From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In computing, a word is the natural unit of data used by a particular processor design. A word is a fixed-sized datum handled as a unit by the instruction set or the hardware of the processor. The number of bits or digits[a] in a word (the word size, word width, or word length) is an important characteristic of any specific processor design or computer architecture.
The size of a word is reflected in many aspects of a computer’s structure and operation; the majority of the registers in a processor are usually word-sized and the largest datum that can be transferred to and from the working memory in a single operation is a word in many (not all) architectures. The largest possible address size, used to designate a location in memory, is typically a hardware word (here, «hardware word» means the full-sized natural word of the processor, as opposed to any other definition used).
Documentation for older computers with fixed word size commonly states memory sizes in words rather than bytes or characters. The documentation sometimes uses metric prefixes correctly, sometimes with rounding, e.g., 65 kilowords (KW) meaning for 65536 words, and sometimes uses them incorrectly, with kilowords (KW) meaning 1024 words (210) and megawords (MW) meaning 1,048,576 words (220). With standardization on 8-bit bytes and byte addressability, stating memory sizes in bytes, kilobytes, and megabytes with powers of 1024 rather than 1000 has become the norm, although there is some use of the IEC binary prefixes.
Several of the earliest computers (and a few modern as well) use binary-coded decimal rather than plain binary, typically having a word size of 10 or 12 decimal digits, and some early decimal computers have no fixed word length at all. Early binary systems tended to use word lengths that were some multiple of 6-bits, with the 36-bit word being especially common on mainframe computers. The introduction of ASCII led to the move to systems with word lengths that were a multiple of 8-bits, with 16-bit machines being popular in the 1970s before the move to modern processors with 32 or 64 bits.[1] Special-purpose designs like digital signal processors, may have any word length from 4 to 80 bits.[1]
The size of a word can sometimes differ from the expected due to backward compatibility with earlier computers. If multiple compatible variations or a family of processors share a common architecture and instruction set but differ in their word sizes, their documentation and software may become notationally complex to accommodate the difference (see Size families below).
Uses of words[edit]
Depending on how a computer is organized, word-size units may be used for:
- Fixed-point numbers
- Holders for fixed point, usually integer, numerical values may be available in one or in several different sizes, but one of the sizes available will almost always be the word. The other sizes, if any, are likely to be multiples or fractions of the word size. The smaller sizes are normally used only for efficient use of memory; when loaded into the processor, their values usually go into a larger, word sized holder.
- Floating-point numbers
- Holders for floating-point numerical values are typically either a word or a multiple of a word.
- Addresses
- Holders for memory addresses must be of a size capable of expressing the needed range of values but not be excessively large, so often the size used is the word though it can also be a multiple or fraction of the word size.
- Registers
- Processor registers are designed with a size appropriate for the type of data they hold, e.g. integers, floating-point numbers, or addresses. Many computer architectures use general-purpose registers that are capable of storing data in multiple representations.
- Memory–processor transfer
- When the processor reads from the memory subsystem into a register or writes a register’s value to memory, the amount of data transferred is often a word. Historically, this amount of bits which could be transferred in one cycle was also called a catena in some environments (such as the Bull GAMMA 60 [fr]).[2][3] In simple memory subsystems, the word is transferred over the memory data bus, which typically has a width of a word or half-word. In memory subsystems that use caches, the word-sized transfer is the one between the processor and the first level of cache; at lower levels of the memory hierarchy larger transfers (which are a multiple of the word size) are normally used.
- Unit of address resolution
- In a given architecture, successive address values designate successive units of memory; this unit is the unit of address resolution. In most computers, the unit is either a character (e.g. a byte) or a word. (A few computers have used bit resolution.) If the unit is a word, then a larger amount of memory can be accessed using an address of a given size at the cost of added complexity to access individual characters. On the other hand, if the unit is a byte, then individual characters can be addressed (i.e. selected during the memory operation).
- Instructions
- Machine instructions are normally the size of the architecture’s word, such as in RISC architectures, or a multiple of the «char» size that is a fraction of it. This is a natural choice since instructions and data usually share the same memory subsystem. In Harvard architectures the word sizes of instructions and data need not be related, as instructions and data are stored in different memories; for example, the processor in the 1ESS electronic telephone switch has 37-bit instructions and 23-bit data words.
Word size choice[edit]
When a computer architecture is designed, the choice of a word size is of substantial importance. There are design considerations which encourage particular bit-group sizes for particular uses (e.g. for addresses), and these considerations point to different sizes for different uses. However, considerations of economy in design strongly push for one size, or a very few sizes related by multiples or fractions (submultiples) to a primary size. That preferred size becomes the word size of the architecture.
Character size was in the past (pre-variable-sized character encoding) one of the influences on unit of address resolution and the choice of word size. Before the mid-1960s, characters were most often stored in six bits; this allowed no more than 64 characters, so the alphabet was limited to upper case. Since it is efficient in time and space to have the word size be a multiple of the character size, word sizes in this period were usually multiples of 6 bits (in binary machines). A common choice then was the 36-bit word, which is also a good size for the numeric properties of a floating point format.
After the introduction of the IBM System/360 design, which uses eight-bit characters and supports lower-case letters, the standard size of a character (or more accurately, a byte) becomes eight bits. Word sizes thereafter are naturally multiples of eight bits, with 16, 32, and 64 bits being commonly used.
Variable-word architectures[edit]
Early machine designs included some that used what is often termed a variable word length. In this type of organization, an operand has no fixed length. Depending on the machine and the instruction, the length might be denoted by a count field, by a delimiting character, or by an additional bit called, e.g., flag, or word mark. Such machines often use binary-coded decimal in 4-bit digits, or in 6-bit characters, for numbers. This class of machines includes the IBM 702, IBM 705, IBM 7080, IBM 7010, UNIVAC 1050, IBM 1401, IBM 1620, and RCA 301.
