WORD STRUCTURE IN MODERN ENGLISH
I. The morphological structure of a word. Morphemes. Types of morphemes. Allomorphs.
II. Structural types of words.
III. Principles of morphemic analysis.
IV. Derivational level of analysis. Stems. Types of stems. Derivational types of words.
I. The morphological structure of a word. Morphemes. Types of Morphemes. Allomorphs.
There are two levels of approach to the study of word- structure: the level of morphemic analysis and the level of derivational or word-formation analysis.
Word is the principal and basic unit of the language system, the largest on the morphologic and the smallest on the syntactic plane of linguistic analysis.
It has been universally acknowledged that a great many words have a composite nature and are made up of morphemes, the basic units on the morphemic level, which are defined as the smallest indivisible two-facet language units.
The term morpheme is derived from Greek morphe “form ”+ -eme. The Greek suffix –eme has been adopted by linguistic to denote the smallest unit or the minimum distinctive feature.
The morpheme is the smallest meaningful unit of form. A form in these cases a recurring discrete unit of speech. Morphemes occur in speech only as constituent parts of words, not independently, although a word may consist of single morpheme. Even a cursory examination of the morphemic structure of English words reveals that they are composed of morphemes of different types: root-morphemes and affixational morphemes. Words that consist of a root and an affix are called derived words or derivatives and are produced by the process of word building known as affixation (or derivation).
The root-morpheme is the lexical nucleus of the word; it has a very general and abstract lexical meaning common to a set of semantically related words constituting one word-cluster, e.g. (to) teach, teacher, teaching. Besides the lexical meaning root-morphemes possess all other types of meaning proper to morphemes except the part-of-speech meaning which is not found in roots.
Affixational morphemes include inflectional affixes or inflections and derivational affixes. Inflections carry only grammatical meaning and are thus relevant only for the formation of word-forms. Derivational affixes are relevant for building various types of words. They are lexically always dependent on the root which they modify. They possess the same types of meaning as found in roots, but unlike root-morphemes most of them have the part-of-speech meaning which makes them structurally the important part of the word as they condition the lexico-grammatical class the word belongs to. Due to this component of their meaning the derivational affixes are classified into affixes building different parts of speech: nouns, verbs, adjectives or adverbs.
Roots and derivational affixes are generally easily distinguished and the difference between them is clearly felt as, e.g., in the words helpless, handy, blackness, Londoner, refill, etc.: the root-morphemes help-, hand-, black-, London-, fill-, are understood as the lexical centers of the words, and –less, -y, -ness, -er, re- are felt as morphemes dependent on these roots.
Distinction is also made of free and bound morphemes.
Free morphemes coincide with word-forms of independently functioning words. It is obvious that free morphemes can be found only among roots, so the morpheme boy- in the word boy is a free morpheme; in the word undesirable there is only one free morpheme desire-; the word pen-holder has two free morphemes pen- and hold-. It follows that bound morphemes are those that do not coincide with separate word- forms, consequently all derivational morphemes, such as –ness, -able, -er are bound. Root-morphemes may be both free and bound. The morphemes theor- in the words theory, theoretical, or horr- in the words horror, horrible, horrify; Angl- in Anglo-Saxon; Afr- in Afro-Asian are all bound roots as there are no identical word-forms.
It should also be noted that morphemes may have different phonemic shapes. In the word-cluster please , pleasing , pleasure , pleasant the phonemic shapes of the word stand in complementary distribution or in alternation with each other. All the representations of the given morpheme, that manifest alternation are called allomorphs/or morphemic variants/ of that morpheme.
The combining form allo- from Greek allos “other” is used in linguistic terminology to denote elements of a group whose members together consistute a structural unit of the language (allophones, allomorphs). Thus, for example, -ion/ -tion/ -sion/ -ation are the positional variants of the same suffix, they do not differ in meaning or function but show a slight difference in sound form depending on the final phoneme of the preceding stem. They are considered as variants of one and the same morpheme and called its allomorphs.
Allomorph is defined as a positional variant of a morpheme occurring in a specific environment and so characterized by complementary description.
Complementary distribution is said to take place, when two linguistic variants cannot appear in the same environment.
Different morphemes are characterized by contrastive distribution, i.e. if they occur in the same environment they signal different meanings. The suffixes –able and –ed, for instance, are different morphemes, not allomorphs, because adjectives in –able mean “ capable of beings”.
