What is the meaning of the word universe

Universe

Hubble ultra deep field.jpg

The Hubble Ultra-Deep Field image shows some of the most remote galaxies visible to present technology (diagonal is ~1/10 apparent Moon diameter)[1]

Age (within ΛCDM model) 13.787 ± 0.020 billion years[2]
Diameter Unknown.[3] Observable universe: 8.8×1026 m (28.5 Gpc or 93 Gly)[4]
Mass (ordinary matter) At least 1053 kg[5]
Average density (with energy) 9.9×10−27 kg/m3[6]
Average temperature 2.72548 K (−270.4 °C, −454.8 °F)[7]
Main contents Ordinary (baryonic) matter (4.9%)
Dark matter (26.8%)
Dark energy (68.3%)[8]
Shape Flat with 4‰ error margin[9]

The universe is all of space and time[a] and their contents,[10] including planets, stars, galaxies, and all other forms of matter and energy. The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological description of the development of the universe. According to this theory, space and time emerged together 13.787±0.020 billion years ago,[11] and the universe has been expanding ever since the Big Bang. While the spatial size of the entire universe is unknown,[3] it is possible to measure the size of the observable universe, which is approximately 93 billion light-years in diameter at the present day.

Some of the earliest cosmological models of the universe were developed by ancient Greek and Indian philosophers and were geocentric, placing Earth at the center.[12][13] Over the centuries, more precise astronomical observations led Nicolaus Copernicus to develop the heliocentric model with the Sun at the center of the Solar System. In developing the law of universal gravitation, Isaac Newton built upon Copernicus’s work as well as Johannes Kepler’s laws of planetary motion and observations by Tycho Brahe.

Further observational improvements led to the realization that the Sun is one of a few hundred billion stars in the Milky Way, which is one of a few hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe. Many of the stars in a galaxy have planets. At the largest scale, galaxies are distributed uniformly and the same in all directions, meaning that the universe has neither an edge nor a center. At smaller scales, galaxies are distributed in clusters and superclusters which form immense filaments and voids in space, creating a vast foam-like structure.[14] Discoveries in the early 20th century have suggested that the universe had a beginning and that space has been expanding since then[15] at an increasing rate.[16]

According to the Big Bang theory, the energy and matter initially present have become less dense as the universe expanded. After an initial accelerated expansion called the inflationary epoch at around 10−32 seconds, and the separation of the four known fundamental forces, the universe gradually cooled and continued to expand, allowing the first subatomic particles and simple atoms to form. Dark matter gradually gathered, forming a foam-like structure of filaments and voids under the influence of gravity. Giant clouds of hydrogen and helium were gradually drawn to the places where dark matter was most dense, forming the first galaxies, stars, and everything else seen today.

From studying the movement of galaxies, it has been discovered that the universe contains much more matter than is accounted for by visible objects; stars, galaxies, nebulas and interstellar gas. This unseen matter is known as dark matter[17] (dark means that there is a wide range of strong indirect evidence that it exists, but we have not yet detected it directly). The ΛCDM model is the most widely accepted model of the universe. It suggests that about 69.2%±1.2% of the mass and energy in the universe is dark energy which is responsible for the acceleration of the expansion of space, and about 25.8%±1.1% is dark matter.[18] Ordinary (‘baryonic’) matter is therefore only 4.84%±0.1% of the physical universe.[18] Stars, planets, and visible gas clouds only form about 6% of the ordinary matter.[19]

There are many competing hypotheses about the ultimate fate of the universe and about what, if anything, preceded the Big Bang, while other physicists and philosophers refuse to speculate, doubting that information about prior states will ever be accessible. Some physicists have suggested various multiverse hypotheses, in which our universe might be one among many universes that likewise exist.[3][20][21]

Definition

The physical universe is defined as all of space and time[a] (collectively referred to as spacetime) and their contents.[10] Such contents comprise all of energy in its various forms, including electromagnetic radiation and matter, and therefore planets, moons, stars, galaxies, and the contents of intergalactic space.[22][23][24] The universe also includes the physical laws that influence energy and matter, such as conservation laws, classical mechanics, and relativity.[25]

The universe is often defined as «the totality of existence», or everything that exists, everything that has existed, and everything that will exist.[25] In fact, some philosophers and scientists support the inclusion of ideas and abstract concepts—such as mathematics and logic—in the definition of the universe.[27][28][29] The word universe may also refer to concepts such as the cosmos, the world, and nature.[30][31]

Etymology

The word universe derives from the Old French word univers, which in turn derives from the Latin word universum.[32] The Latin word was used by Cicero and later Latin authors in many of the same senses as the modern English word is used.[33]

Synonyms

A term for universe among the ancient Greek philosophers from Pythagoras onwards was τὸ πᾶν (tò pân) ‘the all’, defined as all matter and all space, and τὸ ὅλον (tò hólon) ‘all things’, which did not necessarily include the void.[34][35] Another synonym was ὁ κόσμος (ho kósmos) meaning ‘the world, the cosmos’.[36] Synonyms are also found in Latin authors (totum, mundus, natura)[37] and survive in modern languages, e.g., the German words Das All, Weltall, and Natur for universe. The same synonyms are found in English, such as everything (as in the theory of everything), the cosmos (as in cosmology), the world (as in the many-worlds interpretation), and nature (as in natural laws or natural philosophy).[38]

Chronology and the Big Bang

The prevailing model for the evolution of the universe is the Big Bang theory.[39][40] The Big Bang model states that the earliest state of the universe was an extremely hot and dense one, and that the universe subsequently expanded and cooled. The model is based on general relativity and on simplifying assumptions such as the homogeneity and isotropy of space. A version of the model with a cosmological constant (Lambda) and cold dark matter, known as the Lambda-CDM model, is the simplest model that provides a reasonably good account of various observations about the universe. The Big Bang model accounts for observations such as the correlation of distance and redshift of galaxies, the ratio of the number of hydrogen to helium atoms, and the microwave radiation background.

In this schematic diagram, time passes from left to right, with the universe represented by a disk-shaped «slice» at any given time. Time and size are not to scale. To make the early stages visible, the time to the afterglow stage (really the first 0.003%) is stretched and the subsequent expansion (really by 1,100 times to the present) is largely suppressed.

The initial hot, dense state is called the Planck epoch, a brief period extending from time zero to one Planck time unit of approximately 10−43 seconds. During the Planck epoch, all types of matter and all types of energy were concentrated into a dense state, and gravity—currently the weakest by far of the four known forces—is believed to have been as strong as the other fundamental forces, and all the forces may have been unified. The physics controlling this very early period (including quantum gravity in the Planck epoch) is not understood, so we cannot say what, if anything, happened before time zero. Since the Planck epoch, space has been expanding to its present scale, with a very short but intense period of cosmic inflation speculated to have occurred within the first 10−32 seconds.[41] This was a kind of expansion different from those we can see around us today. Objects in space did not physically move; instead the metric that defines space itself changed. Although objects in spacetime cannot move faster than the speed of light, this limitation does not apply to the metric governing spacetime itself. This initial period of inflation would explain why space appears to be very flat, and much larger than light could travel since the start of the universe.

Within the first fraction of a second of the universe’s existence, the four fundamental forces had separated. As the universe continued to cool down from its inconceivably hot state, various types of subatomic particles were able to form in short periods of time known as the quark epoch, the hadron epoch, and the lepton epoch. Together, these epochs encompassed less than 10 seconds of time following the Big Bang. These elementary particles associated stably into ever larger combinations, including stable protons and neutrons, which then formed more complex atomic nuclei through nuclear fusion. This process, known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis, only lasted for about 17 minutes and ended about 20 minutes after the Big Bang, so only the fastest and simplest reactions occurred. About 25% of the protons and all the neutrons in the universe, by mass, were converted to helium, with small amounts of deuterium (a form of hydrogen) and traces of lithium. Any other element was only formed in very tiny quantities. The other 75% of the protons remained unaffected, as hydrogen nuclei.[42][43]: 27–42 

After nucleosynthesis ended, the universe entered a period known as the photon epoch. During this period, the universe was still far too hot for matter to form neutral atoms, so it contained a hot, dense, foggy plasma of negatively charged electrons, neutral neutrinos and positive nuclei. After about 377,000 years, the universe had cooled enough that electrons and nuclei could form the first stable atoms. This is known as recombination for historical reasons; in fact electrons and nuclei were combining for the first time. Unlike plasma, neutral atoms are transparent to many wavelengths of light, so for the first time the universe also became transparent. The photons released («decoupled») when these atoms formed can still be seen today; they form the cosmic microwave background (CMB).[43]: 15–27 

As the universe expands, the energy density of electromagnetic radiation decreases more quickly than does that of matter because the energy of a photon decreases with its wavelength. At around 47,000 years, the energy density of matter became larger than that of photons and neutrinos, and began to dominate the large scale behavior of the universe. This marked the end of the radiation-dominated era and the start of the matter-dominated era.[44]: 390 

In the earliest stages of the universe, tiny fluctuations within the universe’s density led to concentrations of dark matter gradually forming. Ordinary matter, attracted to these by gravity, formed large gas clouds and eventually, stars and galaxies, where the dark matter was most dense, and voids where it was least dense. After around 100 – 300 million years,[44]: 333  the first stars formed, known as Population III stars. These were probably very massive, luminous, non metallic and short-lived. They were responsible for the gradual reionization of the universe between about 200–500 million years and 1 billion years, and also for seeding the universe with elements heavier than helium, through stellar nucleosynthesis.[45] The universe also contains a mysterious energy—possibly a scalar field—called dark energy, the density of which does not change over time. After about 9.8 billion years, the universe had expanded sufficiently so that the density of matter was less than the density of dark energy, marking the beginning of the present dark-energy-dominated era.[46] In this era, the expansion of the universe is accelerating due to dark energy.

Physical properties

Of the four fundamental interactions, gravitation is the dominant at astronomical length scales. Gravity’s effects are cumulative; by contrast, the effects of positive and negative charges tend to cancel one another, making electromagnetism relatively insignificant on astronomical length scales. The remaining two interactions, the weak and strong nuclear forces, decline very rapidly with distance; their effects are confined mainly to sub-atomic length scales.[47]: 1470 

The universe appears to have much more matter than antimatter, an asymmetry possibly related to the CP violation.[48] This imbalance between matter and antimatter is partially responsible for the existence of all matter existing today, since matter and antimatter, if equally produced at the Big Bang, would have completely annihilated each other and left only photons as a result of their interaction.[49] The universe also appears to have neither net momentum nor angular momentum, which follows accepted physical laws if the universe is finite. These laws are Gauss’s law and the non-divergence of the stress–energy–momentum pseudotensor.[50]

Size and regions

According to the general theory of relativity, far regions of space may never interact with ours even in the lifetime of the universe due to the finite speed of light and the ongoing expansion of space. For example, radio messages sent from Earth may never reach some regions of space, even if the universe were to exist forever: space may expand faster than light can traverse it.[51]

The spatial region that can be observed with telescopes is called the observable universe, which depends on the location of the observer.
The proper distance—the distance as would be measured at a specific time, including the present—between Earth and the edge of the observable universe is 46 billion light-years[52] (14 billion parsecs), making the diameter of the observable universe about 93 billion light-years (28 billion parsecs).[52] The distance the light from the edge of the observable universe has travelled is very close to the age of the universe times the speed of light, 13.8 billion light-years (4.2×109 pc), but this does not represent the distance at any given time because the edge of the observable universe and the Earth have since moved further apart.[53] For comparison, the diameter of a typical galaxy is 30,000 light-years (9,198 parsecs), and the typical distance between two neighboring galaxies is 3 million light-years (919.8 kiloparsecs).[54] As an example, the Milky Way is roughly 100,000–180,000 light-years in diameter,[55][56] and the nearest sister galaxy to the Milky Way, the Andromeda Galaxy, is located roughly 2.5 million light-years away.[57]

Because we cannot observe space beyond the edge of the observable universe, it is unknown whether the size of the universe in its totality is finite or infinite.[3][58][59] Estimates suggest that the whole universe, if finite, must be more than 250 times larger than a Hubble sphere.[60] Some disputed[61] estimates for the total size of the universe, if finite, reach as high as 10^{10^{10^{122}}} megaparsecs, as implied by a suggested resolution of the No-Boundary Proposal.[62][b]

Age and expansion

Assuming that the Lambda-CDM model is correct, the measurements of the parameters using a variety of techniques by numerous experiments yield a best value of the age of the universe at 13.799 ± 0.021 billion years, as of 2015.[2]

Astronomers have discovered stars in the Milky Way galaxy that are almost 13.6 billion years old.

Over time, the universe and its contents have evolved; for example, the relative population of quasars and galaxies has changed[63] and space itself has expanded. Due to this expansion, scientists on Earth can observe the light from a galaxy 30 billion light-years away even though that light has traveled for only 13 billion years; the very space between them has expanded. This expansion is consistent with the observation that the light from distant galaxies has been redshifted; the photons emitted have been stretched to longer wavelengths and lower frequency during their journey. Analyses of Type Ia supernovae indicate that the spatial expansion is accelerating.[64][65]

The more matter there is in the universe, the stronger the mutual gravitational pull of the matter. If the universe were too dense then it would re-collapse into a gravitational singularity. However, if the universe contained too little matter then the self-gravity would be too weak for astronomical structures, like galaxies or planets, to form. Since the Big Bang, the universe has expanded monotonically. Perhaps unsurprisingly, our universe has just the right mass–energy density, equivalent to about 5 protons per cubic metre, which has allowed it to expand for the last 13.8 billion years, giving time to form the universe as observed today.[66][67]

There are dynamical forces acting on the particles in the universe which affect the expansion rate. Before 1998, it was expected that the expansion rate would be decreasing as time went on due to the influence of gravitational interactions in the universe; and thus there is an additional observable quantity in the universe called the deceleration parameter, which most cosmologists expected to be positive and related to the matter density of the universe. In 1998, the deceleration parameter was measured by two different groups to be negative, approximately −0.55, which technically implies that the second derivative of the cosmic scale factor {displaystyle {ddot {a}}} has been positive in the last 5–6 billion years.[16][68]

Spacetime

Modern physics regards events as being organized into spacetime.[69] This idea originated with the special theory of relativity, which predicts that if one observer sees two events happening in different places at the same time, a second observer who is moving relative to the first will be see those events happening at different times.[70]: 45–52  The two observers will disagree on the time T between the events, and they will disagree about the distance D separating the events, but they will agree on the speed of light c, and they will measure the same value for the combination {displaystyle c^{2}T^{2}-D^{2}}.[70]: 80  The square root of the absolute value of this quantity is called the interval between the two events. The interval expresses how widely separated events are, not just in space or in time, but in the combined setting of spacetime.[70]: 84, 136 [71]

The special theory of relativity cannot account for gravity. Its successor, the general theory of relativity, explains gravity by recognizing that spacetime is not fixed but instead dynamical. In general relativity, gravitational force is reimagined as curvature of spacetime. A curved path like an orbit is not the result of a force deflecting a body from an ideal straight-line path, but rather the body’s attempt to fall freely through a background that is itself curved by the presence of other masses. A remark by John Archibald Wheeler that has become proverbial among physicists summarizes the theory: «Spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve.»[72][73] (The Newtonian theory of gravity is a good approximation to the predictions of general relativity when gravitational effects are weak and objects are moving slowly compared to the speed of light.[74]: 327 [75]) The relation between matter distribution and spacetime curvature is given by the Einstein field equations, which require tensor calculus to express.[76]: 43 [77] The solutions to these equations include not only the spacetime of special relativity, Minkowski spacetime, but also Schwarzschild spacetimes, which describe black holes; FLRW spacetime, which describes an expanding universe; and more.

The universe appears to be a smooth spacetime continuum consisting of three spatial dimensions and one temporal (time) dimension. Therefore, an event in the spacetime of the physical universe can therefore be identified by a set of four coordinates: (x, y, z, t). On average, space is observed to be very nearly flat (with a curvature close to zero), meaning that Euclidean geometry is empirically true with high accuracy throughout most of the Universe.[78] Spacetime also appears to have a simply connected topology, in analogy with a sphere, at least on the length scale of the observable universe. However, present observations cannot exclude the possibilities that the universe has more dimensions (which is postulated by theories such as the string theory) and that its spacetime may have a multiply connected global topology, in analogy with the cylindrical or toroidal topologies of two-dimensional spaces.[79][80]

Shape

The three possible options for the shape of the universe

General relativity describes how spacetime is curved and bent by mass and energy (gravity). The topology or geometry of the universe includes both local geometry in the observable universe and global geometry. Cosmologists often work with a given space-like slice of spacetime called the comoving coordinates. The section of spacetime which can be observed is the backward light cone, which delimits the cosmological horizon. The cosmological horizon (also called the particle horizon or the light horizon) is the maximum distance from which particles can have traveled to the observer in the age of the universe. This horizon represents the boundary between the observable and the unobservable regions of the universe.[81][82] The existence, properties, and significance of a cosmological horizon depend on the particular cosmological model.

