Night word of god

How blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked,
Nor stand in the path of sinners,
Nor sit in the seat of scoffers!
2 But his delight is in the law of the LORD,
And in His law he meditates day and night.
3 He will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water,
Which yields its fruit in its season
And its leaf does not wither;
And in whatever he does, he prospers.
4 The wicked are not so,
But they are like chaff which the wind drives away.
5 Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment,
Nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous.
6 For the LORD knows the way of the righteous,
But the way of the wicked will perish.

If this is Prayer Week, why do we begin with a message on Psalm 1 that doesn’t mention prayer, and focus our attention on the Word of God and not prayer? The central point of this psalm is made in
verse 2: «But his delight is in the law of the LORD, and in His law he meditates day and night.» The person who delights in God’s law so much that he meditates on it day and night is delivered from the ways of the wicked and sinners and scoffers, and is made fruitful and durable and prosperous. That’s the point. Delighting in the law of God is the central issue. So why begin Prayer Week with this psalm and this focus on delighting in the law of God?

Well, where is this psalm? It is the beginning of the book of Psalms. And what are the psalms? Many of them are prayers. In fact, the Psalter is the prayer book of the Bible. Millions of Christians go to the Psalms to find words for the cry of their hearts in the worst of times and the best of times. So I begin Prayer Week with Psalm 1 because the Bible begins its prayer book with Psalm 1.

But why does it? And why should we? The reason is that in the Christian life -in the life of God’s people — prayer and the Word are connected in such a way that if you disconnect them, both die. Let me sum up the connection between prayer and the Word in three ways. The Word of God inspires prayer, it informs prayer and it incarnates prayer. Just a word of explanation on each of these.

Connection Between the Word and Prayer

The Word of God inspires prayer. This means that the Word commands us to pray, and makes promises to us of what God will do if we pray, and tells us stories of great men and women of prayer. James 5:16-18 does all three. First, «Pray for one another so that you may be healed.» There’s a command from the Word. Second, «The effective prayer of a righteous man can accomplish much.» There is the encouraging promise. Third, «Elijah was a man with a nature
like ours, and he prayed earnestly that it would not rain, and it did not rain on the earth for three years and six months.» There’s a story to inspire us. So the Word inspires prayer by telling us to
do it (like a doctor telling us what’s good for us) and promising us good things if we will do it, and telling us stories to encourage us in our weakness.

Second, the Word of God informs prayer. This means that the Word tells us what to pray and becomes itself the content of our prayer. When you know the mind of God in his Word, you pray the mind of God in your prayers. For example, in Acts 4:24-26, the early church prayed like this: «They lifted their voices to God with one accord and said, «O Lord, it is You who made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and all that is in them [see Exodus 20:11], who by the Holy Spirit, through the mouth of our father David your servant, said [quoting Psalm 2], ‘Why did the Gentiles rage, and the peoples devise futile things? The kings of the earth took their stand, and
the rulers were gathered together against the Lord and against his Christ.'» This is the way powerful saints have prayed throughout history. O may the Lord fill our payers with the great purposes and promises of God that we learn from his Word. The Word informs
prayer.

Third, the Word incarnates prayer. This means that prayers are often invisible and concealed in the soul and in the closet and in the church. But their effect is to be in the open in the lives of other people and among the nations. How does that happen? God
usually advances his purposes in world evangelization and personal transformation and cultural reformation by direct encounters with the truth of his Word. The Word incarnates our prayers. Prayers become effective through the truth getting into people’s ears and minds and hearts.

People don’t just start believing on Jesus because you pray for them. They need to hear about Jesus. «How will they believe in Him whom they have not heard? And how will they hear without a preacher?» (Romans 10:14). «Pray for us that the Word of the Lord will spread rapidly and be glorified, just as it did also with you» (2 Thessalonians 3:1). Prayer empowers the Word and the Word incarnates prayer. Saints don’t just become more holy because someone prays that they will. They need to see the truth: «Sanctify them in the truth. Thy Word is truth» (John 17:17). Cultural slavery to injustice and greed and dishonesty and sexual immorality does not just change because we pray for it. The agent of reformation is the truth: «You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free» (John 8:32). Prayer must be incarnated in declarations and demonstrations of the truth.

That’s probably enough to explain why we begin Prayer Week with a text on the Word of God. The Word inspires, informs and incarnates prayer. They go together, because Word and Spirit go together. Word without Spirit is intellectualism. Spirit without Word is emotionalism at best, and probably syncretism. But the Word and the Spirit are kept together when we depend on the Spirit for help in all our dealing with the Word, and express that dependence
in prayer.

The Blessing of Delighting in God’s Word

Now let’s consider Psalm 1 and focus on delighting in and meditating on the Word of God. First, let’s think about the blessing that comes from delighting in and meditating on the Word
day and night. The Psalm begins, «How blessed is the man. . .» So you are drawn in right away: do you want blessing in your life? The word means «happy» in the rich, full sense of happiness rooted in moral and mental and physical wellbeing.

But now who is this happy person? The one who does not do something and the one who does do something. The happy person does not «walk in the counsel of the wicked, nor stand in the path of sinners, nor sit in the seat of scoffers!» (verse 1). But what does the happy person do? Verse 2: «But his delight is in the law of the LORD, and in His law he meditates day and night.» So, instead of finding his pleasures in the words or the ways or the fellowship of the wicked, the one who is truly happy finds pleasure in meditating on the Word and the ways of God. («Law,» Torah, = instruction: God’s Words about God’s ways.)

Now the point of the psalm is to say that when you experience the Word of God like that — as so delightful and so satisfying that it captures your mind and heart day and night and weans you away from the counsel and path and seat of the world -when you experience the Word like that, you are blessed. You are happy.

The Person Who Delights in the Word of God

Then, in verse 3, it gives us three illustrations of that happiness. The first one is that the person who delights in the Word of God and meditates on it day and night will be «like a tree
firmly planted by streams of water which yields its fruit in its season.» The second one is that the person who delights in the Word of God and meditates on it day and night will be like a tree whose «leaf does not wither.» And the third is that the person who delights in the Word of God and meditates on it day and night «will prosper in all that he does.»

Let’s think about each of these for a moment.

1. Fruitful

If you delight in the Word of God and meditate on it day and night you will yield your fruit in season. You will be a fruitful person. O for more fruitful people! You know them. They are
refreshing and nourishing to be around. You go away from them fed. You go away strengthened. You go away with your taste for spiritual things awakened. Their mouth is a fountain of life. Their words are healing and convicting and encouraging and deepening and enlightening. Being around them is like a meal. This is the effect of delighting in the Word of God and meditating on it day and night. You will yield fruit in season.

