If you’re anything like us, you enjoy discovering new terms. Although we find many words interesting, our word of the day is “deprecated.” What does this term mean, and where did it come from? We’ll tell you.
Read on to get the scoop on the word deprecated. By the end of this post, you should better understand what deprecated means and even feel comfortable using it in a sentence.
If you’re ready to enhance your overall vocabulary by learning a new word — keep reading!
What Is the Definition of the Word Deprecated?
When learning a new word, it can be especially helpful to review several definitions instead of just one before deciding what it means. To begin our journey in understanding the word deprecated, we’ve gathered a few definitions from three trusted dictionaries for you to check out below:
- The Cambridge Dictionary says the verb deprecate means not approving of something or saying that you do not approve of something.
- When used as a noun, Dictionary.com defines deprecation as the act or process of expressing earnest disapproval.
- According to the Collins Dictionary, if you deprecate something, you criticize it.
After reviewing the above definitions, we can conclude that deprecation is expressing disapproval of something or belittling someone.
Although this is our word of the day’s most well-known definition, it should be noted that when used in the IT industry, deprecated has another meaning.
Not to be confused with depreciation — the monetary devaluation of goods over time — deprecation is a common computer term primarily used in software engineering and programming to indicate that the use of a certain software feature or programming language feature has been superseded.
What Are Translations of Deprecated?
If you have your passport in hand and are curious about how to properly use the word “deprecated” during your travels, boy, do we have you covered! Below you will find a list of translations in various languages around the world for the word deprecated:
- Catalan — disapproval
- Chinese — 弃用
- Macedonian — заостанато
- Korean — 더 이상 사용되지 않는
- Irish — neamhchláraithe
- Greek — apórripsi
- Portuguese — desaprovado, desfavorecido, obsoleto, or descontinuado
- German — veraltet, obsolet or überholt
- Dutch — afgekeurd or verouderd
What Are the Synonyms and Antonyms of Deprecated?
To help you further grasp the meaning behind deprecated, we completed a list of similar words and words that hold an opposite meaning to the word of the day — deprecated.
Reference these word lists from Power Thesaurus to learn both synonyms and antonyms of deprecated.
Synonyms
- Tutted about
- Deplore
- Abhor
- Take exception to
- Detest
- Written off
- Vilipend
- Taken down
- Disparage
- Scorn
- Poor mouthed
- Aspersion
- Devalue
- Belittle
- Despise
- Take a dim view of
- Depreciate
- Trash talked
- Undervalue
- Animadverted on
- Derogate
- Thought little of
- Not gone for
- Badmouth
- Detract
- Cut down to size
- Disesteem
- Slagged off
- Denigration
- Object
- Pulled to pieces
- Wrote off
- Frown
- Vituperate against
- Disfavor
- Scoffed at
- Ridicule
Antonyms
- Gushed over
- Approve
- Spoke highly of
- Acclaim
- Face it
- Rhapsodize about
- Esteem
- Praised to the skies
- Commend
- Increase
- Du jor
- Approbate
- Paid homage to
- Appreciate
- Gone on about
- Countenance
- Be big on
- Applaud
- Put on a pedestal
- Boost
- Modern-day
- New fashioned
- State of the art
- Fortify
- Hype
- Exaggerated the worth of
- Heighten
Origin of Deprecate
The origin of the verb deprecated dates back to the 1620s — defined here as deliverance from or to pray against. Deriving from Latin deprecatus, the past participle of deprecari.
Deprecari (meaning to pray away) was formed from de– (away) and precari (to pray). It was not until a touch later in the 1640s that deprecated was used to mean “urge against,” or “to express disapproval.”
Examples of Deprecated in a Sentence
Since we have covered just about everything there is to know about the word deprecated, why don’t we shift our attention to how to properly use our word of the day in a sentence. Quiz yourself to see how many unique sentences you can come up with using the word deprecated.
A little unsure, or just love learning? Check out these examples we have listed below:
Some may very well deprecate it, but clearly, they do not see its potential here.
After the most recent redesign of our app, all of the deprecated APIs have been removed.
I hope Sandy could get the list of the deprecated methods and components I left on her desk yesterday.
I hope some form of backward compatibility is offered for Android even if the iOs Cortana apps are rapidly being deprecated.
Are you aware that as programmers, we only have a limited amount of time to rectify all deprecated functions on top of all of the deprecated features?
Bottom Line
In short, to deprecate something means to diminish something or show disapproval of something or someone. Essentially if you hear someone was deprecated, it is safe to assume that person was made to feel unimportant and was shown an utter lack of disrespect.
Source:
- Deprecate synonyms Words and Phrases for Deprecate | Power Thesaurus
- Deprecated | definition | The Cambridge English Dictionary
- English Dictionary Definition Deprecate | Collins Dictionary
- Deprecate Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
Kevin Miller is a growth marketer with an extensive background in Search Engine Optimization, paid acquisition and email marketing. He is also an online editor and writer based out of Los Angeles, CA. He studied at Georgetown University, worked at Google and became infatuated with English Grammar and for years has been diving into the language, demystifying the do’s and don’ts for all who share the same passion! He can be found online here.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In several fields, especially computing, deprecation is the discouragement of use of some terminology, feature, design, or practice, typically because it has been superseded or is no longer considered efficient or safe, without completely removing it or prohibiting its use. Typically, deprecated materials are not completely removed to ensure legacy compatibility or back up practice in case new methods are not functional in an odd scenario.