An important parameter determining the future evolution of the universe theory is the density parameter, Omega (Ω), defined as the average matter density of the universe divided by a critical value of that density. This selects one of three possible geometries depending on whether Ω is equal to, less than, or greater than 1. These are called, respectively, the flat, open and closed universes.[83]

Observations, including the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE), Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and Planck maps of the CMB, suggest that the universe is infinite in extent with a finite age, as described by the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) models.[84][79][85][86] These FLRW models thus support inflationary models and the standard model of cosmology, describing a flat, homogeneous universe presently dominated by dark matter and dark energy.[87][88]

Support of life

The fine-tuned universe hypothesis is the proposition that the conditions that allow the existence of observable life in the universe can only occur when certain universal fundamental physical constants lie within a very narrow range of values. According to this hypothesis, if any of several fundamental constants were only slightly different, the universe would have been unlikely to be conducive to the establishment and development of matter, astronomical structures, elemental diversity, or life as it is understood. Whether this is true, and whether that question is even logically meaningful to ask, are subjects of much debate.[89] The proposition is discussed among philosophers, scientists, theologians, and proponents of creationism.[90]

Composition

The universe is composed almost completely of dark energy, dark matter, and ordinary matter. Other contents are electromagnetic radiation (estimated to constitute from 0.005% to close to 0.01% of the total mass-energy of the universe) and antimatter.[91][92][93]

The proportions of all types of matter and energy have changed over the history of the universe.[94] The total amount of electromagnetic radiation generated within the universe has decreased by 1/2 in the past 2 billion years.[95][96] Today, ordinary matter, which includes atoms, stars, galaxies, and life, accounts for only 4.9% of the contents of the Universe.[8] The present overall density of this type of matter is very low, roughly 4.5 × 10−31 grams per cubic centimetre, corresponding to a density of the order of only one proton for every four cubic metres of volume.[6] The nature of both dark energy and dark matter is unknown. Dark matter, a mysterious form of matter that has not yet been identified, accounts for 26.8% of the cosmic contents. Dark energy, which is the energy of empty space and is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate, accounts for the remaining 68.3% of the contents.[8][97][98]

The formation of clusters and large-scale filaments in the cold dark matter model with dark energy. The frames show the evolution of structures in a 43 million parsecs (or 140 million light-years) box from redshift of 30 to the present epoch (upper left z=30 to lower right z=0).

A map of the superclusters and voids nearest to Earth

Matter, dark matter, and dark energy are distributed homogeneously throughout the universe over length scales longer than 300 million light-years or so.[99] However, over shorter length-scales, matter tends to clump hierarchically; many atoms are condensed into stars, most stars into galaxies, most galaxies into clusters, superclusters and, finally, large-scale galactic filaments. The observable universe contains as many as 200 billion galaxies[100][101] and, overall, as many as an estimated 1×1024 stars[102][103] (more stars than all the grains of sand on planet Earth).[104] Typical galaxies range from dwarfs with as few as ten million[105] (107) stars up to giants with one trillion[106] (1012) stars. Between the larger structures are voids, which are typically 10–150 Mpc (33 million–490 million ly) in diameter. The Milky Way is in the Local Group of galaxies, which in turn is in the Laniakea Supercluster.[107] This supercluster spans over 500 million light-years, while the Local Group spans over 10 million light-years.[108] The Universe also has vast regions of relative emptiness; the largest known void measures 1.8 billion ly (550 Mpc) across.[109]

Comparison of the contents of the universe today to 380,000 years after the Big Bang as measured with 5 year WMAP data (from 2008).[110] (Due to rounding errors, the sum of these numbers is not 100%). This reflects the 2008 limits of WMAP’s ability to define dark matter and dark energy.

The observable universe is isotropic on scales significantly larger than superclusters, meaning that the statistical properties of the universe are the same in all directions as observed from Earth. The universe is bathed in highly isotropic microwave radiation that corresponds to a thermal equilibrium blackbody spectrum of roughly 2.72548 kelvins.[7] The hypothesis that the large-scale universe is homogeneous and isotropic is known as the cosmological principle.[111] A universe that is both homogeneous and isotropic looks the same from all vantage points[112] and has no center.[113]

Dark energy

An explanation for why the expansion of the universe is accelerating remains elusive. It is often attributed to «dark energy», an unknown form of energy that is hypothesized to permeate space.[114] On a mass–energy equivalence basis, the density of dark energy (~ 7 × 10−30 g/cm3) is much less than the density of ordinary matter or dark matter within galaxies. However, in the present dark-energy era, it dominates the mass–energy of the universe because it is uniform across space.[115][116]

Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological constant, a constant energy density filling space homogeneously,[117] and scalar fields such as quintessence or moduli, dynamic quantities whose energy density can vary in time and space. Contributions from scalar fields that are constant in space are usually also included in the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant can be formulated to be equivalent to vacuum energy. Scalar fields having only a slight amount of spatial inhomogeneity would be difficult to distinguish from a cosmological constant.

Dark matter

Dark matter is a hypothetical kind of matter that is invisible to the entire electromagnetic spectrum, but which accounts for most of the matter in the universe. The existence and properties of dark matter are inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, radiation, and the large-scale structure of the universe. Other than neutrinos, a form of hot dark matter, dark matter has not been detected directly, making it one of the greatest mysteries in modern astrophysics. Dark matter neither emits nor absorbs light or any other electromagnetic radiation at any significant level. Dark matter is estimated to constitute 26.8% of the total mass–energy and 84.5% of the total matter in the universe.[97][118]

Ordinary matter

The remaining 4.9% of the mass–energy of the universe is ordinary matter, that is, atoms, ions, electrons and the objects they form. This matter includes stars, which produce nearly all of the light we see from galaxies, as well as interstellar gas in the interstellar and intergalactic media, planets, and all the objects from everyday life that we can bump into, touch or squeeze.[119] As a matter of fact, the great majority of ordinary matter in the universe is unseen, since visible stars and gas inside galaxies and clusters account for less than 10 per cent of the ordinary matter contribution to the mass-energy density of the universe.[120][121][122]

Ordinary matter commonly exists in four states (or phases): solid, liquid, gas, and plasma.[123] However, advances in experimental techniques have revealed other previously theoretical phases, such as Bose–Einstein condensates and fermionic condensates.[124][125]

Ordinary matter is composed of two types of elementary particles: quarks and leptons.[126] For example, the proton is formed of two up quarks and one down quark; the neutron is formed of two down quarks and one up quark; and the electron is a kind of lepton. An atom consists of an atomic nucleus, made up of protons and neutrons, and electrons that orbit the nucleus.[47]: 1476  Because most of the mass of an atom is concentrated in its nucleus, which is made up of baryons, astronomers often use the term baryonic matter to describe ordinary matter, although a small fraction of this «baryonic matter» is electrons.

Soon after the Big Bang, primordial protons and neutrons formed from the quark–gluon plasma of the early universe as it cooled below two trillion degrees. A few minutes later, in a process known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis, nuclei formed from the primordial protons and neutrons. This nucleosynthesis formed lighter elements, those with small atomic numbers up to lithium and beryllium, but the abundance of heavier elements dropped off sharply with increasing atomic number. Some boron may have been formed at this time, but the next heavier element, carbon, was not formed in significant amounts. Big Bang nucleosynthesis shut down after about 20 minutes due to the rapid drop in temperature and density of the expanding universe. Subsequent formation of heavier elements resulted from stellar nucleosynthesis and supernova nucleosynthesis.[127]

Particles

A four-by-four table of particles. Columns are three generations of matter (fermions) and one of forces (bosons). In the first three columns, two rows contain quarks and two leptons. The top two rows' columns contain up (u) and down (d) quarks, charm (c) and strange (s) quarks, top (t) and bottom (b) quarks, and photon (γ) and gluon (g), respectively. The bottom two rows' columns contain electron neutrino (ν sub e) and electron (e), muon neutrino (ν sub μ) and muon (μ), and tau neutrino (ν sub τ) and tau (τ), and Z sup 0 and W sup ± weak force. Mass, charge, and spin are listed for each particle.

Standard model of elementary particles: the 12 fundamental fermions and 4 fundamental bosons. Brown loops indicate which bosons (red) couple to which fermions (purple and green). Columns are three generations of matter (fermions) and one of forces (bosons). In the first three columns, two rows contain quarks and two leptons. The top two rows’ columns contain up (u) and down (d) quarks, charm (c) and strange (s) quarks, top (t) and bottom (b) quarks, and photon (γ) and gluon (g), respectively. The bottom two rows’ columns contain electron neutrino (νe) and electron (e), muon neutrino (νμ) and muon (μ), tau neutrino (ντ) and tau (τ), and the Z0 and W± carriers of the weak force. Mass, charge, and spin are listed for each particle.

Ordinary matter and the forces that act on matter can be described in terms of elementary particles.[128] These particles are sometimes described as being fundamental, since they have an unknown substructure, and it is unknown whether or not they are composed of smaller and even more fundamental particles.[129][130] All elementary particles are currently best explained by quantum mechanics and exhibit wave–particle duality: their behavior has both particle-like and wave-like aspects, with different features dominating under different circumstances.[131] Of central importance is the Standard Model, a theory that is concerned with electromagnetic interactions and the weak and strong nuclear interactions.[132] The Standard Model is supported by the experimental confirmation of the existence of particles that compose matter: quarks and leptons, and their corresponding «antimatter» duals, as well as the force particles that mediate interactions: the photon, the W and Z bosons, and the gluon.[129] The Standard Model predicted the existence of the recently discovered Higgs boson, a particle that is a manifestation of a field within the universe that can endow particles with mass.[133][134] Because of its success in explaining a wide variety of experimental results, the Standard Model is sometimes regarded as a «theory of almost everything».[132] The Standard Model does not, however, accommodate gravity. A true force–particle «theory of everything» has not been attained.[135]

Hadrons

A hadron is a composite particle made of quarks held together by the strong force. Hadrons are categorized into two families: baryons (such as protons and neutrons) made of three quarks, and mesons (such as pions) made of one quark and one antiquark. Of the hadrons, protons are stable, and neutrons bound within atomic nuclei are stable. Other hadrons are unstable under ordinary conditions and are thus insignificant constituents of the modern universe.[136]: 118–123  From approximately 10−6 seconds after the Big Bang, during a period known as the hadron epoch, the temperature of the universe had fallen sufficiently to allow quarks to bind together into hadrons, and the mass of the universe was dominated by hadrons. Initially, the temperature was high enough to allow the formation of hadron–anti-hadron pairs, which kept matter and antimatter in thermal equilibrium. However, as the temperature of the universe continued to fall, hadron–anti-hadron pairs were no longer produced. Most of the hadrons and anti-hadrons were then eliminated in particle–antiparticle annihilation reactions, leaving a small residual of hadrons by the time the universe was about one second old.[136]: 244–66 

Leptons

A lepton is an elementary, half-integer spin particle that does not undergo strong interactions but is subject to the Pauli exclusion principle; no two leptons of the same species can be in exactly the same state at the same time.[137] Two main classes of leptons exist: charged leptons (also known as the electron-like leptons), and neutral leptons (better known as neutrinos). Electrons are stable and the most common charged lepton in the universe, whereas muons and taus are unstable particles that quickly decay after being produced in high energy collisions, such as those involving cosmic rays or carried out in particle accelerators.[138][139] Charged leptons can combine with other particles to form various composite particles such as atoms and positronium. The electron governs nearly all of chemistry, as it is found in atoms and is directly tied to all chemical properties. Neutrinos rarely interact with anything, and are consequently rarely observed. Neutrinos stream throughout the universe but rarely interact with normal matter.[140]

The lepton epoch was the period in the evolution of the early universe in which the leptons dominated the mass of the universe. It started roughly 1 second after the Big Bang, after the majority of hadrons and anti-hadrons annihilated each other at the end of the hadron epoch. During the lepton epoch the temperature of the universe was still high enough to create lepton–anti-lepton pairs, so leptons and anti-leptons were in thermal equilibrium. Approximately 10 seconds after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe had fallen to the point where lepton–anti-lepton pairs were no longer created.[141] Most leptons and anti-leptons were then eliminated in annihilation reactions, leaving a small residue of leptons. The mass of the universe was then dominated by photons as it entered the following photon epoch.[142][143]

Photons

A photon is the quantum of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation. It is the carrier for the electromagnetic force. The effects of this force are easily observable at the microscopic and at the macroscopic level because the photon has zero rest mass; this allows long distance interactions.[47]: 1470 

The photon epoch started after most leptons and anti-leptons were annihilated at the end of the lepton epoch, about 10 seconds after the Big Bang. Atomic nuclei were created in the process of nucleosynthesis which occurred during the first few minutes of the photon epoch. For the remainder of the photon epoch the universe contained a hot dense plasma of nuclei, electrons and photons. About 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the temperature of the Universe fell to the point where nuclei could combine with electrons to create neutral atoms. As a result, photons no longer interacted frequently with matter and the universe became transparent. The highly redshifted photons from this period form the cosmic microwave background. Tiny variations in temperature and density detectable in the CMB were the early «seeds» from which all subsequent structure formation took place.[136]: 244–66 

Cosmological models

Model of the universe based on general relativity

General relativity is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915 and the current description of gravitation in modern physics. It is the basis of current cosmological models of the universe. General relativity generalizes special relativity and Newton’s law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time, or spacetime. In particular, the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present. The relation is specified by the Einstein field equations, a system of partial differential equations. In general relativity, the distribution of matter and energy determines the geometry of spacetime, which in turn describes the acceleration of matter. Therefore, solutions of the Einstein field equations describe the evolution of the universe. Combined with measurements of the amount, type, and distribution of matter in the universe, the equations of general relativity describe the evolution of the universe over time.[144]

With the assumption of the cosmological principle that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic everywhere, a specific solution of the field equations that describes the universe is the metric tensor called the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric,

ds^{2}=-c^{2}dt^{2}+R(t)^{2}left({frac {dr^{2}}{1-kr^{2}}}+r^{2}dtheta ^{2}+r^{2}sin ^{2}theta ,dphi ^{2}right)

where (r, θ, φ) correspond to a spherical coordinate system. This metric has only two undetermined parameters. An overall dimensionless length scale factor R describes the size scale of the universe as a function of time (an increase in R is the expansion of the universe),[145] and a curvature index k describes the geometry. The index k is defined so that it can take only one of three values: 0, corresponding to flat Euclidean geometry; 1, corresponding to a space of positive curvature; or −1, corresponding to a space of positive or negative curvature.[146] The value of R as a function of time t depends upon k and the cosmological constant Λ.[144] The cosmological constant represents the energy density of the vacuum of space and could be related to dark energy.[98] The equation describing how R varies with time is known as the Friedmann equation after its inventor, Alexander Friedmann.[147]

The solutions for R(t) depend on k and Λ, but some qualitative features of such solutions are general. First and most importantly, the length scale R of the universe can remain constant only if the universe is perfectly isotropic with positive curvature (k=1) and has one precise value of density everywhere, as first noted by Albert Einstein.[144] However, this equilibrium is unstable: because the universe is inhomogeneous on smaller scales, R must change over time. When R changes, all the spatial distances in the universe change in tandem; there is an overall expansion or contraction of space itself. This accounts for the observation that galaxies appear to be flying apart; the space between them is stretching. The stretching of space also accounts for the apparent paradox that two galaxies can be 40 billion light-years apart, although they started from the same point 13.8 billion years ago[148] and never moved faster than the speed of light.

Second, all solutions suggest that there was a gravitational singularity in the past, when R went to zero and matter and energy were infinitely dense. It may seem that this conclusion is uncertain because it is based on the questionable assumptions of perfect homogeneity and isotropy (the cosmological principle) and that only the gravitational interaction is significant. However, the Penrose–Hawking singularity theorems show that a singularity should exist for very general conditions. Hence, according to Einstein’s field equations, R grew rapidly from an unimaginably hot, dense state that existed immediately following this singularity (when R had a small, finite value); this is the essence of the Big Bang model of the universe. Understanding the singularity of the Big Bang likely requires a quantum theory of gravity, which has not yet been formulated.[149]

Third, the curvature index k determines the sign of the mean spatial curvature of spacetime[146] averaged over sufficiently large length scales (greater than about a billion light-years). If k=1, the curvature is positive and the universe has a finite volume.[150] A universe with positive curvature is often visualized as a three-dimensional sphere embedded in a four-dimensional space. Conversely, if k is zero or negative, the universe has an infinite volume.[150] It may seem counter-intuitive that an infinite and yet infinitely dense universe could be created in a single instant when R = 0, but exactly that is predicted mathematically when k does not equal 1. By analogy, an infinite plane has zero curvature but infinite area, whereas an infinite cylinder is finite in one direction and a torus is finite in both. A toroidal universe could behave like a normal universe with periodic boundary conditions.