2. Durable

The second illustration of your blessing if you delight in the Word of God and meditate on it day and night is that your leaf does not wither. The point here is that the hot winds are blowing and the rain is not falling and all the other trees that are not planted by streams are withering and dying, but in spite of all the heat and drought, your leaf remains green, because delighting in
the Word of God and meditating on it day and night is like being planted by a stream. The happiness of this person is durable. It is deep. It does not depend on which way the wind is blowing or whether the rain is falling. It gets its life from an absolutely changeless source: God in his Word.

The person who delights in the Word of God and meditates on it day and night speaks like the prophet in Habakkuk 3:17-18: «Though the fig tree do not blossom, nor fruit be on the vines, the produce of the olive fail and the fields yield no food, the flock be cut off from the fold and there be no herd in the stalls, yet I will exult in the LORD, I will rejoice in the God of my salvation.»

(A Thought on Y2K)

This might be a place to say a word about the Y2K scare. Do you want a prophetic word about Y2K? I have two prophetic words about Y2K. First, the greatest need on January 1, 2000, will not be basements stocked with food and water and generators, but hearts stocked with the Word of God. You will be fruitful, you will flourish, you will be life-giving not by seeking the very things the world seeks (Matthew 6:32), but by delighting in the Word of God and meditating on it day and night. What the world will need and does need from the church is the Word of God that fits us to say, «Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? . .. In all these things we are more than
conquerors through him who loved us» (Romans 8:35-37).

The other prophetic word about Y2K is this: Nothing is going to happen on January 1, 2000, nothing, that is as bad as what is already happening to persecuted and starving Christians in Sudan. Or to the staggering number of orphans in Malawi and other AIDS-devastated countries of Africa. Or to survivors in Honduras and Nicaragua. Or to lonely, dying old people in dozens of skilled care centers around the Twin Cities who have outlived their families. There is something that smells of hypocrisy in the talk about stockpiling supplies in our homes to «minister» to others in the coming Y2K crisis when there are more places to minister this very day that are worse crises than anything that is going to happen a year from now. Y2K will happen to someone every day in 1999 — many of them within your reach.* Delight yourself in the Word of God, meditate on it day and night, and then take the fruit of your life and go minister to the lost and the hungry and the thirsty that are already so many. Then you won’t even notice when Y2K happens.

3. Prospering (Really?)

3. But now that leads to the question raised by the third illustration of blessing and happiness in verse 3. «And in whatever he does, he prospers.» Really? What does this mean? Does it mean that, if you delight in the Word of God and meditate enough, your business will make a big profit and your health will always be good and there will be no food shortages or car accidents or violence against your house?

Well, there are some reasons to believe that such a person will have some of those blessings. For example, when you delight in God’s Word instead of walking in the counsel of the wicked and standing in the way of sinners and sitting in the seat of scoffers, you will be doing the kinds of things that God approves of, and he is likely to bless what he approves. And when you are delighting in the Word of God, you are trusting it, and we know God works for those who trust him and wait for him (Isaiah 64:4; 2 Chronicles 16:9).

But there are reasons to believe that God does not always spare his most faithful people. There are many passages of Scripture that tell us «many are the afflictions of the righteous» (Psalm 34:19; cf. Acts 14:22). Psalm 73 expresses the reality that often the righteous suffer and the wicked prosper. The answer of that Psalm and this one is: Behold what becomes of them in the end (Psalm 73:17).

Psalm 1 says, «The wicked are not so, but they are like chaff which the wind drives away. Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous. For the LORD knows the way of the righteous, but the way of the wicked will
perish» (verses 4-5). When this Psalm ponders the value of being wicked or of delighting in the Word of God, it measures the value finally by what happens at the judgment. There may be some prosperity in this life for the wicked, but in the end they will be swept away like chaff, but those who have delighted in the Word of God will go on flourishing because God sets his eye and favor on them. He «knows» their way.

So the blessing, the happiness, referred to in verse 1 is a life that is nourishing and fruitful for others, a life that is deeply durable in the face of drought and a life whose «labor is not in
vain» (1 Corinthians 15:58), but succeeds in God’s good purposes into eternity. That’s the blessing of delighting in the Word of God and meditating on it day and night.

What Is Meditation?

Now what does this meditation involve? The word «meditation» in Hebrew means basically to speak or to mutter. When this is done in the heart it is called musing or meditation. So meditating on the Word of God day and night means to speak to yourself the Word of God day and night and to speak to yourself about it.

Here is where I plead with you to get involved in the Fighter Verse memory program or some other pattern of Bible memorization. Unless you memorize Scripture you will not meditate on it day and night. But O the benefits and delights of knowing communion with God hour by hour in his Word. If you have ever wondered, What is hour-by-hour walking in fellowship with the living God? the answer is: it is his speaking to you by his Word through your memory and meditation and illumination and application and your speaking to him words of thanks and praise and admiration and desire and seeking for help and guidance and understanding. The Word is the
basis for your hearing him and for his hearing you. The depth and solidity and certainty of your walk with God and your communion with God will rise and fall with whether God’s own written Word is the warp and woof of the fabric of your fellowship.

Let me just give you an example of how this works in my own life. As I was coming to the end of the year and reading the final pages of the Old Testament in the Minor Prophets, I was moved by Micah 7:18. It is the foundation of a favorite hymn of mine, «Who Is a Pardoning God Like Thee?» by Samuel Davies. So I memorized it and carried it around on the front burner of my mind for several days. It says, «Who is a God like thee, pardoning iniquity and passing over transgression for the remnant of his inheritance? He does not retain his anger forever because he delights in steadfast love.»

One of the insights that I discovered and tasted with tremendous pleasure was that God does choose to be angry, but his anger is limited. Why? Because he «delights in steadfast love.» This means that anger is not God’s favorite emotion. He «delights» in love. This has huge implications — practical ones -about my life and my own anger and love as I rest in him. And theological ones, as I ponder the levels of willing in God: willing to be angry in his holiness at sin, and yet not delighting to be angry the way he delights to show steadfast love. I was fed by this text for several days before I moved on to another front-burner text.

So I urge you to memorize Scripture, and meditate on it day and night. It will change your life in many good ways.

What if Meditation and Prayer are Drudgery?

Finally, we must ask about this delight. The deepest mark of this happy person in Psalm 1 is that he delights in the Word of God (verse 2). Bible reading and Bible memory and meditation are not a burden to him, but a pleasure. This is what we want. What a sadness when Bible reading is just a drudgery. Something is wrong.

What shall we do? Well, we will say more next week, but let’s close considering this. We struggle with Bible reading and memory and meditation because we don’t find pleasure in it. We have other things we want to get to more. TV or breakfast or work or newspaper or computer. Our hearts incline to other things and do not incline to the Word. And so it is not a delight.