Allomorphs will also occur among prefixes. Their form then depends on the initials of the stem with which they will assimilate.
Two or more sound forms of a stem existing under conditions of complementary distribution may also be regarded as allomorphs, as, for instance, in long a: length n.
II. Structural types of words.
The morphological analysis of word- structure on the morphemic level aims at splitting the word into its constituent morphemes – the basic units at this level of analysis – and at determining their number and types. The four types (root words, derived words, compound, shortenings) represent the main structural types of Modern English words, and conversion, derivation and composition the most productive ways of word building.
According to the number of morphemes words can be classified into monomorphic and polymorphic. Monomorphic or root-words consist of only one root-morpheme, e.g. small, dog, make, give, etc. All polymorphic word fall into two subgroups: derived words and compound words – according to the number of root-morphemes they have. Derived words are composed of one root-morpheme and one or more derivational morphemes, e.g. acceptable, outdo, disagreeable, etc. Compound words are those which contain at least two root-morphemes, the number of derivational morphemes being insignificant. There can be both root- and derivational morphemes in compounds as in pen-holder, light-mindedness, or only root-morphemes as in lamp-shade, eye-ball, etc.
These structural types are not of equal importance. The clue to the correct understanding of their comparative value lies in a careful consideration of: 1)the importance of each type in the existing wordstock, and 2) their frequency value in actual speech. Frequency is by far the most important factor. According to the available word counts made in different parts of speech, we find that derived words numerically constitute the largest class of words in the existing wordstock; derived nouns comprise approximately 67% of the total number, adjectives about 86%, whereas compound nouns make about 15% and adjectives about 4%. Root words come to 18% in nouns, i.e. a trifle more than the number of compound words; adjectives root words come to approximately 12%.
But we cannot fail to perceive that root-words occupy a predominant place. In English, according to the recent frequency counts, about 60% of the total number of nouns and 62% of the total number of adjectives in current use are root-words. Of the total number of adjectives and nouns, derived words comprise about 38% and 37% respectively while compound words comprise an insignificant 2% in nouns and 0.2% in adjectives. Thus it is the root-words that constitute the foundation and the backbone of the vocabulary and that are of paramount importance in speech. It should also be mentioned that root words are characterized by a high degree of collocability and a complex variety of meanings in contrast with words of other structural types whose semantic structures are much poorer. Root- words also serve as parent forms for all types of derived and compound words.
III. Principles of morphemic analysis.
In most cases the morphemic structure of words is transparent enough and individual morphemes clearly stand out within the word. The segmentation of words is generally carried out according to the method of Immediate and Ultimate Constituents. This method is based on the binary principle, i.e. each stage of the procedure involves two components the word immediately breaks into. At each stage these two components are referred to as the Immediate Constituents. Each Immediate Constituent at the next stage of analysis is in turn broken into smaller meaningful elements. The analysis is completed when we arrive at constituents incapable of further division, i.e. morphemes. These are referred to Ultimate Constituents.
A synchronic morphological analysis is most effectively accomplished by the procedure known as the analysis into Immediate Constituents. ICs are the two meaningful parts forming a large linguistic unity.
The method is based on the fact that a word characterized by morphological divisibility is involved in certain structural correlations. To sum up: as we break the word we obtain at any level only ICs one of which is the stem of the given word. All the time the analysis is based on the patterns characteristic of the English vocabulary. As a pattern showing the interdependence of all the constituents segregated at various stages, we obtain the following formula:
un+ { [ ( gent- + -le ) + -man ] + -ly}
Breaking a word into its Immediate Constituents we observe in each cut the structural order of the constituents.
A diagram presenting the four cuts described looks as follows:
1. un- / gentlemanly
2. un- / gentleman / — ly
3. un- / gentle / — man / — ly
4. un- / gentl / — e / — man / — ly
A similar analysis on the word-formation level showing not only the morphemic constituents of the word but also the structural pattern on which it is built.
The analysis of word-structure at the morphemic level must proceed to the stage of Ultimate Constituents. For example, the noun friendliness is first segmented into the ICs: [frendlı-] recurring in the adjectives friendly-looking and friendly and [-nıs] found in a countless number of nouns, such as unhappiness, blackness, sameness, etc. the IC [-nıs] is at the same time an UC of the word, as it cannot be broken into any smaller elements possessing both sound-form and meaning. Any further division of –ness would give individual speech-sounds which denote nothing by themselves. The IC [frendlı-] is next broken into the ICs [-lı] and [frend-] which are both UCs of the word.
