Is presupposing a word

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the branch of linguistics known as pragmatics, a presupposition (or PSP) is an implicit assumption about the world or background belief relating to an utterance whose truth is taken for granted in discourse. Examples of presuppositions include:

  • Jane no longer writes fiction.
    • Presupposition: Jane once wrote fiction.
  • Have you stopped eating meat?
    • Presupposition: you had once eaten meat.
  • Have you talked to Hans?
    • Presupposition: Hans exists.

A presupposition must be mutually known or assumed by the speaker and addressee for the utterance to be considered appropriate in context. It will generally remain a necessary assumption whether the utterance is placed in the form of an assertion, denial, or question, and can be associated with a specific lexical item or grammatical feature (presupposition trigger) in the utterance.

Crucially, negation of an expression does not change its presuppositions: I want to do it again and I don’t want to do it again both presuppose that the subject has done it already one or more times; My wife is pregnant and My wife is not pregnant both presuppose that the subject has a wife. In this respect, presupposition is distinguished from entailment and implicature. For example, The president was assassinated entails that The president is dead, but if the expression is negated, the entailment is not necessarily true.

Negation of a sentence containing a presupposition[edit]

If presuppositions of a sentence are not consistent with the actual state of affairs, then one of two approaches can be taken. Given the sentences My wife is pregnant and My wife is not pregnant when one has no wife, then either:

  1. Both the sentence and its negation are false; or
  2. Strawson’s approach: Both «my wife is pregnant» and «my wife is not pregnant» use a wrong presupposition (i.e. that there exists a referent which can be described with the noun phrase my wife) and therefore can not be assigned truth values.

Bertrand Russell tries to solve this dilemma with two interpretations of the negated sentence:

  1. «There exists exactly one person, who is my wife and who is not pregnant»
  2. «There does not exist exactly one person, who is my wife and who is pregnant.»

For the first phrase, Russell would claim that it is false, whereas the second would be true according to him.

Projection of presuppositions[edit]

A presupposition of a part of an utterance is sometimes also a presupposition of the whole utterance, and sometimes not. For instance, the phrase my wife triggers the presupposition that I have a wife. The first sentence below carries that presupposition, even though the phrase occurs inside an embedded clause. In the second sentence, however, it does not. John might be mistaken about his belief that I have a wife, or he might be deliberately trying to misinform his audience, and this has an effect on the meaning of the second sentence, but, perhaps surprisingly, not on the first one.

  1. John thinks that my wife is beautiful.
  2. John said that my wife is beautiful.

Thus, this seems to be a property of the main verbs of the sentences, think and say, respectively. After work by Lauri Karttunen,[1] verbs that allow presuppositions to «pass up» to the whole sentence («project») are called holes, and verbs that block such passing up, or projection of presuppositions are called plugs. Some linguistic environments are intermediate between plugs and holes: They block some presuppositions and allow others to project. These are called filters. An example of such an environment are indicative conditionals («If-then» clauses). A conditional sentence contains an antecedent and a consequent. The antecedent is the part preceded by the word «if,» and the consequent is the part that is (or could be) preceded by «then.» If the consequent contains a presupposition trigger, and the triggered presupposition is explicitly stated in the antecedent of the conditional, then the presupposition is blocked. Otherwise, it is allowed to project up to the entire conditional. Here is an example:

If I have a wife, then my wife is blonde.

Here, the presupposition (that I have a wife) triggered by the expression my wife is blocked, because it is stated in the antecedent of the conditional: That sentence doesn’t imply that I have a wife. In the following example, it is not stated in the antecedent, so it is allowed to project, i.e. the sentence does imply that I have a wife.

If it’s already 4am, then my wife is probably angry.

Hence, conditional sentences act as filters for presuppositions that are triggered by expressions in their consequent.

A significant amount of current work in semantics and pragmatics is devoted to a proper understanding of when and how presuppositions project.

Presupposition triggers[edit]

A presupposition trigger is a lexical item or linguistic construction which is responsible for the presupposition, and thus «triggers» it.[2] The following is a selection of presuppositional triggers following Stephen C. Levinson’s classic textbook on Pragmatics, which in turn draws on a list produced by Lauri Karttunen. As is customary, the presuppositional triggers themselves are italicized, and the symbol » stands for ‘presupposes’.[3]

Definite descriptions[edit]

Definite descriptions are phrases of the form «the X» where X represents a noun phrase. The description is said to be proper when the phrase applies to exactly one object, and conversely, it is said to be improper when either there exist more than one potential referents, as in «the senator from Ohio», or none at all, as in «the king of France». In conventional speech, definite descriptions are implicitly assumed to be proper, hence such phrases trigger the presupposition that the referent is unique and existent.

  • John saw the man with two heads.
    »there exists a man with two heads.

Factive verbs[edit]

In Western epistemology, there is a tradition originating with Plato of defining knowledge as justified true belief. On this definition, for someone to know X, it is required that X be true. A linguistic question thus arises regarding the usage of such phrases: does a person who states «John knows X» implicitly claim the truth of X? Steven Pinker explored this question in a popular science format in a 2007 book on language and cognition, using a widely publicized example from a speech by a U.S. president.[4] A 2003 speech by George W. Bush included the line, «British Intelligence has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.»[5] Over the next few years, it became apparent that this intelligence lead was incorrect. But the way the speech was phrased, using a factive verb, implicitly framed the lead as truth rather than hypothesis. There is however a strong alternative view that factivity thesis, the proposition that relational predicates having to do with knowledge, such as knows, learn, remembers, and realized, presuppose the factual truth of their object, is incorrect.[6]

  • Martha regrets drinking John’s home brew.
    • Presupposition: Martha did in fact drink John’s home brew.
  • Frankenstein was aware that Dracula was there.
    • Presupposition: Dracula was in fact there.
  • John realized that he was in debt.
    • Presupposition: John was in fact in debt.
  • It was odd how proud he was.
    • Presupposition: He was in fact proud.

Some further factive predicates: know; be sorry that; be proud that; be indifferent that; be glad that; be sad that.

Implicative verbs[edit]

  • John managed to open the door.
    »John tried to open the door.
  • John forgot to lock the door.
    »John ought to have locked, or intended to lock, the door.

Some further implicative predicates: X happened to V»X didn’t plan or intend to V; X avoided Ving»X was expected to, or usually did, or ought to V, etc.

Change of state or continuation of state verbs[edit]

With these presupposition triggers, the current unfolding situation is considered presupposed information.[7]

  • John stopped teasing his wife.
    »John had been teasing his wife.
  • Joan began teasing her husband.
    »Joan hadn’t been teasing her husband.

Some further change of state verbs: start; finish; carry on; cease; take (as in X took Y from Z » Y was at/in/with Z); leave; enter; come; go; arrive; etc.

Iteratives[edit]

These types of triggers presuppose the existence of a previous state of affairs.[7]

  • The flying saucer came again.
    »The flying saucer came before.
  • You can’t get gobstoppers anymore.
    »You once could get gobstoppers.
  • Carter returned to power.
    »Carter held power before.

Further iteratives: another time; to come back; restore; repeat; for the nth time.

