On x86/x64 processors, a byte is 8 bits, and there are 256 possible binary states in 8 bits, 0 thru 255. This is how the OS translates your keyboard key strokes into letters on the screen. When you press the ‘A‘ key, the keyboard sends a binary signal equal to the number 97 to the computer, and the computer prints a lowercase ‘a‘ on the screen. You can confirm this in any Windows text editing software by holding an ALT key, typing 97 on the NUMPAD, then releasing the ALT key. If you replace ’97’ with any number from 0 to 255, you will see the character associated with that number on the system’s character code page printed on the screen.
If a character is 8 bits, or 1 byte, then a WORD must be at least 2 characters, so 16 bits or 2 bytes. Traditionally, you might think of a word as a varying number of characters, but in a computer, everything that is calculable is based on static rules. Besides, a computer doesn’t know what letters and symbols are, it only knows how to count numbers. So, in computer language, if a WORD is equal to 2 characters, then a double-word, or DWORD, is 2 WORDs, which is the same as 4 characters or bytes, which is equal to 32 bits. Furthermore, a quad-word, or QWORD, is 2 DWORDs, same as 4 WORDs, 8 characters, or 64 bits.
Note that these terms are limited in function to the Windows API for developers, but may appear in other circumstances (eg. the Linux dd command uses numerical suffixes to compound byte and block sizes, where c is 1 byte and w is bytes).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In computing, a word is the natural unit of data used by a particular processor design. A word is a fixed-sized datum handled as a unit by the instruction set or the hardware of the processor. The number of bits or digits[a] in a word (the word size, word width, or word length) is an important characteristic of any specific processor design or computer architecture.
The size of a word is reflected in many aspects of a computer’s structure and operation; the majority of the registers in a processor are usually word-sized and the largest datum that can be transferred to and from the working memory in a single operation is a word in many (not all) architectures. The largest possible address size, used to designate a location in memory, is typically a hardware word (here, «hardware word» means the full-sized natural word of the processor, as opposed to any other definition used).
Documentation for older computers with fixed word size commonly states memory sizes in words rather than bytes or characters. The documentation sometimes uses metric prefixes correctly, sometimes with rounding, e.g., 65 kilowords (KW) meaning for 65536 words, and sometimes uses them incorrectly, with kilowords (KW) meaning 1024 words (210) and megawords (MW) meaning 1,048,576 words (220). With standardization on 8-bit bytes and byte addressability, stating memory sizes in bytes, kilobytes, and megabytes with powers of 1024 rather than 1000 has become the norm, although there is some use of the IEC binary prefixes.
Several of the earliest computers (and a few modern as well) use binary-coded decimal rather than plain binary, typically having a word size of 10 or 12 decimal digits, and some early decimal computers have no fixed word length at all. Early binary systems tended to use word lengths that were some multiple of 6-bits, with the 36-bit word being especially common on mainframe computers. The introduction of ASCII led to the move to systems with word lengths that were a multiple of 8-bits, with 16-bit machines being popular in the 1970s before the move to modern processors with 32 or 64 bits.[1] Special-purpose designs like digital signal processors, may have any word length from 4 to 80 bits.[1]
The size of a word can sometimes differ from the expected due to backward compatibility with earlier computers. If multiple compatible variations or a family of processors share a common architecture and instruction set but differ in their word sizes, their documentation and software may become notationally complex to accommodate the difference (see Size families below).
Uses of words[edit]
Depending on how a computer is organized, word-size units may be used for:
- Fixed-point numbers
- Holders for fixed point, usually integer, numerical values may be available in one or in several different sizes, but one of the sizes available will almost always be the word. The other sizes, if any, are likely to be multiples or fractions of the word size. The smaller sizes are normally used only for efficient use of memory; when loaded into the processor, their values usually go into a larger, word sized holder.
- Floating-point numbers
- Holders for floating-point numerical values are typically either a word or a multiple of a word.
- Addresses
- Holders for memory addresses must be of a size capable of expressing the needed range of values but not be excessively large, so often the size used is the word though it can also be a multiple or fraction of the word size.
- Registers
- Processor registers are designed with a size appropriate for the type of data they hold, e.g. integers, floating-point numbers, or addresses. Many computer architectures use general-purpose registers that are capable of storing data in multiple representations.
- Memory–processor transfer
- When the processor reads from the memory subsystem into a register or writes a register’s value to memory, the amount of data transferred is often a word. Historically, this amount of bits which could be transferred in one cycle was also called a catena in some environments (such as the Bull GAMMA 60 [fr]).[2][3] In simple memory subsystems, the word is transferred over the memory data bus, which typically has a width of a word or half-word. In memory subsystems that use caches, the word-sized transfer is the one between the processor and the first level of cache; at lower levels of the memory hierarchy larger transfers (which are a multiple of the word size) are normally used.