The ultimate fate of the universe is still unknown because it depends critically on the curvature index k and the cosmological constant Λ. If the universe were sufficiently dense, k would equal +1, meaning that its average curvature throughout is positive and the universe will eventually recollapse in a Big Crunch,[151] possibly starting a new universe in a Big Bounce. Conversely, if the universe were insufficiently dense, k would equal 0 or −1 and the universe would expand forever, cooling off and eventually reaching the Big Freeze and the heat death of the universe.[144] Modern data suggests that the rate of expansion of the universe is not decreasing, as originally expected, but increasing; if this continues indefinitely, the universe may eventually reach a Big Rip. Observationally, the universe appears to be flat (k = 0), with an overall density that is very close to the critical value between recollapse and eternal expansion.[152]

Multiverse hypotheses

Some speculative theories have proposed that our universe is but one of a set of disconnected universes, collectively denoted as the multiverse, challenging or enhancing more limited definitions of the universe.[20][153] Scientific multiverse models are distinct from concepts such as alternate planes of consciousness and simulated reality.

Max Tegmark developed a four-part classification scheme for the different types of multiverses that scientists have suggested in response to various problems in physics. An example of such multiverses is the one resulting from the chaotic inflation model of the early universe.[154] Another is the multiverse resulting from the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. In this interpretation, parallel worlds are generated in a manner similar to quantum superposition and decoherence, with all states of the wave functions being realized in separate worlds. Effectively, in the many-worlds interpretation the multiverse evolves as a universal wavefunction. If the Big Bang that created our multiverse created an ensemble of multiverses, the wave function of the ensemble would be entangled in this sense.[155] Whether scientifically meaningful probabilities can be extracted from this picture has been and continues to be a topic of much debate, and multiple versions of the many-worlds interpretation exist.[156][157][158] (The subject of the interpretation of quantum mechanics is in general marked by disagreement.[159][160][161])

The least controversial, but still highly disputed, category of multiverse in Tegmark’s scheme is Level I. The multiverses of this level are composed by distant spacetime events «in our own universe». Tegmark and others[162] have argued that, if space is infinite, or sufficiently large and uniform, identical instances of the history of Earth’s entire Hubble volume occur every so often, simply by chance. Tegmark calculated that our nearest so-called doppelgänger, is 1010115 metres away from us (a double exponential function larger than a googolplex).[163][164] However, the arguments used are of speculative nature.[165] Additionally, it would be impossible to scientifically verify the existence of an identical Hubble volume.

It is possible to conceive of disconnected spacetimes, each existing but unable to interact with one another.[163][166] An easily visualized metaphor of this concept is a group of separate soap bubbles, in which observers living on one soap bubble cannot interact with those on other soap bubbles, even in principle.[167] According to one common terminology, each «soap bubble» of spacetime is denoted as a universe, whereas humans’ particular spacetime is denoted as the universe,[20] just as humans call Earth’s moon the Moon. The entire collection of these separate spacetimes is denoted as the multiverse.[20] With this terminology, different universes are not causally connected to each other.[20] In principle, the other unconnected universes may have different dimensionalities and topologies of spacetime, different forms of matter and energy, and different physical laws and physical constants, although such possibilities are purely speculative.[20] Others consider each of several bubbles created as part of chaotic inflation to be separate universes, though in this model these universes all share a causal origin.[20]

Historical conceptions

Historically, there have been many ideas of the cosmos (cosmologies) and its origin (cosmogonies). Theories of an impersonal universe governed by physical laws were first proposed by the Greeks and Indians.[13] Ancient Chinese philosophy encompassed the notion of the universe including both all of space and all of time.[168] Over the centuries, improvements in astronomical observations and theories of motion and gravitation led to ever more accurate descriptions of the universe. The modern era of cosmology began with Albert Einstein’s 1915 general theory of relativity, which made it possible to quantitatively predict the origin, evolution, and conclusion of the universe as a whole. Most modern, accepted theories of cosmology are based on general relativity and, more specifically, the predicted Big Bang.[169]

Mythologies

Many cultures have stories describing the origin of the world and universe. Cultures generally regard these stories as having some truth. There are however many differing beliefs in how these stories apply amongst those believing in a supernatural origin, ranging from a god directly creating the universe as it is now to a god just setting the «wheels in motion» (for example via mechanisms such as the big bang and evolution).[170]

Ethnologists and anthropologists who study myths have developed various classification schemes for the various themes that appear in creation stories.[171][172] For example, in one type of story, the world is born from a world egg; such stories include the Finnish epic poem Kalevala, the Chinese story of Pangu or the Indian Brahmanda Purana. In related stories, the universe is created by a single entity emanating or producing something by him- or herself, as in the Tibetan Buddhism concept of Adi-Buddha, the ancient Greek story of Gaia (Mother Earth), the Aztec goddess Coatlicue myth, the ancient Egyptian god Atum story, and the Judeo-Christian Genesis creation narrative in which the Abrahamic God created the universe. In another type of story, the universe is created from the union of male and female deities, as in the Maori story of Rangi and Papa. In other stories, the universe is created by crafting it from pre-existing materials, such as the corpse of a dead god—as from Tiamat in the Babylonian epic Enuma Elish or from the giant Ymir in Norse mythology—or from chaotic materials, as in Izanagi and Izanami in Japanese mythology. In other stories, the universe emanates from fundamental principles, such as Brahman and Prakrti, the creation myth of the Serers,[173] or the yin and yang of the Tao.

Philosophical models

The pre-Socratic Greek philosophers and Indian philosophers developed some of the earliest philosophical concepts of the universe.[13][174] The earliest Greek philosophers noted that appearances can be deceiving, and sought to understand the underlying reality behind the appearances. In particular, they noted the ability of matter to change forms (e.g., ice to water to steam) and several philosophers proposed that all the physical materials in the world are different forms of a single primordial material, or arche. The first to do so was Thales, who proposed this material to be water. Thales’ student, Anaximander, proposed that everything came from the limitless apeiron. Anaximenes proposed the primordial material to be air on account of its perceived attractive and repulsive qualities that cause the arche to condense or dissociate into different forms. Anaxagoras proposed the principle of Nous (Mind), while Heraclitus proposed fire (and spoke of logos). Empedocles proposed the elements to be earth, water, air and fire. His four-element model became very popular. Like Pythagoras, Plato believed that all things were composed of number, with Empedocles’ elements taking the form of the Platonic solids. Democritus, and later philosophers—most notably Leucippus—proposed that the universe is composed of indivisible atoms moving through a void (vacuum), although Aristotle did not believe that to be feasible because air, like water, offers resistance to motion. Air will immediately rush in to fill a void, and moreover, without resistance, it would do so indefinitely fast.[13]

Although Heraclitus argued for eternal change,[175] his contemporary Parmenides emphasized changelessness. Parmenides’ poem On Nature has been read as saying that all change is an illusion, that the true underlying reality is eternally unchanging and of a single nature, or at least that the essential feature of each thing that exists must exist eternally, without origin, change, or end.[176] His student Zeno of Elea challenged everyday ideas about motion with several famous paradoxes. Aristotle responded to these paradoxes by developing the notion of a potential countable infinity, as well as the infinitely divisible continuum.[177][178] Unlike the eternal and unchanging cycles of time, he believed that the world is bounded by the celestial spheres and that cumulative stellar magnitude is only finitely multiplicative.

The Indian philosopher Kanada, founder of the Vaisheshika school, developed a notion of atomism and proposed that light and heat were varieties of the same substance.[179] In the 5th century AD, the Buddhist atomist philosopher Dignāga proposed atoms to be point-sized, durationless, and made of energy. They denied the existence of substantial matter and proposed that movement consisted of momentary flashes of a stream of energy.[180]

The notion of temporal finitism was inspired by the doctrine of creation shared by the three Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The Christian philosopher, John Philoponus, presented the philosophical arguments against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past and future. Philoponus’ arguments against an infinite past were used by the early Muslim philosopher, Al-Kindi (Alkindus); the Jewish philosopher, Saadia Gaon (Saadia ben Joseph); and the Muslim theologian, Al-Ghazali (Algazel).[181]

Astronomical concepts

3rd century BCE calculations by Aristarchus on the relative sizes of, from left to right, the Sun, Earth, and Moon, from a 10th-century AD Greek copy

The earliest written records of identifiable predecessors to modern astronomy come from Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia from around 3000 to 1200 BCE.[182][183] Babylonian astronomers of the 7th century BCE viewed the world as a flat disk surrounded by the ocean,[184][185] and this forms the premise for early Greek maps like those of Anaximander and Hecataeus of Miletus.

Later Greek philosophers, observing the motions of the heavenly bodies, were concerned with developing models of the universe based more profoundly on empirical evidence. The first coherent model was proposed by Eudoxus of Cnidos, a student of Plato who followed Plato’s idea that heavenly motions had to be circular. In order to account for the known complications of the planets’ motions, particularly retrograde movement, Eudoxus’ model included 27 different celestial spheres: four for each of the planets visible to the naked eye, three each for the Sun and the Moon, and one for the stars. All of these spheres were centered on the Earth, which remained motionless while they rotated eternally. Aristotle elaborated upon this model, increasing the number of spheres to 55 in order to account for further details of planetary motion. For Aristotle, normal matter was entirely contained within the terrestrial sphere, and it obeyed fundamentally different rules from heavenly material.[186][187]

The post-Aristotle treatise De Mundo (of uncertain authorship and date) stated, «Five elements, situated in spheres in five regions, the less being in each case surrounded by the greater—namely, earth surrounded by water, water by air, air by fire, and fire by ether—make up the whole universe».[188]

This model was also refined by Callippus and after concentric spheres were abandoned, it was brought into nearly perfect agreement with astronomical observations by Ptolemy.[189] The success of such a model is largely due to the mathematical fact that any function (such as the position of a planet) can be decomposed into a set of circular functions (the Fourier modes). Other Greek scientists, such as the Pythagorean philosopher Philolaus, postulated (according to Stobaeus’ account) that at the center of the universe was a «central fire» around which the Earth, Sun, Moon and planets revolved in uniform circular motion.[190]

The Greek astronomer Aristarchus of Samos was the first known individual to propose a heliocentric model of the universe. Though the original text has been lost, a reference in Archimedes’ book The Sand Reckoner describes Aristarchus’s heliocentric model. Archimedes wrote:

You, King Gelon, are aware the universe is the name given by most astronomers to the sphere the center of which is the center of the Earth, while its radius is equal to the straight line between the center of the Sun and the center of the Earth. This is the common account as you have heard from astronomers. But Aristarchus has brought out a book consisting of certain hypotheses, wherein it appears, as a consequence of the assumptions made, that the universe is many times greater than the universe just mentioned. His hypotheses are that the fixed stars and the Sun remain unmoved, that the Earth revolves about the Sun on the circumference of a circle, the Sun lying in the middle of the orbit, and that the sphere of fixed stars, situated about the same center as the Sun, is so great that the circle in which he supposes the Earth to revolve bears such a proportion to the distance of the fixed stars as the center of the sphere bears to its surface.[191]

Aristarchus thus believed the stars to be very far away, and saw this as the reason why stellar parallax had not been observed, that is, the stars had not been observed to move relative each other as the Earth moved around the Sun. The stars are in fact much farther away than the distance that was generally assumed in ancient times, which is why stellar parallax is only detectable with precision instruments. The geocentric model, consistent with planetary parallax, was assumed to be the explanation for the unobservability of stellar parallax.[192]

The only other astronomer from antiquity known by name who supported Aristarchus’s heliocentric model was Seleucus of Seleucia, a Hellenistic astronomer who lived a century after Aristarchus.[193][194][195] According to Plutarch, Seleucus was the first to prove the heliocentric system through reasoning, but it is not known what arguments he used. Seleucus’ arguments for a heliocentric cosmology were probably related to the phenomenon of tides.[196] According to Strabo (1.1.9), Seleucus was the first to state that the tides are due to the attraction of the Moon, and that the height of the tides depends on the Moon’s position relative to the Sun.[197] Alternatively, he may have proved heliocentricity by determining the constants of a geometric model for it, and by developing methods to compute planetary positions using this model, like what Nicolaus Copernicus later did in the 16th century.[198] During the Middle Ages, heliocentric models were also proposed by the Persian astronomers Albumasar[199] and Al-Sijzi.[200]

The Aristotelian model was accepted in the Western world for roughly two millennia, until Copernicus revived Aristarchus’s perspective that the astronomical data could be explained more plausibly if the Earth rotated on its axis and if the Sun were placed at the center of the universe.[201]

In the center rests the Sun. For who would place this lamp of a very beautiful temple in another or better place than this wherefrom it can illuminate everything at the same time?

— Nicolaus Copernicus, in Chapter 10, Book 1 of De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestrum (1543)

As noted by Copernicus himself, the notion that the Earth rotates is very old, dating at least to Philolaus (c. 450 BC), Heraclides Ponticus (c. 350 BC) and Ecphantus the Pythagorean. Roughly a century before Copernicus, the Christian scholar Nicholas of Cusa also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis in his book, On Learned Ignorance (1440).[202] Al-Sijzi[203] also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis. Empirical evidence for the Earth’s rotation on its axis, using the phenomenon of comets, was given by Tusi (1201–1274) and Ali Qushji (1403–1474).[204]

This cosmology was accepted by Isaac Newton, Christiaan Huygens and later scientists.[205] Newton demonstrated that the same laws of motion and gravity apply to earthly and to celestial matter, making Aristotle’s division between the two obsolete. Edmund Halley (1720)[206] and Jean-Philippe de Chéseaux (1744)[207] noted independently that the assumption of an infinite space filled uniformly with stars would lead to the prediction that the nighttime sky would be as bright as the Sun itself; this became known as Olbers’ paradox in the 19th century.[208] Newton believed that an infinite space uniformly filled with matter would cause infinite forces and instabilities causing the matter to be crushed inwards under its own gravity.[205] This instability was clarified in 1902 by the Jeans instability criterion.[209] One solution to these paradoxes is the Charlier Universe, in which the matter is arranged hierarchically (systems of orbiting bodies that are themselves orbiting in a larger system, ad infinitum) in a fractal way such that the universe has a negligibly small overall density; such a cosmological model had also been proposed earlier in 1761 by Johann Heinrich Lambert.[54][210]

During the 18th century, Immanuel Kant speculated that nebulae could be entire galaxies separate from the Milky Way,[206] and in 1850, Alexander von Humboldt called these separate galaxies Weltinseln, or «world islands», a term that later developed into «island universes».[211][212] In 1919, when the Hooker Telescope was completed, the prevailing view still was that the universe consisted entirely of the Milky Way Galaxy. Using the Hooker Telescope, Edwin Hubble identified Cepheid variables in several spiral nebulae and in 1922–1923 proved conclusively that Andromeda Nebula and Triangulum among others, were entire galaxies outside our own, thus proving that universe consists of a multitude of galaxies.[213]

The modern era of physical cosmology began in 1917, when Albert Einstein first applied his general theory of relativity to model the structure and dynamics of the universe.[214] The discoveries of this era, and the questions that remain unanswered, are outlined in the sections above.

Map of the observable universe with some of the notable astronomical objects known today. The scale of length increases exponentially toward the right. Celestial bodies are shown enlarged in size to be able to understand their shapes.

See also

  • Cosmic Calendar (scaled down timeline)
  • Cosmic latte
  • Detailed logarithmic timeline
  • Earth’s location in the universe
  • False vacuum
  • Future of an expanding universe
  • Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey
  • Heat death of the universe
  • History of the center of the Universe
  • Illustris project
  • Non-standard cosmology
  • Nucleocosmochronology
  • Parallel universe (fiction)
  • Rare Earth hypothesis
  • Space and survival
  • Terasecond and longer
  • Timeline of the early universe
  • Timeline of the far future
  • Timeline of the near future
  • Zero-energy universe

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b According to modern physics, particularly the theory of relativity, space and time are intrinsically linked as spacetime.
  2. ^ Although listed in megaparsecs by the cited source, this number is so vast that its digits would remain virtually unchanged for all intents and purposes regardless of which conventional units it is listed in, whether it to be nanometres or gigaparsecs, as the differences would disappear into the error.