Temporal clauses[edit]

The situation explained in a clause that begins with a temporal clause constructor is typically considered backgrounded information.[7]

  • Before Strawson was even born, Frege noticed presuppositions.
    »Strawson was born.
  • While Chomsky was revolutionizing linguistics, the rest of social science was asleep.
    »Chomsky was revolutionizing linguistics.
  • Since Churchill died, we’ve lacked a leader.
    »Churchill died.

Further temporal clause constructors: after; during; whenever; as (as in As John was getting up, he slipped).

Cleft sentences[edit]

Cleft sentence structures highlight particular aspects of a sentence and consider the surrounding information to be backgrounded knowledge. These sentences are typically not spoken to strangers, but rather to addressees who are aware of the ongoing situation.[7]

  • Cleft construction: It was Henry that kissed Rosie.
    »Someone kissed Rosie.
  • Pseudo-cleft construction: What John lost was his wallet.
    »John lost something.

Comparisons and contrasts[edit]

Comparisons and contrasts may be marked by stress (or by other prosodic means), by particles like «too», or by comparatives constructions.

  • Marianne called Adolph a male chauvinist, and then HE insulted HER.
    »For Marianne to call Adolph a male chauvinist would be to insult him.
  • Carol is a better linguist than Barbara.
    »Barbara is a linguist.

Counterfactual conditionals[edit]

  • If the notice had only said ‘mine-field’ in Welsh as well as in English, we would never have lost poor Llewellyn.
    »The notice didn’t say ‘mine-field’ in Welsh.

Questions[edit]

Questions often presuppose what the assertive part of the question presupposes, but interrogative parts might introduce further presuppositions. There are three different types of questions: yes/no questions, alternative questions and WH-questions.

  • Is there a professor of linguistics at MIT?
    »Either there is a professor of linguistics at MIT or there isn’t.
  • Is Newcastle in England or in Australia?
    »Newcastle is in England or Newcastle is in Australia.
  • Who is the professor of linguistics at MIT?
    »Someone is the professor of linguistics at MIT.

Possessive case[edit]

  • John’s children are very noisy.
    »John has children.

Accommodation of presuppositions[edit]

A presupposition of a sentence must normally be part of the common ground of the utterance context (the shared knowledge of the interlocutors) in order for the sentence to be felicitous. Sometimes, however, sentences may carry presuppositions that are not part of the common ground and nevertheless be felicitous. For example, I can, upon being introduced to someone, out of the blue explain that my wife is a dentist, this without my addressee having ever heard, or having any reason to believe that I have a wife. In order to be able to interpret my utterance, the addressee must assume that I have a wife. This process of an addressee assuming that a presupposition is true, even in the absence of explicit information that it is, is usually called presupposition accommodation. We have just seen that presupposition triggers like my wife (definite descriptions) allow for such accommodation. In «Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem»,[8] the philosopher Saul Kripke noted that some presupposition triggers do not seem to permit such accommodation. An example of that is the presupposition trigger too. This word triggers the presupposition that, roughly, something parallel to what is stated has happened. For example, if pronounced with emphasis on John, the following sentence triggers the presupposition that somebody other than John had dinner in New York last night.

John had dinner in New York last night, too.

But that presupposition, as stated, is completely trivial, given what we know about New York. Several million people had dinner in New York last night, and that in itself doesn’t satisfy the presupposition of the sentence. What is needed for the sentence to be felicitous is really that somebody relevant to the interlocutors had dinner in New York last night, and that this has been mentioned in the previous discourse, or that this information can be recovered from it. Presupposition triggers that disallow accommodation are called anaphoric presupposition triggers.

Presupposition in critical discourse analysis[edit]

Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is a broad study belonging to not one research category. It focuses on identifying presuppositions of an abstract nature from varying perspectives. CDA is considered critical, not only in the sense of being analytical, but also in the ideological sense.[9]
Through the analysis of written texts and verbal speech, Teun A. van Dijk (2003) says CDA studies power imbalances existing in both the conversational and political spectrum.[9] With the purpose of first identifying and then tackling inequality in society, van Dijk describes CDA as a nonconformist piece of work.[9] One notable feature of ideological presuppositions researched in CDA is a concept termed synthetic personalisation[10]

Logical construct[edit]

To describe a presupposition in the context of propositional calculus and truth-bearers, Belnap defines «A sentence is a presupposition of a question if the truth of the sentence is a necessary condition of the question’s having some true answer.» Then referring to the semantic theory of truth, interpretations are used to formulate a presupposition: «Every interpretation which makes the question truly answerable is an interpretation which makes the presupposed sentence true as well.»

A sentence that expresses a presupposition in a question may be characterized as follows: the question has some true answer if and only if the sentence is true.[11]

See also[edit]

  • Common ground
  • Conversational scoreboard
  • Double-barreled question
  • Dynamic semantics
  • Fallacy of many questions
  • Loaded question
  • Performative contradiction
  • Speech act

References[edit]

  1. ^ Karttunen, Lauri (1974) [1]. Theoretical Linguistics 1 181-94. Also in Pragmatics: A Reader, Steven Davis (ed.), pages 406-415, Oxford University Press, 1991.
  2. ^ Kadmon, Nirit. Formal pragmatics: semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, and focus. Great Britain: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001, page 10.
  3. ^ Levinson, Stephen C. Pragmatics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 181-184.
  4. ^ Pinker, Steven (2007), The stuff of thought: language as a window into human nature, Penguin Books, ISBN 978-0-670-06327-7, pp. 6–9. CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  5. ^ Bush, George W., State of the Union Address, January 28th, 2003.
  6. ^ Hazlett, A. (2010). «The Myth of Factive Verbs». Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 80 (3): 497–522. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00338.x.
  7. ^ a b c d Sedivy, Julie, and Carlson, Greg N. (2011). «Sold on Language: How Advertisers Talk to You and What This Says About You,» Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 104-105.
  8. ^ Kripke, Saul (2009) «Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem,» Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 40, No. 3, Pages 367-386. [2]
  9. ^ a b c
    «Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is a type of discourse analytical research that primarily studies the way social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context. With such dissident research, critical discourse analysts take explicit position, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately resist social inequality.»
    Teun Adrianus van Dijk, «Critical Discourse Analysis Archived 2009-02-06 at the Wayback Machine», chapter 18 in Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, (Wiley-Blackwell, 2003): pp. 352–371.
  10. ^ «Synthetic personalisation», Wikipedia, 2017-07-29, retrieved 2020-05-15
  11. ^ Nuel D. Belnap, Jr. (1966) «Questions, Answers, and Presuppositions», The Journal of Philosophy 63(20): 609–11, American Philosophical Association Eastern Division Sixty-Third Annual Meeting. doi:10.2307/2024255

Further reading[edit]

  • Beaver, David.[dead link] 1997. Presupposition. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, pp. 939–1008.
  • Henk Zeevat. 2007. Accommodation. In Ramchand, G. and C. Reiss (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford University Press. pp. 503–538.

External links[edit]

  • Geurts, Bart. «Presupposition». In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.


Asked by: Dominique Yost

Score: 4.2/5
(71 votes)

Presupposition, broadly conceived, is a type of inference associated with utterances of natural-language sentences. … Typically, the presuppositional inferences of an utterance are already known to be true and accepted by the conversational participants, or, at least, the speaker assumes so when the utterance is made.

What is presupposition in pragmatics with examples?

In the branch of linguistics known as pragmatics, a presupposition (or PSP) is an implicit assumption about the world or background belief relating to an utterance whose truth is taken for granted in discourse. … Examples of presuppositions include: Jane no longer writes fiction.