Morphemic analysis under the method of Ultimate Constituents may be carried out on the basis of two principles: the so-called root-principle and affix principle.
According to the affix principle the splitting of the word into its constituent morphemes is based on the identification of the affix within a set of words, e.g. the identification of the suffix –er leads to the segmentation of words singer, teacher, swimmer into the derivational morpheme – er and the roots teach- , sing-, drive-.
According to the root-principle, the segmentation of the word is based on the identification of the root-morpheme in a word-cluster, for example the identification of the root-morpheme agree- in the words agreeable, agreement, disagree.
As a rule, the application of these principles is sufficient for the morphemic segmentation of words.
However, the morphemic structure of words in a number of cases defies such analysis, as it is not always so transparent and simple as in the cases mentioned above. Sometimes not only the segmentation of words into morphemes, but the recognition of certain sound-clusters as morphemes become doubtful which naturally affects the classification of words. In words like retain, detain, contain or receive, deceive, conceive, perceive the sound-clusters [rı-], [dı-] seem to be singled quite easily, on the other hand, they undoubtedly have nothing in common with the phonetically identical prefixes re-, de- as found in words re-write, re-organize, de-organize, de-code. Moreover, neither the sound-cluster [rı-] or [dı-], nor the [-teın] or [-sı:v] possess any lexical or functional meaning of their own. Yet, these sound-clusters are felt as having a certain meaning because [rı-] distinguishes retain from detain and [-teın] distinguishes retain from receive.
It follows that all these sound-clusters have a differential and a certain distributional meaning as their order arrangement point to the affixal status of re-, de-, con-, per- and makes one understand —tain and –ceive as roots. The differential and distributional meanings seem to give sufficient ground to recognize these sound-clusters as morphemes, but as they lack lexical meaning of their own, they are set apart from all other types of morphemes and are known in linguistic literature as pseudo- morphemes. Pseudo- morphemes of the same kind are also encountered in words like rusty-fusty.
IV. Derivational level of analysis. Stems. Types of Stems. Derivational types of word.
The morphemic analysis of words only defines the constituent morphemes, determining their types and their meaning but does not reveal the hierarchy of the morphemes comprising the word. Words are no mere sum totals of morpheme, the latter reveal a definite, sometimes very complex interrelation. Morphemes are arranged according to certain rules, the arrangement differing in various types of words and particular groups within the same types. The pattern of morpheme arrangement underlies the classification of words into different types and enables one to understand how new words appear in the language. These relations within the word and the interrelations between different types and classes of words are known as derivative or word- formation relations.
The analysis of derivative relations aims at establishing a correlation between different types and the structural patterns words are built on. The basic unit at the derivational level is the stem.
The stem is defined as that part of the word which remains unchanged throughout its paradigm, thus the stem which appears in the paradigm (to) ask ( ), asks, asked, asking is ask-; thestem of the word singer ( ), singer’s, singers, singers’ is singer-. It is the stem of the word that takes the inflections which shape the word grammatically as one or another part of speech.
The structure of stems should be described in terms of IC’s analysis, which at this level aims at establishing the patterns of typical derivative relations within the stem and the derivative correlation between stems of different types.
There are three types of stems: simple, derived and compound.
Simple stems are semantically non-motivated and do not constitute a pattern on analogy with which new stems may be modeled. Simple stems are generally monomorphic and phonetically identical with the root morpheme. The derivational structure of stems does not always coincide with the result of morphemic analysis. Comparison proves that not all morphemes relevant at the morphemic level are relevant at the derivational level of analysis. It follows that bound morphemes and all types of pseudo- morphemes are irrelevant to the derivational structure of stems as they do not meet requirements of double opposition and derivative interrelations. So the stem of such words as retain, receive, horrible, pocket, motion, etc. should be regarded as simple, non- motivated stems.
Derived stems are built on stems of various structures though which they are motivated, i.e. derived stems are understood on the basis of the derivative relations between their IC’s and the correlated stems. The derived stems are mostly polymorphic in which case the segmentation results only in one IC that is itself a stem, the other IC being necessarily a derivational affix.
