Is buddhism a word

An image of a lantern used in the Vesak Festival; which celebrates the birth, enlightenment, and Parinirvana of the Buddha.

Buddhism ( BUU-dih-zəm, BOOD),[1][2][3] also known as Buddha Dharma and Dharmavinaya (transl. »doctrines and disciplines»), is an Indian religion or philosophical tradition based on teachings attributed to the Buddha.[4] It originated in present-day North India as a śramaṇa–movement in the 5th century BCE, and gradually spread throughout much of Asia via the Silk Road. It is the world’s fourth-largest religion,[5][6] with over 520 million followers (Buddhists) who comprise seven percent of the global population.[7][8][9]

The Buddha’s central teachings emphasize the aim of attaining liberation from attachment or clinging to existence, which is said to be marked by impermanence (anitya), dissatisfaction/suffering (duḥkha), and the absence of lasting essence (anātman).[10] He endorsed the Middle Way, a path of spiritual development that avoids both extreme asceticism and hedonism. A summary of this path is expressed in the Noble Eightfold Path, a training of the mind through observance of Buddhist ethics and meditation. Other widely observed practices include: monasticism; «taking refuge» in the Buddha, the dharma, and the saṅgha; and the cultivation of perfections (pāramitā).[11]

Buddhist schools vary in their interpretation of the paths to liberation (mārga) as well as the relative importance and ‘canonicity’ assigned to various Buddhist texts, and their specific teachings and practices.[12][13] Two major extant branches of Buddhism are generally recognized by scholars: Theravāda (lit.‘School of the Elders’) and Mahāyāna (lit.‘Great Vehicle’). The Theravada tradition emphasizes the attainment of nirvāṇa (lit.‘extinguishing’) as a means of transcending the individual self and ending the cycle of death and rebirth (saṃsāra),[14][15][16] while the Mahayana tradition emphasizes the Bodhisattva-ideal, in which one works for the liberation of all beings. The Buddhist canon is vast, with many different textual collections in different languages (such as Sanskrit, Pali, Tibetan and Chinese).[17]

The Theravāda branch has a widespread following in Sri Lanka as well as in Southeast Asia, namely Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia. The Mahāyāna branch—which includes the traditions of Zen, Pure Land, Nichiren, Tiantai, Tendai, and Shingon—is predominantly practiced in Nepal, Bhutan, China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan, Korea, and Japan. Additionally, Vajrayāna (lit.‘Indestructible Vehicle’), a body of teachings attributed to Indian adepts, may be viewed as a separate branch or tradition within Mahāyāna.[18] Tibetan Buddhism, which preserves the Vajrayāna teachings of eighth-century India, is practiced in the Himalayan states as well as in Mongolia[19] and Russian Kalmykia.[20] Historically, until the early 2nd millennium, Buddhism was widely practiced in the Indian subcontinent;[21][22][23] it also had a foothold to some extent elsewhere in Asia, namely Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, and the Philippines.

Etymology

Buddhism is an Indian religion[24] or philosophy. The Buddha («the Awakened One»), a Śramaṇa; who lived in South Asia c. 6th or 5th century BCE.[25][26]

Followers of Buddhism, called Buddhists in English, referred to themselves as Sakyan-s or Sakyabhiksu in ancient India.[27][28] Buddhist scholar Donald S. Lopez asserts they also used the term Bauddha,[29] although scholar Richard Cohen asserts that that term was used only by outsiders to describe Buddhists.[30]

The Buddha

Ancient kingdoms and cities of India during the time of the Buddha (circa 500 BCE) – modern-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan

Enlightenment of Buddha, Kushan dynasty, late 2nd to early 3rd century CE, Gandhara

Details of the Buddha’s life are mentioned in many Early Buddhist Texts but are inconsistent. His social background and life details are difficult to prove, and the precise dates are uncertain, although the 5th century BCE seems to be the best estimate.[31][note 1]

Early texts have the Buddha’s family name as «Gautama» (Pali: Gotama), while some texts give Siddhartha as his surname. He was born in Lumbini, present-day Nepal and grew up in Kapilavastu,[note 2] a town in the Ganges Plain, near the modern Nepal–India border, and that he spent his life in what is now modern Bihar[note 3] and Uttar Pradesh.[39][31] Some hagiographic legends state that his father was a king named Suddhodana, his mother was Queen Maya.[40] Scholars such as Richard Gombrich consider this a dubious claim because a combination of evidence suggests he was born in the Shakya community, which was governed by a small oligarchy or republic-like council where there were no ranks but where seniority mattered instead.[41][note 4] Some of the stories about the Buddha, his life, his teachings, and claims about the society he grew up in may have been invented and interpolated at a later time into the Buddhist texts.[44][45]

According to early texts such as the Pali Ariyapariyesanā-sutta («The discourse on the noble quest», MN 26) and its Chinese parallel at MĀ 204, Gautama was moved by the suffering (dukkha) of life and death, and its endless repetition due to rebirth.[46] He thus set out on a quest to find liberation from suffering (also known as «nirvana»).[47] Early texts and biographies state that Gautama first studied under two teachers of meditation, namely Āḷāra Kālāma (Sanskrit: Arada Kalama) and Uddaka Ramaputta (Sanskrit: Udraka Ramaputra), learning meditation and philosophy, particularly the meditative attainment of «the sphere of nothingness» from the former, and «the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception» from the latter.[48][49][note 5]

Finding these teachings to be insufficient to attain his goal, he turned to the practice of severe asceticism, which included a strict fasting regime and various forms of breath control.[52] This too fell short of attaining his goal, and then he turned to the meditative practice of dhyana. He famously sat in meditation under a Ficus religiosa tree — now called the Bodhi Tree — in the town of Bodh Gaya and attained «Awakening» (Bodhi).[53]

According to various early texts like the Mahāsaccaka-sutta, and the Samaññaphala Sutta, on awakening, the Buddha gained insight into the workings of karma and his former lives, as well as achieving the ending of the mental defilements (asavas), the ending of suffering, and the end of rebirth in saṃsāra.[52] This event also brought certainty about the Middle Way as the right path of spiritual practice to end suffering.[54][55] As a fully enlightened Buddha, he attracted followers and founded a Sangha (monastic order).[56] He spent the rest of his life teaching the Dharma he had discovered, and then died, achieving «final nirvana», at the age of 80 in Kushinagar, India.[57][34]

The Buddha’s teachings were propagated by his followers, which in the last centuries of the 1st millennium BCE became various Buddhist schools of thought, each with its own basket of texts containing different interpretations and authentic teachings of the Buddha;[58][59][60] these over time evolved into many traditions of which the more well known and widespread in the modern era are Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism.[61][62][note 6]

Worldview

The term «Buddhism» is an occidental neologism, commonly (and «rather roughly» according to Donald S. Lopez Jr.) used as a translation for the Dharma of the Buddha, fójiào in Chinese, bukkyō in Japanese, nang pa sangs rgyas pa’i chos in Tibetan, buddhadharma in Sanskrit, buddhaśāsana in Pali.[65]

Four Noble Truths – dukkha and its ending

color manuscript illustration of Buddha teaching the Four Noble Truths, Nalanda, Bihar, India

The Buddha teaching the Four Noble Truths. Sanskrit manuscript. Nalanda, Bihar, India

The Four Truths express the basic orientation of Buddhism: we crave and cling to impermanent states and things, which is dukkha, «incapable of satisfying» and painful.[66][67] This keeps us caught in saṃsāra, the endless cycle of repeated rebirth, dukkha and dying again.[note 7]
But there is a way to liberation from this endless cycle[73] to the state of nirvana, namely following the Noble Eightfold Path.[note 8]

The truth of dukkha is the basic insight that life in this mundane world, with its clinging and craving to impermanent states and things[66] is dukkha, and unsatisfactory.[68][79][web 1] Dukkha can be translated as «incapable of satisfying»,[web 5] «the unsatisfactory nature and the general insecurity of all conditioned phenomena»; or «painful».[66][67] Dukkha is most commonly translated as «suffering», but this is inaccurate, since it refers not to episodic suffering, but to the intrinsically unsatisfactory nature of temporary states and things, including pleasant but temporary experiences.[note 9] We expect happiness from states and things which are impermanent, and therefore cannot attain real happiness.

In Buddhism, dukkha is one of the three marks of existence, along with impermanence and anattā (non-self).[85] Buddhism, like other major Indian religions, asserts that everything is impermanent (anicca), but, unlike them, also asserts that there is no permanent self or soul in living beings (anattā).[86][87][88] The ignorance or misperception (avijjā) that anything is permanent or that there is self in any being is considered a wrong understanding, and the primary source of clinging and dukkha.[89][90][91]

The cycle of rebirth

Saṃsāra

Saṃsāra means «wandering» or «world», with the connotation of cyclic, circuitous change.[92][93] It refers to the theory of rebirth and «cyclicality of all life, matter, existence», a fundamental assumption of Buddhism, as with all major Indian religions.[93][94] Samsara in Buddhism is considered to be dukkha, unsatisfactory and painful,[95] perpetuated by desire and avidya (ignorance), and the resulting karma.[93][96][97] Liberation from this cycle of existence, nirvana, has been the foundation and the most important historical justification of Buddhism.[98][99]

Buddhist texts assert that rebirth can occur in six realms of existence, namely three good realms (heavenly, demi-god, human) and three evil realms (animal, hungry ghosts, hellish).[note 10] Samsara ends if a person attains nirvana, the «blowing out» of the afflictions through insight into impermanence and «non-self».[101][102][103]

Rebirth

A very large hill behind two palm trees and a boulevard, where the Buddha is believed to have been cremated

Rebirth refers to a process whereby beings go through a succession of lifetimes as one of many possible forms of sentient life, each running from conception to death.[104] In Buddhist thought, this rebirth does not involve a soul or any fixed substance. This is because the Buddhist doctrine of anattā (Sanskrit: anātman, no-self doctrine) rejects the concepts of a permanent self or an unchanging, eternal soul found in other religions.[105][106]

The Buddhist traditions have traditionally disagreed on what it is in a person that is reborn, as well as how quickly the rebirth occurs after death.[107][108] Some Buddhist traditions assert that «no self» doctrine means that there is no enduring self, but there is avacya (inexpressible) personality (pudgala) which migrates from one life to another.[107] The majority of Buddhist traditions, in contrast, assert that vijñāna (a person’s consciousness) though evolving, exists as a continuum and is the mechanistic basis of what undergoes the rebirth process.[68][107] The quality of one’s rebirth depends on the merit or demerit gained by one’s karma (i.e. actions), as well as that accrued on one’s behalf by a family member.[note 11] Buddhism also developed a complex cosmology to explain the various realms or planes of rebirth.[95]

Karma

In Buddhism, karma (from Sanskrit: «action, work») drives saṃsāra – the endless cycle of suffering and rebirth for each being. Good, skilful deeds (Pāli: kusala) and bad, unskilful deeds (Pāli: akusala) produce «seeds» in the unconscious receptacle (ālaya) that mature later either in this life or in a subsequent rebirth.[110][111] The existence of karma is a core belief in Buddhism, as with all major Indian religions, and it implies neither fatalism nor that everything that happens to a person is caused by karma.[112][note 12]

A central aspect of Buddhist theory of karma is that intent (cetanā) matters and is essential to bring about a consequence or phala «fruit» or vipāka «result».[113][note 13] However, good or bad karma accumulates even if there is no physical action, and just having ill or good thoughts creates karmic seeds; thus, actions of body, speech or mind all lead to karmic seeds.[112] In the Buddhist traditions, life aspects affected by the law of karma in past and current births of a being include the form of rebirth, realm of rebirth, social class, character and major circumstances of a lifetime.[112][117][118] It operates like the laws of physics, without external intervention, on every being in all six realms of existence including human beings and gods.[112][119]

A notable aspect of the karma theory in Buddhism is merit transfer.[120][121] A person accumulates merit not only through intentions and ethical living, but also is able to gain merit from others by exchanging goods and services, such as through dāna (charity to monks or nuns).[122] Further, a person can transfer one’s own good karma to living family members and ancestors.[121][note 14]

Liberation

An aniconic depiction of the Buddha’s spiritual liberation (moksha) or awakening (bodhi), at Sanchi. The Buddha is not depicted, only symbolized by the Bodhi tree and the empty seat

The cessation of the kleshas and the attainment of nirvana (nibbāna), with which the cycle of rebirth ends, has been the primary and the soteriological goal of the Buddhist path for monastic life since the time of the Buddha.[75][125][126] The term «path» is usually taken to mean the Noble Eightfold Path, but other versions of «the path» can also be found in the Nikayas.[note 15] In some passages in the Pali Canon, a distinction is being made between right knowledge or insight (sammā-ñāṇa), and right liberation or release (sammā-vimutti), as the means to attain cessation and liberation.[128][129]

Nirvana literally means «blowing out, quenching, becoming extinguished».[130][131] In early Buddhist texts, it is the state of restraint and self-control that leads to the «blowing out» and the ending of the cycles of sufferings associated with rebirths and redeaths.[132][133][134] Many later Buddhist texts describe nirvana as identical with anatta with complete «emptiness, nothingness».[135][136][137][note 16] In some texts, the state is described with greater detail, such as passing through the gate of emptiness (sunyata) – realising that there is no soul or self in any living being, then passing through the gate of signlessness (animitta) – realising that nirvana cannot be perceived, and finally passing through the gate of wishlessness (apranihita) – realising that nirvana is the state of not even wishing for nirvana.[125][139][note 17]

The nirvana state has been described in Buddhist texts partly in a manner similar to other Indian religions, as the state of complete liberation, enlightenment, highest happiness, bliss, fearlessness, freedom, permanence, non-dependent origination, unfathomable, and indescribable.[141][142] It has also been described in part differently, as a state of spiritual release marked by «emptiness» and realisation of non-self.[143][144][145][note 18]

While Buddhism considers the liberation from saṃsāra as the ultimate spiritual goal, in traditional practice, the primary focus of a vast majority of lay Buddhists has been to seek and accumulate merit through good deeds, donations to monks and various Buddhist rituals in order to gain better rebirths rather than nirvana.[148][149][note 19]

Dependent arising

Pratityasamutpada, also called «dependent arising, or dependent origination», is the Buddhist theory to explain the nature and relations of being, becoming, existence and ultimate reality. Buddhism asserts that there is nothing independent, except the state of nirvana.[152] All physical and mental states depend on and arise from other pre-existing states, and in turn from them arise other dependent states while they cease.[153]

The ‘dependent arisings’ have a causal conditioning, and thus Pratityasamutpada is the Buddhist belief that causality is the basis of ontology, not a creator God nor the ontological Vedic concept called universal Self (Brahman) nor any other ‘transcendent creative principle’.[154][155] However, Buddhist thought does not understand causality in terms of Newtonian mechanics; rather it understands it as conditioned arising.[156][157] In Buddhism, dependent arising refers to conditions created by a plurality of causes that necessarily co-originate a phenomenon within and across lifetimes, such as karma in one life creating conditions that lead to rebirth in one of the realms of existence for another lifetime.[158][159][160]

Buddhism applies the theory of dependent arising to explain origination of endless cycles of dukkha and rebirth, through Twelve Nidānas or «twelve links». It states that because Avidyā (ignorance) exists, Saṃskāras (karmic formations) exist; because Saṃskāras exist therefore Vijñāna (consciousness) exists; and in a similar manner it links Nāmarūpa (the sentient body), Ṣaḍāyatana (our six senses), Sparśa (sensory stimulation), Vedanā (feeling), Taṇhā (craving), Upādāna (grasping), Bhava (becoming), Jāti (birth), and Jarāmaraṇa (old age, death, sorrow, and pain).[161][162] By breaking the circuitous links of the Twelve Nidanas, Buddhism asserts that liberation from these endless cycles of rebirth and dukkha can be attained.[163]

Not-Self and Emptiness

A related doctrine in Buddhism is that of anattā (Pali) or anātman (Sanskrit). It is the view that there is no unchanging, permanent self, soul or essence in phenomena.[164] The Buddha and Buddhist philosophers who follow him such as Vasubandhu and Buddhaghosa, generally argue for this view by analyzing the person through the schema of the five aggregates, and then attempting to show that none of these five components of personality can be permanent or absolute.[165] This can be seen in Buddhist discourses such as the Anattalakkhana Sutta.

«Emptiness» or «voidness» (Skt: Śūnyatā, Pali: Suññatā), is a related concept with many different interpretations throughout the various Buddhisms. In early Buddhism, it was commonly stated that all five aggregates are void (rittaka), hollow (tucchaka), coreless (asāraka), for example as in the Pheṇapiṇḍūpama Sutta (SN 22:95).[166] Similarly, in Theravada Buddhism, it often means that the five aggregates are empty of a Self.[167]

Emptiness is a central concept in Mahāyāna Buddhism, especially in Nagarjuna’s Madhyamaka school, and in the Prajñāpāramitā sutras. In Madhyamaka philosophy, emptiness is the view which holds that all phenomena (dharmas) are without any svabhava (literally «own-nature» or «self-nature»), and are thus without any underlying essence, and so are «empty» of being independent. This doctrine sought to refute the heterodox theories of svabhava circulating at the time.[168]

The Three Jewels

All forms of Buddhism revere and take spiritual refuge in the «three jewels» (triratna): Buddha, Dharma and Sangha.[169]

Buddha

While all varieties of Buddhism revere «Buddha» and «buddhahood», they have different views on what these are. Regardless of their interpretation, the concept of Buddha is central to all forms of Buddhism.

In Theravada Buddhism, a Buddha is someone who has become awake through their own efforts and insight. They have put an end to their cycle of rebirths and have ended all unwholesome mental states which lead to bad action and thus are morally perfected.[170] While subject to the limitations of the human body in certain ways (for example, in the early texts, the Buddha suffers from backaches), a Buddha is said to be «deep, immeasurable, hard-to-fathom as is the great ocean,» and also has immense psychic powers (abhijñā).[171] Theravada generally sees Gautama Buddha (the historical Buddha Sakyamuni) as the only Buddha of the current era.

Mahāyāna Buddhism meanwhile, has a vastly expanded cosmology, with various Buddhas and other holy beings (aryas) residing in different realms. Mahāyāna texts not only revere numerous Buddhas besides Shakyamuni, such as Amitabha and Vairocana, but also see them as transcendental or supramundane (lokuttara) beings.[172] Mahāyāna Buddhism holds that these other Buddhas in other realms can be contacted and are able to benefit beings in this world.[173] In Mahāyāna, a Buddha is a kind of «spiritual king», a «protector of all creatures» with a lifetime that is countless of eons long, rather than just a human teacher who has transcended the world after death.[174] Shakyamuni’s life and death on earth is then usually understood as a «mere appearance» or «a manifestation skilfully projected into earthly life by a long-enlightened transcendent being, who is still available to teach the faithful through visionary experiences.»[174][175]

Dharma

The second of the three jewels is «Dharma» (Pali: Dhamma), which in Buddhism refers to the Buddha’s teaching, which includes all of the main ideas outlined above. While this teaching reflects the true nature of reality, it is not a belief to be clung to, but a pragmatic teaching to be put into practice. It is likened to a raft which is «for crossing over» (to nirvana) not for holding on to.[176] It also refers to the universal law and cosmic order which that teaching both reveals and relies upon.[177] It is an everlasting principle which applies to all beings and worlds. In that sense it is also the ultimate truth and reality about the universe, it is thus «the way that things really are.»

Sangha

The third «jewel» which Buddhists take refuge in is the «Sangha», which refers to the monastic community of monks and nuns who follow Gautama Buddha’s monastic discipline which was «designed to shape the Sangha as an ideal community, with the optimum conditions for spiritual growth.»[178] The Sangha consists of those who have chosen to follow the Buddha’s ideal way of life, which is one of celibate monastic renunciation with minimal material possessions (such as an alms bowl and robes).[179]

The Sangha is seen as important because they preserve and pass down Buddha Dharma. As Gethin states «the Sangha lives the teaching, preserves the teaching as Scriptures and teaches the wider community. Without the Sangha there is no Buddhism.»[180] The Sangha also acts as a «field of merit» for laypersons, allowing them to make spiritual merit or goodness by donating to the Sangha and supporting them. In return, they keep their duty to preserve and spread the Dharma everywhere for the good of the world.[181]

There is also a separate definition of Sangha, referring to those who have attained any stage of awakening, whether or not they are monastics. This sangha is called the āryasaṅgha «noble Sangha».[182] All forms of Buddhism generally reveres these āryas (Pali: ariya, «noble ones» or «holy ones») who are spiritually attained beings. Aryas have attained the fruits of the Buddhist path.[183] Becoming an arya is a goal in most forms of Buddhism. The āryasaṅgha includes holy beings such as bodhisattvas, arhats and stream-enterers.

Other key Mahāyāna views

Mahāyāna Buddhism also differs from Theravada and the other schools of early Buddhism in promoting several unique doctrines which are contained in Mahāyāna sutras and philosophical treatises.

One of these is the unique interpretation of emptiness and dependent origination found in the Madhyamaka school. Another very influential doctrine for Mahāyāna is the main philosophical view of the Yogācāra school variously, termed Vijñaptimātratā-vāda («the doctrine that there are only ideas» or «mental impressions») or Vijñānavāda («the doctrine of consciousness»). According to Mark Siderits, what classical Yogācāra thinkers like Vasubandhu had in mind is that we are only ever aware of mental images or impressions, which may appear as external objects, but «there is actually no such thing outside the mind.»[184] There are several interpretations of this main theory, many scholars see it as a type of Idealism, others as a kind of phenomenology.[185]

Another very influential concept unique to Mahāyāna is that of «Buddha-nature» (buddhadhātu) or «Tathagata-womb» (tathāgatagarbha). Buddha-nature is a concept found in some 1st-millennium CE Buddhist texts, such as the Tathāgatagarbha sūtras. According to Paul Williams these Sutras suggest that ‘all sentient beings contain a Tathagata’ as their ‘essence, core inner nature, Self’.[186][note 20] According to Karl Brunnholzl «the earliest mahayana sutras that are based on and discuss the notion of tathāgatagarbha as the buddha potential that is innate in all sentient beings began to appear in written form in the late second and early third century.»[188] For some, the doctrine seems to conflict with the Buddhist anatta doctrine (non-Self), leading scholars to posit that the Tathāgatagarbha Sutras were written to promote Buddhism to non-Buddhists.[189][190] This can be seen in texts like the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra, which state that Buddha-nature is taught to help those who have fear when they listen to the teaching of anatta.[191] Buddhist texts like the Ratnagotravibhāga clarify that the «Self» implied in Tathagatagarbha doctrine is actually «not-self».[192][193] Various interpretations of the concept have been advanced by Buddhist thinkers throughout the history of Buddhist thought and most attempt to avoid anything like the Hindu Atman doctrine.

These Indian Buddhist ideas, in various synthetic ways, form the basis of subsequent Mahāyāna philosophy in Tibetan Buddhism and East Asian Buddhism.

Paths to liberation

The Bodhipakkhiyādhammā are seven lists of qualities or factors that contribute to awakening (bodhi). Each list is a short summary of the Buddhist path, and the seven lists substantially overlap. The best-known list in the West is the Noble Eightfold Path, but a wide variety of paths and models of progress have been used and described in the different Buddhist traditions. However, they generally share basic practices such as sila (ethics), samadhi (meditation, dhyana) and prajña (wisdom), which are known as the three trainings. An important additional practice is a kind and compassionate attitude toward every living being and the world. Devotion is also important in some Buddhist traditions, and in the Tibetan traditions visualisations of deities and mandalas are important. The value of textual study is regarded differently in the various Buddhist traditions. It is central to Theravada and highly important to Tibetan Buddhism, while the Zen tradition takes an ambiguous stance.

An important guiding principle of Buddhist practice is the Middle Way (madhyamapratipad). It was a part of Buddha’s first sermon, where he presented the Noble Eightfold Path that was a ‘middle way’ between the extremes of asceticism and hedonistic sense pleasures.[194][195] In Buddhism, states Harvey, the doctrine of «dependent arising» (conditioned arising, pratītyasamutpāda) to explain rebirth is viewed as the ‘middle way’ between the doctrines that a being has a «permanent soul» involved in rebirth (eternalism) and «death is final and there is no rebirth» (annihilationism).[196][197]

Paths to liberation in the early texts

A common presentation style of the path (mārga) to liberation in the Early Buddhist Texts is the «graduated talk», in which the Buddha lays out a step by step training.[198]

In the early texts, numerous different sequences of the gradual path can be found.[199] One of the most important and widely used presentations among the various Buddhist schools is The Noble Eightfold Path, or «Eightfold Path of the Noble Ones» (Skt. ‘āryāṣṭāṅgamārga’). This can be found in various discourses, most famously in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta (The discourse on the turning of the Dharma wheel).

Other suttas such as the Tevijja Sutta, and the Cula-Hatthipadopama-sutta give a different outline of the path, though with many similar elements such as ethics and meditation.[199]

According to Rupert Gethin, the path to awakening is also frequently summarized by another a short formula: «abandoning the hindrances, practice of the four establishings of mindfulness, and development of the awakening factors.»[200]

Noble Eightfold Path

The Eightfold Path consists of a set of eight interconnected factors or conditions, that when developed together, lead to the cessation of dukkha.[201] These eight factors are: Right View (or Right Understanding), Right Intention (or Right Thought), Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, and Right Concentration.

This Eightfold Path is the fourth of the Four Noble Truths, and asserts the path to the cessation of dukkha (suffering, pain, unsatisfactoriness).[202][203] The path teaches that the way of the enlightened ones stopped their craving, clinging and karmic accumulations, and thus ended their endless cycles of rebirth and suffering.[204][205][206]

The Noble Eightfold Path is grouped into three basic divisions, as follows:[207][208][209]

Division Eightfold factor Sanskrit, Pali Description
Wisdom
(Sanskrit: prajñā,
Pāli: paññā)
1. Right view samyag dṛṣṭi,
sammā ditthi
The belief that there is an afterlife and not everything ends with death, that Buddha taught and followed a successful path to nirvana;[207] according to Peter Harvey, the right view is held in Buddhism as a belief in the Buddhist principles of karma and rebirth, and the importance of the Four Noble Truths and the True Realities.[210]
2. Right intention samyag saṃkalpa,
sammā saṅkappa
Giving up home and adopting the life of a religious mendicant in order to follow the path;[207] this concept, states Harvey, aims at peaceful renunciation, into an environment of non-sensuality, non-ill-will (to lovingkindness), away from cruelty (to compassion).[210]
Moral virtues[208]
(Sanskrit: śīla,
Pāli: sīla)
3. Right speech samyag vāc,
sammā vāca
No lying, no rude speech, no telling one person what another says about him, speaking that which leads to salvation.[207]
4. Right action samyag karman,
sammā kammanta
No killing or injuring, no taking what is not given; no sexual acts in monastic pursuit,[207] for lay Buddhists no sensual misconduct such as sexual involvement with someone married, or with an unmarried woman protected by her parents or relatives.[211][212][213]
5. Right livelihood samyag ājīvana,
sammā ājīva
For monks, beg to feed, only possessing what is essential to sustain life.[214] For lay Buddhists, the canonical texts state right livelihood as abstaining from wrong livelihood, explained as not becoming a source or means of suffering to sentient beings by cheating them, or harming or killing them in any way.[215][216]
Meditation[208]
(Sanskrit and Pāli: samādhi)
6. Right effort samyag vyāyāma,
sammā vāyāma
Guard against sensual thoughts; this concept, states Harvey, aims at preventing unwholesome states that disrupt meditation.[217]
7. Right mindfulness samyag smṛti,
sammā sati
Never be absent-minded, conscious of what one is doing; this, states Harvey, encourages mindfulness about impermanence of the body, feelings and mind, as well as to experience the five skandhas, the five hindrances, the four True Realities and seven factors of awakening.[217]
8. Right concentration samyag samādhi,
sammā samādhi
Correct meditation or concentration (dhyana), explained as the four jhānas.[207][218]

Common Buddhist practices

Hearing and learning the Dharma

In various suttas which present the graduated path taught by the Buddha, such as the Samaññaphala Sutta and the Cula-Hatthipadopama Sutta, the first step on the path is hearing the Buddha teach the Dharma. This then said to lead to the acquiring of confidence or faith in the Buddha’s teachings.[199]

Mahayana Buddhist teachers such as Yin Shun also state that hearing the Dharma and study of the Buddhist discourses is necessary «if one wants to learn and practice the Buddha Dharma.»[219] Likewise, in Indo-Tibetan Buddhism, the «Stages of the Path» (Lamrim) texts generally place the activity of listening to the Buddhist teachings as an important early practice.[220]

Refuge

Traditionally, the first step in most Buddhist schools requires taking of the «Three Refuges», also called the Three Jewels (Sanskrit: triratna, Pali: tiratana) as the foundation of one’s religious practice.[221] This practice may have been influenced by the Brahmanical motif of the triple refuge, found in the Rigveda 9.97.47, Rigveda 6.46.9 and Chandogya Upanishad 2.22.3–4.[222] Tibetan Buddhism sometimes adds a fourth refuge, in the lama. The three refuges are believed by Buddhists to be protective and a form of reverence.[221]

The ancient formula which is repeated for taking refuge affirms that «I go to the Buddha as refuge, I go to the Dhamma as refuge, I go to the Sangha as refuge.»[223] Reciting the three refuges, according to Harvey, is considered not as a place to hide, rather a thought that «purifies, uplifts and strengthens the heart».[169]

Śīla – Buddhist ethics

Buddhist monks collect alms in Si Phan Don, Laos. Giving is a key virtue in Buddhism.

Śīla (Sanskrit) or sīla (Pāli) is the concept of «moral virtues», that is the second group and an integral part of the Noble Eightfold Path.[210] It generally consists of right speech, right action and right livelihood.[210]

One of the most basic forms of ethics in Buddhism is the taking of «precepts». This includes the Five Precepts for laypeople, Eight or Ten Precepts for monastic life, as well as rules of Dhamma (Vinaya or Patimokkha) adopted by a monastery.[224][225]

Other important elements of Buddhist ethics include giving or charity (dāna), Mettā (Good-Will), Heedfulness (Appamada), ‘self-respect’ (Hri) and ‘regard for consequences’ (Apatrapya).

Precepts

Buddhist scriptures explain the five precepts (Pali: pañcasīla; Sanskrit: pañcaśīla) as the minimal standard of Buddhist morality.[211] It is the most important system of morality in Buddhism, together with the monastic rules.[226]

The five precepts are seen as a basic training applicable to all Buddhists. They are:[224][227][228]

  1. «I undertake the training-precept (sikkha-padam) to abstain from onslaught on breathing beings.» This includes ordering or causing someone else to kill. The Pali suttas also say one should not «approve of others killing» and that one should be «scrupulous, compassionate, trembling for the welfare of all living beings.»[229]
  2. «I undertake the training-precept to abstain from taking what is not given.» According to Harvey, this also covers fraud, cheating, forgery as well as «falsely denying that one is in debt to someone.»[230]
  3. «I undertake the training-precept to abstain from misconduct concerning sense-pleasures.» This generally refers to adultery, as well as rape and incest. It also applies to sex with those who are legally under the protection of a guardian. It is also interpreted in different ways in the varying Buddhist cultures.[231]
  4. «I undertake the training-precept to abstain from false speech.» According to Harvey this includes «any form of lying, deception or exaggeration…even non-verbal deception by gesture or other indication…or misleading statements.»[232] The precept is often also seen as including other forms of wrong speech such as «divisive speech, harsh, abusive, angry words, and even idle chatter.»[233]
  5. «I undertake the training-precept to abstain from alcoholic drink or drugs that are an opportunity for heedlessness.» According to Harvey, intoxication is seen as a way to mask rather than face the sufferings of life. It is seen as damaging to one’s mental clarity, mindfulness and ability to keep the other four precepts.[234]

Undertaking and upholding the five precepts is based on the principle of non-harming (Pāli and Sanskrit: ahiṃsa).[235] The Pali Canon recommends one to compare oneself with others, and on the basis of that, not to hurt others.[236] Compassion and a belief in karmic retribution form the foundation of the precepts.[237][238] Undertaking the five precepts is part of regular lay devotional practice, both at home and at the local temple.[239][240] However, the extent to which people keep them differs per region and time.[241][240] They are sometimes referred to as the śrāvakayāna precepts in the Mahāyāna tradition, contrasting them with the bodhisattva precepts.[242]

Vinaya

An ordination ceremony at Wat Yannawa in Bangkok. The Vinaya codes regulate the various sangha acts, including ordination.