What is presupposition and its types?

Presupposition deals with implicit meanings conveyed by the speaker trhough the use of particular words. There are six types of presupposition or presupposition triggers (Yule, 1996). Those are existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive, and counter-factual.

What is a linguistic presupposition NLP?

The NLP presuppositions can be viewed as a fundamental set of principles on how you may choose to live your life. A linguistic presupposition is something that is overtly expressed in the body of the statement itself, which must be presupposed or accepted in order for the sentence or utterance to make sense.

What are presuppositions used for?

On the one hand, presuppositions are considered an essential prerequisite for understanding the content expressed by an utterance and for the coherence of the semantic relations between the sentences that constitute a discourse. In this respect, therefore, they play a purely semantic role.

21 related questions found

What triggers presupposition?

Definition: A presupposition trigger is a construction or item that signals the existence of a presupposition in an utterance. Both positive and negative forms are presented, showing that the presuppositions are constant under negation: Definite descriptions.

What is the concept of presupposition?

Presupposition, broadly conceived, is a type of inference associated with utterances of natural-language sentences. … Typically, the presuppositional inferences of an utterance are already known to be true and accepted by the conversational participants, or, at least, the speaker assumes so when the utterance is made.

What are the six presuppositions of NLP?

Presuppositions of NLP

  • Have respect for the other person’s model of the world. …
  • The map is not the territory. …
  • Mind and body form a linked system. …
  • If what you are doing isn’t working, do something else. …
  • Choice is better than no choice. …
  • We are always communicating. …
  • The meaning of your communication is the response you get.

What are the NLP techniques?

Let’s explore 5 common techniques used for extracting information from the above text.

  • Named Entity Recognition. The most basic and useful technique in NLP is extracting the entities in the text. …
  • Sentiment Analysis. …
  • Text Summarization. …
  • Aspect Mining. …
  • Topic Modeling.

How many NLP presuppositions are there?

What are the 16 NLP presuppositions? NLP has a number of assumptions, or starting points. You can best see them as a number of basic principles that you automatically apply and respect when working with NLP.

What is difference between presupposition and entailment?

Entailment and presupposition are two pragmatic elements that help us in this. The key difference between entailment and presupposition is that entailment is the relationship between two sentences whereas presupposition is an assumption made by the speaker prior to making an utterance.

What are the types of Implicatures?

There are four types of implicature; conventional implicature, conversational implicature, generalized conversational implicature and particularized conversational implicature. Each types has characteristics such as cancellable, calculable, detachable, conventionally, and determinate (Grice, 1975).

What is the difference between presupposition and presumption?

is that presumption is the act of presuming, or something presumed while presupposition is presupposition.

What is a presupposition question?

Now we are in a position to define presupposition of a question. Definition 1. Presupposition of an empirical question Q is a proposition P that is entailed by each complete answer corresponding to an unambiguous direct answer.

What is the difference between implicature and presupposition?

Implicature is when a speaker implies meaning without saying the information outright. … Presupposition is when the speaker assumes some background information when making a statement.

What is the difference between assumption and presupposition?

As nouns the difference between presupposition and assumption. is that presupposition is an assumption made beforehand; a preliminary conjecture or speculation while assumption is the act of assuming]], or taking to or upon one’s self; the act of [[take up|taking up or adopting.

Can you use NLP on yourself?

“Doing NLP on yourself is like playing tennis alone. You can do it, but it’s very slow.” The Problem Is That You Can’t Be In Two Places At Once. You can’t be in your head, having the feelings that create the state you want to work with, and at the same time be outside of yourself, analyzing what might be going on.

What are the types of NLP?

Types of Natural language processing techniques

  • The Importance of NLP. …
  • What is NLP? …
  • Named Entity Recognition. …
  • Sentiment Analysis. …
  • Text Summarization. …
  • Aspect Mining. …
  • Topic Modeling. …
  • Machine Translation.

Can NLP help with anxiety?

NLP can assist in anxiety by reframing the trigger points of where the anxiety is stemming from. By rewiring the way the brain reacts to certain situations, patterns, traumas and behaviors it will allow your brain to function from a more stable and responsive place.

What are the pillars of NLP?

There are fours aspects of NLP referred to as the four pillars.

  • Pillar one: outcomes.
  • Pillar two: sensory acuity.
  • Pillar three: behavioural flexibility.
  • Pillar four: rapport.

What is a Submodality NLP?

A submodality in neuro-linguistic programming is a distinction of form or structure (rather than content) within a sensory representational system. For example, regardless of the content, both external and mental images of any kind will be either colored or monochrome, and stationary or moving.

What are the main principles of NLP?

In order for anything from NLP to be successfully applied, there are five basic principles that need to be respected.

  • Know Your Outcome. You need to know your outcome. …
  • Take Action. While this might seem self evident, many people do not do that. …
  • Sensory Acuity. …
  • Behavioural Flexibility. …
  • Physiology of Excellence.

What is the importance of presupposition triggers to presupposition?

Using presupposition triggers, the author or speaker may subject to the reader’s or listener’s interpretation of facts and events, establishing either a favorable or unfavorable bias throughout the text. Presupposition deals with implicit meanings conveyed by the speaker trhough the use of particular words.

What is the difference between sentence and utterance?

The difference between a sentence and utterance is that while a sentence conveys a complete meaning through a combination of clauses, an utterance conveys a meaning through a few words that may not even compile a clause. A sentence is in both written and spoken language, but an utterance is in spoken language only.

What is entailment and example?

In pragmatics (linguistics), entailment is the relationship between two sentences where the truth of one (A) requires the truth of the other (B). For example, the sentence (A) The president was assassinated. entails (B) The president is dead.

Basically, a presupposition occurs when you base something on a presumption. For example, if you presume it’s going to rain, you might say, «I’ll get my rain jacket before I leave.» It’s a pretzel of a concept when you get into it, though, so here we un-pretzel the pragmatics of the presupposition, including using the negation test to determine whether or not something is a presupposition in the first place.

Presupposition Meaning

In pragmatics, the meaning of presupposition is more or less synonymous with the common term, at least on the surface.

Presupposition: an assumed-to-be-true fact upon which an utterance is delivered

For a simple example, take this sentence:

The dog no longer barks at the mailman.

Although it is unstated, the speaker assumes something to be true here.

  • The speaker presupposes the dog once barked at the mailman.

After all, if the dog did not once bark, there would be little cause to say it no longer barks. And if the dog never barked at the mailman, the utterance would probably be:

The dog has never barked at the mailman.

Where the discussion of presupposition in pragmatics might differ from the broader discussion of presupposition lies in the goal of pragmatic discourse. Pragmatic discourse aims to explain how language impacts social interactions. Pragmatism values immediacy as well as context, which means that many presuppositions in the utterance “the dog no longer barks at the mailman” are less important or potentially irrelevant, such as these:

  • The speaker presupposes there’s a dog in this situation.

  • The speaker presupposes dogs can bark.

  • The speaker presupposes a bark can be directed at something.

  • The speaker presupposes dogs and mailmen exist.

These presuppositions increasingly become a matter of existential, not pragmatic, discourse. Take a closer look at this one:

  • The speaker presupposes dogs and mailmen exist.

