Function of a word meaning

In
recent years a new and entirely different approach to meaning known
as the functional approach has begun to take shape in linguistics and
especially in structural linguistics. The functional approach
maintains that the meaning of a linguistic unit may be studied only
through its relation to other linguistic-units and not through its
relation to either concept or referent. In a very simplified form
this view may be illustrated by the following: we know, for instance,
that the meaning of the two words move
and
movement
is
different because they function in speech differently. Comparing the
contexts in which we find these words we cannot fail to observe that
they occupy different positions in relation to other words. (To)
move, e.g.,
can be followed by a noun (move
the
chair), preceded by a pronoun (we move),
etc.
The position occupied by the word movement
is
different: it may be followed by a preposition (movement
of
smth),
preceded
by an adjective (slow movement),
and
so on. As the distribution ^l
of
the
two words is different, we are entitled to the conclusion that not
only do they belong to different classes of words, but that their
meanings are different too.

The
same is true of the different meanings of one and the same word.
Analysing the function of a word in linguistic contexts and comparing
these contexts, we conclude that; meanings are different (or the
same) and this fact can be proved by an objective investigation of
linguistic data. For example we can observe the difference of the
meanings of the word take
if
we examine its functions in different linguistic contexts, take
the tram (the taxi, the cab,, etc.)
as opposed to to
take to somebody.

It
follows that in the functional approach (1)
semantic
investigation is confined to the analysis of the difference or
sameness of meaning; (2)
meaning
is understood essentially as the function of the use of linguistic
units. As a matter of fact, this line of semantic investigation is
the primary concern, implied or expressed, of all structural
linguists.

¹
By
the term distribution
we understand the position of a linguistic unit in relation to other
linguistic units.

17

§ 4. Relation between the Two Approaches

When
comparing the two approaches described above in terms of methods of
linguistic analysis we see that the functional approach should not be
considered an alternative, but rather a valuable complement to the
referential theory. It is only natural that linguistic investigation
must start by collecting an adequate number of samples of contexts.¹
On examination the meaning or meanings of linguistic units will
emerge from the contexts themselves. Once this phase had been
completed it seems but logical to pass on to the referential phase
and try to formulate the meaning thus identified. There is absolutely
no need to set the two approaches against each other; each handles
its own side of the problem and neither is complete without the
other.

TYPES OF MEANING

It is more or less
universally recognised that word-meaning is not homogeneous but is
made up of various components the combination and the interrelation
of which determine to a great extent the inner facet of the word.
These components are usually described as types of meaning. The two
main types of meaning that are readily observed are the grammatical
and the lexical meanings to be found in words and word-forms.

§ 5. Grammatical Meaning

We
notice, e.g., that word-forms, such as girls,
winters, joys, tables, etc.
though denoting widely different objects of reality have something
in common. This common element is the grammatical meaning of
plurality which can be found in all of them.

Thus
grammatical meaning may be defined ,as the component of meaning
recurrent in identical sets of individual forms of different words,
as, e.g., the tense meaning in the word-forms of verbs (asked,
thought, walked, etc.)
or the case meaning in the word-forms of various nouns (girl’s,
boy’s, night’s, etc.).

In
a
broad sense it may be argued that linguists who make a distinction
between lexical and grammatical meaning are, in fact, making a
distinction between the functional (linguistic) meaning which
operates at various levels as the interrelation of various
linguistic units and referential (conceptual) meaning as the
interrelation of linguistic units and referents (or concepts).

In
modern linguistic science it is commonly held that some elements of
grammatical meaning can be identified by the position of the
linguistic unit in relation to other linguistic units, i.e. by its
distribution. Word-forms speaks,
reads, writes have
one and the same grammatical meaning as they can all be found in
identical distribution, e.g. only after the pronouns he,
she, it and
before adverbs like well,
badly, to-day, etc.

¹
It
is of interest to note that the functional approach is sometimes
described as contextual, as it is based on the analysis of various
contexts. See, e. g., St.
Ullmann. Semantics.
Oxford, 1962,
pp.
64-67.

18

It
follows that a certain component of the meaning of a word is
described when you identify it as a part of speech, since different
parts of speech are distributionally different (cf. my work and I
work).¹

Word meaning has played a quite marginal role in early contemporary philosophy of language, which was primarily concerned with the structural features of sentences and showed less interest in the format of lexical representations and in the nature of the word-level input to compositional processes. Nowadays, it is well-established that the way we account for word meaning is bound to have a major impact in tipping the balance in favor or against a given picture of the fundamental properties of human language. This entry provides an overview of the way issues related to lexical meaning have been explored in analytic philosophy and a summary of relevant research on the subject in neighboring scientific domains.

The idea of word and word meaning are difficult to define, and this is reflected in the difficulties one encounters in defining the basic terminology of lexical semantics. In part, this depends on the fact that the words ‘word’ and ‘meaning’ themselves have multiple meanings, depending on the context and the purpose they are used for (Matthews 1991). But the idea of word can be defined in two fundamental ways. On one side, we have linguistic definitions, which attempt to characterize the notion of word by illustrating the explanatory role words play or are expected to play in the context of a formal grammar. (e.g., Di Sciullo & Williams 1987). On the other side, we have metaphysical definitions, which attempt to elucidate the notion of word by describing the metaphysical type of words.