Derived stems are not necessarily polymorphic.
Compound stems are made up of two IC’s, both of which are themselves stems, for example match-box, driving-suit, pen-holder, etc. It is built by joining of two stems, one of which is simple, the other derived.
In more complex cases the result of the analysis at the two levels sometimes seems even to contracted one another.
The derivational types of words are classified according to the structure of their stems into simple, derived and compound words.
Derived words are those composed of one root- morpheme and one or more derivational morpheme.
Compound words contain at least two root- morphemes, the number of derivational morphemes being insignificant.
Derivational compound is a word formed by a simultaneous process of composition and derivational.
Compound words proper are formed by joining together stems of word already available in the language.
Теги:
Word structure in modern english
Реферат
Английский
Просмотров: 27703
Найти в Wikkipedia статьи с фразой: Word structure in modern english
Скачать материал
Скачать материал
- Сейчас обучается 396 человек из 63 регионов
- Сейчас обучается 268 человек из 64 регионов
Описание презентации по отдельным слайдам:
-
1 слайд
Morphological Structure of English Words
-
2 слайд
The word as an autonomous unit of the language system should be distinguished from another fundamental language unit – the morpheme.
-
3 слайд
A morpheme
Is an association of a given meaning with a given sound pattern, which makes it similar to a word.
Unlike a word, a morpheme is not autonomous, morphemes occur in speech only as constituent parts of words.
Cannot be divided into smaller meaningful units, so it is defined as the minimum meaningful unit of the language system. -
4 слайд
According to their form
Morphemes
Free
Bound
Semi-bound
(semi-free) -
5 слайд
Free morphemes
Are capable of forming words without adding other morphemes, which means that they coincide with the stems or independent forms of words:
House- (morpheme) = house (word)
Shoe- (morpheme) = shoe (word)
Bread- (morpheme) = bread (word) -
6 слайд
Bound morphemes
May not stand alone without a loss or change of their meaning, they are always bound to something else. It means that they do not coincide with stems or independent forms of words:
Horr- (morpheme) – horr-or (word)
Agit- (morpheme) – agit-ate (word)
Nat- (morpheme) – nat-ion (word)
-Ible (morpheme) – elig-ible (word)
Pre- (morpheme) – pre-war (word) -
7 слайд
Free and Bound morphemes
Prefixes and suffixes (jointly called derivational affixes) are always bound
Root morphemes may be both free and bound
Bound root morphemes are mainly found among loan words: arrog-ance, char-ity, cour-age, dis-tort, in-volve, toler-able, etc. -
8 слайд
Semi-bound (semi-free) morphemes
Can function in a morphemic sequence both as an affix and as a free morpheme:
E.g., the morphemes «well» and «half» can occur as free morphemes (cf. sleep well, half an hour) or as bound morphemes (cf. well-known, half-done) -
9 слайд
According to their role in constructing words
Morphemes
Roots
Affixes -
10 слайд
According to their position in a word
Affixes
Prefixes
Suffixes
Infixes
(unproductive
in English) -
11 слайд
According to their function and meaning
Affixes
Derivational
Functional
(Endings,
inflexions) -
12 слайд
A stem
When a derivational or functional affix is stripped from the word, what remains is a stem (a stem base)
If a stem consists of a single morpheme, it is simple (heart, fact, month, red, etc.)
If a stem consists of a root and an affix, it is derived (hearty, factual, monthly, reddish, etc.)