No one outside an existential or ontological arena would dispute this. Indeed, the only arguments to be made that dogs and mailmen don’t exist are existential. This is because, observably and in the plain use of the word “existence,” dogs and mailmen exist. As such, this presupposition has limited social relevancy and is unlikely to be on the speaker’s mind when saying, “The dog no longer barks at the mailman.”

Presupposition. A mailman. StudySmarter.Fig. 1 — You can make countless presuppositions about mailmen, but not all are relevant to a given situation.

So while a pragmatist would recognize “dogs and mailmen exist” are presuppositions, they are of lesser interest because they provide less immediate context.

A presupposition is taken for granted. More pragmatically interesting presuppositions are those things “taken for granted” that might be false.

On the other end of the spectrum, the most immediate presupposition of “the dog has never barked at the mailman” is “the dog once barked at the mailman.” Although it is not likely to be in question, the change in the dog’s condition (from barking to not barking) is the subject of the utterance. This is what the person is talking about. Thus, it is most relevant to the utterance; thus, it is most relevant to the pragmatic discussion.

So while any given utterance has countless presuppositions, in pragmatic terms, the most remarkable presuppositions have social immediacy. This form of relevancy can be determined by the utterance’s intent, the conditions of the presupposition, and other factors, such as the presupposition’s ramifications.

In an amusing twist of fate, if two Buddhists were discussing the nature of non-being, a pragmatist would suddenly become very interested in ontological presuppositions because ontology is the subject of their social interaction!

Presupposition Negation Test

One interesting (and useful) aspect of a true presupposition is its ability to be tested by negation.

Presupposition negation test: when you take a positive utterance, turn it negative, and see whether the presupposition of the positive utterance remains true in the negative. If it remains true, then the presupposition is, indeed, a presupposition.

A presupposition of a positive utterance is not invalidated when you turn that utterance negative.

Take this example of the test.

Utterance: The girl drinks milk.

  • Presupposition: girls can drink milk

Utterance in the negative: The girl does not drink milk.

  • The presupposition “girls can drink milk” is not invalidated or subject to any necessary change. Thus, the presupposition passes the test and is a presupposition.

The negation test is useful for distinguishing presuppositions from entailments.

Linguistic entailment: when a less specific sentence variation is made true by a true sentence. It’s a mode of deductive reasoning.

For example, “Winnie is a brown dog” entails “Winnie is a dog.” Therefore, if “Winnie is a brown dog” is true, the less specific sentence “Winnie is a dog” is made true.

The following charts contain utterances in the positive and negative as well as example presuppositions and entailments.

Presupposition

Entailment

Winnie is a brown dog.

Dogs can be brown.

Winnie is a dog. Winnie is brown.

Winnie is not a brown dog.

Dogs can be brown. (can remain true)

Winnie is not brown, not a dog, or not either.

Notice how the entailment must change to be true in the negative; this isn’t the case with the presupposition, which can continue to remain true in the negative.

Presuppositions are implicit and not explicit in an utterance, while entailments are explicit and not implicit in an utterance.

Don’t think that “Winnie is not a brown dog” presupposes “dogs can be brown.” The reason is pretty simple: if you think one supposes the other in that case, then you should also think that “Winnie is not a blue dog” presupposes “dogs can be blue.” They follow the same formula, yet obviously, “Winnie is not a blue dog” doesn’t presuppose dogs can be blue; it is a mere utterance of fact — absurdly pointless though it is.

This is why the negation test for presuppositions merely checks that a presupposition can be true in the negative and not that it is true in the negative. For a test to work, the logic must remain consistent across all kinds of examples, including absurd ones.

This isn’t to say there are no presuppositions for the utterance “Winnie is not a brown dog.” A presupposition of it would be “things don’t have to be brown dogs.” Another would be, “something can be called Winnie.” However, that’s about it.

Types of Presuppositions

A pragmatist can use various linguistic cues called presupposition triggers to identify presuppositions; here are some common types.

Definitive Descriptions

The definitive description is a common cue that a presupposition has occurred. A definitive description occurs when one thing is put in context.

One thing: The smile

One thing in context: The smile warmed my heart.

The presupposition: There was a smile.

Questions

Questions cue a presupposition because they presuppose an answer is possible.

The question: What are you making?

The presupposition: Something can be made.

Factive Verbs

Factive verbs presuppose that something is the case. Some factive verbs include to learn, to realize, and to be aware.

The use of a factive verb: I learned Rachel has a sister.

Because one can’t learn something if that something doesn’t exist, the presupposition here is that Rachel has a sister.

Factive verbs work on the merit of a presupposed condition.

Iteratives

Iteratives describe something in a different form, presupposing other forms have or will exist. Iteratives often describe occurrences.

The use of an iterative: The truck stopped this time.

The presupposition: The truck didn’t stop at another time or may not stop the next time.

Temporal Clauses

Temporal clauses presuppose that something did or will happen. Because they are clauses, temporal clauses contain a subject and a predicate, and thus they describe a complete condition for something else to occur.

The use of a temporal clause: When things go south, I buy nacho cheese to eat by the gallon.

The presupposition: Things have gone south before.

Presupposition. Nacho chips and cheese pillow bountifully in a bowl. StudySmarter.Fig. 2 — Different temporal clauses can result in the same thing. Someone else might say, «When I watch football, I buy nacho cheese to eat by the gallon.»

Presupposition Examples

Try to identify the most relevant presupposition in the following example. Again, pragmatically, try to find what’s relevant to the social context. To aid you, this example will include a situation.

The situation: The mayor of a big city is speaking to reporters about a criminal at large.

Mayor: We’ve just learned that the notorious Crockpot Killer has claimed another victim.

Now, try to identify some relevant presuppositions. Here are two:

  • The factive verb “to learn” presupposes that everything following it did indeed happen, or else it could not be learned. In other words, the notorious Crockpot Killer did, in fact, claim another victim.

  • The iterative “another” presupposes that the Crockpot Killer has claimed at least one previous victim.

Now, neither of these things would matter much if what the mayor says is true. However, say the victim is later identified as not a victim of the Crockpot Killer. The mayor would naturally need to answer some hard questions. However, because she used a factive verb in the earlier report, she might retort to any criticism with something like:

Mayor: That’s what I learned from the police.

By saying this, the mayor puts the burden on the police. She reported the news thinking it was a fact.

As you can see, to examine presuppositions meaningfully, you need quite a bit of context.

Presupposition vs. Presumption

In pragmatics, there is no specific term called “presumption.” A presumption is merely the common usage.

Presumption: something assumed to be true. It is synonymous with an implicit assumption.

A presupposition is a kind of presumption. The only difference is that a presupposition is a pragmatic term used to describe a kind of presumption upon which a distinct idea is founded.

For example, if you presume cats don’t like dogs, you might make the statement:

When the dog comes into the room, the cat will run.

In this example, the presupposition is also that “cats don’t like dogs” because you’ve used that presumption to draw a conclusion.

Now, note that presumptions are not like arguments. Presumptions are things you don’t even think to consider. They are a given. So, if you presume cats don’t like dogs and say, “When the dog comes into the room, the cat will run,” you’re not stating an argument so much as you’re stating what is, to you, a fact.

In turn, things you presume to be facts are presuppositions.

Think of a presumption as a building block. It’s a more generic term that helps to pull into focus the pragmatic presupposition.