Citations

  1. ^ «Hubble sees galaxies galore». spacetelescope.org. Archived from the original on May 4, 2017. Retrieved April 30, 2017.
  2. ^ a b Planck Collaboration (2016). «Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters». Astronomy & Astrophysics. 594: A13, Table 4. arXiv:1502.01589. Bibcode:2016A&A…594A..13P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830. S2CID 119262962.
  3. ^ a b c d Greene, Brian (2011). The Hidden Reality. Alfred A. Knopf.
  4. ^ Bars, Itzhak; Terning, John (November 2009). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-0-387-77637-8. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
  5. ^ Davies, Paul (2006). The Goldilocks Enigma. First Mariner Books. p. 43ff. ISBN 978-0-618-59226-5.
  6. ^ a b NASA/WMAP Science Team (January 24, 2014). «Universe 101: What is the Universe Made Of?». NASA. Archived from the original on March 10, 2008. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
  7. ^ a b Fixsen, D.J. (2009). «The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background». The Astrophysical Journal. 707 (2): 916–20. arXiv:0911.1955. Bibcode:2009ApJ…707..916F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916. S2CID 119217397.
  8. ^ a b c «First Planck results: the universe is still weird and interesting». Matthew Francis. Ars technica. March 21, 2013. Archived from the original on May 2, 2019. Retrieved August 21, 2015.
  9. ^ NASA/WMAP Science Team (January 24, 2014). «Universe 101: Will the Universe expand forever?». NASA. Archived from the original on March 9, 2008. Retrieved April 16, 2015.
  10. ^ a b Zeilik, Michael; Gregory, Stephen A. (1998). Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics (4th ed.). Saunders College Publishing. ISBN 978-0-03-006228-5. The totality of all space and time; all that is, has been, and will be.
  11. ^ Planck Collaboration; Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday, A. J.; Barreiro, R. B.; Bartolo, N.; Basak, S. (September 2020). «Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters». Astronomy & Astrophysics. 641: A6. arXiv:1807.06209. Bibcode:2020A&A…641A…6P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. ISSN 0004-6361. S2CID 119335614.
  12. ^ Dold-Samplonius, Yvonne (2002). From China to Paris: 2000 Years Transmission of Mathematical Ideas. Franz Steiner Verlag.
  13. ^ a b c d Glick, Thomas F.; Livesey, Steven; Wallis, Faith (2005). Medieval Science Technology and Medicine: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-96930-7. OCLC 61228669.
  14. ^ Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (July 23, 2013). An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (International ed.). Pearson. pp. 1173–74. ISBN 978-1-292-02293-2. Archived from the original on December 28, 2019. Retrieved May 16, 2018.
  15. ^ Hawking, Stephen (1988). A Brief History of Time. Bantam Books. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-553-05340-1.
  16. ^ a b «The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011». Archived from the original on April 17, 2015. Retrieved April 16, 2015.
  17. ^ Redd, Nola. «What is Dark Matter?». Space.com. Archived from the original on February 1, 2018. Retrieved February 1, 2018.
  18. ^ a b «Planck 2015 results, table 9». Archived from the original on July 27, 2018. Retrieved May 16, 2018.
  19. ^ Persic, Massimo; Salucci, Paolo (September 1, 1992). «The baryon content of the Universe». Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 258 (1): 14P–18P. arXiv:astro-ph/0502178. Bibcode:1992MNRAS.258P..14P. doi:10.1093/mnras/258.1.14P. ISSN 0035-8711. S2CID 17945298.
  20. ^ a b c d e f g Ellis, George F.R.; U. Kirchner; W.R. Stoeger (2004). «Multiverses and physical cosmology». Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 347 (3): 921–36. arXiv:astro-ph/0305292. Bibcode:2004MNRAS.347..921E. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07261.x. S2CID 119028830.
  21. ^ «‘Multiverse’ theory suggested by microwave background». BBC News. August 3, 2011. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  22. ^ «Universe». Encyclopaedia Britannica online. Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc. 2012. Archived from the original on June 9, 2021. Retrieved February 17, 2018.
  23. ^ «Universe». Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Archived from the original on October 22, 2012. Retrieved September 21, 2012.
  24. ^ «Universe». Dictionary.com. Archived from the original on October 23, 2012. Retrieved September 21, 2012.
  25. ^ a b Schreuder, Duco A. (December 3, 2014). Vision and Visual Perception. Archway Publishing. p. 135. ISBN 978-1-4808-1294-9. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  26. ^ Mermin, N. David (2004). «Could Feynman Have Said This?». Physics Today. 57 (5): 10. Bibcode:2004PhT….57e..10M. doi:10.1063/1.1768652.
  27. ^ Tegmark, Max (2008). «The Mathematical Universe». Foundations of Physics. 38 (2): 101–50. arXiv:0704.0646. Bibcode:2008FoPh…38..101T. doi:10.1007/s10701-007-9186-9. S2CID 9890455. A short version of which is available at Fixsen, D. J. (2007). «Shut up and calculate». arXiv:0709.4024 [physics.pop-ph]. in reference to David Mermin’s famous quote «shut up and calculate!»[26]
  28. ^ Holt, Jim (2012). Why Does the World Exist?. Liveright Publishing. p. 308.
  29. ^ Ferris, Timothy (1997). The Whole Shebang: A State-of-the-Universe(s) Report. Simon & Schuster. p. 400.
  30. ^ Copan, Paul; William Lane Craig (2004). Creation Out of Nothing: A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration. Baker Academic. p. 220. ISBN 978-0-8010-2733-8.
  31. ^ Bolonkin, Alexander (November 2011). Universe, Human Immortality and Future Human Evaluation. Elsevier. pp. 3–. ISBN 978-0-12-415801-6. Archived from the original on February 8, 2021. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  32. ^ The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971, p. 3518. ISBN 978-0198611172.
  33. ^ Lewis, C.T. and Short, S (1879) A Latin Dictionary, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-864201-6, pp. 1933, 1977–1978.
  34. ^ Liddell; Scott. «A Greek-English Lexicon». lsj.gr. Archived from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2022. πᾶς
  35. ^ Liddell; Scott. «A Greek-English Lexicon». lsj.gr. Archived from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2022. ὅλος
  36. ^ Liddell; Scott. «A Greek–English Lexicon». lsj.gr. Archived from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved July 30, 2022. κόσμος
  37. ^ Lewis, C.T.; Short, S (1879). A Latin Dictionary. Oxford University Press. pp. 1175, 1189–90, 1881–82. ISBN 978-0-19-864201-5.
  38. ^ The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1971. pp. 569, 909, 1900, 3821–22. ISBN 978-0-19-861117-2.
  39. ^ Silk, Joseph (2009). Horizons of Cosmology. Templeton Pressr. p. 208.
  40. ^ Singh, Simon (2005). Big Bang: The Origin of the Universe. Harper Perennial. p. 560. Bibcode:2004biba.book…..S.
  41. ^ C. Sivaram (1986). «Evolution of the Universe through the Planck epoch». Astrophysics and Space Science. 125 (1): 189–99. Bibcode:1986Ap&SS.125..189S. doi:10.1007/BF00643984. S2CID 123344693.
  42. ^ Johnson, Jennifer A. (February 2019). «Populating the periodic table: Nucleosynthesis of the elements». Science. 363 (6426): 474–478. Bibcode:2019Sci…363..474J. doi:10.1126/science.aau9540. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 30705182. S2CID 59565697.
  43. ^ a b Durrer, Ruth (2008). The Cosmic Microwave Background. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84704-9.
  44. ^ a b Steane, Andrew M. (2021). Relativity Made Relatively Easy, Volume 2: General Relativity and Cosmology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-192-89564-6.
  45. ^ Larson, Richard B. & Bromm, Volker (March 2002). «The First Stars in the Universe». Scientific American. Archived from the original on June 11, 2015. Retrieved June 9, 2015.
  46. ^ Ryden, Barbara, «Introduction to Cosmology», 2006, eqn. 6.33
  47. ^ a b c Urone, Paul Peter; et al. (2022). College Physics 2e. OpenStax. ISBN 978-1-951-69360-2.
  48. ^ «Antimatter». Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council. October 28, 2003. Archived from the original on March 7, 2004. Retrieved August 10, 2006.
  49. ^ Smorra C.; et al. (October 20, 2017). «A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment» (PDF). Nature. 550 (7676): 371–74. Bibcode:2017Natur.550..371S. doi:10.1038/nature24048. PMID 29052625. S2CID 205260736. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 30, 2018. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  50. ^ Landau & Lifshitz (1975, p. 361): «It is interesting to note that in a closed space the total electric charge must be zero. Namely, every closed surface in a finite space encloses on each side of itself a finite region of space. Therefore, the flux of the electric field through this surface is equal, on the one hand, to the total charge located in the interior of the surface, and on the other hand to the total charge outside of it, with opposite sign. Consequently, the sum of the charges on the two sides of the surface is zero.»
  51. ^ Kaku, Michio (March 11, 2008). Physics of the Impossible: A Scientific Exploration into the World of Phasers, Force Fields, Teleportation, and Time Travel. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. pp. 202–. ISBN 978-0-385-52544-2.
  52. ^ a b Bars, Itzhak; Terning, John (October 19, 2018). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-0-387-77637-8. Retrieved October 19, 2018.
  53. ^ Crockett, Christopher (February 20, 2013). «What is a light-year?». EarthSky. Archived from the original on February 20, 2015. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
  54. ^ a b Rindler, p. 196.
  55. ^ Christian, Eric; Samar, Safi-Harb. «How large is the Milky Way?». Archived from the original on February 2, 1999. Retrieved November 28, 2007.
  56. ^ Hall, Shannon (May 4, 2015). «Size of the Milky Way Upgraded, Solving Galaxy Puzzle». Space.com. Archived from the original on June 7, 2015. Retrieved June 9, 2015.
  57. ^ I. Ribas; C. Jordi; F. Vilardell; E.L. Fitzpatrick; R.W. Hilditch; F. Edward Guinan (2005). «First Determination of the Distance and Fundamental Properties of an Eclipsing Binary in the Andromeda Galaxy». Astrophysical Journal. 635 (1): L37–L40. arXiv:astro-ph/0511045. Bibcode:2005ApJ…635L..37R. doi:10.1086/499161. S2CID 119522151.
    McConnachie, A.W.; Irwin, M.J.; Ferguson, A.M.N.; Ibata, R.A.; Lewis, G.F.; Tanvir, N. (2005). «Distances and metallicities for 17 Local Group galaxies». Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 356 (4): 979–97. arXiv:astro-ph/0410489. Bibcode:2005MNRAS.356..979M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08514.x.
  58. ^ Janek, Vanessa (February 20, 2015). «How can space travel faster than the speed of light?». Universe Today. Archived from the original on December 16, 2021. Retrieved June 6, 2015.
  59. ^ «Is faster-than-light travel or communication possible? Section: Expansion of the Universe». Philip Gibbs. 1997. Archived from the original on March 10, 2010. Retrieved June 6, 2015.
  60. ^ M. Vardanyan, R. Trotta, J. Silk (January 28, 2011). «Applications of Bayesian model averaging to the curvature and size of the Universe». Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 413 (1): L91–L95. arXiv:1101.5476. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.413L..91V. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01040.x. S2CID 2616287.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  61. ^ Schreiber, Urs (June 6, 2008). «Urban Myths in Contemporary Cosmology». The n-Category Café. University of Texas at Austin. Archived from the original on July 1, 2020. Retrieved June 1, 2020.
  62. ^ Don N. Page (2007). «Susskind’s Challenge to the Hartle-Hawking No-Boundary Proposal and Possible Resolutions». Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2007 (1): 004. arXiv:hep-th/0610199. Bibcode:2007JCAP…01..004P. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/004. S2CID 17403084.
  63. ^ Berardelli, Phil (March 25, 2010). «Galaxy Collisions Give Birth to Quasars». Science News. Archived from the original on March 25, 2022. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
  64. ^ Riess, Adam G.; Filippenko; Challis; Clocchiatti; Diercks; Garnavich; Gilliland; Hogan; Jha; Kirshner; Leibundgut; Phillips; Reiss; Schmidt; Schommer; Smith; Spyromilio; Stubbs; Suntzeff; Tonry (1998). «Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant». Astronomical Journal. 116 (3): 1009–38. arXiv:astro-ph/9805201. Bibcode:1998AJ….116.1009R. doi:10.1086/300499. S2CID 15640044.
  65. ^ Perlmutter, S.; Aldering; Goldhaber; Knop; Nugent; Castro; Deustua; Fabbro; Goobar; Groom; Hook; Kim; Kim; Lee; Nunes; Pain; Pennypacker; Quimby; Lidman; Ellis; Irwin; McMahon; Ruiz‐Lapuente; Walton; Schaefer; Boyle; Filippenko; Matheson; Fruchter; et al. (1999). «Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae». Astrophysical Journal. 517 (2): 565–86. arXiv:astro-ph/9812133. Bibcode:1999ApJ…517..565P. doi:10.1086/307221. S2CID 118910636.
  66. ^ Serway, Raymond A.; Moses, Clement J.; Moyer, Curt A. (2004). Modern Physics. Cengage Learning. p. 21. ISBN 978-1-111-79437-8.
  67. ^ Fraknoi, Andrew; et al. (2022). Astronomy 2e. OpenStax. p. 1017. ISBN 978-1-951-69350-3.
  68. ^ Overbye, Dennis (October 11, 2003). «A ‘Cosmic Jerk’ That Reversed the Universe». New York Times. Archived from the original on July 1, 2017. Retrieved February 20, 2017.
  69. ^ Schutz, Bernard (May 31, 2009). A First Course in General Relativity (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 142, 171. ISBN 978-0-521-88705-2.
  70. ^ a b c Mermin, N. David (2021) [2005]. It’s About Time: Understanding Einstein’s Relativity (Princeton Science Library paperback ed.). Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12201-4. OCLC 1193067111.
  71. ^ Brill, Dieter; Jacobsen, Ted (2006). «Spacetime and Euclidean geometry». General Relativity and Gravitation. 38 (4): 643–51. arXiv:gr-qc/0407022. Bibcode:2006GReGr..38..643B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.338.7953. doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0254-9. S2CID 119067072.
  72. ^ Wheeler, John Archibald (June 18, 2010). Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-07948-7.
  73. ^ Kersting, Magdalena (May 2019). «Free fall in curved spacetime—how to visualise gravity in general relativity». Physics Education. 54 (3): 035008. Bibcode:2019PhyEd..54c5008K. doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ab08f5. ISSN 0031-9120. S2CID 127471222.
  74. ^ Goldstein, Herbert; Poole, Charles P.; Safko, John L. (2002). Classical Mechanics (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Addison Wesley. ISBN 0-201-31611-0. OCLC 47056311.
  75. ^ Goodstein, Judith R. (2018). Einstein’s Italian Mathematicians: Ricci, Levi-Civita, and the Birth of General Relativity. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-4704-2846-4. OCLC 1020305599.
  76. ^ Choquet-Bruhat, Yvonne (2009). General Relativity and the Einstein Equations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-155226-7. OCLC 317496332.
  77. ^ Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda (2021). The Disordered Cosmos: A Journey into Dark Matter, Spacetime, and Dreams Deferred. New York, NY: Bold Type Books. ISBN 978-1-5417-2470-9. OCLC 1164503847.
  78. ^ «WMAP Mission: Results- Age of the Universe». map.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  79. ^ a b Luminet, Jean-Pierre; Weeks, Jeffrey R.; Riazuelo, Alain; Lehoucq, Roland; Uzan, Jean-Philippe (October 9, 2003). «Dodecahedral space topology as an explanation for weak wide-angle temperature correlations in the cosmic microwave background». Nature (Submitted manuscript). 425 (6958): 593–95. arXiv:astro-ph/0310253. Bibcode:2003Natur.425..593L. doi:10.1038/nature01944. PMID 14534579. S2CID 4380713. Archived from the original on May 17, 2021. Retrieved August 21, 2018.
  80. ^ Luminet, Jean-Pierre; Roukema, Boudewijn F. (1999). «Topology of the Universe: Theory and Observations». Proceedings of Cosmology School held at Cargese, Corsica, August 1998. arXiv:astro-ph/9901364. Bibcode:1999ASIC..541..117L.
  81. ^ Edward Robert Harrison (2000). Cosmology: the science of the universe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 447–. ISBN 978-0-521-66148-5. Archived from the original on August 26, 2016. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
  82. ^ Liddle, Andrew R.; David Hilary Lyth (April 13, 2000). Cosmological inflation and large-scale structure. Cambridge University Press. pp. 24–. ISBN 978-0-521-57598-0. Archived from the original on December 31, 2013. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
  83. ^ «What is the Ultimate Fate of the Universe?». National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA. Archived from the original on December 22, 2021. Retrieved August 23, 2015.
  84. ^ «WMAP- Shape of the Universe». map.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  85. ^ Roukema, Boudewijn; Buliński, Zbigniew; Szaniewska, Agnieszka; Gaudin, Nicolas E. (2008). «A test of the Poincare dodecahedral space topology hypothesis with the WMAP CMB data». Astronomy and Astrophysics. 482 (3): 747–53. arXiv:0801.0006. Bibcode:2008A&A…482..747L. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078777. S2CID 1616362.
  86. ^ Aurich, Ralf; Lustig, S.; Steiner, F.; Then, H. (2004). «Hyperbolic Universes with a Horned Topology and the CMB Anisotropy». Classical and Quantum Gravity. 21 (21): 4901–26. arXiv:astro-ph/0403597. Bibcode:2004CQGra..21.4901A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/21/010. S2CID 17619026.
  87. ^ Planck Collaboration (2014). «Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters». Astronomy & Astrophysics. 571: A16. arXiv:1303.5076. Bibcode:2014A&A…571A..16P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591. S2CID 118349591.
  88. ^ «Planck reveals ‘almost perfect’ universe». Michael Banks. Physics World. March 21, 2013. Archived from the original on March 24, 2013. Retrieved March 21, 2013.
  89. ^ Friederich, Simon (November 12, 2021). «Fine-Tuning». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
  90. ^ Isaak, Mark, ed. (2005). «CI301: The Anthropic Principle». Index to Creationist Claims. TalkOrigins Archive. Archived from the original on July 1, 2014. Retrieved October 31, 2007.
