Proper Usage of «That» in English
Updated on November 26, 2019
The word ‘that’ is a common word in English that is used in many different ways. Did you notice the use of ‘that’ in the previous sentence? In this case, ‘that’ was used as a relative pronoun as a complement. Often ‘that’ can be used or left out of a sentence entirely. For example, many English students know (that) you can leave out ‘that,’ depending on the instance. This guide to the use of ‘that’ will help you understand when to use the word, as well as when it’s okay to leave it out.
‘That’ as a Determiner
‘That’ is used as a determiner at the beginning of sentences to indicate one object which is far from the speaker. Note that the plural form of ‘that’ as a determiner is ‘those.’ ‘That’ and ‘those’ is generally used with ‘there’ to indicate that the object(s) is not close to the speaker.
Examples
- That’s my friend Tom over there.
- That’s a pencil you have in your hand.
- Those paintings are by Cezanne.
- That is my house on the corner of the street.
‘That’ as a Relative Pronoun
‘That’ can be used as a relative pronoun to connect two clauses. In this case, ‘that’ can also be substituted by ‘who’ or ‘which.’
Examples: That = Which
Tom bought the apples that the man was selling.
OR
Tom bought the apples which the man was selling.
Examples: That = Who
Peter invited the boy that was new in class.
OR
Peter invited the boy who was new in class.
‘That’ in a Clause as an Object
‘That’ can be used in clauses that act as the object of a verb.
Examples
- Jennifer hinted that she would be late for class.
- Doug knew that he needed to hurry up.
- The teacher suggested that we finish our homework.
‘That’ in a Clause as a Complement to a Noun or an Adjective
‘That’ can be used in a clause following a noun or an adjective as a complement. A complement helps give additional information about the noun or adjective. It answers the question ‘why.’
Examples
- Peter is upset that his sister wants to drop out of high school.
- Mr. Johnson appreciates our efforts that have brought in a lot of donations.
- She is certain that her son will be accepted to Harvard.
‘That’ Clause as Subject of a Sentence
‘That’ clauses can introduce a phrase acting as the subject of a sentence. This use of ‘that’ clauses is somewhat formal and is not common in everyday speech.
Examples
- That it is so difficult is hard to understand.
- That Mary feels so sad is very upsetting.
- That our teacher expects us to do two hours of homework every day is crazy!
The Fact That …
Related to the use of ‘that’ clauses as a subject is the more common phrase «The fact that…» to introduce a sentence. While both forms are correct, it is much more common to begin a sentence with the phrase «The fact that….»
Examples
- The fact that he wants to see you should make you happy.
- The fact that unemployment is still high proves what a difficult economy this is.
- The fact that Tom passed the test shows how much he has improved.
Compound Conjunctions with ‘That’
There are a number of compound conjunctions (words that connect) with ‘that.’ These expressions tend to be used in formal English and include:
«in order that,» «so that,» «providing that,» «in case that,» «now that,» «given that»
Examples
- He purchased the computer so that he might improve his typing.
- Susan told him she would marry him providing that he found a job.
- Alice feels happy now that she has moved into a new home.
After Reporting Verbs
‘That’ can be dropped after reporting verbs such as say (that), tell someone (that), regret (that), imply (that), etc.
Examples
- Jennifer said (that) she was in a hurry.
- Jack told me (that) he wanted to move to New York.
- The boss implied (that) the company was doing very well.
After Adjectives
Some adjectives can be followed by ‘that’ when answering the question ‘why.’ ‘That’ can be dropped after the adjective.
- I’m happy (that) you found a new job.
- She’s sad (that) he’s going to move to New York.
- Jack is anxious (that) he didn’t pass the test.
As Object in Relative Clauses
It’s common to drop ‘that’ when it is the object of the relative clause it introduces.
- He invited the boy (that) he met on the train.
- Shelly purchased the chair (that) she had seen at the auction.
- Alfred wants to read the book (that) Jane recommended.
I am adding to what StoneyB said in answer to the question, «When can I remove the word “that” in a sentence?» I was asking the same question myself, about when to or not to use «that.» The sentences I was unsure of using were «I am sorry that I did not call you,» or «I am sorry I did not call you.»
While reading StoneyB’s response, I was having a hard time absorbing to «parts of speech» terminology. I never did well with that in high school — my solution was to verbalize the sentence in my mind and if it sounded correct, I went with it! This method may work okay for those who have heard and spoken Americanized English for a long time, but is not the best advice for the English Language Learner.
All I have done is to add some of my own personal examples and maybe clarify the parts of speech that StoneyB discussed in his post. I stand to be corrected by anyone, please.
Knowing when or when not to use the word «that» in a sentence when you feel that you use it too often:
Example 1 — «that» — relative pronoun:
«It’s the same meatloaf that (used as a relative pronoun) we had yesterday.»
You can leave out the «that» in the sentence above because «it acts as the direct object of the verb in the relative clause» (StoneyB, 2014).
Direct object of the verb? — Leave it out.
«It’s the same meatloaf we had yesterday.» — Correct.
However, if it is used as the »subject of the verb in the relative clause» (StoneyB, 2014), you could not leave it out:
«It’s the same meatloaf that (subject) won (verb) in the cook-off.»
Subject of the verb? — Leave it in.
«It’s the same meatloaf ___ won in the cook-off.» — Not correct.
Example 2 — «that» — subordinating conjunction:
«I am sorry that (used as a subordinator) I did not call you.»
That appears in front of the subordinate clause and behind the verb (am), in the main clause.
«I am sorry I did not call you.»
Both uses are fine.
Example 3 — «that» — subject of the sentence:
If «that» is the subject of the sentence, it cannot be left out:
«That I am inconsiderate is a matter to be discussed later.» — Correct.
Example 4 — «that» — conjunction which does not appear and is not spoken close to the main verb in the sentence:
When the verb in the main clause is separated from the subordinate clause by a lot of other words, such as those used as part of an adverbial phrase, the that must remain for clarity in writing. In spoken English, it may be okay to leave it out, but it sounds a bit lazy to me.
Formal writing: «I am sorry in so, so, very many ways that (still used as a conjunction) I did not call you.» — Correct.
Spoken English: «I am sorry in so, so, very many ways I did not call you.» — Okay, but awkward.
Example 5 — «that» — predicative complement used with a verb:
Without the predicative complement, the sentence would not tell us much — for example, «Many folks thought,» does not stand well on its own, giving very little information about what was thought.
«Many folks thought that my meatloaf was better.» — Correct.
«Many folks thought my meatloaf was better.» — Okay in speech, but not so good in writing.
Sources:
English Language Learners Stack Exchange, (2014). When can I remove the word «that» in a sentence? — asked by T2E on May 26, 2013. Answered by StoneyB on May 27, 2013, edited March 7, 2014.
Englishpage, (2015). Forum thread: English Language Questions: Predicative Complement. Asked by Camilus, Member, April 17, 2004. Answered by Pete, Super Moderator, April 19, 2004.
http://www.englishpage.net/showthread.php?655-Predicative-Complement
For a few years during elementary school, virtually every sentence my friends and I uttered included the word “like.” This awful speech habit led to plenty of well-deserved ridicule, which made me determined to stop overusing unnecessary words. I thought I was succeeding on this front for years, until I started doing freelance writing assignments for a client who wasn’t a fan of superfluous words, including “that.” Then, I learned just how guilty I was of overusing the word “that” in my writing. It was basically my new, written version of “like.”