Vinaya is the specific code of conduct for a sangha of monks or nuns. It includes the Patimokkha, a set of 227 offences including 75 rules of decorum for monks, along with penalties for transgression, in the Theravadin tradition.[243] The precise content of the Vinaya Pitaka (scriptures on the Vinaya) differs in different schools and tradition, and different monasteries set their own standards on its implementation. The list of pattimokkha is recited every fortnight in a ritual gathering of all monks.[243] Buddhist text with vinaya rules for monasteries have been traced in all Buddhist traditions, with the oldest surviving being the ancient Chinese translations.[244]

Monastic communities in the Buddhist tradition cut normal social ties to family and community, and live as «islands unto themselves».[245] Within a monastic fraternity, a sangha has its own rules.[245] A monk abides by these institutionalised rules, and living life as the vinaya prescribes it is not merely a means, but very nearly the end in itself.[245] Transgressions by a monk on Sangha vinaya rules invites enforcement, which can include temporary or permanent expulsion.[246]

Restraint and renunciation

Living at the root of a tree (trukkhamulik’anga) is one of the dhutaṅgas, a series of optional ascetic practices for Buddhist monastics.

Another important practice taught by the Buddha is the restraint of the senses (indriyasamvara). In the various graduated paths, this is usually presented as a practice which is taught prior to formal sitting meditation, and which supports meditation by weakening sense desires that are a hindrance to meditation.[247] According to Anālayo, sense restraint is when one «guards the sense doors in order to prevent sense impressions from leading to desires and discontent.»[247] This is not an avoidance of sense impression, but a kind of mindful attention towards the sense impressions which does not dwell on their main features or signs (nimitta). This is said to prevent harmful influences from entering the mind.[248] This practice is said to give rise to an inner peace and happiness which forms a basis for concentration and insight.[248]

A related Buddhist virtue and practice is renunciation, or the intent for desirelessness (nekkhamma).[249] Generally, renunciation is the giving up of actions and desires that are seen as unwholesome on the path, such as lust for sensuality and worldly things.[250] Renunciation can be cultivated in different ways. The practice of giving for example, is one form of cultivating renunciation. Another one is the giving up of lay life and becoming a monastic (bhiksu o bhiksuni).[251] Practicing celibacy (whether for life as a monk, or temporarily) is also a form of renunciation.[252] Many Jataka stories such as the focus on how the Buddha practiced renunciation in past lives.[253]

One way of cultivating renunciation taught by the Buddha is the contemplation (anupassana) of the «dangers» (or «negative consequences») of sensual pleasure (kāmānaṃ ādīnava). As part of the graduated discourse, this contemplation is taught after the practice of giving and morality.[254]

Another related practice to renunciation and sense restraint taught by the Buddha is «restraint in eating» or moderation with food, which for monks generally means not eating after noon. Devout laypersons also follow this rule during special days of religious observance (uposatha).[255] Observing the Uposatha also includes other practices dealing with renunciation, mainly the eight precepts.

For Buddhist monastics, renunciation can also be trained through several optional ascetic practices called dhutaṅga.

In different Buddhist traditions, other related practices which focus on fasting are followed.

Mindfulness and clear comprehension

The training of the faculty called «mindfulness» (Pali: sati, Sanskrit: smṛti, literally meaning «recollection, remembering») is central in Buddhism. According to Analayo, mindfulness is a full awareness of the present moment which enhances and strengthens memory.[256] The Indian Buddhist philosopher Asanga defined mindfulness thus: «It is non-forgetting by the mind with regard to the object experienced. Its function is non-distraction.»[257] According to Rupert Gethin, sati is also «an awareness of things in relation to things, and hence an awareness of their relative value.»[258]

There are different practices and exercises for training mindfulness in the early discourses, such as the four Satipaṭṭhānas (Sanskrit: smṛtyupasthāna, «establishments of mindfulness») and Ānāpānasati (Sanskrit: ānāpānasmṛti, «mindfulness of breathing»).

A closely related mental faculty, which is often mentioned side by side with mindfulness, is sampajañña («clear comprehension»). This faculty is the ability to comprehend what one is doing and is happening in the mind, and whether it is being influenced by unwholesome states or wholesome ones.[259]

Meditation – Sama-amādhi and dhyāna

A wide range of meditation practices has developed in the Buddhist traditions, but «meditation» primarily refers to the attainment of samādhi and the practice of dhyāna (Pali: jhāna). Samādhi is a calm, undistracted, unified and concentrated state of awareness. It is defined by Asanga as «one-pointedness of mind on the object to be investigated. Its function consists of giving a basis to knowledge (jñāna).»[257]
Dhyāna is «state of perfect equanimity and awareness (upekkhā-sati-parisuddhi),» reached through focused mental training.[260]

The practice of dhyāna aids in maintaining a calm mind, and avoiding disturbance of this calm mind by mindfulness of disturbing thoughts and feelings.[261][note 21]

Origins

The earliest evidence of yogis and their meditative tradition, states Karel Werner, is found in the Keśin hymn 10.136 of the Rigveda.[262] While evidence suggests meditation was practised in the centuries preceding the Buddha,[263] the meditative methodologies described in the Buddhist texts are some of the earliest among texts that have survived into the modern era.[264][265] These methodologies likely incorporate what existed before the Buddha as well as those first developed within Buddhism.[266][note 22]

There is no scholarly agreement on the origin and source of the practice of dhyāna. Some scholars, like Bronkhorst, see the four dhyānas as a Buddhist invention.[270] Alexander Wynne argues that the Buddha learned dhyāna from Brahmanical teachers.[271]

Whatever the case, the Buddha taught meditation with a new focus and interpretation, particularly through the four dhyānas methodology,[272] in which mindfulness is maintained.[273][274] Further, the focus of meditation and the underlying theory of liberation guiding the meditation has been different in Buddhism.[263][275][276] For example, states Bronkhorst, the verse 4.4.23 of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad with its «become calm, subdued, quiet, patiently enduring, concentrated, one sees soul in oneself» is most probably a meditative state.[277] The Buddhist discussion of meditation is without the concept of soul and the discussion criticises both the ascetic meditation of Jainism and the «real self, soul» meditation of Hinduism.[278]

The formless attainments

Often grouped into the jhāna-scheme are four other meditative states, referred to in the early texts as arupa samāpattis (formless attainments). These are also referred to in commentarial literature as immaterial/formless jhānas (arūpajhānas). The first formless attainment is a place or realm of infinite space (ākāsānañcāyatana) without form or colour or shape. The second is termed the realm of infinite consciousness (viññāṇañcāyatana); the third is the realm of nothingness (ākiñcaññāyatana), while the fourth is the realm of «neither perception nor non-perception».[279] The four rupa-jhānas in Buddhist practice lead to rebirth in successfully better rupa Brahma heavenly realms, while arupa-jhānas lead into arupa heavens.[280][281]

Meditation and insight

In the Pali canon, the Buddha outlines two meditative qualities which are mutually supportive: samatha (Pāli; Sanskrit: śamatha; «calm») and vipassanā (Sanskrit: vipaśyanā, insight).[282] The Buddha compares these mental qualities to a «swift pair of messengers» who together help deliver the message of nibbana (SN 35.245).[283]

The various Buddhist traditions generally see Buddhist meditation as being divided into those two main types.[284][285] Samatha is also called «calming meditation», and focuses on stilling and concentrating the mind i.e. developing samadhi and the four dhyānas. According to Damien Keown, vipassanā meanwhile, focuses on «the generation of penetrating and critical insight (paññā)».[286]

There are numerous doctrinal positions and disagreements within the different Buddhist traditions regarding these qualities or forms of meditation. For example, in the Pali Four Ways to Arahantship Sutta (AN 4.170), it is said that one can develop calm and then insight, or insight and then calm, or both at the same time.[287] Meanwhile, in Vasubandhu’s Abhidharmakośakārikā, vipaśyanā is said to be practiced once one has reached samadhi by cultivating the four foundations of mindfulness (smṛtyupasthānas).[288]

Beginning with comments by La Vallee Poussin, a series of scholars have argued that these two meditation types reflect a tension between two different ancient Buddhist traditions regarding the use of dhyāna, one which focused on insight based practice and the other which focused purely on dhyāna.[289][290] However, other scholars such as Analayo and Rupert Gethin have disagreed with this «two paths» thesis, instead seeing both of these practices as complementary.[290][291]

The Brahma-vihara

gilded statue of Buddha in Wat Phra Si Rattana Mahathat, Thailand

The four immeasurables or four abodes, also called Brahma-viharas, are virtues or directions for meditation in Buddhist traditions, which helps a person be reborn in the heavenly (Brahma) realm.[292][293][294] These are traditionally believed to be a characteristic of the deity Brahma and the heavenly abode he resides in.[295]

The four Brahma-vihara are:

  1. Loving-kindness (Pāli: mettā, Sanskrit: maitrī) is active good will towards all;[293][296]
  2. Compassion (Pāli and Sanskrit: karuṇā) results from metta; it is identifying the suffering of others as one’s own;[293][296]
  3. Empathetic joy (Pāli and Sanskrit: muditā): is the feeling of joy because others are happy, even if one did not contribute to it; it is a form of sympathetic joy;[296]
  4. Equanimity (Pāli: upekkhā, Sanskrit: upekṣā): is even-mindedness and serenity, treating everyone impartially.[293][296]

Tantra, visualization and the subtle body

An 18th century Mongolian miniature which depicts the generation of the Vairocana Mandala

A section of the Northern wall mural at the Lukhang Temple depicting tummo, the three channels (nadis) and phowa

Some Buddhist traditions, especially those associated with Tantric Buddhism (also known as Vajrayana and Secret Mantra) use images and symbols of deities and Buddhas in meditation. This is generally done by mentally visualizing a Buddha image (or some other mental image, like a symbol, a mandala, a syllable, etc.), and using that image to cultivate calm and insight. One may also visualize and identify oneself with the imagined deity.[297][298] While visualization practices have been particularly popular in Vajrayana, they may also found in Mahayana and Theravada traditions.[299]

In Tibetan Buddhism, unique tantric techniques which include visualization (but also mantra recitation, mandalas, and other elements) are considered to be much more effective than non-tantric meditations and they are one of the most popular meditation methods.[300] The methods of Unsurpassable Yoga Tantra, (anuttarayogatantra) are in turn seen as the highest and most advanced. Anuttarayoga practice is divided into two stages, the Generation Stage and the Completion Stage. In the Generation Stage, one meditates on emptiness and visualizes oneself as a deity as well as visualizing its mandala. The focus is on developing clear appearance and divine pride (the understanding that oneself and the deity are one).[301] This method is also known as deity yoga (devata yoga). There are numerous meditation deities (yidam) used, each with a mandala, a circular symbolic map used in meditation.[302]

Insight and knowledge

Prajñā (Sanskrit) or paññā (Pāli) is wisdom, or knowledge of the true nature of existence. Another term which is associated with prajñā and sometimes is equivalent to it is vipassanā (Pāli) or vipaśyanā (Sanskrit), which is often translated as «insight». In Buddhist texts, the faculty of insight is often said to be cultivated through the four establishments of mindfulness.[303] In the early texts, Paññā is included as one of the «five faculties» (indriya) which are commonly listed as important spiritual elements to be cultivated (see for example: AN I 16). Paññā along with samadhi, is also listed as one of the «trainings in the higher states of mind» (adhicittasikkha).[303]

The Buddhist tradition regards ignorance (avidyā), a fundamental ignorance, misunderstanding or mis-perception of the nature of reality, as one of the basic causes of dukkha and samsara. Overcoming this ignorance is part of the path to awakening. This overcoming includes the contemplation of impermanence and the non-self nature of reality,[304][305] and this develops dispassion for the objects of clinging, and liberates a being from dukkha and saṃsāra.[306][307][308]

Prajñā is important in all Buddhist traditions. It is variously described as wisdom regarding the impermanent and not-self nature of dharmas (phenomena), the functioning of karma and rebirth, and knowledge of dependent origination.[309] Likewise, vipaśyanā is described in a similar way, such as in the Paṭisambhidāmagga, where it is said to be the contemplation of things as impermanent, unsatisfactory and not-self.[310]

Devotion

Tibetan Buddhist prostration practice at Jokhang, Tibet

Most forms of Buddhism «consider saddhā (Skt śraddhā), ‘trustful confidence’ or ‘faith’, as a quality which must be balanced by wisdom, and as a preparation for, or accompaniment of, meditation.»[311] Because of this devotion (Skt. bhakti; Pali: bhatti) is an important part of the practice of most Buddhists.[312] Devotional practices include ritual prayer, prostration, offerings, pilgrimage, and chanting.[313] Buddhist devotion is usually focused on some object, image or location that is seen as holy or spiritually influential. Examples of objects of devotion include paintings or statues of Buddhas and bodhisattvas, stupas, and bodhi trees.[314] Public group chanting for devotional and ceremonial is common to all Buddhist traditions and goes back to ancient India where chanting aided in the memorization of the orally transmitted teachings.[315] Rosaries called malas are used in all Buddhist traditions to count repeated chanting of common formulas or mantras. Chanting is thus a type of devotional group meditation which leads to tranquility and communicates the Buddhist teachings.[316]

Vegetarianism and animal ethics

Vegetarian meal at Buddhist temple. East Asian Buddhism tends to promote vegetarianism.

Based on the Indian principle of ahimsa (non-harming), the Buddha’s ethics strongly condemn the harming of all sentient beings, including all animals. He thus condemned the animal sacrifice of the Brahmins as well hunting, and killing animals for food.[317] However, early Buddhist texts depict the Buddha as allowing monastics to eat meat. This seems to be because monastics begged for their food and thus were supposed to accept whatever food was offered to them.[318] This was tempered by the rule that meat had to be «three times clean»: «they had not seen, had not heard, and had no reason to suspect that the animal had been killed so that the meat could be given to them».[319] Also, while the Buddha did not explicitly promote vegetarianism in his discourses, he did state that gaining one’s livelihood from the meat trade was unethical.[320] In contrast to this, various Mahayana sutras and texts like the Mahaparinirvana sutra, Surangama sutra and the Lankavatara sutra state that the Buddha promoted vegetarianism out of compassion.[321] Indian Mahayana thinkers like Shantideva promoted the avoidance of meat.[322] Throughout history, the issue of whether Buddhists should be vegetarian has remained a much debated topic and there is a variety of opinions on this issue among modern Buddhists.

Buddhist texts

A depiction of the supposed First Buddhist council at Rajgir. Communal recitation was one of the original ways of transmitting and preserving Early Buddhist texts.

Buddhism, like all Indian religions, was initially an oral tradition in ancient times.[323] The Buddha’s words, the early doctrines, concepts, and their traditional interpretations were orally transmitted from one generation to the next. The earliest oral texts were transmitted in Middle Indo-Aryan languages called Prakrits, such as Pali, through the use of communal recitation and other mnemonic techniques.[324] The first Buddhist canonical texts were likely written down in Sri Lanka, about 400 years after the Buddha died.[323] The texts were part of the Tripitakas, and many versions appeared thereafter claiming to be the words of the Buddha. Scholarly Buddhist commentary texts, with named authors, appeared in India, around the 2nd century CE.[323] These texts were written in Pali or Sanskrit, sometimes regional languages, as palm-leaf manuscripts, birch bark, painted scrolls, carved into temple walls, and later on paper.[323]

Unlike what the Bible is to Christianity and the Quran is to Islam, but like all major ancient Indian religions, there is no consensus among the different Buddhist traditions as to what constitutes the scriptures or a common canon in Buddhism.[323] The general belief among Buddhists is that the canonical corpus is vast.[325][326][327] This corpus includes the ancient Sutras organised into Nikayas or Agamas, itself the part of three basket of texts called the Tripitakas.[328] Each Buddhist tradition has its own collection of texts, much of which is translation of ancient Pali and Sanskrit Buddhist texts of India. The Chinese Buddhist canon, for example, includes 2184 texts in 55 volumes, while the Tibetan canon comprises 1108 texts – all claimed to have been spoken by the Buddha – and another 3461 texts composed by Indian scholars revered in the Tibetan tradition.[329] The Buddhist textual history is vast; over 40,000 manuscripts – mostly Buddhist, some non-Buddhist – were discovered in 1900 in the Dunhuang Chinese cave alone.[329]

Early Buddhist texts

Gandhara birchbark scroll fragments (c. 1st century) from British Library Collection

The Early Buddhist Texts refers to the literature which is considered by modern scholars to be the earliest Buddhist material. The first four Pali Nikayas, and the corresponding Chinese Āgamas are generally considered to be among the earliest material.[330][331][332] Apart from these, there are also fragmentary collections of EBT materials in other languages such as Sanskrit, Khotanese, Tibetan and Gāndhārī. The modern study of early Buddhism often relies on comparative scholarship using these various early Buddhist sources to identify parallel texts and common doctrinal content.[333] One feature of these early texts are literary structures which reflect oral transmission, such as widespread repetition.[334]

The Tripitakas

After the development of the different early Buddhist schools, these schools began to develop their own textual collections, which were termed Tripiṭakas (Triple Baskets).[335]

Many early Tripiṭakas, like the Pāli Tipitaka, were divided into three sections: Vinaya Pitaka (focuses on monastic rule), Sutta Pitaka (Buddhist discourses) and Abhidhamma Pitaka, which contain expositions and commentaries on the doctrine. The Pāli Tipitaka (also known as the Pali Canon) of the Theravada School constitutes the only complete collection of Buddhist texts in an Indic language which has survived until today.[336] However, many Sutras, Vinayas and Abhidharma works from other schools survive in Chinese translation, as part of the Chinese Buddhist Canon. According to some sources, some early schools of Buddhism had five or seven pitakas.[337]

Mahāyāna texts

Tripiṭaka Koreana in South Korea, over 81,000 wood printing blocks stored in racks

The Mahāyāna sūtras are a very broad genre of Buddhist scriptures that the Mahāyāna Buddhist tradition holds are original teachings of the Buddha. Modern historians generally hold that the first of these texts were composed probably around the 1st century BCE or 1st century CE.[338][339][340] In Mahāyāna, these texts are generally given greater authority than the early Āgamas and Abhidharma literature, which are called «Śrāvakayāna» or «Hinayana» to distinguish them from Mahāyāna sūtras.[341] Mahāyāna traditions mainly see these different classes of texts as being designed for different types of persons, with different levels of spiritual understanding. The Mahāyāna sūtras are mainly seen as being for those of «greater» capacity.[342][better source needed] Mahāyāna also has a very large literature of philosophical and exegetical texts. These are often called śāstra (treatises) or vrittis (commentaries). Some of this literature was also written in verse form (karikās), the most famous of which is the Mūlamadhyamika-karikā (Root Verses on the Middle Way) by Nagarjuna, the foundational text of the Madhyamika school.

Tantric texts

During the Gupta Empire, a new class of Buddhist sacred literature began to develop, which are called the Tantras.[343] By the 8th century, the tantric tradition was very influential in India and beyond. Besides drawing on a Mahāyāna Buddhist framework, these texts also borrowed deities and material from other Indian religious traditions, such as the Śaiva and Pancharatra traditions, local god/goddess cults, and local spirit worship (such as yaksha or nāga spirits).[344][345]

Some features of these texts include the widespread use of mantras, meditation on the subtle body, worship of fierce deities, and antinomian and transgressive practices such as ingesting alcohol and performing sexual rituals.[346][347][348]

History

Historical roots

Historically, the roots of Buddhism lie in the religious thought of Iron Age India around the middle of the first millennium BCE.[349] This was a period of great intellectual ferment and socio-cultural change known as the «Second urbanisation», marked by the growth of towns and trade, the composition of the Upanishads and the historical emergence of the Śramaṇa traditions.[350][351][note 23]

New ideas developed both in the Vedic tradition in the form of the Upanishads, and outside of the Vedic tradition through the Śramaṇa movements.[354][355][356] The term Śramaṇa refers to several Indian religious movements parallel to but separate from the historical Vedic religion, including Buddhism, Jainism and others such as Ājīvika.[357]

Several Śramaṇa movements are known to have existed in India before the 6th century BCE (pre-Buddha, pre-Mahavira), and these influenced both the āstika and nāstika traditions of Indian philosophy.[358] According to Martin Wilshire, the Śramaṇa tradition evolved in India over two phases, namely Paccekabuddha and Savaka phases, the former being the tradition of individual ascetic and the latter of disciples, and that Buddhism and Jainism ultimately emerged from these.[359] Brahmanical and non-Brahmanical ascetic groups shared and used several similar ideas,[360] but the Śramaṇa traditions also drew upon already established Brahmanical concepts and philosophical roots, states Wiltshire, to formulate their own doctrines.[358][361] Brahmanical motifs can be found in the oldest Buddhist texts, using them to introduce and explain Buddhist ideas.[362] For example, prior to Buddhist developments, the Brahmanical tradition internalised and variously reinterpreted the three Vedic sacrificial fires as concepts such as Truth, Rite, Tranquility or Restraint.[363] Buddhist texts also refer to the three Vedic sacrificial fires, reinterpreting and explaining them as ethical conduct.[364]

The Śramaṇa religions challenged and broke with the Brahmanic tradition on core assumptions such as Atman (soul, self), Brahman, the nature of afterlife, and they rejected the authority of the Vedas and Upanishads.[365][366][367] Buddhism was one among several Indian religions that did so.[367]

Early buddhist positions in the Theravada tradition had not established any deities, but were epistemologically cautious rather than directly atheist. Later buddhist traditions were more influenced by the critique of deities within Hinduism and therefore more committed to a strongly atheist stance. These developments were historic and epistemological as documented in verses from Śāntideva’s Bodhicaryāvatāra, and supplemented by reference to suttas and jātakas from the Pali canon.[368]

Indian Buddhism

The history of Indian Buddhism may be divided into five periods:[369] Early Buddhism (occasionally called pre-sectarian Buddhism), Nikaya Buddhism or Sectarian Buddhism: The period of the early Buddhist schools, Early Mahayana Buddhism, Late Mahayana, and the era of Vajrayana or the «Tantric Age».

Pre-sectarian Buddhism

According to Lambert Schmithausen Pre-sectarian Buddhism is «the canonical period prior to the development of different schools with their different positions.»[370]

The early Buddhist Texts include the four principal Pali Nikāyas [note 24] (and their parallel Agamas found in the Chinese canon) together with the main body of monastic rules, which survive in the various versions of the patimokkha.[371][372][373] However, these texts were revised over time, and it is unclear what constitutes the earliest layer of Buddhist teachings. One method to obtain information on the oldest core of Buddhism is to compare the oldest extant versions of the Theravadin Pāli Canon and other texts.[note 25] The reliability of the early sources, and the possibility to draw out a core of oldest teachings, is a matter of dispute.[376] According to Vetter, inconsistencies remain, and other methods must be applied to resolve those inconsistencies.[374][note 26]

According to Schmithausen, three positions held by scholars of Buddhism can be distinguished:[380]

  1. «Stress on the fundamental homogeneity and substantial authenticity of at least a considerable part of the Nikayic materials;»[note 27]
  2. «Scepticism with regard to the possibility of retrieving the doctrine of earliest Buddhism;»[note 28]
  3. «Cautious optimism in this respect.»[note 29]
The Core teachings

According to Mitchell, certain basic teachings appear in many places throughout the early texts, which has led most scholars to conclude that Gautama Buddha must have taught something similar to the Four Noble Truths, the Noble Eightfold Path, Nirvana, the three marks of existence, the five aggregates, dependent origination, karma and rebirth.[386]

According to N. Ross Reat, all of these doctrines are shared by the Theravada Pali texts and the Mahasamghika school’s Śālistamba Sūtra.[387] A recent study by Bhikkhu Analayo concludes that the Theravada Majjhima Nikaya and Sarvastivada Madhyama Agama contain mostly the same major doctrines.[388] Richard Salomon, in his study of the Gandharan texts (which are the earliest manuscripts containing early discourses), has confirmed that their teachings are «consistent with non-Mahayana Buddhism, which survives today in the Theravada school of Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia, but which in ancient times was represented by eighteen separate schools.»[389]

However, some scholars argue that critical analysis reveals discrepancies among the various doctrines found in these early texts, which point to alternative possibilities for early Buddhism.[390][391][392] The authenticity of certain teachings and doctrines have been questioned. For example, some scholars think that karma was not central to the teaching of the historical Buddha, while other disagree with this position.[393][394] Likewise, there is scholarly disagreement on whether insight was seen as liberating in early Buddhism or whether it was a later addition to the practice of the four jhānas.[377][395][396] Scholars such as Bronkhorst also think that the four noble truths may not have been formulated in earliest Buddhism, and did not serve in earliest Buddhism as a description of «liberating insight».[397] According to Vetter, the description of the Buddhist path may initially have been as simple as the term «the middle way».[132] In time, this short description was elaborated, resulting in the description of the eightfold path.[132]

Ashokan Era and the early schools

According to numerous Buddhist scriptures, soon after the parinirvāṇa (from Sanskrit: «highest extinguishment») of Gautama Buddha, the first Buddhist council was held to collectively recite the teachings to ensure that no errors occurred in oral transmission. Many modern scholars question the historicity of this event.[398] However, Richard Gombrich states that the monastic assembly recitations of the Buddha’s teaching likely began during Buddha’s lifetime, and they served a similar role of codifying the teachings.[399]

The so called Second Buddhist council resulted in the first schism in the Sangha. Modern scholars believe that this was probably caused when a group of reformists called Sthaviras («elders») sought to modify the Vinaya (monastic rule), and this caused a split with the conservatives who rejected this change, they were called Mahāsāṃghikas.[400][401] While most scholars accept that this happened at some point, there is no agreement on the dating, especially if it dates to before or after the reign of Ashoka.[402]

Map of the Buddhist missions during the reign of Ashoka according to the Edicts of Ashoka

Buddhism may have spread only slowly throughout India until the time of the Mauryan emperor Ashoka (304–232 BCE), who was a public supporter of the religion. The support of Aśoka and his descendants led to the construction of more stūpas (such as at Sanchi and Bharhut), temples (such as the Mahabodhi Temple) and to its spread throughout the Maurya Empire and into neighbouring lands such as Central Asia and to the island of Sri Lanka.

During and after the Mauryan period (322–180 BCE), the Sthavira community gave rise to several schools, one of which was the Theravada school which tended to congregate in the south and another which was the Sarvāstivāda school, which was mainly in north India. Likewise, the Mahāsāṃghika groups also eventually split into different Sanghas. Originally, these schisms were caused by disputes over monastic disciplinary codes of various fraternities, but eventually, by about 100 CE if not earlier, schisms were being caused by doctrinal disagreements too.[403]

Following (or leading up to) the schisms, each Saṅgha started to accumulate their own version of Tripiṭaka (triple basket of texts).[60][404] In their Tripiṭaka, each school included the Suttas of the Buddha, a Vinaya basket (disciplinary code) and some schools also added an Abhidharma basket which were texts on detailed scholastic classification, summary and interpretation of the Suttas.[60][405] The doctrine details in the Abhidharmas of various Buddhist schools differ significantly, and these were composed starting about the third century BCE and through the 1st millennium CE.[406][407][408]

Post-Ashokan expansion

Extent of Buddhism and trade routes in the 1st century CE

According to the edicts of Aśoka, the Mauryan emperor sent emissaries to various countries west of India to spread «Dharma», particularly in eastern provinces of the neighbouring Seleucid Empire, and even farther to Hellenistic kingdoms of the Mediterranean. It is a matter of disagreement among scholars whether or not these emissaries were accompanied by Buddhist missionaries.[409]

Buddhist expansion throughout Asia

In central and west Asia, Buddhist influence grew, through Greek-speaking Buddhist monarchs and ancient Asian trade routes, a phenomenon known as Greco-Buddhism. An example of this is evidenced in Chinese and Pali Buddhist records, such as Milindapanha and the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhāra. The Milindapanha describes a conversation between a Buddhist monk and the 2nd-century BCE Greek king Menander, after which Menander abdicates and himself goes into monastic life in the pursuit of nirvana.[410][411] Some scholars have questioned the Milindapanha version, expressing doubts whether Menander was Buddhist or just favourably disposed to Buddhist monks.[412]

The Kushan empire (30–375 CE) came to control the Silk Road trade through Central and South Asia, which brought them to interact with Gandharan Buddhism and the Buddhist institutions of these regions. The Kushans patronised Buddhism throughout their lands, and many Buddhist centers were built or renovated (the Sarvastivada school was particularly favored), especially by Emperor Kanishka (128–151 CE).[413][414] Kushan support helped Buddhism to expand into a world religion through their trade routes.[415] Buddhism spread to Khotan, the Tarim Basin, and China, eventually to other parts of the far east.[414] Some of the earliest written documents of the Buddhist faith are the Gandharan Buddhist texts, dating from about the 1st century CE, and connected to the Dharmaguptaka school.[416][417][418]

The Islamic conquest of the Iranian Plateau in the 7th-century, followed by the Muslim conquests of Afghanistan and the later establishment of the Ghaznavid kingdom with Islam as the state religion in Central Asia between the 10th- and 12th-century led to the decline and disappearance of Buddhism from most of these regions.[419]

Mahāyāna Buddhism

stone statue group, a Buddhist triad depicting, left to right, a Kushan, the future buddha Maitreya, Gautama Buddha, the bodhisattva Avalokiteśvara, and a Buddhist monk. 2nd–3rd century. Guimet Museum

The origins of Mahāyāna («Great Vehicle») Buddhism are not well understood and there are various competing theories about how and where this movement arose. Theories include the idea that it began as various groups venerating certain texts or that it arose as a strict forest ascetic movement.[420]

The first Mahāyāna works were written sometime between the 1st century BCE and the 2nd century CE.[339][420] Much of the early extant evidence for the origins of Mahāyāna comes from early Chinese translations of Mahāyāna texts, mainly those of Lokakṣema. (2nd century CE).[note 30] Some scholars have traditionally considered the earliest Mahāyāna sūtras to include the first versions of the Prajnaparamita series, along with texts concerning Akṣobhya, which were probably composed in the 1st century BCE in the south of India.[422][note 31]

There is no evidence that Mahāyāna ever referred to a separate formal school or sect of Buddhism, with a separate monastic code (Vinaya), but rather that it existed as a certain set of ideals, and later doctrines, for bodhisattvas.[424][425] Records written by Chinese monks visiting India indicate that both Mahāyāna and non-Mahāyāna monks could be found in the same monasteries, with the difference that Mahāyāna monks worshipped figures of Bodhisattvas, while non-Mahayana monks did not.[426]

Site of Nalanda University, a great center of Mahāyāna thought

Mahāyāna initially seems to have remained a small minority movement that was in tension with other Buddhist groups, struggling for wider acceptance.[427] However, during the fifth and sixth centuries CE, there seems to have been a rapid growth of Mahāyāna Buddhism, which is shown by a large increase in epigraphic and manuscript evidence in this period. However, it still remained a minority in comparison to other Buddhist schools.[428]

Mahāyāna Buddhist institutions continued to grow in influence during the following centuries, with large monastic university complexes such as Nalanda (established by the 5th-century CE Gupta emperor, Kumaragupta I) and Vikramashila (established under Dharmapala c. 783 to 820) becoming quite powerful and influential. During this period of Late Mahāyāna, four major types of thought developed: Mādhyamaka, Yogācāra, Buddha-nature (Tathāgatagarbha), and the epistemological tradition of Dignaga and Dharmakirti.[429] According to Dan Lusthaus, Mādhyamaka and Yogācāra have a great deal in common, and the commonality stems from early Buddhism.[430]

Late Indian Buddhism and Tantra

During the Gupta period (4th–6th centuries) and the empire of Harṣavardana (c. 590–647 CE), Buddhism continued to be influential in India, and large Buddhist learning institutions such as Nalanda and Valabahi Universities were at their peak.[431] Buddhism also flourished under the support of the Pāla Empire (8th–12th centuries). Under the Guptas and Palas, Tantric Buddhism or Vajrayana developed and rose to prominence. It promoted new practices such as the use of mantras, dharanis, mudras, mandalas and the visualization of deities and Buddhas and developed a new class of literature, the Buddhist Tantras. This new esoteric form of Buddhism can be traced back to groups of wandering yogi magicians called mahasiddhas.[432][433]