  91. ^ Fritzsche, Hellmut. «electromagnetic radiation | physics». Encyclopædia Britannica. p. 1. Archived from the original on August 31, 2015. Retrieved July 26, 2015.
  92. ^ «Physics 7:Relativity, SpaceTime and Cosmology» (PDF). Physics 7:Relativity, SpaceTime and Cosmology. University of California Riverside. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 5, 2015. Retrieved July 26, 2015.
  93. ^ «Physics – for the 21st Century». www.learner.org. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Annenberg Learner. Archived from the original on September 7, 2015. Retrieved July 27, 2015.
  94. ^ «Dark matter – A history shapes by dark force». Timothy Ferris. National Geographic. 2015. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved December 29, 2015.
  95. ^ Redd, SPACE.com, Nola Taylor. «It’s Official: The Universe Is Dying Slowly». Scientific American. Archived from the original on August 12, 2015. Retrieved August 11, 2015.
  96. ^ Parr, Will; et al. «RIP Universe – Your Time Is Coming… Slowly | Video». Space.com. Archived from the original on August 13, 2015. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
  97. ^ a b Sean Carroll, Ph.D., Caltech, 2007, The Teaching Company, Dark Matter, Dark Energy: The Dark Side of the Universe, Guidebook Part 2 p. 46, Accessed October 7, 2013, «…dark matter: An invisible, essentially collisionless component of matter that makes up about 25 percent of the energy density of the universe… it’s a different kind of particle… something not yet observed in the laboratory…»
  98. ^ a b Peebles, P.J. E. & Ratra, Bharat (2003). «The cosmological constant and dark energy». Reviews of Modern Physics. 75 (2): 559–606. arXiv:astro-ph/0207347. Bibcode:2003RvMP…75..559P. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559. S2CID 118961123.
  99. ^ Mandolesi, N.; Calzolari, P.; Cortiglioni, S.; Delpino, F.; Sironi, G.; Inzani, P.; Deamici, G.; Solheim, J.-E.; Berger, L.; Partridge, R.B.; Martenis, P.L.; Sangree, C.H.; Harvey, R.C. (1986). «Large-scale homogeneity of the universe measured by the microwave background». Nature. 319 (6056): 751–53. Bibcode:1986Natur.319..751M. doi:10.1038/319751a0. S2CID 4349689.
  100. ^ «New Horizons spacecraft answers the question: How dark is space?». phys.org. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved January 15, 2021.
  101. ^ Howell, Elizabeth (March 20, 2018). «How Many Galaxies Are There?». Space.com. Archived from the original on February 28, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  102. ^ Staff (2019). «How Many Stars Are There In The Universe?». European Space Agency. Archived from the original on September 23, 2019. Retrieved September 21, 2019.
  103. ^ Marov, Mikhail Ya. (2015). «The Structure of the Universe». The Fundamentals of Modern Astrophysics. pp. 279–294. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8730-2_10. ISBN 978-1-4614-8729-6.
  104. ^ Mackie, Glen (February 1, 2002). «To see the Universe in a Grain of Taranaki Sand». Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing. Archived from the original on August 11, 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2017.
  105. ^ «Unveiling the Secret of a Virgo Dwarf Galaxy». European Southern Observatory Press Release. ESO: 12. May 3, 2000. Bibcode:2000eso..pres…12. Archived from the original on July 13, 2015. Retrieved January 3, 2007.
  106. ^ «Hubble’s Largest Galaxy Portrait Offers a New High-Definition View». NASA. February 28, 2006. Archived from the original on May 27, 2020. Retrieved January 3, 2007.
  107. ^ Gibney, Elizabeth (September 3, 2014). «Earth’s new address: ‘Solar System, Milky Way, Laniakea’«. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15819. S2CID 124323774. Archived from the original on January 7, 2019. Retrieved August 21, 2015.
  108. ^ «Local Group». Fraser Cain. Universe Today. May 4, 2009. Archived from the original on June 21, 2018. Retrieved August 21, 2015.
  109. ^ Devlin, Hannah; Correspondent, Science (April 20, 2015). «Astronomers discover largest known structure in the universe is … a big hole». The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 7, 2017. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  110. ^ «Content of the Universe – WMAP 9yr Pie Chart». wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved July 26, 2015.
  111. ^ Rindler, p. 202.
  112. ^ Liddle, Andrew (2003). An Introduction to Modern Cosmology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-84835-7.. p. 2.
  113. ^ Livio, Mario (2001). The Accelerating Universe: Infinite Expansion, the Cosmological Constant, and the Beauty of the Cosmos. John Wiley and Sons. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-471-43714-7. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved March 31, 2012.
  114. ^ Peebles, P.J.E. & Ratra, Bharat (2003). «The cosmological constant and dark energy». Reviews of Modern Physics. 75 (2): 559–606. arXiv:astro-ph/0207347. Bibcode:2003RvMP…75..559P. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559. S2CID 118961123.
  115. ^ Steinhardt, Paul J.; Turok, Neil (2006). «Why the cosmological constant is small and positive». Science. 312 (5777): 1180–83. arXiv:astro-ph/0605173. Bibcode:2006Sci…312.1180S. doi:10.1126/science.1126231. PMID 16675662. S2CID 14178620.
  116. ^ «Dark Energy». Hyperphysics. Archived from the original on May 27, 2013. Retrieved January 4, 2014.
  117. ^ Carroll, Sean (2001). «The cosmological constant». Living Reviews in Relativity. 4 (1): 1. arXiv:astro-ph/0004075. Bibcode:2001LRR…..4….1C. doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-1. PMC 5256042. PMID 28179856. Archived from the original on October 13, 2006. Retrieved September 28, 2006.
  118. ^ «Planck captures portrait of the young universe, revealing earliest light». University of Cambridge. March 21, 2013. Archived from the original on April 17, 2019. Retrieved March 21, 2013.
  119. ^ P. Davies (1992). The New Physics: A Synthesis. Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-521-43831-5. Archived from the original on February 3, 2021. Retrieved May 17, 2020.
  120. ^ Persic, Massimo; Salucci, Paolo (September 1, 1992). «The baryon content of the universe». Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 258 (1): 14P–18P. arXiv:astro-ph/0502178. Bibcode:1992MNRAS.258P..14P. doi:10.1093/mnras/258.1.14P. ISSN 0035-8711. S2CID 17945298.
  121. ^ Shull, J. Michael; Smith, Britton D.; Danforth, Charles W. (November 1, 2012). «The Baryon Census in a Multiphase Intergalactic Medium: 30% of the Baryons May Still Be Missing». The Astrophysical Journal. 759 (1): 23. arXiv:1112.2706. Bibcode:2012ApJ…759…23S. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/23. ISSN 0004-637X. S2CID 119295243. Galaxy surveys have found ∼10% of these baryons in collapsed objects such as galaxies, groups, and clusters […] Of the remaining 80%–90% of cosmological baryons, approximately half can be accounted for in the low-z [intergalactic medium]
  122. ^ Macquart, J.-P.; Prochaska, J. X.; McQuinn, M.; Bannister, K. W.; Bhandari, S.; Day, C. K.; Deller, A. T.; Ekers, R. D.; James, C. W.; Marnoch, L.; Osłowski, S.; Phillips, C.; Ryder, S. D.; Scott, D. R.; Shannon, R. M. (May 28, 2020). «A census of baryons in the Universe from localized fast radio bursts». Nature. 581 (7809): 391–395. arXiv:2005.13161. Bibcode:2020Natur.581..391M. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2300-2. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 32461651. S2CID 256821489.
  123. ^ Flowers, Paul; et al. (2019). Chemistry 2e. OpenStax. p. 14. ISBN 978-1-947-17262-3.
  124. ^ «The Nobel Prize in Physics 2001». NobelPrize.org. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  125. ^ Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude; Guery-Odelin, David (September 2, 2011). Advances In Atomic Physics: An Overview. World Scientific. p. 684. ISBN 978-981-4390-58-3.
  126. ^ G. ‘t Hooft (1997). In search of the ultimate building blocks. Cambridge University Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-521-57883-7.
  127. ^ Clayton, Donald D. (1983). Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis. The University of Chicago Press. pp. 362–435. ISBN 978-0-226-10953-4.
  128. ^ Veltman, Martinus (2003). Facts and Mysteries in Elementary Particle Physics. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-238-149-1.
  129. ^ a b Braibant, Sylvie; Giacomelli, Giorgio; Spurio, Maurizio (2012). Particles and Fundamental Interactions: An Introduction to Particle Physics (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-94-007-2463-1. Archived from the original on August 26, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2016.
  130. ^ Close, Frank (2012). Particle Physics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280434-1.
  131. ^ Zwiebach, Barton (2022). Mastering Quantum Mechanics: Essentials, Theory, and Applications. MIT Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-262-04613-8.
  132. ^ a b R. Oerter (2006). The Theory of Almost Everything: The Standard Model, the Unsung Triumph of Modern Physics (Kindle ed.). Penguin Group. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-13-236678-6.
  133. ^ Onyisi, P. (October 23, 2012). «Higgs boson FAQ». University of Texas ATLAS group. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved January 8, 2013.
  134. ^ Strassler, M. (October 12, 2012). «The Higgs FAQ 2.0». ProfMattStrassler.com. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved January 8, 2013. [Q] Why do particle physicists care so much about the Higgs particle?
    [A] Well, actually, they don’t. What they really care about is the Higgs field, because it is so important. [emphasis in original]
  135. ^ Weinberg, Steven (April 20, 2011). Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientist’s Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-78786-6.
  136. ^ a b c Allday, Jonathan (2002). Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang (Second ed.). IOP Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7503-0806-9.
  137. ^ «Lepton (physics)». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on May 11, 2015. Retrieved September 29, 2010.
  138. ^ Harari, H. (1977). «Beyond charm». In Balian, R.; Llewellyn-Smith, C.H. (eds.). Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions at High Energy, Les Houches, France, Jul 5 – Aug 14, 1976. Les Houches Summer School Proceedings. Vol. 29. North-Holland. p. 613.
  139. ^ Harari H. (1977). «Three generations of quarks and leptons» (PDF). In E. van Goeler; Weinstein R. (eds.). Proceedings of the XII Rencontre de Moriond. p. 170. SLAC-PUB-1974. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 13, 2020. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
  140. ^ «Experiment confirms famous physics model» (Press release). MIT News Office. April 18, 2007. Archived from the original on July 5, 2013. Retrieved June 2, 2015.
  141. ^ «Thermal history of the universe and early growth of density fluctuations» (PDF). Guinevere Kauffmann. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 21, 2016. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
  142. ^ «First few minutes». Eric Chaisson. Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Archived from the original on December 4, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
  143. ^ «Timeline of the Big Bang». The physics of the Universe. Archived from the original on March 30, 2020. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
  144. ^ a b c d Zeilik, Michael; Gregory, Stephen A. (1998). «25-2». Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics (4th ed.). Saunders College Publishing. ISBN 978-0-03-006228-5.
  145. ^ Raine & Thomas (2001, p. 12)
  146. ^ a b Raine & Thomas (2001, p. 66)
  147. ^ Friedmann A. (1922). «Über die Krümmung des Raumes» (PDF). Zeitschrift für Physik. 10 (1): 377–86. Bibcode:1922ZPhy…10..377F. doi:10.1007/BF01332580. S2CID 125190902. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 15, 2016. Retrieved August 13, 2015.
  148. ^ «Cosmic Detectives». The European Space Agency (ESA). April 2, 2013. Archived from the original on February 11, 2019. Retrieved April 15, 2013.
  149. ^ Raine & Thomas (2001, pp. 122–23)
  150. ^ a b Raine & Thomas (2001, p. 70)
  151. ^ Raine & Thomas (2001, p. 84)
  152. ^ Raine & Thomas (2001, pp. 88, 110–13)
  153. ^ Munitz MK (1959). «One Universe or Many?». Journal of the History of Ideas. 12 (2): 231–55. doi:10.2307/2707516. JSTOR 2707516.
  154. ^ Linde A. (1986). «Eternal chaotic inflation». Mod. Phys. Lett. A. 1 (2): 81–85. Bibcode:1986MPLA….1…81L. doi:10.1142/S0217732386000129. S2CID 123472763. Archived from the original on April 17, 2019. Retrieved August 6, 2017.
    Linde A. (1986). «Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflationary Universe» (PDF). Phys. Lett. B. 175 (4): 395–400. Bibcode:1986PhLB..175..395L. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90611-8. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 27, 2013. Retrieved March 17, 2011.
  155. ^ Everett, Hugh (1957). «Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics». Reviews of Modern Physics. 29 (3): 454–62. Bibcode:1957RvMP…29..454E. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454. S2CID 17178479. Archived from the original on July 28, 2020. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
  156. ^ Ball, Philip (February 17, 2015). «Too many worlds». Aeon.co. Retrieved September 23, 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  157. ^ Peres, Asher (1995). Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 374. ISBN 0-7923-2549-4.
  158. ^ Kent, Adrian (February 2015). «Does it Make Sense to Speak of Self-Locating Uncertainty in the Universal Wave Function? Remarks on Sebens and Carroll». Foundations of Physics. 45 (2): 211–217. arXiv:1408.1944. Bibcode:2015FoPh…45..211K. doi:10.1007/s10701-014-9862-5. ISSN 0015-9018. S2CID 118471198.
  159. ^ Schlosshauer, Maximilian; Kofler, Johannes; Zeilinger, Anton (August 1, 2013). «A snapshot of foundational attitudes toward quantum mechanics». Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 44 (3): 222–230. arXiv:1301.1069. Bibcode:2013SHPMP..44..222S. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.04.004. ISSN 1355-2198. S2CID 55537196.
  160. ^ Mermin, N. David (July 1, 2012). «Commentary: Quantum mechanics: Fixing the shifty split». Physics Today. 65 (7): 8–10. Bibcode:2012PhT….65g…8M. doi:10.1063/PT.3.1618. ISSN 0031-9228. New interpretations appear every year. None ever disappear.
  161. ^ Cabello, Adán (2017). «Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness». In Lombardi, Olimpia; Fortin, Sebastian; Holik, Federico; López, Cristian (eds.). What is Quantum Information?. Cambridge University Press. pp. 138–143. arXiv:1509.04711. Bibcode:2015arXiv150904711C. doi:10.1017/9781316494233.009. ISBN 9781107142114. S2CID 118419619.
  162. ^ Jaume Garriga, Alexander Vilenkin (2007). «Many Worlds in One». Physical Review D. 64 (4). arXiv:gr-qc/0102010v2. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043511. S2CID 119000743.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  163. ^ a b Tegmark M. (2003). «Parallel universes. Not just a staple of science fiction, other universes are a direct implication of cosmological observations». Scientific American. 288 (5): 40–51. arXiv:astro-ph/0302131. Bibcode:2003SciAm.288e..40T. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40. PMID 12701329.
  164. ^ Tegmark, Max (2003). «Parallel Universes». Scientific American. 288 (5): 40–51. arXiv:astro-ph/0302131. Bibcode:2003SciAm.288e..40T. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40. PMID 12701329.
  165. ^ Francisco José Soler Gil, Manuel Alfonseca (2013). «About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space». Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science. 29 (3): 361. arXiv:1301.5295. doi:10.1387/theoria.9951. hdl:10486/664735. S2CID 52996408.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  166. ^ Ellis G. F (2011). «Does the Multiverse Really Exist?». Scientific American. 305 (2): 38–43. Bibcode:2011SciAm.305a..38E. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0811-38. PMID 21827123.
  167. ^ Moskowitz, Clara (August 12, 2011). «Weird! Our Universe May Be a ‘Multiverse,’ Scientists Say». livescience. Archived from the original on May 5, 2015. Retrieved May 4, 2015.
  168. ^ Gernet, J. (1993–1994). «Space and time: Science and religion in the encounter between China and Europe». Chinese Science. Vol. 11. pp. 93–102.
  169. ^ Blandford R. D. (2015). «A century of general relativity: Astrophysics and cosmology». Science. 347 (6226): 1103–08. Bibcode:2015Sci…347.1103B. doi:10.1126/science.aaa4033. PMID 25745165. S2CID 30364122.
  170. ^ Leeming, David A. (2010). Creation Myths of the World. ABC-CLIO. p. xvii. ISBN 978-1-59884-174-9. In common usage the word ‘myth’ refers to narratives or beliefs that are untrue or merely fanciful; the stories that make up national or ethnic mythologies describe characters and events that common sense and experience tell us are impossible. Nevertheless, all cultures celebrate such myths and attribute to them various degrees of literal or symbolic truth.
  171. ^ Eliade, Mircea (1964). Myth and Reality (Religious Traditions of the World). Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0-04-291001-7.
  172. ^ Leonard, Scott A.; McClure, Michael (2004). Myth and Knowing: An Introduction to World Mythology (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-7674-1957-4.
  173. ^ (Henry Gravrand, «La civilisation Sereer -Pangool») [in] Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frobenius-Institut, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kulturmorphologie, Frobenius Gesellschaft, «Paideuma: Mitteilungen zur Kulturkunde, Volumes 43–44», F. Steiner (1997), pp. 144–45, ISBN 3-515-02842-0
  174. ^ Young, Louise B. (1993). The Unfinished Universe. Oxford University Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-195-08039-1. OCLC 26399171.
  175. ^ Graham, Daniel W. (September 3, 2019). «Heraclitus». In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  176. ^ Palmer, John (October 19, 2020). «Parmenides». In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  177. ^ Palmer, John (April 8, 2021). «Zeno of Elea». In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  178. ^ Dowden, Bradley. «Zeno’s Paradoxes». Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  179. ^ Will Durant, Our Oriental Heritage:

    «Two systems of Hindu thought propound physical theories suggestively similar to those of Greece. Kanada, founder of the Vaisheshika philosophy, held that the world is composed of atoms as many in kind as the various elements. The Jains more nearly approximated to Democritus by teaching that all atoms were of the same kind, producing different effects by diverse modes of combinations. Kanada believed light and heat to be varieties of the same substance; Udayana taught that all heat comes from the Sun; and Vachaspati, like Newton, interpreted light as composed of minute particles emitted by substances and striking the eye.»

  180. ^ Stcherbatsky, F. Th. (1930, 1962), Buddhist Logic, Volume 1, p. 19, Dover, New York:

    «The Buddhists denied the existence of substantial matter altogether. Movement consists for them of moments, it is a staccato movement, momentary flashes of a stream of energy… «Everything is evanescent»,… says the Buddhist, because there is no stuff… Both systems [Sānkhya, and later Indian Buddhism] share in common a tendency to push the analysis of existence up to its minutest, last elements which are imagined as absolute qualities, or things possessing only one unique quality. They are called «qualities» (guna-dharma) in both systems in the sense of absolute qualities, a kind of atomic, or intra-atomic, energies of which the empirical things are composed. Both systems, therefore, agree in denying the objective reality of the categories of Substance and Quality,… and of the relation of Inference uniting them. There is in Sānkhya philosophy no separate existence of qualities. What we call quality is but a particular manifestation of a subtle entity. To every new unit of quality corresponds a subtle quantum of matter which is called guna, «quality», but represents a subtle substantive entity. The same applies to early Buddhism where all qualities are substantive… or, more precisely, dynamic entities, although they are also called dharmas (‘qualities’).»

  181. ^ Donald Wayne Viney (1985). «The Cosmological Argument». Charles Hartshorne and the Existence of God. SUNY Press. pp. 65–68. ISBN 978-0-87395-907-0.
  182. ^ Lindberg, David C. (2007). The beginnings of Western science: the European Scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. p. 12. ISBN 9780226482057.
  183. ^ Grant, Edward (2007). «Ancient Egypt to Plato». A History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century (First ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–26. ISBN 978-0-521-68957-1.
  184. ^ Horowitz, Wayne (1988). «The Babylonian Map of the World». Iraq. 50: 147–165. doi:10.2307/4200289. JSTOR 4200289. S2CID 190703581.
  185. ^ Keel, Othmar (1997). The Symbolism of the Biblical World. Eisenbrauns. pp. 20–22. ISBN 978-1-575-06014-9.
  186. ^ Wright, Larry (August 1973). «The astronomy of Eudoxus: Geometry or physics?». Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 4 (2): 165–172. Bibcode:1973SHPSA…4..165W. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(73)90002-2.
  187. ^ Dicati, Renato (2013), «The Ancients’ Astronomy», Stamping Through Astronomy, Milano: Springer Milan, pp. 19–55, doi:10.1007/978-88-470-2829-6_2, ISBN 978-88-470-2828-9, retrieved February 27, 2023
  188. ^ Aristotle; Forster, E. S.; Dobson, J. F. (1914). De Mundo. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. p. 2.
  189. ^ Goldstein, Bernard R. (1997). «Saving the phenomena: the background to Ptolemy’s planetary theory». Journal for the History of Astronomy. 28 (1): 1–12. Bibcode:1997JHA….28….1G. doi:10.1177/002182869702800101. S2CID 118875902.
  190. ^ Boyer, C. (1968) A History of Mathematics. Wiley, p. 54.
  191. ^ Heath, Thomas (September 26, 2013). Aristarchus of Samos, the Ancient Copernicus: A History of Greek Astronomy to Aristarchus, Together with Aristarchus’s Treatise on the Sizes and Distances of the Sun and Moon. Cambridge University Press. p. 302. ISBN 978-1-108-06233-6.
  192. ^ Kolkata, James J. (2015). Elementary Cosmology: From Aristotle’s Universe to the Big Bang and Beyond. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/978-1-6817-4100-0ch4. ISBN 978-1-68174-100-0.
  193. ^ Neugebauer, Otto E. (1945). «The History of Ancient Astronomy Problems and Methods». Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 4 (1): 166–173. doi:10.1086/370729. JSTOR 595168. S2CID 162347339. the Chaldaean Seleucus from Seleucia
  194. ^ Sarton, George (1955). «Chaldaean Astronomy of the Last Three Centuries B. C». Journal of the American Oriental Society. 75 (3): 166–73 (169). doi:10.2307/595168. JSTOR 595168. the heliocentrical astronomy invented by Aristarchos of Samos and still defended a century later by Seleucos the Babylonian
  195. ^ William P. D. Wightman (1951, 1953), The Growth of Scientific Ideas, Yale University Press p. 38, where Wightman calls him Seleukos the Chaldean.
  196. ^ Lucio Russo, Flussi e riflussi, Feltrinelli, Milano, 2003, ISBN 88-07-10349-4.
  197. ^ Bartel (1987, p. 527)
  198. ^ Bartel (1987, pp. 527–29)
  199. ^ Bartel (1987, pp. 534–7)
  200. ^ Nasr, Seyyed H. (1993) [1964]. An Introduction to Islamic Cosmological Doctrines (2nd ed.). 1st edition by Harvard University Press, 2nd edition by State University of New York Press. pp. 135–36. ISBN 978-0-7914-1515-3.
  201. ^ Frautschi, Steven C.; Olenick, Richard P.; Apostol, Tom M.; Goodstein, David L. (2007). The Mechanical Universe: Mechanics and Heat (Advanced ed.). Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-521-71590-4. OCLC 227002144.
  202. ^ Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, p. 754.
  203. ^ Ālī, Ema Ākabara. Science in the Quran. Vol. 1. Malik Library. p. 218.
  204. ^ Ragep, F. Jamil (2001), «Tusi and Copernicus: The Earth’s Motion in Context», Science in Context, 14 (1–2): 145–63, doi:10.1017/s0269889701000060, S2CID 145372613
  205. ^ a b Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, pp. 755–56.
  206. ^ a b Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, p. 756.
  207. ^ de Cheseaux JPL (1744). Traité de la Comète. Lausanne. pp. 223ff.. Reprinted as Appendix II in Dickson FP (1969). The Bowl of Night: The Physical Universe and Scientific Thought. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54003-2.
  208. ^ Olbers HWM (1826). «Unknown title». Bode’s Jahrbuch. 111.. Reprinted as Appendix I in Dickson FP (1969). The Bowl of Night: The Physical Universe and Scientific Thought. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54003-2.
  209. ^ Jeans, J. H. (1902). «The Stability of a Spherical Nebula». Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 199 (312–320): 1–53. Bibcode:1902RSPTA.199….1J. doi:10.1098/rsta.1902.0012. JSTOR 90845.
  210. ^ Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, p. 757.
  211. ^ Jones, Kenneth Glyn (February 1971). «The Observational Basis for Kant’s Cosmogony: A Critical Analysis». Journal for the History of Astronomy. 2 (1): 29–34. Bibcode:1971JHA…..2…29J. doi:10.1177/002182867100200104. ISSN 0021-8286. S2CID 126269712.
  212. ^ Smith, Robert W. (February 2008). «Beyond the Galaxy: The Development of Extragalactic Astronomy 1885–1965, Part 1». Journal for the History of Astronomy. 39 (1): 91–119. Bibcode:2008JHA….39…91S. doi:10.1177/002182860803900106. ISSN 0021-8286. S2CID 117430789.
  213. ^ Sharov, Aleksandr Sergeevich; Novikov, Igor Dmitrievich (1993). Edwin Hubble, the discoverer of the big bang universe. Cambridge University Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-521-41617-7. Archived from the original on June 23, 2013. Retrieved December 31, 2011.
  214. ^ Einstein, A (1917). «Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie». Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte. 1917. (part 1): 142–52.

Bibliography

  • Bartel, Leendert van der Waerden (1987). «The Heliocentric System in Greek, Persian and Hindu Astronomy». Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 500 (1): 525–45. Bibcode:1987NYASA.500..525V. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb37224.x. S2CID 222087224.
  • Landau L, Lifshitz E (1975). The Classical Theory of Fields (Course of Theoretical Physics). Vol. 2 (revised 4th English ed.). New York: Pergamon Press. pp. 358–97. ISBN 978-0-08-018176-9.
  • Liddell, H. G. & Scott, R. (1968). A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-864214-5.
  • Misner; C.W.; Thorne; Kip; Wheeler; J.A. (1973). Gravitation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. pp. 703–816. ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0.
  • Raine, D. J.; Thomas, E. G. (2001). An Introduction to the Science of Cosmology. Institute of Physics Publishing.
  • Rindler, W. (1977). Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 193–244. ISBN 978-0-387-10090-6.
  • Rees, Martin, ed. (2012). Smithsonian Universe (2nd ed.). London: Dorling Kindersley. ISBN 978-0-7566-9841-6.

External links

Spoken Wikipedia icon

These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated 13 June 2012, and do not reflect subsequent edits.

  • NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) / (NED-Distances).
  • There are about 1082 atoms in the observable universe – LiveScience, July 2021.
  • This is why we will never know everything about our universeForbes, May 2019.

The word “universe” comes from the Latin “universum” which means all things, everyone, the whole world. And this expression, in turn, comes from the Latin adjective “universus”, which means “everything together”, or the total set, or relative to the whole.

What does the word universe mean?

u·ni·ver·so |e|

1. Set of how much there is. 2. The world.

What does Universe and world mean?

What is the difference between world and universe? The word universe is of Latin origin “universum” and means “whole whole” or “all in one”. Mundo is a noun and designates the physical space of the entire planet. From the Latin mundu and the ancient Greek κόσμος, kósmos, it has the meaning of order, organization, beauty, harmony.

How do you spell the word universe?

universe

  1. [with capital] set of all that exists, as a whole.
  2. [with capital letter] ASTRONOMY set formed by space with all the stars; cosmos.
  3. [with capital] the world; the land.
  4. meeting of several elements that form a whole.
  5. set of elements that are taken as a reference for statistical purposes.

What is answer universe?

The Universe is everything that physically exists, the sum of space and time and the most varied forms of matter, such as planets, stars, galaxies and the components of intergalactic space.

What is the synonym of universe?

1 cosmos, cosmos, macrocosm, metagalaxy, solar system. Medium or domain in which something occurs: 2 medium, domain, ambit, environment, space.

Why is 42 the answer to everything?

Highlighted. In the book The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams, the number 42 is the answer to «the fundamental question of life, the universe, and everything». In the book, this answer was calculated over 7,5 million years by a supercomputer called Pensamento Profundo (or Deep Thought, in English).

How old is our universe?

Determining with more precision the age of the Universe is a challenge that has mobilized cosmologists and astrophysicists for decades. As of the 21st century, the most accepted estimate is approximately 13,8 billion years. However, there are those who maintain that the Big Bang would have occurred hundreds of millions of years later.

What is our universe like?

Our galaxy has about 200 billion stars and has a spiral shape and has a mass of about one trillion and 750 billion solar masses. Its spiral arms circle around a gigantic core.

Why is the universe infinite?

Well, if today the Universe expands, it is because at some point it must have had infinite density and negligible volume. The belief that it is infinite must have arisen from its current size: 1 trillion km and approximately 15 billion years of existence.

Where is the end of the universe?

78 billion light years.

This is the lower bound for the size of the entire universe, based on the estimated current distance between points we can see on opposite sides of the cosmic microwave background; therefore, it represents the diameter of the space formed by the cosmic background radiation.

How is the universe divided?

The universe would thus be divided into two totally distinct parts. The celestial world, starting from the Moon, would be made of ether. The terrestrial or sublunary world (below the Moon) would be formed by earth, water, air and fire.

Which is bigger the world or the universe?

Answer: Universe. Explanation: Universe is the set of everything that exists, Earth, stars, galaxies, in short, all matter disseminated in space, also known as infinity.

How is universe in English?

universe s

The creation of the universe remains a mystery.

How to speak to the universe?

How to communicate with the universe? The Universe can send you the signal through people, images, music, animals or in many ways. In the case of the butterfly, you might not see a real butterfly, but you might see a butterfly on a picture, a sweater, or the word butterfly written somewhere.

How many universes are there in the world?

The discovery of planets located outside the solar system, also called exoplanets, contributes to the studies of possible signs of life in the universe.

What else exists in the universe?

Studies with the probe also concluded that the universe is composed of about 4% of baryonic matter (formed by protons, electrons, neutrons), 23% of dark matter and about 73% of dark energy.

What is the composition of the universe?

Through Cosmology, we managed to measure the composition of the universe in four components: Radiation (formed by photons, which are particles of light), “baryonic” matter (which constitutes everything we know), dark matter and dark energy.

What is the opposite of universe?

The opposite of universe is: 1. nothing. two.

Meaning of Metagalaxy

feminine noun Ensemble of the observable universe.

Words that rhyme with Universe: Controversial. Adverse. Wicked.

What is the meaning of life?

What matters is not the meaning of life in general, but the specific meaning of a person’s life, at a certain point in their existence. Each one has his vocation, his personal mission, for which he needs to carry out specific tasks.

What is the number of our universe?

What is the number of our universe? According to its estimated age, which is 13,5 billion years old, there are also estimates of its current size, which is 156 billion light years. It should be noted that the speed of expansion of the universe is much higher than the speed of light.

What is the answer to the world universe is everything else?

One of the theories put forward in Douglas Adams’ Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy book series is that a computer was able to calculate the answer to «the fundamental question of life, the universe and everything»: 42.

What’s inside the galaxy?

Galaxies are collections of stars, dust, gases and dark matter that make up the Universe. They can be elliptical, spiral, like the Milky Way, or have an irregular shape. Triangle Galaxy or Messier 33. Galaxies are systems formed by thousands to trillions of stars, dust, gases and dark matter.

How old is the sun?

Our galaxy was named the Milky Way because of its whitish appearance. The ancient Greeks called it that because they saw a “milk path” when looking at the sky. This milky appearance is most visible to the naked eye on winter nights and in places with little light pollution.

What is the function of the universe?

In astronomy, the Universe corresponds to the set of all existing matter, energy, space and time. It brings together the stars: planets, comets, stars, galaxies, nebulae, satellites, among others. The universe is, therefore, more than an immense place, it is everything, and encompasses everything that exists.

What is man’s place in the universe?

But after all, what is our place in the Universe? Starting from planet Earth, our horizon expands to the Solar System, which contains seven more planets. This system is located in one of the arms of our galaxy: the Milky Way; which is part of the Local Group, a group of nearby galaxies.

What is at the center of the universe?

At the center of every galaxy in the Universe is a supermassive black hole. About a billion years after the big bang, the first stars were born and coalesced, forming a body rotating on itself.

The connection with the universe serves to generate harmony with balance, control of your energetic life, health of the human body and establishment of this harmony of the superior “I” with reality.

What are the limits of the Universe?

What are the limits of the Universe? 78 billion light years. This is the lower bound for the size of the entire universe, based on the estimated current distance between points we can see on opposite sides of the cosmic microwave background; therefore, it represents the diameter of the space formed by the cosmic background radiation.

What’s inside infinity?

In common sense, the “infinite” is defined as the negation of the finite: what is not limited, what does not end. For mathematicians, there is a more straightforward alternative: a set is infinite when there is space left within it. To explain this better, let’s turn to mathematician David Hilbert (1862 – 1943).

What’s at the bottom of the Universe?

This environment consists of a partial vacuum containing a low density of particles, predominantly hydrogen and helium plasma, in addition to electromagnetic radiation, magnetic fields, neutrinos, interstellar dust and cosmic rays.

What is the most distant object in the Universe?

Most distant objects confirmed

First Name Redshift (z) Distance (Billions of light years)
BDF-521 z = 7,008 12,89
G2-1408 z = 6,972 12,88
IOK-1 z = 6,964 12,88
LAE J095950.99+021219.1 z = 6,944

What will be the future of the Universe?

But if the mass is sufficient to stop the expansion, the Big Crunch will take place or, what is the same thing, the Universe, forced by the large amount of mass, will begin to compress itself until, in about 20 billion years, ends up collapsing into a singularity, something similar to the Big Bang, but in reverse (“Big Crunch”).

What is the name of the biggest star in the Universe?

However, among the currently known stars, the largest is VY Canis Majoris, or simply VY Cma. VY Cma is classified under the category of “hypergiant stars”, which are considered very rare by astronomers.

What are the main characteristics of the Universe?

The universe is immense and complex, check out some of its features here! The universe has billions of galaxies, composed of planets, asteroids, stars, comets, natural satellites, cosmic dust, among other celestial bodies. There are a lot of stars in the universe, with different sizes.