Most of these machines work on one unit of memory at a time and since each instruction or datum is several units long, each instruction takes several cycles just to access memory. These machines are often quite slow because of this. For example, instruction fetches on an IBM 1620 Model I take 8 cycles (160 μs) just to read the 12 digits of the instruction (the Model II reduced this to 6 cycles, or 4 cycles if the instruction did not need both address fields). Instruction execution takes a variable number of cycles, depending on the size of the operands.
Word, bit and byte addressing[edit]
The memory model of an architecture is strongly influenced by the word size. In particular, the resolution of a memory address, that is, the smallest unit that can be designated by an address, has often been chosen to be the word. In this approach, the word-addressable machine approach, address values which differ by one designate adjacent memory words. This is natural in machines which deal almost always in word (or multiple-word) units, and has the advantage of allowing instructions to use minimally sized fields to contain addresses, which can permit a smaller instruction size or a larger variety of instructions.
When byte processing is to be a significant part of the workload, it is usually more advantageous to use the byte, rather than the word, as the unit of address resolution. Address values which differ by one designate adjacent bytes in memory. This allows an arbitrary character within a character string to be addressed straightforwardly. A word can still be addressed, but the address to be used requires a few more bits than the word-resolution alternative. The word size needs to be an integer multiple of the character size in this organization. This addressing approach was used in the IBM 360, and has been the most common approach in machines designed since then.
When the workload involves processing fields of different sizes, it can be advantageous to address to the bit. Machines with bit addressing may have some instructions that use a programmer-defined byte size and other instructions that operate on fixed data sizes. As an example, on the IBM 7030[4] («Stretch»), a floating point instruction can only address words while an integer arithmetic instruction can specify a field length of 1-64 bits, a byte size of 1-8 bits and an accumulator offset of 0-127 bits.
In a byte-addressable machine with storage-to-storage (SS) instructions, there are typically move instructions to copy one or multiple bytes from one arbitrary location to another. In a byte-oriented (byte-addressable) machine without SS instructions, moving a single byte from one arbitrary location to another is typically:
- LOAD the source byte
- STORE the result back in the target byte
Individual bytes can be accessed on a word-oriented machine in one of two ways. Bytes can be manipulated by a combination of shift and mask operations in registers. Moving a single byte from one arbitrary location to another may require the equivalent of the following:
- LOAD the word containing the source byte
- SHIFT the source word to align the desired byte to the correct position in the target word
- AND the source word with a mask to zero out all but the desired bits
- LOAD the word containing the target byte
- AND the target word with a mask to zero out the target byte
- OR the registers containing the source and target words to insert the source byte
- STORE the result back in the target location
Alternatively many word-oriented machines implement byte operations with instructions using special byte pointers in registers or memory. For example, the PDP-10 byte pointer contained the size of the byte in bits (allowing different-sized bytes to be accessed), the bit position of the byte within the word, and the word address of the data. Instructions could automatically adjust the pointer to the next byte on, for example, load and deposit (store) operations.
Powers of two[edit]
Different amounts of memory are used to store data values with different degrees of precision. The commonly used sizes are usually a power of two multiple of the unit of address resolution (byte or word). Converting the index of an item in an array into the memory address offset of the item then requires only a shift operation rather than a multiplication. In some cases this relationship can also avoid the use of division operations. As a result, most modern computer designs have word sizes (and other operand sizes) that are a power of two times the size of a byte.
Size families[edit]
As computer designs have grown more complex, the central importance of a single word size to an architecture has decreased. Although more capable hardware can use a wider variety of sizes of data, market forces exert pressure to maintain backward compatibility while extending processor capability. As a result, what might have been the central word size in a fresh design has to coexist as an alternative size to the original word size in a backward compatible design. The original word size remains available in future designs, forming the basis of a size family.
In the mid-1970s, DEC designed the VAX to be a 32-bit successor of the 16-bit PDP-11. They used word for a 16-bit quantity, while longword referred to a 32-bit quantity; this terminology is the same as the terminology used for the PDP-11. This was in contrast to earlier machines, where the natural unit of addressing memory would be called a word, while a quantity that is one half a word would be called a halfword. In fitting with this scheme, a VAX quadword is 64 bits. They continued this 16-bit word/32-bit longword/64-bit quadword terminology with the 64-bit Alpha.
Another example is the x86 family, of which processors of three different word lengths (16-bit, later 32- and 64-bit) have been released, while word continues to designate a 16-bit quantity. As software is routinely ported from one word-length to the next, some APIs and documentation define or refer to an older (and thus shorter) word-length than the full word length on the CPU that software may be compiled for. Also, similar to how bytes are used for small numbers in many programs, a shorter word (16 or 32 bits) may be used in contexts where the range of a wider word is not needed (especially where this can save considerable stack space or cache memory space). For example, Microsoft’s Windows API maintains the programming language definition of WORD as 16 bits, despite the fact that the API may be used on a 32- or 64-bit x86 processor, where the standard word size would be 32 or 64 bits, respectively. Data structures containing such different sized words refer to them as:
- WORD (16 bits/2 bytes)
- DWORD (32 bits/4 bytes)
- QWORD (64 bits/8 bytes)
A similar phenomenon has developed in Intel’s x86 assembly language – because of the support for various sizes (and backward compatibility) in the instruction set, some instruction mnemonics carry «d» or «q» identifiers denoting «double-«, «quad-» or «double-quad-«, which are in terms of the architecture’s original 16-bit word size.
An example with a different word size is the IBM System/360 family. In the System/360 architecture, System/370 architecture and System/390 architecture, there are 8-bit bytes, 16-bit halfwords, 32-bit words and 64-bit doublewords. The z/Architecture, which is the 64-bit member of that architecture family, continues to refer to 16-bit halfwords, 32-bit words, and 64-bit doublewords, and additionally features 128-bit quadwords.