Did the psalmists ever struggle with this? Yes they did. Take heart. We all do. How shall this be changed? This is Prayer Week, and so the answer we will stress is that it is changed through
prayer. This is what I will focus on next week. We must pray for God’s enabling to help us delight in his Word. This will be clear from the way the psalmists pray. I hope you will come back and hear the help that the psalmists give us not only to pray without ceasing, but to do it with delight.

God of Night — кроссплатформенная игра. Благодаря гибкому движку, вы можете начать играть с помощью мини-клиента на компьютере с Windows, а продолжить на смартфоне. На данный момент есть несколько вариантов игры, выбирайте подходящий вам!

Не забудьте использовать свой аккаунт Esprit Games, когда будете запускать игру на новом устройстве, тогда ваш прогресс полностью сохраниться!
Не отрывайтесь от игры, где бы вы ни были!

На устройствах Android вы можете установить полноценную мобильную версию God of Night! Множество крутых персонажей, увлекательный геймплей и тактическое разнообразие прямо в вашем смартфоне! Не забудьте использовать свой аккаунт Esprit Games, чтобы синхронизировать прогресс браузерной и мобильной версии Нажимайте кнопку «скачать APK»!

На устройствах Apple вы можете скачать God of Night из AppStore и продолжить играть. Приготовьтесь ворваться в невероятно красивый мир полный приключений и опасностей, где вы сами определите свою судьбу! Не забудьте использовать свой аккаунт Esprit Games, чтобы синхронизировать прогресс браузерной и мобильной версии Используйте QR-код или нажимайте “Загрузите в AppStore”!!

Об игре

Приготовьтесь ворваться в невероятно красивый мир полный приключений и опасностей, где вы сами определите свою судьбу! Двигаясь по сюжету вам предстоит бросить вызов полчищам монстров, защищать деревни, зачищать подземелья, заводить необычных питомцев, биться ПВП и находить новых друзей!
Захватывающая ММОРПГ God of Night ждёт своих героев!

Игровые классы

Воин, Монах, Укун, Метеор, Дух лисы — уникальные герои со своими особенностями и навыками!
Выберите того самого, который подойдет под ваш стиль игры и взрастите его мощь до небес!

Храбрый воин, способный прорываться сквозь вражескую армию с помощью своего верного копья.

Жрец справедливости и страж правосудия, он покарает неверных и принесет в мир порядок и процветание.

Неустрашимый воин стремится к своей цели, разя врагов могущественным мечом.

За утонченной натурой прелестной танцовщицы кроется сила и непоколебимость.

Очаровательная принцесса может остановить целую армию, проводя грациозные пируэты со смертоносным мечом.

Изящная лучница уничтожает врагов в собственной грациозной и завораживающей манере.

Смиренный мастер, в котором сочетается неистовая сила дракона и просветленный разум.

Скрытная убийца, порабощающая врагов темными клинками.

Ни один смертный не устоит перед мощью легендарного демона короля-обезьян.

This verse talks about meditating or thinking deeply and focusing our minds on the Word of God. In it, God commands Joshua to meditate on His Word day and night to become prosperous and successful.

To get what Joshua 1:8 means in detail, scroll down or follow these links for the original scriptural meaning , biblical context and relative popularity.

Joshua 1:8 Translation & Meaning

What does this verse really mean? Use this table to get a word-for-word translation of the original Hebrew Scripture. This shows the English words related to the source biblical texts along with brief definitions. Follow the buttons in the right-hand column for detailed definitions and verses that use the same root words. Use this reference information to gain deeper insight into the Bible and enrich your understanding. Information based on Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance[1].

KJV Verse Original Hebrew Meaning/ Definition

This is a simplified translation of the original Hebrew word. Follow the buttons on the right to get more detail.

More 

Use the buttons below to get details on the Hebrew word and view related Bible verses that use the same root word.

This הַזֶּ֜ה The masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or that This
book סֵפֶר֩ Properly, writing (the art or a document); by implication, a book book
of the law הַתּוֹרָ֨ה A precept or statute, especially the Decalogue or Pentateuch law
shall not לֹֽא Not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles not
depart יָמ֡וּשׁ To withdraw (both literally and figuratively, whether intransitive or transitive) depart
out of thy mouth; מִפִּ֗יךָ The mouth (as the means of blowing), whether literal or figurative (particularly speech); specifically edge, portion or side; adverbially (with preposition) according to out mouth
but thou shalt meditate וְהָגִ֤יתָ To murmur (in pleasure or anger); by implication, to ponder meditate
therein day יוֹמָ֣ם Daily therein day
and night, וָלַ֔יְלָה Properly, a twist (away of the light), i.e., night; figuratively, adversity night
that לְמַ֙עַן֙ Properly, heed, i.e., purpose; used only adverbially, on account of (as a motive or an aim), teleologically, in order that that
thou mayest observe תִּשְׁמֹ֣ר Properly, to hedge about (as with thorns), i.e., guard; generally, to protect, attend to, etc mayest observe
to do לַֽעֲשׂ֔וֹת To do or make, in the broadest sense and widest application do
according to all כְּכָל Properly, the whole; hence, all, any or every (in the singular only, but often in a plural sense) according all
that is written הַכָּת֖וּב To grave, by implication, to write (describe, inscribe, prescribe, subscribe) written
therein: for כִּי (by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed therein
then אָ֛ז At that time or place; also as a conjunction, therefore then
thou shalt make אֶת Properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely) make
thy way דְּרָכֶ֖ךָ A road (as trodden); figuratively, a course of life or mode of action, often adverb way
prosperous, תַּצְלִ֥יחַ To push forward, in various senses (literal or figurative, transitive or intransitive) prosperous
and then וְאָ֥ז At that time or place; also as a conjunction, therefore then
thou shalt have good success. תַּשְׂכִּֽיל׃ To be (causatively, make or act) circumspect and hence, intelligent good success

Несмотря на то, что в игре God of Night заявлена графика в 4К, она выходит не только на ПК, но и на мобильные платформы. В ней представлен красивый и тщательно проработанный открытый мир, в котором полно мест для исследований.

Немаловажную часть проекта составляет сюжетная линия, способная удивить своими поворотами и изобилием интересных заданий. Там вы сможете познакомиться с новыми персонажами, завести дружбу с некоторыми из них, выполняя различные поручения.

Особенности игрового процесса

Как и в любой другой уважаемой ролевой игре, в God of Night существует несколько классов. Каждый из них обладает определенными достоинствами. Все они вам хорошо знакомы, если вы являетесь поклонником данного жанра.

В качестве спутника можно завести достаточно милых помощников, которые не просто будут рядом, а помогут во время сражения. Кстати, о взаимоотношениях. В God of Night вы сможете завести романтические связи с некотрыми персонажами, что еще больше позволит погрузиться в атмосферу мира фэнтези.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WordOfGod

This entry is trivia, which is cool and all, but not a trope. On a work, it goes on the Trivia tab.

