What is the meaning of the word family

Family (from Latin: familia) is a group of people related either by consanguinity (by recognized birth) or affinity (by marriage or other relationship). The purpose of the family is to maintain the well-being of its members and of society. Ideally, families offer predictability, structure, and safety as members mature and learn to participate in the community.[1] Historically, most human societies use family as the primary locus of attachment, nurturance, and socialization.[2][3]

Anthropologists classify most family organizations as matrifocal (a mother and her children), patrifocal (a father and his children), conjugal (a wife, her husband, and children, also called the nuclear family), avuncular (a man, his sister, and her children), or extended (in addition to parents and children, may include grandparents, aunts, uncles, or cousins).

The field of genealogy aims to trace family lineages through history. The family is also an important economic unit studied in family economics. The word «families» can be used metaphorically to create more inclusive categories such as community, nationhood, and global village.

[edit]

One of the primary functions of the family involves providing a framework for the production and reproduction of persons biologically and socially. This can occur through the sharing of material substances (such as food); the giving and receiving of care and nurture (nurture kinship); jural rights and obligations; and moral and sentimental ties.[5][6] Thus, one’s experience of one’s family shifts over time. From the perspective of children, the family is a «family of orientation»: the family serves to locate children socially and plays a major role in their enculturation and socialization.[7] From the point of view of the parent(s), the family is a «family of procreation», the goal of which is to produce, enculturate and socialize children.[8] However, producing children is not the only function of the family; in societies with a sexual division of labor, marriage, and the resulting relationship between two people, it is necessary for the formation of an economically productive household.[9][10][11]

C. C. Harris notes that the western conception of family is ambiguous and confused with the household, as revealed in the different contexts in which the word is used.[12] Olivia Harris states this confusion is not accidental, but indicative of the familial ideology of capitalist, western countries that pass social legislation that insists members of a nuclear family should live together, and that those not so related should not live together; despite the ideological and legal pressures, a large percentage of families do not conform to the ideal nuclear family type.[13]

Size[edit]

Mennonite siblings, Montana, United States, 1937

The total fertility rate of women varies from country to country, from a high of 6.76 children born/woman in Niger to a low of 0.81 in Singapore (as of 2015).[14] Fertility is low in most Eastern European and Southern European countries, and high in most sub-Saharan African countries.[14]

In some cultures, the mother’s preference of family size influences that of the children through early adulthood.[15] A parent’s number of children strongly correlates with the number of children that their children will eventually have.[16]

Types[edit]

A German mother with her children in the 1960s

Although early western cultural anthropologists and sociologists considered family and kinship to be universally associated with relations by «blood» (based on ideas common in their own cultures) later research[5] has shown that many societies instead understand family through ideas of living together, the sharing of food (e.g. milk kinship) and sharing care and nurture. Sociologists have a special interest in the function and status of family forms in stratified (especially capitalist) societies.[17]

According to the work of scholars Max Weber, Alan Macfarlane, Steven Ozment, Jack Goody and Peter Laslett, the huge transformation that led to modern marriage in Western democracies was «fueled by the religio-cultural value system provided by elements of Judaism, early Christianity, Roman Catholic canon law and the Protestant Reformation».[18]

Much sociological, historical and anthropological research dedicates itself to the understanding of this variation, and of changes in the family that form over time. Levitan claims:

Times have changed; it is more acceptable and encouraged for mothers to work and fathers to spend more time at home with the children. The way roles are balanced between the parents will help children grow and learn valuable life lessons. There is [the] great importance of communication and equality in families, in order to avoid role strain.[19]

Multigenerational family[edit]

Historically, the most common family type was one in which grandparents, parents, and children lived together as a single unit. For example, the household might include the owners of a farm, one (or more) of their adult children, the adult child’s spouse, and the adult child’s own children (the owners’ grandchildren). Members of the extended family are not included in this family group. Sometimes, «skipped» generation families, such as a grandparents living with their grandchildren, are included.[20]

In the US, this arrangement declined after World War II, reaching a low point in 1980, when about one out of every eight people in the US lived in a multigenerational family.[20] The numbers have risen since then, with one in five people in the US living in a multigenerational family as of 2016.[21] The increasing popularity is partly driven by demographic changes and the economic shifts associated with the Boomerang Generation.[20]

Multigenerational households are less common in Canada, where about 6% of people living in Canada were living in multigenerational families as of 2016, but the proportion of multigenerational households was increasing rapidly, driven by increasing numbers of Aboriginal families, immigrant families, and high housing costs in some regions.[22]

Conjugal (nuclear) family[edit]

The term «nuclear family» is commonly used to refer to conjugal families. A «conjugal» family includes only the spouses and unmarried children who are not of age.[23][failed verification] Some sociologists[which?] distinguish between conjugal families (relatively independent of the kindred of the parents and of other families in general) and nuclear families (which maintain relatively close ties with their kindred).[24][25]

A father with his children in the United States in the 1940s

Other family structures – with (for example) blended parents, single parents, and domestic partnerships – have begun to challenge the normality of the nuclear family.[26][27][28]

Single-parent family[edit]

A single-parent family consists of one parent together with their children, where the parent is either widowed, divorced (and not remarried), or never married.[29] The parent may have sole custody of the children, or separated parents may have a shared-parenting arrangement where the children divide their time (possibly equally) between two different single-parent families or between one single-parent family and one blended family. As compared to sole custody, physical, mental and social well-being of children may be improved by shared-parenting arrangements and by children having greater access to both parents.[30][31] The number of single-parent families have been[when?] increasing, and about half of all children in the United States will live in a single-parent family at some point before they reach the age of 18. Most single-parent families are headed by a mother, but the number of single-parent families headed by fathers is increasing.[32][33]

Matrifocal family[edit]

A «matrifocal» family consists of a mother and her children.[34] Generally, these children are her biological offspring, although adoption of children occurs in nearly every society. This kind of family occurs commonly where women have the resources to rear their children by themselves, or where men are more mobile than women. As a definition, «a family or domestic group is matrifocal when it is centred on a woman and her children. In this case, the father(s) of these children are intermittently present in the life of the group and occupy a secondary place. The children’s mother is not necessarily the wife of one of the children’s fathers.»[35] The name, matrifocal, was coined in Guiana but it is defined differently in other countries. For Nayar families, the family have the male as the «center» or the head of the family, either the step-father/father/brother, rather than the mother.[34]

Extended family[edit]

Extended family with roots in Cape Town, Kimberley and Pretoria, South Africa

The term «extended family» is also common, especially in the United States. This term has two distinct meanings:

  1. It serves as a synonym of «consanguinal family» (consanguine means «of the same blood»).
  2. In societies dominated by the conjugal family, it refers to «kindred» (an egocentric network of relatives that extends beyond the domestic group) who do not belong to the conjugal family.

These types refer to ideal or normative structures found in particular societies. Any society will exhibit some variation in the actual composition and conception of families.[36]

Historically, extended families were the basic family unit in the Catholic culture and countries (such as Southern Europe and Latin America),[37] and in Asian, Middle Eastern and Eastern Orthodox countries.[37]

Family of choice[edit]

The term family of choice, also sometimes referred to as «chosen family» or «found family», is common within the LGBT community, veterans, individuals who have suffered abuse, and those who have no contact with biological «parents». It refers to the group of people in an individual’s life that satisfies the typical role of family as a support system. The term differentiates between the «family of origin» (the biological family or that in which people are raised) and those that actively assume that ideal role.[38]

The family of choice may or may not include some or all of the members of the family of origin. This family is not one that follows the «normal» familial structure like having a father, a mother, and children. This is family is a group of people that rely on each other like a family of origin would.[39] This terminology stems from the fact that many LGBT individuals, upon coming out, face rejection or shame from the families they were raised in.[40] The term family of choice is also used by individuals in the 12 step communities, who create close-knit «family» ties through the recovery process.

As a family system, families of choice face unique issues. Without legal safeguards, families of choice may struggle when medical, educational or governmental institutions fail to recognize their legitimacy.[40] If members of the chosen family have been disowned by their family of origin, they may experience surrogate grief, displacing anger, loss, or anxious attachment onto their new family.[40]

Blended family[edit]

The term blended family or stepfamily describes families with mixed parents: one or both parents remarried, bringing children of the former family into the new family.[41] Also in sociology, particularly in the works of social psychologist Michael Lamb,[42] traditional family refers to «a middle-class family with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their biological children,» and nontraditional to exceptions to this rule. Most of the US households are now non-traditional under this definition.[43] Critics of the term «traditional family» point out that in most cultures and at most times, the extended family model has been most common, not the nuclear family,[44] though it has had a longer tradition in England[45] than in other parts of Europe and Asia which contributed large numbers of immigrants to the Americas. The nuclear family became the most common form in the U.S. in the 1960s and 1970s.[46]

In terms of communication patterns in families, there are a certain set of beliefs within the family that reflect how its members should communicate and interact. These family communication patterns arise from two underlying sets of beliefs. One being conversation orientation (the degree to which the importance of communication is valued) and two, conformity orientation (the degree to which families should emphasize similarities or differences regarding attitudes, beliefs, and values).[47]

Blended families is complex, ranging from stepfamilies to cohabitating families (an individual living with guardians who are not married with step or half siblings). While it’s not too different from stepfamilies, cohabiting families pose a prevalent psychological effect on youths.[48] Some adolescents would be prone to «acts of delinquency,» and experiencing problems in school ranging from a decrease in academic performance to increased problematic behavior.  It coincides with other researches on the trajectories of stepfamilies where some experienced familyhood, but others lacking connection. Emotional detachment from members within stepfamilies contributes to this uncertainty, furthering the tension that these families may establish.[49] The transition from an old family to a new family that falls under blended families would also become problematic as the activities that were once performed in the old family may not transfer well within the new family for adolescents.[50]

Monogamous family[edit]

A monogamous family is based on a legal or social monogamy. In this case, an individual has only one (official) partner during their lifetime or at any one time (i.e. serial monogamy).[51] This means that a person may not have several different legal spouses at the same time, as this is usually prohibited by bigamy laws, (the act of entering into a marriage with one person while still legally married to another[52]) in jurisdictions that require monogamous marriages.

Polygamous family[edit]

Chinese immigrant with his three wives and fourteen children, Cairns, Australia, 1904

Polygamy is a marriage that includes more than two partners.[53][54] When a man is married to more than one wife at a time, the relationship is called polygyny; and when a woman is married to more than one husband at a time, it is called polyandry. If a marriage includes multiple husbands and wives, it can be called polyamory,[55] group or conjoint marriage.[54]

Polygyny is a form of plural marriage, in which a man is allowed more than one wife .[56] In modern countries that permit polygamy, polygyny is typically the only form permitted. Polygyny is practiced primarily (but not only) in parts of the Middle East and Africa; and is often associated with Islam, however, there are certain conditions in Islam that must be met to perform polygyny.[57]

Polyandry is a form of marriage whereby a woman takes two or more husbands at the same time.[58] Fraternal polyandry, where two or more brothers are married to the same wife, is a common form of polyandry. Polyandry was traditionally practiced in areas of the Himalayan mountains, among Tibetans in Nepal, in parts of China and in parts of northern India. Polyandry is most common in societies marked by high male mortality or where males will often be apart from the rest of the family for a considerable period of time.[58]

Kinship terminology[edit]

Degrees of kinship[edit]

Family in a wagon, Lee County, Mississippi, United States, August 1935.

A first-degree relative is one who shares 50% of your DNA through direct inheritance, such as a full sibling, parent or progeny.

There is another measure for the degree of relationship, which is determined by counting up generations to the first common ancestor and back down to the target individual, which is used for various genealogical and legal purposes.[59]

Kinship Degree of relationship
by coefficient
Coefficient of
relationship
Degree of relationship
by counting generations to common ancestor
identical twins 0 100%[60] second-degree
sister / brother first-degree 50% (2×2−2) second-degree
mother / father / daughter / son[61] first-degree 50% (2−1) first-degree
half-sister / half-brother second-degree 25% (2−2) second-degree
grandmother / grandfather / granddaughter / grandson second-degree 25% (2−2) second-degree
aunt / uncle / niece / nephew second-degree 25% (2×2−3) third-degree
half-aunt / half-uncle / half-niece / half-nephew third-degree 12.5% (2−3) third-degree
first-cousin third-degree 12.5% (2×2−4) fourth-degree
half-first-cousin fourth-degree 6.25% (2−4) fourth-degree
great-grandmother / great-grandfather / great-granddaughter / great-grandson third-degree 12.5% (2−3) third-degree
first-cousin-once-removed fourth-degree 6.25% (2⋅2−5) fifth-degree
second-cousin fifth-degree 3.125% (2−6+2−6) sixth-degree

Terminologies[edit]

Family tree with some family members.

Family tree with other family members.

Swedish family eating, 1902

In his book Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family, anthropologist Lewis Henry Morgan (1818–1881) performed the first survey of kinship terminologies in use around the world. Although much of his work is now considered dated, he argued that kinship terminologies reflect different sets of distinctions. For example, most kinship terminologies distinguish between sexes (the difference between a brother and a sister) and between generations (the difference between a child and a parent). Moreover, he argued, kinship terminologies distinguish between relatives by blood and marriage (although recently some anthropologists have argued that many societies define kinship in terms other than «blood»).

Morgan made a distinction between kinship systems that use classificatory terminology and those that use descriptive terminology. Classificatory systems are generally and erroneously understood to be those that «class together» with a single term relatives who actually do not have the same type of relationship to ego. (What defines «same type of relationship» under such definitions seems to be genealogical relationship. This is problematic given that any genealogical description, no matter how standardized, employs words originating in a folk understanding of kinship.) What Morgan’s terminology actually differentiates are those (classificatory) kinship systems that do not distinguish lineal and collateral relationships and those (descriptive) kinship systems that do. Morgan, a lawyer, came to make this distinction in an effort to understand Seneca inheritance practices. A Seneca man’s effects were inherited by his sisters’ children rather than by his own children.[62] Morgan identified six basic patterns of kinship terminologies:

  • Hawaiian: only distinguishes relatives based upon sex and generation.
  • Sudanese: no two relatives share the same term.
  • Eskimo: in addition to distinguishing relatives based upon sex and generation, also distinguishes between lineal relatives and collateral relatives.
  • Iroquois: in addition to sex and generation, also distinguishes between siblings of opposite sexes in the parental generation.
  • Crow: a matrilineal system with some features of an Iroquois system, but with a «skewing» feature in which generation is «frozen» for some relatives.
  • Omaha: like a Crow system but patrilineal.