The question of the origins of early Vajrayana has been taken up by various scholars. David Seyfort Ruegg has suggested that Buddhist tantra employed various elements of a «pan-Indian religious substrate» which is not specifically Buddhist, Shaiva or Vaishnava.[434]

According to Indologist Alexis Sanderson, various classes of Vajrayana literature developed as a result of royal courts sponsoring both Buddhism and Saivism. Sanderson has argued that Buddhist tantras can be shown to have borrowed practices, terms, rituals and more form Shaiva tantras. He argues that Buddhist texts even directly copied various Shaiva tantras, especially the Bhairava Vidyapitha tantras.[435][436] Ronald M. Davidson meanwhile, argues that Sanderson’s claims for direct influence from Shaiva Vidyapitha texts are problematic because «the chronology of the Vidyapitha tantras is by no means so well established»[437] and that the Shaiva tradition also appropriated non-Hindu deities, texts and traditions. Thus while «there can be no question that the Buddhist tantras were heavily influenced by Kapalika and other Saiva movements» argues Davidson, «the influence was apparently mutual.»[438]

Already during this later era, Buddhism was losing state support in other regions of India, including the lands of the Karkotas, the Pratiharas, the Rashtrakutas, the Pandyas and the Pallavas. This loss of support in favor of Hindu faiths like Vaishnavism and Shaivism, is the beginning of the long and complex period of the Decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent.[439] The Islamic invasions and conquest of India (10th to 12th century), further damaged and destroyed many Buddhist institutions, leading to its eventual near disappearance from India by the 1200s.[440]

Spread to East and Southeast Asia

The Silk Road transmission of Buddhism to China is most commonly thought to have started in the late 2nd or the 1st century CE, though the literary sources are all open to question.[441][note 32] The first documented translation efforts by foreign Buddhist monks in China were in the 2nd century CE, probably as a consequence of the expansion of the Kushan Empire into the Chinese territory of the Tarim Basin.[443]

The first documented Buddhist texts translated into Chinese are those of the Parthian An Shigao (148–180 CE).[444] The first known Mahāyāna scriptural texts are translations into Chinese by the Kushan monk Lokakṣema in Luoyang, between 178 and 189 CE.[445] From China, Buddhism was introduced into its neighbours Korea (4th century), Japan (6th–7th centuries), and Vietnam (c. 1st–2nd centuries).[446][447]

During the Chinese Tang dynasty (618–907), Chinese Esoteric Buddhism was introduced from India and Chan Buddhism (Zen) became a major religion.[448][449] Chan continued to grow in the Song dynasty (960–1279) and it was during this era that it strongly influenced Korean Buddhism and Japanese Buddhism.[450] Pure Land Buddhism also became popular during this period and was often practised together with Chan.[451] It was also during the Song that the entire Chinese canon was printed using over 130,000 wooden printing blocks.[452]

During the Indian period of Esoteric Buddhism (from the 8th century onwards), Buddhism spread from India to Tibet and Mongolia. Johannes Bronkhorst states that the esoteric form was attractive because it allowed both a secluded monastic community as well as the social rites and rituals important to laypersons and to kings for the maintenance of a political state during succession and wars to resist invasion.[453] During the Middle Ages, Buddhism slowly declined in India,[454] while it vanished from Persia and Central Asia as Islam became the state religion.[455][456]

The Theravada school arrived in Sri Lanka sometime in the 3rd century BCE. Sri Lanka became a base for its later spread to Southeast Asia after the 5th century CE (Myanmar, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia and coastal Vietnam).[457][458] Theravada Buddhism was the dominant religion in Burma during the Mon Hanthawaddy Kingdom (1287–1552).[459] It also became dominant in the Khmer Empire during the 13th and 14th centuries and in the Thai Sukhothai Kingdom during the reign of Ram Khamhaeng (1237/1247–1298).[460][461]

Schools and traditions

color map showing Buddhism is a major religion worldwide

Distribution of major Buddhist traditions

Buddhists generally classify themselves as either Theravāda or Mahāyāna.[462] This classification is also used by some scholars[463] and is the one ordinarily used in the English language.[web 6] An alternative scheme used by some scholars divides Buddhism into the following three traditions or geographical or cultural areas: Theravāda (or «Southern Buddhism», «South Asian Buddhism»), East Asian Buddhism (or just «Eastern Buddhism») and Indo-Tibetan Buddhism (or «Northern Buddhism»).[note 33]

Buddhists of various traditions, Yeunten Ling Tibetan Institute

Some scholars[note 34] use other schemes. Buddhists themselves have a variety of other schemes. Hinayana (literally «lesser or inferior vehicle») is sometimes used by Mahāyāna followers to name the family of early philosophical schools and traditions from which contemporary Theravāda emerged, but as the Hinayana term is considered derogatory, a variety of other terms are used instead, including: Śrāvakayāna, Nikaya Buddhism, early Buddhist schools, sectarian Buddhism and conservative Buddhism.[464][465]

Not all traditions of Buddhism share the same philosophical outlook, or treat the same concepts as central. Each tradition, however, does have its own core concepts, and some comparisons can be drawn between them:[466][467]

  • Both Theravāda and Mahāyāna accept and revere the Buddha Sakyamuni as the founder, Mahāyāna also reveres numerous other Buddhas, such as Amitabha or Vairocana as well as many other bodhisattvas not revered in Theravāda.
  • Both accept the Middle Way, Dependent origination, the Four Noble Truths, the Noble Eightfold Path, the Three Jewels, the Three marks of existence and the Bodhipakṣadharmas (aids to awakening).
  • Mahāyāna focuses mainly on the bodhisattva path to Buddhahood which it sees as universal and to be practiced by all persons, while Theravāda does not focus on teaching this path and teaches the attainment of arhatship as a worthy goal to strive towards. The bodhisattva path is not denied in Theravāda, it is generally seen as a long and difficult path suitable for only a few.[468] Thus the Bodhisattva path is normative in Mahāyāna, while it is an optional path for a heroic few in Theravāda.[469]
  • Mahāyāna sees the arhat’s nirvana as being imperfect and inferior or preliminary to full Buddhahood. It sees arhatship as selfish, since bodhisattvas vow to save all beings while arhats save only themselves.[470] Theravāda meanwhile does not accept that the arhat’s nirvana is an inferior or preliminary attainment, nor that it is a selfish deed to attain arhatship since not only are arhats described as compassionate but they have destroyed the root of greed, the sense of «I am».[469]
  • Mahāyāna accepts the authority of the many Mahāyāna sutras along with the other Nikaya texts like the Agamas and the Pali canon (though it sees Mahāyāna texts as primary), while Theravāda does not accept that the Mahāyāna sutras are buddhavacana (word of the Buddha) at all.[471]

Monasteries and temples

Buddhist institutions are often housed and centered around monasteries (Sanskrit:viharas) and temples. Buddhist monastics originally followed a life of wandering, never staying in one place for long. During the three month rainy season (vassa) they would gather together in one place for a period of intense practice and then depart again.[472][473] Some of the earliest Buddhist monasteries were at groves (vanas) or woods (araññas), such as Jetavana and Sarnath’s Deer Park. There originally seems to have been two main types of monasteries, monastic settlements (sangharamas) were built and supported by donors, and woodland camps (avasas) were set up by monks. Whatever structures were built in these locales were made out of wood and were sometimes temporary structures built for the rainy season.[474][475] Over time, the wandering community slowly adopted more settled cenobitic forms of monasticism.[476]

There are many different forms of Buddhist structures. Classic Indian Buddhist institutions mainly made use of the following structures: monasteries, rock-hewn cave complexes (such as the Ajanta Caves), stupas (funerary mounds which contained relics), and temples such as the Mahabodhi Temple.[477] In Southeast Asia, the most widespread institutions are centered on wats. East Asian Buddhist institutions also use various structures including monastic halls, temples, lecture halls, bell towers and pagodas. In Japanese Buddhist temples, these different structures are usually grouped together in an area termed the garan. In Indo-Tibetan Buddhism, Buddhist institutions are generally housed in gompas. They include monastic quarters, stupas and prayer halls with Buddha images. In the modern era, the Buddhist «meditation centre», which is mostly used by laypersons and often also staffed by them, has also become widespread.[478]

Buddhism in the modern era

Buddhist monk in Siberia in robes leaning on railing looking at temple

Colonial era

Buddhism has faced various challenges and changes during the colonisation of Buddhist states by Christian countries and its persecution under modern states. Like other religions, the findings of modern science has challenged its basic premises. One response to some of these challenges has come to be called Buddhist modernism. Early Buddhist modernist figures such as the American convert Henry Olcott (1832–1907) and Anagarika Dharmapala (1864–1933) reinterpreted and promoted Buddhism as a scientific and rational religion which they saw as compatible with modern science.[479]

East Asian Buddhism meanwhile suffered under various wars which ravaged China during the modern era, such as the Taiping rebellion and World War II (which also affected Korean Buddhism). During the Republican period (1912–49), a new movement called Humanistic Buddhism was developed by figures such as Taixu (1899–1947), and though Buddhist institutions were destroyed during the Cultural Revolution (1966–76), there has been a revival of the religion in China after 1977.[480] Japanese Buddhism also went through a period of modernisation during the Meiji period.[481] In Central Asia meanwhile, the arrival of Communist repression to Tibet (1966–1980) and Mongolia (between 1924 and 1990) had a strong negative impact on Buddhist institutions, though the situation has improved somewhat since the 80s and 90s.[482]

Buddhism in the West

While there were some encounters of Western travellers or missionaries such as St. Francis Xavier and Ippolito Desideri with Buddhist cultures, it was not until the 19th century that Buddhism began to be studied by Western scholars. It was the work of pioneering scholars such as Eugène Burnouf, Max Müller, Hermann Oldenberg and Thomas William Rhys Davids that paved the way for modern Buddhist studies in the West. The English words such as Buddhism, «Boudhist», «Bauddhist» and Buddhist were coined in the early 19th-century in the West,[483] while in 1881, Rhys Davids founded the Pali Text Society – an influential Western resource of Buddhist literature in the Pali language and one of the earliest publisher of a journal on Buddhist studies.[484] It was also during the 19th century that Asian Buddhist immigrants (mainly from China and Japan) began to arrive in Western countries such as the United States and Canada, bringing with them their Buddhist religion. This period also saw the first Westerners to formally convert to Buddhism, such as Helena Blavatsky and Henry Steel Olcott.[485] An important event in the introduction of Buddhism to the West was the 1893 World Parliament of Religions, which for the first time saw well-publicized speeches by major Buddhist leaders alongside other religious leaders.

The 20th century saw a prolific growth of new Buddhist institutions in Western countries, including the Buddhist Society, London (1924), Das Buddhistische Haus (1924) and Datsan Gunzechoinei in St Petersburg. The publication and translations of Buddhist literature in Western languages thereafter accelerated. After the second world war, further immigration from Asia, globalisation, the secularisation on Western culture as well a renewed interest in Buddhism among the 60s counterculture led to further growth in Buddhist institutions.[486] Influential figures on post-war Western Buddhism include Shunryu Suzuki, Jack Kerouac, Alan Watts, Thích Nhất Hạnh, and the 14th Dalai Lama. While Buddhist institutions have grown, some of the central premises of Buddhism such as the cycles of rebirth and Four Noble Truths have been problematic in the West.[487][488][489] In contrast, states Christopher Gowans, for «most ordinary [Asian] Buddhists, today as well as in the past, their basic moral orientation is governed by belief in karma and rebirth».[490] Most Asian Buddhist laypersons, states Kevin Trainor, have historically pursued Buddhist rituals and practices seeking better rebirth,[491] not nirvana or freedom from rebirth.[492]

Buddha statue in 1896, Bamiyan

After statue destroyed by Islamist Taliban in 2001

Buddhism has spread across the world,[494][495] and Buddhist texts are increasingly translated into local languages. While Buddhism in the West is often seen as exotic and progressive, in the East it is regarded as familiar and traditional. In countries such as Cambodia and Bhutan, it is recognised as the state religion and receives government support.

In certain regions such as Afghanistan and Pakistan, militants have targeted violence and destruction of historic Buddhist monuments.[496][497]

Neo-Buddhism movements

A number of modern movements in Buddhism emerged during the second half of the 20th century.[498][499] These new forms of Buddhism are diverse and significantly depart from traditional beliefs and practices.[500]

In India, B.R. Ambedkar launched the Navayana tradition – literally, «new vehicle». Ambedkar’s Buddhism rejects the foundational doctrines and historic practices of traditional Theravada and Mahayana traditions, such as monk lifestyle after renunciation, karma, rebirth, samsara, meditation, nirvana, Four Noble Truths and others.[501][502][503] Ambedkar’s Navayana Buddhism considers these as superstitions and re-interprets the original Buddha as someone who taught about class struggle and social equality.[504][505] Ambedkar urged low caste Indian Dalits to convert to his Marxism-inspired[503] reinterpretation called the Navayana Buddhism, also known as Bhimayana Buddhism. Ambedkar’s effort led to the expansion of Navayana Buddhism in India.[506][504]

The Thai King Mongkut (r. 1851–68), and his son Chulalongkorn (r. 1868–1910), were responsible for modern reforms of Thai Buddhism.[507] Modern Buddhist movements include Secular Buddhism in many countries, Won Buddhism in Korea, the Dhammakaya movement in Thailand and several Japanese organisations, such as Shinnyo-en, Risshō Kōsei Kai or Soka Gakkai.

Some of these movements have brought internal disputes and strife within regional Buddhist communities. For example, the Dhammakaya movement in Thailand teaches a «true self» doctrine, which traditional Theravada monks consider as heretically denying the fundamental anatta (not-self) doctrine of Buddhism.[508][509][510]

Sexual abuse and misconduct

Buddhism has not been immune from sexual abuse and misconduct scandals, with victims coming forward in various Buddhist schools such as Zen and Tibetan.[511][512][513][514] «There are huge cover ups in the Catholic church, but what has happened within Tibetan Buddhism is totally along the same lines,» says Mary Finnigan, an author and journalist who has been chronicling such alleged abuses since the mid-80s.[515] One notably covered case in media of various Western countries was that of Sogyal Rinpoche which began in 1994,[516] and ended with his retirement from his position as Rigpa’s spiritual director in 2017.[517]

Cultural influence

Buddhism has had a profound influence on various cultures, especially in Asia. Buddhist philosophy, Buddhist art, Buddhist architecture, Buddhist cuisine and Buddhist festivals continue to be influential elements of the modern Culture of Asia, especially in East Asia and the Sinosphere as well as in Southeast Asia and the Indosphere. According to Litian Fang, Buddhism has «permeated a wide range of fields, such as politics, ethics, philosophy, literature, art and customs,» in these Asian regions.[518] Buddhist teachings influenced the development of modern Hinduism as well as other Asian religions like Taoism and Confucianism. Buddhist philosophers like Dignaga and Dharmakirti were very influential in the development of Indian logic and epistemology.[519] Buddhist educational institutions like Nalanda and Vikramashila preserved various disciplines of classical Indian knowledge such as grammar, astronomy/astrology and medicine and taught foreign students from Asia.[520]

In the Western world, Buddhism has had a strong influence on modern New Age spirituality and other alternative spiritualities. This began with its influence on 20th century Theosophists such as Helena Blavatsky, which were some of the first Westerners to take Buddhism seriously as a spiritual tradition.[521] More recently, Buddhist meditation practices have influenced the development of modern psychology, particularly the practice of Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and other similar mindfulness based modalities.[522][523] The influence of Buddhism on psychology can also be seen in certain forms of modern psychoanalysis.[524][525]

Shamanism is a widespread practice in some Buddhist societies. Buddhist monasteries have long existed alongside local shamanic traditions. Lacking an institutional orthodoxy, Buddhists adapted to the local cultures, blending their own traditions with pre-existing shamanic culture. Research into Himalayan religion has shown that Buddhist and shamanic traditions overlap in many respects: the worship of localized deities, healing rituals and exorcisms. The shamanic Gurung people have adopted some of the Buddhist beliefs such and rebirth but maintain the shamanic rites of «guiding the soul» after death.

Demographics

Purple Percentage of Buddhists by country, showing high in Burma to low in United States

Buddhism is practised by an estimated 488 million,[7] 495 million,[526] or 535 million[527] people as of the 2010s, representing 7% to 8% of the world’s total population. China is the country with the largest population of Buddhists, approximately 244 million or 18% of its total population.[7][note 35] They are mostly followers of Chinese schools of Mahayana, making this the largest body of Buddhist traditions. Mahayana, also practised in broader East Asia, is followed by over half of world Buddhists.[7]

Buddhism is the dominant religion in Thailand, Cambodia, Tibet, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Laos, Mongolia, Japan,[529] Hong Kong,[530] Macau,[531] Singapore,[532] and Vietnam. [533] Large Buddhist populations live in Mainland China, Taiwan, North Korea, Nepal and South Korea.[534] In Russia, Buddhists form majority in Tuva (52%) and Kalmykia (53%). Buryatia (20%) and Zabaykalsky Krai (15%) also have significant Buddhist populations.[535]

Buddhism is also growing by conversion. In New Zealand, about 25–35% of the total Buddhists are converts to Buddhism.[536][537] Buddhism has also spread to the Nordic countries; for example, the Burmese Buddhists founded in the city of Kuopio in North Savonia the first Buddhist monastery of Finland, named the Buddha Dhamma Ramsi monastery.[538]

See also

  • Akriyavada
  • Buddhism, Jainism and Bhakti movement
  • Buddha’s Dispensation
  • Buddhas and bodhisattvas in art
  • Buddhism and Eastern religions
  • Buddhism and science
  • Buddhism by country
  • Buddhist philosophy
  • Chinese folk religion
  • Criticism of Buddhism
  • Dalit Buddhist Movement
  • Iconography of Gautama Buddha in Laos and Thailand
  • Index of Buddhism-related articles
  • Jewish Buddhist
  • List of Buddhist temples
  • List of Buddhists
  • List of converts to Buddhism
  • Outline of Buddhism
  • Persecution of Buddhists
  • Shinbutsu-shūgō
  • Southern, Eastern and Northern Buddhism
  • Tengrism and Buddhism
  • Three Teachings
  • Buddhism in Central Asia
  • World Buddhist Scout Council
  • Polytheism in Buddhism
  • Monolatry
  • Buddhist modernism

Explanatory notes

  1. ^ Buddhist texts such as the Jataka tales of the Theravada Buddhist tradition, and early biographies such as the Buddhacarita, the Lokottaravādin Mahāvastu, the Sarvāstivādin Lalitavistara Sūtra, give different accounts about the life of the Buddha; many include stories of his many rebirths, and some add significant embellishments.[32][33] Keown and Prebish state, «In the past, modern scholars have generally accepted 486 or 483 BCE for this [Buddha’s death], but the consensus is now that they rest on evidence which is too flimsy.[34] Scholars are hesitant to make unqualified claims about the historical facts of the Buddha’s life. Most accept that he lived, taught and founded a monastic order, but do not consistently accept all of the details contained in his biographies.»[35][36][37][38]
  2. ^ The exact identity of this ancient place is unclear. Please see Gautama Buddha article for various sites identified.
  3. ^ Bihar is derived from Vihara, which means monastery.[39]
  4. ^ Other details about the Buddha’a background are contested in modern scholarship. For example, Buddhist texts assert that Buddha described himself as a kshatriya (warrior class), but states Gombrich, little is known about his father and there is no proof that his father even knew the term kshatriya.[42] Mahavira, whose teachings helped establish another major ancient religion Jainism, is also claimed to be ksatriya by his early followers. Further, early texts of both Jainism and Buddhism suggest they emerged in a period of urbanisation in ancient India, one with city nobles and prospering urban centres, states, agricultural surplus, trade and introduction of money.[43]
  5. ^ The earliest Buddhist biographies of the Buddha mention these Vedic-era teachers. Outside of these early Buddhist texts, these names do not appear, which has led some scholars to raise doubts about the historicity of these claims.[48][50] According to Alexander Wynne, the evidence suggests that Buddha studied under these Vedic-era teachers and they «almost certainly» taught him, but the details of his education are unclear.[48][51]
  6. ^ The Theravada tradition traces its origins as the oldest tradition holding the Pali Canon as the only authority, Mahayana tradition revers the Canon but also the derivative literature that developed in the 1st millennium CE and its roots are traceable to the 1st century BCE, while Vajrayana tradition is closer to the Mahayana, includes Tantra, is the younger of the three and traceable to the 1st millennium CE.[63][64]
  7. ^ On samsara, rebirth and redeath:
    * Paul Williams: «All rebirth is due to karma and is impermanent. Short of attaining enlightenment, in each rebirth one is born and dies, to be reborn elsewhere in accordance with the completely impersonal causal nature of one’s own karma. The endless cycle of birth, rebirth, and redeath, is samsara.»[68]
    * Buswell and Lopez on «rebirth»: «An English term that does not have an exact correlate in Buddhist languages, rendered instead by a range of technical terms, such as the Sanskrit Punarjanman (lit. «birth again») and Punabhavan (lit. «re-becoming»), and, less commonly, the related PUNARMRTYU (lit. «redeath»).»[69]

    See also Perry Schmidt-Leukel (2006) pp. 32–34,[70] John J. Makransky (1997) p. 27.[71] for the use of the term «redeath.» The term Agatigati or Agati gati (plus a few other terms) is generally translated as ‘rebirth, redeath’; see any Pali-English dictionary; e.g. pp. 94–95 of Rhys Davids & William Stede, where they list five Sutta examples with rebirth and re-death sense.[72]

  8. ^ Graham Harvey: «Siddhartha Gautama found an end to rebirth in this world of suffering. His teachings, known as the dharma in Buddhism, can be summarized in the Four Noble truths.»[74] Geoffrey Samuel (2008): «The Four Noble Truths […] describe the knowledge needed to set out on the path to liberation from rebirth.»[75] See also [76][77][78][68][79][74][80][web 1][web 2]

    The Theravada tradition holds that insight into these four truths is liberating in itself.[81] This is reflected in the Pali canon.[82] According to Donald Lopez, «The Buddha stated in his first sermon that when he gained absolute and intuitive knowledge of the four truths, he achieved complete enlightenment and freedom from future rebirth.»[web 1]

    The Maha-parinibbana Sutta also refers to this liberation.[web 3] Carol Anderson: «The second passage where the four truths appear in the Vinaya-pitaka is also found in the Mahaparinibbana-sutta (D II 90–91). Here, the Buddha explains that it is by not understanding the four truths that rebirth continues.»[83]

    On the meaning of moksha as liberation from rebirth, see Patrick Olivelle in the Encyclopædia Britannica.[web 4]

  9. ^ As opposite to sukha, «pleasure,» it is better translated as «pain.»[84]
  10. ^ Earlier Buddhist texts refer to five realms rather than six realms; when described as five realms, the god realm and demi-god realm constitute a single realm.[100]
  11. ^ This merit gaining may be on the behalf of one’s family members.[107][108][109]
  12. ^ Diseases and suffering induced by the disruptive actions of other people are examples of non-karma suffering.[112]
  13. ^ The emphasis on intent in Buddhism marks its difference from the karma theory of Jainism where karma accumulates with or without intent.[114][115] The emphasis on intent is also found in Hinduism, and Buddhism may have influenced karma theories of Hinduism.[116]
  14. ^ This Buddhist idea may have roots in the quid-pro-quo exchange beliefs of the Hindu Vedic rituals.[123] The «karma merit transfer» concept has been controversial, not accepted in later Jainism and Hinduism traditions, unlike Buddhism where it was adopted in ancient times and remains a common practice.[120] According to Bruce Reichenbach, the «merit transfer» idea was generally absent in early Buddhism and may have emerged with the rise of Mahayana Buddhism; he adds that while major Hindu schools such as Yoga, Advaita Vedanta and others do not believe in merit transfer, some bhakti Hindu traditions later adopted the idea just like Buddhism.[124]
  15. ^ Another variant, which may be condensed to the eightfold or tenfold path, starts with a Tathagatha entering this world. A layman hears his teachings, decides to leave the life of a householder, starts living according to the moral precepts, guards his sense-doors, practises mindfulness and the four jhanas, gains the three knowledges, understands the Four Noble Truths and destroys the taints, and perceives that he is liberated.[127]
  16. ^ The early Mahayana Buddhism texts link their discussion of «emptiness» (shunyata) to Anatta and Nirvana. They do so, states Mun-Keat Choong, in three ways: first, in the common sense of a monk’s meditative state of emptiness; second, with the main sense of anatta or ‘everything in the world is empty of self’; third, with the ultimate sense of nirvana or realisation of emptiness and thus an end to rebirth cycles of suffering.[138]
  17. ^ Some scholars such as Cousins and Sangharakshita translate apranaihita as «aimlessness or directionless-ness».[140]
  18. ^ These descriptions of nirvana in Buddhist texts, states Peter Harvey, are contested by scholars because nirvana in Buddhism is ultimately described as a state of «stopped consciousness (blown out), but one that is not non-existent», and «it seems impossible to imagine what awareness devoid of any object would be like».[146][147]
  19. ^ Scholars note that better rebirth, not nirvana, has been the primary focus of a vast majority of lay Buddhists. This they attempt through merit accumulation and good kamma.[150][151]
  20. ^ Wayman and Wayman have disagreed with this view, and they state that the Tathagatagarbha is neither self nor sentient being, nor soul, nor personality.[187]
  21. ^ Williams refers to Frauwallner (1973, p. 155)
  22. ^ Many ancient Upanishads of Hinduism describe yoga and meditation as a means to liberation.[267][268][269]
  23. ^ While some interpretations state that Buddhism may have originated as a social reform, other scholars state that it is incorrect and anachronistic to regard the Buddha as a social reformer.[352] Buddha’s concern was «to reform individuals, help them to leave society forever, not to reform the world… he never preached against social inequality». Richard Gombrich, quoted by Christopher Queen.[352][353]
  24. ^ The Digha Nikaya, Majjhima Nikaya, Samyutta Nikaya and Anguttara Nikaya
  25. ^ The surviving portions of the scriptures of Sarvastivada, Mulasarvastivada, Mahīśāsaka, Dharmaguptaka and other schools.[374][375]
  26. ^ Exemplary studies are the study on descriptions of «liberating insight» by Lambert Schmithausen,[377] the overview of early Buddhism by Tilmann Vetter,[132] the philological work on the four truths by K.R. Norman,[378] the textual studies by Richard Gombrich,[379] and the research on early meditation methods by Johannes Bronkhorst.[289]
  27. ^ Well-known proponents of the first position are A. K. Warder[subnote 1] and Richard Gombrich.[382][subnote 2]
  28. ^ A proponent of the second position is Ronald Davidson.[subnote 3]
  29. ^ Well-known proponents of the third position are J.W. de Jong,[384][subnote 4] Johannes Bronkhorst[subnote 5] and Donald Lopez.[subnote 6]
  30. ^ «The most important evidence – in fact the only evidence – for situating the emergence of the Mahayana around the beginning of the common era was not Indian evidence at all, but came from China. Already by the last quarter of the 2nd century CE, there was a small, seemingly idiosyncratic collection of substantial Mahayana sutras translated into what Erik Zürcher calls ‘broken Chinese’ by an Indoscythian, whose Indian name has been reconstructed as Lokaksema.»[421]
  31. ^ «The south (of India) was then vigorously creative in producing Mahayana Sutras» Warder[423]
  32. ^ See Hill (2009), p. 30, for the Chinese text from the Hou Hanshu, and p. 31 for a translation of it.[442]
  33. ^ Harvey (1998), Gombrich (1984), Gethin (1998, pp. 1–2); identifies «three broad traditions» as: (1) «The Theravāda tradition of Sri Lanka and South-East Asia, also sometimes referred to as ‘southern’ Buddhism»; (2) «The East Asian tradition of China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam, also sometimes referred to as ‘eastern’ Buddhism»; and, (3) «The Tibetan tradition, also sometimes referred to as ‘northern’ Buddhism.»;
    Robinson & Johnson (1982) divide their book into two parts: Part One is entitled «The Buddhism of South Asia» (which pertains to Early Buddhism in India); and, Part Two is entitled «The Development of Buddhism Outside of India» with chapters on «The Buddhism of Southeast Asia», «Buddhism in the Tibetan Culture Area», «East Asian Buddhism» and «Buddhism Comes West»;
    Penguin Handbook of Living Religions, 1984, p. 279;
    Prebish & Keown, Introducing Buddhism, ebook, Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 2005, printed ed, Harper, 2006.
  34. ^ See e.g. the multi-dimensional classification in Eliade et al. (1987), pp. 440ff Encyclopedia of Religion
  35. ^ This is a contested number. Official numbers from the Chinese government are lower, while other surveys are higher. According to Katharina Wenzel-Teuber, in non-government surveys, «49 percent of self-claimed non-believers [in China] held some religious beliefs, such as believing in soul reincarnation, heaven, hell, or supernatural forces. Thus the ‘pure atheists’ make up only about 15 percent of the sample [surveyed].»[528]

Subnotes

  1. ^ According to A.K. Warder, in his 1970 publication «Indian Buddhism», from the oldest extant texts a common kernel can be drawn out.[375] According to Warder, c.q. his publisher: «This kernel of doctrine is presumably common Buddhism of the period before the great schisms of the fourth and third centuries BC. It may be substantially the Buddhism of the Buddha himself, although this cannot be proved: at any rate it is a Buddhism presupposed by the schools as existing about a hundred years after the parinirvana of the Buddha, and there is no evidence to suggest that it was formulated by anyone else than the Buddha and his immediate followers.»[381]
  2. ^ Richard Gombrich: «I have the greatest difficulty in accepting that the main edifice is not the work of a single genius. By «the main edifice» I mean the collections of the main body of sermons, the four Nikāyas, and of the main body of monastic rules.»[379]
  3. ^ Ronald Davidson: «While most scholars agree that there was a rough body of sacred literature (disputed)(sic) that a relatively early community (disputed)(sic) maintained and transmitted, we have little confidence that much, if any, of surviving Buddhist scripture is actually the word of the historic Buddha.»[383]
  4. ^ J.W. De Jong: «It would be hypocritical to assert that nothing can be said about the doctrine of earliest Buddhism […] the basic ideas of Buddhism found in the canonical writings could very well have been proclaimed by him [the Buddha], transmitted and developed by his disciples and, finally, codified in fixed formulas.»[384]
  5. ^ Bronkhorst: «This position is to be preferred to (ii) for purely methodological reasons: only those who seek nay find, even if no success is guaranteed.»[380]
  6. ^ Lopez: «The original teachings of the historical Buddha are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to recover or reconstruct.»[385]