Presupposition — Key Takeaways

  • A presupposition is an assumed-to-be-true fact upon which an utterance is delivered.
  • A presupposition is taken for granted. More pragmatically interesting presuppositions are those things “taken for granted” that might be false.
  • In pragmatic terms, the most remarkable presuppositions have social immediacy.
  • Use the presupposition negation test to verify whether something is a presupposition or something else, like a linguistic entailment.
  • A pragmatist uses various linguistic cues to identify presuppositions, such as definitive descriptions, questions, factive verbs, iteratives, and temporal clauses.

What are ‘presuppositions‘ in our language? What is the meaning of presuppositions, how do they work and how can they be used as a weapon of influence? Read further and find out everything about this NLP technique…

What are presuppositions? It boils down to something already pre-supposes through certain words in your message, while the focus on a different part of the message is located. As a result, the presupposition slips past the critical resistance.

This way you can bring things the way you want them to, while it seems as if it was established a long time ago or as if it is just a truth.

“That is of course the journalistic question: Mr. Rutte, when did you stop hitting your wife? And then the answer must be: never.”

– Mark Rutte who shows that he is aware of ambiguous presuppositions in language

What is the difference between a presupposition and an assumption?

These terms largely mean the same. Both mean: assume or accept something . You can also say: an assumption or a presupposition is a standard starting point that is being accepted.

There is, however, a small difference: for assumptions are also a way of implying things. It is therefore an active influencing technique.

With presuppositions, you influence someone’s internal representations in an indirect way.

Presuppositions are assumptions and implications in our language

presuppositions in our language

Making an assumption is very powerful as an influencing tool. So presuppositions are very powerful for your communication. Presuppositions are the linguistic versions of classical implications and assumptions .

You basically set a trap for your thoughts with presuppositions, for example towards a positive message. In this way, everything about the milton model is a presupposition.

The beauty of presuppositions? You get past a lot of bickering by presupposing things.

If you recognize presuppositions in the language, you listen very carefully to the assumptions in the language of the other: the assumptions in the sentences reveal a lot of information about the way in which the person structures his internal world of experience.

You can also use presuppositions to suggest change. The hearer accepts the assumptions through the power of presuppositions.

An example of presuppositions

In fact, presuppositions are in every sentence you say. Let’s take the following sentence:

If the cat meows again, I’ll have to put it outside.

From the above sentence you can derive the following implications:

  • There is a cat: ‘the cat’
  • The cat is inside: ‘have to put outside’
  • The cat has meowed before: ‘again’
  • It is a male: ‘he’
  • The cat can meow: ‘meow’

Dale Carnegie taught us the power of implication by asking questions

framing

With questions you prevent an authoritarian attitude. You can easily use this effective coaching and leadership technique. “Do you feel this as something you understand?” “Would you like to tell me what’s going on?” “How do you like the cleanliness of your desk?” The implication is clear that someone has to tidy up his desk, while he himself comes up with the idea / conclusion See also the anecdote below by Dale Carnegie:

Instead of pushing his people to accelerate their work and rush the

order through, he called everybody together, explained the situation

to them, and told them how much it would mean to the company

and to them if they could make it possible to produce the order on

time. Then he started asking questions:

“Is there anything we can do to handle this order?”

“Can anyone think of different ways to process it through the shop

that will make it possible to take the order?”

“Is there any way to adjust our hours or personnel assignments that

would help?”

The employees came up with many ideas and insisted that he take

the order. They approached it with a “We can do it” attitude, and the

order was accepted, produced and delivered on time.

An effective leader will use …

Principle 4 – Ask questions instead of giving direct orders.[1]

Carnegie also taught us to subtly lead by example

For the first few days of the work, when Mrs. Jacob returned from

her job, she noticed that the yard was strewn with the cut ends of

lumber. She didn’t want to antagonize the builders, because they did

excellent work. So after the workers had gone home, she and her

children picked up and neatly piled all the lumber debris in a corner.

The following morning she called the foreman to one side and said,

“I’m really pleased with the way the front lawn was left last night; it

is nice and clean and does not offend the neighbors.” From that day

forward the workers picked up and piled the debris to one side, and

the foreman came in each day seeking approval of the condition the

lawn was left in after a day’s work.[2]

Other Classic Implications

  • “Is that door still open?” The implication is that you want someone to close the door.
  • Dressing implies that you are a good coach who has important business people as a client.
  • If you’ve just met someone, you can say “Hey, I can finally get out of the phone” to imply that you’re an important person whose time is precious.

Instead of asking for a signature, put a book and pen on the table. “Is the implication clear?”
– Milton Erickson

The power of presuppositions: you draw attention to an irrelevant part or detail

The point to argue or resist is diverted to something unimportant thanks to these presuppositions. Let’s look at some examples:

  • “The man is running fast”. The bit to resist is now about running fast instead of running or not, because that is presented as a given.
  • “How many pieces of each kind did Moses take in the ark?” In this sense, attention is drawn to the question of how many animals were taken on the ark. Thus, it is no longer noticed that it was actually Noah’s ark, and not Moses.
  • When you order something from a restaurant they ask, “What would you like to drink?” Most people’s eyes then immediately go to the menu to order something. Compare that with “Would you like something to drink?” Or even worse: “No drink?”
  • “Do you want me to read you a story after you put on your pajamas?” The only choice for the child is whether or not he wants a story. Putting on the pajamas is certain.
  • In therapy with a child who is afraid of monsters under his bed, “What color are the monsters?”
    Instead of, “Are there any monsters? Can you see them? Are you sad? What’s the problem? Etc.”
  • Are you curious about your now developing trance state?
  • Are you DEEP in a trance?
  • Shall I tell you something cool about your dreaming arm?
  • I don’t need to know the details of how to get {desired outcome}.
  • “Before we embark on this new and exciting journey, we should pay attention …”
    Implies that the (new and exciting) journey is taking place at all and that it is new and exciting.
  • A mother who is bragging in the kitchen and wants her child to eat: “Grab the plate with 2 hands.” In this sentence, you put a lot of detail and emphasis on the last part of the sentence. As a result, the other person is very consciously processing the command to take the plate with two hands. Additionally, if this person declines the command to use two hands, he must make another effort to also decline accepting the board at all. If the sentence consisted only of “Grab the plate” all conscious attention was focused on that and could be rejected. Precise instructions also have the effect of turning off the other person’s mind. You no longer have to think about it yourself thanks to the extensive guidance.

Ask yourself: What is the question I can ask that, by the nature of the premise in the question, will cause the client to go through the greatest amount of change by having to accept the premise inherent in the question? For example: “What is the emotion you feel that makes you more yourself now?”

The flashlight effect: what do you emphasize so that other things are ignored?

If you shine light on a certain aspect with a flashlight, other aspects will no longer receive attention. So there will be no resistance to those other aspects that will no longer receive attention.

Take the sentence: ‘Pete drove home quickly’. By emphasizing different words in this sentence, you change the presuppositions you communicate. It just depends on what you shine your flashlight on:

  • “Piet drove home quickly.” Now it’s about who went home. All other information is taken as a given.
  • “Piet drove home quickly.” Now it is about how Piet went home. All other information is taken as a given.
  • “Piet drove home quickly .” Now it is about how Piet drove home. All other information is taken as a given.
  • Piet drove quickly home . ” Now it is about where Piet went. All other information is taken as a given.

