speaker’s point of view.

Were vs. Was: a Matter of Style?

It’s also worth noting that more and more writers are opting to use was instead of were in subjunctive sentences. This is particularly true in informal prose. It’s led some grammarians to speculate about the subjunctive were eventually becoming obsolete.

A Brief Was/Were Recap

By following a few basic rules, understanding when to use was and were doesn’t have to leave you with a headache.

1. When conjugating the verb to be in the past tense, use was when writing in first or third person singular. Use were when writing in second person singular or plural or first-person or third-person plural.
2. Use were when crafting sentences that involve hypothetical situations, speculation, or wishes. This is known as subjunctive mood and is often identified by the inclusion of the word if.
3. If a sentence starts with the word there, use was if the subject is singular. Use were if the subject is plural.

Practice Your Grammar Skills With These Was and Were Exercises

Read More: 🛣️ Toward Vs. Towards: An Easy Guide On When To Use Which

Правильное употребление глагола to be — камень преткновения в изучении английского языка. В частности, затруднения возникают при выборе прошедших форм глагола «быть» — was и were. Они используются и как самостоятельные глаголы, и в составе разных конструкций. Разберем все возможные случаи употребления was и were и узнаем, как выбрать нужную форму.

Was и were как прошедшая форма глагола быть (to be)

Was и were в качестве прошедших форм глагола to be для Past Simple используются в значении «был», «находился». В этом разделе мы рассмотрим, когда и как нужно употреблять эти формы.

Когда was, а когда — were?

Чтобы понять, какую форму выбрать в конкретном случае, необходимо посмотреть на подлежащее. Если оно выражено существительным в единственном числе или местоимениями I, he, she или it, то was — верная форма. А если подлежащее стоит во множественном числе или представляет собой местоимения you, we или they, то выбрать нужно were.

Стоит отметить одну особенность английского языка: местоимение you согласуется с глаголами только в форме множественного числа. Это значит, что в настоящем времени глагол to be превращается в are, а в прошедшем, соответственно, в were:

• You are an engineer. — Ты инженер.
• You were an engineer. — Ты был инженером.

Случаи употребления was и were

Самые частые случаи употребления was и were — описание качеств, профессий, местонахождения в прошедшем времени:

• That evening was amazing. — Тот вечер был замечательным.
• His sister was a singer. — Его сестра была певицей.
• My books were on the table. — Мои книги были на столе.

Was и were в отрицательных предложениях

Для отрицания нужно просто добавить частицу not после глагола:

• Jane’s father was not in the office. — Отец Джейн не был в офисе.
• The animals were not sick. — Животные не были больны.

Часто используют сокращенную форму глагола, соединяя его с частицей not апострофом (надстрочной запятой):

• I wasn’t hungry. — Я не был голоден.
• My friends weren’t at the party three days ago. — Мои друзья были на вечеринке 3 дня назад.

Was и were в вопросительных предложениях и коротких ответах

Образование вопросов с was и were отличается от стандартных предложений в Past Simple. Обычно вопросительное предложение в этом времени выглядит так:

• Did you go to school yesterday? — Ты ходил в школу вчера?

Вспомогательный глагол did стоит на первом месте. Однако если нужно составить вопрос с to be в прошедшей форме, то was или were играют роль вспомогательного глагола и выносятся в начало предложения:

• Were you at school yesterday? — Ты был вчера в школе?

Короткий ответ на такой вопрос строится по схеме: Yes (no), subject (подлежащее) + was/were (not). Рассмотрим на примере:

• Were they in Moscow last year? — Были ли они в Москве в прошлом году?
• Yes, they were. — Да, были.
• No, they were not (weren’t) — Нет, не были.

Was и were в устойчивых выражениях с глаголом to be

Существует множество устойчивых выражений с глаголом to be. Чаще всего используются:

• to be interested in — интересоваться;
• to be good at–быть способным к чему-либо;
• to be glad– радоваться;
• to be in a hurry — спешить;
• to be famous for — известный чем-либо;
• to be fond of — любить;
• to be familiar with — хорошо знать что-либо;
• to be afraid of — бояться чего-либо;
• to be busy with — быть занятым чем-либо;
• to be upset about — быть расстроенным чем-либо.