- Unit of address resolution
- In a given architecture, successive address values designate successive units of memory; this unit is the unit of address resolution. In most computers, the unit is either a character (e.g. a byte) or a word. (A few computers have used bit resolution.) If the unit is a word, then a larger amount of memory can be accessed using an address of a given size at the cost of added complexity to access individual characters. On the other hand, if the unit is a byte, then individual characters can be addressed (i.e. selected during the memory operation).
- Instructions
- Machine instructions are normally the size of the architecture’s word, such as in RISC architectures, or a multiple of the «char» size that is a fraction of it. This is a natural choice since instructions and data usually share the same memory subsystem. In Harvard architectures the word sizes of instructions and data need not be related, as instructions and data are stored in different memories; for example, the processor in the 1ESS electronic telephone switch has 37-bit instructions and 23-bit data words.
Word size choice[edit]
When a computer architecture is designed, the choice of a word size is of substantial importance. There are design considerations which encourage particular bit-group sizes for particular uses (e.g. for addresses), and these considerations point to different sizes for different uses. However, considerations of economy in design strongly push for one size, or a very few sizes related by multiples or fractions (submultiples) to a primary size. That preferred size becomes the word size of the architecture.
Character size was in the past (pre-variable-sized character encoding) one of the influences on unit of address resolution and the choice of word size. Before the mid-1960s, characters were most often stored in six bits; this allowed no more than 64 characters, so the alphabet was limited to upper case. Since it is efficient in time and space to have the word size be a multiple of the character size, word sizes in this period were usually multiples of 6 bits (in binary machines). A common choice then was the 36-bit word, which is also a good size for the numeric properties of a floating point format.
After the introduction of the IBM System/360 design, which uses eight-bit characters and supports lower-case letters, the standard size of a character (or more accurately, a byte) becomes eight bits. Word sizes thereafter are naturally multiples of eight bits, with 16, 32, and 64 bits being commonly used.
Variable-word architectures[edit]
Early machine designs included some that used what is often termed a variable word length. In this type of organization, an operand has no fixed length. Depending on the machine and the instruction, the length might be denoted by a count field, by a delimiting character, or by an additional bit called, e.g., flag, or word mark. Such machines often use binary-coded decimal in 4-bit digits, or in 6-bit characters, for numbers. This class of machines includes the IBM 702, IBM 705, IBM 7080, IBM 7010, UNIVAC 1050, IBM 1401, IBM 1620, and RCA 301.
Most of these machines work on one unit of memory at a time and since each instruction or datum is several units long, each instruction takes several cycles just to access memory. These machines are often quite slow because of this. For example, instruction fetches on an IBM 1620 Model I take 8 cycles (160 μs) just to read the 12 digits of the instruction (the Model II reduced this to 6 cycles, or 4 cycles if the instruction did not need both address fields). Instruction execution takes a variable number of cycles, depending on the size of the operands.
Word, bit and byte addressing[edit]
The memory model of an architecture is strongly influenced by the word size. In particular, the resolution of a memory address, that is, the smallest unit that can be designated by an address, has often been chosen to be the word. In this approach, the word-addressable machine approach, address values which differ by one designate adjacent memory words. This is natural in machines which deal almost always in word (or multiple-word) units, and has the advantage of allowing instructions to use minimally sized fields to contain addresses, which can permit a smaller instruction size or a larger variety of instructions.
When byte processing is to be a significant part of the workload, it is usually more advantageous to use the byte, rather than the word, as the unit of address resolution. Address values which differ by one designate adjacent bytes in memory. This allows an arbitrary character within a character string to be addressed straightforwardly. A word can still be addressed, but the address to be used requires a few more bits than the word-resolution alternative. The word size needs to be an integer multiple of the character size in this organization. This addressing approach was used in the IBM 360, and has been the most common approach in machines designed since then.
When the workload involves processing fields of different sizes, it can be advantageous to address to the bit. Machines with bit addressing may have some instructions that use a programmer-defined byte size and other instructions that operate on fixed data sizes. As an example, on the IBM 7030[4] («Stretch»), a floating point instruction can only address words while an integer arithmetic instruction can specify a field length of 1-64 bits, a byte size of 1-8 bits and an accumulator offset of 0-127 bits.