References

Citations

  1. ^ Wells (2008).
  2. ^ Roach (2011).
  3. ^ «buddhism noun — Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes | Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary at OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com».
  4. ^ Siderits, Mark (2019). «Buddha». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 21 May 2022. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
  5. ^ «Buddhism». (2009). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 26 November 2009, from Encyclopædia Britannica Online Library Edition.
  6. ^ Lopez (2001), p. 239.
  7. ^ a b c d Pew Research Center (2012a).
  8. ^ «Christianity 2015: Religious Diversity and Personal» (PDF), International Bulletin of Missionary Research, 39 (1): 28–29, January 2015, doi:10.1177/239693931503900108, S2CID 148475861, archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2017, retrieved 29 May 2015 – via Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary
  9. ^ Malikov, Aladdin (2022). «History, Beliefs and Sects of Buddhism». Elm və Həyat journal (in Azerbaijani). doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.12273.35689.
  10. ^ Donner, Susan E. (April 2010). «Self or No Self: Views from Self Psychology and Buddhism in a Postmodern Context». Smith College Studies in Social Work. 80 (2): 215–227. doi:10.1080/00377317.2010.486361. S2CID 143672653. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
  11. ^ Avison, Austin (4 October 2021). «Delusional Mitigation in Religious and Psychological Forms of Self-Cultivation: Buddhist and Clinical Insight on Delusional Symptomatology». The Hilltop Review. 12 (6): 1–29. Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2021 – via Digital Commons.
  12. ^ Williams (1989), pp. 275ff.
  13. ^ Robinson & Johnson (1997), p. xx.
  14. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 27–28, 73–74.
  15. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 99.
  16. ^ Powers (2007), pp. 392–393, 415.
  17. ^ [British Library The development of the Buddhist ‘canon] at bl.uk. Retriebved 10 February 2023.
  18. ^ White, David Gordon, ed. (2000). Tantra in Practice. Princeton University Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-691-05779-8. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 8 July 2015.
  19. ^ Powers (2007), pp. 26–27.
  20. ^ «Candles in the Dark: A New Spirit for a Plural World» by Barbara Sundberg Baudot, p. 305
  21. ^ Claus, Peter; Diamond, Sarah; Mills, Margaret (28 October 2020). South Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-000-10122-5. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  22. ^ Akira Hirakawa; Paul Groner (1993). A History of Indian Buddhism: From Śākyamuni to Early Mahāyāna. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 227–240. ISBN 978-81-208-0955-0.
  23. ^ Damien Keown (2004). A Dictionary of Buddhism. Oxford University Press. pp. 208–209. ISBN 978-0-19-157917-2.
  24. ^ Jonathan H. X. Lee; Kathleen M. Nadeau (2011). Encyclopedia of Asian American Folklore and Folklife. ABC-CLIO. p. 504. ISBN 978-0-313-35066-5., Quote: «The three other major Indian religions – Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism – originated in India as an alternative to Brahmanic/Hindu philosophy»;
    Jan Gonda (1987), Indian Religions: An Overview – Buddhism and Jainism, Encyclopedia of Religion, 2nd Edition, Volume 7, Editor: Lindsay Jones, Macmillan Reference, ISBN 0-02-865740-3, p. 4428;
    K. T. S. Sarao; Jefferey Long (2017). Encyclopedia of Indian Religions: Buddhism and Jainism. Springer Netherlands. ISBN 978-94-024-0851-5., Quote: «Buddhism and Jainism, two religions which, together with Hinduism, constitute the three pillars of Indic religious tradition in its classical formulation.»
  25. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 7–8.
  26. ^ Bronkhorst (2013), pp. ix–xi.
  27. ^ Beyond Enlightenment: Buddhism, Religion, Modernity by Richard Cohen. Routledge 1999. ISBN 0-415-54444-0. p. 33. «Donors adopted Sakyamuni Buddha’s family name to assert their legitimacy as his heirs, both institutionally and ideologically. To take the name of Sakya was to define oneself by one’s affiliation with the buddha, somewhat like calling oneself a Buddhist today.
  28. ^ Sakya or Buddhist Origins by Caroline Rhys Davids (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1931) p. 1. «Put away the word «Buddhism» and think of your subject as «Sakya.» This will at once place you for your perspective at a true point. You are now concerned to learn less about ‘Buddha’ and ‘Buddhism,’ and more about him whom India has ever known as Sakya-muni, and about his men who, as their records admit, were spoken of as the Sakya-sons, or men of the Sakyas.»
  29. ^ Lopez, Donald S. (1995). Curators of the Buddha, University of Chicago Press. p. 7
  30. ^ Beyond Enlightenment: Buddhism, Religion, Modernity by Richard Cohen. Routledge 1999. ISBN 0-415-54444-0. p. 33. Bauddha is «a secondary derivative of buddha, in which the vowel’s lengthening indicates connection or relation. Things that are bauddha pertain to the buddha, just as things Saiva related to Siva and things Vaisnava belong to Visnu. … baudda can be both adjectival and nominal; it can be used for doctrines spoken by the buddha, objects enjoyed by him, texts attributed to him, as well as individuals, communities, and societies that offer him reverence or accept ideologies certified through his name. Strictly speaking, Sakya is preferable to bauddha since the latter is not attested at Ajanta. In fact, as a collective noun, bauddha is an outsider’s term. The bauddha did not call themselves this in India, though they did sometimes use the word adjectivally (e.g., as a possessive, the buddha’s).»
  31. ^ a b Gethin (1998), pp. 13–14.
  32. ^ Swearer (2004), p. 177.
  33. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 15–24.
  34. ^ a b Keown & Prebish (2010), pp. 105–106.
  35. ^ Buswell (2004), p. 352.
  36. ^ Lopez (1995), p. 16.
  37. ^ Carrithers (1986), p. 10.
  38. ^ Armstrong (2004), p. xii.
  39. ^ a b Gombrich (1988), p. 49.
  40. ^ Edward J. Thomas (2013). The Life of Buddha. Routledge. pp. 16–29. ISBN 978-1-136-20121-9.
  41. ^ Gombrich (1988), pp. 49–50.
  42. ^ Gombrich (1988), p. 50.
  43. ^ Gombrich (1988), pp. 50–51.
  44. ^ Gombrich (1988), pp. 18–19, 50–51.
  45. ^ Kurt Tropper (2013). Tibetan Inscriptions. Brill Academic. pp. 60–61 with footnotes 134–136. ISBN 978-90-04-25241-7.
  46. ^ Analayo (2011). A Comparative Study of the Majjhima-nikāya Volume 1 Archived 21 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine (Introduction, Studies of Discourses 1 to 90), p. 170.
  47. ^ Wynne, Alexander (2019). «Did the Buddha exist?». Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies. 16: 98–148. Archived from the original on 2 December 2022. Retrieved 2 December 2022.
  48. ^ a b c Wynne (2007), pp. 8–23.
  49. ^ Hajime Nakamura (2000). Gotama Buddha: A Biography Based on the Most Reliable Texts. Kosei. pp. 127–129. ISBN 978-4-333-01893-2. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  50. ^ Bronkhorst (2013), pp. 19–32.
  51. ^ Hirakawa (1993), pp. 22–26.
  52. ^ a b Analayo (2011). «A Comparative Study of the Majjhima-nikāya Volume 1 (Introduction, Studies of Discourses 1 to 90),» p. 236.
  53. ^ K.T.S, Sarao (2020). The History of Mahabodhi Temple at Bodh Gaya. Springer Nature. p. 62. ISBN 9789811580673. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
  54. ^ Bronkhorst (2011), pp. 233–237.
  55. ^ Schuhmacher & Woener (1991), p. 143.
  56. ^ Gombrich (1988), pp. 49–51.
  57. ^ Keown (2003), p. 267.
  58. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 54–55.
  59. ^ Barbara Crandall (2012). Gender and Religion (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 56–58. ISBN 978-1-4411-4871-1. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  60. ^ a b c Tipitaka Archived 27 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine Encyclopædia Britannica (2015)
  61. ^ Sarah LeVine; David N Gellner (2009). Rebuilding Buddhism. Harvard University Press. pp. 1–19. ISBN 978-0-674-04012-0.
  62. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 1–5.
  63. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 1–2, 49–58, 253–271.
  64. ^ Williams (1989), pp. 1–25.
  65. ^ Donald S. Lopez Jr. (21 December 2017). Hyecho’s Journey: The World of Buddhism. University of Chicago Press. p. XIV. ISBN 978-0-226-51806-0. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
  66. ^ a b c Nyanatiloka (1980), p. 65.
  67. ^ a b Emmanuel (2013), p. 30.
  68. ^ a b c d Williams (2002), pp. 74–75.
  69. ^ Buswell & Lopez (2003), p. 708.
  70. ^ Schmidt-Leukel (2006), pp. 32–34.
  71. ^ Makransky (1997), p. 27.
  72. ^ Davids, Thomas William Rhys; Stede, William (21 July 1993). Pali-English Dictionary. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. ISBN 9788120811447 – via Google Books.
  73. ^ Warder (2000), pp. 45–46.
  74. ^ a b Harvey (2016).
  75. ^ a b Samuel (2008), p. 136.
  76. ^ Spiro (1982), p. 42.
  77. ^ Vetter (1988), pp. xxi, xxxi–xxxii.
  78. ^ Makransky (1997), pp. 27–28.
  79. ^ a b Lopez (2009), p. 147.
  80. ^ Kingsland (2016), p. 286.
  81. ^ Carter (1987), p. 3179.
  82. ^ Anderson (2013).
  83. ^ Anderson (2013), p. 162 with note 38, for context see pp. 1–3.
  84. ^ Emmanuel (2013), pp. 26–31.
  85. ^ Gombrich (2005a), p. 47, Quote: «All phenomenal existence [in Buddhism] is said to have three interlocking characteristics: impermanence, suffering and lack of soul or essence.».
  86. ^ Anatta Buddhism Archived 22 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica (2013)
  87. ^ [a] Christmas Humphreys (2012). Exploring Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 42–43. ISBN 978-1-136-22877-3. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
    [b] Gombrich (2005a, p. 47), Quote: «(…) Buddha’s teaching that beings have no soul, no abiding essence. This ‘no-soul doctrine’ (anatta-vada) he expounded in his second sermon.»
  88. ^ [a] Anatta Archived 22 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica (2013), Quote: «Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman («the self»).»;
    [b] Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-2217-5, p. 64; «Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence.»;
    [c] John C. Plott et al. (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0158-5, p. 63, Quote: «The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism»;
    [d] Katie Javanaud (2013), Is The Buddhist ‘No-Self’ Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana? Archived 13 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Philosophy Now;
    [e] David Loy (1982), «Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?», International Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp. 65–74
  89. ^ Brian Morris (2006). Religion and Anthropology: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-521-85241-8. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016., Quote: «(…) anatta is the doctrine of non-self, and is an extreme empiricist doctrine that holds that the notion of an unchanging permanent self is a fiction and has no reality. According to Buddhist doctrine, the individual person consists of five skandhas or heaps – the body, feelings, perceptions, impulses and consciousness. The belief in a self or soul, over these five skandhas, is illusory and the cause of suffering.»
  90. ^ Richard Francis Gombrich; Cristina Anna Scherrer-Schaub (2008). Buddhist Studies. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 209–210. ISBN 978-81-208-3248-0. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  91. ^ Frank Hoffman; Deegalle Mahinda (2013). Pali Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 162–165. ISBN 978-1-136-78553-5. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  92. ^ Klostermaier (2010), p. 604.
  93. ^ a b c Juergensmeyer & Roof (2011), pp. 271–272.
  94. ^ Trainor (2004), p. 58, Quote: «Buddhism shares with Hinduism the doctrine of Samsara, whereby all beings pass through an unceasing cycle of birth, death and rebirth until they find a means of liberation from the cycle. However, Buddhism differs from Hinduism in rejecting the assertion that every human being possesses a changeless soul which constitutes his or her ultimate identity, and which transmigrates from one incarnation to the next..
  95. ^ a b Wilson (2010).
  96. ^ McClelland (2010), pp. 172, 240.
  97. ^ Williams, Tribe & Wynne (2012), pp. 18–19, chapter 1.
  98. ^ Conze (2013), p. 71, Quote: «Nirvana is the raison d’être of Buddhism, and its ultimate justification.».
  99. ^ Gethin (1998), p. 119.
  100. ^ Buswell (2004), pp. 711–712.
  101. ^ Buswell & Gimello (1992), pp. 7–8, 83–84.
  102. ^ Choong (1999), pp. 28–29, Quote: «Seeing (passati) the nature of things as impermanent leads to the removal of the view of self, and so to the realisation of nirvana.».
  103. ^ Rahula (2014), pp. 51–58.
  104. ^ Keown (1996), p. 107.
  105. ^ Oliver Leaman (2002). Eastern Philosophy: Key Readings. Routledge. pp. 23–27. ISBN 978-1-134-68919-4. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  106. ^ [a] Christmas Humphreys (2012). Exploring Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 42–43. ISBN 978-1-136-22877-3. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
    [b] Brian Morris (2006). Religion and Anthropology: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-521-85241-8. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016., Quote: «(…) anatta is the doctrine of non-self, and is an extreme empiricist doctrine that holds that the notion of an unchanging permanent self is a fiction and has no reality. According to Buddhist doctrine, the individual person consists of five skandhas or heaps – the body, feelings, perceptions, impulses and consciousness. The belief in a self or soul, over these five skandhas, is illusory and the cause of suffering.»
    [c] Gombrich (2005a, p. 47), Quote: «(…) Buddha’s teaching that beings have no soul, no abiding essence. This ‘no-soul doctrine’ (anatta-vada) he expounded in his second sermon.»
  107. ^ a b c d Buswell & Lopez (2003), pp. 708–709.
  108. ^ a b Ronald Wesley Neufeldt (1986). Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments. State University of New York Press. pp. 123–131. ISBN 978-0-87395-990-2. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  109. ^ William H. Swatos; Peter Kivisto (1998). Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. Rowman Altamira. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-7619-8956-1. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  110. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 131, 32–34.
  111. ^ Kasulis (2006), pp. 1–12.
  112. ^ a b c d e Harvey (2013), pp. 40–41.
  113. ^ Krishan (1997), pp. 59–78.
  114. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 40.
  115. ^ Krishan (1997), pp. 47, 55.
  116. ^ Norman C. McClelland (2010). Encyclopedia of Reincarnation and Karma. McFarland. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-7864-5675-8.
  117. ^ Spiro (1982), p. 430 with footnote 1.
  118. ^ Karl Potter (1986). Ronald Wesley Neufeldt (ed.). Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments. State University of New York Press. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-87395-990-2. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  119. ^ Lopez (2001), pp. 239–248.
  120. ^ a b Naomi Appleton (2014). Narrating Karma and Rebirth: Buddhist and Jain Multi-Life Stories. Cambridge University Press. pp. 129–131. ISBN 978-1-139-91640-0. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  121. ^ a b Spiro (1982), pp. 124–128.
  122. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 45–46.
  123. ^ James Egge (2013). Religious Giving and the Invention of Karma in Theravada Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 31–34. ISBN 978-1-136-85922-9.
  124. ^ Bruce Reichenbach (1990). The Law of Karma: A Philosophical Study. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 152–155. ISBN 978-1-349-11899-1.
  125. ^ a b Buswell & Lopez (2003), pp. 589–590.
  126. ^ Collins (1998), pp. 135–177, 188, 443.
  127. ^ Bucknell (1984).
  128. ^ Choong (2000), p. 141.
  129. ^ Fuller (2005), pp. 55–56.
  130. ^ Steven Collins (2010). Nirvana: Concept, Imagery, Narrative. Cambridge University Press. pp. 33–34, 47–50, 63–64, 74–75, 106. ISBN 978-0-521-88198-2.
  131. ^ Cousins (1996), p. 9.
  132. ^ a b c d Vetter (1988).
  133. ^ Gombrich (1997), p. 66.
  134. ^ Steven Collins (2010). Nirvana: Concept, Imagery, Narrative. Cambridge University Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-521-88198-2., Quote: «This general scheme remained basic to later Hinduism, to Jainism, and to Buddhism. Eternal salvation, to use the Christian term, is not conceived of as world without end; we have already got that, called samsara, the world of rebirth and redeath: that is the problem, not the solution. The ultimate aim is the timeless state of moksha, or as the Buddhists seem to have been the first to call it, nirvana.»
  135. ^ Steven Collins (1990). Selfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theravada Buddhism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 82–84. ISBN 978-0-521-39726-1. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  136. ^ Ray Billington (2002). Understanding Eastern Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 58–60. ISBN 978-1-134-79348-8. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  137. ^ David Loy (2009). Awareness Bound and Unbound: Buddhist Essays. State University of New York Press. pp. 35–39. ISBN 978-1-4384-2680-8. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  138. ^ Mun-Keat Choong (1999). The Notion of Emptiness in Early Buddhism. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 1–4, 85–88. ISBN 978-81-208-1649-7. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  139. ^ Dan Lusthaus (2014). Buddhist Phenomenology. Routledge. p. 124 with footnotes 2–3 on pp. 266–267. ISBN 978-1-317-97343-0.
  140. ^ Williams (2005b), p. 56, note 23.
  141. ^ Collins (1998), pp. 191–233.
  142. ^ Peter Harvey (2013). The Selfless Mind: Personality, Consciousness and Nirvana in Early Buddhism. Routledge. pp. 198–226. ISBN 978-1-136-78336-4. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  143. ^ Mun-Keat Choong (1999). The Notion of Emptiness in Early Buddhism. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 21–22. ISBN 978-81-208-1649-7. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  144. ^ Gananath Obeyesekere (2012). The Awakened Ones: Phenomenology of Visionary Experience. Columbia University Press. pp. 145–146. ISBN 978-0-231-15362-1.
  145. ^ Edward Conze (2012). Buddhism: Its Essence and Development. Courier. pp. 125–137. ISBN 978-0-486-17023-7.
  146. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 75–76.
  147. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 74–84.
  148. ^ Coogan (2003), p. 192.
  149. ^ Trainor (2004), p. 62.
  150. ^ Gowans (2004), p. 169.
  151. ^ Fowler (1999), p. 65 Quote: «For a vast majority of Buddhists in Theravadin countries, however, the order of monks is seen by lay Buddhists as a means of gaining the most merit in the hope of accumulating good karma for a better rebirth.»
  152. ^ Harvey (1998), p. 54.
  153. ^ John Bowker, The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions (1997), Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-213965-7
  154. ^ Williams (2002), p. 64, Quote: In the Mahatanhasankhaya Sutta the Buddha [stresses] that things originate in dependence upon causal conditioning, and this emphasis on causality describes the central feature of Buddhist ontology. All elements of samsara exist in some sense or another relative to their causes and conditions..
  155. ^ Robert Neville (2004). Jeremiah Hackett (ed.). Philosophy of Religion for a New Century: Essays in Honor of Eugene Thomas Long. Jerald Wallulis. Springer. p. 257. ISBN 978-1-4020-2073-5., Quote: «[Buddhism’s ontological hypotheses] that nothing in reality has its own-being and that all phenomena reduce to the relativities of pratitya samutpada. The Buddhist ontological hypothesese deny that there is any ontologically ultimate object such a God, Brahman, the Dao, or any transcendent creative source or principle.»
  156. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 153–155.
  157. ^ Guy Debrock (2012). Paul B. Scheurer (ed.). Newton’s Scientific and Philosophical Legacy. G. Debrock. Springer. p. 376, note 12. ISBN 978-94-009-2809-1.
  158. ^ David J. Kalupahana (1975). Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 54–60. ISBN 978-0-8248-0298-1.
  159. ^ Genjun Sasaki (1986). Linguistic Approach to Buddhist Thought. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 67–69. ISBN 978-81-208-0038-0.
  160. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 151–152.
  161. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 65–72.
  162. ^ Emmanuel (2013), pp. 51–66.
  163. ^ Harvey (1998), p. 54, Quote: «The main concrete application of the abstract principle is in the form of a series of conditioned links (nidanas), culminating in the arising of dukkha.» (…) «This [doctrine] states the principle of conditionality, that all things, mental and physical, arise and exist due to the presence of certain conditions, and cease once their conditions are removed: nothing (except Nibbana) is independent. The doctrine thus complements the teaching that no permanent, independent self can be found.».
  164. ^ Gombrich (2006), p. 47.
  165. ^ Siderits, Mark (2007). «Buddhism as philosophy,» p. 39
  166. ^ Shi Huifeng, Is «Illusion» a Prajñāpāramitā Creation? The Birth and Death of a Buddhist Cognitive Metaphor, Fo Guang University, Journal of Buddhist Philosophy, Vol.2, 2016.
  167. ^ Ronkin, Noa (2005). «Early Buddhist Metaphysics: The Making of a Philosophical Tradition» p. 91. RoutledgeCurzon.
  168. ^ Lindtner (1997), p. 324.
  169. ^ a b Harvey (2013), pp. 244–245.
  170. ^ Crosby, Kate (2013). «Theravada Buddhism: Continuity, Diversity, and Identity,» p. 16. John Wiley & Sons.
  171. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 27–28.
  172. ^ Williams (2008), p. 21.
  173. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 162.
  174. ^ a b Williams (2008), p. 27.
  175. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 164.
  176. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 31.
  177. ^ «Dharma Archived 26 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine», The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions.
  178. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 88.
  179. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 85–88.
  180. ^ Gethin (1998), p. 92.
  181. ^ Gethin (1998), p. 86.
  182. ^ «What is the Triple Gem?». www.accesstoinsight.org. Archived from the original on 30 July 2016. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  183. ^ Williams, Paul (2002), «Buddhist Thought», p. 52, Taylor & Francis Kindle Edition
  184. ^ Siderits, Mark, Buddhism as philosophy, 2017, p. 149.
  185. ^ Gold, Jonathan C. (22 April 2011). «Vasubandhu». In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive (Summer 2018 Edition). Archived from the original on 5 July 2019. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  186. ^ Williams (2008), p. 104.
  187. ^ Williams (2008), p. 107.
  188. ^ Brunnholzl, Karl, When the Clouds Part, The Uttaratantra and Its Meditative Tradition as a Bridge between Sutra and Tantra, Snow Lion, Boston & London, 2014, page 3.
  189. ^ Williams (2008), pp. 104–105, 108–109, Quote: «… [The Mahaparinirvana Sutra] refers to the Buddha using the term «Self» in order to win over non-Buddhist ascetics.».
  190. ^ Fowler (1999), pp. 101–102 Quote: «Some texts of the tathagatagarbha literature, such as the Mahaparinirvana Sutra actually refer to an atman, though other texts are careful to avoid the term. This would be in direct opposition to the general teachings of Buddhism on anatta. Indeed, the distinctions between the general Indian concept of atman and the popular Buddhist concept of Buddha-nature are often blurred to the point that writers consider them to be synonymous.»
  191. ^ Suzuki, D.T. (1956), The Lankavatara Sutra: A Mahayana Text. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. p.69
  192. ^ Williams (2008), p. 112.
  193. ^ Hookham (1991), p. 96.
  194. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 23, 81.
  195. ^ Keown (1996), pp. 24, 59.
  196. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 72.
  197. ^ Buswell & Lopez (2003), p. 49, antagrahadrsti.
  198. ^ Carole Anderson (2013), Pain and its Ending, p.143
  199. ^ a b c Bucknell, Rod, «The Buddhist Path to Liberation: An Analysis of the Listing of Stages», The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies Volume 7, Number 2, 1984
  200. ^ Gethin (2001), pp. xiii–xiv.
  201. ^ Ajahn Sucitto (2010), pp. 87–88.
  202. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 81–83.
  203. ^ Anderson (2013), pp. 64–65.
  204. ^ Harvey (2016), pp. 253–255.
  205. ^ Bodhi (2010), pp. 1–13.
  206. ^ Williams, Tribe & Wynne (2012), p. 52.
  207. ^ a b c d e f Vetter (1988), pp. 12–13.
  208. ^ a b c Harvey (2013), pp. 83–85.
  209. ^ Bodhi (2010), pp. 47–48.
  210. ^ a b c d Harvey (2013), pp. 83–84.
  211. ^ a b Gowans (2013), p. 440.
  212. ^ Andrew Powell (1989). Living Buddhism. University of California Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-520-20410-2.
  213. ^ David L. Weddle (2010). Miracles: Wonder and Meaning in World Religions. New York University Press. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-8147-9483-8.
  214. ^ Vetter (1988), p. 12.
  215. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 83, 273–274.
  216. ^ Martine Batchelor (2014). The Spirit of the Buddha. Yale University Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-300-17500-4. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.; Quote: «These five trades, O monks, should not be taken up by a lay follower: trading with weapons, trading in living beings, trading in meat, trading in intoxicants, trading in poison.»
  217. ^ a b Harvey (2013), p. 83.
  218. ^ Roderick Bucknell; Chris Kang (2013). The Meditative Way: Readings in the Theory and Practice of Buddhist Meditation. Routledge. pp. 12–13. ISBN 978-1-136-80408-3.
  219. ^ Yin-shun (2012). «The Way to Buddhahood: Instructions from a Modern Chinese Master,» p. 29. Simon and Schuster.
  220. ^ See for example, Tsong-Kha-Pa (2015) «The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment», chapter three. Shambala Pubs.
  221. ^ a b Harvey (2013), p. 249.
  222. ^ Shults (2014), p. 108.
  223. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 244.
  224. ^ a b Williams (2005c), p. 398.
  225. ^ McFarlane (2001), pp. 187–193.
  226. ^ Goodman, Charles (2017). «Ethics in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 8 July 2010.
  227. ^ Bodhi Bhikkhu (1997). Great Disciples of the Buddha: Their Lives, Their Works, Their Legacy. Wisdom Publications. p. 387, fn. 12. ISBN 978-0-86171-128-4.
  228. ^ Harvey (2000), p. 67.
  229. ^ Harvey (2000), p. 69.
  230. ^ Harvey (2000), p. 70.
  231. ^ Harvey (2000), pp. 71–74.
  232. ^ Harvey (2000), p. 75.
  233. ^ Harvey (2000), p. 76.
  234. ^ Harvey (2000), p. 77.
  235. ^ Keown (2013), p. 616.
  236. ^ Harvey (2000), pp. 33, 71.
  237. ^ Ratanakul (2007), p. 241.
  238. ^ Horigan (1996), p. 276.
  239. ^ Terwiel (2012), pp. 178–179.
  240. ^ a b Harvey (2000), p. 80.
  241. ^ Ledgerwood (2008), p. 152.
  242. ^ Funayama (2004), p. 105.
  243. ^ a b Gombrich (1988), p. 109.
  244. ^ Gombrich (1988), p. 93.
  245. ^ a b c Gombrich (1988), pp. 89–92.
  246. ^ Gombrich (1988), pp. 101–107.
  247. ^ a b Anālayo (2003). «Satipaṭṭhāna: The Direct Path to Realization,» p. 71. Windhorse Publications.
  248. ^ a b Anālayo (2003). «Satipaṭṭhāna: The Direct Path to Realization,» p. 225. Windhorse Publications.
  249. ^ Webster, David (2004). «The Philosophy of Desire in the Buddhist Pali Canon,» p. 124. Routledge.
  250. ^ Rhys Davids & Stede (1921–1925), p. 377, «Nekkhamma».
  251. ^ Harvey (1998), p. 199.
  252. ^ Harvey (2000), p. 89.
  253. ^ Emmanuel (2013), p. 492.
  254. ^ Robert E. Buswell Jr., Donald S. Lopez Jr. (2013) «The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism,» p. 18. Princeton University Press.
  255. ^ Johnston, William M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Monasticism, Routledge, 2013, p. 467-468.
  256. ^ Analayo (2018) «Satipatthana Meditation, A Practice Guide,» chapter 1. Windhorse Publications.
  257. ^ a b Boin-Webb, Sara. (English trans. from Walpola Rāhula’s French trans. of the Sanskrit; 2001) «Abhidharmasamuccaya: The Compendium of the Higher Teaching (Philosophy) by Asaṅga», p. 9, Asian Humanities Press.
  258. ^ Sharf, Robert (2014), «Mindfulness and Mindlessness in Early Chan» (PDF), Philosophy East and West, 64 (4): 933–964, doi:10.1353/pew.2014.0074
  259. ^ Kuan (2007), p. 50.