Table of degrees of kinship.

Roles[edit]

Group photograph of a Norwegian family by Gustav Borgen ca. 1900: Father, mother, three sons and two daughters.

Father and child, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Most Western societies employ Eskimo kinship terminology.[63] This kinship terminology commonly occurs in societies with strong conjugal, where families have a degree of relative mobility. Typically, societies with conjugal families also favor neolocal residence; thus upon marriage, a person separates from the nuclear family of their childhood (family of orientation) and forms a new nuclear family (family of procreation). Such systems generally assume that the mother’s husband is also the biological father. The system uses highly descriptive terms for the nuclear family and progressively more classificatory as the relatives become more and more collateral.

Nuclear family[edit]

The system emphasizes the nuclear family. Members of the nuclear family use highly descriptive kinship terms, identifying directly only the husband, wife, mother, father, son, daughter, brother, and sister. All other relatives are grouped together into categories. Members of the nuclear family may be lineal or collateral. Kin, for whom these are family, refer to them in descriptive terms that build on the terms used within the nuclear family or use the nuclear family term directly.

Nuclear family of orientation

  • Brother: the male child of a parent.
  • Sister: the female child of a parent.
  • Father: a male parent.
    • Grandfather: the father of a parent.
  • Mother: a female parent.
    • Grandmother: the mother of a parent.

Nuclear conjugal family

  • Husband: a male spouse.
  • Wife: a female spouse.
  • Son: a male child of the parent(s).
    • Grandson: a child’s son.
  • Daughter: a female child of the parent(s).
    • Granddaughter: a child’s daughter.

Nuclear non-lineal family

  • Spouse: husband or wife
    • Stepparent: a spouse of a parent that is not a biological parent
  • Sibling: sister or brother
    • Half-sibling: a sibling with whom the subject shares only one biological parent
    • Step-sibling: a child of a parent that is not a biological parent

Collateral relatives[edit]

A sibling is a collateral relative with a minimal removal. For collateral relatives with one additional removal, one generation more distant from a common ancestor on one side, more classificatory terms come into play. These terms (Aunt, Uncle, Niece, and Nephew) do not build on the terms used within the nuclear family as most are not traditionally members of the household. These terms do not traditionally differentiate between a collateral relatives and a person married to a collateral relative (both collateral and aggregate). Collateral relatives with additional removals on each side are Cousins. This is the most classificatory term and can be distinguished by degrees of collaterality and by generation (removal).

When only the subject has the additional removal, the relative is the subject’s parents’ siblings, the terms Aunt and Uncle are used for female and male relatives respectively. When only the relative has the additional removal, the relative is the subjects siblings child, the terms Niece and Nephew are used for female and male relatives respectively. The spouse of a biological aunt or uncle is an aunt or uncle, and the nieces and nephews of a spouse are nieces and nephews. With further removal by the subject for aunts and uncles and by the relative for nieces and nephews the prefix «grand-» modifies these terms. With further removal the prefix becomes «great-grand-,» adding another «great-» for each additional generation. For large numbers of generations a number can be substituted, for example, «fourth great-grandson», «four-greats grandson» or «four-times-great-grandson».

When the subject and the relative have an additional removal they are cousins. A cousin with minimal removal is a first cousin, i.e. the child of the subjects uncle or aunt. Degrees of collaterality and removals are used to more precisely describe the relationship between cousins. The degree is the number of generations subsequent to the common ancestor before a parent of one of the cousins is found, while the removal is the difference between the number of generations from each cousin to the common ancestor (the difference between the generations the cousins are from).[64][65]

Cousins of an older generation (in other words, one’s parents’ first cousins), although technically first cousins once removed, are often classified with «aunts» and «uncles».

Aggregate relatives[edit]

English-speakers mark relationships by marriage (except for wife/husband) with the tag «-in-law». The mother and father of one’s spouse become one’s mother-in-law and father-in-law; the wife of one’s son becomes one’s daughter-in-law and the husband of one’s daughter becomes one’s son-in-law. The term «sister-in-law» refers to two essentially different relationships, either the wife of one’s brother, or the sister of one’s spouse. «Brother-in-law» is the husband of one’s sister, or the brother of one’s spouse. The terms «half-brother» and «half-sister» indicate siblings who share only one biological parent. The term «aunt-in-law» is the wife of one’s uncle, or the aunt of one’s spouse. «Uncle-in-law» is the husband of one’s aunt, or the uncle of one’s spouse. «Cousin-in-law» is the spouse of one’s cousin, or the cousin of one’s spouse. The term «niece-in-law» is the wife of one’s nephew, or the niece of one’s spouse. «Nephew-in-law» is the husband of one’s niece, or the nephew of one’s spouse. The grandmother and grandfather of one’s spouse become one’s grandmother-in-law and grandfather-in-law; the wife of one’s grandson becomes one’s granddaughter-in-law and the husband of one’s granddaughter becomes one’s grandson-in-law.

In Indian English a sibling in law who is the spouse of your sibling can be referred to as a co-sibling (specificity a co-sister[66] or co-brother[67]).

Types of kinship[edit]

Patrilineal[edit]

Patrilineality, also known as the male line or agnatic kinship, is a form of kinship system in which an individual’s family membership derives from and is traced through his or her father’s lineage.[68] It generally involves the inheritance of property, rights, names, or titles by persons related through male kin.

A patriline («father line») is a person’s father, and additional ancestors that are traced only through males. One’s patriline is thus a record of descent from a man in which the individuals in all intervening generations are male. In cultural anthropology, a patrilineage is a consanguineal male and female kinship group, each of whose members is descended from the common ancestor through male forebears.

Matrilineal[edit]

Matrilineality is a form of kinship system in which an individual’s family membership derives from and is traced through his or her mother’s lineage.

It may also correlate with a societal system in which each person is identified with their matriline—their mother’s lineage—and which can involve the inheritance of property and titles. A matriline is a line of descent from a female ancestor to a descendant in which the individuals in all intervening generations are mothers – in other words, a «mother line».

In a matrilineal descent system, an individual is considered to belong to the same descent group as her or his mother. This matrilineal descent pattern is in contrasts to the more common pattern of patrilineal descent pattern.

Bilateral descent[edit]

Bilateral descent is a form of kinship system in which an individual’s family membership derives from and is traced through both the paternal and maternal sides. The relatives on the mother’s side and father’s side are equally important for emotional ties or for transfer of property or wealth. It is a family arrangement where descent and inheritance are passed equally through both parents.[69] Families who use this system trace descent through both parents simultaneously and recognize multiple ancestors, but unlike with cognatic descent it is not used to form descent groups.[70]

Traditionally, this is found among some groups in West Africa, India, Australia, Indonesia, Melanesia, Malaysia and Polynesia. Anthropologists believe that a tribal structure based on bilateral descent helps members live in extreme environments because it allows individuals to rely on two sets of families dispersed over a wide area.[71]

History of theories[edit]

Early scholars of family history applied Darwin’s biological theory of evolution in their theory of evolution of family systems.[72] American anthropologist Lewis H. Morgan published Ancient Society in 1877 based on his theory of the three stages of human progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization.[73] Morgan’s book was the «inspiration for Friedrich Engels’ book» The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State published in 1884.[74]

Engels expanded Morgan’s hypothesis that economical factors caused the transformation of primitive community into a class-divided society.[75] Engels’ theory of resource control, and later that of Karl Marx, was used to explain the cause and effect of change in family structure and function. The popularity of this theory was largely unmatched until the 1980s, when other sociological theories, most notably structural functionalism, gained acceptance.

The nuclear family in industrial society[edit]

Family arrangements in the United States have become more diverse with no particular household arrangement representing half of the United States population.[76]

Contemporary society generally views the family as a haven from the world, supplying absolute fulfillment. Zinn and Eitzen discuss the image of the «family as haven … a place of intimacy, love and trust where individuals may escape the competition of dehumanizing forces in modern society».[77]

During industrialization, «[t]he family as a repository of warmth and tenderness (embodied by the mother) stands in opposition to the competitive and aggressive world of commerce (embodied by the father). The family’s task was to protect against the outside world.»[78] However, Zinn and Eitzen note, «The protective image of the family has waned in recent years as the ideals of family fulfillment have taken shape. Today, the family is more compensatory than protective. It supplies what is vitally needed but missing in other social arrangements.»[78]

«The popular wisdom», according to Zinn and Eitzen, sees the family structures of the past as superior to those today, and families as more stable and happier at a time when they did not have to contend with problems such as illegitimate children and divorce. They respond to this, saying, «there is no golden age of the family gleaming at us in the far back historical past.»[79] «Desertion by spouses, illegitimate children, and other conditions that are considered characteristics of modern times existed in the past as well.»[79]

The postmodern family[edit]

Percentage of births to unmarried women, selected countries, 1980 and 2007[80]

Others argue that whether or not one views the family as «declining» depends on one’s definition of «family». «Married couples have dropped below half of all American households. This drop is shocking from traditional forms of the family system. Only a fifth of households were following traditional ways of having married couples raising a family together.»[81] In the Western World, marriages are no longer arranged for economic, social or political gain, and children are no longer expected to contribute to family income. Instead, people choose mates based on love.[82] This increased role of love indicates a societal shift toward favoring emotional fulfilment and relationships within a family, and this shift necessarily weakens the institution of the family.[83]

Margaret Mead considers the family as a main safeguard to continuing human progress. Observing, «Human beings have learned, laboriously, to be human», she adds: «we hold our present form of humanity on trust, [and] it is possible to lose it» … «It is not without significance that the most successful large-scale abrogations of the family have occurred not among simple savages, living close to the subsistence edge, but among great nations and strong empires, the resources of which were ample, the populations huge, and the power almost unlimited»[84]

Many countries (particularly Western) have, in recent years, changed their family laws in order to accommodate diverse family models. For instance, in the United Kingdom, in Scotland, the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 provides cohabitants with some limited rights.[85] In 2010, Ireland enacted the Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010. There have also been moves at an international level, most notably, the Council of Europe European Convention on the Legal Status of Children Born out of Wedlock[86] which came into force in 1978. Countries which ratify it must ensure that children born outside marriage are provided with legal rights as stipulated in the text of this convention. The convention was ratified by the UK in 1981 and by Ireland in 1988.[87]

In the United States, one in five mothers has children by different fathers; among mothers with two or more children the figure is higher, with 28% having children with at least two different men. Such families are more common among Blacks and Hispanics and among the lower socioeconomic class.[88]

However, in western society, the single parent family has been growing more accepted and has begun to make an impact on culture. Single parent families are more commonly single mother families than single father.[89] These families sometimes face difficult issues besides the fact that they have to rear their children on their own, for example, low income making it difficult to pay for rent, child care, and other necessities for a healthy and safe home.

Furthermore, there are families that consist of two mothers, two fathers, non-binary, trans, and queer folks raising children. This is made possible due to surrogacy, IVF, IUI, adoption, and other processes.

Domestic violence[edit]

Domestic violence (DV) is violence that happens within the family. The legal and social understanding of the concept of DV differs by culture. The definition of the term «domestic violence» varies, depending on the context in which it is used.[90] It may be defined differently in medical, legal, political or social contexts. The definitions have varied over time, and vary in different parts of the world.

The Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence states that:[91]

«domestic violence» shall mean all acts of physical, sexual, psychological or economic violence that occur within the family or domestic unit or between former or current spouses or partners, whether or not the perpetrator shares or has shared the same residence with the victim.

In 1993, the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women identified domestic violence as one of three contexts in which violence against women occurs, describing it as:[92]

Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including battering, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non-spousal violence and violence related to exploitation.

Family violence[edit]

Family violence is a broader definition, often used to include child abuse, elder abuse, and other violent acts between family members.[93]

Child abuse is defined by the WHO as:[94]

Child maltreatment, sometimes referred to as child abuse and neglect, includes all forms of physical and emotional ill-treatment, sexual abuse, neglect, and exploitation that results in actual or potential harm to the child’s health, development or dignity. Within this broad definition, five subtypes can be distinguished – physical abuse; sexual abuse; neglect and negligent treatment; emotional abuse; and exploitation.

There exists legislation to prevent and punish the occurrence of these offences. There are laws regarding familial sexual activity, which states that it is a criminal offence to have any kind of sexual relationship between one’s grandparent, parent, sibling, aunt or uncle.[95][96]

Elder abuse is, according to the WHO: «a single, or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust which causes harm or distress to an older person».[97]

Parental abuse of children (child abuse)[edit]

Child abuse is the physical, sexual or emotional maltreatment or neglect of a child or children.[98] In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Department for Children and Families (DCF) define child maltreatment as any act or series of acts of commission or omission by a parent or other caregiver that results in harm, potential for harm, or threat of harm to a child.[99] Child abuse can occur in a child’s home, or in the organizations, schools or communities the child interacts with. There are four major categories of child abuse: neglect, physical abuse, psychological or emotional abuse, and sexual abuse.

Parental abuse by children[edit]

Abuse of parents by their children is a common but under reported and under-researched subject. A factor why this subject is under-researched is because of the overshadowing effect caused by parents abusing their children instead. Parents are quite often subject to levels of childhood aggression in excess of normal childhood aggressive outbursts, typically in the form of verbal or physical abuse. Parents feel a sense of shame and humiliation to have that problem, so they rarely seek help and it is usually little or no help available anyway.[100][101]

Elder abuse[edit]

Elder abuse is «a single, or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust, which causes harm or distress to an older person».[102] This definition has been adopted by the World Health Organization from a definition put forward by Action on Elder Abuse in the UK. Laws protecting the elderly from abuse are similar to, and related to, laws protecting dependent adults from abuse.

The core element to the harm of elder abuse is the «expectation of trust» of the older person toward their abuser. Thus, it includes harms by people the older person knows or with whom they have a relationship, such as a spouse, partner or family member, a friend or neighbor, or people that the older person relies on for services. Many forms of elder abuse are recognized as types of domestic violence or family violence.