In a byte-addressable machine with storage-to-storage (SS) instructions, there are typically move instructions to copy one or multiple bytes from one arbitrary location to another. In a byte-oriented (byte-addressable) machine without SS instructions, moving a single byte from one arbitrary location to another is typically:
- LOAD the source byte
- STORE the result back in the target byte
Individual bytes can be accessed on a word-oriented machine in one of two ways. Bytes can be manipulated by a combination of shift and mask operations in registers. Moving a single byte from one arbitrary location to another may require the equivalent of the following:
- LOAD the word containing the source byte
- SHIFT the source word to align the desired byte to the correct position in the target word
- AND the source word with a mask to zero out all but the desired bits
- LOAD the word containing the target byte
- AND the target word with a mask to zero out the target byte
- OR the registers containing the source and target words to insert the source byte
- STORE the result back in the target location
Alternatively many word-oriented machines implement byte operations with instructions using special byte pointers in registers or memory. For example, the PDP-10 byte pointer contained the size of the byte in bits (allowing different-sized bytes to be accessed), the bit position of the byte within the word, and the word address of the data. Instructions could automatically adjust the pointer to the next byte on, for example, load and deposit (store) operations.
Powers of two[edit]
Different amounts of memory are used to store data values with different degrees of precision. The commonly used sizes are usually a power of two multiple of the unit of address resolution (byte or word). Converting the index of an item in an array into the memory address offset of the item then requires only a shift operation rather than a multiplication. In some cases this relationship can also avoid the use of division operations. As a result, most modern computer designs have word sizes (and other operand sizes) that are a power of two times the size of a byte.
Size families[edit]
As computer designs have grown more complex, the central importance of a single word size to an architecture has decreased. Although more capable hardware can use a wider variety of sizes of data, market forces exert pressure to maintain backward compatibility while extending processor capability. As a result, what might have been the central word size in a fresh design has to coexist as an alternative size to the original word size in a backward compatible design. The original word size remains available in future designs, forming the basis of a size family.
In the mid-1970s, DEC designed the VAX to be a 32-bit successor of the 16-bit PDP-11. They used word for a 16-bit quantity, while longword referred to a 32-bit quantity; this terminology is the same as the terminology used for the PDP-11. This was in contrast to earlier machines, where the natural unit of addressing memory would be called a word, while a quantity that is one half a word would be called a halfword. In fitting with this scheme, a VAX quadword is 64 bits. They continued this 16-bit word/32-bit longword/64-bit quadword terminology with the 64-bit Alpha.
Another example is the x86 family, of which processors of three different word lengths (16-bit, later 32- and 64-bit) have been released, while word continues to designate a 16-bit quantity. As software is routinely ported from one word-length to the next, some APIs and documentation define or refer to an older (and thus shorter) word-length than the full word length on the CPU that software may be compiled for. Also, similar to how bytes are used for small numbers in many programs, a shorter word (16 or 32 bits) may be used in contexts where the range of a wider word is not needed (especially where this can save considerable stack space or cache memory space). For example, Microsoft’s Windows API maintains the programming language definition of WORD as 16 bits, despite the fact that the API may be used on a 32- or 64-bit x86 processor, where the standard word size would be 32 or 64 bits, respectively. Data structures containing such different sized words refer to them as:
- WORD (16 bits/2 bytes)
- DWORD (32 bits/4 bytes)
- QWORD (64 bits/8 bytes)
A similar phenomenon has developed in Intel’s x86 assembly language – because of the support for various sizes (and backward compatibility) in the instruction set, some instruction mnemonics carry «d» or «q» identifiers denoting «double-«, «quad-» or «double-quad-«, which are in terms of the architecture’s original 16-bit word size.
An example with a different word size is the IBM System/360 family. In the System/360 architecture, System/370 architecture and System/390 architecture, there are 8-bit bytes, 16-bit halfwords, 32-bit words and 64-bit doublewords. The z/Architecture, which is the 64-bit member of that architecture family, continues to refer to 16-bit halfwords, 32-bit words, and 64-bit doublewords, and additionally features 128-bit quadwords.
In general, new processors must use the same data word lengths and virtual address widths as an older processor to have binary compatibility with that older processor.
Often carefully written source code – written with source-code compatibility and software portability in mind – can be recompiled to run on a variety of processors, even ones with different data word lengths or different address widths or both.