While phasing out “like” was pretty simple, removing unnecessary uses of “that” from my writing proved challenging because this word legitimately belongs in many sentences. To help you avoid similar grief, today I’d like to share a few tips for avoiding overusing “that” and using “that” in a sentence correctly.
When to Use ‘That’ in a Sentence
First, it’s important to know when “that” is really needed in a sentence. This word frequently attaches dependent clauses to independent clauses, and it is strictly necessary if a clause begins with certain subordinating conjunctions, such as before, while and in addition to. “That” also should be used before clauses that clarify a noun.
- She said that although the sunrise workout sounded like a brilliant idea, sleeping in also sounded good.
- The notion that their project would be finished by the original deadline was laughable.
“That” additionally should appear after certain verbs, such as contend, estimate and point out. If you’re a native speaker, you can probably intuitively identify many of these verbs.
- He enthusiastically declared that he would stop procrastinating tomorrow.
You also should use “that” if a sentence would sound awkward without it. If you’re in doubt, include it, since this does less harm than incorrectly omitting it.
When to Leave Out ‘That’
To decide whether you can omit “that” from a sentence, check how naturally and intelligibly the sentence reads without it. Usually, you can drop “that” if it follows a verb that essentially means “to say.” This omission mimics natural speech and shouldn’t change the meaning of the sentence.
- The children claimed an ice cream break would help them study more effectively.
- She insisted she wasn’t responsible for the houseplant’s untimely death.
However, it’s usually better to keep “that” if other words fall between the verb and the dependent clause.
- The kids also said this morning that a television break would enhance their studying.
- She admitted begrudgingly that she might have contributed to the plant’s demise.
You also can usually omit “that” if it precedes a simple relative clause.
- Neither of them was particularly excited about the compromise (that) they reached.
Using ‘That’ Twice in a Row
When you’re trimming unnecessary uses of “that” from your writing, be sure to pay attention to sentences where it appears multiple times or even twice in a row (“that that”). These sentences can be grammatically correct but stylistically undesirable. For example, at BKA, we use Associated Press Style, which requires sentences to be constructed in a manner that eliminates consecutive uses of “that.”
- He confessed that that plan had been formulated on three hours of sleep.
- He confessed that they had only slept three hours when they formulated that plan.
Even if you’re not following a strict style guide, it’s often beneficial to try revising sentences to avoid using “that” too redundantly.
Using ‘That’ or ‘Which’
It can be tempting to cut back on “that” by replacing it with “which,” but these words aren’t actually interchangeable. “That” introduces information that is integral to the meaning of a sentence, while “which” precedes information that is non-essential and offset by commas.
- The first kindergarten class that all 31 students attended was miraculously free of mishaps.
- The first kindergarten class, which all 31 students attended, was miraculously free of mishaps.
In this example, each sentence has a distinct meaning. The first describes a specific class when all 31 students were present for the first time, while in the second, the attendance of all 31 kids is a non-essential detail.
Got All That?
Striking the right balance between overusing the word “that” and omitting it improperly takes a little thought, but with practice, it should become second nature. What other common words do people overuse? Tell us about it in the comments section! If you’re looking for help on grammar rules, check out some of our other GrammarSpot posts.
-
#2
Hi, Sally.
You can drop «that» when it introduces or works as the direct object, but you can’t do it if it works as the subject of the verb.
I thought (that) I was too shy
In this case, «I» is the subject of «thought», while «that» is a conjunction that introduces a subordinate clause that works as the direct object of the verb.
You can drop «that».
The car (that) I bought is red
In this sentence, we have a relative clause in which «I» is the subject of «bought», and «that» is a relative pronoun that is the direct object of bought. Therefore, you can drop it too.
The car that is parked outside is red.
In this case, there is another relative clause, but «that» works as the subject of «is», so you can’t drop it.
Regards
In today’s usage which and that are both used to introduce restrictive clauses, those which cannot be removed from the context of the sentence, and which is also used to introduce nonrestrictive clauses, those which provide additional information but can be removed without the sentence falling apart. These rules are actually older than the words themselves, which were frequently interchangeable until the 18th century.
Do you suffer from low self-esteem? Do you have anxiety, or difficulty making decisions? Do you find yourself unable to decide whether you should use that or which when composing a sentence? In the event that you answered “yes” to either of the first two questions you have our sympathies, but as a dictionary we can offer little else. However, if the source of your trouble is the issue of that and which we may be of some small assistance.
Use ‘which’ or ‘that’ to introduce a restrictive clause, and ‘which’ to introduce a nonrestrictive clause.
Restrictive and Unrestrictive Clauses
Before we begin, you should be warned that it’s time to put your grammar pants on, since we’re about to dive into the world of restrictive and nonrestrictive clauses. (If you don’t know what grammar pants are, they are itchy woolen slacks that are too tight, and magically make you mildly dissatisfied with the choices of everyone around you.)
Once upon a time, long ago, when the English language was still basking in its Edenic youth, that and which were freely interchanged. Everyone was very happy.
Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesars; and unto God the things which are Gods.
—Joseph Hall, A Plaine and Familiar Explication, 1633Render therefore unto Caesar, the things that are Caesars; and unto God, the things that are Gods.
—Robert Grosse, Royalty and Loyalty, 1647Render therefore unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things which are God’s.
—Samuel Sturmy, The Mariners Magazine, 1669Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesars: and unto God the things that are Gods.
—Richard Hollingworth, An Exercitation Concerning Usurped Powers, 1650
The careful reader may have noticed that in the four examples given above, all published within a span of four decades, each of the authors writes what is essentially the same sentence, but uses that and which in a manner that is different from each of the others. The mid-17th century was apparently a period of syntactical free love. Then the rules on restrictive and nonrestrictive clauses came along.
If you are not a copy editor, or someone who is deeply interested in grammar, you may have forgotten what restrictive and nonrestrictive clauses are. A restrictive clause is a part of a sentence that may not be removed without rendering that sentence incomplete, difficult to understand, or with its meaning substantially changed. “The essay that covers grammar is very boring” contains a restrictive clause (“that covers grammar”) that is important in making the sentence understood. “The essay that covers grammar, which I read while I was supposed to be working, is very boring,” contains the same restrictive clause, but also has a nonrestrictive clause (“which I read while I was supposed to be working”). This nonrestrictive clause adds information to the sentence, but it is not imperative to include it.
If you would prefer a sartorial analogy, the nonrestrictive clause functions like a silk scarf; you may wish to wear one when leaving the house, but your day won’t really be affected if you decide to leave it at home. The restrictive clause, however, is more akin to pants; your day will have a decidedly problematic tone if you leave home without them.
That underwent a period of decline at the end of the 17th century, then made a comeback several decades later. When it reappeared, that was used for nonrestrictive clauses much less frequently than it had previously been (although some writers, such as Thackeray and Tennyson, still used it in this way quite often).