If a stem consists of two root morphemes (and an affix / affixes), it is compound (teaspoon, mother-in-law, dog-owner, looking-glass, etc.) -
13 слайд
A root
Is the main morphemic vehicle of a given idea in a given language at a given stage of its development
Is the ultimate constituent element which remains after the removal of all functional and derivational affixes and does not admit any further analysis
Is the common element of words within a word-cluster (cf. heart, hearten, dishearten, heartily, heartless, hearty, heartiness, sweetheart, heart-broken, etc.) -
14 слайд
A root
The etymological treatment of root morphemes encourages a search for cognates (elements descended from a common ancestor):
Heart (English) – cor (Latin) – kardia (Greek) – corazon (Spanish) – Herz (German) – сердце (Russian), etc. -
15 слайд
A suffix
Is a derivational morpheme following the stem and forming a new derivative in a different part of speech or a different word class: luck – luck-y – luck-i-ly -
16 слайд
A prefix
Is a derivational morpheme standing before the root and modifying the meaning of the original word: happy – unhappy, president – ex-president, argument – counter-argument, etc. -
17 слайд
A prefix
Prefixes do not generally change the part-of-speech meaning of the resultant word
An exception to the rule is the formation of some verbs and statives: friend, n – befriend, v; earth, n – unearth (выкапывать, вырывать из земли, доставать из-под земли), v; sleep, n – asleep (stative), etc. -
18 слайд
An infix
Is an affix placed within the word: -n- in «stand» (this type is not productive). -
19 слайд
Combining forms
Affixes should not be confused with combining forms
A combining form is a bound form that is distinguished from an affix historically by the fact that it is always borrowed from another language in which it existed as a free or combining form. -
20 слайд
Combining forms
Most combining forms were borrowed from Latin and Greek (however, not exclusively) and have thus become international:
Cyclo- (from Greek «kuklos» — circle): cyclometer, cyclopedia, cyclic, bicycle, etc.
Mal- (from French «mal» — bad): malfunction, malnutrition, etc.
Compound and derivative words which these combining forms are part of never existed in their original language but were coined only in modern times. -
21 слайд
Morphemic and Structural Analysis of English Words
-
22 слайд
Morphemic analysis
Implies stating the number and type of morphemes that make up the word:
Girl (one root morpheme) – a root word
Girlish (one root morpheme plus one affix) – a derived word
Girl-friend (two stems) – a compound word
Last-minuter (two stems and a common affix) – a compound derivative -
23 слайд
Structural word-formation analysis
Studies the structural correlation with other words as well as the structural patterns or rules on which words are built
-
24 слайд
Structural word-formation analysis
A correlation is a set of binary oppositions, in which each second element is derived from the first by a general rule valid for all members of the relation:
Child – childish
Woman – womanish
Monkey – monkeyish
Spinster – spinsterish, etc. -
25 слайд
Structural word-formation analysis
This correlation demonstrates that
in English there is a type of derived adjectives consisting of a noun stem and a suffix –ish;
the stems are mostly those of animate nouns;
any one word built according to this pattern contains a semantic component common to the whole group, namely «typical of, or having the bad qualities of». -
26 слайд
Morphological Analysis of English Words
-
27 слайд
A synchronic morphological analysis (introduced by
L. Bloomfield)
Is accomplished by the procedure known as the analysis into immediate constituents
The main opposition here is the opposition of stem and affix which reveals the motivation of the word -
28 слайд
A synchronic morphological analysis
Ungentlemanly
Un-
gentlemanly
gentleman
ly
gentle
man
gent
le -
29 слайд
A synchronic morphological analysis
Un- is split after the pattern: un- + adjective stem (uncertain, unconscious, uneasy, unearthly, untimely, unwomanly, etc.);
-Ly is split following the pattern: noun stem + -ly (womanly, masterly, scholarly, etc.);
Gentleman is split into gentle- + -man after a similar pattern observed in «nobleman» (adjective stem + the semi-affix -man)
Gentle is split into gent- + -le following the pattern: noun stem + -le (brittle, fertile, juvenile, noble, subtle, little, etc.) -
30 слайд
A synchronic morphological analysis
The constituents that allow further splitting into morphemes are called immediate (gentlemanly, gentleman, gentle),
Those that don’t allow this are termed ultimate (un-, -ly, gent-, le-, -man). -
31 слайд
A synchronic morphological analysis
The procedure of the analysis into immediate constituents is reduced to the recognition and classification of the same and different morphemes as well as same and different patterns: thus it permits the tracing and understanding of the vocabulary system. -
32 слайд
Thank you for your attention!
