Test of word reading

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Test Of Word Reading Efficiency — Second Edition (TOWRE — 2)
Test of word reading efficiency second edition.jpg
Reading Test
First described by Joseph K Torgesen, Richard Wagner and Carl Rashotte
Purpose To test the reading accuracy and fluency on pronouncing printed words (Sight Word Efficiency) and Phonemically Regular Non-words (Phonemic Decoding Efficiency)

Test of Word Reading Efficiency Second Edition or commonly known as TOWRE — 2 is a kind of reading test developed to test the efficiency of reading ability of children from age 6–24 years. It generally seeks to measure an individual’s accuracy and fluency regarding two efficiencies; Sight Word Efficiency (SWE) and Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE). SWE measures ability of pronouncing words that are printed and PDE assesses the quantity of pronouncing phonemically regular non-words.[1] TOWRE — 2 is a very simple test which can be administered by teachers and aides, and it only takes five minutes to complete the procedure.[2] It is commonly used in reading research, classroom assessment and clinical practice.[3] This test is both straightforward and easy to use because it does not require a lot of materials (i.e. stopwatch, pencil, and stimulus cards) and can be administered by teachers and aides.[4]

History[edit]

Test Of Word Efficiency (TOWRE) was first developed and published by Joseph K Torgesen, Richard Wagner and Carl Rashotte in 1999.[1] After its popularity and acclamation,[3] its second revision version was published in 2012 which is known as Test of Word Efficiency second edition (TOWRE — 2).[4]

First publication of Test Of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE), 1999

In beginning, Torgesen et al. sampled 1507 children, adolescents and young adults from 30 US states to form the measurement of TOWRE. Their ages ranged from 6 to 24 years.[3] For TOWRE — 2, Torgesen et al. sampled 1,700 children ranging from 6–24 years old from 13 states of US. The TOWRE-2 mostly focused on students in elementary school (through grade 5) as this population was expected to have its widest use.[4]

There are few minor differences between TOWRE and TOWRE — 2. The first edition of TOWRE had two subtests (A and B), however this second edition has four subtests (A,B,C and D). According to the inventors of this tests, the additional tests will help to monitor the current condition of the students and how well their reading instructions are helping.[4]

Format[edit]

Generally, there are two formats of this test which helps to understand the reading accuracy of the children and their ability to do it fluently. The test uses regular and irregular words, common and less common words, vowel digraphs, and orthographic units.[2] The two sections that are used by TOWRE — 2 are:

Sight Word Efficiency (SWE)[edit]

It uses vertically printed singlet list of 104 words from one to four syllables. The individual is given 45 seconds to pronounce as many of the words as they can from the list.[5] The level of difficulty gradually increases from single syllables to multi-syllables and the administer measures how well the individual is pronouncing and how fast.[6] This process of reading real words in 45 seconds helps to measure the capability of an individual to pronounce single sight words.[4]

TOWRE 2 booklet and its subtests Sight Word Efficiency (SWE) and Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE)

Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE)[edit]

This subtest is more about measuring the ability of children to recognise unfamiliar words, pseudo-words or non-words. It uses 63 pseudo-words of one to three syllables and measures the children’s efficiency of reading these words. The scores on this subtests helps researchers to understand the enthusiasm of students’ to learn independent reading and spelling skills. It generally starts with non-words that have less syllables and less difficult and gradually increase in both syllables and difficulty.[4]

The combined scores of these two subtests helps researchers to administer the reading abilities or disabilities of the participants. The scores in one or both of these subtests helps to diagnose the reading problems.[4]

Materials Required[edit]

This test (TOWRE 2) is a highly simplified test which means that it does not require a lot of or classified materials. According to the test booklet, it only requires simple materials like pen/pencil, stopwatch and stimulus card (which is already inside the booklet) to start the test.[4] To dissect the result and formulate the outcome, the examiner will be using examiner’s manual which has scoring instructions for all the tests.[4] The book reviews claims that TOWRE 2 is used by educators, school psychologists, speech pathologists, teachers, teacher’s aid and researchers.[4]

Uses of TOWRE — 2[edit]

TOWRE — 2 can be categorised as multipurpose test as it has been used in several variety of researches and used by different category of people, such as teachers, educational researchers, physicians, speech pathologists and school psychologists. However, we can observe three main uses of TOWRE — 2 which are as follows:

Early Identification[edit]