In general, new processors must use the same data word lengths and virtual address widths as an older processor to have binary compatibility with that older processor.
Often carefully written source code – written with source-code compatibility and software portability in mind – can be recompiled to run on a variety of processors, even ones with different data word lengths or different address widths or both.
Table of word sizes[edit]
key: bit: bits, c: characters, d: decimal digits, w: word size of architecture, n: variable size, wm: Word mark | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Computer architecture |
Word size w | Integer sizes |
Floatingpoint sizes |
Instruction sizes |
Unit of address resolution |
Char size |
1837 | Babbage Analytical engine |
50 d | w | — | Five different cards were used for different functions, exact size of cards not known. | w | — |
1941 | Zuse Z3 | 22 bit | — | w | 8 bit | w | — |
1942 | ABC | 50 bit | w | — | — | — | — |
1944 | Harvard Mark I | 23 d | w | — | 24 bit | — | — |
1946 (1948) {1953} |
ENIAC (w/Panel #16[5]) {w/Panel #26[6]} |
10 d | w, 2w (w) {w} |
— | — (2 d, 4 d, 6 d, 8 d) {2 d, 4 d, 6 d, 8 d} |
— — {w} |
— |
1948 | Manchester Baby | 32 bit | w | — | w | w | — |
1951 | UNIVAC I | 12 d | w | — | 1⁄2w | w | 1 d |
1952 | IAS machine | 40 bit | w | — | 1⁄2w | w | 5 bit |
1952 | Fast Universal Digital Computer M-2 | 34 bit | w? | w | 34 bit = 4-bit opcode plus 3×10 bit address | 10 bit | — |
1952 | IBM 701 | 36 bit | 1⁄2w, w | — | 1⁄2w | 1⁄2w, w | 6 bit |
1952 | UNIVAC 60 | n d | 1 d, … 10 d | — | — | — | 2 d, 3 d |
1952 | ARRA I | 30 bit | w | — | w | w | 5 bit |
1953 | IBM 702 | n c | 0 c, … 511 c | — | 5 c | c | 6 bit |
1953 | UNIVAC 120 | n d | 1 d, … 10 d | — | — | — | 2 d, 3 d |
1953 | ARRA II | 30 bit | w | 2w | 1⁄2w | w | 5 bit |
1954 (1955) |
IBM 650 (w/IBM 653) |
10 d | w | — (w) |
w | w | 2 d |
1954 | IBM 704 | 36 bit | w | w | w | w | 6 bit |
1954 | IBM 705 | n c | 0 c, … 255 c | — | 5 c | c | 6 bit |
1954 | IBM NORC | 16 d | w | w, 2w | w | w | — |
1956 | IBM 305 | n d | 1 d, … 100 d | — | 10 d | d | 1 d |
1956 | ARMAC | 34 bit | w | w | 1⁄2w | w | 5 bit, 6 bit |
1956 | LGP-30 | 31 bit | w | — | 16 bit | w | 6 bit |
1957 | Autonetics Recomp I | 40 bit | w, 79 bit, 8 d, 15 d | — | 1⁄2w | 1⁄2w, w | 5 bit |
1958 | UNIVAC II | 12 d | w | — | 1⁄2w | w | 1 d |
1958 | SAGE | 32 bit | 1⁄2w | — | w | w | 6 bit |
1958 | Autonetics Recomp II | 40 bit | w, 79 bit, 8 d, 15 d | 2w | 1⁄2w | 1⁄2w, w | 5 bit |
1958 | Setun | 6 trit (~9.5 bits)[b] | up to 6 tryte | up to 3 trytes | 4 trit? | ||
1958 | Electrologica X1 | 27 bit | w | 2w | w | w | 5 bit, 6 bit |
1959 | IBM 1401 | n c | 1 c, … | — | 1 c, 2 c, 4 c, 5 c, 7 c, 8 c | c | 6 bit + wm |
1959 (TBD) |
IBM 1620 | n d | 2 d, … | — (4 d, … 102 d) |
12 d | d | 2 d |
1960 | LARC | 12 d | w, 2w | w, 2w | w | w | 2 d |
1960 | CDC 1604 | 48 bit | w | w | 1⁄2w | w | 6 bit |
1960 | IBM 1410 | n c | 1 c, … | — | 1 c, 2 c, 6 c, 7 c, 11 c, 12 c | c | 6 bit + wm |
1960 | IBM 7070 | 10 d[c] | w, 1-9 d | w | w | w, d | 2 d |
1960 | PDP-1 | 18 bit | w | — | w | w | 6 bit |
1960 | Elliott 803 | 39 bit | |||||
1961 | IBM 7030 (Stretch) |
64 bit | 1 bit, … 64 bit, 1 d, … 16 d |
w | 1⁄2w, w | bit (integer), 1⁄2w (branch), w (float) |
1 bit, … 8 bit |
1961 | IBM 7080 | n c | 0 c, … 255 c | — | 5 c | c | 6 bit |
1962 | GE-6xx | 36 bit | w, 2 w | w, 2 w, 80 bit | w | w | 6 bit, 9 bit |
1962 | UNIVAC III | 25 bit | w, 2w, 3w, 4w, 6 d, 12 d | — | w | w | 6 bit |
1962 | Autonetics D-17B Minuteman I Guidance Computer |
27 bit | 11 bit, 24 bit | — | 24 bit | w | — |
1962 | UNIVAC 1107 | 36 bit | 1⁄6w, 1⁄3w, 1⁄2w, w | w | w | w | 6 bit |
1962 | IBM 7010 | n c | 1 c, … | — | 1 c, 2 c, 6 c, 7 c, 11 c, 12 c | c | 6 b + wm |
1962 | IBM 7094 | 36 bit | w | w, 2w | w | w | 6 bit |
1962 | SDS 9 Series | 24 bit | w | 2w | w | w | |
1963 (1966) |
Apollo Guidance Computer | 15 bit | w | — | w, 2w | w | — |
1963 | Saturn Launch Vehicle Digital Computer | 26 bit | w | — | 13 bit | w | — |
1964/1966 | PDP-6/PDP-10 | 36 bit | w | w, 2 w | w | w | 6 bit 7 bit (typical) 9 bit |
1964 | Titan | 48 bit | w | w | w | w | w |
1964 | CDC 6600 | 60 bit | w | w | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w | w | 6 bit |
1964 | Autonetics D-37C Minuteman II Guidance Computer |
27 bit | 11 bit, 24 bit | — | 24 bit | w | 4 bit, 5 bit |
1965 | Gemini Guidance Computer | 39 bit | 26 bit | — | 13 bit | 13 bit, 26 | —bit |
1965 | IBM 1130 | 16 bit | w, 2w | 2w, 3w | w, 2w | w | 8 bit |
1965 | IBM System/360 | 32 bit | 1⁄2w, w, 1 d, … 16 d |