Following

Go To

«The preceding paragraph is all stuff I just made up. But it’s canonical now.»

Sarah Monette, writer.

A statement regarding some ambiguous or undefined aspect of a work, the Word of God comes from someone considered to be the ultimate authority, such as the creator, director or producer. Such edicts can even go against events as were broadcast, due to someone making a mistake.

Fans may look for the Word of God to settle Fanon disputes, but the Authority may have moved on and doesn’t care to respond. In many cases the authority does not feel the need to respond; further pressure simply leads to suggestions that the fandom is misaimed. In point of fact, there are good reasons many creators don’t respond to requests for this: they want the fans to make their own interpretations. Especially in an ongoing series where the creator knows facts the fans don’t, they might very well know for a fact that both fan theories have truth in them and thus not wish to take sides. Alternatively, the author might view both readings of the story as equally acceptible, and thus not want to comment.

It’s important to keep in mind that just because someone wrote a character or setting, doesn’t mean they decided on a correct answer to every question that could possibly be asked about that character or setting. It is not at all uncommon for fans to ask questions which they believe to be obvious, but which the creator has never considered. In particular, questions about a character’s sexuality, gender identity or race often fall into this category. Everyone’s creative process is different. Not all writers make highly detailed character charts, or decide on details of a character’s identity that aren’t directly plot-relevant. The fandom might consider those details important because the work happens to speak to people who have a particular identity: but that doesn’t mean the author considered that fact important enough to spend time thinking about. Culture can play a role here as well, since what might be considered an essential fact about a person in one culture could be viewed as extraneous in another. Japanese creators, for example, will often decide what a character’s blood type is: but may not pay any mind to their sexuality. Western fans can find this very strange and frustrating.

The other reason creators often refuse to answer questions about character identity is of course, politics. This is particularly likely to be true when the creator is in a different country from the fandom. In the heat of internet discourse, it can be difficult to remember that what is a pedestrian factoid in your country can be a hot-button political issue in a different one. Creators may have good reason to fear social or even legal repercussions if they answer questions like this: something which fandoms are often not as sensitive to as they should be. Creators whose primary motivation is profit may additionally not want to alienate parts of the fandom: refusing to resolve Fanon disputes, especially if they are politically tinged, can be an effective strategy for doing that.

A number of people reject the notion of Word of God being equal to canon, considering something to be canon only if it appeared in the original source material. If the creator had wanted a certain fact to be canon, the thinking goes, they should have included it in the work to begin with. Other audience members go even further, considering the uncertainty and ambiguity of canon to be a good thing and decrying the Word of God as shackling the imagination and interpretations of the fans. These attitudes have found some acknowledgement in literary criticism: Wimsatt and Beardsley’s «The Intentional Fallacy» and Barthes’ Death of the Author essay both argue that the interpretation of a work cannot be limited to attempts to discern the «author’s intentions.»

Something else to consider is that, often, particularly when it comes to comedy shows, creators may make statements that are meant as jokes, or at least, not meant to be taken seriously. It may sometimes be difficult for people to tell if certain creators are making a genuine statement of canon or not. So, be careful when relying on things like humorous DVD commentaries and interviews on comedic talk shows for confirmation about something.

Another thorny issue is that not all stories have a single creator, and the collaborators may not actually agree with interpretations of their story that weren’t made explicit in the work. This is especially likely if they no longer work together, and particularly if they had a real-life falling out. In this case, there are multiple «Gods» given potentially contradictory explanations, so whose word is to be considered correct? Likewise, in many cases the writers of a story are not the copyright holders, meaning that they’re not the highest authorities on its meaning even if you do subscribe to the Word of God theory.

If a work has more than one creator and they disagree with each other on a crucial point, you’ll likely see fans embrace conflicting statements. What happens when multiple fans are equipped with the Word of God? What happens when one Word turns out to be more ridiculous than expected? Bible fight! The term ‘Story Bible’ is sometimes used for the definitive guidelines for writing an episode of a TV series. Two writers quoting the Story Bible back and forth are having a Bible Fight.

This is also a way that a theory can be Jossed. It’s important to remember that if you disagree with the Word of God, there’s nothing wrong with writing fan fiction that contradicts it, just don’t try to foist your preferred Fanon on fans who acknowledge the official canon or on the actual creator of the work.

Actors can be included under Word of God if they are the actual performers of the characters involved. This is because in order to perform their roles, most actors will spend time working out motivations, backstory, and even what a character is thinking in a particular scene. So even if a scene does not actually have two characters say «I love you» to each other, but the actors say that they played the roles as the two characters being in love, and the writer of the story says they were in love, then Word of God may then apply that they were in love.

When the word does not come from the creator themself but from someone involved in some ancillary role in production, that’s Word of Saint Paul. When the word does not come from the original creators but over time is still treated as such it is Word of Dante. Doesn’t always end up giving fans the answers they were looking for, such as in the case of a Flip-Flop of God (where the creator keeps changing their mind on what isn’t made explicitly canon by the actual work or multiple creators have different viewpoints on the work’s unexplained details), Shrug of God (where the creator chooses to let the fans come to their own conclusions due to either indifference or not being sure themselves) or Writer Conflicts with Canon (where what the creator says is canon is paradoxically contradicted by what is explicitly shown in the actual work). Cases of God deliberately misleading the audience go under Lying Creator or Trolling Creator. And then there are cases of fans either misinterpreting or just making up Word of God, resulting in God Never Said That.

Diagnosis of God (the creator confirming a character to have or not have a particular affliction or condition) and Word of Gay (the creator confirming a character’s sexual orientation to not be straight) are subtropes. Compare All There in the Manual. Contrast Death of the Author (the argument on whether the creator’s opinion on the work is actually worthy of merit), and What Could Have Been (where circumstances result in a work being made somewhat different from how it was originally planned to be). See also: Canon Discontinuity (where a series installment is confirmed to be non-canon), Creator Worship (where fans have a high opinion on the creators of their favorite works), Broken Base (where members of a fandom disagree on whether an aspect of a work is good or bad, some cases of which may involve whether they agree with what the creator has to say), and Revision (adding new information to the backstory that doesn’t directly contradict established canon).