TOWRE — 2 is a screening test which is assumed to take less than 5 minutes to be administered and get the results. Thus it is presumed to be the easiest way to test students and learn their ability to recognise the reading fluency and accuracy from the very early age.[2] Researchers believe that morphological awareness, i.e. ability to identify the structures of the words, develop from as early as 4 years old.[7] Thus, researchers have used TOWRE — 2 to identify morphological awareness in children, and also other reading abilities like reading comprehensions and passage reading efficiency.[2][3][6][7] Teachers have used this test to help diagnose the children who are not benefitting from the reading instructions they are receiving.[1]

Diagnosis of Learning disabilities[edit]

TOWRE — 2 has widely been used by researchers and teachers to examine learning disabilities in children from age 6–24 years and especially the children from elementary school. It is also used in place of standard diagnostic test of phonetic non-word reading ability, which is mostly used to diagnose learning disabilities like dyslexia.[1] When older children and accomplished young children are slow in orally reciting texts, the individual is considered to have learning disability and is referred to correct specialists. Physicians use TOWRE — 2 and similar other tests such as CTOPP (Comprehensive Test Of Phonological Processing) and Woodcock Reading Mastery Test, in the clinical setting because children do not need to bring their text book and can still have materials for the diagnosis.[8]

Researches[edit]

TOWRE was first published in 1999. However, after its publication it has been used numerous times in researches related to language, education and learning disabilities.[1] Just like its predecessor, TOWRE — 2, the second edition of TOWRE which was published in 2012, has been used by researchers, teachers and physicians.[3] TOWRE — 2 has mostly been used to measure the correlation between reading fluency and reading comprehension.[6]

Scaled Scores and Percentile[edit]

Age equivalent, grade equivalent, percentile marks and scaled scores are four of the normative scores of TOWRE — 2, however, the authors recommend to use percentile marks and scaled scores to interpret test results rather than age and grade equivalent. The two subtests, Sight Word Efficiency (SWE) and Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE), and the TWRE index score have mean of 100 and the standard deviation of 15. TWRE index integrate performances of both subtests, which is the reason why it is the most reliable test score.[4]

TOWRE — 2 in United States[edit]

The test was first researched and administered in United States by Torgesen, Wagner and Rashotte in 1999.[4] School children from 30 states in 1999 and 13 states including Washington DC in 2012 (the second edition of TOWRE) were administered the test to research the use, challenges and outcome of the test.[4] In the present, TOWRE — 2 is widely used in school setting and clinical assessments to test the learning disabilities and oral difficulties in children.[9]

TOWRE -2 in Australia[edit]

Even though most of the children have the ability to fluently read and comprehend what is taught in the school, there are significant number of children who have difficulty to read fluently and accurately.[9] Australian Bureau of Statistics found that there are 52% of children from age 6-19 years who have difficulty achieving a score that is deemed average for everyday work literacy.[9] Researchers have used TOWRE — 2 in Australia to test the level of competency in children concerning reading accuracy and comprehension, and also to test the reason behind polarised achievement in children in the context of reading abilities.[9][2] According to PISA 2000 (Program for International Student Assessment; OECD, 2002), in Australia, there are more than 40% of children who are strong readers and more than 30% of children who are weak readers.[2]

Tests Similar To TOWRE 2[edit]

TOWRE 2 uses phonological non-words and simple to difficult syllabus words in order to detect any learning disabilities or just to find out how much the learning materials provided in the classroom are being effective.[1][2] It has been known to be used by teachers and health professionals in different sectors.[4] However, there are other tests which are similar to TOWRE 2 and has been used to assess the reading fluency and accuracy in children from age 6-24 years. Some of which are:

Comprehensive Test Of Phonological Processing Second Edition (CTOPP — 2)[edit]

CTOPP — 2 is a test which is administered to children as young as 5 years old to children at the age of 24 years. This test uses phonological words to assess the phonological ability of children and how well they are doing in comparison to their peers.[10] This test compromises of phonological awareness, phonological memory and rapid reading.[10]

Gray Oral Reading Test Fourth Edition (GORT — 4)[edit]

There are a lot of reading test related to children, however, there are only few which administer the reading fluency and accuracy of adults. Thus GORT — 4 is a test which is used to assess the reading abilities of adults who have reading difficulty or learning disabilities.[11] This test has two form; Form A and Form B, which compromises of passages.[12] The examiner is required to administer the result by assessing how well the participant reads the passage.[11]

Woodcock Johnson Third Edition (WJIII)[edit]

WJIII is mostly used to administer cognitive abilities, reading achievements and oral language use in both children and adults. This test has three subtests which are Form A (Letter Word Identification), Form B (Passage Comprehension) and Form C (Word Attack).[13] These three subtests can be either jointly used or used separately.[13]