It can also imply that a feature, design, or practice will be removed or discontinued entirely in the future.[1]
Etymology[edit]
In general English usage, the infinitive «to deprecate» means «to express disapproval of (something)». It derives from the Latin verb deprecari, meaning «to ward off (a disaster) by prayer».
An early documented usage of «deprecate» in this sense is in Usenet posts in 1984, referring to obsolete features in 4.2BSD and the C programming language.[2] An expanded definition of «deprecate» was cited in the Jargon File in its 1991 revision,[3] and similar definitions are found in commercial software documentation from 2014[1] and 2023.[4]
Software[edit]
While a deprecated software feature remains in the software, its use may raise warning messages recommending alternative practices. Deprecated status may also indicate the feature will be removed in the future. Features are deprecated, rather than immediately removed, to provide backward compatibility and to give programmers time to bring affected code into compliance with the new standard.
Among the most common reasons for deprecation are:
- The feature has been replaced by a more powerful alternative feature. For instance, the Linux kernel contains two modules to communicate with Windows networks:
smbfs
andcifs
. The latter provides better security, supports more protocol features, and integrates better with the rest of the kernel. Since the inclusion ofcifs
,smbfs
has been deprecated.[5] - The feature contains a design flaw, frequently a security flaw, and so should be avoided, but existing code depends upon it. The simple C standard function
gets()
is an example, because using this function can introduce a buffer overflow into the program that uses it.[6] The Java API methodsThread.stop
,.suspend
and.resume
are further examples.[7] - The feature is considered extraneous, and will be removed in the future in order to simplify the system as a whole. Early versions of the Web markup language HTML included a
FONT
element to allow page designers to specify the font in which text should be displayed. With the release of Cascading Style Sheets and HTML 4.0, theFONT
element became extraneous, and detracted from the benefits of noting structural markup in HTML and graphical formatting in CSS. Thus, theFONT
element was deprecated in the Transitional HTML 4.0 standard, and eliminated in the Strict variant.[8] - A future version of the software will make major structural changes, making it impossible (or impractical) to support older features. For instance, when Apple Inc. planned the transition from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X, it created a subset of the older system’s API which would support most programs with minor changes: the Carbon library (that has since been deprecated), available in both Mac OS 9 and Mac OS X. Programmers who were, at the time, chiefly using Mac OS 9, could ensure that their programs would run natively on Mac OS X by using only the API functions supported in Carbon. Other Mac OS 9 functions were deprecated, and were never supported natively in Mac OS X.[9]
- Standardization or increased consistency in naming. Projects that are developed over long periods of time, or by multiple individuals or groups, can contain inconsistencies in the naming of various items. These might result from a lack of foresight, changes in nomenclature over time, or personal, regional, or educational differences in terminology. Since merely renaming an item would break backwards compatibility, the existing name must be left in place. The original name will likely remain indefinitely, but will be deprecated to encourage use of the newer, more consistent naming convention. An example would be an API that alternately used the spelling «color» and «colour». Standardization would result in the use of only one of the regional spellings throughout, and all occurrences of the other spelling would be deprecated.
- A feature that once was available only independently is now combined with its co-feature. An example is VLC Media Player; VLC used to stand for «VideoLan Client», and a separate «VideoLan Server» was available as its co-feature. Both the client and server became available in the same package and so getting one independently would be impractical.[10]
Other usage[edit]
A building code example is the use of ungrounded («2-prong») electrical receptacles. Over time, these older devices were widely deprecated in favor of safer grounded («3-prong») receptacles. The older, ungrounded receptacles were still permitted in many places by «grandfathering» them in existing electrical wiring, while prohibiting them for new installations. Thus, though ungrounded receptacles may still be available for legal purchase in a location where they are obsolete, they would generally be intended only for repairs to existing older electrical installations.
In writing and editing, usage of a word may be deprecated because it is ambiguous, confusing, or offensive to some readers. For example, the words sanction and inflammable may be misinterpreted because they have auto-antonymic or self-contradictory meanings; writing style guides often recommend substituting other words that are clearly understood and unambiguous. Some word usages that have acquired different connotations over time, such as gay or colored, may be deprecated as obsolete in formal writing.
In technical standards, use of a certain clause may be discouraged or superseded by new clauses. As an example, in the Ethernet standard IEEE 802.3-2012, Clause 5 (Layer Management) is «deprecated» by Clause 30 (Management), except for 5.2.4.
Deprecation may also occur when a technical term becomes obsolete, either through change or supersession. An example from paleontology is the previously deprecated term Brontosaurus; before being re-recognized as a unique genus,[11] it was considered a popular, yet deprecated, name for the genus Apatosaurus.[12] Some examples of deprecated terms from medicine include consumption (tuberculosis), grippe (influenza), and apoplexy (stroke). In chemical nomenclature, the international standards organization IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) has deprecated the term «methyl ethyl ketone», and now recommends using the term «ethyl methyl ketone» instead.[13]
See also[edit]
- Abandonware
- List of deprecated terms for diseases
- Obsolescence
- Orphaned technology
References[edit]
- ^ a b «JEP 277: Enhanced Deprecation». openjdk.java.net. Archived from the original on 19 September 2018. Retrieved 9 February 2018.