Below you will find practical examples of this, applied to ‘I do my administration without pleasure and ease …’

  • Will it be at home where you will be enjoying your administration, or will it be in a different location where this will happen?
  • What do you think will be the first result of enjoying doing your administration simply?
  • I would be really surprised if there were someone in this room who has as many capabilities as you do to do administration with pleasure and simplicity.
  • Do you expect that you will experience just as much pleasure and ease with other tasks  as with doing your administration?
  • Will you recognize that you do your administration with pleasure and ease, or do you think it will happen unconsciously?
  • Do you think that you will only do your administration with more pleasure and ease? Do you think that alone will shift, or do you think it will also improve your efficiency?
  • Would you like to continue doing your administration simply?
  • I wonder … is that easy that you ‘ll be experiencing when doing your paperwork, something you already previously have experienced? “
  • After you have experienced ease and pleasure in doing your administration, will you feel surprised or proud?
  • If you were in someone change those records can not easily do, would not that be weird? (This implies that he / she currently does  someone already can do with ease and pleasure administration).
  • It is pretty good in that you are the capabilities have  to do your administration easy, is not it? (Whether or not he / she thinks it works out is not important … as long as it presupposes the outcome, which has now flown under the radar!)
  • If you didn’t have the capacity to do your administration easily, you wouldn’t have had the capacity to get out of bed in the morning. (If the other were to say that it has nothing to do with it, then the premise is successful: that the other already has the capabilities. There is a discussion about an ‘irrelevant’ part of that statement.)

Questions also help:

  • Do you think that you will be the first to notice that you are going to do your administration easily, or that you will be the first to notice that you are going to enjoy your administration? Or both at the same time?
  • Marie, were you not aware of the strategy you (currently) have for simple tasks such as administration?
  • Marie, I wonder if you don’t already feel a sense of ease and pleasure with your administration that you are not aware of yet?
  • I wonder if you are still not good at simple administration. (I wonder if he still is not a smart person ‘presupposes that I think he’s a smart person.)

How are the above examples structured? There are specific techniques for this. Let’s take a look at these techniques one by one below …

Presupposition by implying existence

  • “The chair is in the room.”
    The chair and the room exist.
  • “I have an appointment with my boyfriend at 19:00.”
    I have a friend. He exists. It is a boy.
  • “I don’t know if I can practice all this at home.”
    I have a house.
  • “You just have to write down your best examples.”
    You have a lot of examples!
  • “I know you want to tell so many but you only have to / are allowed to tell 1.”
    You have a lot to say.
  • “HSP doesn’t just have advantages.”
    There are advantages to HSP.

Also, the existence of something or someone can be implied through tonality:

  • The armed robber took the money (so there is also an unarmed robber somewhere …).

Presuppose by telling things as fact

  • “In a moment I’m going to touch your hand, and then your hand is slowly moving up towards your face.”

Presuppose by the word ‘more’: an already positive starting point ‘improve’

This implies that something is already there.

  • As you discover that you are becoming even more enthusiastic (suppose you are already learning) about what I am saying, there is no need to  discover / notice / find  that you are growing even more in your strong desire to learn more.
  • You can feel more and more peaceful.

In the example above, a loop has also been created: the more you discover the value of what I say, and the more you discover how enthusiastic it makes you, the more enthusiastic you can become that you know that, and it keeps going listen, or watch, or read.

  • “Burger King unique? You could even say it is delicious! ” The premise here is that Burger King is unique.
  • You can do this even better.
  • Tomorrow you will be able to learn even more.
  • How can I help you make your experience a little better today? (Instead of: problem solving).
  • Do you know someone who learns even faster than you?
  • Do you want to gain even more confidence?

Presuppose by taking action

  • Just do one part of an activity so that the other half remains for the other person. Instead of telling. For example, if you want the other person to close the left window, then you already close the right window.
  • I always apply this when I’ve met someone somewhere, an hour has passed and I actually want to go home. I know the other has come by train and I say, “Let’s walk to the station already.”  Either I already grab my coat or I already shake the hand of the other person. Because of this there is a kind of ‘knowing’ that the agreement is coming to an end, without me having made it explicit. I skipped that effort to communicate that!

Instead of asking for a signature, put a book and pen on the table. “Is the implication clear?”
– Milton Erickson

The ‘we’ premise

  • Let’s together …
    Here “we” is implying it’s not you against them.

Leadership premise

This implies that you are the leader / the one in power, between the two of you.

  • Follow me.
  • Join the group.
  • Join me.

Implicit privilege (presuppose privilege) instead of ‘selling’ something

Presuppositions

Do you hope someone will do something for you or buy something from you? Then change the frame so that it has nothing to do with ‘selling’ anymore, but that it is a privilege to be allowed to do it.

So use the words below instead of: Sell, buy …

  • You may.
  • Perhaps.
  • If you are lucky.
  • If you are lucky you may be allowed to volunteer.
  • You may have the pleasure / pleasure of helping me.
  • Perhaps you will get the honor of being interviewed briefly.
  • Carlo, I would like to offer you a question.
  • Don’t be mad at me if you don’t get elected …
  • Happy.
  • You may even
  • To discover.
  • To learn.
  • Share.
  • Secret.
  • Tell a story.
  • Opportunity. “Now you all get the chance to make such beautiful sentences with presuppositions.”
  • Trip.
  • Breakthrough.
  • Discovery.
  • I’m going to share something with you.
  • I share a discovery.
  • Trip.
  • Breakthrough.

I thank you

  • I thank you (good reputation they are going to live up to) for allowing me to discover this for you.
  • Thank you for giving me the bottle, how sweet!
  • Thank you for wanting to stay another half hour!
  • Is your audience quiet and do you want to make them clap? Presume their enthusiasm with a ‘thank you’: ‘Thank you for being so enthusiastic!’ Then the audience starts to clap.

Why

  • Why are you {positive outcome}?
  • Why are you so assertive?
  • Why are you so good at running your business?
  • What is your reason for participating?

I think it is… that you are going to do {desired result}

  • I like that you do another dance with me!
  • Nice that you announced that you are now going to recite a sonnet!
  • I think it is very noble of you that you are going to return that found wallet to its owner.
  • How nice that you are also coming out with us!
  • It’s great that you can change!

Do you like it … that {desired outcome}

  • Do you mind that you have learned so much in your life?
  • Do you think it’s cool that you are so good at being on time?
  •  “Are you enjoying it?” In response to, “Are you flirting with me?”