Rules for ‘Which’ and ‘That’
Soon, grammarians tried to establish a set of rules to govern the use of these words. As is so often the case when a grammatical rule is established based on the preference of usage writers, rather than actual usage, there was a great deal of disagreement as to what the rules should actually be. In 1906 the Fowler brothers (Henry Watson and Francis George) published The King’s English, and came up with a firm set of guidelines which were adopted by many subsequent usage guides (the Fowlers used the terms defining and non-defining instead of restrictive and nonrestrictive).
That should never be used to introduce a non-defining clause.
…Which should not be used in defining clauses except when custom, euphony, or convenience is decidedly against the use of that.
—Fowler, F.G. & H.W., The King’s English, 1906
There are some problems with these rules. The main one is that they don’t really work. Some twenty years after the brothers first issued them, Henry Watson wrote another book on usage. He plaintively expressed his feelings on the way that people were treating that and which:
…if writers would agree to regard that as the defining relative pronoun, & which as the non-defining, there would be much gain both in lucidity & in ease. Some there are who follow this principle now; but it would be idle to pretend that it is the practice either of most or of the best writers.
—H. W. Fowler, A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 1926
It has been pointed out that if most of your language’s writers do not follow a rule (and the best writers seem to disregard it as well) then you may have to accept that it’s not much of a rule. Another issue with the Fowler’s dicta is that if you say that your rule can be ignored for reasons of “custom, euphony, or convenience”, it would appear to be more of a mild suggestion than a rule.
It is true that that is rarely found today used in nonrestrictive clauses (although poets still use it thusly), but which seems to have a fair degree of flexibility to it, and can perform very nicely in restrictive clauses, nonrestrictive clauses, and in annoying people who feel that it should never be found outside of a nonrestrictive clause. Here is what our own usage guide, the Merriam-Webster Dictionary of English Usage, has to say on the matter:
We conclude that at the end of the 20th century, the usage of which and that—at least in prose—has pretty much settled down. You can use either which or that to introduce a restrictive clause—the grounds for your choice should be stylistic—and which to introduce a nonrestrictive clause.
Another way of looking at this is that if your clause is bracketed by commas (“the article on grammar, which I started while eating lunch, seemed to never end”) it is likely a nonrestrictive clause, and you can give it a which. If it is not surrounded by commas, then it is most likely a restrictive clause, and you can choose to give it a that or a which. If anyone questions your decision, you can say that you are following the advice of the Fowlers, and are making a decision based on custom, euphony, and convenience.
-
#1
I’ve noticed that I use the world «that» a lot in my writing (lol). Can someone explain to me when it is appropriate and when it is not?
Here are some examples. . .
«But as the months passed with little progress, Stitt and Carlson paid Howland a visit where it became apparent to them that nothing was being done.»
«According to Bovasso’s write up, Shilling told him that Loretta only gave Carmean general information, but that she was comfortable enough that she would be willing to talk with him again«Carmean told him previously that they were conducting a «super-sensitive» investigation»«Carmean told Carlson that Police Chief Robert Wadman had come to their. . . «
Thank you,
Matt
Last edited by a moderator: Mar 24, 2015
Download Article
Download Article
It can be hard to know when to use “which” and when to use “that” in a sentence, even if you are a native English speaker. Knowing the difference between a restrictive and non-restrictive clause and when and how to use them can help you learn how to use “which” and “that” correctly.
-
1
Determine what a restrictive clause is. The key to knowing if you need to use “which” or “that” in a sentence is deciding if you need to create a restrictive or non-restrictive clause.
- A restrictive clause is one that sets limits on the subject of the sentence. A restrictive clause also contributes to the meaning of the sentence – the sentence won’t make sense without the restrictive clause.
- For example, the sentence “I like flowers that are purple” has a restrictive clause in it and removing it would change the meaning of the sentence. “That are purple” is the restrictive clause, because without it you would just be telling people that you like flowers in general.[1]
-
2
Determine what a non-restrictive clause is. A non-restrictive clause adds information to the sentence, but removing it doesn’t change the meaning of the sentence. These are usually separated by commas before and after the clause. They may also be distinguished by dashes or parentheses.
- For example, the sentence, “The car, which is red, was totaled in the accident,” has a non-restrictive clause in it because “which is red” can be removed without changing the sentence’s meaning. The car will still be totaled, whether we know its color or not. “Which is red” is the non-restrictive clause.[2]
Advertisement
- For example, the sentence, “The car, which is red, was totaled in the accident,” has a non-restrictive clause in it because “which is red” can be removed without changing the sentence’s meaning. The car will still be totaled, whether we know its color or not. “Which is red” is the non-restrictive clause.[2]
-
3
Determine if you’re using a restrictive or non-restrictive clause. When you’re trying to figure out if you’re using a restrictive or non-restrictive clause, ask yourself if the clause changes the meaning of the sentence or if it just adds information to it.
- If taking out the clause changes the meaning of the sentence, you’re using a restrictive clause. In the sentence «Jimmy likes apples that are red» taking out «that are red» changes the meaning of the sentence; we might think Jimmy likes all apples and not just the red ones. «That are red» is, therefore, a restrictive clause.
- If taking out the clause doesn’t change the meaning of the sentence, you’re using a non-restrictive clause.[3]
In the sentence «Jimmy thinks apples, which grow on trees in his yard, are the best fruit,» taking out «which grow on trees in his yard» doesn’t change the meaning of the sentence. We still learn that apples are Jimmy’s favorite fruit, and therefore «which grow on trees in his yard» is a non-restrictive clause.
Advertisement
-
1
Use “that” for restrictive clauses. If you determine that omitting the clause changes the meaning of the sentence, you need to use “that” in your sentence.[4]
- For example, in the sentence “I like dogs that are brown,” the clause “that are brown” is crucial to understanding the sentence; it limits what type of dogs you like.
-
2
Use “which” for non-restrictive clauses. If omitting the clause only removes additional information from the sentence, you need to use “which” in your sentence.
- For example, in the sentence “I took the firetruck, which is my niece’s favorite toy, to be fixed,” the clause “which is my niece’s favorite toy” only adds information to the sentence. You’re taking the firetruck to be fixed – the fact that the truck is your niece’s favorite doesn’t change the meaning of the sentence.[5]
- For example, in the sentence “I took the firetruck, which is my niece’s favorite toy, to be fixed,” the clause “which is my niece’s favorite toy” only adds information to the sentence. You’re taking the firetruck to be fixed – the fact that the truck is your niece’s favorite doesn’t change the meaning of the sentence.[5]
-
3
Determine where you should place commas. If you’re creating a non-restrictive clause and therefore using “which” in your sentence, the clause should usually be surrounded by commas. In some cases, though, you may also use dashes or parentheses to separate a non-restrictive clause.
- For example, “I love lobster, which is expensive, because it reminds me of growing up by the ocean,” would still have the same meaning without “which is expensive.” Therefore, «which is expensive» is the phrase you should surround with commas.
- If you know you have a non-restrictive clause and need to use “which,” but don’t know where to put the commas, test it. Your sentence should still make sense if you take out the words surrounded by commas.[6]
Advertisement
Add New Question
-
Question
How is «which» used in a question?
«Which» is used in a question when you are referring choices or options. Some examples would be «Which flower do you like?» «Which song do you want to play?» «Which store are we going to?»
-
Question
How do I use «should» and «must» correctly?