- ^ Shea, Ammon. «A New Meaning of ‘Deprecate’«. Words We’re Watching. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
- ^ Raymond, Eric S.; Steele, Guy L., eds. (July 1992). The Jargon File, Version 2.9.10. Retrieved 1 March 2023 – via Project Gutenberg.
- ^ Stewart, Meghan (27 February 2023). «Windows client features lifecycle». What’s new in Windows. Microsoft. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
- ^ «On the future of smbfs». LWN.net. 15 May 2006. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
- ^ GNU. «Line Input». The GNU C Library. GNU. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 2 August 2008.
Deprecated function: char * gets (char *s). … The
gets
function is very dangerous because it provides no protection against overflowing the strings
. The GNU library includes it for compatibility only. You should always usefgets
orgetline
instead. - ^ «Java Thread Primitive Deprecation». Oracle. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 13 May 2011.
- ^ Musciano, Chuck; Kennedy, Bill (2007). «HTML’s Obsolete Expanded Font Handling». HTML & XHTML : the definitive guide (6th ed.). Beijing: O’Reilly. ISBN 0-596-52732-2. OCLC 77574682.
- ^ Simenel, Éric (2000). «Carbonization 101». MacTech. Vol. 16, no. 12. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
- ^ «The cross-platform streaming solution». VideoLAN. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
- ^ «Brontosaurus Finally Validated as a Distinct Dinosaur». ABC News. Archived from the original on 9 April 2020. Retrieved 27 June 2020.
- ^ Upchurch, Paul; Barrett, Paul M.; Dodson, Peter (2004). «Sauropoda». In Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; Osmólska, Halszka (eds.). The Dinosauria (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 259–322. ISBN 0-520-24209-2.
- ^ Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry : IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Blue Book). Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry. 2014. p. 725. doi:10.1039/9781849733069-FP001. ISBN 978-0-85404-182-4.
External links[edit]
Look up deprecate in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Look up deprecation in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
- How and When To Deprecate APIs from the JDK 5.0 Documentation
- Detect deprecated functions A tool that discovers deprecated functions in any Windows native application or library.
-
#1
There are a lot of abbreviations used in the database, especially in the description of each channel and are not at all understandable. Some descriptions just mirror the tag, which, of course, has to be abbreviated. Where do these abbreviations come from? If someone finds out how a frequency is being used why do they enter abbreviations that are not understandable? The description column has enough space to have these abbreviations spelled out so there isn’t a need for them.
People use too many abbreviations when writing posts, but at least we have the opportunity to ask them what the heck they mean. For the database we don’t have this opportunity.
I have a bit of a problem with the use of the word «deprecated» as it is a computer science word. Although the word has some uses and definitions outside computer science it use is rare. I have seen several people try to use the word in posts and they misspell it with «depreciated» being the most frequent of these, and have even observed «decapitated!» The problem is not just the incorrect spelling, it is that so many people don’t even know the definition of the word. I’ve seen the word «deprecated» misspelled in the database and if I didn’t know the definition and proper use of the word, I would not be able to understand what is being conveyed. I Google search of the misspelled word does not result in the computer science definition of the word.
Deprecated really means «obsolete, don’t use anymore.» I had to look up the word when I first saw it as I had not seen it in my life up to that point. People who work in computer science have a language all their own and it is not one that is very well understood by people outside that profession. I have noticed that computer professionals often don’t communicate very well, leading to those infamous software instructions that no one understands.
Why can’t the word «obsolete» be used rather than the esoteric word «deprecated?» This is not a site of computer professionals trading tips.
Clear, easily interpreted words should be in use. Abbreviations and «deprecated» don’t accomplish that.
-
#2
There are a lot of abbreviations used in the database, especially in the description of each channel and are not at all understandable. Some descriptions just mirror the tag, which, of course, has to be abbreviated. Where do these abbreviations come from? If someone finds out how a frequency is being used why do they enter abbreviations that are not understandable? The description column has enough space to have these abbreviations spelled out so there isn’t a need for them.
People use too many abbreviations when writing posts, but at least we have the opportunity to ask them what the heck they mean. For the database we don’t have this opportunity.
I have a bit of a problem with the use of the word «deprecated» as it is a computer science word. Although the word has some uses and definitions outside computer science it use is rare. I have seen several people try to use the word in posts and they misspell it with «depreciated» being the most frequent of these, and have even observed «decapitated!» The problem is not just the incorrect spelling, it is that so many people don’t even know the definition of the word. I’ve seen the word «deprecated» misspelled in the database and if I didn’t know the definition and proper use of the word, I would not be able to understand what is being conveyed. I Google search of the misspelled word does not result in the computer science definition of the word.
Deprecated really means «obsolete, don’t use anymore.» I had to look up the word when I first saw it as I had not seen it in my life up to that point. People who work in computer science have a language all their own and it is not one that is very well understood by people outside that profession. I have noticed that computer professionals often don’t communicate very well, leading to those infamous software instructions that no one understands.