Forced and child marriage[edit]

Forced and child marriages are practiced in certain regions of the world, particularly in Asia and Africa, and these types of marriages are associated with a high rate of domestic violence.[103][104][105][106]

A forced marriage is a marriage where one or both participants are married without their freely given consent.[107] The line between forced marriage and consensual marriage may become blurred, because the social norms of many cultures dictate that one should never oppose the desire of one’s parents/relatives in regard to the choice of a spouse; in such cultures it is not necessary for violence, threats, intimidation etc. to occur, the person simply «consents» to the marriage even if he/she doesn’t want it, out of the implied social pressure and duty. The customs of bride price and dowry, that exist in parts of the world, can lead to buying and selling people into marriage.[108][109]

A child marriage is a marriage where one or both spouses are under 18.[110][103] Child marriage was common throughout history but is today condemned by international human rights organizations.[111][112][113] Child marriages are often arranged between the families of the future bride and groom, sometimes as soon as the girl is born.[111] Child marriages can also occur in the context of marriage by abduction.[111]

The concept of family honour[edit]

Family honor is an abstract concept involving the perceived quality of worthiness and respectability that affects the social standing and the self-evaluation of a group of related people, both corporately and individually.[114][115] The family is viewed as the main source of honor and the community highly values the relationship between honor and the family.[116] The conduct of family members reflects upon family honor and the way the family perceives itself, and is perceived by others.[115] In cultures of honor maintaining the family honor is often perceived as more important than either individual freedom, or individual achievement.[117] In extreme cases, engaging in acts that are deemed to tarnish the honor of the family results in honor killings. An honor killing is the homicide of a member of a family or social group by other members, due to the perpetrators’ belief that the victim has brought shame or dishonor upon the family or community, usually for reasons such as refusing to enter an arranged marriage, being in a relationship that is disapproved by their relatives, having sex outside marriage, becoming the victim of rape, dressing in ways which are deemed inappropriate, or engaging in homosexual relations.[118][119][120][121][122]

Economic issues[edit]

A family is often part of a sharing economy with common ownership.

Dowry, bride price and dower[edit]

A traditional, formal presentation of the bride price at a Thai engagement ceremony.

Dowry is property (money, goods, or estate) that a wife or wife’s family gives to her husband when the wife and husband marry.[123] Offering dowry was common in many cultures historically (including in Europe and North America), but this practice today is mostly restricted to some areas primarily in the Indian subcontinent.

Bride price, (also bride wealth or bride token), is property paid by the groom or his family to the parents of a woman upon the marriage of their daughter to the groom. It is practiced mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa, parts of South-East Asia (Thailand, Cambodia), and parts of Central Asia.

Dower is property given to the bride herself by the groom at the time of marriage, and which remains under her ownership and control.[124]

Property regimes and taxation[edit]

In some countries married couples benefit from various taxation advantages not available to a single person or to unmarried couples. For example, spouses may be allowed to average their combined incomes. Some jurisdictions recognize common law marriage or de facto relations for this purposes. In some jurisdictions there is also an option of civil partnership or domestic partnership.

Different property regimes exist for spouses. In many countries, each marriage partner has the choice of keeping their property separate or combining properties. In the latter case, called community property, when the marriage ends by divorce each owns half. In lieu of a will or trust, property owned by the deceased generally is inherited by the surviving spouse.

Rights and laws[edit]

Reproductive rights[edit]

Reproductive rights are legal rights and freedoms relating to reproduction and reproductive health. These include the right to decide on issues regarding the number of children born, family planning, contraception, and private life, free from coercion and discrimination; as well as the right to access health services and adequate information.[125][126][127][128] According to UNFPA, reproductive rights «include the right to decide the number, timing and spacing of children, the right to voluntarily marry and establish a family, and the right to the highest attainable standard of health, among others».[129] Family planning refers to the factors that may be considered by individuals and couples in order for them to control their fertility, anticipate and attain the desired number of children and the spacing and timing of their births.[130][131]

The state and church have been, and still are in some countries, involved in controlling the size of families, often using coercive methods, such as bans on contraception or abortion (where the policy is a natalist one—for example through tax on childlessness) or conversely, discriminatory policies against large families (e.g., China’s one-child policy in place from 1978 to 2015) or even forced abortions. Forced sterilization has often targeted ethnic minority groups, such as Roma women in Eastern Europe,[132][133] or indigenous women in Peru (during the 1990s).[134]

Parents’ rights[edit]

The parents’ rights movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues affecting parents and children related to family law, specifically parental rights and obligations. Mothers’ rights movements focus on maternal health, workplace issues such as labor rights, breastfeeding, and rights in family law. The fathers’ rights movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to family law, including child custody and child support, that affect fathers and their children.[135]

Children’s rights[edit]

Children’s rights are the human rights of children, with particular attention to the rights of special protection and care afforded to minors, including their right to association with both parents, their right to human identity, their right to be provided in regard to their other basic needs, and their right to be free from violence and abuse.[136][137][138]

Marriage rights[edit]

Each jurisdiction has its own marriage laws. These laws differ significantly from country to country; and these laws are often controversial. Areas of controversy include women’s rights as well as same-sex marriage.

Legal reforms[edit]

Legal reforms to family laws have taken place in many countries during the past few decades. These dealt primarily with gender equality within marriage and with divorce laws. Women have been given equal rights in marriage in many countries, reversing older family laws based on the dominant legal role of the husband. Coverture, which was enshrined in the common law of England and the US for several centuries and throughout most of the 19th century, was abolished. In some European countries the changes that lead to gender equality were slower. The period of 1975–1979 saw a major overhaul of family laws in countries such as Italy,[139][140] Spain,[141] Austria,[142] West Germany,[143][144] and Portugal.[145] In 1978, the Council of Europe passed the Resolution (78) 37 on equality of spouses in civil law.[146] Among the last European countries to establish full gender equality in marriage were Switzerland. In 1985, a referendum guaranteed women legal equality with men within marriage.[147][148] The new reforms came into force in January 1988.[149] In Greece, in 1983, legislation was passed guaranteeing equality between spouses, abolishing dowry, and ending legal discrimination against illegitimate children.[150][151] In 1981, Spain abolished the requirement that married women must have their husbands’ permission to initiate judicial proceedings[152] the Netherlands,[153][154] and France[note 1] in the 1980s. In recent decades, the marital power has also been abolished in African countries that had this doctrine, but many African countries that were former French colonies still have discriminatory laws in their marriages regulations, such regulations originating in the Napoleonic Code that has inspired these laws.[152] In some countries (predominantly Roman Catholic) divorce was legalized only recently (e.g. Italy (1970), Portugal (1975), Brazil (1977), Spain (1981), Argentina (1987), Ireland (1996), Chile (2004) and Malta (2011)) although annulment and legal separation were options. The Philippines still does not allow divorce. (see Divorce law by country). The laws pertaining to the situation of children born outside marriage have also been revised in many countries (see Legitimacy (family law)).

Health[edit]

Global maternal mortality rate per 100 000 live births, (2010)[157]

Family medicine[edit]

Family medicine is a medical specialty devoted to comprehensive health care for people of all ages; it is based on knowledge of the patient in the context of the family and the community, emphasizing disease prevention and health promotion.[158] The importance of family medicine is being increasingly recognized.[159]

World infant mortality rates in 2012[160]

Maternal mortality[edit]

Maternal mortality or maternal death is defined by WHO as «the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causes.»[161] Historically, maternal mortality was a major cause of women’s death. In recent decades, advances in healthcare have resulted in rates of maternal mortality having dropped dramatically, especially in Western countries. Maternal mortality however remains a serious problem in many African and Asian counties.[161][162]

Infant and child mortality[edit]

Infant mortality is the death of a child less than one year of age. Child mortality is the death of a child before the child’s fifth birthday. Like maternal mortality, infant and child mortality were common throughout history, but have decreased significantly in modern times.[163][164]

Politics[edit]

Parents with child statue, Hrobákova street, Petržalka, Bratislava

While in many parts of the world family policies seek to promote a gender-equal organization of the family life, in others the male-dominated family continues to be the official policy of the authorities, which is also supported by law. For instance, the Civil Code of Iran states at Article 1105: «In relations between husband and wife; the position of the head of the family is the exclusive right of the husband».[165]

In some parts of the world, some governments promote a specific form of family, such as that based on traditional family values. The term «family values» is often used in political discourse in some countries, its general meaning being that of traditional or cultural values that pertain to the family’s structure, function, roles, beliefs, attitudes, and ideals, usually involving the «traditional family»—a middle-class family with a breadwinner father and a homemaker mother, raising their biological children. Any deviation from this family model is considered a «nontraditional family».[166] These family ideals are often advanced through policies such as marriage promotion. Some jurisdictions outlaw practices which they deem as socially or religiously unacceptable, such as fornication, cohabitation or adultery.

Work–family balance[edit]

Work–family balance is a concept involving proper prioritizing between work/career and family life. It includes issues relating to the way how work and families intersect and influence each other. At a political level, it is reflected through policies such maternity leave and paternity leave. Since the 1950s, social scientists as well as feminists have increasingly criticized gendered arrangements of work and care, and the male breadwinner role, and policies are increasingly targeting men as fathers, as a tool of changing gender relations.[167]

Protection of private and family life[edit]

Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one’s «private and family life, his home and his correspondence», subject to certain restrictions that are «in accordance with law» and «necessary in a democratic society».[168]

Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedom of others.

Criticism[edit]

An early opponent of the family was Socrates whose position was outlined by Plato in The Republic.[169] In Book 5 of The Republic, Socrates tells his interlocutors that a just city is one in which citizens have no family ties.[170][171]

The family being such a deep-rooted and much-venerated institution, few intellectuals have ventured to speak against it. Familialism has been atypically defined as a «social structure where … a family’s values are held in higher esteem than the values of the individual members of the family». Favoritism granted to relatives regardless of merit is called nepotism.

The Russian-American rationalist and individualist philosopher, novelist and playwright Ayn Rand compared partiality towards consanguinity with racism, as a small-scale manifestation of the latter.[172] «The worship of the family is merely racism, like a crudely primitive first installment on the worship of the tribe. It places the accident of birth above a man’s values and duty to the tribe above a man’s right to his own life.»[173] Additionally, she spoke in favor of childfree lifestyle, while following it herself.[172]

The family and social justice[edit]

One of the controversies regarding the family is the application of the concept of social justice to the private sphere of family relations, in particular with regard to the rights of women and children. Throughout much of the history, most philosophers who advocated for social justice focused on the public political arena, not on the family structures; with the family often being seen as a separate entity which needed to be protected from outside state intrusion. One notable exception was John Stuart Mill, who, in his work The Subjection of Women, advocated for greater rights for women within marriage and family.[174] Second wave feminists argued that the personal is political, stating that there are strong connections between personal experiences and the larger social and political structures. In the context of the feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s, this was a challenge to the nuclear family and family values, as they were understood then.[175] Feminists focused on domestic violence, arguing that the reluctance—in law or in practice—of the state to intervene and offer protection to women who have been abused within the family, is in violation of women’s human rights, and is the result of an ideology which places family relations outside the conceptual framework of human rights.[176]

Global trends in family composition[edit]

Statistics from an infographic by Olivier Ballou showed that,[177]

In 2013, just over 40% of US babies were born outside marriage. The Census bureau estimated that 27% of all children lived in a fatherless home. Europe has seen a surge in child-free adults. One in five 40-something women are childless in Sweden and in Switzerland, in Italy one in four, in Berlin one in three. So-called traditional societies are seeing the same trend. About one-sixth of Japanese women in their forties have never married and about 30% of all women that age are childless.

However, Swedish statisticians reported in 2013 that, in contrast to many countries, since the 2000s, fewer children have experienced their parents’ separation, childlessness had decreased in Sweden and marriages had increased. It had also become more common for couples to have a third child suggesting that the nuclear family was no longer in decline in Sweden.[178]: 10 

See also[edit]

  • Childlessness
  • Familialism
  • Family economics
  • Household
  • Nepotism
  • Parent
  • Stepfamily
  • Voluntary childlessness