Table of word sizes[edit]
| key: bit: bits, c: characters, d: decimal digits, w: word size of architecture, n: variable size, wm: Word mark | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Computer architecture |
Word size w | Integer sizes |
Floatingpoint sizes |
Instruction sizes |
Unit of address resolution |
Char size |
| 1837 | Babbage Analytical engine |
50 d | w | — | Five different cards were used for different functions, exact size of cards not known. | w | — |
| 1941 | Zuse Z3 | 22 bit | — | w | 8 bit | w | — |
| 1942 | ABC | 50 bit | w | — | — | — | — |
| 1944 | Harvard Mark I | 23 d | w | — | 24 bit | — | — |
| 1946 (1948) {1953} |
ENIAC (w/Panel #16[5]) {w/Panel #26[6]} |
10 d | w, 2w (w) {w} |
— | — (2 d, 4 d, 6 d, 8 d) {2 d, 4 d, 6 d, 8 d} |
— — {w} |
— |
| 1948 | Manchester Baby | 32 bit | w | — | w | w | — |
| 1951 | UNIVAC I | 12 d | w | — | 1⁄2w | w | 1 d |
| 1952 | IAS machine | 40 bit | w | — | 1⁄2w | w | 5 bit |
| 1952 | Fast Universal Digital Computer M-2 | 34 bit | w? | w | 34 bit = 4-bit opcode plus 3×10 bit address | 10 bit | — |
| 1952 | IBM 701 | 36 bit | 1⁄2w, w | — | 1⁄2w | 1⁄2w, w | 6 bit |
| 1952 | UNIVAC 60 | n d | 1 d, … 10 d | — | — | — | 2 d, 3 d |
| 1952 | ARRA I | 30 bit | w | — | w | w | 5 bit |
| 1953 | IBM 702 | n c | 0 c, … 511 c | — | 5 c | c | 6 bit |
| 1953 | UNIVAC 120 | n d | 1 d, … 10 d | — | — | — | 2 d, 3 d |
| 1953 | ARRA II | 30 bit | w | 2w | 1⁄2w | w | 5 bit |
| 1954 (1955) |
IBM 650 (w/IBM 653) |
10 d | w | — (w) |
w | w | 2 d |
| 1954 | IBM 704 | 36 bit | w | w | w | w | 6 bit |
| 1954 | IBM 705 | n c | 0 c, … 255 c | — | 5 c | c | 6 bit |
| 1954 | IBM NORC | 16 d | w | w, 2w | w | w | — |
| 1956 | IBM 305 | n d | 1 d, … 100 d | — | 10 d | d | 1 d |
| 1956 | ARMAC | 34 bit | w | w | 1⁄2w | w | 5 bit, 6 bit |
| 1956 | LGP-30 | 31 bit | w | — | 16 bit | w | 6 bit |
| 1957 | Autonetics Recomp I | 40 bit | w, 79 bit, 8 d, 15 d | — | 1⁄2w | 1⁄2w, w | 5 bit |
| 1958 | UNIVAC II | 12 d | w | — | 1⁄2w | w | 1 d |
| 1958 | SAGE | 32 bit | 1⁄2w | — | w | w | 6 bit |
| 1958 | Autonetics Recomp II | 40 bit | w, 79 bit, 8 d, 15 d | 2w | 1⁄2w | 1⁄2w, w | 5 bit |
| 1958 | Setun | 6 trit (~9.5 bits)[b] | up to 6 tryte | up to 3 trytes | 4 trit? | ||
| 1958 | Electrologica X1 | 27 bit | w | 2w | w | w | 5 bit, 6 bit |
| 1959 | IBM 1401 | n c | 1 c, … | — | 1 c, 2 c, 4 c, 5 c, 7 c, 8 c | c | 6 bit + wm |
| 1959 (TBD) |
IBM 1620 | n d | 2 d, … | — (4 d, … 102 d) |
12 d | d | 2 d |
| 1960 | LARC | 12 d | w, 2w | w, 2w | w | w | 2 d |
| 1960 | CDC 1604 | 48 bit | w | w | 1⁄2w | w | 6 bit |
| 1960 | IBM 1410 | n c | 1 c, … | — | 1 c, 2 c, 6 c, 7 c, 11 c, 12 c | c | 6 bit + wm |
| 1960 | IBM 7070 | 10 d[c] | w, 1-9 d | w | w | w, d | 2 d |
| 1960 | PDP-1 | 18 bit | w | — | w | w | 6 bit |
| 1960 | Elliott 803 | 39 bit | |||||
| 1961 | IBM 7030 (Stretch) |
64 bit | 1 bit, … 64 bit, 1 d, … 16 d |
w | 1⁄2w, w | bit (integer), 1⁄2w (branch), w (float) |
1 bit, … 8 bit |
| 1961 | IBM 7080 | n c | 0 c, … 255 c | — | 5 c | c | 6 bit |
| 1962 | GE-6xx | 36 bit | w, 2 w | w, 2 w, 80 bit | w | w | 6 bit, 9 bit |
| 1962 | UNIVAC III | 25 bit | w, 2w, 3w, 4w, 6 d, 12 d | — | w | w | 6 bit |
| 1962 | Autonetics D-17B Minuteman I Guidance Computer |
27 bit | 11 bit, 24 bit | — | 24 bit | w | — |
| 1962 | UNIVAC 1107 | 36 bit | 1⁄6w, 1⁄3w, 1⁄2w, w | w | w | w | 6 bit |
| 1962 | IBM 7010 | n c | 1 c, … | — | 1 c, 2 c, 6 c, 7 c, 11 c, 12 c | c | 6 b + wm |
| 1962 | IBM 7094 | 36 bit | w | w, 2w | w | w | 6 bit |
| 1962 | SDS 9 Series | 24 bit | w | 2w | w | w | |
| 1963 (1966) |
Apollo Guidance Computer | 15 bit | w | — | w, 2w | w | — |
| 1963 | Saturn Launch Vehicle Digital Computer | 26 bit | w | — | 13 bit | w | — |
| 1964/1966 | PDP-6/PDP-10 | 36 bit | w | w, 2 w | w | w | 6 bit 7 bit (typical) 9 bit |
| 1964 | Titan | 48 bit | w | w | w | w | w |
| 1964 | CDC 6600 | 60 bit | w | w | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w | w | 6 bit |
| 1964 | Autonetics D-37C Minuteman II Guidance Computer |
27 bit | 11 bit, 24 bit | — | 24 bit | w | 4 bit, 5 bit |
| 1965 | Gemini Guidance Computer | 39 bit | 26 bit | — | 13 bit | 13 bit, 26 | —bit |
| 1965 | IBM 1130 | 16 bit | w, 2w | 2w, 3w | w, 2w | w | 8 bit |
| 1965 | IBM System/360 | 32 bit | 1⁄2w, w, 1 d, … 16 d |