Example subpages:

Examples by medium

  • Anime & Manga
  • Films � Live-Action
  • Literature
    • Captain Underpants
  • Live-Action TV
  • Video Games
    • Dark Deception
    • Friday Night Funkin’ Soft
  • Webcomics
    • Scarlet Lady
    • Sleepless Domain
    • Wonderlab
  • Western Animation
    • Centaurworld
    • The Book of Life
    • Encanto
    • Gravity Falls
    • Jimmy Two-Shoes
    • Steven Universe
    • The Owl House
    • Villainous (Cartoon Network)

Subpages that don’t belong to the above media

  • Brockton’s Celestial Forge
  • Child of the Storm
  • Dream SMP
  • Epithet Erased
  • Luz Clawthorne
  • RWBY
  • The Greatest of Them All
  • There Was Once an Avenger From Krypton
  • With This Ring

Other examples:

    open/close all folders 

With sources cited:

Who said it, and when or where they said it is included in these examples. If you don’t know when or where, even in general, please add your examples to the section below, not here.


    Comic Books 

  • A Wizard magazine interview with then-current Avengers writer Kurt Busiek and artist George Perez asked each one to convey a factoid that nobody else could provide. The contrast is striking: Busiek went for a one-sentence retcon that filled in a dangling plot thread from an obscure story from the seventies; Perez revealed that the Scarlet Witch, his favorite character, does not wear underwear.
  • Brian Clevinger himself came onto TV Tropes to deliver a Word of God in regards to Atomic Robo.
  • Gerry Conway said in this podcast interview (about 34 minutes in) (http://wordballoon.blogspot.com/2009/06/gerry-conway-on-last-days-of-animal-man.html) that Gwen Stacy was killed because John Romita Sr. wanted to shake up Spider-Man by killing off a major character. Romita wanted to kill off Aunt May but Conway suggested killing Gwen because he thought she was a fairly standard superhero love interest and thought Mary Jane would make a more interesting love interest.
  • On December 15, 2010, Spider-Man creator Stan Lee posted the following tweet: «I herewith proclaim, for the world to see, that J. Jonah Jameson�s first name is � Jeremiah! And so it shall remain�till I change my mind!» (Although this does seem a bit contradictory, however; while Jameson never actually confirmed that his name was «John» in the comic, almost everyone assumed that it was, because it is the name of both his father and son.)
    • Speaking of Stan Lee and J. Jonah Jameson, Lee also admitted on Talk of the Nation that the character was designed as a grouchier caricature of himself, and also said that he would have jumped on the opportunity to portray him in a movie.
  • There’s three things Brian Michael Bendis is particularly known for: A decompressed style that takes forever to advance the plot, his love of trolling readers, and this. For example, Bendis responded to reader revolt over his poor characterization of X-23 by stating on his Tumblr that her experiences on Murderworld changed her (rather than addressing it on-panel), claiming that Executive Meddling altered his plans for Battle of the Atom (and that the deviations in a second battle with the future brotherhood steer things where he originally planned them to go), or confirming that the time travel ending of the Will arc of Uncanny X-Men would not remove Xavier, Jr. from the timeline. And his Word Of God statements frequently get snarky, especially when combined with his love of trolling the readers or when responding to criticism.
  • Convergence writer Jeff King confirmed that all the characters held hostage by Telos regained their lost lives.
  • Robin Series Adam Beechen did not have Dana among those confirmed dead in the destruction of Bludhaven because he intended for her to have survived somehow, but this never made it into the comics.
  • Disney Kingdoms: Figment writer Jim Zub revealed on Twitter that Capri is 13 years old at the time of the events of Figment 2.

    Fan Works 

  • Hrodvitnon, author of the MonsterVerse fanfiction Abraxas, has provided multiple expansions of the story’s universe on her Tumblr and in the story’s Archive of Our Own comments section. Such expansions include but are not limited to: revealing more details about Ghidorah’s past, her Comic-Book Fantasy Casting of the Titans’ voices, Monster X’s or the Many’s capabilities, Thor’s hibernation cycle, and the characters’ internal thoughts beyond what the story describes.
  • Nimbus Llewelyn is well known for his habit of exposition and explanation in the author notes before chapters, particularly in reply to anonymous reviewers on Child of the Storm. He’s also known to sometimes explain or confirm things to individual readers, who then edit the tropes page to fit, or even to sometimes do so himself (he’s admitted that he’s a troper and occasionally «meddles» in the pages for his own amusement). Of course, his answers have also been known to be a Mathematician’s Answer, or outright lies if he feels like it.
  • The author of The Lion King Adventures, ThatPersonYouMightKnow, has confirmed many things on the fan forum that pertain to the series. Here are some notable examples:
    • Tama and Tojo both went to heaven after dying, despite their sinister actions.
    • The Interceptor became the pride’s best hunter after The End.
    • Haiba never entered a proper relationship when he grew up.
    • Haiba did eventually get over murdering Tama.
    • The fan nickname Anti-Haiba was accepted as canon.
    • Rafiki existed, hence why he is occasionally referenced, but ThatPersonYouMightKnow has confirmed that he died after Series 3.
    • Twiga, the giraffe from Haiba’s Wish, is in fact gay.
  • The author of Kira Is Justice uses Author’s Notes often to elaborate about facts in the story, and is always happy to give Word of God.
  • Sometimes used in White Devil of the Moon to address matters such as Nanoha’s reactions to her past life as Serenity, and how four Inner Senshi are able to defeat six trained Bureau operatives despite being less well-trained and not having Usagi/Nanoha’s leadership.
  • The character’s corner and author’s note in The Tainted Grimoire have both clarified a few things, such as reasons for making one thing the way it is. Also, through private messaging, cuttingmoon57 revealed him/herself to be a fan of TV Tropes.
  • Monica Gilbey-Bieber, the author of the Troll Fic One Less Lonely Gurl, has a commentary of his own fanfic in his blog. The commentary reveals interesting bits and trivia about the fanfic.
  • In Perfection Is Overrated, the author notes detail information about things such as how characters (both the canon characters and SUEs) are portrayed, some of what the author hoped to get across, and various other information, such as the fact that any attempt at collaboration between the SUEs would fail.
  • Magic Conan 14 gives bits of trivia on her profile page, on her blog and in author notes. One reference in The Dove Thief gets the award for most notable because there’s an asterisk sitting in the middle of the fic.
  • Bait and Switch has an «Author’s Notes» section at the end of each chapter that explains various things (e.g. why the USS Bajor has more Beam Spam than the Enterprise-D ever did, that Tess Phohl is an agnostic despite her taking the name of an Andorian war goddess in vain, and why Section 31 Agent Grell is tolerated). The author has also posted a number of characters’ backstories on the Star Trek fanon wiki Memory Gamma. StarSword later did the same thing with another fic, Red Fire, Red Planet.
  • The author of Sonic X: Dark Chaos keeps updates on his works and answers questions about the story. He also has explained many parts of the backstory and fleshed out the setting, and he has explained his reasoning for rewriting his story.
  • The author of Post MU: Life’s a Scream!! has given bits and pieces of her characters’ relationships and background information about Monsters University as well as the Monster World, which can be found here.
  • Glitter Force: Into the Glitterverse: In response to several comments, author NoonboryKedabory gave several bits of information not mentioned in the text, including:

    Films — Animation 

  • In Frozen, it states that Elsa was born with her powers but never says why. Jennifer Lee later revealed (about a third down) that one child is born with ice magic 1,000 years after an alignment of Saturn. It was going to be explained in the film itself but was cut, because the more you learn about a world’s magic, the more questions you have about how it works, plus it would have been too explanatory and take away from the plot’s focus.
  • The Incredibles creator Brad Bird revealed on Twitter that Helen Parr’s maiden name was Truax.
  • According to producer James Tucker, the Kid Flash seen in Teen Titans: The Judas Contract‘s flashback is actually supposed to be Barry Allen, not Wally West.
  • Turning Red:
  • The directors of Zootopia often discuss minutiae about the film on Twitter and they have at least once accepted a fan’s suggestion for a minor character’s name.
  • Unicorn Wars: Thanks to interviews with the movie creator, a lot of info on the characters and lore was revealed that was not in the movie here, here and here.
    • The creator uses a different representation of unicorns than the traditional one. In this film, unicorns are portrayed as wild animals with a healing role but do not hesitate to defend themselves or attack when threatened. The creator sees the unicorns as something akin to a pack of wolves rather than the pure white or infantile image they have been given throughout history. All unicorns are female, and the fact that they are silhouetted gives them a more mysterious aspect.
    • All the unicorns are female
    • According to the creator, UNICORN WARS looks like a fable or a fairy tale, but in reality, it is an antifable with no moral, i.e., a dark fable for adults and with a contemporary language and narrative that has its own mythology.
    • The monster that appears at the beginning and end of the film functions as a prologue and an epilogue. It�s serving as a metaphor for what�s coming later. The monster for me is a God without a form; a God adored as a leader, but a God that�s still yet to evolve. When the end comes, the God takes shape, and the prophecy of the book of the bears is fulfilled.

    Music 

  • It’s often speculated that the Generation X/Billy Idol song «Dancing with Myself» is about masturbation, but according to Idol, no, it really is about actually dancing without a partner (he claims he was inspired by a Japanese disco where the patrons chose to dance in front of mirrors, rather than with each other). The clip shows him dancing by himself because everybody else died and became zombies.
  • Unusually for Bob Dylan, he has officially confirmed the subject of his song «Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands» — it’s about his wife Sara. (See his song ‘Sara’ which contains the lyric ‘Writing Sad Eyed Lady for you’.)
  • The website Rap Genius, which allows users to provide analysis of rap songs, also allows for musicians/producers to provide insight on the lyrics.
  • Paul McCartney officially confirmed in his 1998 book Many Years From Now that one of his Beatles songs, «Got To Get You Into My Life», is about his love for marijuana.
  • The website For Everyone Now, which daily discloses new artists and hits with lyrics and videos.
  • sasakure.UK’s live broadcast on June 1, 2016 reveals that Nagare is the name of the boy in a gakuran in the Ayakashi series.

    Newspaper Comics 

  • When he was asked about the gender of his character Krazy Kat, George Herriman is quoted as having said:

    «I don’t know. I fooled around with it once; began to think the Kat is a girl, even drew up some strips with her being pregnant. It wasn’t the Kat any more. Then I realized Krazy was something like a sprite, an elf. They have no sex. So the Kat can’t be a he or a she. The Kat’s a spirit- a pixie- free to butt into anything. See what I mean?»

    • Despite this, the 1962 animated series made Krazy explicitly female, to avoid controversy.
  • Concerning the middle initial of Olivier B. Bommel, Oliver B. Bumble for the anglophones, there is a historic disagreement of Words of Gods, it was declared to be short for «Berendinus» on the letter page of the Tom Poes weekly magazine by an editor, but the author and creator stated clearly that the B. was just an initial.

    Tabletop Games 

  • The CCG Yu-Gi-Oh! game has what’s known as «BKSS — Because Konami Said So», a phenomenon where certain cards are given rulings that make no sense whatsoever, but are rendered iron-clad enforceable, because Konami — the game’s creator — said that’s how it went. At one point, UDE, the English Yu-Gi-Oh distributor, refused to administer a ruling on the card «Elemental Hero Rampart Blaster» that completely contradicted the card’s text itself; when this discrepancy was pointed out to them, even Konami themselves admitted that the ruling was in error, yet still refused to change it.
  • Magic: The Gathering has a seasonally updated database that updates the wording of every card in the game, to the point that year-old cards already have official wordings that differ from what is printed on the cards. While these changes do not usually affect how the cards work, every so often the game is given a major overhaul that changes many things at once. Changes to timing rules with the advent of 6th Edition, the Grand Creature Type Update of 2007, and the changes to combat rules and terminology for Magic 2010 come to mind.
    • The card Time Vault. For many years, Wizards of the Coast had evoked errata to curb card power and keep what were considered the ‘functional intent’ cards in place. After sweeping cleanup of power controlling errata on other cards, Time Vault continued to suffer with such errata under the claim that it was the functional intent of the card. Eventually, a player was able to address Richard Garfield, creator of Magic, about the card. Garfield confirmed the card was supposed to function as it was originally printed. The errata was fully undone shortly afterwards.
  • Gary Gygax, in the years before his death, went onto a number of Internet forums and served as something of a Word of God in that he offered rules clarifications and design justifications for the Dungeons & Dragons rules system he created.
  • Another example in D&D comes from Keith Baker’s presence on the official Dungeons and Dragons forums, where he goes by the handle HellCow. As creator of the Eberron Campaign Setting, his posts regarding the world of Eberron are largely taken as «Word of God» for the setting, though he purposefully makes sure that he is ambiguous enough that DMs can make their own choices on how they want their world to run.
  • GURPS has the «Word of Kromm», referring to the rule interpretations of Sean Punch who not only designed much of the third and fourth editions but is the editor of all official material put out for the game.
  • After going «it’s only the most popular theory» for dozens of books, in the Gehenna book White Wolf make it very clear: Caine was the first vampire.
  • The writers for Exalted appear regularly on both the White Wolf forums and rpgnet and say a great deal…or, more often, offer a few tidbits for a forthcoming release while giggling and waving non-disclosure agreements. Here and here are collections of said Words, the latter skewing more towards the current writing team.
  • 2E Mutants & Masterminds had a forum for system developer Steve Kenson to answer the questions of the players although he often answered questions indicating that a particular ruling was only his opinion in his games.
  • Almost everything we know about the backstory and lore of Sentinels of the Multiverse is this. Christopher and Adam, the games creators, hold a podcast called The Letters Page talking about the lore of heroes, villains, environments, and more. New episodes come out twice a week on tuesdays and thursdays.