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Although married women in France obtained the right to work without their husbands’ permission in 1965,[155] and the paternal authority of a man over his family was ended in 1970 (before that parental responsibilities belonged solely to the father who made all legal decisions concerning the children), it was only in 1985 that a legal reform abolished the stipulation that the husband had the sole power to administer the children’s property.[156]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Donald Collins; Catheleen Jordan; Heather Coleman (2010). An Introduction to Family Social Work. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning. pp. 28–29. ISBN 978-0-495-80872-5. Archived from the original on 2020-07-31. Retrieved 2019-08-13.
  2. ^ Alhussain, Khalid, Shah, Drishti, Thornton, James, Kelly, Kimberly. Familial Opioid Misuse and Family Cohesion: Impact on Family Communication and Well-being. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment 2019;18(4):194–204. doi:10.1097/ADT.0000000000000165.
  3. ^ Lander L, Howsare J, Byrne M. The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice. Soc Work Public Health. 2013;28:194–205.
  4. ^ Jás Elsner (2007). «The Changing Nature of Roman Art and the Art Historical Problem of Style,» in Eva R. Hoffman (ed), Late Antique and Medieval Art of the Medieval World, 11–18. Oxford, Malden & Carlton: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-2071-5, p. 17, Figure 1.3 on p. 18.
  5. ^ a b Schneider, David 1984 A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 182
  6. ^ Deleuze-Guattari (1972). Part 2, ch. 3, p. 80
  7. ^ Russon, John, (2003) Human Experience: Philosophy, Neurosis, and the Elements of Everyday Life, Albany: State University of New York Press. pp. 61–68.
  8. ^ George Peter Murdoch Social Structure p. 13
  9. ^ Wolf, Eric. 1982 Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley: University of California Press. 92
  10. ^ Harner, Michael 1975 «Scarcity, the Factors of Production, and Social Evolution,» in Population, Ecology, and Social Evolution, Steven Polgar, ed. Mouton Publishers: the Hague.
  11. ^ Rivière, Peter 1987 «Of Women, Men, and Manioc», Etnologiska Studier (38).
  12. ^ «We have seen that people can refer to their relatives as ‘the family.’ ‘All the family turned up for the funeral… But of course, my brother didn’t bring his family along— they’re much too young.’ Here the reference is to the offspring (as distinct from ‘all’ the family). The neighbors were very good, too. ‘The Jones came, and their two children. It was nice, the whole family turning up like that.’ Here the usage is more restricted than ‘relatives’ or ‘his relatives,’ but includes just both parents and offspring. ‘Of course, the children will be leaving home soon. It’s always sad to see the family break up like that.’ Here the reference is not only to parents and children but to their co-residence, that is, to the household.»The Family and Industrial Society», 1983, George Allen Unwin, London, p. 30
  13. ^ Olivia Harris. Kate Young; Carol Wolkowitz; Roslyn McCullagh (eds.). Of Marriage and the Market: Women’s Subordination Internationally and its Lessons. London: Routeledge. p. 138.
  14. ^ a b «The World Factbook – Central Intelligence Agency». Cia.gov. Archived from the original on 28 October 2009. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  15. ^ Axinn, William G.; Clarkberg, Marin E.; Thornton, Arland (1994). «Family Influences on Family Size Preferences». Demography. 31 (1): 65–79. doi:10.2307/2061908. ISSN 0070-3370. JSTOR 2061908. PMID 8005343. S2CID 7787872.
  16. ^ Murphy, Michael (2013). «Cross-National Patterns of Intergenerational Continuities in Childbearing in Developed Countries». Biodemography and Social Biology. 59 (2): 101–126. doi:10.1080/19485565.2013.833779. ISSN 1948-5565. PMC 4160295. PMID 24215254.
  17. ^ Little, William (2014-11-06). «Chapter 1. An Introduction to Sociology». Archived from the original on 2022-07-15. Retrieved 2022-07-15.
  18. ^ «The Collapse of Marriage by Don Browning – The Christian Century». Religion-online.org. February 7, 2006. pp. 24–28. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-10.
  19. ^ Levitan, Sara (2010). «Working wives and mothers: what happens to family life?» (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on August 19, 2013. Retrieved January 8, 2014.
  20. ^ a b c «The Return of the Multi-Generational Family Household». Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project. 2010-03-18. Archived from the original on 2021-02-28. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
  21. ^ «Record 64 million Americans live in multigenerational households». Pew Research Center. 2018-04-05. Archived from the original on 2021-02-21. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
  22. ^ «The Daily — Families, households and marital status: Key results from the 2016 Census». Statistics Canada. 2017-08-02. Archived from the original on 2021-04-15. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
  23. ^ Smith, Court. «Definitions of Anthropological Terms». Oregonstate.edu. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  24. ^ Compare: Scott, John, ed. (2014). A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford paperback reference (4 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-0-19-968358-1. Archived from the original on 2020-08-01. Retrieved 2018-06-30. The conjugal family refers to a family system of spouses and their dependent children. […] The term nuclear family is used to refer to a unit consisting of spouses and their dependent children. […]
  25. ^ Compare: Lee, Gary R. (1999). «4: Comparative Perspectives». In Sussman, Marvin B.; Steinmetz, Suzanne K.; Peterson, Gary W. (eds.). Handbook of Marriage and the Family (2 ed.). New York: Springer Science & Business Media (published 2013). p. 96. ISBN 978-1-4757-5367-7. Archived from the original on 2020-08-01. Retrieved 2018-06-30. […] the nuclear family (consisting of parents and dependent children) […] the conjugal family (defined as nuclear in structure) […].
  26. ^ «Fewer than half of U.S. kids today live in a ‘traditional’ family». Pewresearch.org. 22 December 2014. Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  27. ^ Staff writers (March 2014). «The Kids will be alright, even without the Nuclear Family». Pacific Standard magazine. Archived from the original on 30 July 2022. Retrieved 22 April 2017.
  28. ^ Bryant, L.E. (March 2016). «Nuclear Families». The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies. pp. 1–3. doi:10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs490. ISBN 978-0-470-65845-1.
  29. ^ Dowd, Nancy E (1997). In Defence of Single Parent Families. New York and London: New York University Press. ISBN 0-8147-1869-8. Retrieved 19 November 2022.
  30. ^ Sanford L. Braver and Michael E. Lamb, Shared Parenting After Parental Separation: The Views of 12 Experts, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, April 2018: «The empirical evidence currently available supports the view that children of divorce, on average, benefit substantially from SP [shared parenting] arrangements in which they live with each parent at least 35% of the time. Findings from well over 50 individual studies indicate that children whose parents have SP fare better than those with sole physical custody […].»
  31. ^ Baude, Amandine; Pearson, Jessica; Drapeau, Sylvie (27 June 2016). «Child Adjustment in Joint Physical Custody Versus Sole Custody: A Meta-Analytic Review». Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 57 (5): 338–360. doi:10.1080/10502556.2016.1185203. S2CID 147782279.
  32. ^ American Psychological Association, Single parenting and today’s family Archived 2019-01-30 at the Wayback Machine
  33. ^ Kathryn M. Feltey, Single-Parent Families Archived 2019-01-31 at the Wayback Machine, International Encyclopedia of Marriage and Family
  34. ^ a b Randolph, Richard R. (1964). «The «Matrifocal Family» as a Comparative Category». American Anthropologist. 66 (3): 628–631. doi:10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00130. ISSN 0002-7294. JSTOR 668860.
  35. ^
    Godelier, Maurice, trans. Nora Scott, The Metamorphoses of Kinship (London: Verso, 2011 (ISBN 978-1-84467-746-7)), p. 568 (Glossary, entry matrifocal) (trans. from Métamorphoses de la parenté (Librarie Arthème Fayard (apparently), 2004)) (author prof. anthropology, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris).
  36. ^ Little, William (2014-11-06). «Chapter 4. Society and Social Interaction». Archived from the original on 2022-05-21. Retrieved 2022-07-18.
  37. ^ a b Pritchard, Colin Pritchard (2006). Mental Health Social Work: Evidence-Based Practice. Routledge. p. 111. ISBN 9781134365449. in cultures with stronger ‘extended family traditions’, such as Asian and Catholic countries
  38. ^ «ALGBTICAL LGBT Glossary of Terminology». ALGBTICAL Association for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Issues in Counseling of Alabama. 2005–2006. Archived from the original on May 6, 2016. Retrieved May 4, 2016.
  39. ^ Dewaele, Alexis; Cox, Nele; Van den Berghe, Wim; Vincke, John (February 2011). «Families of Choice? Exploring the Supportive Networks of Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals1: FAMILIES OF CHOICE». Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 41 (2): 312–331. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00715.x. Archived from the original on 2022-05-04. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
  40. ^ a b c Stitt, Alex (2020). ACT For Gender Identity: The Comprehensive Guide. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. pp. 372–376. ISBN 978-1785927997. OCLC 1089850112.
  41. ^ Blended and Blessed Archived 2017-11-04 at the Wayback Machine – Encouraging Step-Families, blendedandblessed.com
  42. ^ «Department of Social and Developmental Psychology: PPSIS Faculty, Academic Profile». Sdp.cam.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2011-11-25. Retrieved 2011-03-26.
  43. ^ Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-10309 Archived 2010-12-25 at the Wayback Machine paragraph 17
  44. ^ «Parenting Myths And Facts». NPR.org. Archived from the original on 2019-04-13. Retrieved 2018-05-14.
  45. ^ see History of the family § Evolution of household
  46. ^ «The Evolution of American Family Structure». Concordia University, St. Paul Online. 2015-06-23. Archived from the original on 2021-06-10. Retrieved 2021-06-10.
  47. ^ McCornack, Steven (2010). Reflect & Relate an introduction to interpersonal communication. Boston/NY: Bedford/St. Martin’s. pp. 369–370.
  48. ^ Portrie, Torey; Hill, Nicole R. (October 2005). «Blended Families: A Critical Review of the Current Research». The Family Journal. 13 (4): 445–451. doi:10.1177/1066480705279014. ISSN 1066-4807. S2CID 32353012. Archived from the original on 2022-05-04. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
  49. ^ Braithwaite, Dawn; Olson, Loreen; Golish, Tamara; Soukup, Charles; Turman, Paul (2001-01-01). ««Becoming a family»: developmental processes represented in blended family discourse». Journal of Applied Communication Research. 29 (3): 221–247. doi:10.1080/00909880128112. ISSN 0090-9882. S2CID 14220043.
  50. ^ Braithwaite, Dawn O.; Baxter, Leslie A.; Harper, Anneliese M. (1998-06-01). «The role of rituals in the management of the dialectical tension of «old» and «new» in blended families». Communication Studies. 49 (2): 101–120. doi:10.1080/10510979809368523. ISSN 1051-0974. Archived from the original on 2022-07-30. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
  51. ^ Cf. «Monogamy» in Britannica World Language Dictionary, R.C. Preble (ed.), Oxford-London 1962, p. 1275:1. The practice or principle of marrying only once. opp. to digamy now rare 2. The condition, rule or custom of being married to only one person at a time (opp. to polygamy or bigamy) 1708. 3. Zool. The habit of living in pairs, or having only one mate; The same text repeats The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, W. Little, H.W. Fowler, J. Coulson (ed.), C.T. Onions (rev. & ed.,) Oxford 1969, 3rd edition, vol. 1, p. 1275; OED Online. March 2010. Oxford University Press. 23 Jun. 2010 Cf. Monogamy Archived 2015-06-23 at the Wayback Machine in Merriam-Webster Dictionary
  52. ^ «bigamy». Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
  53. ^ «Opening Up: Challenging Myths about Consensual Non-Monogamy – Science of Relationships». Scienceofrelationships.com. 2012-08-17. Archived from the original on 2017-04-04. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  54. ^ a b Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard (2008). Polygamy: a cross-cultural analysis. Berg. p. 3. ISBN 978-1-84520-220-0. Archived from the original on 2020-08-01. Retrieved 2015-11-19.
  55. ^ McCullough, Derek; Hall, David S. (February 27, 2003). «Polyamory – What it is and what it isn’t». Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 6. Archived from the original on December 10, 2020. Retrieved March 14, 2015.
  56. ^ Zeitzen, Miriam K. (2008). Polygamy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Oxford: Berg. p. 9.
  57. ^ «Archived copy». study.com. Archived from the original on 2022-07-30. Retrieved 2022-07-18.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  58. ^ a b Starkweather, Katherine E.; Hames, Raymond (June 2012). «A survey of non-classical polyandry». Human Nature. 23 (2): 149–172. doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9144-x. PMID 22688804. S2CID 2008559. Archived from the original on 2019-12-04. Retrieved 2018-11-14.
  59. ^ w3we.com. «Family — w3we». hy.w3we.com (in Armenian). Archived from the original on 2022-07-18. Retrieved 2022-07-18.
  60. ^ By replacement in the definition of the notion of «generation» by meiosis». Since identical twins are not separated by meiosis, there are no «generations» between them, hence n=0 and r=1. See genetic-genealogy.co.uk Archived 2021-02-24 at the Wayback Machine.
  61. ^ «Kin Selection». Benjamin/Cummings. Archived from the original on 2015-05-17. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
  62. ^ Tooker, Elisabeth. «Another View of Morgan on Kinship.» Archived 2018-09-22 at the Wayback Machine Current Anthropology 20, no. 1 (March 1979): 131–134.
  63. ^ «Systematic Kinship Terminologies». www.umanitoba.ca. Archived from the original on 2019-12-24. Retrieved 2022-07-18.
  64. ^ A Dictionary of Genetics. Oxford University Press. 2013. 8.
  65. ^ «Definition of Cousin». Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 2021-02-01. Retrieved 2020-04-20.
  66. ^ «Co-Sister». Cambridge Dictionary. Cambridge Dictionary. Archived from the original on 13 January 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  67. ^ «Co-Brother». Cambridge Dictionary. Cambridge Dictionary. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  68. ^ Benokraitis, N.V. Marriages and Families. 7th Edition, Pearson Education, Inc., 2011
  69. ^ Shepard, Jon; Greene, Robert W. (2003). Sociology and You. Ohio: Glencoe McGraw-Hill. p. A-22. ISBN 978-0-07-828576-9. Archived from the original on 2010-03-08.
  70. ^ Stone, Linda (2006). Kinship and Gender: An Introduction. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. pp. 168–169. ISBN 978-0-8133-4302-0.
  71. ^ Ezzell, Carol (June 2001). «The Himba and the Dam». Scientific American. 284 (6): 80–90. Bibcode:2001SciAm.284f..80E. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0601-80. PMID 11396346. Archived from the original on 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2015-07-12.
  72. ^ «Sociology/Founding the discipline». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 2009-12-23. Retrieved 2009-07-26.
  73. ^ Morgan 1877
  74. ^ «Cultural Anthropology». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 2009-08-15. Retrieved 2009-07-22.
  75. ^ «The Marxists Internet Archive». Archived from the original on 2006-04-25. Retrieved 2009-07-17.
  76. ^ Williams, Brian; Sawyer, Stacey C.; Wahlstrom, Carl M. (2005). Marriages, Families & Intimate Relationships. Boston, MA: Pearson. 0-205-36674-0.
  77. ^ Zinn, Maxine Baca; Eitzen, D. Stanley (2002). Diversity in families (6 ed.). Allyn and Bacon. p. 557. ISBN 978-0-205-33522-0. Archived from the original on 2013-03-29. Retrieved 2012-01-06. This ‘family as haven’ image of a refuge from an impersonal world characterizes the family as a place of intimacy, love, and trust in which individuals may escape the competition of dehumanizing forces in modern society. Christopher Lasch (1977:8) has named this image a ‘haven in a heartless world’ and described it as a glorification of private life made necessary by the deprivations experienced in the public world.
  78. ^ a b Zinn and Eitzen (1987) Diversity in American families Archived 2016-05-29 at the Wayback Machine, p. 3
  79. ^ a b Zinn and Eitzen (1987) Diversity in American families Archived 2016-05-18 at the Wayback Machine, p. 8
  80. ^ «Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States». CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. May 13, 2009. Archived from the original on September 6, 2011. Retrieved September 24, 2011.
  81. ^ Tavernise, Sabrina (2011). «Married Couples Are No Longer a Majority, Census Finds». The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 25, 2014. Retrieved January 8, 2014.
  82. ^ «The Family Revolution». Greater Good. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
  83. ^ Coontz, Stephanie. 2005. Marriage, A History: How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Viking/Penguin Books.
  84. ^ Male and Female, New York, 1949. pp. 193–194
  85. ^ Scottish Government, Scottish Government, Edinburgh (27 April 2006). «Family Matters – Couples – Cohabitation». Scotland.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 24 October 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  86. ^ «Full list». Coe.int. Archived from the original on 2 October 2000. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  87. ^ «Full list». Coe.int. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  88. ^ «1 in 5 US moms have kids with multiple dads, study says». Nbcnews.com. 1 April 2011. Archived from the original on 22 June 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  89. ^ «American Children’s Family Structure: Single-Parent Families». Bowling Green State University. Archived from the original on 2021-06-20. Retrieved 2022-05-04.
  90. ^ «Definitions of Domestic Violence – Child Welfare Information Gateway». Childwelfare.gov. Archived from the original on 15 December 2014. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  91. ^ «Full list». Coe.int. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  92. ^ «A/RES/48/104. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women». United Nations. 20 December 1993. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  93. ^ Wallace, p. 2
  94. ^ «Child maltreatment». World Health Organization. Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  95. ^ Roffee, James A. (2015). «When Yes Actually Means Yes». Roffee, James (2015). When Yes Actually Means Yes in Rape Justice. 72–91. doi:10.1057/9781137476159.0009. ISBN 978-1-137-47615-9.
  96. ^ Roffee, J. A. (2014). «No Consensus on Incest? Criminalisation and Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights» (PDF). Human Rights Law Review. 14 (3): 541–572. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngu023. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-10-30. Retrieved 2018-10-30.
  97. ^ «Elder abuse». World Health Organization. Archived from the original on October 26, 2007. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  98. ^ «Child abuse – definition of child abuse by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia». Thefreedictionary.com. Archived from the original on 9 June 2019. Retrieved 15 September 2010.
  99. ^ Leeb, R.T.; Paulozzi, L.J.; Melanson, C.; Simon, T.R.; Arias, I. (1 January 2008). «Child Maltreatment Surveillance: Uniform Definitions for Public Health and Recommended Data Elements». Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Archived from the original on 16 October 2008. Retrieved 20 October 2008.
  100. ^ «Parenting and Family Support – Family Lives (Parentline Plus)». Parentlineplus.org.uk. Archived from the original on 21 December 2010. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  101. ^ «WHEN FAMILY LIFE HURTS: Family experience of aggression in children – Parentline plus 31 October 2010» (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 19, 2012.
  102. ^ elderabus.org.uk Archived 2019-08-20 at the Wayback Machine, accessed October 12, 2007.
  103. ^ a b «Q & A: Child Marriage and Violations of Girls’ Rights». Hrw.org. 14 June 2013. Archived from the original on 20 June 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  104. ^ «WHO – Child marriages: 39 000 every day». Who.int. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  105. ^ «I have a right to – BBC World Service». Bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 6 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  106. ^ Finsgate, Switchboard: +44300 777 9777 Plan International UK; London, 5-7 Cranwood Street; Uk, Ec1v 9lh. «Ending child marriage». Plan International UK. Archived from the original on March 12, 2014.
  107. ^ «Ethics – Forced Marriages: Introduction». Bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 3 September 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  108. ^ «Ethics – Slavery: Modern slavery». Bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 6 January 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  109. ^ Gulnara Shahinian. «Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences» (PDF). Ohchr.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  110. ^ «Child marriage». Unicef.org. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  111. ^ a b c «I have a right to». Bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 6 April 2017. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
  112. ^ «Factsheet: Child Marriage» (PDF). GirlUp. United Nations Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2014-07-20.
  113. ^ «Child marriages: 39 000 every day». Who.int. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
  114. ^ Malina, Bruce J. (15 February 2001). The New Testament world: insights from cultural anthropology. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-664-22295-6. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
  115. ^ a b Mosquera, Patricia M.R.; Manstead, Antony S.R.; Fischer, Agneta H. (January 2002). «Honor in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe». Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 33 (1): 16–36. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1006.591. doi:10.1177/0022022102033001002. S2CID 55174724. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
  116. ^ Berns, Roberta (2007). Child, family, school, community: socialization and support. Thompson Learning. p. 139. ISBN 978-0-495-00758-6. Archived from the original on 2021-04-15. Retrieved 2020-10-31.
  117. ^ McGoldrick, Monica; Giordano, Joseph; Garcia-Preto, Nydia (18 August 2005). Ethnicity and family therapy. Guilford Press. p. 445. ISBN 978-1-59385-020-3. Archived from the original on 16 March 2015. Retrieved 24 October 2011.
  118. ^ «Ethics: Honour Crimes». BBC. 1 January 1970. Archived from the original on 19 June 2014. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
  119. ^ «Honor killing: Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary». Merriam-webster.com. 31 August 2012. Archived from the original on 22 December 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
  120. ^ «Honor killing definition». Dictionary.reference.com. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
  121. ^ «Shocking gay honor killing inspires movie». Edition.cnn.com. Archived from the original on 29 September 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2013.
  122. ^ «Iraqi immigrant convicted in Arizona ‘honor killing’ awaits sentence». Edition.cnn.com. 23 February 2011. Archived from the original on 29 September 2013. Retrieved 16 August 2013.
  123. ^ «Definition of DOWRY». Merriam-webster.com. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  124. ^ Goody, Jack (1976). Production and Reproduction: A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 8.
  125. ^ «Gender, equity, human rights». Who.int. Archived from the original on August 29, 2003. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  126. ^ «State of World Population 2005». UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund. Archived from the original on 1 March 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  127. ^ «WHO – Gender and human rights». Who.int. Archived from the original on 23 December 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  128. ^ «Get Involved». Amnesty.org. Archived from the original on 17 January 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  129. ^ «Supporting the Constellation of Reproductive Rights». UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund. Archived from the original on 30 July 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  130. ^ «Family planning». Who.int. Archived from the original on 18 March 2016. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  131. ^ «Family planning». UNFPA – United Nations Population Fund. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  132. ^ «Forced/Coerced Sterilization». Stopvaw.org. Archived from the original on 13 December 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  133. ^ «Czech regret over sterilisation». BBC News. 2009-11-24. Archived from the original on 2018-10-13. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  134. ^ Cabitza, Mattia (6 December 2011). «Peru women fight for justice over forced sterilisation». BBC News. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  135. ^ Collier & Sheldon, 2006, pp. 1–26.
  136. ^ «Protecting children’s rights». Unicef.org. Archived from the original on 6 March 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  137. ^ «Children’s Rights». Hrw.org. Archived from the original on 6 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  138. ^ «Children and human rights». Amnesty International. Archived from the original on 19 February 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  139. ^ «The Policy on Gender Equality in Italy» (PDF). Europarl.europa.eu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  140. ^ Rashida Manjoo. «Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences» (PDF). Ohchr.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  141. ^ Solsten, Eric; Meditz, Sandra W., eds. (1988). «Social Values and Attitudes». Spain: A Country Study. Washington: Government Printing Office for the Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 2011-05-20. Retrieved 2016-02-26.
  142. ^ Contemporary Western European Feminism, by Gisela Kaplan, p. 133
  143. ^ Reconciliation Policy in Germany 1998–2008, Construing the ‘Problem’ of the Incompatibility of Paid Employment and Care Work, by Cornelius Grebe; p. 92: «However, the 1977 reform of marriage and family law by Social Democrats and Liberals formally gave women the right to take up employment without their spouses’ permission. This marked the legal end of the ‘housewife marriage’ and a transition to the ideal of ‘marriage in partnership’.»[1] Archived 2017-04-16 at the Wayback Machine
  144. ^ Further reforms to parental rights law in 1979 gave equal legal rights to the mother and the father. Comparative Law: Historical Development of the Civil Law Tradition in Europe, Latin America, and East Asia, by John Henry Merryman, David Scott Clark, John Owen Haley, p. 542
  145. ^ Women in Portugal, by Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General Information, p. 32
  146. ^ «On Equality of Spouses in Civil Law» (PDF). Wcd.coe.int. Archived from the original on 21 January 2016. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  147. ^ «Switzerland profile». Bbc.com. 24 July 2017. Archived from the original on 17 June 2018. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  148. ^ Switzerland, Markus G. Jud, Lucerne. «The Long Way to Women’s Right to Vote in Switzerland: a Chronology». History-switzerland.geschichte-schweiz.ch. Archived from the original on 21 November 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  149. ^ Women’s movements of the world: an international directory and reference guide, edited by Sally Shreir, p. 254
  150. ^ «AROUND THE WORLD; Greece Approves Family Law Changes». The New York Times. 23 October 1983. Archived from the original on 16 June 2012. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  151. ^ Demos, Vasilikie. (2007) «The Intersection of Gender, Class and Nationality and the Agency of Kytherian Greek Women.» Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. August 11
  152. ^ a b International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (2013). «Women, Business and the Law 2014: Removing Restrictions to Enhance Gender Equality» (PDF). London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-24. Retrieved 2014-08-25.
  153. ^ «Dutch gender and LGBT-equality policy : 2013 – 2016» (PDF). Rm.coe.int. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  154. ^ «2015 Review Report of the Netherlands Government in the context of the twentieth anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women and the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action» (PDF). Unece.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 October 2015. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  155. ^ «Virtual Special Issue: Modern & Contemporary France: Women in France» (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
  156. ^ Ferrand, Frédérique. «National Report: France» (PDF). Commission on European Family Law. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-08-11. Retrieved 2016-02-26.
  157. ^ Country Comparison: Maternal Mortality Rate Archived 2015-04-18 at the Wayback Machine in The CIA World Factbook.
  158. ^ «What is Family Medicine?». Uchicago.edu – Department of Family Medicine. Archived from the original on 7 May 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  159. ^ «The rising importance of family medicine». Who.int. Archived from the original on March 7, 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  160. ^ Infant Mortality Rates in 2012 Archived July 14, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, UNICEF, 2013.
  161. ^ a b «Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)». Who.int. Archived from the original on May 7, 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  162. ^ «Maternal mortality». Who.int. Archived from the original on 30 September 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  163. ^ «Infant mortality». Who.int. Archived from the original on March 24, 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  164. ^ «Children: reducing mortality». Who.int. Archived from the original on 18 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  165. ^ «The Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran» (PDF). 11 March 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 March 2017. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  166. ^ N, Panasenko (2013). «Czech and Slovak Family Patterns and Family Values in Historical, Social and Cultural Context». Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 44 (1): 79–98. doi:10.3138/jcfs.44.1.79.
  167. ^ Bjørnholt, M. (2014). «Changing men, changing times; fathers and sons from an experimental gender equality study» (PDF). The Sociological Review. 62 (2): 295–315. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12156. S2CID 143048732. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-10-21. Retrieved 2014-09-11.
  168. ^ «Art. 8 ECHR Right to private life – Introduction». ECHR online. Archived from the original on 2014-10-21. Retrieved 2014-10-20.
  169. ^ «Abolition of the Family for The Guardians and the Use of War (457b-471c)» (PDF). Homepages.gac.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 May 2018. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
  170. ^ «SparkNotes: The Republic: Book V». Sparknotes.com. Archived from the original on 26 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  171. ^ «The Republic Book 5 Summary & Analysis». Litcharts.com. LitCharts – The creators of SparkNotes. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  172. ^ a b Heller, Anne C. (2009). Ayn Rand and the World She Made. New York: Doubleday. pp. 320–321. ISBN 978-0-385-51399-9. OCLC 2290274371. Said in one of the lectures Archived 2015-07-03 at the Wayback Machine Ayn Rand delivered.
  173. ^ Said in one of the public lectures Archived 2015-07-03 at the Wayback Machine Ayn Rand delivered
  174. ^ Satz, Debra (1 January 2017). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 18 March 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2017 – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  175. ^ Angela Harutyunyan, Kathrin Hörschelmann, Malcolm Miles (2009) Public Spheres After Socialism pp. 50–51 Archived 2022-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
  176. ^ Patel, Vibhuti. «Domestic Violence: A Violation of Human Rights of Women by Dr. Vibhuti Patel, Director, P.G.S.R.» Academia.edu. Archived from the original on 17 April 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
  177. ^ Nicholas Eberstadt (February 23, 2015), The global flight from the family, Washington: American Enterprise Institute, archived from the original on September 8, 2015, retrieved February 26, 2017, keywords Economic Development, Foreign and Defense Policy, International Economics, Infographic by Olivier Ballou global trends in family composition
  178. ^