  260. ^ Vetter, Tilmann (1988), «The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism,» p. 5. BRILL.
  261. ^ Williams (2000), pp. 45–46.
  262. ^ Werner, Karel (1977). «Yoga and the Ṛg Veda: An Interpretation of the Keśin Hymn (RV 10, 136)». Religious Studies. 13 (3): 289–302. doi:10.1017/S0034412500010076. S2CID 170592174.
  263. ^ a b Carrithers (1986), p. 30.
  264. ^ Gombrich (1988), p. 44.
  265. ^ Miller (1996), p. 8.
  266. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), pp. 1–17.
  267. ^ Collins (2000), p. 199.
  268. ^ Mark Singleton (2010), Yoga Body: The Origins of Modern Posture Practice, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-539534-1, pp. 25–34
  269. ^ White, David Gordon (2011). Yoga, Brief History of an Idea. Princeton University Press. pp. 3–5.
  270. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), p. 99.
  271. ^ Wynne (2007), p. [page needed].
  272. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), p. Part I: page 5.
  273. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), p. 88.
  274. ^ Gombrich (2007).
  275. ^ Norman (1997), p. 29.
  276. ^ Gombrich (1997), p. 131.
  277. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), p. Chapter 9, page 86.
  278. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), pp. 74 (Chapter 8), 102 (Conclusion).
  279. ^ Alex Wayman (1984). Buddhist Insight: Essays. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 86–89. ISBN 978-81-208-0675-7.
  280. ^ Bruno Petzold (1995). The Classification of Buddhism. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 502–503. ISBN 978-3-447-03373-2.
  281. ^ Lewis Hodous; William E. Soothill (2003). A Dictionary of Chinese Buddhist Terms: With Sanskrit and English Equivalents and a Sanskrit-Pali Index. Routledge. p. 179. ISBN 978-1-135-79123-0.
  282. ^ Bodhi (2005), pp. 269–270, 440 n. 13.
  283. ^ Bodhi (2000), pp. 1251–1253.
  284. ^ Welch (1967), p. 396.
  285. ^ «What is Theravada Buddhism?». Access to Insight. Access to Insight. Archived from the original on 21 August 2013. Retrieved 17 August 2013.
  286. ^ Keown (1996), pp. 106–107, context: Chapter 7.
  287. ^ Bodhi (2005), pp. 268, 439.
  288. ^ De La Vallee Poussin (trans.); Pruden, Leo M. (trans.) Abhidharmakosabhasyam of Vasubandhu. Vol. III, page 925.
  289. ^ a b Bronkhorst (1993).
  290. ^ a b Anālayo. «A Brief Criticism of the ‘Two Paths to Liberation’ Theory» Archived 21 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine JOCBS. 2016 (11): 38-51.
  291. ^ Gethin (2001), p. xiv.
  292. ^ Hirakawa (1993), pp. 172–174.
  293. ^ a b c d Harvey (2013), pp. 154, 326.
  294. ^ Carl Olson (2009). The A to Z of Buddhism. Scarecrow. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-8108-7073-4.
  295. ^ Diane Morgan (2010). Essential Buddhism: A Comprehensive Guide to Belief and Practice. ABC-CLIO. p. 125. ISBN 978-0-313-38452-3.
  296. ^ a b c d Fowler (1999), pp. 60–62.
  297. ^ Trainor (2004), p. 87.
  298. ^ Luis Gomez (2015). Donald S. Lopez Jr. (ed.). Buddhism in Practice. Princeton University Press. pp. 236–243. ISBN 978-1-4008-8007-2.
  299. ^ Trainor (2004), pp. 86–87.
  300. ^ Powers (2007), p. 250.
  301. ^ Garson, Nathaniel DeWitt (2004). Penetrating the Secret Essence Tantra: Context and Philosophy in the Mahayoga System of rNying-ma Tantra, p. 52
  302. ^ Trainor (2004), pp. 88–89.
  303. ^ a b Kuan (2007), p. 58.
  304. ^ Trainor (2004), p. 74.
  305. ^ Conze (2013), pp. 39–40.
  306. ^ Fowler (1999), pp. 49–52.
  307. ^ Joseph Mitsuo Kitagawa; Frank E. Reynolds; Theodore M. Ludwig (1980). Transitions and Transformations in the History of Religions: Essays in Honor of Joseph M. Kitagawa. Brill Academic. pp. 56–58. ISBN 978-90-04-06112-5. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016., Quote: «Suffering describes the condition of samsaric (this worldly) existence that arises from actions generated by ignorance of anatta and anicca. The doctrines of no-self and impermanence are thus the keystones of dhammic order.»
  308. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 73–75, 146–159, 243.
  309. ^ Buswell (2004), pp. 664–665.
  310. ^ Kuan (2007), p. 59.
  311. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 237.
  312. ^ Harvey (1998), p. 170.
  313. ^ Trainor (2004), pp. 84–85, 105, 108–109, 112–113, 116, 165, 185.
  314. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 239–240.
  315. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 243.
  316. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 243–244.
  317. ^ Harvey (2000), pp. 157–158.
  318. ^ Harvey (2000), pp. 156–159.
  319. ^ Phelps, Norm (2004). The Great Compassion: Buddhism & Animal Rights. New York: Lantern Books. p. 76. ISBN 1-59056-069-8.
  320. ^ Vanijja Sutta: Business (Wrong Livelihood) Archived 19 November 2005 at the Wayback Machine
  321. ^ Phelps, Norm (2004). The Great Compassion: Buddhism & Animal Rights. New York: Lantern Books. pp. 64-65. ISBN 1-59056-069-8.
  322. ^ Harvey (2000), p. 163.
  323. ^ a b c d e Donald Lopez (2004). Buddhist Scriptures. Penguin Books. pp. xi–xv. ISBN 978-0-14-190937-0.
  324. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 39–41.
  325. ^ Donald Lopez (2004). Buddhist Scriptures. Penguin Books. pp. xii–xiii. ISBN 978-0-14-190937-0.
  326. ^ Gethin (2008), p. xiv.
  327. ^ Eliot (1935), p. 16.
  328. ^ Donald Lopez (2004). Buddhist Scriptures. Penguin Books. pp. xiii–xvii. ISBN 978-0-14-190937-0.
  329. ^ a b Donald Lopez (2004). Buddhist Scriptures. Penguin Books. pp. xi–xxv. ISBN 978-0-14-190937-0.
  330. ^ Gethin (1998), pp. 42–43.
  331. ^ Sujato & Brahmali (2015), pp. 9–10.
  332. ^ Mun-Keat Choong (1999). The Notion of Emptiness in Early Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass, p. 3. ISBN 978-81-208-1649-7.
  333. ^ e.g. «Mun-keat, Choong (2000), The Fundamental Teachings of Early Buddhism» and «Analayo. Early Buddhist Meditation Studies (Volume 1)«
  334. ^ Anālayo (2008). «Reflections on Comparative Āgama Studies» (PDF). Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal. Taipei: Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies. 21: 3–21. ISSN 1017-7132. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 December 2019. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  335. ^ Warder (2000), pp. 282–283.
  336. ^ Crosby, Kate (2013). Theravada Buddhism: Continuity, Diversity, and Identity. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-4051-8906-4
  337. ^ Skilling (1992), p. 114.
  338. ^ Macmillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism (2004): p. 293
  339. ^ a b Hirakawa (1993), p. 252.
  340. ^ Buswell (2004), p. 494.
  341. ^ Nattier, Jan (2003), A Few Good Men: The Bodhisattva Path according to The Inquiry of Ugra (Ugraparipṛcchā), University of Hawaii Press, pp. 172–174, ISBN 978-0-8248-3003-8
  342. ^ Rinpoche, Kalu (1995), Profound Buddhism From Hinayana To Vajrayana, Clearpoint Press. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-9630371-5-2
  343. ^ Wayman, Alex (2008). The Buddhist Tantras: Light on Indo-Tibetan Esotericism. Routledge. p. 23.
  344. ^ Sørensen, Henrik H; Payne, Richard K; Orzech, Charles D. (ed.) (2010). Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras, in East Asia. Handbook of Oriental Studies. p. 20.
  345. ^ Grey, David B.; Tantra and the Tantric Traditions of Hinduism and Buddhism
  346. ^ Williams, Tribe & Wynne (2012), chapter 7.
  347. ^ Wallis, Christopher (2016). The Tantric Age: A Comparison Of Shaiva And Buddhist Tantra.[full citation needed]
  348. ^ Dalton, J. (2005). «A Crisis of Doxography: How Tibetans Organized Tantra During the 8th–12th Centuries». Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. 28 (1): 115–181.
  349. ^ Gethin (2008), p. xv.
  350. ^ Abraham Eraly (2011). The First Spring: The Golden Age of India. Penguin Books. pp. 538, 571. ISBN 978-0-670-08478-4.
  351. ^ Gombrich (1988), pp. 26–41.
  352. ^ a b Queen, Christopher. «Introduction: The Shapes and Sources of Engaged Buddhism». In Queen & King (1996), pp. 17–18.
  353. ^ Gombrich (1988), pp. 30–31.
  354. ^ Hajime Nakamura (1983). A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 102–104, 264–269, 294–295. ISBN 978-81-208-0651-1.; Quote: «But the Upanishadic ultimate meaning of the Vedas, was, from the viewpoint of the Vedic canon in general, clearly a new idea..»; p. 95: The [oldest] Upanishads in particular were part of the Vedic corpus (…) When these various new ideas were brought together and edited, they were added on to the already existing Vedic…»; p. 294: «When early Jainism came into existence, various ideas mentioned in the extant older Upanishads were current,….».
  355. ^ Klaus G. Witz (1998). The Supreme Wisdom of the Upaniṣads: An Introduction. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 1–2, 23. ISBN 978-81-208-1573-5.; Quote: «In the Aranyakas therefore, thought and inner spiritual awareness started to separate subtler, deeper aspects from the context of ritual performance and myth with which they had been united up to then. This process was then carried further and brought to completion in the Upanishads. (…) The knowledge and attainment of the Highest Goal had been there from the Vedic times. But in the Upanishads inner awareness, aided by major intellectual breakthroughs, arrived at a language in which Highest Goal could be dealt with directly, independent of ritual and sacred lore».
    Edward Fitzpatrick Crangle (1994). The Origin and Development of Early Indian Contemplative Practices. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 58 with footnote 148, 22–29, 87–103, for Upanishads–Buddhist Sutta discussion see 65–72. ISBN 978-3-447-03479-1.
  356. ^ Patrick Olivelle (1992). The Samnyasa Upanisads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation. Oxford University Press. pp. 3–5, 68–71. ISBN 978-0-19-536137-7.;
    Christoph Wulf (2016). Exploring Alterity in a Globalized World. Routledge. pp. 125–126. ISBN 978-1-317-33113-1.; Quote: «But he [Bronkhorst] talks about the simultaneous emergence of a Vedic and a non-Vedic asceticism. (…) [On Olivelle] Thus, the challenge for old Vedic views consisted of a new theology, written down in the early Upanishads like the Brhadaranyaka and the Mundaka Upanishad. The new set of ideas contained the….»
  357. ^ AL Basham (1951), History and Doctrines of the Ajivikas – a Vanished Indian Religion, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1204-8, pp. 94–103
  358. ^ a b Reginald Ray (1999), Buddhist Saints in India, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-513483-4, pp. 237–240, 247–249
  359. ^ Martin Wiltshire (1990), Ascetic Figures Before and in Early Buddhism, De Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-009896-9, p. 293
  360. ^ Samuel (2010), pp. 123–125.
  361. ^ Martin Wiltshire (1990), Ascetic Figures Before and in Early Buddhism, De Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-009896-9, pp. 226–227
  362. ^ Shults (2014), p. 126.
  363. ^ Shults (2014), p. 127.
  364. ^ Shults (2014), pp. 125–129.
  365. ^ P. Billimoria (1988), Śabdapramāṇa: Word and Knowledge, Studies of Classical India Volume 10, Springer, ISBN 978-94-010-7810-8, pp. 1–30
  366. ^ Jaini (2001), pp. 47–48.
  367. ^ a b Mark Siderits (2007). Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction. Ashgate. p. 16 with footnote 3. ISBN 978-0-7546-5369-1.
  368. ^ Skilton A (01 October 2013). Buddhism pg. 337-350. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.004. Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  369. ^ Hirakawa (1993), p. 7.
  370. ^ Schmithausen (1987) «Part I: Earliest Buddhism,» Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit Conference Vol. II: Earliest Buddhism and Madhyamaka, ed. David Seyfort Ruegg and Lambert Schmithausen, Leiden: Kern Institute, pp. 1–4.
  371. ^ Sujato & Brahmali (2015), p. 39–41.
  372. ^ Gethin (2008), p. xviii.
  373. ^ Harvey (1998), p. 3.
  374. ^ a b Vetter (1988), p. ix.
  375. ^ a b Warder (2000).
  376. ^ Vetter (1988), pp. xxi–xxxvii.
  377. ^ a b Schmithausen (1981).
  378. ^ Norman (1992).
  379. ^ a b Gombrich (1997).
  380. ^ a b Bronkhorst (1993), p. vii.
  381. ^ Warder (2000), inside flap.
  382. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), p. viii.
  383. ^ Davidson (2003), p. 147.
  384. ^ a b Jong (1993), p. 25.
  385. ^ Lopez (1995), p. 4.
  386. ^ Mitchell (2002), p. 34.
  387. ^ Reat, Noble Ross. «The Historical Buddha and his Teachings». In: Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophy. Ed. by Potter, Karl H. Vol. VII: Abhidharma Buddhism to 150 AD. Motilal Banarsidass, 1996, pp. 28, 33, 37, 41, 43, 48.
  388. ^ Analayo (2011). A Comparative Study of the Majjhima-nikāya. Dharma Drum Academic Publisher. p. 891.
  389. ^ Salomon, Richard (20 January 2020). «How the Gandharan Manuscripts Change Buddhist History». Lion’s Roar. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 10 October 2020.
  390. ^ Skorupski (1990), p. 5.
  391. ^ Bronkhorst (1998), pp. 4, 11.
  392. ^ Schopen (2002).
  393. ^ Matthews (1986), p. 124.
  394. ^ Bronkhorst (1998), p. 14.
  395. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), pp. 77–78, Section 8.4.3.
  396. ^ Vetter (1988), p. 5, Quote: [T]hey do not teach that one is released by knowing the four noble truths, but by practising the fourth noble truth, the eightfold path, which culminates in right samadhi.
  397. ^ Bronkhorst (1993), p. 107.
  398. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 88–90.
  399. ^ Williams (2005), pp. 175–176.
  400. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 89–90.
  401. ^ Skilton, Andrew. A Concise History of Buddhism. 2004. pp. 49, 64
  402. ^ Sujato, Bhante (2012), Sects & Sectarianism: The Origins of Buddhist Schools, Santipada, ISBN 978-1-921842-08-5
  403. ^ Harvey (1998), pp. 74–75.
  404. ^ Barbara Crandall (2012). Gender and Religion: The Dark Side of Scripture (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 56–58. ISBN 978-1-4411-4871-1. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  405. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 90–91.
  406. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 90–93.
  407. ^ «Abhidhamma Pitaka». Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2008.
  408. ^ Keown & Prebish (2004), p. 485.
  409. ^ Gombrich (2005a), p. 135.
  410. ^ Trainor (2004), pp. 103, 119.
  411. ^ Jason Neelis (2010). Early Buddhist Transmission and Trade Networks: Mobility and Exchange Within and Beyond the Northwestern Borderlands of South Asia. Brill Academic. pp. 102–106. ISBN 978-90-04-18159-5. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  412. ^ Ann Heirman; Stephan Peter Bumbacher (2007). The Spread of Buddhism. Brill Academic. pp. 139–142. ISBN 978-90-04-15830-6.
  413. ^ Kurt A. Behrendt, The Buddhist architecture of Gandhara, Handbuch der Orientalistik Brill, 2004, p. 13
  414. ^ a b Heirman, Ann; Bumbacher, Stephan Peter (editors). The Spread of Buddhism, Brill, p. 57
  415. ^ Xinru Liu (2010). The Silk Road in World History. Oxford University Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-19-533810-2. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  416. ^ Warder2000, p. 278.
  417. ^ «The Discovery of ‘the Oldest Buddhist Manuscripts'» Review article by Enomoto Fumio. The Eastern Buddhist, Vol NS32 Issue I, 2000, p. 161
  418. ^ Bhikkhu Sujato. «Abstract: Sects & Sectarianism. The Origin of the three existing Vinaya lineages: Theravada, Dharmaguptaka, and Mulasarvastivada». Archived from the original on 18 December 2019. Retrieved 12 March 2017.
  419. ^ Kudara, Kogi (2002). «A Rough Sketch of Central Asian Buddhism». Pacific World: Journal of the Institute of Buddhist Studies. 3 (4): 93–107. Archived from the original on 6 April 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  420. ^ a b Drewes, David, Early Indian Mahayana Buddhism I: Recent Scholarship, Religion Compass 4/2 (2010): 55–65, doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00195.x
  421. ^ Buswell (2004), p. 492.
  422. ^ Hirakawa (1993), pp. 252–253, 263, 268.
  423. ^ Warder (2000), p. 335.
  424. ^ Nattier (2003), pp. 193–194.
  425. ^ Williams (2008), pp. 4–5.
  426. ^ Williams (2000), p. 97.
  427. ^ Walser, Joseph, Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture, Columbia University Press, 2005, p. 18.
  428. ^ Walser, Joseph, Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture, Columbia University Press, 2005, pp. 29-34.
  429. ^ Hirakawa (1993), pp. 8–9.
  430. ^ Lusthaus (2002), pp. 236–237.
  431. ^ Warder (2000), p. 442.
  432. ^ Ray, Reginald A (2000) Indestructible Truth: The Living Spirituality of Tibetan Buddhism.
  433. ^ Davidson, Ronald M.,(2002). Indian Esoteric Buddhism: A Social History of the Tantric Movement, Columbia University Press, p. 228, 234.
  434. ^ Davidson, Ronald M. Indian Esoteric Buddhism: A Social History of the Tantric Movement, p. 171.
  435. ^ Sanderson, Alexis. «The Śaiva Age: The Rise and Dominance of Śaivism during the Early Medieval Period.» In: Genesis and Development of Tantrism, edited by Shingo Einoo. Tokyo: Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo, 2009. Institute of Oriental Culture Special Series, pp. 23, 124, 129-31.
  436. ^ Sanderson, Alexis; Vajrayana:, Origin and Function, 1994
  437. ^ Davidson, Ronald M. Indian Esoteric Buddhism: A Social History of the Tantric Movement, p. 204.
  438. ^ Davidson, Ronald M. Indian Esoteric Buddhism: A Social History of the Tantric Movement, p. 217.
  439. ^ Omvedt, Gail (2003). «Buddhism in India: Challenging Brahmanism and Caste», p. 172.
  440. ^ Collins (2000), pp. 184–185.
  441. ^ Zürcher (1972), pp. 22–27.
  442. ^ Hill (2009), pp. 30–31.
  443. ^ Zürcher (1972), p. 23.
  444. ^ Zürcher, Erik. 2007 (1959). The Buddhist Conquest of China: The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism in Early Medieval China. 3rd ed. Leiden: Brill. pp. 32–34
  445. ^ Williams (2008), p. 30.
  446. ^ Dykstra, Yoshiko Kurata; De Bary, William Theodore (2001). Sources of Japanese tradition. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 100. ISBN 0-231-12138-5.
  447. ^ Nguyen Tai Thu. The History of Buddhism in Vietnam. 2008.
  448. ^ McRae, John (2003), Seeing Through Zen, The University Press Group Ltd, pp. 13, 18
  449. ^ Orzech, Charles D. (general editor) (2011). Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia. Brill. p. 4
  450. ^ McRae, John (2003), Seeing Through Zen, The University Press Group Ltd, pp. 13, 19–21
  451. ^ Heng-Ching Shih (1987). Yung-Ming’s Syncretism of Pure Land and Chan, The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 10 (1), p. 117
  452. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 223.
  453. ^ Bronkhorst (2011), pp. 242–246.
  454. ^ Andrew Powell (1989). Living Buddhism. University of California Press. pp. 38–39. ISBN 978-0-520-20410-2.
  455. ^ Lars Fogelin (2015). An Archaeological History of Indian Buddhism. Oxford University Press. pp. 6–11, 218, 229–230. ISBN 978-0-19-994823-9.
  456. ^ Sheila Canby (1993). «Depictions of Buddha Sakyamuni in the Jami al-Tavarikh and the Majma al-Tavarikh». Muqarnas. 10: 299–310. doi:10.2307/1523195. JSTOR 1523195.
  457. ^ John Guy (2014). Lost Kingdoms: Hindu-Buddhist Sculpture of Early Southeast Asia. Metropolitan Museum of Art. pp. 9–11, 14–15, 19–20. ISBN 978-1-58839-524-5. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  458. ^ Skilling (1997).
  459. ^ Myint-U, Thant (2006). The River of Lost Footsteps – Histories of Burma. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 978-0-374-16342-6. pp. 64–65
  460. ^ Cœdès, George (1968). Walter F. Vella, ed. The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. trans. Susan Brown Cowing. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-0368-1.
  461. ^ Gyallay-Pap, Peter. «Notes of the Rebirth of Khmer Buddhism,» Radical Conservativism.
  462. ^ Keown (1996), p. 12.
  463. ^ Smith (2006).
  464. ^ Kenneth W. Morgan (1986). The Path of the Buddha: Buddhism Interpreted by Buddhists. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 410. ISBN 978-81-208-0030-4.
  465. ^ N. Ross Reat (1994). Buddhism: A History. Asian Humanities Press. pp. 19–20. ISBN 978-0-87573-001-1.
  466. ^ Erika Wilson (2012). Emotions and Spirituality in Religions and Spiritual Movements. University Press of America. pp. 137–138. ISBN 978-0-7618-5950-5.
  467. ^ John M Koller (2016). The Indian Way: An Introduction to the Philosophies & Religions of India. Routledge. pp. 157–160. ISBN 978-1-315-50740-8.
  468. ^ Samuels, Jeffrey (July 1997). «The Bodhisattva Ideal in Theravāda Buddhist Theory and Practice: A Reevaluation of the Bodhisattva-Śrāvaka Opposition». Philosophy East and West. University of Hawai’i Press. 47 (3): 399–415. doi:10.2307/1399912. JSTOR 1399912. Archived from the original on 3 February 2021. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
  469. ^ a b Keown & Prebish (2013), «Bodhisattva, Career in the Theravada».
  470. ^ Johnston, William M. (2013) «Encyclopedia of Monasticism» p. 600. Routledge.
  471. ^ Hay, Jeff (2009). «World Religions» p. 189. Greenhaven Publishing LLC.
  472. ^ Hirakawa (1993), p. 68.
  473. ^ Dutt (1988), p. 53.
  474. ^ Hirakawa (1993), p. 34.
  475. ^ Dutt (1988), p. 55.
  476. ^ Dutt (1988), pp. 57–59.
  477. ^ Huu Phuoc Le (2010). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol.
  478. ^ Schedneck, Brooke (2015). Thailand’s International Meditation Centers: Tourism and the Global Commodification of Religious Practices. Routledge
  479. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 378.
  480. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 409–410.
  481. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 403.
  482. ^ Harvey (2013), pp. 414–417.
  483. ^ Buddhism Archived 5 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Buddhist Archived 5 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Etymology, Douglas Harper
  484. ^ Pali Text Society Archived 4 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopaedia Britannica
  485. ^ Prothero, The White Buddhist, 175. Olcott’s approach to Buddhism and the terminology of Protestant Buddhism and «creolization» (Prothero) is extensively discussed in K.A. McMahan,» ‘Creolization’ in American Religious History. The Metaphysical Nature of Henry Steel Olcott, PhD dissertation, unpublished manuscript (Ann Arbor 2008).
  486. ^ Coleman, James William, The New Buddhism: The Western Transformation of an Ancient Tradition, Oxford University Press, pp. 203–204.
  487. ^ Konik (2009), p. ix.
  488. ^ Hayes (2013), p. 172.
  489. ^ Lamb (2001), p. 258.
  490. ^ Gowans (2014), pp. 18–23, 76–88.
  491. ^ Keown (2009), pp. 60–63, 74–85, 185–187.
  492. ^ Fowler (1999), p. 65.
  493. ^ Jan Goldman (2014). The War on Terror Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. pp. 360–362. ISBN 978-1-61069-511-4.
  494. ^ Henderson (2002), p. 42.
  495. ^ Tamney (1998), p. 68.
  496. ^ Francioni, F. (2003). «The Destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan and International Law». European Journal of International Law. 14 (4): 619–651. doi:10.1093/ejil/14.4.619.
  497. ^ «Attack on giant Pakistan Buddha». BBC News. 12 September 2007. Archived from the original on 19 April 2016. Retrieved 4 June 2016.
  498. ^ Paranjpe (1998), p. 351.
  499. ^ Pavāra (2009), pp. xv–xviii.
  500. ^ McMahan, David L. (2004). «Buddhism: Introducing the Buddhist Experience (review)». Philosophy East and West. 54 (2): 268–270. doi:10.1353/pew.2004.0006. S2CID 170189446.
  501. ^ Keown & Prebish (2013), p. 25.
  502. ^ Queen (2013), pp. 524–529.
  503. ^ a b Skaria, A. (2015). «Ambedkar, Marx and the Buddhist Question». Journal of South Asian Studies. 38 (3): 450–452. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1049726.
  504. ^ a b Eleanor Zelliot (2015). Knut A. Jacobsen (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Contemporary India. Taylor & Francis. pp. 13, 361–370. ISBN 978-1-317-40357-9. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 15 August 2017.
  505. ^ Keown & Prebish (2013), pp. 24–26.
  506. ^ Gary Tartakov (2003). Rowena Robinson (ed.). Religious Conversion in India: Modes, Motivations, and Meanings. Oxford University Press. pp. 192–213. ISBN 978-0-19-566329-7. Archived from the original on 6 December 2022. Retrieved 4 December 2018.
  507. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 385.
  508. ^ Williams (2008), pp. 125–128.
  509. ^ Rory Mackenzie (2007). New Buddhist Movements in Thailand: Towards an Understanding of Wat Phra Dhammakaya and Santi Asoke. Routledge. pp. 175–179. ISBN 978-1-134-13262-1. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  510. ^ Martin Marty; R Scott Appleby (1994). Fundamentalisms Observed. University of Chicago Press. pp. 660–667. ISBN 978-0-226-50878-8. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  511. ^ Oppenheimer, Mark (18 December 2014). «The Zen Predator of the Upper East Side». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 4 March 2019. Retrieved 3 March 2019.
  512. ^ Corder, Mike (14 September 2018). «Dalai Lama Meets Alleged Victims of Abuse by Buddhist Gurus». US News. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 4 March 2019.
  513. ^ Marsh, Sarah (5 March 2018). «Buddhist group admits sexual abuse by teachers». The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  514. ^ Sperry, Rod Meade; Atwood, Haleigh (30 March 2018). «Against the Stream to investigate allegations of sexual misconduct by Noah Levine; results expected within a month». Lion’s Roar. Archived from the original on 22 October 2018. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  515. ^ Shute, Joe (9 September 2018). «Why Tibetan Buddhism is facing up to its own abuse scandal». Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021.
  516. ^ Marion Dapsance (28 September 2014). «When Fraud Is Part of a Spiritual Path: A Tibetan Lama’s Plays on Reality and Illusion». In Amanda van Eck Duymaer van Twist (ed.). Minority Religions and Fraud: In Good Faith. Ashgate Publishing. p. 171. ISBN 978-1-4724-0913-3. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
  517. ^ Sperry, Rod Meade (11 August 2017). «After allegations, Sogyal Rinpoche retires from Rigpa». Lion’s Roar. Archived from the original on 17 August 2017. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  518. ^ Fang, Litian (2018). «Chinese Buddhism and Traditional Culture,» p. 212. Routledge.
  519. ^ Dreyfus, George (1997). Recognizing Reality: Dharmakirti’s Philosophy and its Tibetan Interpretations. SUNY. pp. 15–16.[ISBN missing]
  520. ^ Dutt (1988), pp. 332–333.
  521. ^ Cush, Denise. «British Buddhism and the New Age» in The Encyclopedic Sourcebook of New Age Religions, editedg by James R. Lewis.
  522. ^ Fromm, Erich (1989, 2002). The Art of Being. NY: Continuum. ISBN 0-8264-0673-4.
  523. ^ Kabat-Zinn, Jon (2005). Coming to Our Senses: Healing Ourselves and the World Through Mindfulness. pp. 12–13. Hyperion. ISBN 0-7868-8654-4.
  524. ^ Hoffer (ed.); Freud and the Buddha: The Couch and the Cushion.
  525. ^ Fromm, Erich, D. T. Suzuki & Richard De Martino (1960). Zen Buddhism and Psychoanalysis. pp. 77–78, NY: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-090175-6.
  526. ^ Johnson & Grim (2013), pp. 34–37.
  527. ^ Harvey (2013), p. 5.
  528. ^ People’s Republic of China: Religions and Churches Statistical Overview 2011 Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Katharina Wenzel-Teuber (2011), China Zentrum, Germany
  529. ^ «ASIA SOCIETY: THE COLLECTION IN CONTEXT». www.asiasocietymuseum.org. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  530. ^ Planet, Lonely. «Religion & Belief in Hong Kong, China». Lonely Planet. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  531. ^ «Religion in Macau — Festivals and Places of Worship — Holidify». www.holidify.com. Archived from the original on 22 September 2020. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  532. ^ Kuah, Khun Eng (1991). «State and Religion: Buddhism and NationalBuilding in Singapore». Pacific Viewpoint. 32 (1): 24–42. doi:10.1111/apv.321002. ISSN 2638-4825.
  533. ^ «Vietnam Buddhism». Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  534. ^ «Global Religious Landscape – Religious Composition by Country». The Pew Forum. Archived from the original on 1 January 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  535. ^ «ФСО доложила о межконфессиональных отношениях в РФ». ZNAK. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2017.
  536. ^ «The 2013 Census and religion» (PDF). royalsociety.org.nz. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 February 2018. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  537. ^ Taonga, New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage Te Manatu. «Buddhists». teara.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 17 October 2019. Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  538. ^ «Buddhist Channel | Buddhism News, Headlines | World | Burmese Buddhist monastery opens in Finland». Buddhistchannel.tv. 5 January 2009. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2021.