Для образования предложений с этими словосочетаниями в прошедшем времени глагол to be превращается в was или were. Форма зависит от лица и числа подлежащего:

• All my students were good at foreign languages. — Все мои студенты были способны к иностранным языкам.
• I wasn’t afraid of darkness in my childhood. — В детстве я не боялся темноты.
• What was this city famous for? — Чем был известен этот город?

Формы there was / there were

Грамматический оборот there was / there were используется в тех же случаях, что и there is / there are, только в прошедшем времени. Мы употребляем эту конструкцию для описания места, указания факта существования чего-либо:

• There were 2 apples and 5 oranges on the table. — На столе было 2 яблока и 5 апельсинов.
• There was a beautiful picture on the wall. — На стене была красивая картина.

There was используется, если следующее за ним существительное — неисчисляемое (water, sugar, bread) или стоит в единственном числе, а there were — если существительное во множественном числе.

В вопросительных предложения слова конструкции меняются местами:

• Were there any carpets in the flat? — В квартире были ковры?

Также можно добавлять вопросительные слова how much / how many, what:

• How many carpets were there in the flat? — Сколько было ковров в квартире?
• What was there in the cupboard? — Что было в шкафу?

Was / were как вспомогательный глагол в Past Continuous

Past Continuous обозначает событие или процесс, которое длилось в определенный момент в прошлом. Для образования этого времени понадобятся was (для единственного числа) или were (для множественного числа) и причастие с окончанием -ing. Рассмотрим на примерах утвердительное, отрицательное и вопросительное предложения:

• You were cooking spaghetti at 5 o’clock yesterday. — Ты готовил спагетти вчера в 5 часов.
• You weren’t cooking spaghetti at 5 o’clock yesterday. — Ты не готовил спагетти вчера в 5 часов.
• Were you cooking spaghetti at 5 o’clock yesterday? — Ты готовил вчера спагетти в 5 часов?

Was / were и пассивный залог

Существует 2 вида залога — активный (active voice) и пассивный (passive voice). Различие между ними заключается в том, как происходит действие. В первом случае подлежащее выполняет действие:

• They visited the library. — Они посетили библиотеку.

Во втором случае — в пассивном залоге — действие осуществляется над подлежащим:

• The library was visited. — Библиотеку посетили.

Пассивная конструкция образуется так: was / were + причастие прошедшего времени (Participle II). Форма глагола to be зависит от лица и числа подлежащего:

• The pupils were asked to bring new exercise-books. — Учеников попросили принести новые тетради.
• I wasn’t invited to the party. — Меня не пригласили на вечеринку.
• When was the castle built? — Когда замок был построен?

Модальный глагол to be to в прошедшем времени

Модальный глагол to be to выражает обязанность или необходимость. На русский язык эта конструкция может переводиться как «должен», «обязан», «договорились». А форма was/were + to + Simple Infinitive говорит о том, что что-то должно было произойти, но мы не знаем, произошло ли на самом деле. Рассмотрим на примере:

• They were to prepare the documents. — Они должны были подготовить документы.

Также эта конструкция может выражать строгий запрет:

• Kate was not to go there. — Кейт не должна была туда идти.

Употребление was/were в условных предложениях

Прошедшая форма глагола to be используется во втором типе условных предложений (Second Conditional). Они описывают нереальные или воображаемые ситуации в настоящем или будущем времени. В условной части такого предложения (после if) ставится глагол в Past Simple, а во второй части, где указывается следствие, используются would и инфинитив смыслового глагола:

• If I were you, I would call her. — На твоем месте я бы ей позвонил.
• If Olga were not offended, she would visit us. — Если бы Ольга не была обижена, она бы пришла к нам.

Здесь важно отметить, что в условии глагол to be принимает только форму were, независимо от того, в каком числе и лице стоит подлежащее.

В конструкции «I wish…»

Грамматическая конструкция wish + were переводится как «жаль, что../» или «хотел бы../».

• I wish my company were more successful. — Я хотел бы, чтобы моя компания была более успешной.
• I wish I were 16 years old. — Жаль, что мне не 16 лет.

В этой конструкции всегда ставится форма were,  даже если подлежащее представлено единственным числом.

С местоимениями each/none и неисчисляемыми существительными

Все существительные делятся на исчисляемые (countable) и неисчисляемые (uncountable). Различать их просто: к исчисляемым относятся объекты, которые можно посчитать (ручка — ручки, книга — книги, дерево — деревья), тогда как неисчисляемые существительные не поддаются счету (вода, мука, воздух).