Why can’t the word «obsolete» be used rather than the esoteric word «deprecated?» This is not a site of computer professionals trading tips.
Clear, easily interpreted words should be in use. Abbreviations and «deprecated» don’t accomplish that.
I somewhat agree with this. Perhaps the term «expired» would be good. Coming from a CS / ECE background, I still consider deprecated a poor term for what it actually means in CS anyway. However, I do like the idea of people learning new words, too; for instance: how many people are about to look up «esoteric»? Haha
But yes, I think this would be a good place to start a healthy discussion on a term change. Again, I toss my vote in for expired (simply meaning invalid / out of date). Obsolete is good, too, however I have come across some terms labeled «deprecated» that are actually still in use (though in a very limited way, like emergency backup), which technically wouldn’t make them obsolete by definition.
Just my $0.02.
-
#3
"Deprecated"
I love «Deprecated».
Please keep it.
Try to work in «Porcine» too.
-
#4
With regards to descriptions can you give an example of something you don’t understand? The DB Admin guide has a standard set of abbreviations we are supposed to use.
Like it or not, abbreviations are nescessary due to scanners limiting the display field.
There are a lot of abbreviations used in the database, especially in the description of each channel and are not at all understandable. Some descriptions just mirror the tag, which, of course, has to be abbreviated. Where do these abbreviations come from? If someone finds out how a frequency is being used why do they enter abbreviations that are not understandable? The description column has enough space to have these abbreviations spelled out so there isn’t a need for them.
People use too many abbreviations when writing posts, but at least we have the opportunity to ask them what the heck they mean. For the database we don’t have this opportunity.
I have a bit of a problem with the use of the word «deprecated» as it is a computer science word. Although the word has some uses and definitions outside computer science it use is rare. I have seen several people try to use the word in posts and they misspell it with «depreciated» being the most frequent of these, and have even observed «decapitated!» The problem is not just the incorrect spelling, it is that so many people don’t even know the definition of the word. I’ve seen the word «deprecated» misspelled in the database and if I didn’t know the definition and proper use of the word, I would not be able to understand what is being conveyed. I Google search of the misspelled word does not result in the computer science definition of the word.
Deprecated really means «obsolete, don’t use anymore.» I had to look up the word when I first saw it as I had not seen it in my life up to that point. People who work in computer science have a language all their own and it is not one that is very well understood by people outside that profession. I have noticed that computer professionals often don’t communicate very well, leading to those infamous software instructions that no one understands.
Why can’t the word «obsolete» be used rather than the esoteric word «deprecated?» This is not a site of computer professionals trading tips.
Clear, easily interpreted words should be in use. Abbreviations and «deprecated» don’t accomplish that.
-
#5
I have a bit of a problem with the use of the word «deprecated» as it is a computer science word. Although the word has some uses and definitions outside computer science it use is rare. I have seen several people try to use the word in posts and they misspell it with «depreciated» being the most frequent of these, and have even observed «decapitated!» The problem is not just the incorrect spelling, it is that so many people don’t even know the definition of the word. I’ve seen the word «deprecated» misspelled in the database and if I didn’t know the definition and proper use of the word, I would not be able to understand what is being conveyed. I Google search of the misspelled word does not result in the computer science definition of the word.
Deprecated really means «obsolete, don’t use anymore.» I had to look up the word when I first saw it as I had not seen it in my life up to that point. People who work in computer science have a language all their own and it is not one that is very well understood by people outside that profession. I have noticed that computer professionals often don’t communicate very well, leading to those infamous software instructions that no one understands.
Why can’t the word «obsolete» be used rather than the esoteric word «deprecated?» This is not a site of computer professionals trading tips.
Clear, easily interpreted words should be in use. Abbreviations and «deprecated» don’t accomplish that.
Obsolete generally indicates that something is old, no longer in use, and should be avoided. Expired means out of date and no longer able to be used. Deprecated, on the other hand, indicates that something is old and while may still be in use should be moved away from when practical. Two very different concepts. Many of the frequencies flagged as deprecated are often still licensed and although may not be in regular use, are still in place as a back-up (or even as a back-up to a back-up).
One such example was demonstrated by the person giving me a tour of their EOC. Among the various radios in their racks were ones for their existing state-wide trunked system, ones for their recently discontinued VHF-Hi frequencies, and one old radio for their very old (but still licensed) VHF-Low frequency.
When I asked him about that radio he smiled and said it still worked but is only used on very rare occasions. I asked how often that was and he said «About once every other decade or so». He then admitted that he used to use that radio to play remote chess with his counterpart in an adjacent county up until that person retired a couple of years ago. He then chuckled and stated that it really wasn’t used for playing, but in reality, the chess game was simply the situation they used for their twice weekly «tests of the backup radio system». He then showed me the logs to «prove it».