The Slosson Phonics and Structural Analysis Test (SP-SAT)[edit]

SP-SAT is mostly used to assess structural writing skill and phonetic awareness in children from age 6 to 9 years.[13] This test has 100 items which is used to analyse the results in 10-15 minutes. Even though this test is easy to use and takes minimum time, it can only be administered by teachers and educators after specialised training.[13]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f «Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) | Pearson Assessment». www.pearsonclinical.co.uk. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Knight, Bruce Allen; Galletly, Susan A. (2006-01-01). «The Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) used in an Australian context». Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities. 11 (3): 139–145. doi:10.1080/19404150609546817. ISSN 1324-8928. S2CID 54724802.
  3. ^ a b c d e Marinus, Eva; Kohnen, Saskia; McArthur, Genevieve (2013-11-01). «Australian comparison data for the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE)». Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties. 18 (2): 199–212. doi:10.1080/19404158.2013.852981. ISSN 1940-4158. S2CID 143102366.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Tarar, Jessica M.; Meisinger, Elizabeth B.; Dickens, Rachel H. (2015). «Test Review: Test of Word Reading Efficiency–Second Edition (TOWRE-2) by Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A.». Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 30 (4): 320–326. doi:10.1177/0829573515594334. ISSN 0829-5735. S2CID 147475481.
  5. ^ Ouellette, Gene; Beers, Ashley (2010-02-01). «A not-so-simple view of reading: how oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story». Reading and Writing. 23 (2): 189–208. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1. ISSN 1573-0905. S2CID 144522375.
  6. ^ a b c Kim, Young-Suk; Wagner, Richard K.; Lopez, Danielle (2012). «Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2». Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 113 (1): 93–111. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.03.002. ISSN 0022-0965. PMC 3836363. PMID 22726256.
  7. ^ a b Kirby, John R.; Deacon, S. Hélène; Bowers, Peter N.; Izenberg, Leah; Wade-Woolley, Lesly; Parrila, Rauno (2011-03-25). «Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability». Reading and Writing. 25 (2): 389–410. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.462.1594. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5. ISSN 0922-4777. S2CID 254986910.
  8. ^ Shaywitz, S. E.; Shaywitz, B. A. (2003-05-01). «Dyslexia (Specific Reading Disability)». Pediatrics in Review. 24 (5): 147–153. doi:10.1542/pir.24-5-147. ISSN 0191-9601. PMID 12728187.
  9. ^ a b c d Nayton, Mandy; Hettrich, Emma Leah; Samar, Stephanie; Wilkinson, Camelia (2017), «Evidence-Based Assessment and Interventions for Problems with Reading in School Psychology», Handbook of Australian School Psychology, Springer International Publishing, pp. 173–195, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_9, ISBN 9783319451640
  10. ^ a b Dickens, Rachel H. Meisinger, Elizabeth B. Tarar, Jessica M. Test Review: Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing–2nd ed. (CTOPP-2) by Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. OCLC 1052019137.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ a b Greenberg, Daphne; Pae, Hye Kyeong; Morris, Robin D.; Calhoon, Mary Beth; Nanda, Alice O. (2009-07-21). «Measuring adult literacy students’ reading skills using the Gray Oral Reading Test». Annals of Dyslexia. 59 (2): 133–149. doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0027-8. ISSN 0736-9387. PMC 2794989. PMID 19629705.
  12. ^ «GORT5 Gray Oral Reading TestsFifth Edition Complete Kit». www.proedinc.com. Retrieved 2019-05-30.
  13. ^ a b c d Erford, Bradley T.; Dutton, Jessica L. (2005). «Technical Analysis of the Slosson Phonics and Structural Analysis Test». Educational and Psychological Measurement. 65 (6): 1011–1025. doi:10.1177/0013164405275665. ISSN 0013-1644. S2CID 145122461.

Reading comprehension test

English Reading Comprehension Tests

Reading comprehension is also an important part of an English test. A reading comprehension test can help you improve your vocabulary, grammar, and logical thinking abilities. There are some tips for you to improve your reading skills:

Tips for English reading comprehension tests

— Practice reading every day. You should read different topics to improve your vocabulary.

— Make a note of any new words you come across and learn them.

— Try to answer all the questions.

— After you’ve answered all of the questions, check the key and read the passage again to find out the mistake you made and to deeply understand the passage you have read.

Reading techniques

Reading techniques include: scanningskimming, intensive reading, and extensive reading.