«Should» is a suggestion; «must» is an insistence, usually used when something is imperative.
-
Question
«I was sorry that I could not to go to class.» Is this sentence correct?
Almost. «…that I could not go to class.»
See more answers
Ask a Question
200 characters left
Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered.
Submit
Advertisement
Video
References
About This Article
Article SummaryX
To use “that” and “which” correctly, determine if the clause in question would change the meaning of the sentence if it were removed. If it does change the meaning of the sentence, use “that.” For example, in the sentence, “I like flowers that are red,” you’d use “that” because if you removed the phrase, “that are red,” the meaning of the sentence would change. Alternatively, if the phrase is just adding information to the sentence, as in, “That car, which is red, is mine,” you’d use “which” because removing the phrase, “which is red,” wouldn’t change the meaning. For tips on how to place commas around these types of phrases, read on!
Did this summary help you?
Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 120,620 times.
Reader Success Stories
-
«I’ve wondered about which and that usage, and your example with pictures fits perfectly for remembering the…» more
Did this article help you?
Proper use
In the English language there are words and related rules that are used in speech so often that we stop noticing them. One such case is the use of «That».
As we all know, the word That can perform various functions as part of a sentence — not only its translation into Russian depends on this, but also what part of speech it belongs to. In this article we will consider and analyze all known use cases. That.
Defining word or determine
So, That can perform the function defining word or determine in English. In this case That translated into Russian as this, this, this, that, that and that.
As a rule, the word is placed at the beginning of a sentence and indicates an object that is far from the speaker. It is important to remember that plural from That — Those.
In addition, quite often the word «that» or «those» is used in a sentence in conjunction with there.
For example:
That is my boss Jason over there. — This is my leader is over there.
Those photos are by Annie Leibovitz. — These photographs taken by Annie Leibovitz.
That is Daniel’s car in the end of the street. — This is Daniel’s car at the end of the street.
Relative pronoun or aboutpronoun
That It can also be used as a relative pronoun to connect two simple sentences in a complex or to indicate an object. Being a pronoun, That пis translated into Russian as this, this who or which the. In some sentences That can be replaced with who or which.
For example:
That task looks difficult. — This the task seems daunting.
What is That in the box? — What it in the box?
Kate bought the car That her neighbor was selling. — Kate bought a car, that sold her neighbor (in this case, that can be replaced by which).
Jason knows the guy That was attending the conference. — Jason knows the guy который attended a conference (in this case that can be replaced with who).
As a pronoun That can also be used in a number of set expressions. Among them:
- That‘sit — exactly, right, that’s all.For example: You have to send the application form directly to the embassy. That‘sit. — You must send the questionnaire directly to the embassy. That’s it.
- That‘sThat — at this point, for example: I will never sign this agreement and
Частьsubordinate clauseпредложенияorin a clause as an object or a compliment
We often use That as a combination of the main and subordinate clauses. In such cases, the word can act as an object in relation to a verb or an addition to a noun or adjective.
For example:
Kate knew That she would be nervous during her speech. — Kate knew that will be worried during the performance.
Olga hinted That they were going to buy a new house. — Olga hinted, that they are going to buy a new home.
Denis thought That his decision was right. — Denis believed that his decision was correct.
At the beginning of a sentence or assubjectofasentence
That can be used at the beginning of a sentence. However, it is worth remembering that such constructions are more natural in formal communication, they are rarely found in everyday speech.
For example:
That Jessica expects us to do everything for her is crazy. — Thatthat Jessica expects us to do everything for her is silly.
That
Source: https://www.wallstreetenglish.ru/blog/pravilnoye-ispolzovaniye-that-v-angliyskom/
When that, which, who (whom and whose) is used: relative pronoun rules, example use — SPEAK ENGLISH
In English, you can find a number of pronouns that can not only replace nouns, but serve to combine two sentences into one — the main and and the subordinate clause. First of all, we mean the English pronouns who, which and that. These pronouns are usually called connective or relative. Often this group includes whom.
We will consider each word, give general recommendations on the use of one or another English pronoun in accordance with the rules of grammar and analyze their use in practice.
To begin with, it should be understood that Relative Pronouns and Conjunctive Pronouns are different groups.
I have a friend who can draw well. — I have a friend who draws great./ That is, we find out what kind of friend this is — a good drawing.
Do you know, who wrote this book? — Do you know who wrote this book?/ Here the pronoun combines two sentences and does not define anyone.
Although they can be expressed with the same words and even have the same translation into Russian, these pronouns serve different functions in a sentence. The main purpose of our article is to help you in choosing the right word, and not to give a classification of pronouns. Based on this, we will tell you about the features of each word, regardless of their group.
Each of the presented pronouns can be translated from English “what”, “which”. Pronouns are NOT interchangeable. We will talk about the reasons further.
English pronoun Who
This pronoun can only be used in relation to a person. Remember, in English it is not enough to be an animate noun like a cat or a horse. Many grammatical rules related to pronouns divide nouns into the category “person” — “not human”.
This is a song about a man who sold the world. — This is a song about a man who sold the world.
Let’s find out who killed who. — Let’s find out who killed whom.
Since the word performing the function of the subject presupposes exactly a person, a person, we use the pronoun ‘who’.
This pronoun has a case form ‘whom‘- “which”, “which”. This word in an English sentence expresses an addition in the subordinate clause:
Do you remember whom did you tell about it? — Do you remember who you told about it?
However, many linguists and philologists regard this form as bookish. In colloquial speech, it is most often replaced by ‘that’.
English pronoun Which
The pronoun ‘which’ is also translated “which”, “which”, but unlike the previous word, it can only be used in relation to inanimate objects and animals, that is, to “not people”.
Sally dodn’t remember which way to go. Sally didn’t remember which road to take.
It is generally accepted that the pronoun ‘which’ is a more bookish version of ‘that’, which can be found more often in colloquial speech. However, these words may not always substitute for each other. ‘That’ will never be used as a subject in a subordinate clause:
Tell me, which car is yours? — Tell me, which car is yours?
This is an important point to pay attention to. The pronoun ‘that’, which will be discussed now, very often replaces ‘who’ or ‘which’ in speech, if they are relative.
BUT ‘that’ is never used as a connecting pronoun.
English pronoun That
So, we have decided that this English pronoun is relative. Its beauty lies in the fact that it can replace almost any relative pronoun, regardless of which noun it is assigned to — animate or inanimate, be it a person or an animal:
When are which, that and who are used
In this article, we will look at the cases when it is used which, and when — That, what is the difference in use. We will also touch on the use of who in relative clauses in English.
Sometimes which and that are used interchangeably:
What’s the name of the river which / that goes through the town? — What is the name of the river that flows through the city?
The same goes for that and who (when it comes to people):
What’s the name of the man who / that lives next door? — What is the name of the man who lives next door?
Who и which used in more formal situations.
But the use also depends on the type of the subordinate clause. If you don’t know what it is, the next paragraph will refresh your memory a bit.
What is a relative clause
In simple words, subordinate clauses add information to the main one. In Russian, they are usually separated from the main sentence by a comma. They can often be discarded without losing their meaning.
When we deal with relative pronouns that, which и who, here it is necessary to consider the relative clauses.