How many stars are there in our galaxy?

Galaxies contain hundreds of billions of stars on average. And estimates also point to hundreds of billions of galaxies in the Universe. This would result in the existence of more than 10 sextillion stars.

What is the biggest thing in the world?

Discover the 10 greatest things in the world:

  • Elephants
  • The jackfruit.
  • Masjid al-Haram.
  • The Great Barrier Reef.
  • Greenland/Greenland.
  • Salar de Uyuni.
  • Giant sequoia. The 10 biggest places, living beings and things in the world.
  • The blue whale. The 10 biggest places, living beings and things in the world.

What is our address in the universe?

The Milky Way is on the edge of the Laniakea supercluster – a cluster that is 500 million light-years across and has a mass of 100 million billion suns.

How is universe in English?

universe s

The creation of the universe remains a mystery.

What is the Brainly universe?

Set of all matter, that is, everything that occupies a place in space, and existing energy. In them are gathered celestial bodies such as: planets, comets, stars…

When did the concept of the universe emerge?

The Big Bang theory is openly accepted by science today and implies that the Universe could have originated 13 730±120 million years ago, at a definite time.

Thus if the spherical-surface beings are living on a planet of which the solar system occupies only a negligibly small part of the spherical universe, they have no means of determining whether they are living in a finite or in an infinite universe, because the “piece of universe” to which they have access is in both cases practically plane, or Euclidean. ❋ Unknown (1920)

«The term universe in its complete physical sense applies to all matter in existence.» ❋ Unknown (2010)

Specifically the notion that what we call our universe is a 4-dimensional space-time that itself is just a surface in a higher dimensional space, called a brane, a 4-brane in this case. ❋ Unknown (2010)

The word universe literally means everything that exists. ❋ Lucy (2009)

Since the universe is virtually transparent to radiation of these wavelengths, nothing would really have happened to it: the radiation would expand in universe at the same rate as the universe is expanding. ❋ Unknown (1978)

When we began to realize that there were other such vast aggregations of stars, we called them «island universes,» but this was an obvious misnomer; since the word universe means everything there is, it can hardly have a plural. ❋ Unknown (2011)

Religious belief, our sense of our selves as humans, our place in the universe is about to be seriously challenged, as it has been in the past. ❋ Sena Jeter Naslund (2010)

Now Hoyle may have been wrong about the steady state theory – the very term «big bang» as used to describe the beginning of the universe is his own dismissive phrase for what he regarded as a poor alternative theory – but he was no fool otherwise, and it was only his own argumentative and bloody-minded character, it is said, that prevented him from winning the Nobel prize. ❋ Nicholas Lezard (2010)

We are taught by great actions that the universe is the property of every individual in it. ❋ Tom Morris (2010)

Even if our universe is a random accident, we still want to believe that it must have been caused by the deterministic laws that govern it. ❋ PhD Santhosh Mathew (2010)

Still, it’s not like the universe is always asking Superman to be a villain. ❋ Unknown (2009)

The nature of the universe is a point of interest to many of us and I note on this thread that Pixie and others have expressed surprise at the notion of an infinite universe. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Meanwhile, I will continue to imagine geometries where square circles exist and accept the possibility that our universe is a grand science fair project created by a supernatural being (and delight at the thought). ❋ Unknown (2009)

The universe is, in general, an incredibly expensive, [paradoxial], [crowded], lonely, and ridiculously [entertaining] place in which to be located. ❋ NeNay (2004)

It’s [just] that [simple].
[The Universe]. ❋ Chowman (2006)

[The Universe] is [big]. ❋ Cloud (2004)

[THANOS SNAPPED] [HALF] [THE UNIVERSE] ❋ Macoroni Box (2019)

I had a dream that Prince and [David Bowie] appeared on a [spaceship] with a universe of [unicorns]. ❋ Alonius Poser (2016)

[Hitchhiker’s] [Guide]: In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a [bad move]. ❋ Panthean (2008)

John always did well in his school classes, and did three [A-Levels] and got good grades. He went to uni for three years which put him about £30,000 in debt. When he finished his course he found that his degree counted for very little, since he had no experience and the other 400 job applicants also had degrees. He took a job as a [sales rep] with Coca-Cola, but got fired when he went to an interview for a better job. Meanwhile the cost of living rose exponentially, and by the age of 24, John’s debts stood at around £45,000. This was before he even got a mortgage. A couple of years afterwards he divorced his wife on the grounds of [infidelity], but she got custody of the kids, and now he doesn’t even get to see them despite paying atrocious amounts of child support. Welcome to [Blair’s] Britain. ❋ Believe Me It Happens (2004)

The more we [learn], the larger our [universe] seems to get. ❋ OneBadAsp (2006)

mum: have fun at university son,and don’t forget your lunch
and i don’t want you playing with that john kid he’s a [bad influence] on you. son: yes mum, can i [go round] and play at sam’s after my [class’s] finish . mum: yes but be home in time for dinner. ❋ Tempestdawn (2010)

«Lets go out tonight, i just go to [the university] [tomorrow] [anyways]». ❋ TJones88 (2010)

Table of Contents

  1. What is the etymology of universe?
  2. When did the word universe come out?
  3. Is Universe an adjective?
  4. How many galaxies are there?
  5. What are the 4 types of galaxy?
  6. What is our galaxy called?
  7. What is Earth’s universe called?
  8. What is the closest galaxy to ours?
  9. Can humans travel to another galaxy?
  10. Which is the largest galaxy in the universe?
  11. Which is the biggest universe?
  12. What is the brightest star in the universe?
  13. What is the hottest star color?
  14. What is bigger than a galaxy?
  15. What is larger than the universe?
  16. Why is the universe so big?
  17. What is the beyond the universe?
  18. Does the universe end?
  19. What was before the universe?

1 : the whole body of things and phenomena observed or postulated : cosmos: such as. a : a systematic whole held to arise by and persist through the direct intervention of divine power. b : the world of human experience. c(1) : the entire celestial cosmos.

What is the etymology of universe?

1580s, “the whole world, cosmos, the totality of existing things,” from Old French univers (12c.), from Latin universum “all things, everybody, all people, the whole world,” noun use of neuter of adjective universus “all together, all in one, whole, entire, relating to all,” literally “turned into one,” from unus “one” …

When did the word universe come out?

1589

Is Universe an adjective?

As detailed above, ‘in-universe’ is an adjective.

How many galaxies are there?

XDF (2012) view: Each light speck is a galaxy, some of which are as old as 13.2 billion years – the observable universe is estimated to contain 200 billion to two trillion galaxies.

What are the 4 types of galaxy?

In 1936, Hubble debuted a way to classify galaxies, grouping them into four main types: spiral galaxies, lenticular galaxies, elliptical galaxies, and irregular galaxies.

What is our galaxy called?

The Milky Way Galaxy

What is Earth’s universe called?

Well, Earth is located in the universe in the Virgo Supercluster of galaxies. A supercluster is a group of galaxies held together by gravity. Within this supercluster we are in a smaller group of galaxies called the Local Group. Earth is in the second largest galaxy of the Local Group – a galaxy called the Milky Way.

What is the closest galaxy to ours?

Canis Major Dwarf Galaxy

Can humans travel to another galaxy?

The technology required to travel between galaxies is far beyond humanity’s present capabilities, and currently only the subject of speculation, hypothesis, and science fiction. However, theoretically speaking, there is nothing to conclusively indicate that intergalactic travel is impossible.

Which is the largest galaxy in the universe?

The biggest known galaxy is IC 1101, which is 50 times the Milky Way’s size and about 2,000 times more massive. It is about 5.5 million light-years across. Nebulas, or vast clouds of gas, also have impressively large sizes.

Which is the biggest universe?

A new report in 2014 confirms the Milky Way as a member of Laniakea Supercluster. Caelum Supercluster is a collection of over 550,000 galaxies. It is the largest of all galaxy superclusters. Saraswati Supercluster consists of 43 massive galaxy clusters, which include Abell 2361 and ZWCl 2341.1+0000.

What is the brightest star in the universe?

It’s always easy to spot as the brightest point of light in its region of sky (unless a planet happens to be near it, which none are in early 2021). Although white to blue-white in color, Sirius might be called a rainbow star, as it often flickers with many colors.

What is the hottest star color?

Blue stars

What is bigger than a galaxy?

A supercluster is a large group of smaller galaxy clusters or galaxy groups; it is among the largest known structures of the universe.

What is larger than the universe?

Cosmos At Least 250x Bigger Than Visible Universe, Say Cosmologists. The universe is much bigger than it looks, according to a study of the latest observations. When we look out into the Universe, the stuff we can see must be close enough for light to have reached us since the Universe began.

Why is the universe so big?

In between the galaxy groups and clusters in the Universe lies the majority of its volume, and it’s mostly empty space. A map of more than one milion galaxies in the Universe, where each dot is its own galaxy. But the reason the Universe is this large today is because it’s expanded and cooled to reach this point.

In our own backyard, the Universe is full of stars. But go more than about 100,000 light years away, and you’ve left the Milky Way behind. Beyond that, there’s a sea of galaxies: perhaps two trillion in total contained in our observable Universe.

Does the universe end?

The end result is unknown; a simple estimation would have all the matter and space-time in the universe collapse into a dimensionless singularity back into how the universe started with the Big Bang, but at these scales unknown quantum effects need to be considered (see Quantum gravity).

What was before the universe?

The initial singularity is a singularity predicted by some models of the Big Bang theory to have existed before the Big Bang and thought to have contained all the energy and spacetime of the Universe.

1

: the whole body of things and phenomena observed or postulated : cosmos: such as

a

: a systematic whole held to arise by and persist through the direct intervention of divine power

b

: the world of human experience

c(1)

: the entire celestial cosmos

(3)

: an aggregate of stars comparable to the Milky Way galaxy

2

: a distinct field or province of thought or reality that forms a closed system or self-inclusive and independent organization

4

: a set that contains all elements relevant to a particular discussion or problem

5

: a great number or quantity

a large enough universe of stocks … to choose fromG. B. Clairmont

Synonyms

Example Sentences



How many stars are there in the universe?



It means more to me than anything else in the entire universe.



She is convinced that parallel universes exist.



He creates his own universe in his novels.



New York City is the center of the publishing universe.

Recent Examples on the Web

April 8, 2023 Cryptocurrency ETFs are the top-performing class in the ETF universe.


WSJ, 9 Apr. 2023





Even very young galaxies in the early universe are made up of dust.


Julia Musto, Fox News, 8 Apr. 2023





Finally, the child stars of the upcoming Skeleton Crew, which looks sort of like Stranger Things in the Star Wars universe, were revealed to be Ravi Cabot-Conyers, Kyriana Kratter, and Robert Timothy Smith.


Brendan Morrow, The Week, 7 Apr. 2023





The character returned in the sequel series Star Wars Rebels (2014-2018) as a member of the Rebel Alliance, operating under the codename Fulcrum, and made numerous other cameo appearances in the extended Star Wars universe.


Jennifer Ouellette, Ars Technica, 7 Apr. 2023





This is another entry in Sony’s Spider-Man-villains-without-Spider-man universe.


Good Housekeeping, 6 Apr. 2023





The majority of people in the Cowboys’ universe tell you quarterback Dak Prescott will get a contract extension.


Calvin Watkins, Dallas News, 5 Apr. 2023





The best that there is in the whole universe.


John Hopewell, Variety, 5 Apr. 2023





Many consumers — and regulators — aren’t happy with the way scammers have been able to walk through a loophole in the banking universe.


Susan Tompor, Detroit Free Press, 4 Apr. 2023



See More

These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word ‘universe.’ Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.

Word History

Etymology

Middle English, from Latin universum, from neuter of universus entire, whole, from uni- + versus turned toward, from past participle of vertere to turn — more at worth

First Known Use

1589, in the meaning defined at sense 1

Time Traveler

The first known use of universe was
in 1589

Dictionary Entries Near universe

Cite this Entry

“Universe.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/universe. Accessed 14 Apr. 2023.

Share

More from Merriam-Webster on universe

Last Updated:
13 Apr 2023
— Updated example sentences

Subscribe to America’s largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Merriam-Webster unabridged

The Universe is all of space including everything that exists. Our planet, all other planets in existence, stars, and galaxies are all part of the universe. It was born more than thirteen billion years ago in the Big Bang. Scientists say that it is at least ten billion light-years in diameter. In this sense, the Universe means the cosmos.

The Universe is all time and space, i.e., spacetime. It includes all the galaxies, stars, planets, moons, and all other forms of energy and matter.

My universe,’ however, may refer to the world that is familiar to me. If I say, for example, “My family is my whole universe,” I mean that my family is my world.

The term may also mean a large number or quantity, as in: “We have a large enough universe of stocks to select from.”

When we talk about parallel universes, the term means realities. Some scientists believe there are parallel universes, i.e., other plains of existence. In fact, some physicists say that ours could be one out of an infinite number of universes.

The Cambridge Dictionary has the following three meanings of the word:

“1. Everything that exists, especially all physical matter, including all the stars, planets, galaxies, etc. in space.”

“2. A universe that could be imagined to exist outside our own. 3. The world, or the world that you are familiar with.”


The universe in statistics

The universe represents the entire group of units on which the study is focusing. Thus, the universe could consist of everybody in the country or just those in a geographical location. It could also consist of people with a specific lifestyle or profession.


Universe in statistics

In statistics or market research, the term represents all possible elements in a set. The universe of consumers in a country, for example, means all the consumers in that country.

When carrying out market research, analyzing all the consumers in a country with a large population is impossible. It is impossible because there are too many of them. Therefore, statisticians select a statistical sample or representative sample.

A study of shoppers in the United States, for example, if one selected the universe of shoppers, would involve hundreds of millions of people. Such a study would be impossible. However, with a representative sample of, say, 20,000 shoppers, a comprehensive study is possible.

Regarding using the term in statistics or market research, AllBusiness.com writes:

“For the purpose of market research, a subset of the population called a sample is selected from the universe to be investigated.”

“In merchandising, all buyers of ski equipment would represent the total universe for ski equipment sales.”

Market research involves gathering and analyzing data on groups of people such as customers, suppliers, or competitors. Statistics, in this context, refers to facts that statisticians present in numerical form.

When carrying out household surveys, for example, the OECD says that ‘universe’ means the same as the population. For example, the population of shoppers means all shoppers. OECD stands for Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.


Etymology of universe

The etymology of a word is where it came from and how its meaning has evolved.

With the meaning “the whole world, cosmos, the totality of existing thing,” the English word ‘universe’ emerged in the 1580s.

It came from the Old French word Univers, which appeared in the twelfth century. The Old French word came from the Latin word Universum, meaning “all things, all people, everybody, the whole world.” Universum is the noun use of the adjective Universus, meaning “all in one, entire, whole, relating to all.”

The Latin word is a combination of Unus, meaning “one,” plus Versus, the past participle of Vertere. Vertere means “to turn, turn back, convert, transform, translate.”

The Universe

The Milky Way is our galaxy. It has between 200 and 400 billion stars and more than 100 billion planets. There are about 100 billion galaxies in the Universe. Surely, Earth cannot be the only place with life!


The Universe – space

In astronomy, the Universe means everything, everywhere, all the time. In other words, all of space, time, and their contents. It includes all the galaxies, black holes, stars, planets, and moons. It also includes all forms of energy and matter.

Stephen Hawking (1942-2018) once said:

“Look up at the stars and not down at your feet. Try to make sense of what you see, and wonder about what makes the Universe exist. Be curious.”

Professor Hawking was a British theoretical physicist, cosmologist, author, and director of research at the Centre for Theoretical Cosmology at Cambridge University.

In 2016, Prof. Hawking suggested that black holes might be portals to other universes. Perhaps black holes are not ‘eternal prisons’ from which anything their gravity captures never escapes. He wondered whether there might be a way out.

Greek and Indian philosophers

Scientific models of universes date back to ancient Greek and Indian philosophers. They drew geocentric models that had our planet Earth at the center of everything.

Copernicus and Newton

It was not until Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543), a Polish astronomer and mathematician, that heliocentric models emerged. Copernicus’ model had the Sun at the center of our Solar System.

Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) built on Copernicus’ work when he developed the law of universal gravitation. Newton was a British mathematician, astronomer, physicist, and theologian.

Eventually, models started locating our Solar System within the Milky Way galaxy. The Milky Way is one of the cosmos’ approximately one-hundred billion galaxies.

Astronomers and astrophysicists say that the Universe has neither a center nor an edge. This is because the distribution of all the galaxies is even and the same in all directions.

According to a team of British scientists, the Universe is not spinning or stretching in any particular direction. It is expanding uniformly.

Universe has a beginning

Early in the 20th century, scientists discovered that the Universe was expanding and had a beginning.

Approximately 80% of the mass in the cosmos appears to exist in dark matter. We cannot observe dark matter, but we know it is there.


Big bang theory

The Big Bang theory is the cosmological model that most scientists believe regarding the Universe.