w, 2w | 1⁄2w, w, 11⁄2w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1965 | UNIVAC 1108 | 36 bit | 1⁄6w, 1⁄4w, 1⁄3w, 1⁄2w, w, 2w | w, 2w | w | w | 6 bit, 9 bit |
1965 | PDP-8 | 12 bit | w | — | w | w | 8 bit |
1965 | Electrologica X8 | 27 bit | w | 2w | w | w | 6 bit, 7 bit |
1966 | SDS Sigma 7 | 32 bit | 1⁄2w, w | w, 2w | w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1969 | Four-Phase Systems AL1 | 8 bit | w | — | ? | ? | ? |
1970 | MP944 | 20 bit | w | — | ? | ? | ? |
1970 | PDP-11 | 16 bit | w | 2w, 4w | w, 2w, 3w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1971 | CDC STAR-100 | 64 bit | 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | bit | 8 bit |
1971 | TMS1802NC | 4 bit | w | — | ? | ? | — |
1971 | Intel 4004 | 4 bit | w, d | — | 2w, 4w | w | — |
1972 | Intel 8008 | 8 bit | w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w | w | 8 bit |
1972 | Calcomp 900 | 9 bit | w | — | w, 2w | w | 8 bit |
1974 | Intel 8080 | 8 bit | w, 2w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w | w | 8 bit |
1975 | ILLIAC IV | 64 bit | w | w, 1⁄2w | w | w | — |
1975 | Motorola 6800 | 8 bit | w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w | w | 8 bit |
1975 | MOS Tech. 6501 MOS Tech. 6502 |
8 bit | w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w | w | 8 bit |
1976 | Cray-1 | 64 bit | 24 bit, w | w | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w | w | 8 bit |
1976 | Zilog Z80 | 8 bit | w, 2w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w, 4w, 5w | w | 8 bit |
1978 (1980) |
16-bit x86 (Intel 8086) (w/floating point: Intel 8087) |
16 bit | 1⁄2w, w, 2 d | — (2w, 4w, 5w, 17 d) |
1⁄2w, w, … 7w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1978 | VAX | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w, 1 d, … 31 d, 1 bit, … 32 bit | w, 2w | 1⁄4w, … 141⁄4w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1979 (1984) |
Motorola 68000 series (w/floating point) |
32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w, 2 d | — (w, 2w, 21⁄2w) |
1⁄2w, w, … 71⁄2w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1985 | IA-32 (Intel 80386) (w/floating point) | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | — (w, 2w, 80 bit) |
8 bit, … 120 bit 1⁄4w … 33⁄4w |
8 bit | 8 bit |
1985 | ARMv1 | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, w | — | w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1985 | MIPS I | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | w, 2w | w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1991 | Cray C90 | 64 bit | 32 bit, w | w | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, 48 bit | w | 8 bit |
1992 | Alpha | 64 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1992 | PowerPC | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | w, 2w | w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
1996 | ARMv4 (w/Thumb) |
32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | — | w (1⁄2w, w) |
8 bit | 8 bit |
2000 | IBM z/Architecture (w/vector facility) |
64 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w 1 d, … 31 d |
1⁄2w, w, 2w | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, 3⁄4w | 8 bit | 8 bit, UTF-16, UTF-32 |
2001 | IA-64 | 64 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | 41 bit (in 128-bit bundles)[7] | 8 bit | 8 bit |
2001 | ARMv6 (w/VFP) |
32 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄2w, w | — (w, 2w) |
1⁄2w, w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
2003 | x86-64 | 64 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w, 80 bit | 8 bit, … 120 bit | 8 bit | 8 bit |
2013 | ARMv8-A and ARMv9-A | 64 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
Year | Computer architecture |
Word size w | Integer sizes |
Floatingpoint sizes |
Instruction sizes |
Unit of address resolution |
Char size |
key: bit: bits, d: decimal digits, w: word size of architecture, n: variable size |
[8][9]
See also[edit]
- Integer (computer science)
Notes[edit]
- ^ Many early computers were decimal, and a few were ternary
- ^ The bit equivalent is computed by taking the amount of information entropy provided by the trit, which is . This gives an equivalent of about 9.51 bits for 6 trits.
- ^ Three-state sign
References[edit]
- ^ a b Beebe, Nelson H. F. (2017-08-22). «Chapter I. Integer arithmetic». The Mathematical-Function Computation Handbook — Programming Using the MathCW Portable Software Library (1 ed.). Salt Lake City, UT, USA: Springer International Publishing AG. p. 970. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64110-2. ISBN 978-3-319-64109-6. LCCN 2017947446. S2CID 30244721.