-
#6
I somewhat agree with this. Perhaps the term «expired» would be good. Coming from a CS / ECE background, I still consider deprecated a poor term for what it actually means in CS anyway. However, I do like the idea of people learning new words, too; for instance: how many people are about to look up «esoteric»? Haha
But yes, I think this would be a good place to start a healthy discussion on a term change. Again, I toss my vote in for expired (simply meaning invalid / out of date). Obsolete is good, too, however I have come across some terms labeled «deprecated» that are actually still in use (though in a very limited way, like emergency backup), which technically wouldn’t make them obsolete by definition.
Just my $0.02.
You come from a «CS / ECE» background? We are talking about abbreviations that are not clear. I don’t have any idea of what «ECE» means and am guessing that «CS» means «computer science.» I’ve received private messages from people who don’t want to look stupid by asking in a post, so they ask me what some abbreviations mean. These are usually people who are new to the hobby or the site.
People who use abbreviations remind me of how difficult it is to speak with someone from the military. Somehow they think you know what their overwhelming number of abbreviations mean. «Well I was TDY, working in the OM on the CAS when the CO reminded me that the BOQ was full.» At that point I usually stop them and say that if they really want me to know what they are saying they will have to repeat that in English. They usually look at me with a «you should know what I’m saying dummy» look of annoyance.
One should never assume that everyone knows what an abbreviations means. That is why the correct method of introducing an abbreviation is to write it in full, followed by the definition, for example, the Operations and Maintenance (O & M) staff at the Dallas Facility (DF) reports to the Assistant Chief of O & M (ACOM). Newspaper articles are written this way as are scientific papers. I’ve read some newspaper articles where someone edited out the abbreviation explanation, making the rest of it incomprehensible.
Some abbreviations are common, such as «HQ,» «PD» and «FD.» The problem with other abbreviations is you can’t find the meaning with a Google search. Sometimes I don’t have time to look them up so I just stop reading the post.
I have a background in science, worked in the forestry profession and for an agency that has its own lingo. When I gave campfire talks and spoke to groups such as at schools, in public meetings and the like, I had to remember who my audience was. I then adjusted my words to fit the audience. We have to keep in mind our audience, which consists of people from a large number of professions and job backgrounds as well as a lot of beginners, some who may not even have a Radio Reference account. The latter may be deciding whether they want to take up the hobby. If they get overwhelmed with abbreviations they might just conclude that they are not interested.
-
#7
There are a lot of abbreviations used in the database, especially in the description of each channel and are not at all understandable. Some descriptions just mirror the tag, which, of course, has to be abbreviated. Where do these abbreviations come from? If someone finds out how a frequency is being used why do they enter abbreviations that are not understandable? The description column has enough space to have these abbreviations spelled out so there isn’t a need for them.
People use too many abbreviations when writing posts, but at least we have the opportunity to ask them what the heck they mean. For the database we don’t have this opportunity.
I have a bit of a problem with the use of the word «deprecated» as it is a computer science word. Although the word has some uses and definitions outside computer science it use is rare. I have seen several people try to use the word in posts and they misspell it with «depreciated» being the most frequent of these, and have even observed «decapitated!» The problem is not just the incorrect spelling, it is that so many people don’t even know the definition of the word. I’ve seen the word «deprecated» misspelled in the database and if I didn’t know the definition and proper use of the word, I would not be able to understand what is being conveyed. I Google search of the misspelled word does not result in the computer science definition of the word.
Deprecated really means «obsolete, don’t use anymore.» I had to look up the word when I first saw it as I had not seen it in my life up to that point. People who work in computer science have a language all their own and it is not one that is very well understood by people outside that profession. I have noticed that computer professionals often don’t communicate very well, leading to those infamous software instructions that no one understands.
Why can’t the word «obsolete» be used rather than the esoteric word «deprecated?» This is not a site of computer professionals trading tips.
Clear, easily interpreted words should be in use. Abbreviations and «deprecated» don’t accomplish that.
So you mean everything should be dumbed down? How about anyone who wonders what «deprecated» means type it in their Google or Yahoo bar. That’s all it takes. RR then doesn’t have to change anything and somebody learns something new. It’s a win/win to keep «deprecated» in the database.
Mike
-
#8
Obsolete generally indicates that something is old, no longer in use, and should be avoided. Expired means out of date and no longer able to be used. Deprecated, on the other hand, indicates that something is old and while may still be in use should be moved away from when practical. Two very different concepts. Many of the frequencies flagged as deprecated are often still licensed and although may not be in regular use, are still in place as a back-up (or even as a back-up to a back-up).
One such example was demonstrated by the person giving me a tour of their EOC. Among the various radios in their racks were ones for their existing state-wide trunked system, ones for their recently discontinued VHF-Hi frequencies, and one old radio for their very old (but still licensed) VHF-Low frequency.
When I asked him about that radio he smiled and said it still worked but is only used on very rare occasions. I asked how often that was and he said «About once every other decade or so». He then admitted that he used to use that radio to play remote chess with his counterpart in an adjacent county up until that person retired a couple of years ago. He then chuckled and stated that it really wasn’t used for playing, but in reality, the chess game was simply the situation they used for their twice weekly «tests of the backup radio system». He then showed me the logs to «prove it».
The fine points of difference you are explaining are lost on me. Why? Because the dictionary definition of «deprecated» do not reflect what you are saying. The Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary defines the word to mean: 1) a archaic to pray against evil, b to seek to avert 2) to express disapproval of 3) a PLAY DOWN make little of, b BELITTLE, DISPARAGE.