Defining / identifying clause
Also called restrictive.
Such proposals clarify who or what exactly we are talking about. Throwing them out will affect the meaning of the whole sentence.
In definitive sentences, it is more common to use THAT (but which can also be used). If we are talking about people, it is also used who.
The woman who / that visited me in the hospital was very kind. “The woman who visited me in the hospital was very kind. (If you leave «the woman was very kind» — it is not clear who we are talking about).
The umbrella that / which I bought last week is already broken. — The umbrella I bought last week is already broken. (Without a clause, it turns out «The umbrella has already broken» — which umbrella?)
As you may have noticed, in such cases, we do not use commas.
Non-defining clause
Also called non-restrictive.
Such sentences add information that can be thrown out of the sentence without losing substance. That is, they provide information that is not required to be mentioned.
Such sentences use WHICH… When referring to people, it is used who.
Elephants, which are the largest land mammals, live in herds of 10 or more adults. — Elephants, the largest terrestrial mammals, live in herds of 10 or more adults. (About the largest mammals — rather, an optional encyclopedic clarification).
The author, who graduated from the same university I did, gave a wonderful presentation. — The author, who graduated from the same university as me, gave a wonderful presentation. (Here the speaker simply notes that the author studied at the same institution with him. You can also add «by the way»).
Also, if we are talking about belonging, you can use the pronoun who (whose):
The farmer, whose name was Fred, sold us 10 pounds of potatoes. “A farmer whose name was Fred (whose name was Fred) sold us 10 pounds of potatoes. (Again, the information about his name is not important, the point is that he sold us the potatoes).
Non-definitive subordinate clauses are separated by commas.
That in indefinite sentences NOT used by:
The area, which has very high unemployment, is in the north of the country.
The area, which has very high unemployment, is in the north of the country.
If the rule seemed a little vague and incomprehensible to you, let’s look at a couple more examples to compare the relative clauses after which и That.
The car that he bought is very expensive. “The car he bought is very expensive. (The clause contains important information — we are talking specifically about the car he bought).
He bought a car, which is very expensive. — He bought a car, which is very expensive. (Here it is important for us to say that he bought a car. Information that it is expensive is not so important.)
I hope you now understand how which differs from that and how to use them correctly in a sentence. If you have any questions, ask them in the comments.
Finally, I suggest you do the exercises as a quiz to help you practice the lesson.
Rule of using who which
Who (or Whom) is a pronoun, and is used by the speaker as a subject or object of a verb to indicate which person is being discussed, or to enter any additional information about the person just mentioned. This pronoun can only be used in relation to animate persons.
Which is a pronoun, and is used by the speaker as a subject or object of a verb to indicate what thing or things are being discussed, or to enter any additional information about the thing just mentioned. This pronoun can only be used in relation to inanimate objects.
That is a pronoun, and is used by the speaker as a subject or object of a verb to indicate which person or thing is being discussed, or to enter any additional information about the person or thing just mentioned. This pronoun can be used in relation to both animate persons and inanimate ones.
All of these pronouns can be omitted in some cases (see relative pronouns for details).
For example:
the girl who was hungry.
Girl, которая was hungry.
the boy whom I talked to.
Boy, s which I was talking.
The dog That wagged its tail.
Dog, который wagged his tail.
The softwareThat) I wrote.
Software, which I wrote.
the company, which / That hired me.
Company, которая hired me.
Interrogative pronouns.
1. Interrogative pronouns are relative pronouns ( what, who, whom, which, who ), are only used in a complex declarative clause to connect a main clause with a clause.
Syntactic function of relative pronouns (what, who, whom, which, whose). At the same time, within the subordinate clause, these pronouns perform an independent syntactic function (subject, addition, definition).
The woman, who is from London, speaks Irish.
The woman who is from London speaks Irish (subject).
Doesn’t always say what he thinks.
He always says what he thinks (addition).
That is the doll which I bought for my daughter.
This is a doll that I bought for my daughter (added).
Using that instead of the relative pronouns what, who, whom, which, whose in the subordinate clause.
Instead of the relative pronouns what, who, whom, which, whose in the relative clause, a relative pronoun can be used That — which, in relation to both an animate and an inanimate object (But: after the comma and the prepositions that are not used) These are the tables which they bought 2 weeks ago.
These are the tables they bought two weeks ago.
Consuming Whose. 2. Whose, as a relative pronoun, is used with both inanimate and animate objects and stands directly before the nouns to which the pronoun refers.
Do they happen to call the young women who names are Jill and Jim Peterson?
Have you ever called the young women named Jill and the Jim Petersons?
The mountains who
Source: https://ekaterina-alexeeva.ru/nachinayushhim/kogda-ispolzuetsya-that-which-who-whom-i-whose-pravilo-upotrebleniya-otnositelnyh-mestoimenij-primer-ispolzovaniya.html
Clauses and relative pronouns
In this article we will talk about the types of subordinate clauses, as well as learn what relative pronouns are in English and how to use them when constructing complex sentences.
In English, as in Russian, sentences can be simple or complex. Complex sentences are divided into compound sentences and complex sentences.
All parts of compound sentences are equal to each other, and compound sentences consist of a principal clause and one or more subordinate clauses.
In this article we will talk about the different types of subordinate clauses, as well as about relative pronouns, which are necessary to link subordinate clauses with the main one.
The main clause and the subordinate clause are unequal — the subordinate clause always depends on the main clause and cannot exist independently. Subordinate clauses do not have a specific place in a sentence — they can come before, after or in the middle of the main sentence:
Do you know the man who offered us a discount? — You know the man who offered us a discount?
When I come home, I will call you. — When I will come home, I’ll call you.
dress, which you asked me for, is dirty. — The dress, which you asked me, dirty.
The relative clauses in English perform the function of one of the members of the sentence:
- subject clauses
- predicative clauses
- object clauses
- adverbial clauses
- attributive clauses
Now let’s talk about each of the types of subordinate clauses in more detail.
Such clauses perform the function of a subject and answer the questions who? (who?) and what? (what?). Sentences are entered using the following words: that (what), whether (whether), if (whether), who (who, who), whom (whom, to whom), whose (whose), what (what, which), which (which), when (when), where (where), how (how), why (why).
What i need is your full attention. — What I need Is your full attention.
Whether he comes or not is not important anymore. — Will he come or not — it doesn’t matter anymore.
2. Predicative clauses
They stand in the place of the predicate after the verb to be (to be). They are connected to the main clause with the same words as the subordinate subjects: that (what), whether (whether), if (whether), who (who, who), whom (whom, to whom), whose (whose), what ( what, what, etc.). Unlike subordinate subjects, predicate clauses always appear in the second part of a complex sentence.
Please note that the verb to be (to be), which acts as a linking verb between the main and subordinate clauses in Russian, is translated as «to consist in that (that)», «in that (that)».
The problem was that we got lost and had nobody to ask for directions… — The problem was that we were lost and we had no one to ask for directions.
The question is if he can get his car fixed by Monday… — The question is, will his car be repaired by monday.
that is why I couldn’t tell you the truth… — Here why couldn’t I tell you the truth.
3. Additional clauses
They serve as a complement and answer the questions what? (what?), about what? (about what?), what for? (for what?) and other questions of indirect cases. The sentences are introduced with the same words as the subject and predicate clauses.