    Theatre 

  • Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot:
    • He told Colin Duckworth that Pozzo is not Godot. The statement is quoted in the introduction to Duckworth�s En attendant Godot
    • He also said numerous times that «Godot is not God».

    TV Tropes 

  • The page quote for Becky Lynch’s «Awesome» page comes from The Man herself. The image posted with this tweet, since replaced, featured a bloodied Lynch.

    Web Original 

  • Tales of MU has a lot of this, possibly driven by the blog format.
  • Stuart Slade, author of The Salvation War, will answer any serious question about the logistics of his versions of Hell and Heaven and their relationship with our universe that isn’t explicitly spelled out in the story itself. None of these are necessary to following the story, but they do make a great display of how much thought he puts into it.
  • Sam Hughes, the author of Fine Structure has a page devoted to Q&A with the readers. During the original run of the story, he also clarified certain points as they were raised.
  • The Tim Tang Test, the hardest puzzle in the world (no-one has ever solved it!) has a chat box at the bottom of each level that lets you talk to anyone else taking the test. Almost every single day, Tim himself is on the chat box and is available to talk about anything.
  • Serris, the creator of the Darwin’s Soldiers universe will answer any questions raised on the discussion topic and issue proclamations with regards to the canon as well. Also, he has stated that the anthros were not human to begin with.
  • Burnie Burns, writer of Red vs. Blue, gave the community the chance to conduct two interviews just for this purpose, so long as nobody asked questions about Tex or future episodes. It is unclear whether or not that helped, though — some of the fan community believes his adherence to Rule of Funny makes Wild Mass Guessing a fruitless endeavor, while others simply believe that Burnie lies.
  • The author of Chaos Fighters sometimes gives random explanations about random things in the Random Chaos Fighters Tidbit entries of his personal journal.
  • Due to its audio-only nature, Welcome to Night Vale often requires Word of God for basic clarification. The FAQ section on the Commonplace Books website provides a helpful guide on spelling the names of the characters. Woe upon those who try to spell Khoshekh without their assistance.
  • Many statements of canon in We Are All Pok�mon Trainers are often made either in the discussion thread, the wiki, or within the chatroom.
  • When Matthew Santoro was asked by a fan why he no longer uses Lorrenzo and Big Shine, his In-Universe clones, as characters, he said that they no longer reside in Canada and have moved to Florida.
  • In Kid Time Storytime, the Storyteller Eileen has confirmed many things over the YouTube comments:
  • A rare In-Universe example in The Trial Of Tim Heidecker. Tim pays Nicholas Meyer to travel to San Bernardino as a defense witness, solely for the purpose of settling a bet with Gregg whether Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan or Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home is the one set in San Francisco.

Need identification of the source:

If you know when or where this was said, please add that information and move the example to the section above.


    Art 

  • The Seven Deadly Sins (Dix):
    • Dix claims that he didn’t add the mustache to Envy, which is based on Hitler, until after the war for fear of what the Nazis would have done to him.
    • Dix’s commentary adds a further layer to Sloth. It specifically represents the German people’s complacency during Fascism’s rising tyranny.

    Comic Books 

  • Scott Lobdell himself stated he was very surprised at the amount of controversy the first issue of Red Hood and the Outlaws caused. He goes on to say that he doesn’t see why people see Starfire as an ADD-stricken Ethical Slut. He also assures disgruntled readers to keep reading, as answers will be revealed later, not that this has stopped some people from dropping the book outright.

     Fan Works 

  • Paradoxus (Winx Club, World of Warcraft): All of the information in the Trivia tab was obtained by asking Bloom_Farella (who in turn consulted the other authors) through either comments or private messaging.
    • Among the things she has stated, there are the characters’ alignments. Following the tradition of Dungeons & Dragons, goodness is defined by putting everyone’s well-being about oneself’s whereas evilness means pursuing one’s benefit to the detriment of others. On the other hand, lawful characters tend to seek to restore the pre-war order of Magix’s society while lawless/chaotic characters forgo any semblance of rules and societal order in order to accomplish their goals. Consequently, these would be the alignments:
      • Even though Trisha and Altalune aim to end the war (thus working for everyone’s benefit), the two sisters start out as Lawful Neutral because of the methods they had to resource to. Respectively, burning one of Domino’s cities to prevent Fel from spreading and manipulating her little sister to shape her into a ruthless queen. Furthermore, Altalune blamed Trisha for their mother’s death as a coping mechanism. As the plot progresses, Trisha falls into Chaotic Neutral after her Face�Heel Turn — she’s fueled by revenge and ravages cities but ultimately kills off the people who caused the war. Altalune, on her part, develops into a True Neutral — she’s stopped caring about pretty much everything but her loved ones and herself, using both lawful and chaotic approaches as she sees fit.
      • Initially, Stacy is a solid Lawful Good mostly because she was spared from the most morally questionable decisions by virtue of still having a loving father. Later, she experiences lots of doubts but finally settles on Lawful Neutral. Lawful because she has decided to embrace the Sacred Light as her moral guiding and neutral due to the war forcing her hand into more dubious methods.
      • Gilliam and Zoe start out and remain as Lawful Good.
    • Paradoxus shares a few significant worldbuilding snippets with another one of Bloom_Farella’s fanfics, Dragon’s Daughters. For instance, queens are in charge of internal and external defense affairs while kings administer economic and political matters. This is because women are inherently much more attuned to magic (the Great Dragon said so) and therefore, better suited to command the military and maintain the peace.