w, 2w | 1⁄2w, w, 11⁄2w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1965 | UNIVAC 1108 | 36 bit | 1⁄6w, 1⁄4w, 1⁄3w, 1⁄2w, w, 2w | w, 2w | w | w | 6 bit, 9 bit |
| 1965 | PDP-8 | 12 bit | w | — | w | w | 8 bit |
| 1965 | Electrologica X8 | 27 bit | w | 2w | w | w | 6 bit, 7 bit |
| 1966 | SDS Sigma 7 | 32 bit | 1⁄2w, w | w, 2w | w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1969 | Four-Phase Systems AL1 | 8 bit | w | — | ? | ? | ? |
| 1970 | MP944 | 20 bit | w | — | ? | ? | ? |
| 1970 | PDP-11 | 16 bit | w | 2w, 4w | w, 2w, 3w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1971 | CDC STAR-100 | 64 bit | 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | bit | 8 bit |
| 1971 | TMS1802NC | 4 bit | w | — | ? | ? | — |
| 1971 | Intel 4004 | 4 bit | w, d | — | 2w, 4w | w | — |
| 1972 | Intel 8008 | 8 bit | w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w | w | 8 bit |
| 1972 | Calcomp 900 | 9 bit | w | — | w, 2w | w | 8 bit |
| 1974 | Intel 8080 | 8 bit | w, 2w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w | w | 8 bit |
| 1975 | ILLIAC IV | 64 bit | w | w, 1⁄2w | w | w | — |
| 1975 | Motorola 6800 | 8 bit | w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w | w | 8 bit |
| 1975 | MOS Tech. 6501 MOS Tech. 6502 |
8 bit | w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w | w | 8 bit |
| 1976 | Cray-1 | 64 bit | 24 bit, w | w | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w | w | 8 bit |
| 1976 | Zilog Z80 | 8 bit | w, 2w, 2 d | — | w, 2w, 3w, 4w, 5w | w | 8 bit |
| 1978 (1980) |
16-bit x86 (Intel 8086) (w/floating point: Intel 8087) |
16 bit | 1⁄2w, w, 2 d | — (2w, 4w, 5w, 17 d) |
1⁄2w, w, … 7w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1978 | VAX | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w, 1 d, … 31 d, 1 bit, … 32 bit | w, 2w | 1⁄4w, … 141⁄4w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1979 (1984) |
Motorola 68000 series (w/floating point) |
32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w, 2 d | — (w, 2w, 21⁄2w) |
1⁄2w, w, … 71⁄2w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1985 | IA-32 (Intel 80386) (w/floating point) | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | — (w, 2w, 80 bit) |
8 bit, … 120 bit 1⁄4w … 33⁄4w |
8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1985 | ARMv1 | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, w | — | w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1985 | MIPS I | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | w, 2w | w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1991 | Cray C90 | 64 bit | 32 bit, w | w | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, 48 bit | w | 8 bit |
| 1992 | Alpha | 64 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1992 | PowerPC | 32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | w, 2w | w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 1996 | ARMv4 (w/Thumb) |
32 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | — | w (1⁄2w, w) |
8 bit | 8 bit |
| 2000 | IBM z/Architecture (w/vector facility) |
64 bit | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w 1 d, … 31 d |
1⁄2w, w, 2w | 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, 3⁄4w | 8 bit | 8 bit, UTF-16, UTF-32 |
| 2001 | IA-64 | 64 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | 41 bit (in 128-bit bundles)[7] | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 2001 | ARMv6 (w/VFP) |
32 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄2w, w | — (w, 2w) |
1⁄2w, w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 2003 | x86-64 | 64 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w, 80 bit | 8 bit, … 120 bit | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| 2013 | ARMv8-A and ARMv9-A | 64 bit | 8 bit, 1⁄4w, 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w, w | 1⁄2w | 8 bit | 8 bit |
| Year | Computer architecture |
Word size w | Integer sizes |
Floatingpoint sizes |
Instruction sizes |
Unit of address resolution |
Char size |
| key: bit: bits, d: decimal digits, w: word size of architecture, n: variable size |
[8][9]
See also[edit]
- Integer (computer science)
Notes[edit]
- ^ Many early computers were decimal, and a few were ternary
- ^ The bit equivalent is computed by taking the amount of information entropy provided by the trit, which is
. This gives an equivalent of about 9.51 bits for 6 trits.