Найдите материал к любому уроку, указав свой предмет (категорию), класс, учебник и тему:
6 209 898 материалов в базе
- Выберите категорию:
- Выберите учебник и тему
- Выберите класс:
-
Тип материала:
-
Все материалы
-
Статьи
-
Научные работы
-
Видеоуроки
-
Презентации
-
Конспекты
-
Тесты
-
Рабочие программы
-
Другие методич. материалы
-
Найти материалы
Другие материалы
- 02.12.2020
- 132
- 0
- 26.10.2020
- 449
- 4
- 15.08.2020
- 157
- 0
- 08.08.2020
- 396
- 0
- 26.07.2020
- 75
- 0
- 09.06.2020
- 558
- 13
- 05.06.2020
- 91
- 1
- 06.05.2020
- 519
- 2
Вам будут интересны эти курсы:
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Управление персоналом и оформление трудовых отношений»
-
Курс повышения квалификации «Основы управления проектами в условиях реализации ФГОС»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Экскурсоведение: основы организации экскурсионной деятельности»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Клиническая психология: теория и методика преподавания в образовательной организации»
-
Курс повышения квалификации «Организация практики студентов в соответствии с требованиями ФГОС юридических направлений подготовки»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Организация деятельности по подбору и оценке персонала (рекрутинг)»
-
Курс повышения квалификации «Маркетинг в организации как средство привлечения новых клиентов»
-
Курс повышения квалификации «Разработка бизнес-плана и анализ инвестиционных проектов»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Управление сервисами информационных технологий»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Организация технической поддержки клиентов при установке и эксплуатации информационно-коммуникационных систем»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Корпоративная культура как фактор эффективности современной организации»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Политология: взаимодействие с органами государственной власти и управления, негосударственными и международными организациями»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Уголовно-правовые дисциплины: теория и методика преподавания в образовательной организации»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Гостиничный менеджмент: организация управления текущей деятельностью»
-
Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Информационная поддержка бизнес-процессов в организации»
Plan
1. The structure of English words and its specific features.
2. Different types of words.
3. Various ways of word-building in English.
4. Conversion as a non-affixed word-building device.
If we define a word as an autonomous unit of language in which a given meaning is associated with a given sound complex which is susceptible of a given grammatical employment and able to form a sentence by itself we’ll have the possibility to distinguish it from the оther fundamental language unit — the morpheme.
The morpheme is also an association of a given meaning with a given sound pattern. But unlike a word it is not autonomous. Morphemes occur in speech only as constituent parts of words, not independently. Morphemes are not divisible into smaller meaningful units. That’s why the morpheme may be defined as the minimum meaningful language unit. According to the role, morphemes may play in constructing words, they are subdivided into roots and affixes.
The morpheme which bears the main lexical meaning of the word is called a root morpheme. If we take such groups of words as end, ending, endless, unending, endlessness, endlessly or boy, boyhood, boyish, the morphemes which are the lexical nuclei of the words are end and boy.
A root may be also regarded as the ultimate constituent element which remains after the removal of all affixes and does not admit any further analysis. It is the common element of words within a word-family. Thus «heart»; is the common root of the following words: heart, heartily, heartless, hearty, heartiness, kind-hearted, etc.
Alongside with root morphemes there exist affixational morphemes or affixes which are subdivided into suffixes and prefixes.
According to their function and meaning affixes are further subdivided into derivational аnd inflexious which carry only grammatical meaning and are used for the formation of word-forms.
We must distinguish a root from a stem. A root together with derivational affixes makes up a stem.
e.g. Pave – ment — s
â â â
pavements root derivational form-changing
suffix suffix
stem
The stem оf the word “smaller” is “small”, “gives” – “give”.
Roots and derivational affixes are easily distinguished and the difference between them is clearly felt.
It should be noted that in different positions some morphemes may take different phonetic shapes. Thus, for instance, -ion/ tion/ sion / ation / — are the positional variants of the same affix. They don’t differ in meaning or function but show a slight difference in sound form depending on the final phoneme of the preceding stem. They are considered as variants of one and the same morpheme and are called its allomorphs. Thus stems ending in consonants take as a rule – ation (dictate – dictation) but in pt – tion (corrupt – corruption, the final i becomes fused with the suffix ).
Allomorphs also occur among prefixes. Their form then depends on the initials of the word with which they assimilate.
e.g. in — before labials gives im: impossible, immediate
before r gives ir: irregular
before 1 — il: illegal
In all other cases and vowels it is in -: indirect, inability.
In American descriptive linguistics allomorphs are treated on a purely semantic basis, so that not only / Iz / in “dishes”, / z / in «dreams»; and / s / in “books” which are allomorphs in the sense explained above, but also formerly unrelated / en / in «oxen»; and zero suffix in «many sheep»; are considered to be allomorphs on the ground of the sameness of their grammatical meaning. This needs a serious re-thinking as within that kind of approach morphemes cease to be linguistic units combining the two fundamental aspects of form and meaning and become pure abstractions. The name «morpheme»-form turns into misnomer because all connection with form is lost.