Cited sources

Printed sources

  • Ajahn Sucitto (2010), Turning the Wheel of Truth: Commentary on the Buddha’s First Teaching, Shambhala
  • Anderson, Carol (1999), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon, Routledge
  • Anderson, Carol (2003). «Four Noble Truths». In Buswell, Robert E. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Macmillan Reference Books. ISBN 978-0-02-865718-9.
  • Anderson, Carol (2013), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravada Buddhist Canon, Routledge
  • Arbel, Keren (2016), Early Buddhist Meditation: The Four Jhanas as the Actualization of Insight, Routledge, ISBN 9781317383994
  • Armstrong, Karen (2004), Buddha, Penguin Press, ISBN 978-0-14-303436-0
  • Aronson, Harvey B. (1980). Love and Sympathy in Theravāda Buddhism. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-1403-5. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  • Bareau, André (1955), ‘Les Sectes bouddhiques du Petit Véhicule, Saigon: École Française d’Extrême-Orient
  • Berzin, Alexander (2006), Primary Minds and the 51 Mental Factors, archived from the original on 20 September 2022, retrieved 18 September 2022
  • Bodhi, Bhikkhu (2000), The Connected Discourses of the Buddha. A Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya, Wisdom Publications, ISBN 978-0-86171-331-8
  • Bodhi, Bhikkhu (2005). In the Buddha’s Words: An Anthology of Discourses from the Pali Canon. Somerville: Wisdom Publications. ISBN 978-0-86171-491-9.
  • Bodhi, Bhikkhu (2010), The Noble Eightfold Path: The Way to the End of Suffering, Buddhist Publication Society, ISBN 9789552401169
  • Bond, George D. (1992), The Buddhist Revival in Sri Lanka: Religious Tradition, Reinterpretation and Response, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
  • Brazier, David (2001), The Feeling Buddha, Robinson Publishing
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (1998), «Did the Buddha Believe in Karma and Rebirth?», Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 21 (1): 1–20, archived from the original on 29 November 2014, retrieved 15 November 2014
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (2007), Greater Magadha, Studies the Culture of Early India. Series: Handbook of Oriental Studies, Section 2 South Asia Series, Brill Academic Publishers Inc., ISBN 978-90-04-11519-4
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (2011). Buddhism in the Shadow of Brahmanism. Brill Academic. ISBN 978-90-04-20140-8.
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (2013). Buddhist Teaching in India. Wisdom Publications. ISBN 978-0-86171-811-5. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  • Bucknell, Rod (1984), «The Buddhist to Liberation: An Analysis of the Listing of Stages», The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 7 (2), archived from the original on 25 May 2017, retrieved 28 May 2016
  • Bucknell, Robert S. (1993), «Reinterpreting the Jhanas», Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 16 (2)
  • Buswell, Robert E. Jr.; Gimello, Robert M., eds. (1992), Paths to Liberation. The Marga and its Transformations in Buddhist Thought, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
  • Buswell, Robert E. Jr.; Lopez, Donald Jr. (2003), The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, Princeton University Press
  • Buswell, Robert E., ed. (2004), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, MacMillan Reference Books, ISBN 978-0-02-865718-9
  • Carrithers, Michael (1983), The Buddha, Oxford [England]; New York: Oxford University Press
  • Carrithers, Michael (1986), Founders of faith, Oxford [England]; New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-283066-1
  • Carter, John Ross (1987), «Four Noble Truths», in Jones, Lindsay (ed.), MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religions, MacMillan
  • Chen, Naichen (13 March 2017). The Great Prajna Paramita Sutra, Volume 1. Wheatmark, Inc. ISBN 978-1-62787-457-1. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
  • Choong, Mun-keat (2000), The Fundamental Teachings of Early Buddhism: A Comparative Study Based on the Sutranga Portion of the Pali Samyutta-Nikaya and the Chinese Samyuktagama, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag
  • Choong, Mun-Keat (1999), The Notion of Emptiness in Early Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1649-7, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Cohen, Robert S. (2006). Beyond Enlightenment: Buddhism, Religion, Modernity. Routledge.
  • Conze, Edward (2013), Buddhist Thought in India: Three Phases of Buddhist Philosophy, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-134-54231-4, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Clarke, Peter B.; Beyer, Peter (2009), The World’s Religions: continuities and transformations, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-39725-4
  • Collins, Randall (2000), The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change, Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-00187-9, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 12 October 2015
  • Collins, Steven (1998). Nirvana and Other Buddhist Felicities. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-57054-1. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  • Conze, Edward (2001), The Perfection of Wisdom in Eight Thousand Lines and its Verse Summary, Grey Fox Press, ISBN 978-0-87704-049-1
  • Coogan, Michael D., ed. (2003), The Illustrated Guide to World Religions, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-521997-5, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Cousins, L.S. (1996), «The Dating of the Historical Buddha: A Review Article», Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Series 3 (6.1): 57–63, doi:10.1017/S1356186300014760, S2CID 162929573, archived from the original on 20 December 2010, retrieved 11 July 2007; reprinted in Williams, Buddhism, volume I; NB in the online transcript a little text has been accidentally omitted: in section 4, between «… none of the other contributions in this section envisage a date before 420 B.C.» and «to 350 B.C.» insert «Akira Hirakawa defends the short chronology and Heinz Bechert himself sets a range from 400 B.C.»
  • Davidson, Ronald M. (2003), Indian Esoteric Buddhism: A Social History of the Tantric Movement, New York: Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0-231-12619-9
  • Dutt, Sukumar (1988) [1962]. Buddhist Monks And Monasteries of India: Their History And Contribution To Indian Culture. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0498-2.
  • Eliade, Mircea; et al., eds. (1987), The Encyclopedia of religion, New York: Macmillan, ISBN 978-0-02-909480-8
  • Eliot, Charles (1935), Japanese Buddhism, London: Edward Arnold & Co.
  • Embree, Ainslie T.; Hay, Stephen N.; de Bary, Wm. Theodore, eds. (1988), Sources of Indian Tradition: From the Beginning to 1800, vol. 1, New York: Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0-231-06651-8
  • Emmanuel, Steven M., ed. (2013), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy (hardback), Wiley-Blackwell, ISBN 978-0-470-65877-2, archived from the original (hardback) on 16 March 2015
  • Emmanuel, Steven M., ed. (2016), A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy (paperback), Wiley-Blackwell, ISBN 978-1-119-14466-3, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016 – via Google Books
  • Fowler, Merv (1999), Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN 978-1-898723-66-0
  • Frauwallner, Erich (1973), History of Indian Philosophy: The philosophy of the Veda and of the epic. The Buddha and the Jina. The Sāmkhya and the classical Yoga-system, Motilal Banarsidass
  • Fuller, Paul (2005). The Notion of Diṭṭhi in Theravāda Buddhism: The Point of View. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-34293-3. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
  • Fuller-Sasaki, Ruth (2008), The Record of Lin-Ji, University of Hawaii Press
  • Funayama, Tōru (2004), «The Acceptance of Buddhist Precepts by the Chinese in the Fifth Century», Journal of Asian History, 38 (2): 97–120, JSTOR 41933379
  • Gethin, Rupert (1998), Foundations of Buddhism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-289223-2
  • Gethin, Rupert (2001) [1992], The Buddhist Path to Awakening: A Study of the Bodhi-Pakkhiyā Dhammā (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oneworld Publications, ISBN 978-1-85168-285-0
  • Gethin, Rupert (2008), Sayings of the Buddha, Oxford University Press
  • Getz, Daniel A. (2004), «Precepts», in Buswell, Robert E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Macmillan Reference US, Thomson Gale, ISBN 978-0-02-865720-2, archived from the original on 23 December 2017, retrieved 29 November 2018
  • Goleman, Daniel (2008). Destructive Emotions: A Scientific Dialogue with the Dalai Lama. Bantam. Kindle Edition.
  • Gombrich, Richard (1984), The World of Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-0-500-25089-1
  • Gombrich, Richard F. (1988), Theravāda Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo, London: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-07585-5
  • Gombrich, Richard F. (1997), How Buddhism Began, Munshiram Manoharlal
  • Gombrich, Richard F. «Kindness and compassion as a means to Nirvana». In Williams (2005a).
  • Gombrich, Richard F. (2006). Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo (2nd ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-90352-8.
  • Gombrich, Richard (2007), Religious Experience in Early Buddhism, OCHS Library, archived from the original on 1 July 2016, retrieved 29 May 2016
  • Gowans, Christopher (2004). Philosophy of the Buddha: An Introduction. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-46973-4. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  • Gowans, Christopher W. «Ethical Thought in Indian Buddhism». In Emmanuel (2013), pp. 429–451.
  • Gowans, Christopher W. (2014), Buddhist Moral Philosophy: An Introduction, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-317-65935-8
  • Guenther, Herbert V.; Kawamura, Leslie S. (1975), Mind in Buddhist Psychology: A Translation of Ye-shes rgyal-mtshan’s «The Necklace of Clear Understanding» (Kindle ed.), Dharma Publishing
  • Gyatso, Geshe Kelsang (1995), Introduction to Buddhism: An Explanation of the Buddhist Way of Life, Tharpa Publications, ISBN 978-0-9789067-7-1
  • Harvey, Graham (2016), Religions in Focus: New Approaches to Tradition and Contemporary Practices, Routledge
  • Harvey, Peter (1998) [1990], An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-31333-9
  • Harvey, Peter (1995), The Selfless Mind, Curzon Press
  • Harvey, Peter (2000), An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues (PDF), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-511-07584-1, archived from the original (PDF) on 12 April 2019, retrieved 29 November 2018
  • Harvey, Peter (2013). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-67674-8. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 12 October 2015.
  • Hawkins, Bradley K. (1999), The Pocket Idiots Guide: Buddhism, Laurence King (Penguin, Alpha), ISBN 978-0-02-864459-2
  • Hayes, Richard P. (2013), «The Internet as Window onto American Buddhism», in Queen, Christopher; Williams, Duncan Ryuken (eds.), American Buddhism: Methods and Findings in Recent Scholarship, Routledge
  • Henderson, Carol E. (2002), Culture and Customs of India, Greenwood Publishing Group
  • Hill, John E. (2009), Through the Jade Gate to Rome: A Study of the Silk Routes during the Later Han Dynasty, 1st to 2nd Centuries CE, Charleston, South Carolina: BookSurge, ISBN 978-1-4392-2134-1
  • Hirakawa, Akira (1993), Groner, Paul (ed.), A History of Indian Buddhism: From Śākyamuni to Early Mahāyāna, translated by Groner, Paul, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-0955-0, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Hodge, Stephen (2002), Zen Masterclass, Godsfield Press
  • Hookham, S.K. (1991), The Buddha Within: Tathagatagarbha Doctrine According to the Shentong Interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhaga, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-0357-0, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Horigan, D.P. (1996), «Of Compassion and Capital Punishment: A Buddhist Perspective on the Death Penalty», American Journal of Jurisprudence, 41: 271–288, doi:10.1093/ajj/41.1.271, archived from the original on 16 September 2015, retrieved 29 November 2018
  • Huxter, Malcolm (2016), Healing the Heart and Mind with Mindfulness: Ancient Path, Present Moment, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-317-50540-2, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 29 May 2016
  • Jaini, Padmanabh S. (2001), Collected Paper on Buddhist Studies, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1776-0
  • Johansson, Rune Edvin Anders (1981), Pali Buddhist Texts: Explained to the Beginner, Psychology Press
  • Johnson, Todd M.; Grim, Brian J. (2013). The World’s Religions in Figures: An Introduction to International Religious Demography (PDF). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 34–37. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 October 2013.
  • Jong, J.W. de (1993), «The Beginnings of Buddhism», The Eastern Buddhist, 26 (2)
  • Juergensmeyer, Mark; Roof, Wade Clark (2011), Encyclopedia of Global Religion, Sage Publications, ISBN 978-1-4522-6656-5, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Kalupahana, David (1966). «Sarvastivada and its theory of sarvam asti». University of Ceylon Review. 24: 94–105.
  • Kanno, Hiroshi (2004). «Huisi’s Perspective on the Lotus Sutra as Seen Through the Meaning of the Course of Ease and Bliss in the Lotus Sutra» (PDF). Journal of the Institute of Oriental Philosophy. 14: 146–166. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 5 February 2010.
  • Kasulis, T.P. (2006), «Zen as a Social Ethics of Responsiveness» (PDF), Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 13: 1–12, archived from the original (PDF) on 25 March 2009
  • Keown, Damien (1996), Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press
  • Keown, Damien (2003), Dictionary of Buddhism, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-157917-2
  • Keown, Damien; Prebish, Charles S. (2004), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, London: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-31414-5
  • Keown, Damien (2009), Buddhism, Sterling Publishing, ISBN 978-1-4027-6883-5
  • Keown, Damien; Prebish, Charles S. (2010), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, London: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-55624-8
  • Keown, Damien; Prebish, Charles S. (2013). Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-98588-1. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  • Keown, Damien. «Buddhism and Biomedical Issues». In Emmanuel (2013), pp. 613–630.
  • Kingsland, James (2016), Siddhartha’s Brain: Unlocking the Ancient Science of Enlightenment, HarperCollins
  • Klostermaier, Klaus (2010). A Survey of Hinduism (3rd ed.). State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-8011-3.
  • Kochumuttom, Thomas A. (1999), A buddhist Doctrine of Experience. A New Translation and Interpretation of the Works of Vasubandhu the Yogacarin, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass
  • Konik, Adrian (2009), Buddhism and Transgression: The Appropriation of Buddhism in the Contemporary West, BRIIL
  • Krishan, Yuvraj (1997). The Doctrine of Karma: Its Origin and Development in Brāhmaṇical, Buddhist, and Jaina Traditions. Vidya Bhavan. ISBN 978-81-208-1233-8. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  • Kuan, Tse-fu (2007). Mindfulness in Early Buddhism: New Approaches Through Psychology and Textual Analysis of Pali, Chinese and Sanskrit Sources. Routledge.
  • Kunsang, Erik Pema (2004), Gateway to Knowledge, Vol. 1, North Atlantic Books
  • Lamb, Christopher (2001), «Cosmology, myth and symbolism», in Harvey, Peter (ed.), Buddhism, Bloomsbury Publishing
  • Ledgerwood, Judy (2008), «Buddhist practice in rural Kandal province 1960 and 2003», in Kent, Alexandra; Chandler, David (eds.), People of Virtue: Reconfiguring Religion, Power and Moral Order in Cambodia Today, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, ISBN 978-87-7694-036-2
  • Lindtner, Christian (1997), Master of Wisdom, Dharma Publishing
  • Lindtner, Christian (1999), «From Brahmanism to Buddhism», Asian Philosophy, 9: 5–37, doi:10.1080/09552369908575487
  • Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (1995), Buddhism in Practice, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-04442-2
  • Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (2001), The Story of Buddhism, HarperCollins
  • Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (2009), Buddhism and Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, University of Chicago Press
  • Lusthaus, Dan (2002), Buddhist Phenomenology, Routledge
  • Maezumi, Taizan; Cook, Francis Dojun (2007), «The Eight Awarenesses of the Enlightened Person»: Dogen Zenji’s Hachidainingaku», in Maezumi, Taizan; Glassman, Bernie (eds.), The Hazy Moon of Enlightenment, Wisdom Publications
  • Makransky, John J. (1997), Buddhahood Embodied: Sources of Controversy in India and Tibet, SUNY
  • Matthews, Bruce (1986), «Post-Classical Developments In The Concepts of Karma and Rebirth in Theravada Buddhism», in Ronald W. Neufeldt (ed.), Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments, SUNY
  • McClelland, Norman C. (2010), Encyclopedia of Reincarnation and Karma, McFarland, ISBN 978-0-7864-5675-8, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • McFarlane, Stewart (2001), «Making Moral Decisions», in Peter Harvey (ed.), Buddhism, Continuum, ISBN 978-0-8264-5350-1
  • Métraux, Daniel A. (2010). How Soka Gakkai Became a Global Buddhist Movement. Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press. p. vi. ISBN 978-0-7734-3758-6.
  • Miller, Barbara Stoler (1996), Yoga: Discipline of Freedom: the Yoga Sutra Attributed to Patanjali; a Translation of the Text, with Commentary, Introduction, and Glossary of Keywords, University of California Press
  • Mitchell, Donald W. (2002), Buddhism: introducing the Buddhist experience, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-513951-8
  • Mizuno, Kogen (1996), Essentials of Buddhism: basic terminology and concepts of Buddhist philosophy and practice, Tokyo: Kosei, ISBN 978-4-333-01683-9
  • Morgan, Peggy; Lawton, Clive A., eds. (2007), Ethical Issues in Six Religious Traditions (2nd ed.), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, ISBN 978-0-7486-2330-3
  • Ñāṇamoli, Bhikkhu; Bodhi, Bhikkhu (1995). The middle length discourses of the Buddha: a new translation of the Majjhima Nikaya. Wisdom Pub.
  • Nattier, Jan (2003), A Few Good Men: The Bodhisattva Path according to The Inquiry of Ugra (Ugrapariprccha), University of Hawai’i Press, ISBN 978-0-8248-2607-9
  • Nattier, Jan; Prebish, Charles S. (1977), «Mahāsāṅghika Origins: the beginnings of Buddhist sectarianism in History of Religions», History of Religions, 16 (3): 237–272, doi:10.1086/462767, S2CID 161252419
  • Norman, K.R. (1992), «The Four Noble Truths», Collected Papers, vol. 2, Pali Text Society (published 2003), pp. 210–223
  • Norman, K.R. (1997), A Philological Approach to Buddhism. The Bukkyo Dendo Kybkai Lectures 1994, School of Oriental and African Studies (University of London)
  • Nyanatiloka (1980), Buddhist Dictionary, Buddhist Publication Society
  • Oldenberg, Hermann (1991), The Doctrine of the Upanishads and Early Buddhism, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass (reprint)
  • Onians, Isabelle (2001), Tantric Buddhist Apologetics, or Antinomianism as a Norm (PhD dissertation), Oxford, Trinity Term
  • Paranjpe, A.C. (1998), Self and identity in modern psychology and Indian thought, Springer, ISBN 978-0-306-45844-6, retrieved 10 March 2012
  • Pavāra, Urmilā (2009), The weave of my life: a Dalit woman’s memoirs, Columbia University Press, ISBN 978-0-231-14900-6, retrieved 10 March 2012
  • Payne, Richard K. (2006), Tantric Buddhism in East Asia, Boston: Wisdom Publications, ISBN 978-0-86171-487-2
  • Polak, Grzegorz (2011), Reexamining Jhana: Towards a Critical Reconstruction of Early Buddhist Soteriology, UMCS
  • Powers, John (2007). Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications. ISBN 978-1-55939-282-2.
  • Prebish, Charles (1993), Historical Dictionary of Buddhism, The Scarecrow Press, ISBN 978-0-8108-2698-4
  • Prebish, Charles S.; Keown, Damien (2006). Introducing Buddhism. Routledge.
  • Queen, Christopher S.; King, Sallie B., eds. (1996). Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-2844-3.
  • Queen, Christopher S. «Socially Engaged Buddhism: Emerging Patterns of Theory and Practice». In Emmanuel (2013), pp. 524–535.
  • Rahula, Walpola (1974), What the Buddha Taught, Grove Press, ISBN 978-955-9219-19-4
  • Rahula, Walpola (2014), What the Buddha Taught, Oneworld Classics, ISBN 978-1-78074-000-3, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Ratanakul, P. (2007), «The Dynamics of Tradition and Change in Theravada Buddhism», The Journal of Religion and Culture, 1 (1): 233–257, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.505.2366, ISSN 1905-8144
  • Rhys Davids, T.W.; Stede, William, eds. (1921–1925), The Pali Text Society’s Pali–English dictionary, Chipstead, London: Pali Text Society, archived from the original on 25 July 2021, retrieved 20 February 2021
  • Roach, Peter (2011), Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary (18th ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-15253-2
  • Robinson, Richard H.; Johnson, Willard L. (1982), The Buddhist Religion: A Historical Introduction (3rd ed.), Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing, ISBN 978-0-534-01027-0
  • Robinson, Richard H.; Johnson, Willard L. (1997). Buddhist Religions: A Historical Introduction (4th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 978-0-534-55858-1.
  • Rose, Kenneth (2016), Yoga, Meditation, and Mysticism: Contemplative Universals and Meditative Landmarks, Bloomsbury
  • Rhys-Davids, T.W.; Stede, William, eds. (1921–25), The Pali Text Society’s Pali–English dictionary, Pali Text Society)
  • Samuel, Geoffrey (2008), The Origins of Yoga and Tantra, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-69534-3
  • Samuel, Geoffrey (2010), The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century, Cambridge University Press
  • Sangpo, Gelong Lodro; Dhammajoti, Bhikkhu K.L. (2012), Abhidharmakosa-Bhasya of Vasubandhu: Volume 3, Motilal Banarsidass
  • Sarbacker, Stuart Ray (2021), Tracing the Path of Yoga: The History and Philosophy of Indian Mind-Body Discipline, State University of New York Press
  • Schmidt-Leukel, Perry (2006), Understanding Buddhism, Dunedin Academic Press, ISBN 978-1-903765-18-0
  • Schmithausen, Lambert (1981), «On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of ‘Liberating Insight’ and ‘Enlightenment’ in Early Buddhism».», Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus (Gedenkschrift für Ludwig Alsdorf), Wiesbaden: von Klaus Bruhn und Albrecht Wezler, pp. 199–250
  • Schmithausen, Lambert (1986), «Critical Response», in Ronald W. Neufeldt (ed.), Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments, SUNY
  • Schopen, Gregory (2002), Bones, Stones, and Buddhist Monks, University of Hawai’i Press
  • Schuhmacher, Stephen; Woener, Gert, eds. (1991), The Shambhala Dictionary of Buddhism and Zen, translated by Kohn, Michael H., Shambhala, ISBN 978-0-87773-520-5
  • Shankman, Richard (2008), The Experience of Samadhi: An In-depth Exploration of Buddhist Meditation, Shambhala
  • Shults, Brett (2014), «On the Buddha’s Use of Some Brahmanical Motifs in Pali Texts», Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies, 6: 121–129, archived from the original on 27 April 2016, retrieved 20 May 2016
  • Skilling, Peter (1992). «The Raksā Literature of the Śrāvakayāna» (PDF). Journal of the Pali Text Society. 16: 109–182. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 September 2015.
  • Skilling, Peter (Summer 1997). «The Advent of Theravada Buddhism to Mainland South-east Asia». Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. 20 (1): 93–108. Archived from the original on 19 May 2018. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  • Skorupski, Tadeusz, ed. (1990), Buddhist Forum, vol I, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-7286-0162-8
  • Smith (2006), «Buddhism», in Juergensmeyer, Mark (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Global Religions, Oxford Handbooks in Religion and Theology, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-513798-9
  • Southwold, Martin (1978). «Buddhism and The Definition of Religion». Man. 13 (3): 362–379. doi:10.2307/2801935. JSTOR 2801935.
  • Spiro, Melford E. (1982), Buddhism and Society: A Great Tradition and Its Burmese Vicissitudes, University of California Press
  • Stuart-Fox, Martin (1989), «Jhana and Buddhist Scholasticism», Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 12 (2)
  • Sujato, Bhante; Brahmali, Bhikkhu (2015), The Authenticity of the Early Buddhist Texts (PDF), Chroniker Press, ISBN 978-1-312-91150-5, archived (PDF) from the original on 24 December 2015
  • Swearer, Donald (2004), Becoming the Buddha: the ritual of image consecration in Thailand, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-11435-4
  • Tamney, Joseph B. (1998), «Buddhism», in William H. Swatos (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion and Society, Rowman Altamira
  • Terwiel, Barend Jan (2012), Monks and Magic: Revisiting a Classic Study of Religious Ceremonies in Thailand (PDF), Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, ISBN 978-87-7694-101-7, archived (PDF) from the original on 19 August 2018
  • Trainor, Kevin (2004), Buddhism: The Illustrated Guide, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-517398-7, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Thich Nhat Hanh (1974), The Heart of the Buddha’s Teaching, Broadway Books, ISBN 978-0-7679-0369-1
  • Vetter, Tilmann (1988), The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, Brill
  • Warder, A.K. (2000), Indian Buddhism, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
  • Wayman, Alex (1997), «Introduction», Calming the Mind and Discerning the Real: Buddhist Meditation and the Middle View, from the Lam Rim Chen Mo Tson-kha-pa, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
  • Welch, B. Alan (1967), The practice of Chinese Buddhism, 1900–1950, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  • Wells, John C. (2008), Longman Pronunciation Dictionary (3rd ed.), Longman, ISBN 978-1-4058-8118-0
  • White, Kenneth (2005), The Role of Bodhicitta in Buddhist Enlightenment Including a Translation into English of Bodhicitta-sastra, Benkemmitsu-nikyoron, and Sammaya-kaijo, Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press, ISBN 0-7734-5985-5
  • Wilson, Jeff (2010), Saṃsāra and Rebirth, in Buddhism, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/obo/9780195393521-0141, ISBN 978-0-19-539352-1
  • Williams, Paul (1989), Mahayana Buddhism: the doctrinal foundations, London: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-02537-9
  • Williams, Paul (2000), Buddhist Thought in India
  • Williams, Paul (2002), Buddhist Thought (Kindle ed.), Taylor & Francis
  • Williams, Paul, ed. (2005), Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies, 8 volumes, London: Routledge
  • Williams, Paul, ed. (2005a), Buddhism: The early Buddhist schools and doctrinal history; Theravāda doctrine, Volume 2, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 978-0-415-33228-6, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 12 October 2015
  • Williams, Paul (2005b). Buddhism: The origins and nature of Mahāyāna Buddhism; Some Mahāyāna religious topics. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-33229-3. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  • Williams, Paul (2005c). Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-33226-2. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2016.
  • Williams, Paul (2008), Mahayana Buddhism: the doctrinal foundations, London: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-35653-4, archived from the original on 11 January 2023, retrieved 10 July 2016
  • Williams, Paul; Tribe, Anthony; Wynne, Alexander (2012), Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition (2nd ed.), Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-57179-1 ISBN 978-1-136-52088-4
  • Wynne, Alexander (2007), The Origin of Buddhist Meditation, Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-42387-8
  • Yin Shun (1998), The Way to Buddhahood: Instructions from a Modern Chinese Master, translated by Yeung H. Wing, Wisdom Publications, ISBN 978-0-86171-133-8
  • Zürcher, Erik (1972), The Buddhist Conquest of China, Leiden: E.J. Brill

Online sources

  • The Global Religious Landscape: A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’s Major Religious Groups as of 2010 (PDF), Pew Research Center, 2012, archived from the original (PDF) on 6 August 2013, retrieved 9 October 2013
    • «Buddhists». Global Religious Landscape. Pew Research Center. 18 December 2012. Archived from the original on 8 April 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2015.
  1. ^ a b c Donald Lopez, Four Noble Truths Archived 18 May 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica.
  2. ^ Thanissaro Bhikkhu, The Truth of Rebirth And Why it Matters for Buddhist Practice Archived 22 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ «Maha-parinibbana Sutta: Last Days of the Buddha». www.accesstoinsight.org. Archived from the original on 25 June 2020. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
  4. ^ Patrick Olivelle (2012), Encyclopædia Britannica, «Moksha (Indian religions)» Archived 30 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  5. ^ Ajahn Sumedho, The First Noble Truth Archived 5 November 1999 at the Wayback Machine (nb: links to index-page; click «The First Noble Truth» for correct page.
  6. ^ «Tibetan Buddhism». American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Houghton Mifflin Company. 2004. Archived from the original on 9 June 2008. Retrieved 7 July 2007.

Further reading

  • Trainor, Kevin; Arai, Paula, eds. (2022). The Oxford Handbook of Buddhist Practice. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-063295-3. Archived from the original on 29 May 2022. Retrieved 12 June 2022.

External links

  • Worldwide Buddhist Information and Education Network, BuddhaNet
  • Early Buddhist texts, translations, and parallels, SuttaCentral
  • East Asian Buddhist Studies: A Reference Guide, Robert Buswell and William Bodiford, UCLA
  • Buddhist Bibliography (China and Tibet), East West Center
  • Ten Philosophical Questions: Buddhism, Richard Hayes, Leiden University
  • Readings in Theravada Buddhism, Access to Insight
  • Readings in Zen Buddhism, Hakuin Ekaku (Ed: Monika Bincsik)
  • Readings in Sanskrit Buddhist Canon, Nagarjuna Institute – UWest
  • Readings in Buddhism, Vipassana Research Institute (English, Southeast Asian and Indian Languages)
  • Religion and Spirituality: Buddhism at Open Directory Project
  • The Future of Buddhism series, from Patheos
  • Buddhist Art, Smithsonian
  • Buddhism – objects, art and history, V&A Museum
  • Buddhism for Beginners, Tricycle

Buddhism is a faith that was founded by Siddhartha Gautama (“the Buddha”) more than 2,500 years ago in India. With about 500 million followers, scholars consider Buddhism one of the major world religions. Its practice has historically been most prominent in East and Southeast Asia, but its influence is growing in the West. Many Buddhist ideas and philosophies overlap with those of other faiths.

Buddhism Beliefs

Some key Buddhism beliefs include:

  • Followers of Buddhism don’t acknowledge a supreme god or deity. They instead focus on achieving enlightenment—a state of inner peace and wisdom. When followers reach this spiritual echelon, they’re said to have experienced nirvana.
  • The religion’s founder, Buddha, is considered an extraordinary being, but not a god. The word Buddha means “enlightened.”
  • The path to enlightenment is attained by utilizing morality, meditation and wisdom. Buddhists often meditate because they believe it helps awaken truth.
  • There are many philosophies and interpretations within Buddhism, making it a tolerant and evolving religion.
  • Some scholars don’t recognize Buddhism as an organized religion, but rather, a “way of life” or a “spiritual tradition.”
  • Buddhism encourages its people to avoid self-indulgence but also self-denial.
  • Buddha’s most important teachings, known as The Four Noble Truths, are essential to understanding the religion.
  • Buddhists embrace the concepts of karma (the law of cause and effect) and reincarnation (the continuous cycle of rebirth).
  • Followers of Buddhism can worship in temples or in their own homes.
  • Buddhist monks, or bhikkhus, follow a strict code of conduct, which includes celibacy.
  • There is no single Buddhist symbol, but a number of images have evolved that represent Buddhist beliefs, including the lotus flower, the eight-spoked dharma wheel, the Bodhi tree and the swastika (an ancient symbol whose name means «well-being» or «good fortune» in Sanskrit). 

Swastika in Buddhism

In Pictures Ltd./Corbis/Getty Images

A gold Buddha figure at the Longhua Temple in the south of Shanghai, first built in A.D. 242.

Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism who later became known as “the Buddha,” lived during the 5th century B.C. 

Gautama was born into a wealthy family as a prince in present-day Nepal. Although he had an easy life, Gautama was moved by suffering in the world. 

He decided to give up his lavish lifestyle and endure poverty. When this didn’t fulfill him, he promoted the idea of the “Middle Way,” which means existing between two extremes. Thus, he sought a life without social indulgences but also without deprivation.

After six years of searching, Buddhists believe Gautama found enlightenment while meditating under a Bodhi tree. He spent the rest of his life teaching others about how to achieve this spiritual state.

When Gautama passed away around 483 B.C., his followers began to organize a religious movement. Buddha’s teachings became the foundation for what would develop into Buddhism.

In the 3rd century B.C., Ashoka the Great, the Mauryan Indian emperor, made Buddhism the state religion of India. Buddhist monasteries were built, and missionary work was encouraged.

Over the next few centuries, Buddhism began to spread beyond India. The thoughts and philosophies of Buddhists became diverse, with some followers interpreting ideas differently than others.

In the sixth century, the Huns invaded India and destroyed hundreds of Buddhist monasteries, but the intruders were eventually driven out of the country.

Islam began to spread quickly in the region during the Middle Ages, forcing Buddhism into the background.

Types of Buddhism

Today, many forms of Buddhism exist around the world. The three main types that represent specific geographical areas include:

  • Theravada Buddhism: Prevalent in Thailand, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Laos and Burma
  • Mahayana Buddhism: Prevalent in China, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Singapore and Vietnam
  • Tibetan Buddhism: Prevalent in Tibet, Nepal, Mongolia, Bhutan, and parts of Russia and northern India

Each of these types reveres certain texts and has slightly different interpretations of Buddha’s teachings. There are also several subsects of Buddhism, including Zen Buddhism and Nirvana Buddhism.

Some forms of Buddhism incorporate ideas of other religions and philosophies, such as Taoism and Bon.

Dharma

Buddha’s teachings are known as “dharma.” He taught that wisdom, kindness, patience, generosity and compassion were important virtues.

Specifically, all Buddhists live by five moral precepts, which prohibit:

  • Killing living things
  • Taking what is not given
  • Sexual misconduct
  • Lying
  • Using drugs or alcohol

Four Noble Truths

The Four Noble Truths, which Buddha taught, are:

  • The truth of suffering (dukkha)
  • The truth of the cause of suffering (samudaya)
  • The truth of the end of suffering (nirhodha)
  • The truth of the path that frees us from suffering (magga)

Collectively, these principles explain why humans hurt and how to overcome suffering.

Eightfold Path

The Buddha taught his followers that the end of suffering, as described in the fourth Noble Truths, could be achieved by following an Eightfold Path. 

In no particular order, the Eightfold Path of Buddhism teaches the following ideals for ethical conduct, mental disciple and achieving wisdom:

  • Right understanding (Samma ditthi)
  • Right thought (Samma sankappa)
  • Right speech (Samma vaca)
  • Right action (Samma kammanta)
  • Right livelihood (Samma ajiva)
  • Right effort (Samma vayama)
  • Right mindfulness (Samma sati)
  • Right concentration (Samma samadhi)

Buddhist Holy Book

Buddhists revere many sacred texts and scriptures. Some of the most important are:

  • Tipitaka: These texts, known as the “three baskets,” are thought to be the earliest collection of Buddhist writings.
  • Sutras: There are more than 2,000 sutras, which are sacred teachings embraced mainly by Mahayana Buddhists.
  • The Book of the Dead: This Tibetan text describes the stages of death in detail.

Dalai Lama

The Dalai Lama and the history of Buddhism

David McNew/Getty Images

Nobel Laureate and exiled spiritual leader of Tibet, His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama, 2001.

The Dalai Lama is the leading monk in Tibetan Buddhism. Followers of the religion believe the Dalai Lama is a reincarnation of a past lama that has agreed to be born again to help humanity. There have been 14 Dalai Lamas throughout history.

The Dalai Lama also governed Tibet until the Chinese took control in 1959. The current Dalai Lama, Lhamo Thondup, was born in 1935.

Buddhist Holidays

Every year, Buddhists celebrate Vesak, a festival that commemorates Buddha’s birth, enlightenment and death.

During each quarter of the moon, followers of Buddhism participate in a ceremony called Uposatha. This observance allows Buddhists to renew their commitment to their teachings.

They also celebrate the Buddhist New Year and participate in several other yearly festivals.

Sources

Buddhism: An Introduction, PBS.
Buddhism, Ancient History Encyclopedia.
Buddhism: An Introduction, BBC.
The History of Buddha, History Cooperative.
Demographics of Buddhism, Georgetown University Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, & World Affairs.
Religions: Buddhism, BBC.
Buddhist Scriptures, Georgetown University Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, & World Affairs.
The Noble Eightfold Path: Tricycle.

Buddhism, religion and philosophy that developed from the teachings of the Buddha (Sanskrit: “Awakened One”), a teacher who lived in northern India between the mid-6th and mid-4th centuries bce (before the Common Era). Spreading from India to Central and Southeast Asia, China, Korea, and Japan, Buddhism has played a central role in the spiritual, cultural, and social life of Asia, and, beginning in the 20th century, it spread to the West.

Ancient Buddhist scripture and doctrine developed in several closely related literary languages of ancient India, especially in Pali and Sanskrit. In this article Pali and Sanskrit words that have gained currency in English are treated as English words and are rendered in the form in which they appear in English-language dictionaries. Exceptions occur in special circumstances—as, for example, in the case of the Sanskrit term dharma (Pali: dhamma), which has meanings that are not usually associated with the term dharma as it is often used in English. Pali forms are given in the sections on the core teachings of early Buddhism that are reconstructed primarily from Pali texts and in sections that deal with Buddhist traditions in which the primary sacred language is Pali. Sanskrit forms are given in the sections that deal with Buddhist traditions whose primary sacred language is Sanskrit and in other sections that deal with traditions whose primary sacred texts were translated from Sanskrit into a Central or East Asian language such as Tibetan or Chinese.

The foundations of Buddhism

The cultural context

Buddhism arose in northeastern India sometime between the late 6th century and the early 4th century bce, a period of great social change and intense religious activity. There is disagreement among scholars about the dates of the Buddha’s birth and death. Many modern scholars believe that the historical Buddha lived from about 563 to about 483 bce. Many others believe that he lived about 100 years later (from about 448 to 368 bce). At this time in India, there was much discontent with Brahmanic (Hindu high-caste) sacrifice and ritual. In northwestern India there were ascetics who tried to create a more personal and spiritual religious experience than that found in the Vedas (Hindu sacred scriptures). In the literature that grew out of this movement, the Upanishads, a new emphasis on renunciation and transcendental knowledge can be found. Northeastern India, which was less influenced by Vedic tradition, became the breeding ground of many new sects. Society in this area was troubled by the breakdown of tribal unity and the expansion of several petty kingdoms. Religiously, this was a time of doubt, turmoil, and experimentation.

A proto-Samkhya group (i.e., one based on the Samkhya school of Hinduism founded by Kapila) was already well established in the area. New sects abounded, including various skeptics (e.g., Sanjaya Belatthiputta), atomists (e.g., Pakudha Kaccayana), materialists (e.g., Ajita Kesakambali), and antinomians (i.e., those against rules or laws—e.g., Purana Kassapa). The most important sects to arise at the time of the Buddha, however, were the Ajivikas (Ajivakas), who emphasized the rule of fate (niyati), and the Jains, who stressed the need to free the soul from matter. Although the Jains, like the Buddhists, have often been regarded as atheists, their beliefs are actually more complicated. Unlike early Buddhists, both the Ajivikas and the Jains believed in the permanence of the elements that constitute the universe, as well as in the existence of the soul.

Buddha. Temple mural in Thailand of the Buddha founder of a major religions and philosophical system Buddhism.

Britannica Quiz

Buddha and Buddhism

Despite the bewildering variety of religious communities, many shared the same vocabulary—nirvana (transcendent freedom), atman (“self” or “soul”), yoga (“union”), karma (“causality”), Tathagata (“one who has come” or “one who has thus gone”), buddha (“enlightened one”), samsara (“eternal recurrence” or “becoming”), and dhamma (“rule” or “law”)—and most involved the practice of yoga. According to tradition, the Buddha himself was a yogi—that is, a miracle-working ascetic.

Buddhism, like many of the sects that developed in northeastern India at the time, was constituted by the presence of a charismatic teacher, by the teachings this leader promulgated, and by a community of adherents that was often made up of renunciant members and lay supporters. In the case of Buddhism, this pattern is reflected in the Triratna—i.e., the “Three Jewels” of Buddha (the teacher), dharma (the teaching), and sangha (the community).