- ^ Dreyfus, Phillippe (1958-05-08) [1958-05-06]. Written at Los Angeles, California, USA. System design of the Gamma 60 (PDF). Western Joint Computer Conference: Contrasts in Computers. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 130–133. IRE-ACM-AIEE ’58 (Western). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-04-03. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
[…] Internal data code is used: Quantitative (numerical) data are coded in a 4-bit decimal code; qualitative (alpha-numerical) data are coded in a 6-bit alphanumerical code. The internal instruction code means that the instructions are coded in straight binary code.
As to the internal information length, the information quantum is called a «catena,» and it is composed of 24 bits representing either 6 decimal digits, or 4 alphanumerical characters. This quantum must contain a multiple of 4 and 6 bits to represent a whole number of decimal or alphanumeric characters. Twenty-four bits was found to be a good compromise between the minimum 12 bits, which would lead to a too-low transfer flow from a parallel readout core memory, and 36 bits or more, which was judged as too large an information quantum. The catena is to be considered as the equivalent of a character in variable word length machines, but it cannot be called so, as it may contain several characters. It is transferred in series to and from the main memory.
Not wanting to call a «quantum» a word, or a set of characters a letter, (a word is a word, and a quantum is something else), a new word was made, and it was called a «catena.» It is an English word and exists in Webster’s although it does not in French. Webster’s definition of the word catena is, «a connected series;» therefore, a 24-bit information item. The word catena will be used hereafter.
The internal code, therefore, has been defined. Now what are the external data codes? These depend primarily upon the information handling device involved. The Gamma 60 [fr] is designed to handle information relevant to any binary coded structure. Thus an 80-column punched card is considered as a 960-bit information item; 12 rows multiplied by 80 columns equals 960 possible punches; is stored as an exact image in 960 magnetic cores of the main memory with 2 card columns occupying one catena. […] - ^ Blaauw, Gerrit Anne; Brooks, Jr., Frederick Phillips; Buchholz, Werner (1962). «4: Natural Data Units» (PDF). In Buchholz, Werner (ed.). Planning a Computer System – Project Stretch. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. / The Maple Press Company, York, PA. pp. 39–40. LCCN 61-10466. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-04-03. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
[…] Terms used here to describe the structure imposed by the machine design, in addition to bit, are listed below.
Byte denotes a group of bits used to encode a character, or the number of bits transmitted in parallel to and from input-output units. A term other than character is used here because a given character may be represented in different applications by more than one code, and different codes may use different numbers of bits (i.e., different byte sizes). In input-output transmission the grouping of bits may be completely arbitrary and have no relation to actual characters. (The term is coined from bite, but respelled to avoid accidental mutation to bit.)
A word consists of the number of data bits transmitted in parallel from or to memory in one memory cycle. Word size is thus defined as a structural property of the memory. (The term catena was coined for this purpose by the designers of the Bull GAMMA 60 [fr] computer.)
Block refers to the number of words transmitted to or from an input-output unit in response to a single input-output instruction. Block size is a structural property of an input-output unit; it may have been fixed by the design or left to be varied by the program. […] - ^ «Format» (PDF). Reference Manual 7030 Data Processing System (PDF). IBM. August 1961. pp. 50–57. Retrieved 2021-12-15.
- ^ Clippinger, Richard F. [in German] (1948-09-29). «A Logical Coding System Applied to the ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer)». Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, US: Ballistic Research Laboratories. Report No. 673; Project No. TB3-0007 of the Research and Development Division, Ordnance Department. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Clippinger, Richard F. [in German] (1948-09-29). «A Logical Coding System Applied to the ENIAC». Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, US: Ballistic Research Laboratories. Section VIII: Modified ENIAC. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ «4. Instruction Formats» (PDF). Intel Itanium Architecture Software Developer’s Manual. Vol. 3: Intel Itanium Instruction Set Reference. p. 3:293. Retrieved 2022-04-25.
Three instructions are grouped together into 128-bit sized and aligned containers called bundles. Each bundle contains three 41-bit instruction slots and a 5-bit template field.
- ^ Blaauw, Gerrit Anne; Brooks, Jr., Frederick Phillips (1997). Computer Architecture: Concepts and Evolution (1 ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-10557-8. (1213 pages) (NB. This is a single-volume edition. This work was also available in a two-volume version.)
- ^ Ralston, Anthony; Reilly, Edwin D. (1993). Encyclopedia of Computer Science (3rd ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold. ISBN 0-442-27679-6.
Consider the following:
CPU (processor), RAM (main memory), I/O devices (mouse, keyboard, printer), Bus (data transfer component).
How would you like these computer parts to communicate and transfer data?
you definitely need a fixed size of bits to be considered a single unit of data.
For that, Computer scientists agreed to standardize this unit to be 32 bits or 64 bits (depending on the manufacturer choice).
They gave this unit a name and called it a Word.
So a Word is nothing but a unit of data (bunch of bits (signal charges of zeros and ones)) that moves around from a computer component to another.
For instance buses are built with 32 bits (4 bytes) and some with 64 bits (8 bytes). Likewise with the CPU (hardware) and operating systems (software) are built with either 32 bits or 64 bits.
It just happened to be the standard unit named Word and sized 32 bits or 64 bits.
Ps: Word is one of the many data size units that move around inside the computer, different computer components use different sizes to transport data (signals charges that represent zeros and ones), for instance RAM can use size of 64 bits while Buses can use 32 bits. Hardware designers design the architecture of components taking into account these size differences to either implement Word size of 32 bits on only CPU but 64 bits on RAM, or implement the same size on all components, …etc. Word size used to be 8 bits (1 byte), but nowadays the most comment unit size is 64 bits on most computer components such as CPU or RAM, or Bus, …etc.
