What is a compound word for house

8 letter words containing house. hothouse. outhouse. alehouse. madhouse.

What is a fancy name for bedroom?

master bedroom

• bedchamber.
• bedroom.
• boudoir.
• sleeping chamber.

What do you call a big bedroom?

The term master bedroom was first used to describe the largest bedroom with attached bathroom of an expensive home in the 1926 Sears catalog, and since that time, it has been generally accepted to identify the largest bedroom in a home or apartment.

What are master bedrooms called now?

What were once called master bedrooms and master bathrooms are now referred to as primary bedrooms and primary bathrooms by the Houston Association of Realtors. The group made the change following a review of terminology, according to KPRC. It has been a topic of discussion for several years, the agency said.

What word can I use instead of master?

What is another word for master?

Why are master bedrooms called master bedrooms?

The term ‘master bedroom’ first appeared in the early 20th century to denote that the room was reserved for the master of the household, who almost always was a man.

Is it OK to say master bedroom?

The origins of the term are unclear, but some brokers nonetheless find it offensive and inappropriate. The Houston Association of Realtors was the first industry group to decide to stop using “master bedroom” in late June, after some members expressed concerns that it could be perceived as racist or sexist.

Can we still say master bedroom?

These distinct real estate terms all refer to the same domestic space: the largest bedroom in a home, likely with an en-suite bath. Of the three, “master bedroom” is the one currently being reexamined, leading many industry professionals to phase it out of their lexicons altogether.

What can I use instead of a master bedroom?

The Houston Association of Realtors just made the change, replacing the terms master bedroom and master bathroom with “primary” bedrooms and baths. Many builders have already adapted, using “owner’s suite,” instead.

What is a master bedroom called in England?

The term ‘master bedroom’ will no longer be used by dozens of estate agents in England due to its allusions to sexism and slavery. They will instead be introduced to the ‘primary’ or ‘principal’ bedroom reported The Times.

What is a good size master bedroom?

about 200 to 250 square feet

What is a normal bedroom size?

11 feet by 12 feet

Can a king size bed fit in a 12 by 12 room?

A king bed can fit in a 12′ by 12′ space, assuming you’re considering a standard bed. However, most people who have king beds in average-sized rooms will find the beds to be just a little too spacious for the room’s dimensions.

Recommended textbook solutions

Compounding (also known as composition or nominal composition) is important in linguistics because it allows for new words to be made and exists in most, if not all, languages. For some languages (like Chinese) it is a major source of new word formation.

Fig. 1 — Compounding combines words to create new words.

Stress

Stress in pronunciation is when we place greater emphasis on one syllable or word than on other parts of a sentence; this usually helps us to recognize and understand the meaning of a word.

A closed (or solid) compound is written as one word.

Exocentric compounds

With exocentric compounds, the meaning is not obvious and often seems unrelated to any part of the compound itself.

For example, actor-manager means someone who is an actor and a theatre manager.

Table summary

Possessive or bahuvrihi compounds are often used in English to describe characteristics of people, and can be figurative, or non-literal, in their meaning.

Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them. (Joseph Heller, 1923-1999)

Compounding
or word-composition
is
one
of the major and highly productive types of word-formation, one of
the potent means of replenishment of English word-stock. This type of
word formation was very productive in Old English and it hasn’t
lost its productivity till present time. More than one third of all
the new words in modern English are compound words. Compound words as
the term itself suggests are lexical units of complex structure.

Many
definitions offered by linguists (А.I.Smirnitsky, I.V.Аrnold,
О.D.Меshkov, H.Маrchаnd, О.Jesрersеn, R.V.Zаndvоrt) соme
to the following one: a
compound word is a lexical unit formed by joining together two or
more derivational bases and singled out in speech due to its
integrity.

The
derivational bases may be of different degrees of complexity as, e.g.
arm-chair,
prizefighter, fancy-dress-maker, forget-me-not, merry-go-round,
pay-as-you-earn,
etc. Notwithstanding the fact that many linguists devoted their
researches to word-composition, still some of the issues concerning
this type of word formation are open to debate. One of the
difficulties is the problem of distinguishing compound words from
word combinations (word-groups, phrases). Comparing such compound
words as
running water
‘water coming from a mains supply – Rus. водопровод’
a
dancing—girl
‘a professional dancer – Rus. танцовщица’ with the
word combinations running
water
‘water that runs – Rus. проточная вода’ and
a dancing girl
‘a girl who is dancing – Rus. танцующая девушка’
and many others, it is difficult to determine whether we deal with
compound words or word combinations.

The
most important property of compound words is their integrity (see
section 1 of chapter I) which is understood as impossibility to
insert other units of the language (morphemes, words) between the
components of a compound word. Integrity might be also considered
the basic criterion of distinguishing compound words from word
combinations and other language units. Compound words possess both
structural and semantic integrity.

Structural
integrity of compound words manifests itself in the fixed
order of
their components. The second IC (Immediate Constituent) is in
overwhelming majority of compound words the structural and semantic
centre, the onomasiological basis of the word. In compound words like
a
house-dog
and a
dog-house
and many others, it is the second component that determines the part
of speech, i.e. lexico-grammatical properties of the compound, and
its referent, or what actually the word denotes, while the first
component modifies the meaning of the second one:
a house-dog
– a
dog
trained to guard a house; a
dog-house
– a
house
for a dog.

For
some types of compound words the indication of integrity is the
reverse order of the components as compared with word combinations.
It is the case of the compounds with the second components expressed
by adjectives and participles, e.g.
oil-rich, man-made.
In the synonymous word combinations the word order is: rich
in oil, made by man.