The computer science (CS) definition is found only when an online search is done. The meaning in that context is then explained in Wikipedia as: «Deprecation is a status applied to a computer software feature, characteristic, or practice indicating it should be avoided, typically because of it being superseded.» Again this definition is primarily known by those in the computer profession, not the public as a whole.
Here is an example from the forestry profession. A forester speaking to a group of people concerned with the management of forests might speak in professional terms, saying «the average DBH of the overstory is 39″, with a range of 12″ to 56.» This results in a component in the overstory that is not of sawtimber size that has a 18″ DBH minimum, but can be utilized for pulp or firewood, depending on the proximity of mills that can realize a profit from the full range of wood products.» The forester will not communicate with the audience with those words. It would be better to say it this way, «the tallest trees are big enough in diameter to make lumber and nearby lumber mills to make money cutting them. With an average of 39″, 4 x 4’s, 6 x 6’s and even larger can be made and those bigger posts sell for more, which more than makes up for the trees that are smaller than average. Trees smaller than 12» in diameter cannot be cut into lumber, even for 2 x 4’s, and make a profit . Those trees can be used for pulpwood, the material that paper is made from, or be used for firewood if the demand for it exists in the local area. If a paper mill or the demand for firewood are too far away money can’t be made because trucking the trees costs more than those products bring in.
The point of the example is that writing or speaking for the audience involved is necessary, and should not address just the profession of the writer. We are not all computer experts on the site. In fact, it took me a number of years on this website to figure out how to post pictures. The instructions are not clear and neither is the thread that explains it. Computer science people, on average, don’t communicate well with those outside the profession. They often don’t write software that is easy for a novice to use. The joke about Microsoft instructions involving a helicopter flying over Seattle applies to more than that company as evidenced by industry wide products. The definition you posted works for a person in the computer profession nicely as that term is used frequently in that field, but the audience here has probably never heard or read the word. I consider myself well read with a pretty good vocabulary and write as well as a person with my education should, am 62 years old, but I’d never run across «deprecated» before. When I did I avoided looking it up as I was in a hurry to get a large scanner program written so I brushed the task aside for awhile.
People in the electronics profession sometimes answer questions from those of us that aren’t using terms common in that field. If I have time I will look up the definition, but that doesn’t always result in the way the writer is using it.
A better term than «deprecated» needs to be used. I don’t know if that should be «superseded,» «no longer used,» «licensed but rarely used or just «rarely used.» Most of the time the licenses are either terminated or allowed to expire. When a write a file for my scanners I would look at rarely used (a term Gene Hughes used in his «Police Call» directories) and do one of the following. First, I may not put it in at all as there are higher priorities for memory space. If I’m not hearing everything I think is being used on an incident I will then do a limit search or use close call to find what is in use. I may look the agency up on the database and put any frequencies I don’t have into the scanner. Second, if I have the memory space, I will include the rarely used frequencies when I’m on the computer, but lock them out. If I don’t hear everything I think I should then I unlock them on the radio, an easier task than searching or entering them.
I miss the Police Call books. Those books and many local directories, especially the Scannerstuff directories were far more informative than our database. They not only contained far more information, it was easier to use. Those of us that understand radio systems and what pertinent information such as unit identifier systems need to keep working to improve both the database and the wiki.
I will relate an experience I had with a «computer type» I had when I first purchased my GRE-600s. I was a bit confused with the model’s operation and called GRE America. I told the person there that when I wrote a program I was having difficulty with such and such. His reply was to ask if I was really writing code attempting to modify its operation and he was alarmed, telling me that such was not possible . To him a program is code that operates the device. To a scanner owner, as evidenced by the discussions on this website, a program is the list of frequencies one enters into the scanner. Now I often say «I’m writing a file» instead. That GRE America computer type was not speaking to his audience.
-
#9
The word deprecated is appropriate for its application in the database. Don’t understand a technical word and its out of your field of expertise? Look it up. I hate the dumbing down of things. Its only ONE word and its use is not detrimental to the usage of the database if you can’t understand it.
jlanfn
California Database Admin
-
#10
Touching on the abbreviation issue…
The database administrator handbook is pretty clear that abbreviations are not to be used unless defined. See Section 6.1.3. The exception is the alpha tag field, which is where the standard abbreviations in Section 6.4.2 come in.
-
#11
In our context «deprecated» means no longer used or its use has been removed. The usage is valid for our purposes.
An analogy would be a fire engine that has been permanently removed from service would be termed «deprecated».
Russell
Last edited: Oct 18, 2013
-
#12
I agree over all about the word
«deprecated». It was a new word for me too, so I Googled it and learned a new word. No big deal. The use of abbreviated words/sentences, well that’s life and I don’t own this website, so I learn something new all the time. The site owner and the mods do a great job of keeping it together and letting us get information here.
-
#13
A better term than «deprecated» needs to be used.
Incorrect. Nothing needs to be changed simply because you don’t agree with it.
There is no public outcry over the usage of the term deprecated, and you are clearly in the minority even in your own thread. The term has been used on this site for years, which means any change at this point could potentially impact any scanner software or other applications that query the database.