Word “size” refers to the amount of data a CPU’s internal data registers can hold and process at one time. Modern desktop computers have 64-bit words. Computers embedded in appliances and consumer products have word sizes of 8, 16 or 32 bits. See bit and byte.
Contents
- 1 What is the word size of a computer measured in?
- 2 What is the size of each word?
- 3 Is a word 16 or 32 bits?
- 4 What is a word in computers?
- 5 What is the word size of a 64 bit computer?
- 6 Why is a computer word size important?
- 7 How do you find a word size?
- 8 What is digital word?
- 9 What do you mean by 32 bit or 64-bit word size?
- 10 What is 64-bit system?
- 11 What are the speed and word size of the CPU?
- 12 What is word in C?
- 13 What is word size in RAM?
- 14 How much is a word size?
- 15 How do I know 64-bit or 32-bit?
- 16 What is word size of a processor?
- 17 What is the effect of word size on processor speed?
- 18 What are the 7 types of computers?
- 19 What is the word size of 32 GB RAM?
- 20 Is digitally a real word?
What is the word size of a computer measured in?
“Word size” refers to the number of bits processed by a computer’s CPU in one go (these days, typically 32 bits or 64 bits).
What is the size of each word?
A byte is eight bits, a word is 2 bytes (16 bits), a doubleword is 4 bytes (32 bits), and a quadword is 8 bytes (64 bits).
Is a word 16 or 32 bits?
In x86 assembly language WORD , DOUBLEWORD ( DWORD ) and QUADWORD ( QWORD ) are used for 2, 4 and 8 byte sizes, regardless of the machine word size. A word is typically the “native” data size of the CPU. That is, on a 16-bit CPU, a word is 16 bits, on a 32-bit CPU, it’s 32 and so on.
What is a word in computers?
In computer architecture, a word is a unit of data of a defined bit length that can be addressed and moved between storage and the computer processor.A word can contain a computer instruction, a storage address, or application data that is to be manipulated (for example, added to the data in another word space).
What is the word size of a 64 bit computer?
Each set of 8 bits is called a byte. Two bytes together as in a 16 bit machine make up a word , 32 bit machines are 4 bytes which is a double word and 64 bit machines are 8 bytes which is a quad word.
Why is a computer word size important?
Explanation: The word size of a computer generally indicates the largest integer it can process in a single instruction, and the size of a memory address, which is usually, but not necessarily the same as the integer size. The main indication of the word size is how much memory the processor can address.
How do you find a word size?
That being said, on Windows with Intel processors, the nominal word size will be either 32 or 64 bits and you can easily figure this out:
- if your program is compiled for 32-bits, then the nominal word size is 32-bits.
- if you have compiled a 64-bit program then then the nominal word size is 64-bits.
What is digital word?
1 : relating to or using calculation directly with digits rather than through measurable physical quantities. 2 : of or relating to data in the form of numerical digits digital images digital broadcasting. 3 : providing displayed or recorded information in numerical digits from an automatic device a digital watch.
What do you mean by 32 bit or 64-bit word size?
Traditionally the term “word” refers to the size of the processor’s registers and main data path. By that definition a “word” would be 32 bit on your 32-bit system and 64-bit on your 64-bit system.
What is 64-bit system?
An operating system that is designed to work in a computer that processes 64 bits at a time.A 64-bit operating system will not work in a 32-bit computer, but a 32-bit operating system will run in a 64-bit computer. See 64-bit computing.
What are the speed and word size of the CPU?
(1) The word size for a computer is the number of bits that the central processing unit (CPU) of a particular computer can handle at one time. These word sizes range from a nibble to more than 128 bits. (2) Word size = 16 bits (or two bytes).
A word is an integer number of bytes for example, one, two, four, or eight. When someone talks about the “n-bits” of a machine, they are generally talking about the machine’s word size. For example, when people say the Pentium is a 32-bit chip, they are referring to its word size, which is 32 bits, or four bytes.
What is word size in RAM?
Traditionally, a “word” in computer architectures was generally the smallest addressable unit of memory. And traditionally this has been the same as the machine’s general purpose register size.
How much is a word size?
Word “size” refers to the amount of data a CPU’s internal data registers can hold and process at one time. Modern desktop computers have 64-bit words. Computers embedded in appliances and consumer products have word sizes of 8, 16 or 32 bits.
How do I know 64-bit or 32-bit?
Press and hold the Windows key and the Pause key. In the System window, next to System type, it lists 32-bit Operating System for a 32-bit version of Windows, and 64-bit Operating System if you’re running the 64-bit version.
What is word size of a processor?
A word is a fixed-sized piece of data handled as a unit by the instruction set or the hardware of the processor.Modern processors, including embedded systems, usually have a word size of 8, 16, 24, 32, or 64 bits, while modern general purpose computers usually use 32 or 64 bits.
What is the effect of word size on processor speed?
On the x86 processors (so this is what happens on all modern PC and Mac), for historical reasons, the 64-bit mode does not come only with 64-bit registers; it also offers twice as many registers to the application, and this helps performance by a fair bit.
What are the 7 types of computers?
Types of computers
- Supercomputer.
- Mainframe.
- Server Computer.
- Workstation Computer.
- Personal Computer or PC.
- Microcontroller.
- Smartphone. 8 References.
What is the word size of 32 GB RAM?
A 32bit CPU will have a 32bit word, a 64bit CPU will deal with 64bit words.
Is digitally a real word?
Yes, digitally is in the scrabble dictionary.
A byte is eight bits, a word is 2 bytes (16 bits), a doubleword is 4 bytes (32 bits), and a quadword is 8 bytes (64 bits). Figure 29-2 shows the byte order of each of the fundamental data types when referenced as operands in memory.