As to their morphemic structure words are subdivided into monomorphic and polymorphic.
Monomorphic or root-words consist of only one root-morpheme.
e.g. dog, small, make, give, boy.
All polymorphic words fall into 2 subgroups: derived words and compound words.
Derived words are composed of one root-morpheme and one or more derivational morpheme: disagreeable, driver, notable, etc.
Compound words contain at least two root morphemes: school-master, blackboard, weekend, looking-glass, kind-hearted, good-natured etc.
Among compound words we distinguish compounds proper and derived compounds.
e.g. 1) to tip-toe, to white-wash, a fountain-pen
2) two-seater, week-ender, blue-eyed
The suffixes in these words refer to the whole compound, not to its last element.
Comparing the role each of these structural types of words plays in the language, we can easily perceive that they are not of equal importance. It was counted that derived words in different parts of speech comprise the largest part of the English vocabulary. But if we consider the frequency value of these words in actual speech, we shall see that root-words occupy a predominant place.
In English according to the recent frequency counts, about 60% of the total number of adjectives in current use are root-words that constitute the foundation and the backbone of the vocabulary and are of the paramount importance in speech. It should also be mentioned that root-words are characterized by a high-degree of collacability and they usually are polysemantic.
The specific features of the structure of English words depend on the grammar system (structure) of the language.
The root in English is very often homonymous with the word. The influence of the analytical structure of the language is obvious.
An English word does not necessarily contain formatives indicating to what part of speech it belongs. This holds true even with respect to inflective parts of speech, e.g. nouns, verbs, adjectives; change, talk, walk, rest, back — 5 parts of speech.
The number of affixes in English is far fewer than in Russian. We often see that lexical meanings expressed in Russian by means of affixation are rendered in English analytically:
людці — petty people
садочок — a little garden
домище – a big house
Важнейшие способы обработки и анализа рядов динамики Не во всех случаях эмпирические данные рядов динамики позволяют определить тенденцию изменения явления во времени… |
ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКАЯ МЕХАНИКА Статика является частью теоретической механики, изучающей условия, при которых тело находится под действием заданной системы сил… |
Теория усилителей. Схема Основная масса современных аналоговых и аналого-цифровых электронных устройств выполняется на специализированных микросхемах… |
Логические цифровые микросхемы Более сложные элементы цифровой схемотехники (триггеры, мультиплексоры, декодеры и т.д.) не имеют… |
1. Structure of English Words
2. Plan
• Morpheme as the important
component of word structure.
• Types of morphemes. Allomorphs.
• Types of affixes.
• Immediate Constituents Analysis.
3.
• The most important component of word
structure is the morpheme – the smallest
unit of language that carries information
about meaning or function.
• Builder → 2 morphemes: build (with
the meaning of “construct”) and -er
(which indicates that the entire word
functions as a noun with the meaning
“one who builds”).
• Houses → house (with the meaning of
“dwelling”) and -s (with the meaning of
“more than one”).
4. A word may consist of one, two or more morphemes:
• act, act-ive, act-iv-ate, re-act-iv-ate.
• Morphemes are the smallest indivisible twofacet language units. They are always used
as parts of words.
free (boy)
A free morpheme
coincides with the stem
or a word-form.
bound (-s)
A bound morpheme
occurs only as a
constituent part of a word.
• Affixes are bound morphemes.
5.
• Morphemes in various texts can have
different phonemic shapes.
• All the representatives of the given
morpheme are called allomorphs (from
Greek allos «other») of that morpheme.
• The morpheme used to express
indefiniteness in English, for instance, has
two forms – a before a word that begins with
a consonant (a car) and an before a word
that begins with a vowel (an accent).
• The variant forms of a morpheme are its
allomorphs.
6.
• Cats → /s/
• Dogs → /z/
• Judges → /iz/
Selection of the proper allomorph is dependent
on phonological facts.
• Assert → [ t ]
• Assertion → [ ∫ ]
• Permit – permiss-ive, electric – electricity,
impress – impress-ion.
An allomorph is a positional variant of that or
this morpheme occurring in a specific
environment.
7.