С неисчисляемыми существительными используется was:

• The water was very warm. — Вода была очень теплой.
• Sugar was in the box. — Сахар был коробке.

Что касается местоимений each и none, с ними также употребляется форма was:

• Each of the participants was ready to read a report. — Каждый из участников был готов прочитать доклад.
• None of us was happy to hear that. — Никто из нас не был рад услышать это.

Важно: в предложениях с none не нужно ставить дополнительно частицу not после глагола, так как это местоимение уже обозначает отрицание.

Выбор верной прошедшей формы глагола to be зависит от конкретного предложения. В большинстве случаев глагол согласуется с подлежащим: для единственного числа употребляется was, для множественного — were.

Was and were are both past tenses of the verb to be. The verb be is a tricky one because it is an irregular verb and one that we find ourselves using with great frequency, so it is that much more important that we choose the correct verb for our sentences.

In this post, I want to go over the grammar behind was vs. were, when it’s correct to use which one, and give you a few tips to keep track of them both. After reading this post, you shouldn’t have any trouble correctly choosing between was or were in your future writing.

Forms of Was and Were

As I said above, was and were are in the past tense, but they are used differently.

Was is used in the first person singular (I) and the third person singular (he, she, it).

Were is used in the second person singular and plural (you, your, yours) and first and third person plural (we, they).

The forms that was and were will take in your sentence are summarized in the chart below,

Singular = I was, You were, He was, She was, It was

Plural = We were, You were, They were

• I was driving to the park.
• You were drinking some water.
• He was about to eat dinner.
• She was at the roller rink.
• It was a great time.
• We were in the right spot.
• They were nowhere to be seen.

If I was vs. If I were

While some people get mixed up on what we’ve covered above, most of the confusion with these two words centers on the use of the subjunctive mood and specifically the two phrases if I was vs. if I were. For example, which of the following two choices is correct?

• If I was a better cook, I could entertain more.

-or-

• If I were a better cook, I could entertain more.

You hear people say both each and every day, so it’s hard to know which is correct. The answer, however, has to do with the subjunctive mood.

Subjunctive Mood

The subjunctive mood is a verb form that is used for unreal or hypothetical statements. It is made up of the phrases I were, he were, she were, it were, etc. You often use this form when you are being wishful. For example,

• I wish I weren’t so shy.
• I wish it were warmer outside.
• If I were taller, I could dunk a basketball.
• If John were a rich man, he could drive a fancy car.
• He acts as if he were the one in charge.
• John spends money as if he were a millionaire.

All of the above sentences use the verb were because they aren’t true; they do not describe reality.

In the first two sentences, I am talking about things I wish would happen.

In the third and fourth sentences, I am talking about situations that would happen if I were taller and if John were rich, speaking hypothetically.

And the fifth and sixth sentences are examples of unreal statements.

When to Use Were

Another good example of the subjunctive mood can be found in the musical Fiddler on the Roof. In the song, “If I were a rich man,” the character Tevye sings about how different his life would be and all the things he would do if he were rich.

If I were a rich man, I’d build a big tall house…

If I were a rich man, I’d have the time that I lack.

If I were a wealthy man, I wouldn’t have to work hard.

In these lines, Tevye is fantasizing about life as a wealthy man. He isn’t rich now; he’s just imagining it, so we need to use the subjective “If I were,” not “If I was.”

The correct answer for the example above, therefore, is, “If I were a better cook, I could entertain more.”

Tricks to Remember

Two good clues for the subjunctive mood are the words if and wish. If you see either of these words, there is a good chance you will need to use the subjunctive.

When to Use Was

Since were is used for statements that do not describe reality, was is just the opposite. Was is used for statements of fact. For example,

• Last night, I was watching TV until midnight.
• When I was younger, I wanted to be a singer.
• Your brother was my college roommate.

Summary

These words are used differently in sentences, so it’s important to know when to use were vs. was.

Was is used in the first and third person singular past. It is used for statements of fact.

Were is used in the second person singular and plural and first and third person plural. It is used in the subjunctive mood to indicate unreal or hypothetical statements. The words if and wish usually indicate the subjunctive mood.

< Where versus Were versus Wear

Was versus Were >