The model describes how our cosmos expanded from an extremely high-density and high-temperature state. The theory also explains why there is an abundance of light elements and CMB (cosmic wave background).

According to Wikipedia:

“If the known laws of physics are extrapolated to the highest density regime, the result is a singularity which is typically associated with the Big Bang.”

A singularity is a location in spacetime where a celestial body’s gravitational field becomes infinite. It becomes infinite in a way that doesn’t depend on the coordinate system.

Scientists believe that everything started from a singularity. However, they are not one-hundred percent certain. They are not certain because our current knowledge is insufficient to describe what the Universe was like at that time.

By measuring the expansion rate of the cosmos, scientists estimate that the Big Bang occurred about 13.8 billion years ago. Hence, the Universe is 13.8 billion years old.


The shape of the Universe

If we could step outside the cosmos and observe it, what would it look like? Scientists have struggled to find the answer to this question. They have taken many different measurements to determine the shape of the cosmos. They have also tried to determine whether it will come to an end.

Geometry of the cosmos

According to Albert Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, mass and energy curves and bends spacetime. By mass and energy, Einstein meant gravity.

Therefore, the density of the cosmos, i.e., how much mass there is spread over its volume, determines what it looks like. Not only does it determine its shape, but also its future.

According to Space.com:

“Scientists have calculated the ‘critical density’ of the universe. The critical density is proportional to the square of the Hubble constant, which is used in measuring the expansion rate of the universe.”

“Comparing the critical density to the actual density can help scientists to understand the cosmos.”


Video – the Universe

What is the Universe made of? Stuff that we can see makes up a small part of the mass of the cosmos. In fact, what we can see makes up just five percent of everything. So, what about the other ninety-five percent? That consists of Dark Matter and Dark Energy.


Meaning Universe

What does Universe mean? Here you find 41 meanings of the word Universe. You can also add a definition of Universe yourself

1

0

 
0

All of the observable phenomena in the celestial cosmos.

2

0

 
0

Universe

Univers

3

0

 
0

Universe

1580s, «the whole world, cosmos, the totality of existing things,» from Old French univers (12c.), from Latin universum «all things, everybody, all people, the whole world,» noun u [..]

4

0

 
0

Universe

Click for a picture Map of the main super-clusters of galaxies in an area covering about 7% of the observable universe (Source: Daily Galaxy: http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/01/map-of-the-un [..]

5

0

 
0

Universe

all known matter, energy, and space.

6

0

 
0

Universe

In statistical terminology, synonymous with population.

7

0

 
0

Universe

In the world of investments, the word universe refers to a specific group or category of investments that share certain characteristics. A universe might be the stocks that are included in a particular index, the stocks evaluated by a particular analytical service, or all of the stocks in a particular industry.

8

0

 
0

Universe

The totality of space and time, along with all the matter and energy in it. Current theories assert that the universe is expanding and that all its matter and energy was created during the Big Bang.

9

0

 
0

Universe

The total number of units (for example, individuals, households, or businesses) in the population of interest.

10

0

 
0

Universe

(see also Survey universe

11

0

 
0

Universe

everything that exists anywhere; "they study the evolution of the universe"; "the biggest tree in existence" population: (statistics) the entire agg [..]

12

0

 
0

Universe

all the objects under consideration. The same word also means all existing things.

13

0

 
0

Universe

The totality of space and time, along with all the matter and energy in it. Current theories assert that the universe is expanding and that all its matter and energy was created during the Big Bang.

14

0

 
0

Universe

Everything that exists. The size of the observable Universe is determined by the distance light has travelled since the Universe was formed in the Big Bang, 12 — 15 billion years ago.

15

0

 
0

Universe

noun. With regard to statistics, reference: population.

16

0

 
0

Universe

univers

17

0

 
0

Universe

The vast expanse of space which contains all of the matter and energy in existence.

18

0

 
0

Universe

The Cosmic World.

19

0

 
0

Universe

Everything that is?all energy, matter, and space.

20

0

 
0

Universe

The Universe is made up of everything that exists, including planets, stars, galaxies and all forms of matter and energy.

21

0

 
0

Universe

All matter and energy, including all of the galaxies and the space between galaxies, taken as a whole.

22

0

 
0

Universe

The Universe in which we live consists of several hundred billion galaxies. These galaxies are grouped as superclusters and clusters. Astronomers currently favour the Big-Bang theory of the origin of [..]

23

0

 
0

Universe

the whole world.

24

0

 
0

Universe

The Universe in which we live consists of several hundred billion galaxies. These galaxies are grouped as superclusters and clusters. Astronomers currently favour the Big-Bang theory of the origin of [..]

25

0

 
0

Universe

(n) everything that exists anywhere(n) (statistics) the entire aggregation of items from which samples can be drawn(n) everything stated or assumed in a given discussion

26

0

 
0

Universe

All of the matter that physically exists (Lesson 31)

27

0

 
0

Universe

ADV in general terms| generally; in respect to the whole

28

0

 
0

Universe

The entire population to be measured. 

29

0

 
0

Universe

 Total population of audience being measured.  

30

0

 
0

Universe

The total number of units (for example, individuals, households, or businesses) in the population of interest.

31

0

 
0

Universe

all matter and space containing some million million galaxies UV (see ultraviolet)

32

0

 
0

Universe

(see also Survey universe

33

0

 
0

Universe

Part of the tempus kernel library, the Universe is a C++ class designed to represent a virtual universe

34

0

 
0

Universe

The population chosen for a study. For example the cable TV universe includes those homes that receive cable.

35

0

 
0

Universe

n. «(with in) universally,» s.v. universe OED. KEY: universe@n

36

0

 
0

Universe

n 1 universe 1

37

0

 
0

Universe

All that exists

38

0

 
0

Universe

A universe is the focus of a given data tabulation. For many Census tables, the universe is all Americans, but it is not always. For example, the Census Bureau specifically constrains tables about edu [..]

39

0

 
0

Universe

The totality of space and time, along with all the matter and energy in it. Current theories assert that the universe is expanding and that all its matter and energy was created during the Big Bang.

40

0

 
0

Universe

The total population of a particular audience category. BARB universes are based on television homes. For example, the network universe for ABC1 women is the total number of ABC1 women living within television households in the UK.

41

0

 
0

Universe

the sum of all space, matter, and energy that exist, that have existed in the past, and that will exist in the future

Dictionary.university is a dictionary written by people like you and me.
Please help and add a word. All sort of words are welcome!

Add meaning

Educalingo cookies are used to personalize ads and get web traffic statistics. We also share information about the use of the site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.

Download the app
educalingo

I have always believed that astrophysics should be the extrapolation of laboratory physics, that we must begin from the present universe and work our way backward to progressively more remote and uncertain epochs.

Hannes Alfven

section

ETYMOLOGY OF THE WORD UNIVERSE

From French univers, from Latin ūniversum the whole world, from ūniversus all together, from uni- + vertere to turn.

info

Etymology is the study of the origin of words and their changes in structure and significance.

facebooktwitterpinterestwhatsapp

section

PRONUNCIATION OF UNIVERSE

facebooktwitterpinterestwhatsapp

GRAMMATICAL CATEGORY OF UNIVERSE

Universe is a noun.

A noun is a type of word the meaning of which determines reality. Nouns provide the names for all things: people, objects, sensations, feelings, etc.

WHAT DOES UNIVERSE MEAN IN ENGLISH?

universe

Universe

The Universe is all of spacetime and everything that exists therein, including all planets, stars, galaxies, the contents of intergalactic space, the smallest subatomic particles, and all matter and energy. Similar terms include the cosmos, the world, reality, and nature. The observable universe is about 46 billion light years in radius. Scientific observation of the Universe has led to inferences of its earlier stages. These observations suggest that the Universe has been governed by the same physical laws and constants throughout most of its extent and history. The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model that describes the early development of the Universe, which is calculated to have begun 13.798 ± 0.037 billion years ago. Observations of supernovae have shown that the Universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. There are many competing theories about the ultimate fate of the universe. Physicists remain unsure about what, if anything, preceded the Big Bang. Many refuse to speculate, doubting that any information from any such prior state could ever be accessible.


Definition of universe in the English dictionary

The first definition of universe in the dictionary is the aggregate of all existing matter, energy, and space. Other definition of universe is human beings collectively. Universe is also a province or sphere of thought or activity.

WORDS THAT RHYME WITH UNIVERSE

Synonyms and antonyms of universe in the English dictionary of synonyms

SYNONYMS OF «UNIVERSE»

The following words have a similar or identical meaning as «universe» and belong to the same grammatical category.

Translation of «universe» into 25 languages

online translator

TRANSLATION OF UNIVERSE

Find out the translation of universe to 25 languages with our English multilingual translator.

The translations of universe from English to other languages presented in this section have been obtained through automatic statistical translation; where the essential translation unit is the word «universe» in English.

Translator English — Chinese


宇宙

1,325 millions of speakers

Translator English — Spanish


universo

570 millions of speakers

English


universe

510 millions of speakers

Translator English — Hindi


ब्रह्मांड

380 millions of speakers

Translator English — Arabic


كَوْن

280 millions of speakers

Translator English — Russian


вселенная

278 millions of speakers

Translator English — Portuguese


universo

270 millions of speakers

Translator English — Bengali


বিশ্ব

260 millions of speakers

Translator English — French


univers

220 millions of speakers

Translator English — Malay


Alam semesta

190 millions of speakers

Translator English — German


Universum

180 millions of speakers

Translator English — Japanese


宇宙

130 millions of speakers

Translator English — Korean


우주

85 millions of speakers

Translator English — Javanese


Alam semesta

85 millions of speakers

Translator English — Vietnamese


vũ trụ

80 millions of speakers

Translator English — Tamil


பிரபஞ்சம்

75 millions of speakers

Translator English — Marathi


विश्व

75 millions of speakers

Translator English — Turkish


Evren

70 millions of speakers

Translator English — Italian


universo

65 millions of speakers

Translator English — Polish


wszechświat

50 millions of speakers

Translator English — Ukrainian


всесвіт

40 millions of speakers

Translator English — Romanian


univers

30 millions of speakers

Translator English — Greek


σύμπαν

15 millions of speakers

Translator English — Afrikaans


heelal

14 millions of speakers

Translator English — Swedish


universum

10 millions of speakers

Translator English — Norwegian


univers

5 millions of speakers

Trends of use of universe

TENDENCIES OF USE OF THE TERM «UNIVERSE»

The term «universe» is very widely used and occupies the 4.648 position in our list of most widely used terms in the English dictionary.

Trends

FREQUENCY

Very widely used

The map shown above gives the frequency of use of the term «universe» in the different countries.

Principal search tendencies and common uses of universe

List of principal searches undertaken by users to access our English online dictionary and most widely used expressions with the word «universe».

FREQUENCY OF USE OF THE TERM «UNIVERSE» OVER TIME

The graph expresses the annual evolution of the frequency of use of the word «universe» during the past 500 years. Its implementation is based on analysing how often the term «universe» appears in digitalised printed sources in English between the year 1500 and the present day.

Examples of use in the English literature, quotes and news about universe

10 QUOTES WITH «UNIVERSE»

Famous quotes and sentences with the word universe.

The ideas and practices of Franz Anton Mesmer, an 18th-century Australian healer, had spread to the United States and, by the 1840s, held the country in thrall. Mesmer proposed that everything in the universe, including the human body, was governed by a ‘magnetic fluid’ that could become imbalanced, causing illness.

I have always believed that astrophysics should be the extrapolation of laboratory physics, that we must begin from the present universe and work our way backward to progressively more remote and uncertain epochs.

The ability to reduce everything to simple fundamental laws does not imply the ability to start from those laws and reconstruct the universe.

Of course I believe in aliens. I think it’s very egocentric to think that there’s nothing else with intelligence in the whole universe.

That’s what Hubble can do for us. It can tell us whether the universe is expanding forever or if one day it’s going to come back together.

Having worked on ‘Halo: Nightfall’ and gotten a taste for what ‘Halo’ has to offer, it definitely has me interested in picking up the games and getting familiarized more with the ‘Halo’ universe.

Let no one underestimate the need of pity. We live in a stony universe whose hard, brilliant forces rage fiercely.

This planet seems to be in such sorry shape. And I can’t ever think about the rest of the universe without coming back home and thinking what the implications for life here would be if we were to really have some definitive proof of extraterrestrial life.

A mind at peace, a mind centered and not focused on harming others, is stronger than any physical force in the universe.

There are some jobs where you think, ‘There’s no way! This would be too, too good. The universe would love me too much were it to actually happen.’

10 ENGLISH BOOKS RELATING TO «UNIVERSE»

Discover the use of universe in the following bibliographical selection. Books relating to universe and brief extracts from same to provide context of its use in English literature.

Book 1 in the New York Times bestselling trilogy, perfect for fans of Battlestar Gallactica and Prometheus!

2

A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather than …

Provocative, challenging, and delightfully readable, this is a game-changing look at the most basic underpinning of existence and a powerful antidote to outmoded philosophical, religious, and scientific thinking.

3

The Last Book in the Universe

Like the award-winning novel Freak the Mighty, this is Philbrick at his very best. It’s the story of an epileptic teenager nicknamed Spaz, who begins the heroic fight to bring human intelligence back to the planet.

4

Einstein: His Life and Universe

By the author of the acclaimed bestsellers Benjamin Franklin and Steve Jobs, this is the definitive biography of Albert Einstein.

5

George’s Secret Key to the Universe

It’s the story of George, who’s taken through the vastness of space by a scientist, his daughter, and their super-computer named Cosmos.

Stephen Hawking, Lucy Hawking, 2011

6

Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the …

In this book Karen Barad puts her expertise in feminist studies and quantum physics to superb use, offering agential realism as an important alternative to representationalism.

7

At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of …

The author examines the concept of self-organization, or as he calls it «order for free,» discussing how it occurs more frequently in nature than originally believed

8

The Holographic Universe

Despite its apparent materiality, the universe is actually a kind of 3-D projection and is ultimately no more real than a hologram.

9

The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the …

The book takes us from the Greeks’ earliest scientific observations through Einstein and beyond in an inspiring celebration of human curiosity.

Leon Lederman, Dick Teresi, 2006

10

The Convoluted Universe

* Is it possible that you are living in other universes simultaneously with this one? * Do you travel back and forth between other dimensions without your conscious knowledge? * Could it be possible that you are only a splinter or fragment …

10 NEWS ITEMS WHICH INCLUDE THE TERM «UNIVERSE»

Find out what the national and international press are talking about and how the term universe is used in the context of the following news items.

Scientists believe there’s other life in the universe. Why haven’t we …

“The universe is apparently bulging at the seams with the ingredients of biology.” So says Geoffrey Marcy, an astronomer at the University of California at … «Washington Post, Jul 15»

7 Memorable Controversies Involving the Miss USA, Miss Universe

Alicia Machado and Tara Conner nearly lost their crowns after winning the Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants, and Miss USA and Miss Teen USA … «Hollywood Reporter, Jul 15»

Miss Universe defends keeping crown despite Trump row

Mr Trump had attacked Ms Vega for keeping her crown, saying: «Miss Universe, Paulina Vega, criticised me for telling the truth about illegal immigration, but then … «BBC News, Jul 15»

Miss Universe Paulina Vega Joins Chorus Slamming Donald Trump

The reigning Miss Universe joined a chorus of voices denouncing controversial remarks by the pageant’s owner, Donald Trump. “I find Mr. Trump’s comments … «ABC News, Jul 15»

Mexico Pulls Out of Donald Trump’s Miss Universe Pageant

Now, the country’s pageant organizers have decided they won’t send contestants to Trump’s Miss Universe pageant. Two weeks after the real estate mogul … «TIME, Jun 15»

Donald Trump pitches into Univision Miss Universe spat with golf …

Firing back at Univision for its refusal to air his Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants, the outspoken mogul and Republican presidential candidate Donald … «The Guardian, Jun 15»

Univision dumps Miss Universe, blames Trump

Even Donald Trump sometimes faces consequences for his words: Univision, the leading Spanish-language network, announced Thursday it’s dumping Trump’s … «USA TODAY, Jun 15»

Zayn Malik ‘Still In 1D … In Another Universe

Zayn Malik could still be in One Direction in a parallel universe, according to … that somewhere outside of our own universe lies another different universe. «Sky News, Apr 15»

How the Hubble Space Telescope has changed our view of the …

Since its launch on April 24, 1990, the telescope has helped us discover the age of the universe, how planets come to be and the fact that most galaxies have … «Los Angeles Times, Apr 15»

‘The Universe in a Mirror’ (US, 2008): Book Excerpt

Science Writer Robert Zimmerman is the author of «The Universe in a Mirror: The Saga of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Visionaries Who Built It» (2008, … «Space.com, Apr 15»

REFERENCE

« EDUCALINGO. Universe [online]. Available <https://educalingo.com/en/dic-en/universe>. Apr 2023 ».

Download the educalingo app


Discover all that is hidden in the words on educalingo

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • What is the meaning of the word tornado
  • What is the meaning of the word time zone
  • What is the meaning of the word theory
  • What is the meaning of the word theme
  • What is the meaning of the word the earth