    Live-Action TV 

  • Doctor Who:
    • The episode «The Brain of Morbius» shows the faces of several actors who, depending on your interpretation of the scene, may be Doctors predating the canonical first Doctor. Despite the fact that the canon is very clear on the fact that the Doctor’s lives are all accounted for, some people on the production staff have affirmed that they intended the faces to be earlier Doctors. This was eventually made canon onscreen in «The Timeless Children», making these people retroactively right.
    • What today is regarded as canon was actually only settled on relatively late in the day. For example, it wasn’t even established during «The Brain of Morbius» that Time Lords are limited to twelve regenerations (that was first mentioned in «The Deadly Assassin», broadcast the following year). Terrance Dicks, onetime script editor of Doctor Who and the man who introduced the concept of the Time Lords themselves to the show, famously once stated that ‘canon was what the production team could remember on any given day.’
    • When «The End of Time» aired, there was considerable dispute over the true identity of The Woman who kept showing up. Russell T. Davies has confirmed that she is in fact meant to be the Doctor’s mother, although they intentionally left it open to interpretation.
  • Creator of the tragically short lived Pushing Daisies Bryan Fuller revealed how he envisioned the show ending in a TV Guide interview: Emerson gets back together with his wife. The watches only led to a buried treasure and had no bearing on Ned’s powers. The world finds out about Chuck and she goes off and travels with her parents to hide from the attention. She and Ned have a long, loving relationship. Many, many years later they finally kiss when Ned is on his deathbed and Chuck hasn’t aged a day.
  • Battlestar Galactica (2003) has occasionally relied on this, such as producer Mark Verheiden confirming that Six was released from prison as part of President Lee Adama’s amnesty to the rebel and Final Five Cylons in the episode «Revelations». At times, the Word of God has simply made things more confused. In the episode «Hero» it is stated that Tigh and Adama served on the battlestar Valkyrie one year before the series begins and were moved to Galactica as punishment after a vital mission failed. This contradicts statements made in several other episodes that Adama had commanded Galactica for 2-3 years prior to the series. And worse still, a document seen on-screen in the very same episode suggested he’d actually been in command of Galactica for six years. When asked about the problem, producer Ronald D. Moore said there wasn’t a problem, they’d worked it out behind the scenes and it all tracked, but didn’t share this explanation with fans, leaving the situation unresolved. Many people resolve this by assuming they were moved back to Galactica from active duty on the Valkyrie, the punishment being command of an inactive ship.
  • Power Rangers:
    • Power Rangers RPM: is stated to take place in an Alternate Universe, separate from the other Ranger series. Good thing too, or else that would have meant all the previous Rangers and/or their descendants would have been horribly killed in the end and all their work for naught. This was later canonized when Scott crossed dimensions and guest-starred in Power Rangers Samurai.
    • On a lighter note, Tommy really does end up marrying Kat and Kimberly eventually marries Skull, although for obvious reasons, those little tidbits are all but ignored. Even when such relationships should get referenced in later series, the subject never comes up (Tommy’s a regular in Dino Thunder but apparently still single, Skull’s son appears in Samurai but his mom is never mentioned).
    • Also, Power Rangers S.P.D. had the writers explain a lot of things that had not been competently conveyed in the series itself.
    • Johnathan Tzachor, producer of the franchise for all of Saban’s seasons, has claimed that any season he didn’t produce either in part or full (Power Rangers Ninja Storm, Power Rangers: Dino Thunder, Power Rangers S.P.D., Power Rangers Mystic Force, Power Rangers Operation Overdrive, Power Rangers Jungle Fury and Power Rangers RPM) are no longer considered as being part of the franchise’s canon. However, in this case he’s been overruled by Saban.
  • There was some speculation that the Father Ted character Father Noel Furlong, a youth group leader, was having sex with the young people in his charge and was therefore a comment on paedophillia in the Catholic Church. (The fact that the character was played by Graham Norton helped this view). The creators have confirmed that the character is actually asexual and the joke is that the character is too enthusiastic about the quite normal behaviour of the young people.
  • A strange example of this trope is Twin Peaks, as creator David Lynch has stated that he does not support the identity of Laura Palmer’s killer being her father, as he was a victim to Executive Meddling, and wanted the mystery of the killer to go on for the entire series. He therefore claims that the killer could be anybody.

    Newspaper Comics 

  • Charles Schulz of Peanuts stated that Linus’ belief in the Great Pumpkin is not and was never intended to be a metaphor for faith. Strips later in the run (featuring such things as Linus going door to door to spread the word of the Great Pumpkin, convincing Marcie before she is sent to be «deprogrammed» by her parents) suggest he was open to playing with the idea. Other issues for which Schulz gave official answers include stating that the comic strip was canon and the animated specials and movies weren’t, explaining how Snoopy can sleep on top of his doghouse (his ears lock him into place), confirming that Charlie Brown isn’t bald (he has really short blond hair), and perhaps indirectly the Peppermint Patty-Marcie-lesbian issue (when asked whether he ever dealt with sexuality in Peanuts, he said «These are just little kids. That really puts a lid on it right there.»)

    Tabletop Games 

  • Warhammer 40,000 creator Rick Priestly has confirmed that the two «missing» Primarchs exist to provide fodder for player-created Space Marine chapters and Chaos Space Marine Legions, and will never be identified.

    Other 

  • BIONICLE story writer Greg Farshtey kept a close relationship with the fan community. Not only did Greg provide answers for any question a fan might have had, but he sometimes distributed advance information and occasionally allowed fans to influence canon details, ranging from names of obscure characters to giving visual designs to characters who had no merch. After the franchise ended in 2010 and LEGO’s rules restricted Greg’s connection to the fans to specific websites, he still kept revealing planned story ideas and approving fan-made character models, up until his departure from the company in 2022.
  • When Matthew Santoro was asked which of his clones would win in a fight to the death, he said that surprisingly, it would be Eugene, the nerd — despite being physically weak, he would be able to build something like a tank to defend himself, because he’s the only clone intelligent enough to do so.
  • An unusual in-universe and The Fourth Wall Will Not Protect You example in Daisy Brown; someone uses YouTube closed captions to give some weird introspective insights into Daisy’s life and state of being. Some of the more disturbing ones include Daisy (probably, maybe) remembering (or at least interpreting) her mother’s Death by Childbirth and her father in vicious denial of it.
  • The infamous «Mollusks, snails» image is known for appearing in DeviantArt search results thanks to a number of «tags» in the description. When asked about the tags, the original poster, Ger-hard, claimed that he was in some sort of competition with another Deviant who posted a photo of a roadside traffic sign with the same type of description to see who could get closest to the top in as many searches as possible.

Alternative Title(s):
Words Of God

  • Writer Conflicts with Canon
  • Canon Universe
  • Diagnosis of God

  • Willing Suspension of Disbelief
  • Pt/�ndice de Tradu��o
  • Writer on Board

  • Word of Gay
  • Continuity Tropes
  • Word of Saint Paul

  • Visigoths vs. Mall Goths
  • Speculative Fiction LGBT
  • Alice and the Nightmare

  • A.A. Pessimal
  • Schoolgirl Series
  • Catholic School Girls Rule

  • Webcomic/Scarlet Lady
  • No Name Given

  • Word of Gay
  • Trivia
  • Word of Saint Paul

  • Willing Suspension of Disbelief
  • JustForFun/Tropes of Legend
  • Writer on Board

  • Woolseyism
  • SquarePegRoundTrope/Q to Z
  • The Worf Effect

  • Windows of the Soul
  • Administrivia/Image Pickin’ Special Cases
  • X-Pac Heat

  • Grand Theft Auto
  • Wiki Sandbox
  • Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance

  • Played for Laughs
  • Overdosed Tropes
  • Deadpan Snarker

  • The World Is Not Ready
  • TimeImmemorial/Tropes T to Z
  • The Worf Barrage

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Nice is a boring word
  • Nieces and nephews in one word
  • Nice girl in the word
  • Nicknames with the word love in it
  • Nickname generator with word