- ^ Three-state sign
References[edit]
- ^ a b Beebe, Nelson H. F. (2017-08-22). «Chapter I. Integer arithmetic». The Mathematical-Function Computation Handbook — Programming Using the MathCW Portable Software Library (1 ed.). Salt Lake City, UT, USA: Springer International Publishing AG. p. 970. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64110-2. ISBN 978-3-319-64109-6. LCCN 2017947446. S2CID 30244721.
- ^ Dreyfus, Phillippe (1958-05-08) [1958-05-06]. Written at Los Angeles, California, USA. System design of the Gamma 60 (PDF). Western Joint Computer Conference: Contrasts in Computers. ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 130–133. IRE-ACM-AIEE ’58 (Western). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-04-03. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
[…] Internal data code is used: Quantitative (numerical) data are coded in a 4-bit decimal code; qualitative (alpha-numerical) data are coded in a 6-bit alphanumerical code. The internal instruction code means that the instructions are coded in straight binary code.
As to the internal information length, the information quantum is called a «catena,» and it is composed of 24 bits representing either 6 decimal digits, or 4 alphanumerical characters. This quantum must contain a multiple of 4 and 6 bits to represent a whole number of decimal or alphanumeric characters. Twenty-four bits was found to be a good compromise between the minimum 12 bits, which would lead to a too-low transfer flow from a parallel readout core memory, and 36 bits or more, which was judged as too large an information quantum. The catena is to be considered as the equivalent of a character in variable word length machines, but it cannot be called so, as it may contain several characters. It is transferred in series to and from the main memory.
Not wanting to call a «quantum» a word, or a set of characters a letter, (a word is a word, and a quantum is something else), a new word was made, and it was called a «catena.» It is an English word and exists in Webster’s although it does not in French. Webster’s definition of the word catena is, «a connected series;» therefore, a 24-bit information item. The word catena will be used hereafter.
The internal code, therefore, has been defined. Now what are the external data codes? These depend primarily upon the information handling device involved. The Gamma 60 [fr] is designed to handle information relevant to any binary coded structure. Thus an 80-column punched card is considered as a 960-bit information item; 12 rows multiplied by 80 columns equals 960 possible punches; is stored as an exact image in 960 magnetic cores of the main memory with 2 card columns occupying one catena. […] - ^ Blaauw, Gerrit Anne; Brooks, Jr., Frederick Phillips; Buchholz, Werner (1962). «4: Natural Data Units» (PDF). In Buchholz, Werner (ed.). Planning a Computer System – Project Stretch. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. / The Maple Press Company, York, PA. pp. 39–40. LCCN 61-10466. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-04-03. Retrieved 2017-04-03.
[…] Terms used here to describe the structure imposed by the machine design, in addition to bit, are listed below.
Byte denotes a group of bits used to encode a character, or the number of bits transmitted in parallel to and from input-output units. A term other than character is used here because a given character may be represented in different applications by more than one code, and different codes may use different numbers of bits (i.e., different byte sizes). In input-output transmission the grouping of bits may be completely arbitrary and have no relation to actual characters. (The term is coined from bite, but respelled to avoid accidental mutation to bit.)
A word consists of the number of data bits transmitted in parallel from or to memory in one memory cycle. Word size is thus defined as a structural property of the memory. (The term catena was coined for this purpose by the designers of the Bull GAMMA 60 [fr] computer.)
Block refers to the number of words transmitted to or from an input-output unit in response to a single input-output instruction. Block size is a structural property of an input-output unit; it may have been fixed by the design or left to be varied by the program. […] - ^ «Format» (PDF). Reference Manual 7030 Data Processing System (PDF). IBM. August 1961. pp. 50–57. Retrieved 2021-12-15.