What is meant by word size in computer?
The word size of a computer generally indicates the largest integer it can process in a single instruction, and the size of a memory address, which is usually, but not necessarily the same as the integer size. The main indication of the word size is how much memory the processor can address.
What is word data type?
Bytes, words, and doublewords are the fundamental data types (refer to Figure 2-2 ). A word thus contains 16 bits. The bits of a word are numbered from 0 through 15; bit 0 is the least significant bit. The byte containing bit 0 of the word is called the low byte; the byte containing bit 15 is called the high byte.
What is word size?
Data structures containing such different sized words refer to them as WORD (16 bits/2 bytes), DWORD (32 bits/4 bytes) and QWORD (64 bits/8 bytes) respectively.
Is a computer word size?
“In computing, a word is the natural unit of data used by a particular processor design. Modern processors, including embedded systems, usually have a word size of 8, 16, 24, 32, or 64 bits, while modern general purpose computers usually use 32 or 64 bits.
What are 4 types of storage devices?
External storage devices
- External HDDs and SSDs.
- Flash memory devices.
- Optical Storage Devices.
- Floppy Disks.
- Primary Storage: Random Access Memory (RAM)
- Secondary Storage: Hard Disk Drives (HDD) & Solid-State Drives (SSD)
- Hard Disk Drives (HDD)
- Solid-State Drives (SSD)
What is the smallest memory?
A byte is the smallest unit of memory used in today’s computing. Bytes consist of eight bits, and a byte is used to encode a single number, letter, or symbol.
What is 32 bit word size?
What are the different data types?
What are Data Types and Why are They Important?
- Integer (int)
- Floating Point (float)
- Character (char)
- String (str or text)
- Boolean (bool)
- Enumerated type (enum)
- Array.
- Date.
How big can a word be in memory?
It can also be defined as, a memory word is certain bytes that bidirectional data bus can carry at a time. Say, size of the data bus is 16 bits, it means it can carry a maximum of 16 bits of data at a time. In such case we can say that word size is 2 bytes. And such a technique is called word addressable memory.
What is the address of the memory on a computer?
Each location or cell has a unique address, which varies from zero to memory size minus one. For example, if the computer has 64k words, then this memory unit has 64 * 1024 = 65536 memory locations. The address of these locations varies from 0 to 65535. Cache memory is a very high speed semiconductor memory which can speed up the CPU.
When is data written to memory it is called a word?
When the processor reads from the memory subsystem into a register or writes a register’s value to memory, the amount of data transferred is often a word. Historically, this amount of bits which could be transferred in one cycle was also called a catena in some environments (such as the Bull GAMMA 60 [ fr] ).
How many words does a 4 GB RAM have?
Since, the size of memory word is 4 bytes. A 4 GB ram will have 1 GB memory words and to address 1 GB memory words in the main memory we need only 30 bits. So, two higher order bits of 32 bit memory address are generally discarded to make it a 30 bit address and placed in the MAR.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd2T1r8ujMc
What Does Word Size Mean?
In computing, word size refers to the maximum number of bits that a CPU can process at a time. A word is a fixed-sized piece of data which is dictated by the processor hardware architecture; fixed in a sense that it is the maximum size that the processor is always using, yet variable in the sense that word sizes vary amongst processor architectures, most notably because of generation and the state of technology.
Techopedia Explains Word Size
Word size has varied in size and even in meaning throughout the history of the computer. Originally, “word” meant 16 bits, as that was the maximum possible value at the time. But as processor hardware technology progressed and computers were able to handle larger and larger amounts of data, word simply became the maximum possible number of bits that the processor in question can process. So word size could be as low as 4 bits or as high as 64 bits, depending on what a particular processor can handle.
Word size is used for a number of concepts, all relating to processing. It is used in any of the following:
- Addresses — The address must be able to represent the full range possible, so it uses a full word or a multiple of it.
- Fixed-point numbers — Integers are available in different sizes, but usually it takes the size of the full word supported by the processor.
- Floating-point numbers — Holders for floating-point numbers typically use the full word size length or multiples of it.
- Registers — The size of the register depends on the kind of register and what its purpose is, but a general-purpose register usually uses the maximum word size capability of the processor.
- Instructions — Instruction sets for processors are often coded in full word size.
A word is a set number of bits managed as a unit.
Contents
- 1 Hardware Word
- 2 Common Names for Various Word Sizes
- 2.1 Bit
- 2.2 Byte
- 2.3 Octet
- 2.4 Nibble
- 2.5 Half word, Single word, Double word, Quad word
Hardware Word
A hardware word is the group of bits normally managed by a processor. The word size is a distinguishing feature of a processor, and is typically a power-of-two multiple of eight bits (8, 16, 32, or 64 bits), although some rare or early processors used different word sizes.
The word size is usually associated with the size of general-purpose registers and the amount of data read from or written to memory at one time. Most modern processors can read/write alternate word sizes (for example, a «64-bit» x86_64 system can also read/write 32, 16, and 8 bit values to/from memory, and 64-bit registers can be accessed as 32, 16, or 8-bit subsets). Additionally, many modern systems use a different memory word size than CPU word size (for example, a «64-bit» system may be built to read/write memory 128 bits at a time), but this is transparent to the programmer and user.
Common Names for Various Word Sizes
Bit
A bit is a single binary digit, a value that can take one of two states. These states may be referred to as:
- 1 or 0
- True or False
- On or Off (electrically)
- Positive or Negative charge, or Forward or Reverse current flow (electrically — differential signalling)
Byte
A byte is a collection of eight bits. It is a convenient size for use with many small character sets such as ASCII, ISO8859, and EBCDIC, and can also be used with the UTF-8 encoding of Unicode. It is often viewed as the smallest hardware word size that makes sense for general-purpose computing.