Sources[edit]

  • Race, Class, & Gender: An Anthology, 9th edition. Editors: Margaret L. Anderson and Patricia Hill Collins. Cengage Learning.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Monica McGoldrick; Nydia A. Garcia Preto; Betty A. Carter (12 June 2015). The Expanding Family Life Cycle: Individual, Family, and Social Perspectives. Pearson Education. ISBN 978-0-205-96806-0. Archived from the original on 17 February 2017. Retrieved 15 February 2017.
  • Daly, Mary (2011). «What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective». Social Politics. 18 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1093/sp/jxr002. PMID 21692242. S2CID 21306624.
  • Daly, Mary; Lewis, Jane (2000). «The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states». British Journal of Sociology. 51 (2): 281–98. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x. PMID 10905001. Archived from the original on 2019-06-29. Retrieved 2019-06-25.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Ferragina, Emanuele; Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin (2015). «Determinants of a Silent (R)evolution:Understanding the Expansion of Family Policy in Rich OECD Countries». Social Politics. 22 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1093/sp/jxu027.
  • Forbes, Scott, A Natural History of Families, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), ISBN 0-691-09482-9
  • Foucault, Michel (1978). The History of Sexuality: Volume I: An Introduction. (New York: Vintage Books). ISBN 978-0-679-72469-8
  • Gilroy, Paul «Identity Belonging and the Critique of Pure Sameness» in Gilroy, Paul (2000) Against Race: Imagining Political Culture Beyond the Color Line, (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press), Ch. I.3, pp. 97–133
  • Goody, Jack The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe Archived 2016-05-19 at the Wayback Machine (Cambridge University Press, 1980); translated into Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese.
  • Mock, Douglas W., More Than Kin and Less Than Kind, (Belknap Press, 2004), ISBN 0-674-01285-2
  • Schneider, David M., American Kinship: a cultural approach (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).
  • Tabak, I.; Mazur, J.; Granado, M.C.; Örkenyi, Á.; Zaborskis, A.; Aasvee, K.; Moreno, C. (2012). «Examining trends in parent-child communication in Europe over 12 years». The Journal of Early Adolescence. 32 (1): 26–54. doi:10.1177/0272431611419509. S2CID 206496782.
  • Chevallier, Denis (1985). «Famille et parenté: une bibliographie». Terrain (in French) (4): 77–82. doi:10.4000/terrain.2874. Archived from the original on July 24, 2008. Retrieved January 8, 2014.

External links[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Family.

Look up family in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Wikiquote has quotations related to Family.

  • «Family» . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 10 (11th ed.). 1911.

True meaning of family

Family. It’s not just any other word lost in the pages of a vast dictionary. ‘Family’ is an emotion. Just the mere mention of this word can invoke the most innate feelings of love and belonging in you. Love and belonging is a true family definition. Everyone, even the most solitary soul needs someone they can call a family because family is the one humane aspect that makes a house a home.  And that’s why we must know the true meaning of family.

true meaning of family

A family doesn’t necessarily mean your parents, your siblings or your immediate blood relatives. Family can mean your best friends, your classmates, your teachers, your pet, or even that one person you always wave to at your local coffee shop.