- ^ Clippinger, Richard F. [in German] (1948-09-29). «A Logical Coding System Applied to the ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer)». Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, US: Ballistic Research Laboratories. Report No. 673; Project No. TB3-0007 of the Research and Development Division, Ordnance Department. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Clippinger, Richard F. [in German] (1948-09-29). «A Logical Coding System Applied to the ENIAC». Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, US: Ballistic Research Laboratories. Section VIII: Modified ENIAC. Retrieved 2017-04-05.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ «4. Instruction Formats» (PDF). Intel Itanium Architecture Software Developer’s Manual. Vol. 3: Intel Itanium Instruction Set Reference. p. 3:293. Retrieved 2022-04-25.
Three instructions are grouped together into 128-bit sized and aligned containers called bundles. Each bundle contains three 41-bit instruction slots and a 5-bit template field.
- ^ Blaauw, Gerrit Anne; Brooks, Jr., Frederick Phillips (1997). Computer Architecture: Concepts and Evolution (1 ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-10557-8. (1213 pages) (NB. This is a single-volume edition. This work was also available in a two-volume version.)
- ^ Ralston, Anthony; Reilly, Edwin D. (1993). Encyclopedia of Computer Science (3rd ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold. ISBN 0-442-27679-6.
Subjects>Jobs & Education>Education
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Best Answer
Copy
A word typically refers to a 16-bit quantity, where 32-bits is
called a longword.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
This answer is:
Study guides
Add your answer:
Earn +
20
pts
Q: How many bits in a word?
Write your answer…
Submit
Still have questions?
Related questions
People also asked
The world has known many languages; some 7,000 are currently spoken. And we use language to inform others. So, are some languages better than others when it comes to how fast we convey information?
A group of intrepid linguists set out to find out.
How many bits per syllable?
Their thinking was simple: words are, basically, bits of information. Some languages have many syllables; some few. Some are spoken slowly; others fast. Does that make some languages more efficient than others? For example, linguistic differences between Japanese and English lead to a ratio of 1:11 in their number of distinct syllables.
Simply put, English speakers will use 11 times more syllables than Japanese ones to convey the same meaning. Wouldn’t it make sense that Japanese would be 11 times more efficient in conveying information?
Strangely enough, no. The researchers found that information is conveyed at an information rate (IR) of about 39 bits per second. So common is that rate that they theorize that this phenomenon is rooted in the human neurocognitive capacity: our brains can’t process verbal information any faster than that.
For those who are not tech-savvy, a bit is the smallest information that can be conveyed and can only have a value of 0 or 1. The very first modems, developed in 1959, had a transfer rate of 110 bits per second (bps); almost three times faster than language. A typical modem today can reach 100 Mbps–a whopping one hundred million bits.
Clearly, language is a sloooow way of transferring information…
The study
During the study, the researchers studied a sample of 17 languages from 9 language families spread across Europe and Asia. These showed a remarkable diversity in terms of linguistic and typological features at all levels, from phonetics and phonology to morphology and syntax and to semantics and pragmatics.
Focusing on their phonetics and phonology, these languages vary significantly:
- In their number of phonemes: from 25 in Japanese and Spanish to more than 40 in English and Thai),
- the number of distinct syllables: from a few hundred in Japanese to almost 7000 in English
- tonal complexity: from none to six contrastive tones
- and various other phonological phenomena: e.g., vowel harmony is present in Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, and Turkish
Thanks to its size and diversity, this sample was deemed adequate to extrapolate to human language in general.
Slow down!
The researchers also noticed that the number of syllables differed greatly between languages. For example, English has almost 7,000 syllables while Japanese only has 643; almost ten times fewer.
They then measured how much information each syllable can carry, depending on the language. Would each Japanese syllable carry ten times more information?
Strangely enough, the answer is no. The range was from five bits per syllable (Basque) to just eight (Vietnamese).
People make up for this by talking faster in languages with many syllables and slower in languages with few ones. While the Italians talk at a staggering nine syllables per second, Germans barely manage five. A language with great information density cannot be spoken fast and vice versa.
Their conclusion? No language is more efficient in transferring information than the rest. And the reason seems to be our brain’s limitation in absorbing information at a faster rate than a rather slow 40 bits per second…
Read more about this fascinating insight into the inner working of the human brain on ScienceMag.org. Or continue reading about the most common words used in multiple languages.
Asked by: Cassandre Sawayn
Score: 5/5
(6 votes)
half word = 16 bits. single word = 32 bits. double word = 64 bits.
How many bytes is a Halfword?
A halfword is 2 consecutive bytes. A fullword is 4 consecutive bytes. A doubleword is 8 consecutive bytes.
How many bits are in a word?