Most computers with larger hardware word sizes continue to rank memory, storage, and data sizes in bytes (or prefixed multiples of bytes) for comparability. For example, an x86_64 system will be advertised as having «16 gigabytes» of memory instead of «2 gigawords».
Octet
Another name for byte, commonly used in telecommunication standards and in French.
Nibble
A nibble (or nybble) is a half-byte, corresponding to one hexadecimal or BCD digit.
Half word, Single word, Double word, Quad word
The terms half word (or halfword or half-word), single word, double word, and quad word are often used in contemporary computing to refer to common word sizes relative to a 32-bit base word size:
- half word = 16 bits
- single word = 32 bits
- double word = 64 bits
- quad word = 128 bits
This terminology can be seen, for example, in the lane naming conventions for AArch64 SIMD (where v0.8h
refers to the 128-bit vector register 0 divided in eight half word lanes) and x86_86 instruction suffixes (MOVQ to move a quad word).
The 32-bit base size is reflective of the 32-bit standard integer size used in the predominant LP64 (and less common ILP32) programming models.
The word size of the CPU doesn’t really limit partition sizes any more than it limits disk sizes, at least in any kind of a sense the word «partition» is used in the context of hard disks. It’s entirely possible to have partition sizes well in excess of 4 GB on a computer with a 32-bit processor. I think I had a >400 GB partition on the 500 GB hard drive of a 32-bit PC.
The CPU (or the compiled machine code) would have needed to do extra juggling to deal with hard drive addresses larger than 32-bit, just like it would have needed to when operating with 64-bit integers for some other purpose, because they wouldn’t have fit in a single register.
That wouldn’t be a big deal for hard disk sizes, though, because hard disk access is almost glacially slow compared to memory access anyway, or compared to a few clock cycles spent on juggling the 64-bit integer addresses in 32-bit parts.
I only watched a small part of the video but it does sound confusing that the instructor would talk about limits in hard drive size in the context of word size and memory addressing.
Commonly used file systems at the time (at least FAT) did have limitations on volume size — 2 GB or 4 GB for FAT16 — and BIOS implementations also often had some kinds of limits for drive capacity. Those limits are the result of design limits of the addressing used in the file systems (or entire disk or partition handling routines) one way or the other. The limits may have nothing to do with CPU word size, though. The limits could have just as well come from the desire to save memory by using smaller address sizes or, more likely, just not seeing the need for future-proofing.
Word size places a more meaningful limit on memory (RAM) addressing because having to process integers/addresses larger than a single register for every memory access instruction comes with a much higher cost than doing it for the hard disk accesses.
TLDR: Coincidence, probably.
A pointer isn’t part of computer architecture per se, it is a programming language feature. For example the Windows API defines its own types of pointers and how large they are. In C on Windows, a pointer to a char (char*
) varies between 32 and 64 bits depending on your version. The size of a word may have little to do with it.
Word is a very overloaded word, ahem, term. In CPU architecture a word can refer to the size of an instruction, the data bus, the memory bus, etc. In the Windows API a word is an unsigned short, i.e. at least 2 bytes, and thus depends on how shorts are implemented.
There may be a correlation between MS words and instruction size words, but I think you’d need an OS developer to debate that, and I doubt it will affect the size of pointers.
This is one of those terms that can mean different things depending upon who you ask and the context in which it is asked.
Usually a processor’s word size is defined as the largest size integer which it can operate on with a single arithmetic instruction. For example, 64 bit computer can add or subtract 64 bits with a single instruction. But that same computer may be able to operate on bytes, 16 bit words, and 32 bit longwords.
Don’t equate the memory path with the computer’s word size. Often data is moved into and out of cache in a fixed size block that is a multiple of the computer’s word size. A 64 bit CPU has 8, 8 bit bytes per word but might use a 64 byte cache line and move data into and out of memory in cache block chunks, even if the CPU is only accessing 1 byte of the cache block. OR conversely, the data path to memory could be smaller, as the case with the old 8088 CPU. It used 16 bit CPU registers and did 16 bit arithmetic, but had an 8 bit data bus. It had to do 2 memory transfers to load or store a register.
And then there are fixed definitions for a word size, for example…
DEC had a problem with just saying WORD especially on VAX architecture, mostly because the company had built so many different computers with different natural word sizes (9, 18, 36, 12, 16, 32 and 64 that I can think of) and the VAX was capable of working with a large variety of data sizes. So they decided to define terms like WORD to have more definite meanings.
Byte = 8 bits,
Word = 16 bits,
Longword = 32 bits,
Quadword = 64 bits,
Octaword = 128 bits
This took much of the confusion out of discussions when a processor was capable of handling multiple different data sizes.
edit — I didn’t really address this part of the question:
«And you have a data bus that can pick up 4 contiguous memory locations, bytes, at a time. So I suppose if the CPU wanted address 0, then it’d pick up address #0,#1,#2,#3 And if the CPU wanted address 1, then it’d pick up #1,#2#,3#,#4»
Not usually.
IF a 64 bit computer is capable of addressing Longwords on a byte boundary, normally the system would load the cache block containing the address 0 from memory into cache. Often that will be on a multiple word cache size. So in the example I gave with a 64 byte cache line, the hardware would move the first 64 bytes into cache as a chunk. The CPU would then access the bytes from cache as you describe (well sort of, it may have to shift bytes to get them loaded correctly). If the longword you attempted to load spanned 2 cache blocks, the hardware would have to load 2 cache blocks (128 bytes) to access the 4 you were interested in. Or in the example you gave with a 32 bit data bus, it would have to load 64 bits (2 lines) to get the 32 that you want. If possible, it’s best to align data on its natural boundary to avoid this and other data manipulations required to deal with unaligned data.