In fact, a family can mean anyone who gives you that comforting feeling of familiarity. Family is the group of people who you know accepts you for you. You feel comfortable, safe, special, that you matter and that your voice matters. Family is that which can make you happy as soon as you see them. They are the ones who stand by you through thick and thin. They are your entire support system. Moreover, keep you going forward in life.

Family Definition – How Do You Define Your Family?

what is family

To be a part of a family is a beautiful phenomenon. It gives us a sense of belonging and love we all crave. But your family isn’t always limited to just your parents, grandparents or siblings. Your family can also be your closest friends, your teachers or your mentors -your chosen family. The true definition of family lies not in blood relations, but it is measured in the amount of love and respect people hold for each other.

The definition of a true family is just this. A group of people who have each other’s back and are willing to go to the ends of the earth to bring a smile to the others’ face. Call it a true family or a real family—the true family definition is the sense of loyalty, selflessness, love, and genuine care and concern for others.

Strengthen Your Ties

It is difficult to find people who want the best for you without any ulterior motives. However, once you do, make sure you fight for them to stay no matter what. There will be hurdles along the way, and huge fights where your relationship may seem too fragile to hold on to. But remember this, overcoming these hurdles together will only strengthen your ties. After all, at the end of the day, the true meaning and definition of family lies in how much you care for one another.

Sometimes your chosen family, vis-a-vis your friends, co-workers, mentors, or teachers may seem more helpful in rising above yourself but never forget your family too. After all, they have known you your entire life and have loved and cared for you since the very beginning, no matter what. 

So go out there into the real world and find your chosen family. Those who will stand by you no matter what, and will always support you no matter what. But make sure you never forget where you came from because that is where you will always truly belong.

The Importance Of A Family

true meaning of family

When we talk about the basic necessities required to sustain life, we focus mainly on food, clothing, and shelter. However, we forget to talk about human interaction. Believe it or not, all human beings require some sort of human association. Without it, we cannot survive. We slip into extreme depression or resort to suicide as a cure to the loneliness we feel due to the lack of this human feeling. Therefore, we require exposure to our own species. Man cannot survive in a solitary unit.

Family is your primary exposure to the same species as you. It is the most basic level of human recognition. A child begins to develop a sense of self-concept by comparing himself to his family. Therefore, a family is essential for the very building of your personality. Family teaches you your first lessons in everything, be it responsibility, forgiveness, letting go of petty fights or caring about others. One cannot stress the importance of having a family anymore. And this is the true meaning of family.

Family Bond Matters

Man is a social animal. Ever since the beginning of time, man has required an association with emotional make-up designed similarly to their own. Basically, we all have an innate need to connect with our own species. Family is one of the major factors that fulfill this necessity.

The need for love and validation is literally a human necessity. Family is that one body that will willingly fulfil those needs. A family with an unbreakable bond can be challenged but never severed. No matter how bad the times are, your true family will be within a mere arm’s reach. They’ll stand ready to help you fight your battles and guide you on the long path of life. After all, a family is what helps a person make their life worth living, and we should value the true meaning of family. For many people, the best approach to life when it comes to the importance of family is a family approach or being family-oriented. So what is family oriented meaning? 

Family Oriented Meaning

family oriented meaning

A family-oriented person thinks profoundly about each family member and cares for them; besides ensuring that his family holds importance in his life, they make them feel seen and heard and accept them for who they are. In other words, family-oriented means putting your family first. In a family-oriented system, you value your family’s feelings, decisions, and, most importantly, thoughts. Always appreciate your bond with them and put them first on your priority list. Moreover, a family-oriented approach is important for personal well-being. It helps to grow professionally, spiritually, physically, and emotionally. So when you make a decision, you ensure that you made your decision while considering your parents’ and families’ feelings. A family-oriented system teaches respect and cares toward family members; it provides support in difficult times. Again, it is a positive trait that enhances personal beliefs and morals.

What Does It Mean To Be “Family-Oriented” In Today’s World?

family oriented in today world

The traditional concept of family-oriented work has evolved as both men and women work and devote time to their families. The family-oriented concept was different a few decades ago than it is now. Women at the time had strong family ties and preferred not to work, stay at home, looking after all household chores; their primary objective was to take care of their family. In contrast, family-oriented men worked to support their families. However, with time, the family-oriented concept has changed; now, both men and women work to support their families, sharing the load equally. Today’s men have surpassed the socially perceived meaning of family-oriented; they work, look after their kids when needed, and treat their partners equally. Women are balancing both home and work, maintaining their work-life balance, and proving that their professional life will not affect their values towards the family. 

Are You Family-Oriented? What Does It Mean To Be Family-Oriented To You?

family oriented to you

The family-oriented concept may vary depending on a person’s values, ideas, and way of thinking. A family-oriented person places their family and close relationships first and foremost. They strongly rely on the family to make decisions, and they prioritize their family’s needs over their own. Furthermore, these people emphasize family values and morals more than anything else. In my opinion, it’s good to be family-oriented. Prioritizing your family first is nothing to be ashamed of, so always prioritize your family. For this reason, always consider ways to become more family-oriented. If your family has grown estranged from you, express your love and appreciation to them before it’s too late.

How To Build A Strong Relationship Within Your Family

family meaning

Every relationship blossoms on the basis of trust. If your child begins to trust you fully and completely at an early stage, the odds are, they’ll still be that connected to you in their teenage stage.

Build Trust

Getting someone as pure as a little child to trust you is easy. What makes it hard is to maintain that trust as they grow up. That means their secrets should remain secrets, no matter how silly they may seem. That means you should be able to make time to hear them out, no matter how bad the work is. This also means being able to trust your child to tell the truth, no matter how fishy things may seem.

Trust is like a spider’s web. You invest all your time and effort trying to build it up, and one small mistake may ruin it all. Trust is fragile and complicated and when you try to build it up again, it won’t ever be the same. Something as delicate and exquisite as trust must be protected and treasured. Apart from this, there are certain things you should do as parents in order to create smooth compatibility within your family. All you need to do to set the gears going is to facilitate contact among the different members of your family.

Spend Time

Sit together and plan to spend quality time with your family; organize family get-togethers, family dinners, karaoke nights, and family game nights where you all sit and sing together or play a board game and whatnot. This will help the family get to know each other better.

You can also have daily talk sessions where you all leave everything aside and just talk to each other about any random thing for at least 15 minutes. This will help you think of the people in your family as individual people and not just members of a family. For example, kids think of their mothers only as mothers and they often fail to recognize that their mother is a separate entity, who has certain likes, dislikes, opinions, or problems. It helps family members to disengage from their own personal bubbles and step into others’ shoes.

How Does A Family Affect Teenagers?

affect on teenagers - True meaning of family

Most teenagers stop feeling this sense of familiarity with their parents once they start growing up. They lose that confidence and trust that they once had in their parents and begin to search for a family amongst their peers. While this is healthy, “normal”, one might say, it does play a major role in a teenager’s life. Making friends that seem as close as a family is a great thing, but not when you begin to push away people who truly care about you.

All of us experienced that one stage in life, where your own family embarrassed or irritated you. Most of these experiences are direct results of parents attempting to connect with their children. While they mean well, the method they use to make this connection can often result in uncomfortable situations for teenagers.

Parents try to adhere to teenage trends thinking that by doing so, their children will be more receptive to their attention. Parents should try to dress, talk and behave in such a way that give a sense of belonging and understanding to the children. In an attempt to befriend their children, parents lose out on their primary goal: preparing their children for the tough future they have to face.

However, this usually has negative consequences, wherein children start to think of their parents as a source of embarrassment, rather than someone they look up to.

A strong connection can be maintained among parents and their children if there is an undisputed understanding within them. Parents and children can be the best of friends if they trust and understand each other, it should be the parents’ duty to rebuke as well as reform.

Also Read: For every single person in the world, a family is everything!. Celebrate your family love with these family quotes.

An intimate and relatively permanent domestic group connected by blood, marriage or adoption that live together and share social and economic responsibilities is called a family.

It is the smallest and most basic social unit and also the most important primary group found in any society. It is the most immediate group a child is exposed to. In fact, it is the most enduring group, which has a tremendous influence on an individual life from birth until death.

It is a basic social institution of social structure. Its evolution was thought to be at the ancient time, while family and kinship relationships were developed through marriage. It is the most basic of all social groupings. It is the first and the most immediate social environment to which a child is exposed.

It is an outstanding primary group because it is that the child develops its basic attitude. Every one of us grows up in a house and every one of us too will be a member of a family. We join other groups for longer or shorter periods of time for the satisfaction of different interests but family is with us always.

The family, in general, is a small group consisting ordinarily of a father, mother, one or more children, and sometimes near or distant relatives.

a happy family
A Happy Family

Literally, the English word family is made up of ‘famulus’ which means servant. Extending this word, what we understand is that when people act as servants to each other such relationship is defined as family, each of the members in the house has distinct status and roles, under which familial tasks are performed. Reproduction, nourishment, education, and socialization process happened through the family. It is an institution of interconnection between two or more people through which social behavior, customs, beliefs pass from generation to generation.

It is a primary social group, universally recognized to be the basis of all human endeavors and activities. Anthropologists and other social scientists have debated over its origin, functions, and other important aspects of this important social institution. It has been, however, believed that it would be impossible to conceive the progress of man without family organizations.

Definitions:

It has been defined by different social scientists. Some effective definitions are:

  • To Maclver, “Family is a group defined by sexual ralationship, sufficiently precise and enduring to provide for a procreation and upbringing of children.”
  • To M.F. Nimkoff, “Family is a more or less durable association of husband and wife, with or without child, or of a man and woman alone, with children.”

Characteristics or Features of Family

It is a universal group: It is found in one form or other, in all types of societies whether primitive or modern.

Marriage as the basis: A family is based on marriage, which results in a mating relationship between two adults of the opposite sex.

Source of nomenclature: Every house provides an individual with a name, and hence, it is a source of nomenclature.

Trace of ancestry: It is the group through which descent or ancestry can be traced.

The primary agent of socialization: It is the most basic group as it is the primary agent of socialization of an individual.

Various forms: It is generally limited in size such as nuclear, even large, joint, and extended families.

The nucleus of all institutions: It is the most important group in society; it is the nucleus of all institutions, organizations, and groups.

Emotional attachment: It is based on emotions and sentiments. Mating, procreation, love, and affection are the basis of family ties.

Unit of cooperation: It is a unit of emotional and economic cooperation.

Division of labor: Each member of the house has duties and responsibilities.

Social roles: Each family is made up of different social roles, like those of husband, wife, mother, father, children, brothers, or sisters.

Types of Family

On the basis of Structure and Size:

  • Nuclear Family– It is a small group consisting of a husband, a wife, and children, natural or adopted. It is more or less an autonomous unit that is not under the control of adults or elders of the house.
  • Joint Family– It is consists of three or more generation, living together under the same roof, sharing the same kitchen and economic expenses. It is a house consisting of three or more nuclear families living together.

On the basis of Birth:

Family of Orientation: It is in which an individual is born is his family of orientation.

Family of Procreation: It is where an individual sets up after his/her marriage is his/her family of procreation.

On the Basis of Marriage:

Monogamous Family: It consists of one husband and wife including children based on monogamous marriages.

Polygamous Family: It is also of two types as,

  • Polygynous– It is consisting of one husband, and more than one wife, and all the children born to all the wives or adopted by each of them. This type of family is based on polygynous marriage (polygyny).
  • Polyandrous– It consisting of one wife and more than one husband, and the children, either born or adopted with each one of them. This type of family is based on polyandrous marriage (polyandry).

On the basis of Residential Patterns:

  • Patrilocal family– in which the married couple lives with or near the husband’s house.
  • Matrilocal family– in which the married couple lives with or near the wife’s house.
  • Teo-local family– in which the married couple lives apart from the parents of both spouses.

On the basis of Ancestry or Descent:

  • Patrilineal family – It is where ancestry or descent is traced through the male line, or through the father’s side.
  • Matrilineal family– It is where ancestry or descent is traced through the female line, or through the mother’s side house.
  • Bilateral family- tracing kinship through both males and females.

On the basis of nature of Relations:

  • Conjugal Family– It is made up of adults among whom there is a sexual relationship and they may also have dependents with them. It also refers to partners, vibe have a long- term sexual relationship, but are not actually married.
  • Consanguine Family– It is made up of members among whom a blood relation exists, i.e., a family consisting of parent(s) and children, or siblings (brothers and sisters).

On the basis of Patterns of Authority:

On the basis of patterns of authority, there are three types of families patriarchal, matriarchal, and egalitarian family.

  • Patriarchal – It is in which men is the head of the house and authority is vested in him.
  • Matriarchal – It is in which women is the head of the house and authority is vested in her.
  • Egalitarian – It is in which men and women share authority.

Functions:

As a social group and important social institution family performs various functions in human society. Different sociologists have viewed or classified the functions of the family into different forms but still, all of them emphasize the same aspects in a different manner. However, these different functions are described as below:

Essential Functions of Family:

Maclver has divided functions of the family into essential (primary functions) and nonessential (secondary functions) functions. Essential functions are those functions that are basic or fundamental in nature and no other institution can perform these functions as successfully as a family can.

MacIvor includes three functions; stable satisfaction of sex needs, production, and rearing of children, and a provision of the home under essential functions. But it may also perform some other functions as follows;

Stable satisfaction of Sexual needs: It is a well-known fact that sexual desire is the most important and powerful instinct and natural urge of human beings. It is the primary duty of the family to satisfy the sexual desire of its members in a stable and desirable way. Through the mechanism of marriage, it regulates the sexual behavior of its members. Because the satisfaction of sex instinct brings the desire for life long partnership between husband and wife.

Procreation (reproduction) and Rearing of Children: It legitimizes the act of reproduction. It institutionalizes the process of procreation. By performing this function of procreation family contributes to the continuity of families and ultimately the human race. Not only is the production of children but also child-rearing is done by the family. It takes care of the child at the time of need.

Provision of Home: It provides an individual with a home and establishes enduring social relationships. It is only in a home that children are born and brought up under the strict vigilance of all its members. It is the home where all the members live happily with comfort, peace, and protection. A home provides emotional and psychological support to all its members.