Ordinal Presuppositions (Time)

Several things are going to happen and it mainly implies the order of what is going to happen:
Before, after, while, before, when, first, before, as soon as, start, end, yet, no more, round, stop, start, all , next one…

  • After we…
  • Before we…
  • Before sharing that bottle with me, it’s very important that you shake it a bit. That tastes better.
  • Would you like a drink before we start?
  • “Call us tomorrow to tell us what the next step is / how you want to proceed.” Instead of: “Call us tomorrow to tell us if you agree with the offer.”
  • “The fifth result you got is …”
  • “What’s the next thing you are going to learn?” Presupposed: You have already learned at least something.
  • “What do you want to do after you are motivated?”
  • “After you have experienced ease and pleasure doing your administration, will you feel surprised or proud?
  • Swapping ‘is’ and ‘was’: what was your problem (instead of what is your problem) presupposes that the problem is gone.
  • A very powerful one is “already”: You are already doing it. Your confidence is already growing. It has already been set in motion. Note that things are already changing.
  • “The first thing we’re going to do is …”
  • “Get rid of all the last traces of that feeling.” This implies that it is almost gone.
  • “At the end of the performance, you can turn on your cell phones again.” This implies that the mobile phones must be turned off before the performance.
  • “I will never go to Burger King again!” The premise is that I’ve been to Burger King before.
  • “You are still listening to me.”
  • “The first thing I’ll tell you before we’re done  and you start using those learned things in your daily life is that…” (implies we’re going to finish it and she’s going to use her skills).
  • You are not a member yet.
  • Before you gently focus on …
  • Let’s discuss something before you finish your project.
  • Have you noticed that your subconscious has already begun to learn?
  • Have you noticed the wonderful effect this painting has on your living room?
  • A lawyer could say in court. “Have you already stopped beating your wife?”
  • Stop …
  • Not anymore…
  • You can continue to relax.
  • Are you still interested in NLP?
  • Before we go …
  • Before you realize how powerful that is …
  • Before you quickly discover how much you enjoy learning with me …
  • After we do / your xyz …
  • After you have signed the contract in the way that is best for you …
  • After you’ve decided to hire me, we can talk about the soccer game.
  • “Have you already started coaching?” “Do you want me to stop?”
  • You are already growing.
  • “Are you going to flirt with me?” “Have already started.”
  • They lived in a large house by the sea. How lucky they are now.
  • If the cat goes sleeves again, I have to take him outside.
  • Ever since you got so good at this sport, everyone looked up to you.

To mix up time

  • It was a terrible problem, wasn’t it?
  • You want to change and you already have, haven’t you?
  • What would it be like if you made these choices now?
  • Go in and try to have the same problem in vain.
  • You can change your mind … Haven’t you already?
  • So you had a hard time saying no, which exhausted yourself and in the long run you couldn’t take care of all the people and your family and have no impact on them. Is not that what you always have done?
  • Yes, really annoying problem you had .

Adjectives and adverbs

  • “Would you like a nice cup of coffee?” Herein ‘tasty’ is the premise.
  • Can I ask a business question?
  • May I give you a special compliment?
  • Can I have a sweet cup of tea?
  • Fortunately, quickly, soon, only. “Fortunately the chairs are in the back of the room today.” All words here are presuppositions. “Happy” also implies privilege.
  • Will you suddenly gain confidence tomorrow?
  • Fortunately you can learn well, aren’t you?
  • Don’t you think your confidence is exceptional?

How…

‘How’ implies that something is going to happen. The only question is how that will happen, and no longer whether it will happen.

  • How / in what way is it different now?
  • How glad are you to see me?
  • And how will you learn all of these NLP skills?
  • How do you know that {the suggestion you want to sneak in}?
  • How will you use your new skills in the future?
  • How soon will success be visible?
  • How often do you go to the hairdresser?
  • How else would you go into a trance?
  • I wonder how easily you can do this …
  • How surprised will you be when you find yourself using these tips tomorrow?
  • How is it different now?
  • How do you like it? That it no longer works?
  • How high is your self-confidence?
  • What I was always curious about: how heavy is such a bottle that you are about to share with me?
  • Ask a question assuming that the goal has been achieved: how much better is {situation}? (You can find more such questions in the article on future pacing and coaching questions.

Suggestions with open ends

  • We all have potential that we are unaware of, and we don’t normally know how that will be expressed.
  • It’s not right for me to tell him what to learn. Let him learn what he wants, and the way he wants it.

It’s good that you …

  • It’s good that you’re so open and learning a lot of new skills, and that’s how you keep moving forward.
  • Isn’t it nice to know that your confidence will be available to you in the future?
  • Not happy that you can show self-confidence?

What…

  • What will change? (This implies that something is going to change.)
  • What do you want to drink? (This is used in restaurants.)
  • What fun activity will we do today?

Which (and double binds)

  • What beautiful thoughts do you have? (Instead of, what are you thinking now?)
  • In therapy with a child who is afraid of monsters under his bed, “What color are the monsters?”
    Instead of, “Are there any monsters? Can you see them? Are you sad? What’s the problem? Etc.”
  • Which is the easiest to learn? Verbal or non-verbal skills?
  • What results have you gotten?
  • What wonderful thoughts do you all have?
  • Is it your skills that you feel most confident about, or is it something else?

Read more about double bonds here.

Draw attention to an explanation for what is presupposed

  • “It’s probably because of your intelligence that makes you so good at learning.” Presupposed: You can learn well. And something takes care of that.
  • “It’s probably the sophistication of NLP that gives it such good results.” Presupposed: Something about NLP produces results.

Implicating consciousness (through unspecified verbs)

‘Notice’ is one of the unspecified verbs that also presuppose something. It implies that the experience is going to happen in any case, and that it only needs to be noticed. You bring the focus to something.

  • Note that …
  • Notice what happens as that picture comes out more.
  • Notice how welcome that is.
  • Notice how the situation is already transforming. Notice how it is different now.
  • Notice the changes in your internal experience …
  • Notice the difference.
  • Notice how inclined you are to move to your seat … be it fast or at a more relaxed pace … now …
  • Did you notice the difference from yesterday?
  • If you want a group to stop just an exercise during a workout: “You notice that the exercise is being completed.”
  • Are you aware that you are already doing this? Naturally…
  • You can feel the love.
  • Can you see that I am thinking it all up spontaneously?
  • Realize how badly you want it.
  • Do you realize that too?
  • Have you realized that yet?
  • Chris, do you realize you’re working against me?
  • In a moment you’re going to realize / You realize you’ve always done this naturally, and now it’s just about figuring out how.
  • You don’t have to acknowledge it … It will just keep developing itself within you.
  • I wonder … is the ease you will experience doing your administration something you have experienced before?
  • I’m not sure you’re aware of the temperature in your feet right now …
  • Enjoy the fact that …
  • Do you enjoy the results you got?
  • Feel …
  • Hear…
  • See… Can you see that… See that?
  • Smell…
  • Taste …
  • Other unspecified verbs: I know that, I understand that, notice that.
  • You can be aware that you can relax … Now …
  • While you allow your ‘threshold of perception’ to lower ( sensory acumen ) (meanwhile lowering it with your hands too), and you can look above it … what does the world look like now?
  • “Since you’re seeing this as a limitation now, I wonder …” (He / she sees it as a limitation only).

You can also frame all sensory perceptible things as presupposition. It’s already there – just see, hear or feel it:

  • “Do you hear him?”
  • If you indirectly want to make it clear to a DJ that the music can be turned on: “I think I can already hear the music …”

Implicating repetition

This implies that it once happened.

  • Her-
  • We are going to rediscover how you develop focus.

Exclusive / inclusive

  • Of…
  • And…

Who / that / who

  • “The results which you get with NLP, are impressive.” Presupposed: NLP delivers results.
  • “If the confidence which you experience as a surprise to you?” Presupposed: You experience self-confidence.
  • “I can’t help it that the burnout will soon disappear.”

Presuppose gender

  • The new president will have to do her very best to …

Implicit premise

A sentence does not literally have to be a presupposition. In the example below, the focus is simply shifted to the second part of the sentence, causing the first part of the sentence to slip in between.