I didn’t know where my husband was… — I did not know, where was my husband.
He convinced me that it was a very bad idea… — He convinced me that it was a very bad idea.
My colleagues hope that we will not have to go on strike… — My colleagues hope that we don’t have to go on strike.
4. Subordinate clauses
Such clauses act as circumstances and answer the questions when? (when?), why? (why?), where? (where?, where?) and how? (how?). This group of subordinate clauses is divided into subgroups by value. Let’s examine each of the subgroups in turn:
- The adverbial clauses of time answer the questions when? (when?), since when? (since when?), how long? (how long?). The subordinate clause is introduced into the sentence with a union that is somehow related to the designation of time: when (when), while (while), as (when, while), after (after), before (before ), till / until (until, until), as soon as (once), since (since) or by the time (by the time).While you were at the hospital, your boss called three times. — While you were in the hospital, your boss called three times. He moved to Chicago when he was 25 years old… — He moved to Chicago, when he was 25 years oldPlease note that in the subordinate clause of time, if we are talking about a future action, you cannot use will. Instead, we use the present tense — Present Simple, Present Continuous or Present Perfect.As soon as I find a new job, I’ll pay you back. — As soon as I find a new job, I will return your money. Please, close the window before you leave for work… — Please close the window before, how will you leave for work.
- The adverbial clauses of place answer the questions where? (where?, where?) and where from? (where?). The clause is joined to the main clause using the union where (where, where), wherever (wherever, wherever), anywhere (anywhere) or everywhere (everywhere). wherever you want… — You can go, wherever you want… Can you tell me where I can park my car? — Could you tell me, where can i park my car?
- The adverbial clauses of reason answer the question why? (why?). The main clause and the subordinate clause are combined with the conjunction because (because), as (because), since (because), for (because) or seeing that (because). I didn’t climb the tree because I am afraid of height… — I did not climb a tree, because I’m afraid of height.Since she doesn’t want to help me, I will have to do everything myself. — Since she doesn’t want to help me, I will have to do everything myself.
- Adverbial clauses of the investigation Adverbial clauses of the investigation (the adverbial clauses of result) — the main clause describes the reason, the clause indicates the effect, they are connected by the union so that (so that) or such that (such that) .It was such a hard day that I fell the asleep moment I got into bed… — It was such a hard day, that I fell asleep, as soon as I went to bed… He spoke so quietly that no one could hear him… — He said so quiet, that no one heard him.
- The adverbial clauses of manner and comparison — the subordinate clause is attached to the main clause using the conjunction as if (as if), as though (as if), as (as ), than, as as (the same as) or so as (such as). as if you have been working a lot recently! — You seem, as if worked a lot lately! Today it is not as cold as it was yesterday… — Today not so cold, how was it yesterday.
- The adverbial clauses of concession — although / though (although), no matter what (whatever), whatever (whatever), whoever (whoever), however (whatever), whatever (whatever), even though (whatever).whatever happens, I will be there for you. — Whatever happensyou can count on me.Though we live in different countries, we still remain close friends. — Although we live in different countries, we are still close friends.
Source: https://englex.ru/subordinate-clauses/
Who, which or that? Relative Clauses in english
What are these sentences with the interrogative words who and which in the middle?
Those parts of the sentence that start with question words are called “relative clauses”. Their function is to identify or provide additional information about nouns or pronouns that are mentioned in the main part of the sentence.
The words who, which, where, whose, which we mistake for interrogative words, in this case have the role of pronouns and are called: relative pronouns;
who (whom) refers to people;
which refers to things, objects;
whose we use when talking about belonging;
Do you know the man who lives next door? — Do you know the person who lives in the next house? My friend Jane, whom I visited last year, lives in London. — My friend Jane, whom I visited last year, lives in London. Those who want to buy tickets should pay in advance. — Those who want to buy tickets must pay in advance. The new book by Stephen King, which I have just read, impressed me. — The new book by Stephen King that I just read impressed me.
My sister, whose husband is British, speaks English very well. — My sister, who has a British husband (who is married to a British), speaks good English.
At first glance, everything is simple, isn’t it? There are nouns and pronouns. There is more information about them.
But let’s look at the examples again: why do some sentences in English have commas and others do not?
To understand this and other issues related to the use of relative clauses, you need to know what two types of relative clauses are and understand the difference between them.
Two types of Relative Clauses
Top questions related to Relative Clauses:
- How can you tell if a comma is being put?
- How to choose the correct relative pronoun: who / which or that?
- When can relative pronoun be omitted from a sentence?
Let’s start with a comma. Why are there problems with her?
The fact is that in Russian, Ukrainian and other languages, we always put a comma in front of the part of the sentence that begins with the words which, which, which and the like.
And in English, before putting a comma, you need to figure out what function this part (relative clause) performs in the whole sentence.
Unfortunately, not everyone understands and clearly explains the difference between the two types of relative clauses, which is why there are so many mistakes in written work and in speech.
Let’s take a look at the differences and features of these types.
1. Defining Relative Clauses (Identifying Relative Clauses)
The meaning of the verb to define — to define, define, characterize; constitute a distinctive property. Defining Relative Clause — a part of a sentence that characterizes a noun or pronoun (subject or complement of the main sentence), gives important information, without which the essence will not be clear.
For example:
I met the woman who lives next door. — I met a woman who lives in a neighboring apartment.
This is the watch which my father gave me for my Birthday. — This is the watch that my dad gave me for my birthday.
If we remove the second part from these examples — everything after who and which, then the incomprehensible will remain:
I met the woman.
This is the watch.
The definite article the indicates something definite, but at the same time there is no definition, and our interlocutor will certainly have questions: “What kind of woman? What clock? What are we talking about? » To make it clear what exactly you are talking about, you need Defining Relative Clauses, which provide the necessary information and define nouns.
If we are dealing with Defining Relative Clauses, then who and which can be replaced with that, especially in informal speech:
I met the woman who / that lives next door. — I met a woman who lives in a neighboring apartment.
This is the watch which / that my father gave me for my Birthday. — This is the watch that my dad gave me for my birthday.
Now about the reason for the absence of commas.
We have found out that Defining Relative Clauses cannot be removed from a sentence without losing its meaning. Without this part, the proposal will be irrelevant and will raise additional clarifying questions. Defining relative clauses no need to separate with commas, because they — integral part of the offer.
Another way to remember, which I suggest to my students, sounds like this: if there is that, no comma:
Do you know the man who / that lives next door? — Do you know the person who lives in the next house?
I movies which / that have a happy ending. — I love films that have a happy ending.
In a speech, Defining Relative Clauses not highlighted by pauses.
Non-defining Relative Clauses (Non-identifying Relative Clauses)
Their main difference from Defining Relative Clauses is that they bring to the proposal not important, but additional information about the subject or object, which does not in any way affect the main meaning of the sentence, since the subject or object has already been identified:
My friend Jane, who lives in London, got a new job. — My friend Jane, who lives in London, got a new job.
The new book by Stephen King, which I have just read, impressed me. — The new book by Stephen King that I just read impressed me.
In the first sentence, it was quite possible to do without specifying where the friend lives. In the second, there is no information that I have just read the book.