Socialization: It is one of the primary agents of socialization The primary socialization of any individual takes place within the family. The immediate house members teach all the basic norms, values, morals, and ideals of society to a child. He learns the culture and acquires character through the process of socialization. His personality develops in the course of his living in a family. It is said that man is not born human but made human. The newborn human baby became a human being after they are socialized.

Non-Essential or Secondary Functions of the Family:

Under non-essential functions, Maclver includes economic, religious, educational, health, and recreational functions. These functions are non-essential in the sense that these are also performed simultaneously by other social institutions in the family. These functions are as follows:

Economic functions: In ancient times house was both a production and consumption unit. It fulfills the economic needs of its members. This function has undergone a transformation, with families moving from being production and consumption units in ancient times to becoming more of consuming units rather than producing one. Nowadays, members of a family no longer produce things themselves; rather, they go out and work for some monetary remuneration or wages.

Educational functions: As a primary educational institution, the family used to teach letters, knowledge, skill, and trade secret to all its members. It looks after the primary education of its members and molds their career and character. Mother act as the first and best teacher of a child. Besides, he learns all sorts of informal education such as discipline, obedience, manners, etc. from home.

Religious functions: All the members believe in a particular religion and observe religious ceremonies, rites, rituals, and practices at home. Children learn different religious values from their parents. It transmits religious beliefs and practices from one generation to another.

Health-related functions: It is a primary social group performs several health-related functions for its members. It looks after the health and vigor of its members. It takes care of the sick, old-aged persons of the family. By providing necessary nutritive food to its Members it takes care of the health of all.

Recreational function: It also has a recreational function. In ancient times, the home was the only center of recreation. Gatherings during festivals, functions, families reunion, marriages, brought entire families together. Nowadays taking family members out on holidays or for movies plays, dinners, or parties, etc. perform the same function.

Cultural functions: It is an important agent of cultural transmission. Culture is transmitted from one generation to another through the house members. It preserves different cultural traits. All the aspects of culture are learned within the family structure.

Social functions: It performs a number of social functions. It teaches about social customs, mores, traditions, norms, etiquette to the new generations. It exercises social control over its members and brings them into conformity with accepted social standards. Senior members of the house directly control the behavior of children and thereby they become good citizens.

Labor division: It is the basis of the division of labor, where all members have their duties and obligations towards each other.


Author:

Sara Rhodes


Date Of Creation:

16 February 2021


Update Date:

12 April 2023


Expanding the Definition of Family | Amanda Bastoni & Anthony David | TEDxKeene

Video: Expanding the Definition of Family | Amanda Bastoni & Anthony David | TEDxKeene

Content

  • What is Family:
  • Social function of the family
  • Types of family
  • Family in grammar
  • Family in biology

What is Family:

The family is designated as group of people who have a degree of kinship and live together as such.

The word family comes from Latin famulus which means ‘servant’ or ‘slave’. Indeed, formerly the expression included the relatives and servants of the master’s house.

According to sociology, the term family refers to the social unit minimum constituted by the father, the mother and the children.

According to him Right, the family is a group of people related by the degree of kinship.

The legal system stipulates the three types of relationships:

  • kinship by consanguinity: people who are descended from the same parent;
  • kinship by affinity: relationship that exists between the spouse and the blood relatives of the spouse; Y
  • civil relationship: adoption.

Social function of the family

It is the responsibility of the family to promote education and good behavior in the social environment. Likewise, educate its members under the moral and social values, essential for the child’s socialization process.

In an ideal scenario, harmony, trust, security, respect, affection, protection and the necessary support when solving problems should prevail in the family.

In this sense, the family has at least two functions, one referring to children and another to adults:

  1. As for children, the family’s function is to train them so that they learn to get out of themselves and to relate to other people on an equal basis, respecting needs and diversity;
  2. As for adults, provide spaces to overcome the installation in their routines and create attitudes of openness, flexibility, solidarity and mutual encounter.

See also:

  • Family values.
  • Sacred Family.

Types of family

  • Nuclear family: It is one that is made up of father, mother and children, whether united by marriage or de facto union. At this point you can add to the compound family It is characterized by being a nuclear family plus people who have blood ties with only one of the members of the couple. For example, children of another couple who join the family nucleus.
  • Extended family: It is one that is formed with the other members of the family such as uncles, grandparents and cousins.
  • Single parent family: It is one that is formed by one of the two parents (father or mother) and their children. This is usually the result of death, divorce, abandonment or the decision to have a child independently.
  • Homoparental family: It is one in which the parents are a homosexual couple, either men or women.
  • Polygamic family: it is characterized by the simultaneous plurality of husbands or wives within the family nucleus. It has two variants: that of marriage based on polygyny (union of the man with more than one woman) or polyandry (union of the woman with several men).

Family in grammar

The word family, also known as lexical family, is a group of words that are associated with each other by reason of a common element (the root). The word family is made up of a group of words with a common ethic, understood by this, the word that has given rise to another in a different language.

For example: the following terms belong to the same lexical family: mar, marina, marinero, overseas, amarizar.

See also Grammar.

Family in biology

In biology and its associated disciplines, the word family refers to one of the taxonomic categories to classify living things according to an evolutionary scale.

The taxonomic categories are the following: domain, kingdom, phylum or division, class, order, family, genus and species.

Thus, within the taxonomic categories, family It is the group that arises from the division of the previous category (order), and the living beings that make it up share a common origin and characteristics.

For example, in the theory of the evolution of species, Hominidae They are a family that derives from the order of primates.

See also:

  • Hominid
  • Theory of evolution.

This article provides information about the meaning, features, types and functions of Family:

Family is one of the most important social institutions. Most of the world’s population lives in family units; it is an important primary group in the society. Family is the most pervasive and universal social institution. It plays a vital role in the socialisation of individuals. Family is regarded as the first society of human beings.

It is known as the first school of citizenship. One is born in family, grows in it, works for it and dies in it. One develops emotional attachment to it. The parental care imparts to the child the first lesson in social responsibility and acceptance of self-discipline. Family is the backbone of social structure. It occupies a nuclear position in society.

Meaning of Family:

Broadly speaking, family refers to the group comprising parents and children. It may also refer, in some cases, to a group of relatives and their dependants forming one household. All these refer to the compositional aspect of this institution. Another aspect is that of residence of its members.

They usually share common residence, at least for some part of their lives. Thirdly, there is the relational aspect of the family. Members have reciprocal rights and duties towards each other. Finally, the family is also an agent of socialisation. All these aspects make this institution different from all other units of social structure.

As Mack and Young say, “The family is the basic primary group and the natural matrix of personality”. According to the Bureau of Census (U.S.A.). “Family is a group of two or more persons related by blood, marriage or adoption and residing together”. Some of other important definitions of family are as follows.

According to Maclver and Page, “Family is a group defined by a sex relationship, sufficiently precise and enduring to provide for the procreation and upbringing of children”.

According to Burgess and Locke, “Family is a group of persons united by the ties of marriage, blood or adoption; consisting a single household, interacting and intercommunicating with each other in their social roles of husband and wife, mother and father, son and daughter, brother and sister creating a common culture”.

As a K. Davis defines, “Family is a group of persons whose relations to one another are based upon consanguinity and who are, therefore, kin to one another”.

According to Elliot and Meril, “Family is the biological social unit composed of husband, wife and children.

Biesanz writes “The family may be described as a woman with a child and a man to look after them”.

Strictly defined, family consists of parents and children. Its members are more closely related to one another through the process of reproduction. It is a universal institution found in every age and in every society.

Characteristics of family:

1. A Mating Relationship:

A family comes into existence when a man and woman establish mating relation between them.

2. A Form of Marriage:

Mating relationship is established through the institution of marriage. The society regulates sexual behaviour between opposite sexes through the institution of marriage. Through the institution of marriage, mating relationship is established. Without marriage family is not possible. Hence, family is a form of marriage.

3. A Common Habitation:

A family requires a home or household for its living. Without a dwelling place the task of child-bearing and child rearing cannot be adequately performed. The members of a family have a common habitation or household.

4. A System of Nomenclature:

Every family is known by a particular name. It has own system of reckoning descent. Descent may be recognized through male line or through the mother’s line. In patrilineal families descent is recognized through male line. Similarly, in matrilineal families descent is recogned through mother’s line.

5. An Economic Provision:

Every family needs an economic provision to satisfy the economic needs. The head of the family carries on certain profession and earns to maintain the family.

6. System of Interaction and Communication:

The family is composed of persons who interact and communicate with each other in their social roles such as husband and wife, mother and father, son and daughter etc.

It is important to mention that the family is composed of persons united by ties of marriage, blood or adoption. The family maintains a common but a distinctive culture.

Distinctive Features of the Family:

Family is the smallest and the most intimate group of society. It is a universal institution found in every society. Family as the most important social institution possesses certain distinctive features which may be discussed below.

1. Universality:

The Family is a universal institutions. It was found in many simpler societies. In advance societies, the whole social structure is built of family units. According to Maclver, “It is found in all societies, at all stages of social development and exists far below the human level among myriad species of animals”. Every human being is a member of some family.

2. Emotional Basis:

Every family is based on human impulses of mating, procreation, motherly devotion and parental love and care. The members of a family have emotional attachment with each other. Love between husband and wife, parents and children makes the family an institution of self-sacrifice. Hence, emotion is the foundation on which every family is built.

3. Limited Size:

The family is very small in size. It is known as the smallest primary group. It is a small social institution. It includes husband and wife and the persons who are born in it or are adopted. The relations among the members of family are direct, intimate, close, personal and permanent. This is possible only due to small size of the family. Further, smallness of the family brings stability in the family.

4. Nuclear Position:

With regard to all the different types of groupings, the family plays an important role in so far as it prepares the individual for participation in all these secondary groups, for their demands and situations. It serves as the nucleus for the growth of other types of groupings which never deal with the cultureless creatures that a newly born child is.

5. Formative Influence:

Family exerts most profound influence on its members. The personality of the individual is moulded in the family. The family customs, traditions, mores and norms have great influence in shaping the personality of its members during childhood. Family is the most effective agency of the process of socialisation and social control.

6. Responsibility of the Members:

The members of the family have a deep sense of -d. responsibility and obligation for the family. Due to this sense of responsibility, all the member discharge their duties. All the members of the family have joint responsibility. In family, the children learn about responsibility and cooperation.

7. Social Regulation:

Society, that is the collectivity, keep the collective and wider view in mind, has to ensure, by evolving mores and folkways, that the individual member in a family do perform all those functions towards each other on the basis of which the wider network of social relationships in dependent for its success. Thus, for example, there are social restrictions on divorce, in almost every society.

8. Persistance and Change:

The family may be permanent and temporary by nature. As an institution it is permanent. When a couple after marriage settle in an independent residence, the family continues to exist with other member. Hence, family is permanent as an institution. Family on the other hand is temporary and transitional. Because structure of the family changes over a time in terms of size, composition and status of persons.

Types of Family:

Though family is a universal institution, its structure or form vary from one society to another. Sociologists and anthropologists have mentioned about different types of families found in different cultures.

Classification of families is generally done on the basis of organisation (nuclear and joint), forms of marriage (monogamous or polygamous), authority (matriarchal or patriarchal) and residence etc. Classification of families on different basis is given below.

1. On the Basis of Organisation:

In terms of organisation families may be of two broad types; the nuclear family and the extended/joint family.

(i) Nuclear Family:

The nuclear family is a unit composed of husband, wife and their unmarried children. This is the predominant form in modern industrial societies. This type of family is based on companionship between parents and children.

While discussing the nature of nuclear family in India, Pauline Kolenda has discussed additions / modifications in nuclear family structure. She has given the following compositional categories.

(a) Nuclear family refers to a couple with or without children.

(b) Supplemented nuclear family indicated a nuclear family plus one or more unmarried, separated or widowed relatives of the parents, other than their unmarried children.

(c) Sub-nuclear family is defined as a fragment of a former nuclear family, for instance a widow/ widower with her/his unmarried children or siblings (unmarried or widowed or separated or divorced) living together.

(d) Single person household.

(e) Supplemented sub-nuclear family refer to a group of relatives, members of a formerly complete nuclear family along with some other unmarried, divorced or widowed relative who was not a member of the nuclear family.

The size of the nuclear family is very small. It is free from the control of elders. It is regarded as the most dominant and ideal form of family in modern society. The nuclear family is based on conjugal bonds. The children get maximum care, love and affection of the parents in nuclear family. The nuclear family is independent and economically self-sufficient. The members of nuclear family also enjoy more freedom than the members of joint family.

(ii) Extended / Joint Family:

The term extended family is used to indicate the combination of two or more nuclear families based on an extension of the parent-child relationships. According to Murdck, an extended family consists of two or more nuclear families affiliated through an extension of the parent-child relationship … i.e. by joining the nuclear family of a married adult to that of his parents.

In an extended family, a man and his wife live with the families of their married sons and with their unmarried sons and daughters, grand children or great grant children in the paternal or maternal line. Different types of extended family are still common in Asia, says Bottomore.

The patrilineally extended family is based on an extension of the father-son relationship, while the matrilineally extended family is based on the mother-daughter relationship. The extended family may also be extended horizontally to include a group consisting of two or more brothers, their wives and children. This horizontally extended family is called the fraternal or collateral family.

In India, the family weather extended vertically and/or horizontally is called the joint family. Strictly speaking it is a property-sharing unit. The joint family consists of a man and his wife and their adult sons, their wives and children and younger children of the paternal couple, says M.S. Gore.

The size of joint family is very large. Generally, the eldest male is the head of the family. The rights and duties of the members in this type of family are laid down by the hierarchy order of power and authority. Children of the joint family are children of all the male members in the parental generation.

Emphasis on conjugal ties (between husband and wife) is supposed to weaken the stability of joint family.

The father-son relationship (filial relationship) and the relationship between brothers (fraternal relationship) are more crucial for the joint family system than the conjugal relationship (husband-wife relationship).

2. On the Basis of Authority:

The family may be either patriarchal or matriarchal on the basis of authority.

(i) Patriarchal Family:

Patriarchal family is a type of family in which all authority belongs to the paternal side. In this family, the eldest male or the father is the head of the family. He exercises his authority over the members of the family. He presides over the religious rites of the household; he is the guardian of the family goods. In the developed patriarchal system of the past, the patriarch had unlimited and undisputed authority over his wife, sons and daughters.

There has been various forms of the patriarchal family. Sometimes it is part of a joint family, as in India. Sometimes it is part of a ‘stem-family’, with only one of the sons bringing his family within the paternal household.