Scanning: You try to find a particular piece of information. You read from top to down of the text quickly to find the specific information you need to answer questions.

+ Skimming: You try to gather the most important information as quickly as possible. You read from top to bottom of the text quickly and note important information.

+ Intensive reading: You try to find the details of a specific information. Example question: What does «intensive» in line 5 mean?

+ Extensive reading: You try to find general information of a passage. Example question: What is the best title for this passage?

English Reading Comprehension Tests Categories

 Reading tests are divided into categories below:

I. Multi-choice Tests

  1. Elementary Reading — Multi-choice
  2. Pre-Inter Reading — Multi-choice
  3. Intermediate Reading — Multi-choice
  4. Advanced Reading — Multi-choice
  5. TOEFL iBT Reading — New question format updated 
  6. Reading by Topics 
    1. Animals
    2. Colors
    3. Drinks
    4. Economics
    5. Flowers
    6. Foods
    7. Fruits
    8. Herbs and Spices
    9. Planets
    10. Sports
    11. Vegetables
    12. Vehicles

II. True or False Tests

  1. Elementary Reading — True or False

  2. Pre-Intermediate Reading — True or False

  3. Intermediate Reading — True or False

III. Read and Fill in the blanks — Drop-list

  1. Pre-Intermediate level

  2. Intermediate level

IV. For Grade 6 — 12

  1. Grade 6 — Reading — True False

  2. Grade 6 — Reading — Multi-choice

  3. Grade 6 — Reading — Matching

  4. Grade 7 — Reading — True False

  5. Grade 7 — Reading — Multi-choice

  6. Grade 7 — Reading — Matching

  7. Grade 8 — Reading — True False

  8. Grade 8 — Reading — Multi-choice

  9. Grade 8 — Reading — Matching

  10. Grade 9 — Reading — Multi-choice

  11. Grade 10 — Reading — Multi-choice

  12. Grade 11 — Reading — Multi-choice

  13. Grade 12 — Reading — Multi-choice

About The Reading Test

  • Read the text, then try to answer the questions.
  • There are 20 questions, and you see one at a time in a random order. The answers are not in the same order as the text.
  • Some questions are easier; some are more difficult. Don’t worry if you don’t know the answer!
  • Try not to use a dictionary – the idea is to find your natural level.
Sarah’s Life in Canada

Sarah is 36 years old, and she lives in Canada. She has two young daughters. She works two days a week as a teacher. Her husband’s name is Nathan, and he’s a sales manager. Nathan’s job is very busy, so he often comes home late. At weekends, they often go driving or walking in the countryside.

Nathan was born in Canada, but Sarah wasn’t. She was born in Argentina, and she moved to Canada when she was 26. When she was growing up, she was really interested in English. At first, she thought it was difficult, but when she finished school, she could already speak quite fluently and understand almost everything she heard or read. She spent a lot of time listening to songs and watching TV shows and films in English.

After she graduated from university, she decided to train as an English teacher. The certificate she needed was quite expensive, and competition for places was intense, but she was determined to do it—she simply couldn’t imagine doing anything else. She finished the course with a distinction, which was the highest grade possible. Soon, she found work as a teaching assistant in a local primary school. She enjoyed the work, although it was often challenging—the children were not always well-disciplined, and she didn’t think that the classroom teacher had enough understanding of teaching methods.

When she first went to Canada, she never would have imagined that she would end up staying there. It was supposed to be a short-term placement in a high school. She thought that she would be able to see a different part of the world and gain some useful experience, which could help her to find a better teaching position when she came back to Argentina. At first, she found living overseas much more difficult than she had expected. She felt homesick, and she had problems getting used to everything which was different in Canada—the interpersonal culture, the climate, the food… For the first three months she was there, she spent most of her free time in her room, dreaming of going back to Argentina and seeing her family again.

Over time, she adjusted to life in Canada, and even started to enjoy herself a bit more. One day, she met Nathan at a party. She liked his sense of humour, and how kind he was, but she was reluctant to get involved, knowing that she was planning to leave in the near future. When her placement finished, he convinced her to apply for a permanent job in another school. She told herself that she would give it one more year and see how things went.

Now, Sarah is settled, although she still misses Argentina. She tries to make it back at least yearly, and she is bringing up her daughters to be bilingual, so that they can talk to their Argentinian relatives in Spanish. When she thinks back to her first few months in Canada, she can scarcely recognise herself. In some ways, she wishes she weren’t so far away from her family, but at the same time, she feels that she’s learned many things which she never would have experienced had she stayed in Argentina. She wants to give her daughters the chance to travel and experience life in other countries as soon as she can, although of course she hopes they don’t move too far away!