We need commas in Non-defining Relative Clauses in order to show optional information in a sentence… The commas say: «You can throw this part out of the sentence, since without it the rest of the sentence has adequate meaning.»
If desired, the speaker can present additional information in a separate simple sentence.
However, Non-defining Relative Clauses serve to enhance fluency and beauty of speech, making sentences more complex, avoiding repetition, which is why we use them so often.
Non-defining Relative Clauses generally do not use that:
There is that, there are no commas. There are commas that cannot fit.
This is Bill Gates, who is one of the richest people in the world. — This is Bill Gates, who is one of the richest people in the world.
They bought this house in 1990, which was the most important purchase in their life. — They bought this house in 1990, which was the most important purchase of their life.
In Non-defining Relative Clauses speech highlighted by pauses.
When can you remove the relative pronoun from a sentence?
If you pay attention to how sentences are constructed in English, then I think you have noticed that not all relative clauses have who, which, that. Sometimes the relative pronoun «drops out» of the sentence.
In the case of Non-defining Relative Clauses, we can completely discard the entire part, but in Defining Relative Clauses there is an opportunity to miss only relative pronoun… And even then, not always. Let’s figure it out when possible.
As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, Defining Relative Clauses can be subject or object:
This is the man who lives next door. — This is the person who lives next door.
This is the man who / whom I met on holiday. — This is the person I met on vacation.
In the first case, who refers to the subject (subject relative pronoun), since we have one character in the sentence — the man.
In the second case, there are two people in the sentence — I and the man. Who / whom is an object relative pronoun, as it refers to the complement of the man.
The principle is similar here:
There is the house that is the oldest house in the city. — This is the same house, which is the oldest house in the city.
There is the house which / that I rented last year. “This is the same house that I rented last year.
I know that many of you define “correctness” by ear. Try throwing out the relative pronoun in the examples above. Which of the sentences sounds better and «more correct»? Of course, the second in each pair.
This is the man (who / whom) I met on holiday. — This is the person I met on vacation.
There is the house (which / that) I rented last year. “This is the same house that I rented last year.
The principle is this: if a sentence with Defining Relative Clause mentions two participants / subjects, one of which is the subject, and the other is the object, and Defining Relative Clause defines an add-on, then relative pronoun can be omitted from the sentence.
A few more examples to solidify your understanding:
The people (who / whom) we met on holiday were very friendly. — The people we met on vacation were very friendly.
(who / whom refers to people, this is an object for met, so we can omit who / whom)
Have you seen the newspaper (which / that) I read in the morning? — Have you seen the newspaper that I read this morning?
(which / that refers to newspaper, this is an object for read, so we can omit which / that)
I d the meal (which / that) you cooked yesterday. — I liked the dish you cooked yesterday.
(which / that refers to meal, this is an object for cooked, so we can omit which / that)
We will meet the girl (who / whom) my brother married. — We will meet the girl my brother married.
(who / whom refers to girl, this is an object for married, so we can omit who / whom)
Please note that the translations contain the words «which, which, which», despite the fact that in the English version we remove them.
Let’s sum up.
Here is a comparison of the two types of Relative Clauses, the main points that you will need to remember:
Defining Non-defining
Present the necessary, defining information about the subject or object | Present additional information |
Cannot be removed from a sentence without losing meaning | Can be removed from the proposal, because they carry additional information |
You can use who, which and that | Only who and which can be used |
Not separated by commas | Separated by commas |
Are not distinguished by pauses in speech | Highlighted by pauses in speech |
You can «throw away» object relative pronoun | Cannot be «thrown away» relative pronoun |
Who or whom?
In the examples above, you noticed that I used not only who, but also whom.
Whom is sometimes used as an object relative pronoun when there is an addition in the sentence:
This is the man whom you met at our wedding. “This is the man you met at our wedding.
This is Mary, with whom I studied. — This is Mary, with whom I studied.
However, in modern English who is used more often, even as an adjunct:
This is the man who you met at our wedding.
This is Mary, who I studied with.
Source: https://enginform.com/article/who-which-ili-relative-clauses-v-anglijskom
When are which, that and who are used
In this article, we will look at the cases when it is used which, and when — That, what is the difference in use. We will also touch on the use of who in relative clauses in English.
First of all, you need to remember that That used when we talk about people, animals and things. Which — about animals and things. Who — about people.
Sometimes which and that are used interchangeably:
What’s the name of the river which / that goes through the town? — What is the name of the river that flows through the city?
The same goes for that and who (when it comes to people):
What’s the name of the man who / that lives next door? — What is the name of the man who lives next door?
Who и which used in more formal situations.
But the use also depends on the type of the subordinate clause. If you don’t know what it is, the next paragraph will refresh your memory a bit.
In Which or Where? / In Which versus Where
In this article, we will look at the correct use of words. which и Where in sentences like This is the store at which I met my friend и This is the store where I met my friend.
In both sentences which и Where act as relative pronouns that introduce subordinate clauses. They are used to describe scene of action… Difference in use which и Where It is as follows: which is used in a formal style, while Where — in the informal.
Drinking Which
If in a courtroom or in some other formal situation you need to tell about where you shopped, then the following sentence will do: The mall at which I did the shopping that day was My World.
But which can be used not only in the official style. Often which with the preceding preposition is used to give clarity and definition to the sentence. For example, The house at which I saw you slightly different from The house in which I saw you. When consumed Where this, albeit a slight difference, is lost: The house where I saw you.
Also which used to avoid using a preposition at the end of a sentence (a preposition at the end of a sentence makes it unofficial).
For example, the sentence This is the desk in which the papers are stored more preferably in a formal situation, and the proposal This is the desk that the papers are stored in — in the informal.
The pronoun is also suitable for informal style. Where (Instead of in which): This is the desk where the papers are stored.
Using Where
A shopping offer discussed above in an informal situation, such as talking to a friend, would sound like The mall where I did the shopping that day was My World… You can also dispense with both pronouns by saying I did the shopping that day at My World mall.
Also Where
Source: https://www.englishelp.ru/learn-english/articles-for-learners/259-which-versus-where.html
What’s the difference between who, which and that?
In English, you can find a number of pronouns that can not just replace nouns, but serve to combine two sentences into one — the main and and the subordinate. First of all, we mean the English pronouns who, which and that. These pronouns are usually called connective or relative. Often this group includes whom.
We will consider each word, give general recommendations on the use of one or another English pronoun in accordance with the rules of grammar and analyze their use in practice.
To begin with, it should be understood that Relative Pronouns and Conjunctive Pronouns are different groups.
I have a friend who can draw well. — I have a friend who draws great./ That is, we will find out what kind of friend this is — a good drawing.
Do you know, who wrote this book? — Do you know who wrote this book?/ Here the pronoun combines two sentences and does not define anyone.
Although they can be expressed with the same words and even have the same translation into Russian, these pronouns serve different functions in a sentence. The main purpose of our article is to help you in choosing the right word, and not to give a classification of pronouns. Based on this, we will tell you about the features of each word, regardless of their group.
Each of the presented pronouns can be translated from English “what”, “which”. Pronouns are NOT interchangeable. We will talk about the reasons further.