There
are other criteria employed for distinguishing compound words from
word combinations taking into account various aspects of compound
words. The phonetic
(phonic) criterion rests
on the marked tendency in English to give compounds a heavy stress on
the first component. It is true that compound words in many cases are
given single, or the so-called unity stress; or two stresses – a
primary and a secondary one. Such stress patterns differ from the
stress patterns of word combinations where each notional word is
stressed. For instance, each of the words road
and
house
is stressed in a word combination, e.g. a
`house
by the `road
but when they make up a compound word a `roadhouse ‘a building on a
main road’ the stress pattern is changed, the word acquires a unity
stress on the first component or double stress (the primary and
secondary ones) as in the words `blood-vessel,
`washing-maֽِchine.
The phonic criterion will prove that `laughing
`boys
‘the boys who are laughing’ is a word combination (word group)
but `laughing-gas
‘gas used in dental surgery’ is a compound word. However, not
infrequent are the cases with the so-called level stress when each
component is equally stressed: `arm-`chair,
`snow-`white,
`icy-`cold.
Hence, the phonic criterion is not quite reliable.

The
structural integrity of a compound word differing from structural
separateness of a word combination is backed up by the morphological
(morphemic)
criterion.
A
sequence of components making up a
compound
word is a morphemic unity and it has a single paradigm. It means that
the grammatical inflections are added to the word as a whole but not
to its separate parts, e.g. earthquake
– earthquakes,
weekend – weekends.
In a word combination each of the component parts is morphemically
independent and may attract the grammatical inflections (сf.
age-long
and ages
ago).
This criterion, however, is limited for the English language because
of the scarcity of its grammatical morphemic means.

To
the syntactic
criterion
besides the above-mentioned fixed order of the components refers the
character of
syntactic
relations. The components of compound words cannot enter into the
syntactic
relations
of their own. Thus in the word combination (a
factory)
financed
by the government
each notional word may be modified by an attribute: a
factory generously
financed by the British
government
(the example is borrowed from [Мешков 1976: 182]). None of the
components of a compound word can be modified by an attribute:
*generously
government-financed.
Modifying a component of a compound word is only possible by
introducing one more component into the structure of a compound word:
Labour-government-financed.
However, syntactic parameters do not unambiguously solve the problem
of distinguishing a compound word from a word combination because the
collocability of the components of word combinations may be limited.

The
semantic
criterion presupposes
the semantic integrity of a compound word, close semantic links
between its components. According to this criterion the following
examples refer to compound words: daybreak,
blackmail,
killjoy
and
many others. But the semantic criterion seems to be the most
unreliable one as it is not always possible to objectively determine
to what extent the components are semantically linked together.
Besides it is impossible to draw a line between compound words and
phraseological units, idioms which are characterized by semantic
unity.

As
one more criterion of structural integrity of compound words might be
named the graphic
criterion.
The majority of compound words are spelled either solidly or with a
hyphen. But there is no consistency in English spelling in this
respect. The same words may be spelt either solidly, with a hyphen or
with a break. The spelling varies with different texts and even
dictionaries (e.g. airline,
air-line, air line).
There is statistic data concerning the variability of spelling, e.g.
complexes with the first components well-,
ill—
(e.g. ill-advised,
ill-affected,
well-dressed,
well-aimed)
in 34 % cases are spelt with a break, in 66% with a hyphen
[Харитончик 1992: 180]. The vacillations in spelling are
most frequent in ‘n + n’ pattern: war(-)time,
money(-)order, post(-)card,
etc. E. Pаrtridge in his book “Usage and Abusage” writes that a
compound word goes through three stages in its evolution: (1) two
separate words (cat
bird);
(2) a compound word spelt with a hyphen (cat-bird);
(3) a solidly spelt word (catbird).
Thus, solid spelling of compounds is manifestation of language
consciousness, the moment when the lexical unit is perceived as
having acquired a semantic unity. Solid or hyphenated spellings are
indications of compound words, although cases of a break between
components allow of various interpretations.

So
far not a single criterion is reliable enough to identify compound
words. Moreover, even a combination of criteria is not sufficient
enough to unequivocally decide whether the lexical unit is a compound
word or a word combination.

The
second aspect of the issue of identification of compound words and
determining the types of word-formation is the problem of delineation
between compounding and other types of word-formation resulting in
appearance of compound words. Such words as long-legged,
three-cornered,
schoolmasterish
are complex in their morphological structure but according to the
type of word formation they refer to suffixal derivatives. Their
derivational patterns are as follows: long-legged
~ (long
+ leg)
+-ed
~ (a + n) + sf , but not long
+ legged,
as there is no such a derivational base as *legged.
By analogy: three-cornered
~ (num + n) + sf, schoolmasterish
~ (n + n) + sf. Such words are considered to be compound
derivatives.
They must be distinguished from the words of the type pen-holder,
tongue-twister,
which are derived by compounding, i.e. bringing together two
derivational bases pen
+
(hold
+ —er)
~
n + (n + sf), which are compound words.

Besides
suffixal
compound
derivatives to compound derivatives refer the words formed by
conversion: breakthrough
n. from to
break through,
breakdown
n. from to
break down,
based on V > N pattern, to
blackmail
from blackmail
n. (N > V), back formation (see the next section 5):
to baby-sit
from baby-sitter,
to
fact-find
from fact-finding
‘inquiring into facts’.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]

• #
• #
• #
• #
• #
• #
• #
• #
• #
• #
• #