• Words can have two or more parts: a core
called a root and one or more parts added to
it and called affixes (something fixed or
attached to something else).
• The root is the morpheme that expresses the
lexical meaning of the word: teach – teacher
– teaching.
• Affixes are morphemes that modify the
meaning of the root.
• An affix added before the root is called a
prefix; an affix added after the root is called a
suffix.
8.
9.
A word may have one or more affixes of
either kind, or several of both kinds:
Prefix
Root
Suffix (es) Example
un-
work
-able
unworkable
fright
-en; -ing
frightening
re-
play
replay
10.
• A root constitutes the core of the word and
carries the major component of its meaning.
• To find the root, you have to remove any affix
there may be: the root -morph- (form)
remains after we remove the affixes a- and ous from amorphous.
• Roots have more specific and definite
meaning than prefixes or suffixes:
• -aqua- (water) in aquarium,
• -cent- (hundred) in centennial,
• -neo- (new) in neologism, etc.
11.
12.
Roots belong to a lexical category, such as
noun (N), verb (V), adjective (A), or
preposition (P).
• Nouns typically refer to concrete and abstract
things (door, intelligence);
• verbs tend to denote actions (stop, read);
• adjectives usually name properties (kind,
blue);
• prepositions encode spatial relations (in,
near).
Unlike roots, affixes do not belong to a lexical
category and are always bound morphemes:
• -er (a bound morpheme) combines with teach
(a verb), → a noun with the meaning «one
who teaches“.
13. A base (stem) is the form to which an affix is added
• In many cases, the base is also the
root: books.
• In other cases, however, the base can
be larger than a root: blackened. Black
is not only the root for the entire word
but also the base for -en. The unit
blacken, on the other hand, is simply
the base for -ed.
14. One should distinguish between suffixes and inflections.
One should distinguish between
suffixes and inflections.
Suffixes can form a new part of speech:
beauty — beautiful.
They can also change the meaning of
the root: black — blackish.
Inflections are morphemes used to
change grammar forms of the word:
work – works – worked – working.
English is not a highly inflected
language٭.
15.
16. Four structural types of words in English:
• simple (root) words consist of one root morpheme (&
an inflexion): boy, warm, law, tables, tenth;
• derived words consist of one root morpheme, one or
several affixes (& an inflexion): unmanageable,
lawful;
• compound words consist of two or more root
morphemes (& an inflexion): boyfriend, outlaws;
• compound-derived words consist of two or more
root morphemes, one or more affixes (& an inflexion):
left-handed, warm-hearted, blue-eyed.
17.
In conformity with structural types of
words we distinguish two main
types of word-formation:
• word-derivation (encouragement,
irresistible, worker) and
• word-composition (class board,
day-dream, weekend).
18. WORD FORMATION
W Derivation
Affixation
W Composition
Conversion
Derivational Composition
19. Immediate Constituents Analysis
• The theory of Immediate Constituents
(I.C.) was originally set forth by L.
Bloomfield as an attempt to
determine the ways in which lexical
units are related to one another.
• This kind of analysis is used in
lexicology mainly to discover the
derivational structure of lexical
units.
20.
21.
• Immediate constituents are any of the two
meaningful parts of a word.
• The main constituents are an affix and a stem.
• ungentlemanly – consists of a negative prefix
un- + an adjective stem.
• First we separate a free and a bound forms: un+ gentlemanly and gentleman + -ly.
• Then we break gentleman: gentle + man.
• At any level we obtain only two ICs, one of
which is a stem.
• The formula is: un + (gentle + man) + ly.
22.
• eatable consists of two ICs: eat + able
and may be described as a suffixal
derivative
• uneatable possesses a different
structure: the two ICs are un + eatable
which shows that this adjective is a
prefixal derivative.
• snow-covered = snow + covered
(a compound)
• blue-eyed = (blue + eye) + ed
(a suffixal derivative)
23.
• KEY TERMS:
• morpheme – the smallest bit of language that
has its own meaning, either a word or a part
of a word;
• free – (not in a fixed position or) not joined to
anything;
• bound – tied with;
• root (of a word) – is its most basic form, to
which other parts, such as affixes, can be
added;
• affix – a letter or group of letters which are
added to the beginning or end of a word to
make a new word.
24.
25. Key terms:
+ immediate constituents analysis