5 main rules for using relative pronouns in English
There is an important topic of relative pronouns that cannot be ignored when studying English. Their use in the context of subordinate clauses has a number of interesting nuances that will be useful for you to learn.
What are the relative pronouns?
The following relative pronouns exist in English: who, that, which, which, whom, whose, and whoever / whomever. Basically, relative pronouns are needed in order to introduce relative clauses.
Usually, this kind of subordinate clauses refers to a word, phrase or meaning of the main sentence that acts as an antecedent (a noun or its equivalent, to which the subsequent pronoun refers).
In the following examples, the relative pronouns whom and that affect the subject that is the antecedent:
The neighbor, whom I saw this morning, crashed his car. — Neighbor, whom I saw this morning crashed my car.
the cake That Jane cooked was nice and tasty. — Cake, который baked by Jane was beautiful and delicious.
The use of one or another relative pronoun directly depends on the type of the relative clause. There are two types of relative clauses: restrictive (clarifying the meaning) and propaganda (supplementing new information). In both cases, the relative pronoun can be the subject, object, or possessive pronoun (whose).
Relative pronouns in restrictive clauses
Relative pronouns that introduce a subordinate clause are not separated by a comma from the main clause. In this case, the subordinate clause provides important information about the antecedent in the main clause.
This information plays a key role in the correct understanding of the meaning of the main sentence, so it cannot be omitted. Simply put, without a restrictive clause, the main clause simply loses its meaning.
Subject relative pronouns
I was nicely surprised to meet guys who also arrived to support their favorite team. — I was pleasantly surprised to meet the guys, that also came to support their favorite team.
It will be the party That everyone will remember. — It will be a party которая will be remembered by everyone.
Object relative pronouns
Relative object-related pronouns that define a person or an object can be omitted. However, official English requires the use of a relative pronoun.
If a relative pronoun is a complement of a preposition, which should be used instead of that, for example: in which (in which), about which (about which), for which (for which). Let’s look at some examples:
Official English: Dr. Smith was the person to whom I expressed my deep esteem and whose reputation was known to everyone. — Dr. Smith was a man to which I expressed my deepest respect and whose reputation was known to everyone.
Unofficial English: Dr. Smith was the person I expressed my deep esteem to and whose reputation was known to everyone.
Official English: There was a wonderful landscape at the exhibition That Jane adored. — There was a wonderful landscape at the exhibition, который delighted Jane.
Unofficial English: There was a wonderful landscape at the exhibition Jane adored.
Official English: Tom achieved the cave about which he had heard so many tales. — Tom made it to the cave, about which heard so many legends.
Unofficial English: Tom achieved the cave he had heard so many tales about.
In American English, the relative pronoun whom is used quite rarely and is usually replaced by who, and in colloquial speech it is completely omitted:
Official version: The man to whom you said hello in the morning is my uncle. — Human, which you said hello in the morning — my uncle.
Spoken version: The man you said hello to in the morning is my uncle. (The man who you said hello to in the morning is my uncle.)
However, if the relative pronoun whom appears after the preposition and is its complement, it cannot be omitted:
The man for whom she was waiting so many years finally appeared. — Finally a man appeared, whom she has waited so many years.
Relative pronouns as possessive pronouns
In English, only whose is a possessive relative pronoun. Both persons and objects can act as its antecedent.
the boy who toy engine broke yesterday was presented a new beautiful toy truck. — Boy, whose the car broke down yesterday, got a new first-class toy truck.
The bag who owner got off the bus was delivered to the nearest lost-property office. — Bag, owner where got off the bus, was taken to the nearest lost and found office.
Relative pronouns in clauses
Despite the similarity in usage, relative pronouns introducing clauses are separated from the main sentence by a comma. Usually which is a sign of a relative clause.
As a rule, pronouncing clauses do not carry valuable information about the antecedent in the main clause. This information is not key in the correct understanding of the idea of the main sentence and can be omitted without losing its meaning.
In other words, the subordinate clause is a digression that provides additional information. Let’s find out in what qualities relative pronouns can be used in subordinate pronouns.
Using That or Who / Which
The relative pronoun that is used only in clauses. It can also be replaced with who (for persons) or which (for items). The word that is often used in colloquial speech, but who and which are more common in written English. For example:
- Spoken English: Robert Burns is a Scottish poet That wrote a lot of wonderful poems and songs in the Scots language and standard English. — Robert Burns — Scottish poet, который wrote many wonderful poems and songs in Scottish dialect and literary English.
- Written, Official English: Robert Burns is a Scottish poet who wrote a lot of wonderful poems and songs in the Scots language and standard English.
Who or That
When describing people, unofficial English allows for both who and that. But when it comes to the characteristics or abilities of a person / group of persons, then it is better to use the relative pronoun that (although the use of who is also allowed):
- She is the kind of woman That always looks charming. — She is one of those women that always look adorable.
If, in the official style, we are talking about a specific person, who is preferable to use:
- The man who won the prize was a cook. — Man, который won a prize, was a cook.
That or Which
There are several situations in English where that is more appropriate than which. After the pronouns many, few, all, little, much, every (thing) and any (thing), you should use exactly that:
- There are many ways That may help him resolve this complex issue. — There are many ways in which he can solve this difficult issue.
A superlative noun also requires the relative pronoun that:
- This is the most beautiful car That he has ever seen. “This is the most beautiful car he has ever seen.
Source: https://skyeng.ru/articles/5-glavnyh-pravil-upotrebleniya-otnositelnyh-mestoimenij-v-anglijskom
In Russian about Relative Clause. Grammar, examples and exercises
Elizaveta Morozova
Heading: Grammar
Hello my dear readers.
When you hear the phrase «Relative Clause» — what do you think about? Russian people who do not like to litter their heads with all sorts of terms will not immediately find an answer. But if you hint at the words that, which or who, which are often found in the texts, they immediately understand what will be discussed.
:
- What is this?
- An important rule
- Examples of using who, which, that
- Exercises
Yes, subordinate clauses, or grammar relative clauses: — the topic of today’s conversation. I will try to tell you in the simplest way what is used, how and for what. We will also look at the translation and defining words that are used in this rule. At the end, we will definitely consolidate the knowledge gained with exercises.
Let’s start?
What is it and how to use it?
Relative clause — or in Russian the attributive subordinate clause is part of a complex sentence that depends on the main one. It usually combines two small sentences into one, or just adds new interesting information to make it clearer, let’s see an example.
I have a mother who works as a doctor. — I have a mother who works as a doctor.
I missed the bus that was going to take me to church. — I missed the bus that was supposed to take me to church.
What does the rule tell us?
The rule states that in English, definitive subordinate clauses can be either identifying (restrictive) or non-identifying (propagative).
Simply put, the former define something important in the sentence, the latter do not. Usually, non-identifying sentences can be separated by commas and, accordingly, thrown out of the sentence.
For example:
This is the new computer that I bought yesterday. — This is a new computer that I bought yesterday.
Source: https://lizasenglish.ru/grammatika/o-relative-clause.html
Who Which That: Terms of Use
Translate into English: «This is the house that Jack built.»
What word do you translate «which»? Which? Or that? Or who ?!
It is easy to get lost in these words from habit. Dealing with them is even easier.
Source: https://corp.lingualeo.com/ru/2017/10/12/who-which-that/