I’m sorry that you’re an old fogey who would rather thumb through 30 year old copies of Police Call than adapt to the changing times, but we are in the 21st century now, in case you hadn’t noticed. The entirety of this website exists solely in the online world, and thus is part and parcel with computer technology. The usage of a computer term is perfectly appropriate when used in the context of a database, which is the backbone of this site.
You now know what the term deprecated means with regard to the context it is used in the RRDB, which means you should have no further confusion about it. Railing against «computer types» is not going to help your cause, especially in light of the site owner’s background in computer technology (yes, there is your «smoking gun» as far as why the term is used…Lindsay is one of them darn «computer types»).
PS — You may’ve gotten somewhat better results if you weren’t so verbose with your posts, and had simply suggested that the word «decommissioned» might be a better alternative.
-
#14
The word «deprecated» is not defined in the Merriam Webster dictionary in the copy next to my desk. The Oxford English dictionary, considered by most as the definitive source source of English words, does not show the computer science definition of the the word. Some of the results of an online search show the computer science definition.
During my career I wrote brochures, text for maps, worked with book authors, worked in a visitor center, designed and installed signs, drove patrol, and gave presentations to a wide scope of audiences. My college degree required six units of technical/scientific writing. I received additional communications and writing training during my career. The statement «AVOID PROFESSIONAL JARGON» is used in all the training I listed.
-
#15
Well that’s the word we use as defined in the handbook. Perhaps this thread has run it’s course.
Last edited: Oct 19, 2013
-
#16
I’ve been having some health problems for about 10 months now and I’m quite fatigued, especially in the last month. I haven’t had the energy to post lately. I’ve come across additional information I would like to share.
-
#17
I’ve been having some health problems for about 10 months now and I’m quite fatigued, especially in the last month. I haven’t had the energy to post lately.
Sorry to hear that, and I hope you return to better health soon.
I’ve come across additional information I would like to share.
To what end? This thread has been beaten to death and effectively (and mercifully) ended a month ago. I understand you haven’t posted much in that time, but the fact is that this topic has run its course. At a certain point you have to respect the fact that the people in charge of the website and database have made their decisions, and you move on.
-
#18
Touching on the abbreviation issue…
The database administrator handbook is pretty clear that abbreviations are not to be used unless defined. See Section 6.1.3. The exception is the alpha tag field, which is where the standard abbreviations in Section 6.4.2 come in.
If the direction in 6.1.3 was followed I wouldn’t have started this thread. As an employee of mine used to say, «there is many a slip twixt cup and lip.»
A few examples:
Vandenberg Air Force Base (VBG) Scanner Frequencies and Radio Frequency Reference
Under «Airfield Operations,» what does «ATIS» mean?
EDIT: The standard abbreviations listed in the handbook section 6.4.2 are helpful. I didn’t know the list existed or the handbook either. Someone mentioned the handbook here and I had to Google it to find it. Such a list should be clearly and easily accessible when the database is accessed. I looked at the database for it and didn’t find anything. Such a list should not be buried in a PDF document one has to Google to find.
http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=361
This one is riddled with unexplained abbreviations.
Under «General Services Talkgroups,» what does «STDNDS» mean?
Under «Harbor Talkgroups,» what does «Polasur» mean?
Under «Information Technology Agency,» the terms «CSC,» «PTC-90,» «SSVCS,» «FS-1» and «EP-PSSS» completely confuse me. In these cases the tag is used again under description where there is plenty of room to describe what these terms mean.
Under «Public Works — Bureau of Sanitation Talkgroups:»
Hyperion Treatment Plant — WCC » «VAX DATA» and «RECY-SWM,» what do those mean? Above the «Hyperion Treatment Plant — WCC» is an abbreviation «PROC,» which I assume is «procurement,» but how do I know? It seems weird that an office administrative function would have a radio talkgroup, so it would seem «PROC» means something else, but what?
Additional undefined abbreviations are used in the additional public works talkgroups below the Sanitation talkgroups. Again the tag abbreviations are copied over in the description column.
When I download a system like the LA Municipal Services trunked system and anything else I download, be it a trunked or conventional system I change nearly every tag when I write a file. This is not a complaint as everyone probably customizes the alpha tags to suit their own logic. However, it is difficult to come up with a new alpha tag when I don’t understand what the frequency or talkgroups is used for due to undefined talkgroups. If there isn’t any source available to explain the abbreviation then the words «use unknown» or «abbreviation definition unknown.» Just listing «RECY-SWM» under both the tag and description does not follow the policy in the handbook section 6.1.3.
I could continue finding examples as they are all over the database. This database is responsible, along with the Wiki, for the demise of printed directories where the authors took the time to find out what these terms mean or explained that they could not. The channel plans shown in those directories and call sign information was far superior to most of the database and Wiki. We should have a database that is as helpful as the printed directories it usurped.
The Wiki is hard to navigate through also. I will start a thread in the Wiki topic to explain and list specific examples of how hard it is to find information.
I’m sorry to see administrators who get defensive and quote policy as if it is written in stone. The objective should be to communicate and disseminate information that is understandable to beginners as well as those with electrical engineering and computer science types. It sometimes appears as if the latter two are satisfied and are unwilling to make some suggested changes.