(ii) Matriarchal Family:

It is a form of family in which authority is centred in the wife or mother. The matriarchal family system implies rule of the family by the mother, not by the father. In this type of family women are entitled to perform religious rites and husband lives in the house of wife.

Matriarchal family is also called mother-right family or maternal family under which the status, name and sometimes inheritance is transmitted through the female line. This type of family is now found among the Khasi and Garo tribes of Assam and Meghalaya, among Nayars of Malabar in Kerala.

3. On the Basis of Residence:

In terms of residence, we find following types of families.

(i) Patrilocal Family:

When the wife goes to live with the husband’s family, it is called the patrilocal family.

(ii) Matrilocal Family:

When the couple after marriage moves to live with the wife’s family, such residence is called matrilocal. The husband has a secondary position in the wife’s family where his children live.

(iii) Neolocal Residence:

When the couple after marriage moves to settle in an independent residence which is neither attached to the bride’s family of origin nor bridegroom’s family of origin it is called neolocal residence.

(iv) Avunculocal Family:

In this type of family the married couple moves to the house of the maternal uncle and live with his son after marriage. Avonculocal family is found among the Nayars of Kerala.

(v) Matri-Patri Local Family:

In matri-patrilocal family, immediately after marriage the bridegroom moves to the house of the bride and temporarily settles there till the birth of the first child and then comes back to his family of orientation, along with wife and child for permanent settlement. The Chenchuas of Andhra Pradesh live in this type of family.

4. The Basis of Descent:

On the basis of descent, families may be divided into two types such as patrilineal and matrilineal.

(i) Patrilineal Family:

When descent is traced through the father, it is called patrilineal family. In this type of family inheritance of property takes place along the male line of descent. The ancestry of such family is determined on the basis of male line or the father. A patrilineal family is also patriarchal and patrilocal. This is the common type of family prevalent today.

(ii) Matrilineal Family:

In this type of family descent is traced along the female line and inheritance of property also takes place along the female line of descent. The Veddas, the North American Indians, some people of Malabar and the Khasi tribe are matrilineal. Generally, the matrilineal families are matriarchal and matrilocal.

Besides the above types, there are other two types of family based on descent namely Bilateral and Ambilineal family. When the ancestiy or descent is traced through both father and mother, it is called bilateral family. Ambilineal family is one in which one’s ancestry may be traced through father’s line in one generation, but in the next generation one’s son may trace his descent or ancestry through his mother’s line.

5. On the Basis of Marriage:

On the basis of marriage, family has been classified into two types such as monogamous and polygamous.

(i) Monogamous Family:

A monogamous family is one which is consisted of one husband and one wife. In this type of family one man has one wife or one woman has one husband at a given time. Hence a husband and a wife living together, constitute a monogamous family. It is an ideal form of family prevalent widely.

(ii) Polygamous Family:

When one man marries several woman or one woman marries several men and constitute the family, it is polygamous family. Again polygamous family is divided into two types such as polygynous family and polyandrous family.

(a) Polygynous Family:

It is a type of family in which one man has more than one wife at a given time and lives with them and their children together. This kind of family is found among Eskimos, African Negroes and the Muslims, Naga and other tribes of central India.

(b) Polyandrous Family:

In this types of family one wife has more than one husband at given time and she lives with all of them together or each of them in turn. Polyandrous families are found among some Australians, the Sinhalese (Srilankans), the Tibetans, some Eskimos and the Todas of Nilgiri Hills in India.

6. On the basis of In-group and Out-group Affiliation:

On the basis of in-group and out-group affiliation families may be either endogamous or exogamous.

(i) Endogamous Family:

Endogamy is the practice of marrying someone within a group to which one belongs. An endogamous family is one which consists of husband and wife who belong to same group such as caste or tribe.

For example, in a caste-ridden society like India a member of a particular caste has to marry within his own caste. When a person marries within his caste group, it is called endogamous family.

(ii) Exogamous Family:

Endogamy means marriage within a group, while exogamy means marriage with someone outside his group. For example a Hindu must marry outside his Kinship group or gotra. When a family is consisted of husband and wife of different groups such as gotra is called exogamous family.

In India marriage between same gotra has been prohibited. Hence, one must marry outside his own gotra. Similarly some tribes follow the practice of clan exogamy. Accordingly, they marry outside their group (clan). The practice of clan exogamy is widely followed among the Indian tribes like the Gond, the Ho, the Khasi etc.

7. On the basis of Blood-relationship:

Ralph Linton has classified family into two main types namely, consanguine and conjugal.

(i) Consanguine Family:

The consanguine family is built upon the parent-child relationship (on blood-descent). The family is a descent group through the male line which is firmly vested with authority. The consanguine family comprises a nucleus of blood relatives surrounded by a fringe of wives and others who are incidental to the maintenance of the family unit. Such families can become very large. The Nayar family is a typical example.

(ii) Conjugal Family:

The conjugal family is a nucleus of the husband, the wife and their offspring, who are surrounded by a fringe of relatives only incidental to the functioning of the family as a unit. In this type family, the authority and solidarity of the family group reside solely in the conjugal (husband and wife) pair. In contrast to consanguine type of family, the conjugal family is much more isolated from wider kinship relationships.

The consanguine family, which is typical of an agricultural society, is large, stable, secure, self-sufficient and authoritarian. On the other hand the conjugal family, typical of a modern society, is small, transient, isolated and relatively insecure but democratic.

Functions of Family:

As a social institution the family has certain functions to perform for the society and the individual. It plays important role for survival, protection and support, socialisation and societal identification of the individual. The Family serves the society as an instrument of sexual control and cultural transmission.

Different sociologists have classified the functions of the family differently. K. Davis has mentioned four main functions of family. These are (i) reproduction (ii) maintenance, (iii) placement and (iv) socialisation of the young.

Ogbum and Nimkoff have divided the functions of family into six categories These include (1) affectional functions, (ii) economic functions, (iii) recreational functions (iv) protective functions, (v) religious and (vi) educational functions.

According to Lundberg, the following are the basic functions of family:

(1) Regulation of sexual behaviour.

(2) Care and training of the children.

(3) Cooperation and division of labour.

(4) Primary group satisfaction.

Groves has classified the functions family in the following way.

1. Protection and care of the young.

2. Regulation and control of sex impulses.

3. Conservation and transmission of social heritage and

4. Provision of opportunity for the most intimate contacts.

Maclver divides the functions of the family into two categories: Essential and Nonessential functions.

Essential Functions:

The essential functions of the family are as follows:

1. Satisfaction of Sex Needs:

This is the essential function which the family performs. The sex instinct is the natural and biological urge of human beings. The satisfaction of sex desire requires that male and female should live together as husband and wife.

Hence, family is the only place where husband and wife can satisfy their sex instinct. Family satisfies sexual desires of male and female through the institution of marriage. Without family the satisfaction of sex needs is impossible. The modern family satisfies sex instinct in a greater degree than the traditional family.

2. Reproduction:

The task of race perpetuation has always been an important function of the family. A ongoing society must replace its members. It primarily relies on the biological reproduction of its own members.

The family is an institution par excellence of the reproduction and the rearing of children. It secures a legitimate and responsible basis for procreation by regulating sexual behaviour. It provides care and personal protection to the newly born human beings and children.

3. Sustenance Function:

The family provides the daily care and personal protection to its dependant members namely aged, children etc. The family is an insurance for the individual in times of crisis. Family provides protection and shelter to orphans, widow and her children.

4. Provision of a Home:

Establishment of household life or provision of a home is another essential function of the family. The desire for a home is a powerful instinct for men as well as women. Family provides a opportunity for husband and wife to live together happily. Man after the hard work of the day returns home where in the presence of his wife and children he sheds off his fatigue.

Although there are hotels and club which provide recreation, the home is still the heaven where its members find comfort and affection. Home is the foundation of family, the meeting place of husband and wife, the birth place and play ground of children. The family is a psychological relief station in which one can safely relax.

5. Socialisation:

Man is a social animal. But he is not born human or social. He is made social through the process of socialisation. Socialisation refers to the process through which the growing individual learns the habits, attitudes, values and beliefs of the social group into which he has been born and becomes a person.

From the point of view of society, it is the process through which society transmits its culture from generation to generation and maintains itself. If a society is to endure and function successfully through time, it is to socialise the new recruits.

The family presents itself to the child as an educative group of most fundamental kind. It presents itself as a concrete manifestation of the cultural process. It is the first social environment which trains and educates the newborn child.

As Mack and Young say, “The basic socialisation of the child takes place in the family. It carries out the socialisation of the individual. It hands over the social heritage to the generations to come. The family is described as the “transfer point of civilisation”. The content of socialisation is the cultural traditions of the society, by passing them to the next generation, says Parsons. The family acts as the cultural mediator.

Non-Essential Functions:

The nonessential functions of a family can be the following ones:

1. Economic Functions:

Family serves as an economic unit. The earlier agricultural family was a self-supporting ‘business enterprise’. It was producing whatever the family needed. Today the importance of family as an economic unit has been lessened as most of the goods for consumption are purchased readymade from the market.

The family still remains as an important economic unit from the point of view of ‘consumer’s outlay’. In other words, the modern family is a consuming unit and not a self-sufficient ‘producing unit’.

2. Property Transformation:

The family acts as an agency for holding and transmission of property. Most families accumulate much property such as land, goods, money and other forms of wealth. The family transmits these property.

3. Religious Function:

Family is a centre for religious training of the children. The children learn various religious virtues from their parents. The religious and moral training of children has always been bound up with the home. Though formal religious education has reached into the earliest years the family still furnishes the matrix of religious ideas, attitudes and practice.

4. Educative Function:

The family provides the bases of all the child’s latter formal education learning. Family is the first school of children. The child learns the first letters under the guidance of parents. In the words Mazzin, the first lesson of child begins between mother’s kiss and father’s care. The child learns language, behaviour and manners from the parents. The virtues of love, cooperation, obedience, sacrifice and discipline are learnt by the child in the family.

5. Recreational Function:

The family provides recreation to its members. The members of the family visit their relations. They enjoy various occasions in the family jointly and derive pleasure. Now recreation is available in clubs and hotels rather than at home.

6. Wish Fulfillment:

The family gives moral and emotional support for the individual member, providing his defence against social isolation and loneliness and satisfying his need for personal happiness and love. The wife finds in the husband love, security, protection and strength, while the husband expects from her affection, tenderness, help and devotion.

To conclude, there are certain core functions with which the family is always and everywhere concerned. As Kingsley Davis says, there is no other social group which can perform this peculiar combination of great functions as its main societal task.

The family has given up some of the functions that it performed in the past. But by and large, the family remains the most important primary group in society for accomplishing certain essential functions.

Changing Functions of Family:

Historically, the family has been transformed from a more or less self-sufficient group into a definite and small group of minimum size. The small independent nuclear family has replaced the big consanguine family in Western advanced societies. In India too, the joint family is gradually disappearing and independent families are increasing, particularly in urban areas.

There has been a great change in the functions of the family. Modern industrialism and urbanism have created new cultural conditions. All these have profoundly affected the structure and functions of the family. The authoritarian mores of feudalism and religious control of the family and marriage have declined.

The specific characteristics of modern Western family are generally attributed to the development of industrial society, according to Ogburn and Nimkoff. In India, the changes in the joint family are also closely connected with the rise and growth of an industrial economy.

The emergence of a capitalist economy, particularly after independence, and the spread of liberalism have challenged the sentiments maintaining the joint family. With the growth of industries, life undergoes changes. Many of the traditional functions of the family have been taken away by special agencies in modern times. The changing functions of the family are discussed below.

1. Change with regard to Satisfaction of Sex Needs:

The family satisfies the sex need of male and female through the institution of marriage. But change is visible in the function of the family with regard to satisfaction of sex need. This change can be seen more in Western societies where premarital and extramarital sex relations are on the increase. A declining trend is noticeable in the regulation of sexual behaviour by the family.

2. Change in the Reproduction Function:

There is also change in the reproduction function of the family. On the one hand, Western couple do not prefer to have children. On the other hand, in some case women in Western societies become mother before they are married. Hence, reproduction is possible without marriage and family.

3. Change in Sustenance Function:

The sustenance function of the family has been taken by other agencies. Hospitals and nursing homes are now offer medical care. Government and other non-Government organizations provide protection and care to aged persons. Patients are admitted to hospitals or nursing homes and they are taken care of by doctors, nurses and midwives.

4. Change in Socialisation Function:

The industrial system has made necessary for women to go to the office, the school or the factory to work for a wage. As a result they do not get much time to socialise the children. Thus, there is the decline of the family as an agent of socialisation. The socialisation function of the family has been taken over by the outside agencies.

5. Changes in Economic Functions:

The earlier agricultural family with its numerous economic functions was a self-supporting ‘ business enterprise’. The home was the centre of production, distribution and consumption. Today the importance of family as an economic unit has been lessened as most of the goods for consumption are purchased from the market.

The modern family is a consuming unit. But it is not a self-sufficient producing unit. Some of the functions have been transferred to outside agencies, for example cooking of launches to restaurants and canteens, some laundering to outside laundries.

6. Changes in Educational Functions:

The modern family has transferred the educational function to outside agencies such as nursery schools, Kindergarten and Montessori schools. The responsibility of the family in imparting education to children has declined considerably. The modern family has delegated the task of vocational education to technical institutions and colleges.

7. Changes in Religious Function:

Family is a centre for religious training of the children and various religious activities. Now it is found that the family is losing the religious functions performed in the past. The religious activities of the family has been materially reduced.

8. Changes in the Recreational Function:

Earlier, the family provided all kinds of recreation and entertainment to its members. Recreation is now available in clubs or hotels rather than homes. The recreational function of the family have been declined to a large extent. Various outside recreational centres such as clubs, cinema halls, park etc. provide recreational facilities to people. The family is no longer a home for recreation of its members.

From the above discussion it is clear that there has been a great change in the functions of the family. Many family duties which were discharged formerly by the parents have now been transferred to external agencies. The educational, religious, recreational and protective functions have been more or less taken over by schools, churches, Government and commercial recreational agencies.

In short, the family has lost some of its functions or losing many functions, performed in the past. However, the process is gradual and not everywhere the same. Despite its structural and functional changes, the family still holds a unique position among the innumerable institutions.

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • What is the meaning of the word distribution
  • What is the meaning of the word distinct
  • What is the meaning of the word dis
  • What is the meaning of the word democracy
  • What is the meaning of the word deceptively