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.
Subscribe Now

In the centuries following the founder’s death, Buddhism developed in two directions represented by two different groups. One was called the Hinayana (Sanskrit: “Lesser Vehicle”), a term given to it by its Buddhist opponents. This more conservative group, which included what is now called the Theravada (Pali: “Way of the Elders”) community, compiled versions of the Buddha’s teachings that had been preserved in collections called the Sutta Pitaka and the Vinaya Pitaka and retained them as normative. The other major group, which calls itself the Mahayana (Sanskrit: “Greater Vehicle”), recognized the authority of other teachings that, from the group’s point of view, made salvation available to a greater number of people. These supposedly more advanced teachings were expressed in sutras that the Buddha purportedly made available only to his more advanced disciples.

As Buddhism spread, it encountered new currents of thought and religion. In some Mahayana communities, for example, the strict law of karma (the belief that virtuous actions create pleasure in the future and nonvirtuous actions create pain) was modified to accommodate new emphases on the efficacy of ritual actions and devotional practices. During the second half of the 1st millennium ce, a third major Buddhist movement, Vajrayana (Sanskrit: “Diamond Vehicle”; also called Tantric, or Esoteric, Buddhism), developed in India. This movement was influenced by gnostic and magical currents pervasive at that time, and its aim was to obtain spiritual liberation and purity more speedily.

Despite these vicissitudes, Buddhism did not abandon its basic principles. Instead, they were reinterpreted, rethought, and reformulated in a process that led to the creation of a great body of literature. This literature includes the Pali Tipitaka (“Three Baskets”)—the Sutta Pitaka (“Basket of Discourse”), which contains the Buddha’s sermons; the Vinaya Pitaka (“Basket of Discipline”), which contains the rule governing the monastic order; and the Abhidhamma Pitaka (“Basket of Special [Further] Doctrine”), which contains doctrinal systematizations and summaries. These Pali texts have served as the basis for a long and very rich tradition of commentaries that were written and preserved by adherents of the Theravada community. The Mahayana and Vajrayana traditions have accepted as Buddhavachana (“the word of the Buddha”) many other sutras and tantras, along with extensive treatises and commentaries based on these texts. Consequently, from the first sermon of the Buddha at Sarnath to the most recent derivations, there is an indisputable continuity—a development or metamorphosis around a central nucleus—by virtue of which Buddhism is differentiated from other religions.

Giuseppe Tucci Joseph M. Kitagawa Frank E. Reynolds

: a religion of eastern and central Asia growing out of the teaching of Siddhārtha Gautama that suffering is inherent in life and that one can be liberated from it by cultivating wisdom, virtue, and concentration

Buddhist

noun or adjective

Example Sentences

Recent Examples on the Web

In front of a sea of men and women dressed mostly in white, Ambedkar converted himself from Hinduism to a new faith: Buddhism.


Sonia Paul, Wired, 1 Mar. 2022


These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word ‘Buddhism.’ Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.

Word History

First Known Use

1800, in the meaning defined above

Time Traveler

The first known use of Buddhism was
in 1800

Dictionary Entries Near Buddhism

Cite this Entry

“Buddhism.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Buddhism. Accessed 14 Apr. 2023.

Share

More from Merriam-Webster on Buddhism

Last Updated:
6 Apr 2023
— Updated example sentences

Subscribe to America’s largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Merriam-Webster unabridged

Buddhism is a non-theistic religion (no belief in a creator god), also considered a philosophy and a moral discipline, originating in India in the 6th and 5th centuries BCE. It was founded by the sage Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha l. c. 563 — c. 483 BCE) who, according to legend, had been a Hindu prince.

Before abandoning his position and wealth to become a spiritual ascetic, Siddhartha lived comfortably as a noble with his wife and family but once he became aware of human suffering he felt he had to find some way of easing people’s pain. He pursued strict spiritual disciplines to become an enlightened being who taught others the means by which they could escape samsara, the cycle of suffering, rebirth, and death.

The Buddha developed the belief system at a time when India was in the midst of significant religious and philosophical reform. Buddhism was, initially, only one of many schools of thought which developed in response to what was perceived as the failure of orthodox Hinduism to address the needs of the people. It remained a relatively minor school until the reign of Ashoka the Great (268-232 BCE) of the Mauryan Empire (322-185 BCE) who embraced and spread the belief, not only throughout India, but through Central and Southeast Asia.

YouTube
Follow us on YouTube!

Buddhism’s central vision can be summed up in four verses from one of its central sacred texts, the Dhammapada:

Our life is shaped by our mind; we become what we think. Suffering follows an evil thought as the wheels of a cart follow the oxen that draw it.

Our life is shaped by our mind; we become what we think. Joy follows a pure thought like a shadow that never leaves. (I.1-2)

From desire comes grief, from desire comes fear; one who is free from desire knows neither grief nor fear.

Attachment to objects of desire brings grief, attachment to objects of desire brings fear; one who is free of attachment knows neither grief nor fear. (XVI.212-213)

Love History?

Sign up for our free weekly email newsletter!

The Buddha came to understand that desire and attachment caused suffering and humans suffered because they were ignorant of the true nature of existence. People insisted on permanent states in life and resisted change, clung to what they knew, and mourned what they lost. In his quest for a means to live without suffering, he recognized that life is constant change, nothing is permanent, but one could find inner peace through a spiritual discipline that recognized beauty in the transience of life while also preventing one from becoming ensnared by attachment to impermanent objects, people, and situations. His teaching centers on the Four Noble Truths, the Wheel of Becoming, and the Eightfold Path to form the foundation of Buddhist thought and these remain central to the different schools of Buddhism which continue in the modern day.

Historical Background

Hinduism (Sanatan Dharma, “Eternal Order”) was the dominant faith in India in the 6th and 5th centuries BCE when a wave of religious and philosophical reform swept the land. Scholar John M. Koller notes how, “a major social transformation from agrarian life to urban trade and manufacture was underway, leading to a questioning of the old values, ideas, and institutions” (46). Hinduism was based on acceptance of the scriptures known as the Vedas, thought to be eternal emanations from the universe which had been “heard” by sages at a certain time in the past but were not created by human beings.

The Vedas were “received” and recited by the Hindu priests in Sanskrit, a language the people did not understand, and various philosophical thinkers of the time began to question this practice and the validity of the belief structure. Many different schools of philosophy are said to have developed at this time (most of which did not survive), which either accepted or rejected the authority of the Vedas. Those which accepted the orthodox Hindu view and the resulting practices were known as astika (“there exists”) and those which rejected the orthodox view were known as nastika (“there does not exist”). Three of the nastika schools of thought to survive this period were Charvaka, Jainism, and Buddhism.

The Buddha recognized that the paths of Charvaka & Jainism both represented extremes & found what he called a “middle way” between them.

Hinduism held the universe was governed by a supreme being known as Brahman who was the Universe itself and it was this being who had imparted the Vedas to humanity. The purpose of one’s life was to live in accordance with the divine order as it had been set down and perform one’s dharma (duty) with the proper karma (action) in order to eventually find release from the cycle of rebirth and death (samsara) at which point the individual soul would attain union with the oversoul (atman) and experience complete liberation and peace.

Charvaka rejected this belief and offered materialism instead. Its founder, Brhaspati (l. c. 600 BCE) claimed it was ridiculous for people to accept the word of Hindu priests that an incomprehensible language was the word of God. He established a school based on direct perception in ascertaining truth and the pursuit of pleasure as the highest goal in life. Mahavira (also known as Vardhamana, l. c. 599-527 BCE) preached Jainism based on the belief that individual discipline and strict adherence to a moral code led to a better life and release from samsara at death. The Buddha recognized that both of these paths represented extremes and found what he called a “middle way” between them.

Siddhartha Gautama

According to Buddhist tradition, Siddhartha Gautama was born in Lumbini (modern-day Nepal) and grew up, the son of a king. After a seer predicted he would either become a great king, or spiritual leader if he were to witness suffering or death, his father shielded from any of the harsh realities of existence. He married, had a son, and was groomed to succeed his father as king. One day, however (or, in some versions, over a succession of days), his coachman drove him out of the compound where he had spent his first 29 years and he encountered what are known as the Four Signs:

  • An aged man
  • A sick man
  • A dead man
  • An ascetic

With the first three, he asked his driver, “Am I, too, subject to this?”, and the coachman assured him that everyone aged, everyone grew sick at one point or another, and everyone died. Siddhartha became upset as he understood that everyone he loved, all his fine things, would be lost and that he, himself, would one day be as well.

Siddhartha Gautama, the Historical Buddha

Siddhartha Gautama, the Historical Buddha

Cristian Violatti (CC BY-NC-SA)

When he saw the ascetic, a shaven-headed man in a yellow robe, smiling by the side of the road, he asked why he was not like other men. The ascetic explained he was pursuing a peaceful life of reflection, compassion, and non-attachment. Shortly after this encounter, Siddhartha left his wealth, position, and family to follow the ascetic’s example.

He at first sought out a famous teacher from whom he learned meditation techniques, but these did not free him from worry or suffering. A second teacher taught him how to suppress his desires and suspend awareness, but this was no solution either as it was not a permanent state of mind. He tried to live as the other ascetics lived, practicing what was most likely Jain discipline, but even this was not enough for him. At last, he decided to refuse the needs of the body by starving himself, eating only a grain of rice a day, until he was so emaciated that he was unrecognizable.

According to one version of the legend, at this point, he either stumbled into a river and received a revelation of the middle way. In the other version of the story, a milkmaid named Sujata comes upon him in the woods near her village and offers him some rice milk, which he accepts, and so ends his period of strict asceticism as he glimpses the idea of a “middle way”. He goes and sits beneath a Bodhi tree, on a bed of grass, in the nearby village of Bodh Gaya, vowing he will either come to understand how best to live in the world or will die.

The Buddha understood, in a flash of illumination, that humans suffered because they insisted on permanence in a world of constant change.

He understood, in a flash of illumination, that humans suffered because they insisted on permanence in a world of constant change. People maintained an identity which they called their “self” and which would not change, maintained clothing and objects they thought of as “theirs”, and maintained relationships with others which they believed would last forever – but none of this was true; the nature of life, all of life, was change and the way to escape suffering was to recognize this and act on it. At this moment he became the Buddha (“awakened one” or “enlightened one”) and was freed from ignorance and illusion.

Having attained complete enlightenment, recognizing the interdependent and transient nature of all things, he recognized that he could now live however he pleased without suffering and could do whatever he wanted. He hesitated to teach what he had learned to others because he felt they would just reject him but was finally convinced that he had to try and so preached his first sermon at the Deer Park in Sarnath at which he first described the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path which led one from illusion and suffering to enlightenment and joy.

It should be noted that this story of the Buddha’s journey from illusion to awareness was later tailored to him following the establishment of the belief system and may, or may not, reflect the reality of Buddha’s early life and awakening. Scholars Robert E. Buswell, Jr. and Donald S. Lopez, Jr. note that early Buddhists were “motivated in part by the need to demonstrate that what the Buddha taught was not the innovation of an individual, but rather the rediscovery of a timeless truth” in order to give the belief system the same claim to ancient, divine origins held by Hinduism and Jainism (149). Buswell and Lopez continue:

Thus, in their biographies, all of the buddhas of the past and future are portrayed as doing many of the same things. They all sit cross-legged in their mother’s womb; they are all born in the “middle country” of the continent; immediately after their birth, they all take seven steps to the north; they all renounce the world after seeing the four sights and after the birth of a son; they all achieve enlightenment seated on a bed of grass. (149)

However this may be, the legend of Siddhartha’s journey and spiritual awakening became well known in oral tradition and was alluded to or included in written works from around 100 years after his death through the 3rd century CE when it appears in full in the Lalitavistara Sutra. The story has been repeated since and, lacking an alternative, is accepted as true by the majority of Buddhists.

Teachings & Beliefs

As noted, what started Siddhartha on his quest was the realization that he would lose everything that he loved, and this would cause him suffering. From this realization, he understood that life was suffering. One suffered at birth (as did one’s mother) and suffered then throughout one’s life by craving what one did not have, fearing for the loss of what one did have, mourning the loss of what one once had, and finally dying and losing everything only to be reincarnated to repeat the process.

Gandhara Relief of Buddha Eating with Monks

Gandhara Relief of Buddha Eating with Monks

Mark Cartwright (CC BY-NC-SA)

In order for life to be anything other than suffering, one had to find a way to live it without the desire to possess and hold it in a fixed form; one had to let go of the things of life while still being able to appreciate them for the value they had. After attaining enlightenment, he phrased his belief on the nature of life in his Four Noble Truths:

  • Life is suffering
  • The cause of suffering is craving
  • The end of suffering comes with an end to craving
  • There is a path which leads one away from craving and suffering

The four truths are called “noble” from the original arya meaning the same but also “worthy of respect” and suggesting “worth heeding”. The path alluded to in the fourth of the truths is The Eightfold Path which serves as a guide to live one’s life without the kind of attachment that guarantees suffering:

  • Right View
  • Right Intention
  • Right Speech
  • Right Action
  • Right Livelihood
  • Right Effort
  • Right Mindfulness
  • Right Concentration

As Koller points out, the first three have to do with wisdom, the next two with conduct, and the last three with mental discipline. He continues:

The Noble Eightfold Path should not be thought of as a set of eight sequential steps, with perfection at one step required before advancing to the next. Rather, these eight components of the path should be thought of as guiding norms of right living that should be followed more or less simultaneously, for the aim of the path is to achieve a completely integrated life of the highest order…Wisdom is seeing things as they really are, as interrelated and constantly changing processes…moral conduct is to purify one’s motives, speech, and action, thereby stopping the inflow of additional cravings…mental discipline works to attain insight and to eliminate the bad dispositions and habits built up on the basis of past ignorance and craving. (58)

By recognizing the Four Noble Truths and following the precepts of the Eightfold Path, one is freed from the Wheel of Becoming which is a symbolic illustration of existence. In the hub of the wheel sit ignorance, craving, and aversion which drive it. Between the hub and the rim of the wheel are six states of existence: human, animal, ghosts, demons, deities, and hell-beings. Along the rim of the wheel are depicted the conditions which cause suffering: birth, body-mind, consciousness, contact, feeling, thirst, grasping, volition, and so on.

By recognizing that these conditions cause suffering one can avoid it by disciplining one’s self through the Eightfold Path so that one is no longer driven by ignorance, craving, and aversion and is free of the wheel of samsara which binds one to continual rebirth, suffering, and death. In adhering to this discipline, one could live in one’s life but not be controlled and suffer by one’s attachment to the things of that life and, when one died, one was not reborn but attained the liberation of the spiritual state of nirvana. This, then, is the “middle way” Buddha found between slavish attachment to material goods and personal relationships and the extreme asceticism practiced by the Jains of his time.

Dharma Wheel

Dharma Wheel

saamiblog (CC BY)

He called his teachings the Dharma which, in this case, means “cosmic law” as opposed to Hinduism which defines the same term as “duty”. One could, however, interpret Buddha’s Dharma as “duty” in that he believed one had a duty to one’s self to take responsibility for one’s life, that each individual was finally responsible for how much they wanted to suffer – or not, and that everyone, finally, could be in control of their lives. He discounted a belief in a creator god as irrelevant to the lives of human beings and a contributor to suffering in that one cannot possibly know God’s will and believing that one can only leads to frustration, disappointment, and pain. No god is required in order to follow the Eightfold Path; all one needs is the commitment to taking full responsibility for one’s own actions and their consequences.

Schools & Practices

Buddha continued preaching his Dharma for the rest of his 80 years, finally dying at Kushinagar. He told his disciples that, after his death, they should have no leader and he did not want to be venerated in any way. He requested his remains be interred in a stupa and placed at a crossroads. This did not come to pass, however, since his followers had their own ideas, and so his remains were deposited in eight (or ten) stupas in different regions corresponding to important events in his life. They also chose a leader as they wished to continue his work and so, as humans do, held councils and debates and initiated rules and regulations.

At the First Council in c. 400 BCE, the core teachings and monastic discipline were decided upon and codified. At the Second Council in 383 BCE, a dispute over proscriptions in monastic discipline led to the first schism between the Sthaviravada school (which argued for observing said proscriptions) and the Mahasanghika school («Great Congregation») which represented the majority and rejected them. This schism would eventually result in the establishment of three different schools of thought:

  • Theravada Buddhism (The School of the Elders)
  • Mahayana Buddhism (The Great Vehicle)
  • Vajrayana Buddhism (The Way of the Diamond)

Theravada Buddhism (referred to as Hinayana “little vehicle” by Mahayana Buddhists, considered a pejorative term by the Theravada) claims to practice the belief as it was originally taught by Buddha. Adherents follow the teachings in the Pali language and focus on becoming an arhat (“saint”). This school is characterized by a focus on individual enlightenment.

Mahayana Buddhism (which includes Zen Buddhism) follows the teachings in Sanskrit and adherents work toward becoming a Bodhisattva (“essence of enlightenment”), one who, like Buddha, has attained full awareness but puts off the peace of nirvana in order to help others shed their ignorance. Mahayana Buddhism is the most popular form practiced today and also claims to follow the Buddha’s teachings faithfully.

The Spread of Buddhism

The Spread of Buddhism

Be Zen (CC BY-NC-SA)

Vajrayana Buddhism (also known as Tibetan Buddhism) dispenses with the concept of having to commit to Buddhist discipline and change one’s lifestyle in order to begin a Buddhist walk on the Eightfold Path. This school advocates the belief illustrated by the phrase Tat Tvam Asi (“thou art that”) that one already is a Bodhisattva, one only has to realize it. One need not, therefore, give up unhealthy attachments at the start of one’s walk but, rather, just proceed along the path and those attachments will become less and less alluring. As with the others, Vajrayana also claims it is the most faithful to the Buddha’s original vision.

All three schools adhere to the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, as do the many other minor schools, and none is objectively considered more legitimate than the others though, obviously, adherents of each would disagree.

Conclusion

Buddhism continued as a minor philosophical school of thought in India until the reign of Ashoka the Great who, after the Kalinga War (c. 260 BCE), renounced violence and embraced Buddhism. Ashoka spread the Dharma of the Buddha throughout India under the name dhamma which equates to “mercy, charity, truthfulness, and purity” (Keay, 95). He had the Buddha’s remains disinterred and reinterred in 84,000 stupas all through the country along with edicts encouraging the Buddhist vision. He also sent missionaries to other countries – Sri Lanka, China, Thailand, Greece among them – to spread Buddha’s message.

Buddhism became more popular in Sri Lanka and China than it had ever been in India and spread further from temples established in these countries. Buddhist art began appearing in both countries between the 2nd and 1st centuries BCE, including anthropomorphic depictions of Buddha himself. Earlier artists, during Ashoka’s time, had refrained from depicting Buddha and only suggested his presence through symbols but, increasingly, Buddhist sites included statues and images of him, a practice first initiated by a sect of the Mahasanghika school.

In time, these statues became objects of veneration. Buddhists do not “worship” the Buddha but, at the same time, they do in that the statue representing Buddha becomes not only a focal point for concentration on one’s own path to enlightenment but a way of expressing gratitude to the Buddha. Further, one who becomes a Buddha (and, according to Mahayana Buddhism, anyone can) does become a kind of “god” in that they have transcended the human condition and so deserve special recognition for that accomplishment. In the present day, there are over 500 million practicing Buddhists in the world, each following his or her own understanding of the Eightfold Path and continuing to spread the message that one only has to suffer in life as much as one wants to and there is a way which leads to peace.

This article has been reviewed for accuracy, reliability and adherence to academic standards prior to publication.

Fundamental principles of the Theravada doctrine

The teaching founded by the Buddha is known, in English, as Buddhism. It may be asked, who is the Buddha? A Buddha is one who has attained Bodhi; and by Bodhi is meant wisdom, an ideal state of intellectual and ethical perfection which can be achieved by man through purely human means. The term Buddha literally means enlightened one, a knower. Buddhists believe that a Buddha is born in each aeon of time, and our Buddha—the sage Gotama who attained enlightenment under the bo tree at Buddh Gaya in India—was the seventh in the succession.

Gotama was born the son of an Indian king on the border of modern Nepal 623 years before Christ. The wise men of the kingdom foresaw that he would become either an emperor or a Buddha, and his father, wanting him to be an emperor, kept him utterly secluded from all unpleasant things, so that he might not become wise by seeing life. But the gods knew that Gotama must become the Buddha, and so they visited earth in various forms to let him see them. On three successive days, while on his way to the royal park, Gotama saw an old man, a sick man, and a corpse, and thus he learned that men—all men—must suffer and die. On the fourth day he saw a monk; from this he understood that to learn the way of overcoming man’s universal sorrow he must give up worldly pleasures. Accordingly, in his twenty-ninth year, he renounced his kingdom and became an ascetic.

Gotama wandered about the countryside, a seeker after truth and peace. He approached many a distinguished teacher of his day, but none could give him what he sought. He strenuously practiced all the severe austerities of monkish life, hoping to attain Nirvana. Eventually his delicate body was reduced almost to a skeleton. But the more he tormented his body the further away he was from his goal. Realizing the futility of self-mortification, he finally decided to follow a different course, avoiding the extremes of pain and indulgence.

The new path which he discovered was the Middle Way, the Eightfold Path, which subsequently became part of his teaching. By following this path his wisdom grew into its fullest power, and he became the Buddha.

As a man Prince Gotama, by his own will, love, and wisdom, attained Buddhahood—the highest possible state of perfection—and he taught his followers to believe that they might do the same. Any man, within himself, possesses the power to make himself good, wise, and happy.

All the teachings of the Buddha can be summed up in one word: Dhamma. It means truth, that which really is. It also means law, the law which exists in a man’s own heart and mind. It is the principle of righteousness. Therefore the Buddha appeals to man to be noble, pure, and charitable not in order to please any Supreme Deity, but in order to be true to the highest in himself.

Dhamma, this law of righteousness, exists not only in a man’s heart and mind, it exists in the universe also. All the universe is an embodiment and revelation of Dhamma. When the moon rises and sets, the rains come, the crops grow, the seasons change, it, is because of Dhamma, for Dhamma is the law of the universe which makes matter act in the ways revealed by our studies of natural science.

If a man will live by Dhamma, he will escape misery and come to Nirvana, the final release from all suffering. It is not by any kind of prayer, nor by any ceremonies, nor by any appeal to a God, that a man will discover the Dhamma which will lead him to his goal. He will discover it in only one way—by developing his own character. This development comes only through control of the mind and purification of the emotions. Until a man stills the storm in his heart, until he extends his loving-kindness to all beings, he will not be able to take even the first step toward his goal.

Thus Buddhism is not a religion at all, in the sense in which the word is commonly understood. It is not a system of faith or worship. In Buddhism, there is no such thing as belief in a body of dogma which must be taken on faith, such as belief in a Supreme Being, a creator of the universe, the reality of an immortal soul, a personal savior, or archangels who are supposed to carry out the will of the Supreme Deity. Buddhism begins as a search for truth. The Buddha taught that we should believe only that which is true in the light of our own experience, that which conforms to reason and is conducive to the highest good and welfare of all beings. Men must rely on themselves. Even though he may «take refuge in Buddha,» the expression used when a man pledges himself to live a righteous life, he must not fall victim to a blind faith that the Buddha can save him. The Buddha can point out the path, but he cannot walk it for us.

The truth which the Buddhist sees when he looks around him is the truth of cause and effect. Every action, no matter how insignificant, produces an effect; every effect in its turn becomes a, cause and produces still further effects. It is meaningless to inquire for a First Cause. A First Cause is inconceivable; rather, cause and effect are cyclical, and this universe when it dies and falls apart will give rise to another universe, just as this one was formed from the dispersed matter of a previous universe. The origin of the universe, like that of every individual person or thing in it, is dependent on the chain of previous causes, which goes on and on in an endless cycle of birth, death, and rebirth. This is the principle of dependent origination.

What of the soul? The Buddha taught that there is no soul or self, and he used the metaphor of the cart. If you take away the wheels and axles, the floorboards and sides, the shafts, and all the other parts of the cart, what remains? Nothing but the conception of a cart, which will be the same when a new cart is built. So the uninterrupted process of psychophysical phenomena moves from life to life. Each life passes instantaneously in death to a new life, and the new life is the effect of the causes in the old life. A candle flame at this instant is different from the flame that burned an instant ago, yet the flame is continuous.

Thus in the chain of interdependent causation all phenomenal existence is constantly changing. The elements combine and recombine with no underlying substance, or soul, to give them permanence. This is the Wheel of Life. The main cause of the restlessness, the suffering, which is the lot of beings turning on the Wheel of Life, is craving or selfish desire for existence, and it is this desire which sets the life force in motion. Desire is manifested in action. This action is in reality volition or will power, which is responsible for the creation of being. It is called karma in Sanskrit, but in the Pali language, which the Buddha spoke and in which all the Buddhist scriptures were written, it is softened to kamma.

In this universe in which nothing is permanent all change is governed by kamma or the kammic force. Kamma means action. In its general sense, kamma means all good and bad actions. Kamma refers to all kinds of intentional actions whether mental, verbal, or physical, that is, all thoughts, words, and deeds. In its ultimate sense kamma means all moral and immoral volition.

Kamma, though it activates the chain of cause and effect, is not determinism, nor is it an excuse for fatalism. The past influences the present, but does not dominate it. The past is the background against which life goes on from moment to moment; the past and the present influence the future. Only the present moment exists, and the responsibility for using the present moment for good or ill lies with each individual.

Every action produces an effect; it is cause first and effect afterward. We therefore speak of kamma as “the law of cause and effect.» If you throw a stone into a pond, the ripples spread out to the shore, but that is not all, for the ripples return inward until they touch the stone again. The effects of our actions come back to us, and as long as our actions are done with evil intent, the waves of effect will come back to us as evil. But if we are kind and keep ourselves peaceful, the returning waves of trouble will grow weaker until they die down and our good kamma will come back to us in blessing.

In the world around us there are many inequalities in the lot of man—some are rich, others are poor, some live full lives, others die young, etc. According to Buddhism, the inequalities which exist are due, to some extent, to environment—which is itself shaped by cause and effect—and to a greater extent to causes, that is kamma, which are in the present, the immediate past, and the remote past. Man himself is responsible for his own happiness and misery. Thus kamma is not fate nor destiny nor blind determinism. Man has a certain amount of free will; he can modify his actions and affect his future. Each act, whether mental or physical, tends to produce its like. If a man does a good deed or thinks a good thought, the effect upon him is to increase the tendencies to goodness in him.

The understanding of kamma gives us power. The more we make the doctrine of kamma a part of our lives, the more power we gain, not only to direct our future, but also to help our fellow beings more effectively. The practice of good kamma, when fully developed, will enable us to overcome evil and even to overcome kamma itself, thus bringing us to our goal, Nirvana.

The principle of dependent origination and the law of kamma provide the background for understanding the nature of rebirth. According to Buddhism, death is «the temporary end of a temporary phenomenon.» It is not the complete annihilation of the being, for although the organic life has ceased, the kammic force which hitherto actuated it is not destroyed. Our physical forms are only the outward manifestations of the invisible kammic force. When the present form perishes, another form takes its place according to a good or bad volitional impulse—the kamma that was the most powerful—at the moment before death.

At death the kammic force remains entirely undisturbed by the disintegration of the physical body, and the passing away of the present consciousness creates the conditions for the coming into being of a fresh body in another birth. The stream of consciousness flows on like a river which is built up by its tributaries and dispenses its water to the countryside through which it passes. The continuity of flux at death is unbroken in point of time; there is no breach in the stream of consciousness, and therefore there is no room whatever for an intermediate stage between this life and the next. Rebirth takes place immediately.

The present being, present existence, is conditioned by the way one faced circumstances in the last and in all past existences. One’s present character and circumstances are the result of all that one has been up to the present, but what one will be in the future depends on what one does now in the present. The true Buddhist regards death as a momentary incident between one life and its successor and views its approach with calmness. His only concern is that his future should be such that the condition of that life may provide him with better opportunities for perfecting himself.

Buddhism teaches that with the practice of meditation and concentration the memory can be trained. By meditation and mind culture one can acquire the power to see one’s rebirth as a link, or a succession of links, in a chain of births; one can also acquire the power of looking back into one’s previous lives. Not only this, but Buddhism also teaches that with the attainment of Nirvana in this life itself, through enlightenment and true wisdom, one can reach the end of this chain of rebirths.

Nirvana, the state to which all Buddhists aspire, is the cessation of desire and hence the end of suffering. Nirvana in Sanskrit means «the blowing out.» It is understood as the extinguishment of the flame of personal desire, the quenching of the fire of life. Among Westerners Nirvana is often thought of as a negative state, a kind of «nothingness.» But in the Buddhist scriptures it is always described in positive terms; the highest refuge, safety, emancipation, peace, and the like. Nirvana is freedom, but not freedom from circumstance; it is freedom from the bonds with which we have bound ourselves to circumstance. That man is free who is strong enough to say, «Whatever comes I accept as best.»

Nirvana is the dying of the kammic force. The Buddhist ascends to Nirvana through many stages of the Middle Way, the path of wisdom, morality, and control. There is not space enough here even to mention these phases or the various aspects of the regimen recommended by the Buddha in his vast scriptures; but it may be taken for granted that the life of the conscientious Buddhist is full and rich. Through the cycle of rebirths he ascends, he perfects himself, he conquers his cravings through wisdom and love. Slowly the kammic force ebbs away, the flame dies down.

At the root of man’s trouble is his primal state of ignorance. From ignorance comes desire, which sets the kammic force in motion. Hence the way to Nirvana lies through knowledge, and we come again full circle to Dhamma, the Buddha’s teachings. For in Dhamma, as truth, lies release from ignorance and desire and perpetual change, and the Buddha has shown us the way to truth.

What, then, is the meaning of Buddhism? Ultimately Buddhism, although not strictly speaking a religion, is a systematic exercise in spirituality, certainly one of the greatest ever conceived. It offers the individual a means by which he may fulfill himself through understanding, reaching eventually the plane of the supraperson on which both the self and self-knowledge are no longer useful. Meister Eckhart, the great Christian mystic, said: «The kingdom of God is for none but the thoroughly dead.» The Buddhist would agree, though he would probably prefer a less grim way of saying it. Nirvana in life, the peace which «passeth all understanding,» is the conquest of life, the discovery of the permanent in its flux of psychophysical accidents and circumstances. The Buddhist believes that through meditation and good hard thought he can follow the Buddha through the successive stages of enlightenment and achieve at last the perfect wisdom which surmounts all need.

But by no means all Buddhists are monks or adepts. What does Buddhism mean for the ordinary person going about his work in the world? All through the Buddha’s teaching, repeated stress is laid on self-reliance and resolution. Buddhism makes man stand on his own feet, it arouses his self-confidence and energy. The Buddha again and again reminded his followers that there is no one, either in heaven or on earth, who can help them or free them from the results of their past evil deeds. The Buddhist knows that the powers of his own mind and spirit are enough to guide him in the present and shape his future and bring him eventually to the truth. He knows that he possesses a strength which is ultimately unsurpassable.

Moreover, Buddhism points unequivocally to the moral aspect of everyday life. Though Nirvana is amoral, in the sense that final peace transcends the conflict of good and evil, the path to wisdom is definitely a moral path. This follows logically from the doctrine of kamma. Every action must produce an effect, and one’s own actions produce an effect in one’s own life. Thus the kammic force which carries us inevitably onward can only be a force for good, that is, for our ultimate wisdom, if each action is a good action.

This doctrine finds its highest expression in metta, the Buddhist goal of universal and all-embracing love. Metta means much more than brotherly feeling or kindheartedness, though these are part of it. It is active benevolence, a love which is expressed and fulfilled in active ministry for the uplifting of fellow beings. Metta goes hand in hand with helpfulness and a willingness to forego self-interest in order to promote the welfare and happiness of mankind. It is metta which in Buddhism is the basis for social progress. Metta is, finally, the broadest and intensest conceivable degree of sympathy, expressed in the throes of suffering and change. The true Buddhist does his best to exercise metta toward every living being and identifies himself with all, making no distinctions whatsoever with regard to caste, color, class, or sex.