Last edited: Nov 16, 2013
-
#20
Most of these items could be added to the «Glossary».
The volume of undefined abbreviations is huge. Some of the terms are specific to a jurisdiction, a county or a state. The real solution is to have the abbreviation explained or not use abbreviations at all in the description column. People should not have to access the Wiki and look through an alphabetical list of terms, which would become tens of times more lengthy than it is now if all these abbreviations were put there.
With all due respect, this is a slight pet peeve of mine and the selected answer for this is actually wrong.
Granted language evolves, e.g., «google» is now a verb, apparently. Through what’s known as «common use», it has earned its way into official dictionaries. However, «google» was a new word representing something heretofore non-existent in our speech.
Common use does not cover blatantly changing the meaning of a word just because we didn’t understand its definition in the first place, no matter how many people keep repeating it.
The entire English-speaking computer industry seems to use «deprecate» to mean some feature that is being phased out or no longer relevant. Not bad, just not recommended. Usually, because there is a new and better replacement.
The actual definition of deprecate is to put down, or speak negatively about, or to express disapproval, or make fun of someone or something through degradation.
It comes from Latin de- (against) precari (to pray). To «pray against» to a 21st century person probably conjures up thoughts of warding off evil spirits or something, which is probably where the disconnect occurs with people. In fact, to pray or to pray for something meant to wish good upon, to speak about in a positive way. To pray against would be to speak ill of or to put down or denigrate. See this excerpt from the Oxford English Dictionary.
-
Express disapproval of:
(as adjective deprecating) he sniffed in a deprecating way -
another term for depreciate ( sense 2).
he deprecates the value of children’s television
What people generally mean to convey when using deprecate, in the IT industry anyway, and perhaps others, is that something has lost value. Something has lost relevance. Something has fallen out of favor. Not that it has no value, it is just not as valuable as before (probably due to being replaced by something new.) We have two words that deal with concept in English and the first is «depreciate». See this excerpt from the Oxford English Dictionary.
-
Diminish in value over a period of time:
the pound is expected to depreciate against the dollar -
Disparage or belittle (something):
Notice that definition 2 sounds like deprecate. So, ironically, deprecate can mean depreciate in some contexts, just not the one commonly used by IT folk.
Also, just because currency depreciation is a nice common use of the word depreciate, and therefore easy to cite as an example, doesn’t mean it’s the only context in which the word is relevant. It’s just an example. ONE example.
The correct transitive verb for this is «obsolete». You obsolete something because its value has depreciated.
See this excerpt from the Oxford English Dictionary.
Verb — Cause something to be or become obsolete by replacing it with something new.
It bugs me, it just bugs me. I don’t know why. Maybe because I see it everywhere. In every computer book I read, every lecture I attend, and on every technical site on the internet, someone invariably drops the d-bomb sooner or later. If this one ends up in the dictionary at some point, I will concede, but conclude that the gatekeepers of the English lexicon have become weak and have lost their way… or at the very least, lost their nerve. Even Wikipedia espouses this misuse, and indeed, defends it. I’ve already edited the page thrice, and they keep removing my edits.
Something is depreciated until it is obsolete. Deprecate, in the context of IT, makes no sense at all, unless you’re putting down someone’s performance or work or product or the fact that they still wear parachute pants.
Conclusion: The entire IT industry uses deprecate incorrectly. It may be common use. It may be some huge mis-understanding. But it is still, completely, wrong.
Your most readily understood answer is going to be simply made obsolete. Here is why looking for something else can lead to problems:
Attempting to capture a precise meaning in a single word without context will often lead to ambiguities. While you provide context in one example, it doesn’t necessarily apply in similarly worded examples.
To illustrate this, let’s start with your context:
The automobile made the horse and buggy obsolete.
I’ll show some counterexamples further on that would make you question the value of these choices. But using some of the most up-voted suggestions, you can ask yourself: are these statements necessarily going to mean the same?
The automobile superseded the horse and buggy.
The automobile supplanted the horse and buggy.
The automobile deprecated the horse and buggy.
The automobile displaced the horse and buggy.
The automobile eclipsed the horse and buggy.
For each of these words, there are multiple definitions. They are not all consistent with «make obsolete»:
supersede: to succeed to the position, function, office, etc., of
supplant: to take the place or move into the position of
deprecate: to express disapproval of; deplore.
displace: to move from the usual or correct location
eclipse: to surpass; outshine
In choosing «the best words», you are still left with the job of ensuring that what the listener hears is the same as what you say.
If you changed the context, do these highlighted words mean «made obsolete»?
Here are the counterexamples:
In the national park, federal law supersedes state law.
This year, imported cars are expected to supplant domestically produced vehicles.
The scientists were mocked in a move to deprecate the oil industry.
The war displaced millions of people.
When Ryun eclipsed the four minute mile, it became a realistic goal for many to strive for.
It should be obvious that none of these statements conveys the notion of made obsolete.
Words with multiple meanings have their place, and they only convey their intended meaning with the right context. None of the examples above about the automobile will necessarily be understood to mean «made obsolete» except to the person who already knows that simple fact.