  • He can play football very well, but he can hide that very well.

Practicing with assumptions

  1. A presents a simple result that he / she wants to achieve, with few words. For example, “Be confident in giving presentations.” Or “Eat healthier.”
  2. B uses different assumption patterns to presuppose the result.
  3. B & C pay close attention to the following:
    – Did B use the intended pattern?
    – Did B presume the result with that pattern?
    – B & C calibrate non-verbally to note: Did the premise invite A to process or re-sort things from within? Did A step into the result or did A experience some other kind of shift? Did A accept or reject the premise?

These were the finest examples and techniques of presuppositions

These were all possible variations of presuppositions.

[1] (Carnegie, 1931)

[2] (Carnegie, 1931)

 

Related: also read this…

As a communicator, wouldn’t it be great if people accepted what you said without question sometimes? Linguistic presuppositions are the most powerful of the Meta model and Milton model language patterns.

A favorite with parents is to say “Do you want to go to bed now or in 30 minutes” There is an illusion of choice, but both choices get your outcome. Of course, as we get older and smarter we see through some of the illusions (or do we?)

Unfortunately, this power can be used for bad things as well as good. We probably have no idea of the kinds of things we take for granted in order to make sense of someone’s communication or to create a well-formed sentence.

They can also take away our sense of choice when we use them on ourselves, or others use them. We can feel painted into a corner. “Have you stopped being so noisy?” “Have you learned to control your temper yet?” When did you get so bossy?”

Existence

This is the simplest kind of presupposition.

  • Barry ate the hamburger. This presupposes a being called Barry and a hamburger exist. We accept these things and our focus is on the action of eating. Barry and the hamburger are in the background.

Linguistic Presuppositions of Awareness

Here we are not questioning the second part of the sentence. This is a useful pattern

  • Do you realize you are the first person to get all the questions correct? There is no question of correctness, just whether you realize.
  • You may notice a small icon in the top right corner. There is an icon; you just have to find it.
  • Are you aware you are already in trance? You are in trance; you just need to be aware of it.

take-out-garbageLinguistic Presuppositions of Time

This includes the use of time or change of time words like begin, end, before, after, during, begin, end, future, when, again, still and soon.

Tense type words like was, had, been, went (past tense), am, have, are, stop, start, continue (present tense) will, going, getting (future) can create powerful assumptions.

  • Would you mind taking the garbage out before you pick up Billy? You are picking up Billy.
  • Are you still drinking? You have been drinking; the only question is whether you have stopped.
  • I saw her at the school again. She has been at the school previously.

Linguistic Presuppositions of Order

When we use words like first, once, second, twice, last, another, again, next, we are presupposing a series of things.

  • My second husband is very funny. This presupposes a first husband.
  • My first husband liked baseball. This presupposes number one is no longer a husband, that there are future husband/s, or that she intends to get married again sometime. Using ordinal words can be insightful like this – often the person is using them unconsciously – she may not consciously consider remarrying.

Exclusive or

Here we exclude one thing or the other.

  • Would you like white or whole meal? You are getting a sandwich.
  • Would you prefer one year’s hosting or quarterly? You are getting hosting.

Inclusive or

Here there is a perceived sense of choice without really having it.

  • Do you want to pay for this now or when you pick it up? There is no question of payment.
  • Do you want to have your bath before dinner or after? You are going to have a bath, just a matter of when.

Adverbs and Adjectives

This is Ly adverbs and descriptive words presupposing certain qualities. Words like just, only, even. Just can be particularly insidious, discounting effort and talent, but also making things appear simple and easy.

  • It’s just about perseverance. Is perseverance really a simple thing?
  • She is just a homemaker. Dismisses and discounts this role.
  • It was a wonderful day. You enjoyed something about the day.
  • My friend is as cheerful as her mother is. Apart from the existence of the friend and her mother, we don’t question the mother’s cheerfulness.
  • Even my dog knows that. Presupposes she is not very smart.

Meta Model Recovery Questions

  • How specifically do you know that?

As a communicator, wouldn’t it be great if people accepted what you said without question sometimes? Linguistic presuppositions are the most powerful of the Meta model and Milton model language patterns.

A favorite with parents is to say “Do you want to go to bed now or in 30 minutes” There is an illusion of choice, but both choices get your outcome. Of course, as we get older and smarter we see through some of the illusions (or do we?)

Unfortunately, this power can be used for bad things as well as good. We probably have no idea of the kinds of things we take for granted in order to make sense of someone’s communication or to create a well-formed sentence.

They can also take away our sense of choice when we use them on ourselves, or others use them. We can feel painted into a corner. “Have you stopped being so noisy?” “Have you learned to control your temper yet?” When did you get so bossy?”

Existence

This is the simplest kind of presupposition.

  • Barry ate the hamburger. This presupposes a being called Barry and a hamburger exist. We accept these things and our focus is on the action of eating. Barry and the hamburger are in the background.

Linguistic Presuppositions of Awareness

Here we are not questioning the second part of the sentence. This is a useful pattern

  • Do you realize you are the first person to get all the questions correct? There is no question of correctness, just whether you realize.
  • You may notice a small icon in the top right corner. There is an icon; you just have to find it.
  • Are you aware you are already in trance? You are in trance; you just need to be aware of it.

take-out-garbageLinguistic Presuppositions of Time

This includes the use of time or change of time words like begin, end, before, after, during, begin, end, future, when, again, still and soon.

Tense type words like was, had, been, went (past tense), am, have, are, stop, start, continue (present tense) will, going, getting (future) can create powerful assumptions.

  • Would you mind taking the garbage out before you pick up Billy? You are picking up Billy.
  • Are you still drinking? You have been drinking; the only question is whether you have stopped.
  • I saw her at the school again. She has been at the school previously.

Linguistic Presuppositions of Order

When we use words like first, once, second, twice, last, another, again, next, we are presupposing a series of things.

  • My second husband is very funny. This presupposes a first husband.
  • My first husband liked baseball. This presupposes number one is no longer a husband, that there are future husband/s, or that she intends to get married again sometime. Using ordinal words can be insightful like this – often the person is using them unconsciously – she may not consciously consider remarrying.

Exclusive or

Here we exclude one thing or the other.

  • Would you like white or whole meal? You are getting a sandwich.
  • Would you prefer one year’s hosting or quarterly? You are getting hosting.

Inclusive or

Here there is a perceived sense of choice without really having it.

  • Do you want to pay for this now or when you pick it up? There is no question of payment.
  • Do you want to have your bath before dinner or after? You are going to have a bath, just a matter of when.

Adverbs and Adjectives

This is Ly adverbs and descriptive words presupposing certain qualities. Words like just, only, even. Just can be particularly insidious, discounting effort and talent, but also making things appear simple and easy.

  • It’s just about perseverance. Is perseverance really a simple thing?
  • She is just a homemaker. Dismisses and discounts this role.
  • It was a wonderful day. You enjoyed something about the day.
  • My friend is as cheerful as her mother is. Apart from the existence of the friend and her mother, we don’t question the mother’s cheerfulness.
  • Even my dog knows that. Presupposes she is not very smart.

Meta Model Recovery Questions

  • How specifically do you know that?

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Is personification a word
  • Is prestigious a word
  • Is persistence a word
  • Is presently a word
  • Is preferable a word