A byte is eight bits, a word is 2 bytes (16 bits), a doubleword is 4 bytes (32 bits), and a quadword is 8 bytes (64 bits).
What are 16 bits called?
BYTE — 8 bits, unsigned. WORD — 16 bits, unsigned. DWORD — 32 bits, unsigned.
How many bits is 2 WORDs?
So, in computer language, if a WORD is equal to 2 characters, then a double-word, or DWORD, is 2 WORDs, which is the same as 4 characters or bytes, which is equal to 32 bits.
40 related questions found
How many bits is a letter?
Computer manufacturers agreed to use one code called the ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange). ASCII is an 8-bit code. That is, it uses eight bits to represent a letter or a punctuation mark. Eight bits are called a byte.
How many bits make up a nibble?
In computing, a nibble (occasionally nybble or nyble to match the spelling of byte) is a four-bit aggregation, or half an octet. It is also known as half-byte or tetrade.
What is 64 bit called?
Alternatively referred to as WOW64 and x64, 64-bit is a CPU architecture that is capable of transferring 64-bits of data per clock cycle. It is an improvement over previous 32-bit processors. The number «64» represents the size of the basic unit of data the CPU can process.
What is 16bit compiler?
16 bit compilers compile the program into 16-bit machine code that will run on a computer with a 16-bit processor. 16-bit machine code will run on a 32-bit processor, but 32-bit machine code will not run on a 16-bit processor. 32-bit machine code is usually faster than 16-bit machine code.
Is a byte always 8 bits?
So, in most cases, a byte will generally be 8 bits. If not, it’s probably 9 bits, and may or may not be part of a 36-bit word. Note that the term byte is not well-defined without context. As far as computer architectures are concerned, you can assume that a byte is 8-bit, at least for modern architectures.
What is meant by 8-bit?
1. 8-bit is an early computer hardware device or software program that is capable of transferring eight bits of data at the same time. … When referring to a video card or graphics card, 8-bit refers to the amount of colors capable of being displayed. For example, 8-bit is the same as 256 colors.
What is meant by 8-bit data?
8-bit is a measure of computer information generally used to refer to hardware and software in an era where computers were only able to store and process a maximum of 8 bits per data block.
How many characters can 8 bits represent?
Character sets used today in the US are generally 8-bit sets with 256 different characters, effectively doubling the ASCII set. One bit can have 2 possible states. 21=2.
What is meant by a bit?
A bit (short for binary digit) is the smallest unit of data in a computer. A bit has a single binary value, either 0 or 1. … Half a byte (four bits) is called a nibble. In some systems, the term octet is used for an eight-bit unit instead of byte.
What does the meaning of word halfword and byte in ARM processor *?
The processor indicates the size of a transfer by use of the MAS[1:0] signal as described in MAS[1:0].
How much bits are in a byte?
Since one byte is made up of eight bits, this difference can be significant.
What is a 16-bit system?
16-bit is a computer hardware device or software program capable of transferring 16 bits of data at a time. For example, early computer processors (e.g., 8088 and 80286) were 16-bit processors, meaning they were capable of working with 16-bit binary numbers (decimal number up to 65,535).
Are 16-bit registers?
In computer architecture, 16-bit integers, memory addresses, or other data units are those that are 16 bits (2 octets) wide. Also, 16-bit CPU and ALU architectures are those that are based on registers, address buses, or data buses of that size.
What is 16bit pixel art?
8-bit graphics refers to the capability of every pixel to use 8 bits for storing the amount of colors that can be displayed. In a nutshell, 8-bit graphics refers to maximum 256 colors that can be displayed, whereas 16 bit means 65,536 colors and 34 bit means 16,777,215 colors.
Why do they call it x86?
The term «x86» came into being because the names of several successors to Intel’s 8086 processor end in «86», including the 80186, 80286, 80386 and 80486 processors. Many additions and extensions have been added to the x86 instruction set over the years, almost consistently with full backward compatibility.
Are there 128 bit computers?
While there are currently no mainstream general-purpose processors built to operate on 128-bit integers or addresses, a number of processors do have specialized ways to operate on 128-bit chunks of data.
Is my computer 32 or 64?
Click Start, type system in the search box, and then click System Information in the Programs list. When System Summary is selected in the navigation pane, the operating system is displayed as follows: For a 64-bit version operating system: X64-based PC appears for the System Type under Item.
What is high and low nibble?
Nibble is half a byte (0-15, or one hex digit). Low nibble are the bits 0-3; high nibble are bits 4-7.
How many kilobytes go into a Gigabyte?
Gigabyte (GB)
1,024 megabytes, or 1,048,576 kilobytes.
What is a 4 bit group?
A group of four bits is also called a nibble and has 24 = 16 possible values.