What Next?

Now you’ve found your level with this reading level test, why not try a class to get advice from one of our Oxford Online English teachers?

Book your first class for just 5.99 EUR!

During your class, we’ll talk to you about what you need
You can make payments and book classes through the website
Start studying!

Get Started

Other Level Tests

Listening Level Test

Vocabulary Level Test

Grammar Level Test

— multiple choice —

World Book Day – the test teen reads

A Memorable Experience

La Mercè Festival

Teenagers and parents – it’s the same old story

Survival adventure camp

Hotels of the future

A varied career

The fake hairdresser remembers

Moving house

The reluctant hero

A hop, skip and a jump away

Trip to Scotland

My fastest ever plane ride

Wildlife cameraman

Night flight

Cycling Home from Siberia

Pen Hadow – polar explorer

An extract from a novel

Distance learning

A lot can happen in a year abroad

An extract from a novel 2

The actor Daniel Radcliffe

— gapped text —

Open-air teaching In Germany

Sneakers

Giving advice

How to write a good blog

Making mountaineering history

Taking part in the Young Businessperson scheme

In defence of women’s boxing

Go skating in Sweden this winter

Going up in a glider

I run up mountains

The airport photographer

Would you turn off your engine, please?

Paddle power

I’m the last speaker of my language

College students need their sleep!

Just because I’ve been on holiday doesn’t mean I have to be happy

Puffins in peril

Inline Skating

Has one of the mysteries of the ancient pyramids been solved?

Working as a TV news producer

The ultimate green home: the WWF’s new headquarters

Can we control our dreams?

Have we lost the ability to focus on a single task?

— multiple matching —

Four teenage business stars

Lessons for life

Reviews of famous autobiographers who wrote about being teenagers

Dream jobs

TV documentaries

Teenage success stories

Advertising in public places

A good walk

Starting your own business

What’s the best advice your father ever gave you?

I love my bike

Future-Friendly Awards

Solo travel in Australia

For the record

Adventure guides

Four books about sleep

The Marshmallow Test

Canaletto and Venice

Friends again

Living with tourism

My new bicycle

My university

Four of the world’s best beaches

Jessica Ennis: heptathlon Olympic champion

Reading Fluency Assessment

Test Your Reading Speed and Fluency

This free reading speed test will help you understand how your student’s reading speed and accuracy compare to other students in their grade level.

  • Directions
  • Materials
  • Assessment
  • Fluency Training
  • Download Free Reading Drill
  • Summer Reading Program 2023
Online Summer Reading Program 2023

Directions Reading Speed Test (WPM)

Follow the steps below to test your child’s reading speed, fluency, and words-per-minute (wpm).

  1. Estimate the reading level of your student
    Do they seem to be at reading grade level, below grade level, or above grade level? If the test reading passage is frustrating, the level is too high.
  2. Print out the student and instructor reading passages
    • Your student will use the student version.
    • As a parent, teacher, tutor, or instructor, use the instructor version of the reading passage. The instructor copy has word counts on the right-hand side to make it easy to count the number of words read after the timed reading.
  3. Time your student for one minute while they read the passage aloud
    • Follow along with your printed instructor version. Mark any mistakes discreetly. You can tilt your paper up so that your student will not see you make any marks. If your student sees you react as they are reading, it will distract them and could give inaccurate results.
  4. Calculate the total number of words per minute your student reads and the total mistakes/errors
    Mistakes/errors are:
    • Mispronunciation or dropped endings
    • Skipped words (Skipped lines count as one mistake)
    • Omissions
    • Substitutions
    • Repeated words
    • Inserting words that are not there
    • Self-corrections
  5. If your child makes more mistakes or errors than marked below, you will want to try the level below the one you selected
    • 1st through 4th grade: 5 mistakes/errors
    • 5th through 8th grade: 6 mistakes/errors

Online Summer Reading Program 2023


Materials Reading Fluency Passages For Grades 1-8


Assessment After the Reading Speed and Fluency Test

Assess your child’s reading speed by comparing current reading speed rates (words-per-minute) by grade level. The chart below includes average reading fluency rates.