In addition, of course, the teachings of the Buddha are a prime cultural force in Oriental life, just as the Bible is the ultimate source of much Western art and thought. The Buddhist scriptures are larger and more detailed than the Christian Bible, however, and in translation would fill a dozen volumes. In Pali, the language of the scriptures, the Buddha’s teachings are called Tripitaka, which means «The Three Baskets.»

Vinaya Pitaka, «The Basket of Discipline,» consists of five books which expound the rules of monastic life. Sutta Pitaka, «The Basket of Discourses,» is a collection of discussions, stories, poems, and proverbs, written in simple language, imparting all the precepts of practical Buddhism. The third basket, Abhidhamma Pitaka, or «Basket of Ultimate Things,» deals with epistemological, metaphysical, and psychological matters and is of interest mainly to trained philosophers.

Thus the Tripitaka offers cohesive guidance at every level of intellectual, ethical, and spiritual activity. The Buddha’s word is light, a lamp for Burma—and for everyone.

Skip to content

One Mind Dharma Logo

What is Buddhism? A Brief Introduction

What is Buddhism? A Brief Introduction

(Last Updated On: March 21, 2019)

eq

What is Buddhism? A Brief Introduction

Buddhism is a rich tradition. With about 500 million Buddhists worldwide according to Pew Research Center, it is one of the world’s most popular religions. If the word religion throws you off in reference to Buddhism, you can read our post Is Buddhism a Religion?. We will also discuss this topic briefly below.

As there are many different types of Buddhism, it can be difficult to pinpoint Buddhism exactly and answer the question “What is Buddhism?” perfectly. However, there are core Buddhist teachings similar across traditions. We will dive into the teachings, the history, and the practices to understand what Buddhism is all about.[/text_output]ONLINE MINDFULNESS COURSE

Basic Facts about Buddhism

  • Began between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE
  • Started by Siddhartha Gautama, who later became known as the Buddha
  • Holidays include the Buddha’s birthday, the day of awakening, and lunar observances
  • Some traditions emphasize gods and deities, while others fall toward apatheism
  • Considered by most scholars to be a nontheistic religion
  • Hundreds of different Buddhist traditions across the world
  • Collection of texts or scriptures includes over 20,000 pages, not in a single book
  • Originated in what is today India
  • The Buddha was an awakened human, not a god

introduction to buddhism course

A Brief History of Buddhism

The word Buddhism is a relatively new term, first popping up in the 19th century. Many followers of the Buddha’s teachings use the word dharma, which can mean many things. In this case, it means the path or teachings. When the Buddha awakened, he taught a path to lead to awakening called dharma. You can learn more about the word dharma in our post What is Dharma?

Siddhartha Gautama lived sometime between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE in what is today India. Contrary to the common narrative, the Buddha was not a prince. His family was wealthy and he grew up with privilege. At 29 years old, the Buddha left the comfort of his village and life to pursue a deeper satisfaction.

After studying with various meditation teachers in different traditions of the time, the Buddha found what is today known as the Middle Way or Middle Path. This is at the core of the Buddha’s teachings, and is the idea that we must find balance in our practice.

After awakening, the Buddha taught about the path to enlightenment for the rest of his life. Upon his death, he left no clear successor. His monks memorized his teachings, eventually writing them down. Over the coming centuries, Buddhism spread across Southeast Asia and the world.

In the 20th century, Buddhism made it’s way into (more) mainstream Western culture. As it was brought over to the United Kingdom and the United States, only bits and pieces were carried over. Many of the traditional teachings and rituals were left, perhaps with the intention to make the path more palatable.

Because of this transmission, the dharma is often seen as a philosphy, way of life, or form of psychology even in the West. It is an integral inspiration of dialectical behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and many mindfulness-based therapies. Although there are traditional Buddhist temples in the West, many people practice a more secular form of Buddhism.

Buddhist Teachings

The teachings of the Buddha are vast, and vary from tradition to tradition. However, there are some core beliefs and teachings that are generally found in every tradition.

Basic Buddhist Beliefs

Karma and Rebirth

The Buddha taught extensively about rebirth and karma. In traditional Buddhist teachings the goal of practice is to escape the cycle of death and rebirth, known as samsara.

Karma may most simply be understood as the law of cause and effect. When we act, we create consequences. We can act to create liberation, or we can act and cause more suffering. According to the dharma, we must take action in order to espace the cycle of samsara completely.

This is a teaching that is often lost in Western Buddhist circles. The teaching of rebirth is left out, and some consider it to be a teaching rooted in the culture and time of the Buddha. Regardless, it is a core Buddhist belief and teaching and therefore worth mentioning!

buddhist beliefsSuffering and Liberation

The Buddha said, “I teach suffering and the cessation of suffering.” The word suffering comes from the Pali word dukkha, which may be understood as the dis-ease, discomfort, or lack of satisfaction we all experience in life.

The teaching of the Four Noble Truths is perhaps the most foundational teaching of the Buddha. It teaches that there is suffering, there is a cause to our suffering, there is cessation of suffering, and there is a path to cessation. That is, the Buddha outlines the problem, the cause of the problem, the fact that there is a solution, and how to achieve the solution.

Nirvana and the Path

Full awakening is known as nirvana. Nirvana is not a place or a state. Rather, it is the release of the suffering or dukkha. The Buddha himself achieved awakening, and taught others how to achieve the same liberation in the Fourth Noble Truth.

This solution is known as the Noble Eightfold Path. These are eight factors to be cultivated that lead to the end of suffering. This path really incorporates everything the Buddha taught, and lays a basic blueprint for ending dukkha.[vc_row inner_container=”true” padding_top=”0px” padding_bottom=”0px” bg_color=”#526984″ bg_video=”” class=”” style=””][vc_column fade_animation_offset=”45px” width=”1/1″][text_output]

Meditation in Buddhism

When people think of the Buddhist path, they often think of the practice of meditation. Although this is just one part of the path, it is one that is heavily stressed in the West. In secular traditions like MBSR, meditation is the majority of the practice and focus.

If you’re interested in learning more about Buddhist meditation, you can check out our Meditation for Beginners: The Complete Meditation Guide.

Mindfulness in Buddhism

Mindfulness meditation is one of the most well-known forms of meditation practice. Rooted in the Buddha’s teachings on establishing mindfulness, mindfulness is about establishing present-time awareness and recognition.

With mindfulness, we see what is arising and passing. We know what is leading to suffering and what is leading to liberation. A patience observance, mindfulness involves receiving what arises with equanimity and nonjudgement. There are many different ways to cultivate mindfulness (more on this below). As we observe mindfully, we begin to see the truth of reality and the human experience.

Concentration Meditation

Concentration is the practice of cultivating a collected and focused mind. Wise Concentration is one of the factors of the Noble Eightfold Path, and is an important practice. Without concentration, we cannot be mindful of what is arising as the mind grows distracted constantly. Deeper states of concentration lead to deep insight into the nature of experience.

The Heart Practices

The heart practices, or brahma-viharas, are four practices to cultivate an open and caring heart. These practices are metta (loving-kindness), karuna (compassion), mudita (appreciative joy), and upekkha (equanimity). These practices support our relationships with others, and the cultivation of both concentration and mindfulness.[/text_output][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row padding_top=”0px” padding_bottom=”0px”][vc_column fade_animation_offset=”45px” width=”1/1″][text_output]

buddhism godIs Buddhism a Religion?

Buddhism is often considered to be a way of life, a philosophy, or a simple set of teachings. This is because the Buddha did not stress the importance of a creator or God. The Buddha was not explicity atheistic. Instead, he was apatheistic. That is, he did not think this was an important matter to consider as it did not impact our awakening or liberation.

Although there is no central god in Buddhism, many traditions use prayer and homages to deities and bodhisattvas. Furthermore, the presence of extensive rituals and traditions are reminiscent of more traditional religions. Many scholars, sociologists, and anthropologists consider Buddhism to be one of the notheistic religions.

Because Buddhism does not stress the importance of a creator, many people find Buddhism to be an acceptable set of teachings to follow while also following other religious beliefs. At our meditation center in Northern California, we have members of the community who also practice Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Although some teachings may clash, individuals find what works for them to promote liberation and wellbeing.

Practicing Buddhism

The actual practice of Buddhism varies from country to country and tradition to tradition. The practices in Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism have many differences. The amount of different practices are impossible to count, but we will do our best to offer a simple introduction to Buddhist practices.

Ethics in Buddhism

buddhist ethicsEthics, or sila, is an important part of the Buddhist path. In many Buddhist countries, ethics are practiced for years before meditation training begins. The Buddha’s most simple teachings on ethics is that of the five precepts, or training rules. Undertaken by millions of laypeople, these precepts offer a foundation of ethical living. The five precepts are:

    1. To abstain from killing
    2. To abstain from taking that which is not freely offered
    3. To abstain from sexual misconduct
    4. To abstain from false speech
    5. To abstain from intoxicating drinks which may lead to heedlessness

To start practicing Buddhism, we need to lead an ethical life. If we cause harm left and right, meditation periods will be filled with guilt and pain. Living ethically is a form of creating wholesome karma, and helps us to deepen our investigation of ourselves.

“Abandon wrongdoing.
It can be done.
If there were no likelihood, I would not ask you to do it.
But since it is possible
and since it brings blessing and happiness,
I do ask of you:
abandon wrongdoing.

Cultivate doing good.
It can be done.
If it brought deprivation and sorrow, I would not ask you to do it.
But since it brings blessing and happiness,
I do ask of you:
cultivate doing good.”
-The Buddha (Anguttara Nikaya)

Meditation Practices

There are many different meditation practices in Buddhist traditions. The first, and most well-known is mindfulness. You can take our Mindfulness I course to begin practicing. It’s an online meditation course, and offers an introduction to mindfulness and the practices.

Mindfulness meditation may utilize the breath, the body, the mind, or anything else we experience. Included are practices like the body scan meditation, tuning into feeling tones, and looking at the mental reactions. Below is a basic mindfulness meditation you can try.

Another important meditation practice is concentration. In concentration meditation, we cultivate the ability to focus with our full attention. A form of samatha, or calming the mind, concentration helps us develop ease and deeper insight. Below is a basic concentration practice to try!

Finally, there are the heart practices. These are practices that help us to open the heart and respond with a tender caring. Instead of reacting strongly, we respond with gentleness or loving-kindness. We care for the wellbeing of ourselves and those around us. These practices can be beautiful, helping us to free the heart from hatred, resentment, and jealousy. You can check out our Meditation CD’s for a collection of practices working with the heart.

Enter your email address for a free week of guided meditations!

Studying Buddhism

Buddhism is not all about practice. We must study the Buddha’s teachings in order to lay a foundation of understanding. As we read, learn, and listen, practice is required. Understanding the foundations of the Buddhist path, we can reflect on the teachings and begin observing our own experience in meditation.

Studying is definitely not the only part of the path, and it doesn’t work if we don’t practice. However, taking the time to read some books about Buddhism can help us understand what is required to practice, how to practice, and what to look for as you begin following the dharma.

daily meditations

Buddhist Sangha

Finally, the Buddha stressed the importance of engaging with a sangha, or community. By practicing with a community, we support one another, learn from each other, and cultivate a collective awakening. Finding a local group or online group can be a powerful way to kickstart your Buddhist practice.

Enter your email address below to receive updates from our blog!

Please consider supporting One Mind Dharma by sharing this post via one of the buttons below![/text_output][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row padding_top=”0px” padding_bottom=”0px”][vc_column fade_animation_offset=”45px”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Matthew Sockolov is a Buddhist meditation teacher and author. He was empowered to teach meditation by Spirit Rock Meditation Center, and is the founding teacher of One Mind Dharma. His new book, Practicing Mindfulness — 75 Essential Meditations is now available on Amazon.

Approximately 2500 years ago, an affluent prince named Siddharth Gautama started to question his luxurious, influential life in his father’s palace. His retrospection led him to leave his palatial life in quest of the unknown. And, this quest led to what is now known as the fourth-largest religion in the world – Buddhism. At its core, Buddhism beliefs refuse us to worship God; instead, it preaches us to take ownership of our actions and our lives. 

With over 520 million followers, which is around 7% of the global population, Buddhism comprises a variety of beliefs, spiritual practices, and traditions that are majorly derived from the original teachings of the Buddha. Though religion is believed to have originated in India, its reach all across the world has led to several modifications in the practice. Countries such as Thailand, Myanmar, China, Tibet, and Cambodia follow Buddhism. In fact, for a lot of these countries, Buddhism happens to be their primary religion. 

Let us take a deeper look at what is Buddhism and what it teaches the humankind

The History of Buddhism & Buddhism Beliefs


Siddharth Gautama, the founder of Buddhism, was born in a royal family in present-day Lumbini, Nepal. He lived a happy married life and had a child until one day he stepped outside the comfort of his palace and came across an old man, a sick man, and a dead body. This led him to understand that despite his affluence and power, sickness, aging, and death were inevitable. 

During his journey outside the palace, he also came across a monk and took it as a sign that he should give up the comforts of his life and follow the footsteps of monk life. However, this life led him to experience even more of human suffering and misery. At this point, Siddhartha tried to live an extreme lifestyle of discipline and self-deprivation. He also practiced meditation. But, this wasn’t enough either.

After six years of leaving an eccentric life, he decided to find a ‘middle way’. He didn’t go back to his palatial life but he didn’t live in the extreme ascetic state as well. Finally, after meditating for years under the Bodhi Tree, also known as the tree of perfect knowledge, in Bodhgaya, he reached the state of enlightenment. This is what turned Siddhartha into the Buddha.

After his demise, Buddha’s disciples began preaching what they learned to the world and that is what laid the foundation of Buddhism. Over the next few centuries following this, Buddhist teaching began spreading across different parts of the world. And, while the philosophies and thoughts remained the same, the interpretations varied from one place to another. 

Buddhism Beliefs 101: Everything That You Need to Know

Buddhism Beliefs 101: Everything That You Need to Know

Like most major religions in the world, Buddhism is also based on many varied traditions. These traditions, however, share a mutual set of fundamental principles. One such critical principle followed by every branch of Buddhism is the concept of reincarnation. Reincarnation is also defined by some as the cycle of birth, life, death, and rebirth.

However, Buddhism states that reincarnation and rebirth aren’t the same. The religion claims that reincarnation is the reoccurrence of the same individual repeatedly, however, in rebirth, you may or may not be born again as the same entity. 

‘Buddhism basic beliefs’ or ‘Buddhism major beliefs’ or Buddhism main beliefs’ or ‘Buddhism core beliefs’ include ‘The Three Universal Truths’, ‘The Four Noble Truths’, and ‘The Eightfold Path’.

The Three Universal Truths

SUMMARY
Key beliefs of Buddhism has three main beliefs or truths – nothing is permanent, one needs to let go of possessions to be happy, and everything is related to one another. 

As per Buddhism beliefs, the three universal truths are:

  • Nothing is permanent in this life and everything is always changing
  • Because everything is always changing and is impermanent, a life based on holding on to possessions cannot be a happy life
  • For every event that happens, there will be another consequential event and whether it is good or bad will depend on the nature of the first event

Buddhists believe strongly in the law of Karma which states that every action that you take today will have an immediate or delayed effect in your life. And, whether the second event is pleasant or not will depend on how skillful or unskilful your intention behind the first event was.

Therefore, it states that we must take ownership of every action that we take because it has an effect on our lives as well as on those around us as well as the entire universe. 

The Three Universal Practices

SUMMARY
There are 3 practices associated with Buddhism Beliefs – Sila, which means morality and good conduct, Samadhi which means meditation, and Prajna which means wisdom.

Furthermore, religion follows three practices:

Sila

Sila means morality and good conduct. It is based on two fundamental principles i.e. the principle of equality and the principle of reciprocity. While the first fundamental teaches us to give equal weightage to every living being, the latter defines that we should treat people the way we would like for them to treat us. 

Samadhi

Samadhi refers to meditation and concentration. This practice states that proper concentration and meditation lead to mental development which is the ultimate path to wisdom. It also helps in strengthening control over our mind and remain in good conduct.

Prajna

Prajana implies wisdom, enlightenment, and discernment. The beating heart of Buddhism, this practice explains that wisdom will only exist if your mind is calm and pure. And, only such a mind can lead you on the path of enlightenment.

NOTE
The principle of reciprocity is prevalent in almost all the major religions in the world. In Christianity, it is considered as the ‘Golden Rule’ and is defined as “to do unto others as you would wish them to do unto you”.

The Four Noble Truths

SUMMARY
There are four noble truths of Buddhism. Dukkha means suffering is universal to human life. Samudaya means that the main of suffering is attachment.

Nirodha means that man can end suffering if he frees himself from attachments. Magga means that one needs to follow the eightfold path to end suffering.

Buddha preaches that there are four noble truths that explore the aspects of human suffering. They are:

Dukkha

In simple terms, Dukkha means suffering or that suffering is universal to human life. There can be various causes behind the suffering – loss, sickness, pain, poverty, failure, and the impermanent nature of pleasure. Irrespective of the cause, suffering is inevitable. 

Samudaya

The Buddhism belief of Samudaya talks about the main cause of suffering i.e. attachment. The true nature of humans that include the need to possess and control things is what leads us to suffer. Suffering can be in several forms – the desire to be rich and famous, jealousy or anger towards something or someone, craving of sensual gratifications. 

Nirodha

The concept of Nirodha says that there can be an end to the suffering. By liberating ourselves from attachments, we can rid ourselves of our sufferings. Once you learn to let go of your desires and cravings, the mind experiences non-attachment and complete liberation. This is what leads us to Nirvana. 

Magga

The final truth out of the Four Noble Truths, Magga explains that to end the suffering and break away from our attachments, we must follow the eightfold path. 

The Eightfold Path

SUMMARY
Samma Vaca, teaches us to abstain from lies. Samma Kammanta talks about your actions. Also, Samma Ajva means making our livelihood through appropriate means. Samma Vayama focuses on preventing unwholesome states of mind.

Samma Sati means being conscientiously aware of the activities of our mind. Samadhi or mental disciple is the right concentration. Samma Dankappa signifies detachment. Samma Ditti refers to understanding things as they are.

We talked about the three essential elements of Buddhism above, namely Sila, Samadhi, and Prajna above. Interestingly, the noble eightfold path is categorized under these three elements. 

Before we dig deeper into the paths, let us divide them as per the three elements.

Sila or Ethical Conduct comprises three aspects of the eightfold path – Right Speech, Right Action, and Right Livelihood.

Samadhi or Mental Discipline includes three other factors of the eightfold path – Right effort, Right mindfulness, and Right concentration.

And, finally, the third element, Prajana constitute the remaining two paths i.e. Right Thought and Right Understanding. 

Let us now take a detailed look at the eightfold path that leads us on the path to Nirvana, as defined by Buddha.

Right Speech (Samma Vaca) 

Right Speech, or Samma Vaca, is the Buddhism belief that teaches us to abstain from lies, backbiting and slandering that may bring disharmony and hatred, harsh, rude and abusive language, and gossip and idle babble. The path states that when we restrict ourselves from all these forms of speech, we are left with nothing but the truth.

And, hence, what we speak is polite, benevolent, useful, and gentle. We must weigh our words and speak them only when it is necessary. And, if we have nothing to say, we must observe the ‘noble silence’.

Right action (Samma Kammanta)

Samma Kammanta talks about your actions. It teaches us to refrain from any action that may cause harm or damage to others and the nature around us. Destroying life such as plants and animals, stealing, making dishonest collaborations, and indulging in illegitimate sexual intercourse are some of the negative actions that this path teaches us to stay away from. 

Right livelihood (Samma Ajiva) 

Simply put, the Buddhism belief of right livelihood mentions that we should withhold ourselves from making our livelihood through inappropriate means. War, arms and ammunition, intoxication, killing animals, working a dishonorable profession, and cheating are some of the actions that we must learn to avoid.

It also mentions that we should help others around us to lead the same honorable and responsible way of life. 

Right effort (Samma Vayama)

Samma Vayama encompasses four basic learnings – to prevent unwholesome states of mind from arising, to abandon unwholesome states that have already arisen, to produce or arouse the wholesome states of mind that are yet to arise and to nurture and perfect the wholesome state of mind that is already present within us. 

Right mindfulness (Samma Sati)

Right mindfulness refers to being conscientiously aware of the activities of our mind, the activities of our body, our feelings and sensations, and our ideas, conceptions, thoughts, and things (dhamma).

The practice of controlled breathing, also known as meditation, is a well-known exercise that connects the body to improve our mental development.

Right concentration (Samma Samadhi)

The final factor of Samadhi or mental disciple is the right concentration that ultimately takes us to the four stages of Dhyana, also known as ‘trance’. In the first stage of this Buddhism belief, you get rid of unwholesome thoughts such as lust, worry, skepticism, and restlessness; instead, you embrace happiness and joy as well as certain mental activities.

In the second stage, you learn to suppress all intellectual activities, develop one-pointedness and tranquillity, and continue to retain happiness. In the third stage, the active sensation of joy also disappears while happiness and mindful equanimity still remain. And, lastly, in the fourth stage, all of your sensations, including happiness disappears, except pure equanimity and awareness. 

Right thought (Samma Dankappa)

Samma Dankappa, or Right thought, is the part of Prajana or Wisdom. This signifies detachment, non-violence, selfless renunciation, and love. Interestingly, love, non-violence, and detachment have been grouped under wisdom which goes to show that true wisdom can only be obtained with these noble traits and anything opposite leads to lack of wisdom in all spheres of your life – individually, socially, as well as politically.

Right understanding (Samma Ditthi)

The eighth and the final path in the noble eightfold path is Right Understanding or Samma Ditti. This refers to understanding things as they are and that can be defined purely by the four noble truths. This understanding of the four noble truths is regarded as the ultimate reality, the highest wisdom. 

Buddhism differentiates understanding in two categories – one is anubodh or ‘knowing accordingly’ which only refers to grasping of knowledge based on the date given to us, and the other is pativedha or ‘penetration’  which means seeing things in their truest form and nature without having to label them. Pativedha is only possible when the mind is pure and completely developed through meditation and concentration.

The Five Precepts of Buddhism


SUMMARY
The five precepts of Buddhism are – to not kill another being, to not lie, to not steal, to not conduct any sexual misadventures, and to not consume alcohol or drugs.

Now that we have spoken about the various aspects of Buddhism beliefs, it is important that we learn about the five essential moral guidelines that must be followed in daily life to live a life on the path to enlightenment. These are:

1. Do not kill 

This Buddhism belief can also be translated to non-violence or not harming. The accompanying virtue to this precept is compassion and kindness. It is directly congruent with the human right to life.

This precept prevents one from taking the life of sentient life, whether it be a fly or a bigger animal. However, it should be noted that there are some qualifiers to this. An accidental injury to another being does not violate this precept. How seriously this precept should be taken is also dependent on the size of the being, intelligence, and spiritual status of the being. 

For instance, killing a big animal is more serious than a small animal, killing a human is more serious than an animal, and killing a spiritual monk is more serious than killing a normal human being. However, at the end of it all, all types of killings are condemned.

This precept also condemns concepts like capital punishment. Suicide is also seen as a forbidden behavior under this precept, along with abortion. This is because Buddhism states that all life starts at conception.

This is the most important precept in Buddhism. The positive virtue that goes along with this precept is the vow to protect other living beings. Certain qualities like respect for the life of others, empathy, sympathy are based on this precept. This concept is the underlying foundation of all Buddhist behavior.

2. Do not steal 

This can be loosely translated to acquiring things by way of fraud and cheating. The accompanying virtue to this precept is renunciation and generosity. It is directly congruent with the human right to property. 

This precept is focused on stealing what one knows does not belong to oneself. How severe the theft is dependent on the value of the owner of what has been stolen, and the value of the thing that has been stolen. 

Forgery, bribing, cheating, fraud – all these activities violate this precept. A positive and opposite aspect of this precept is the protection of the property of other people.

3. Do not lie 

This refers to the hiding of truth as well as indulging or creating gossip or back-biting others. The accompanying virtue to this precept is being honest and dependable. It is directly congruent with the human right to human dignity.

Lying in this context does not extend to spoken word, it also involves lying via actions. It also includes wrong forms of speech, such as harsh words, gossip, and malicious words. If the lie has an ulterior motive behind it, it is considered an even more serious violation of this precept, compared to, for example, a white lie. The virtues that are congruent with this precept include being honest and dependable in one’s work and personal lives, truthfulness towards others, and loyalty to one’s superiors. 

This is the second most important precept in Buddhist literature because it is considered that a person who can lie has no shame, and is, therefore, capable of many kinds of wrongdoings. This precept says that one must avoid any kind of untruthfulness, not only because it can harm others, but also because it goes against the Buddhist principle of finding the truth.

4. Live a decent life 

This would also include prohibiting the misuse of sexual encounters and indulging in adultery. For monks and nuns, complete celibacy is imperative. The accompanying virtue to this precept is contentment and respect for faithfulness. It is directly congruent with the human right to fidelity in marriage.

This precept basically forbids one from any kind of sexual misconduct. Sexual misconduct may include adultery, sleeping with a person one knows is married, engaged, or otherwise committed, rape, incest, etc. This precept focuses on preventing greed for oneself and harm towards others. The violation of this precept is more serious if the person being cheated is a good person. 

It primarily involves being content with one’s partner and recognizing and respecting the sanctity of one’s marriage.

5. Do not take drugs or consume alcohol 

This includes any form of intoxication that can cloud the mind and your judgment. The accompanying virtue to this precept is mindfulness and responsibility. It is directly congruent with the human right to security and safety.

This precept focuses on being more aware and mindful of one’s surroundings. Drugs and alcohol can come in the way of that. Buddhism also states that while other precepts may or may not be violated depending on the caveats and situations, this precept is always more blamable because it prevents from understanding the teachings of Buddha and can ultimately lead to madness. 

Buddhist texts have described alcohol as a doorway to idleness and laxity. It can add to quarrels, negative feelings and states of mind, and can also damage one’s intelligence. Therefore, Buddhism prohibits alcohol consumption. 

NOTE
While everyone should practice these five moral following, the religion further states some additional guidelines for those who are preparing themselves to live a hermetic life.

This includes refraining from dancing, singing, and music of grotesque nature, eating untimely meals, using high seats, using personal adornments including perfume and garland, and accepting valuables such as gold and silver.

3 Different Types of Buddhism


As mentioned, with time, Buddhism beliefs gained prevalence all around the world, but majorly in Asia. These gave birth to three schools of thought that shared many similarities but were also distinct in some aspects. 

1. Theravada Buddhism

SUMMARY
This type of Buddhism is based on the belief that Buddha was a man, not God. It teaches us that only by practicing the eightfold path can we achieve nirvana.

The most popular and followed Buddhism belief, Theravada, or Hinayana is the oldest kind that is known to preserve and follow the teachings of Gautama Buddha as mentioned in the Pāli Canon. The followers of this kind, also known as the Theravādins, are more conservative in their beliefs. They base their practices on the belief, as claimed by the Buddha, that he wasn’t a God; he was just a man. 

Literally meaning ‘the Doctrine of elders’, Theravada Buddhism has been a predominant religion in countries like Thailand, Myanmar, and Sri Lanka. The practice has also gained a major reputation in the west, particularly in the US, Europe, and Australia. Also, popular as ‘Southern Buddhism’ in contrast with ‘Northern Buddhism’ that is followed in Korea, Japan, Tibet, and China, the key teachings of Theravada Buddhism revolved around the framework of the Four Noble Truths and the eightfold path. 

As per the texts of Pāli Canon, the Buddha teaches that the practice of the ‘Middle’ is what brings us to nirvana and that it could only be reached if you practice the eightfold path.

2. Mahayana Buddhism

SUMMARY
This type of Buddhism believes that many Buddhas have walked on this Earth and that nirvana is attainable only by monks.

While there is little to be said about the origin of Mahayana Buddhism, this branch of Buddhism follows the path of Bodhisattva or the path to enlightenment. Contrary to the beliefs of Theravada Buddhism, Mahayana doesn’t believe in the concept of Buddha being unique; instead, it believes that he was only one of the many Buddhas to have walked the face of the earth.

Additionally, while both the branches believe in and follow the four noble truths, the eightfold path, and the Middle Way, Theravada states that nirvana is only attainable by monks and Mahayana claims that it can be attained by anybody who follows the path to enlightenment with mindfulness and right concentration. 

3. Vajrayana Buddhism

SUMMARY
This Buddhism belief emphasizes on magic and the occult. It includes hand movements, postural changes, and sacred chanting as a way to channel the mystical energy around us.

There are two different mindsets for the third school of Buddhism. Some claim that Vajrayana Buddhism is an entirely different branch while others consider it to be an extension or an offshoot of Mahayana Buddhism with a lot of emphasis on magic and the occult. Vajrayana Buddhism is known to have added tantra practices to Mahayana. 

According to the beliefs of Vajrayana, tantras are a collection of sacred texts which layout a secret methodology to fast-forward our journey towards nirvana. Some of these special methodologies include mudras (hand movements) that are believed to channel mythical energies, certain postures of the body (known as yoga to the world), and pious mantras (sacred chanting) that bear mystical power when recited repeatedly. 

Another important aspect of Vajrayana Buddhism is the ‘Mandala’ – a significant circular diagram that denoted spiritual connections and cosmic spaces. It is believed that by deep, intense meditation rituals over the mandala, you can reach an out-of-the-body experience.

NOTE
Another form of Buddhism that is mainly prevalent in Tibet is Tibetan Buddhism. Also observed in certain parts of northern India as well as China, this branch is considered to be derived from the newest stages of Mahayana Buddhism, meaning the tantra practices of Vajrayana Buddhism.

This form of Buddhism also believes in the cycle of rebirth and suffering – samsara, and highlights practices that allow us to break away from the vicious circle and attain nirvana. 

Buddhism Quotes 

1. “You only lose what you cling to.”


 “You only lose what you cling to.”

2. “Teach this triple truth to all: A generous heart, kind speech, and a life of service and compassion are the things which renew humanity.”

“Teach this triple truth to all: A generous heart, kind speech, and a life of service and compassion are the things which renew humanity.”

3. “To abstain from lying is essentially wholesome.”

“To abstain from lying is essentially wholesome.”

4. “Anger will never disappear so long as thoughts of resentment are cherished in the mind. Anger will disappear just as soon as thoughts of resentment are forgotten.”

“Anger will never disappear so long as thoughts of resentment are cherished in the mind. Anger will disappear just as soon as thoughts of resentment are forgotten.”

5. “For soon the body is discarded, Then what does it feel? A useless log of wood, it lies on the ground, Then what does it know? Your worst enemy cannot harm you As much as your own thoughts, unguarded. But once mastered, No one can help you as much, Not even your father or your mother.”

 “For soon the body is discarded, Then what does it feel? A useless log of wood, it lies on the ground, Then what does it know? Your worst enemy cannot harm you As much as your own thoughts, unguarded. But once mastered, No one can help you as much, Not even your father or your mother.”

6. “To conquer oneself is a greater task than conquering others.”

“To conquer oneself is a greater task than conquering others.”

7. “However many holy words you read, However many you speak, What good will they do you If you do not act upon them?”

“However many holy words you read, However many you speak, What good will they do you If you do not act upon them?”

8. “Work out your own salvation. Do not depend on others.”

“Work out your own salvation. Do not depend on others.”

9. “You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger.”

“You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger.”

10. “There is nothing more dreadful than the habit of doubt. Doubt separates people. It is a poison that disintegrates friendships and breaks up pleasant relations. Indeed. it is a thorn that irritates and hurts; it is a sword that kills.”

“There is nothing more dreadful than the habit of doubt. Doubt separates people. It is a poison that disintegrates friendships and breaks up pleasant relations. Indeed. it is a thorn that irritates and hurts; it is a sword that kills.”

Final Thoughts

Irrespective of the various schools of thought, the core values, and principles of Buddhism teach us to live a peaceful, selfless life filled with love and affection towards all human beings. It also teaches us ethical and moral guidelines that help us bring joy and happiness in our lives and prevent any kind of suffering due to indulgence in any negative aspects.

Buddha and Buddhism lay huge importance in the Middle Way as the path to enlightenment. It doesn’t teach us to worship a God or to have blind faith. Instead, it talks about taking ownership of our actions and making informed decisions.

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Is broadening a word
  • Is bro a word
  • Is brittle a word
  • Is bringing a base word
  • Is breakfasts a word