1st Grade (Spring) 53 – 111 wpm
2nd Grade (Spring) 89 – 149 wpm
3rd Grade (Spring) 107 – 162 wpm
4th Grade (Spring)  123 – 180 wpm
5h Grade (Spring) 139 – 194 wpm
6th-8th Grade (Spring) 150 – 204 wpm
Hasbrouck, J. & Tindal, G. (2017)

Remember, there is no good or bad result. We expect kids to make mistakes. You may want to repeat the test with reading levels above and below to see if there are any major differences in the number of words read per minute and the number of mistakes or errors made.

Enrollment is Now Open:
Summer Reading Program 2023

We have the perfect step-by-step program to help you improve your child’s average reading speed and comprehension this summer!

Includes: reading speed training, comprehension strategies, read-aloud selections, card games, puzzles, video spelling and phonics lessons, and more.

  • 6-Week, 8-Week, or 10-Week Program
  • 45-60 Minutes a Day
  • Self-Paced, Online, and Offline Activities

Learn More about the Summer Reading Program

Reserve Your Spot


How You Can Improve Your Reading Speed

Reading Fluency Training

Reading fluency drills are one of the best activities you can do to improve your reading fluency. With our custom-designed, phonetic-based drills, you work on improving the underlying brain processes of reading. When you do these drills, you target five areas of visual processing, six areas of auditory processing, and two areas of tactile-kinesthetic processing. This process also strengthens phonemic awareness and phonics skills at the same time. We do this in just 5-minutes a day and 3-5 days a week.

Student Doing a Reading Speed Test Fluency Training Drill

Scholar Within’s summer reading program has these reading fluency training drills built-in. This training has been custom designed to improve your eye-tracking skills and speed up your visual processing skills.

Online Summer Reading Program 2023

Download Free Reading Drill

Download the first drill of our custom-designed reading fluency training. The first sets of words have extra space between the letters, highlighting or emphasizing the letter or letter combination being studied. In our program, the drills are organized according to phonic rules and letter combinations that are used in reading. Each drill builds upon prior drills, providing continual review and mastery of all concepts.

› Download the Free Reading Drill

Reading Fluency Training

Download Free Reading Drill

More Reading Help

Students are still behind nationwide because of COVID. Summer is right around the corner, and for many students, that means they’ll lose much of the gains they have made this past year.

52% of students typically lose an average of 39% of their total school year learning gains over the summer (American Education Research Journal, 2020). This study was done over five summers with grades 1 through 6. The study included 18 million students in 7,500 school districts.

The good news is that you are not alone if your child is struggling. Summer is the perfect time to take your child’s education into your own hands. With Scholar Within’s Summer Reading Program, you can not only fill in the gaps where your child may be struggling, like with their reading fluency, but they’ll also learn critical new skills like note-taking and reading comprehension strategies.

Learn more

5 Star Reviews

“My son and I have tried many reading programs; this one has made the most significant difference. It trains the brain to think of reading and spelling in ways beyond rote memorization. In addition, the reading program is enjoyable and effective. As a result, my son started the school year with increased confidence as a reader, and I feel better prepared to help him with his learning.”

Kelley B.

Summer Reading Program 2023

Online Summer Reading Program 2023

Research Supports Reading Fluency

Students who read slowly typically have difficulty sounding out words, focusing, and attending to reading content. As a result, both their comprehension and writing skills are impacted.

Multiple studies by Palmer, Bashir, and Hook found a strong positive correlation between reading fluency, reading comprehension, and writing skills.

If a reader does not recognize words quickly enough, the meaning will be lost.

Reid Lyon, Ph.D., stated in 1997, “While the ability to read words accurately is a necessary skill in learning to read, the speed at which this is done becomes a critical factor in ensuring that children understand what they read. As one child recently remarked, ‘If you don’t ride a bike fast enough, you fall off.’ Likewise, if the reader does not recognize words quickly enough, the meaning will be lost… If the reading of the words on the page is slow and labored, the reader simply cannot remember what he or she has read, much less relate the ideas they have read about to their own background knowledge.”

A 2017 study by Taylor, Davis, and Rastle showed that learning to read by sounding out words (phonics) has a dramatic impact on both the accuracy of reading aloud and on comprehension. Researchers tested whether learning to read by sounding out words is more effective than focusing on whole-word meanings. Their results suggest that early literacy should focus on phonics (letters-to-sounds) rather than on teaching sight-word strategies (whole language approach).

What is your child’s reading level?

Select a grade level to learn more about each individualized program:

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Test my word per minute
  • Test module 6 spotlight 6 fill in the correct word board
  • Test microsoft office word
  • Test match the words and translate the word combinations into russian
  • Test make up word combinations difficult