Because of lack of clarity affecting the notion of sense, and surely because of Russell’s (1905) authoritative criticism of Fregean semantics, word meaning disappeared from the philosophical scene during the 1920s and 1930s. The study of word meaning acquired the status of a mature academic enterprise in the 19th century, with the birth of historical-philological semantics (Section 2.2). Yet, matters related to word meaning had been the subject of much debate in earlier times. Word meaning constituted a prominent topic of inquiry in three classical traditions: speculative etymology, rhetoric, and lexicography (Meier-Oeser 2011; Geeraerts 2013).  There are two kinds of theory of word meaning. The first type of theory, that we can label a semantic theory of word meaning, is interested in clarifying what meaning-determining information is encoded by the lexical items of a natural language. an. The second type of theory, that we can label a foundational theory of word meaning, is interested in singling out the facts whereby lexical expressions come to have the semantic properties they have for their users.

A function word has little or no meaningful content. Function words are also known as grammatical words, grammatical functions, grammatical morphemes, function morphemes, form words, and empty words. In contrast to content words, function words, such as determiners and auxiliary verbs, do not have ‘content full’ meanings; rather, they are defined in terms of their use, or function. “Function words are like thumbtacks. We don’t notice thumbtacks; we look at the calendar or the poster they are holding up. If we were to take the tacks away, the calendar and the poster would fall down. Likewise, if we took the function words out of speech, it would be hard to figure out what was going on:

Literally the most misused word in the language has officially changed definition. Now as well as meaning “in a literal manner or sense; exactly: Changes in word meanings (a process called semantic shift) happen for various reasons and in various ways. Four common types of change are broadening, narrowing, amelioration, and pejoration. The meanings don’t change overnight. Different senses of the same word often overlap, and new meanings can co-exist with older meanings for centuries. In linguistic terms, polysemy is the rule, not the exception. Word usage is how a word, phrase, or concept is used in a language. Lexicographers gather samples of written or spoken instances where a word is used and analyze them to determine patterns of regional or social usage as well as meaning. Some words have different meanings, but are so closely related that there is confusion about their proper use. Function words are words that have little lexical meaning or have ambiguous meaning, but instead serve to express grammatical relationships with other words within a sentence, or specify the attitude or mood of the speaker.

Words have different meaning depending on the context and the purpose they are used . For example, in ordinary parlance ‘word’ is ambiguous between lexeme (as in “Color and colour are spellings of the same word”) and lexical unit (as in “there are thirteen words in the tongue-twister How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?”). Let us then elucidate the notion of word in a little more detail, and specify what key questions will guide our discussion of word meaning in the rest of the entry.

Many words with multiple meanings exist in the English language. Technically, almost every word has a multiple meaning.

When we start talking about words with multiple meanings, there are some basic definitions that we need to discuss first. Those definitions are the ones attached to homonyms, homophones, and homographs.

Homonyms are words which have the same spelling and pronunciation, but have different meanings.

Homophones are words which have the same pronunciation, but different spellings and meanings.

Homographs are words that are spelt the same, but have different pronunciation  and meanings.

Since the topic of words with multiple meanings is so broad, we will cover examples from each of these three unique areas. What follows are lists of homonyms, homophones, and homographs, and an explanation as to why each word belongs in that category if it is not apparent from the spellings.

Homonyms example:

crane: That bird is a crane./They had to use a crane to lift the object./She had to crane her neck to see the movie.

engaged: They got engaged on March 7th./The students were very engaged in the presentation.

foil: Please wrap the sandwich in foil./They learned about the role of a dramatic foil in English class.

leaves: The children love to play in the leaves./They do not like when their father leaves for work.

net: What was your net gain for the year?/Crabbing is easier if you bring a net along.

point: The pencil has a sharp point./It is not polite to point at people.

right: You were right./Make a right turn at the light.

rose: My favorite flower is a rose./He quickly rose from his seat.

type: He can type over 100 words per minute./That dress is really not her type.

Homophones Examples :

pale/pail, ate/eight, alter/altar, band/banned,  buy/bye, /red/read, blew/blue, boar/bore, canon/cannon, coarse/course, blew/blue, boar/bore, canon/cannon, coarse/course, fair/fare, genes/jeans, foul/fowl, grate/great, in/inn, hour/our, knight/night, nose/knows, maize/maze, meddle/metal, rain/reign, sea/see, role/roll, their/there, and veil/va

Homographs

read: She is going to read the book later./He read the book last night.

bass: They caught a bass./His voice belongs in the bass section.

bow: She put a bow in her daughter’s hair./Please bow down to the emperor.

minute: That is only a minute problem./Wait a minute!

learned: The class learned that information last week./He is a very learned individual.

sewer: The rats crept through the sewer./She is a fine sewer.

wound: They wound up the toy as soon as they got it./She received a wound from the punch.

does: He does his homework every night./There were many does in the forest.

wind: The wind swept up the leaves./Wind the clock up before you go to bed.

sow: A sow is a female pig./We’ll sow the seeds in springtime.(yourdictionary.com)

There are two fundamental way in defining the idea of word .First, we have linguistic definitions, which attempt to characterize the notion of word by illustrating the explanatory role words play or are expected to play in the context of a formal grammar. These approaches often end up splitting the notion of word into a number of more fine-grained and theoretically manageable notions, but still tend to regard ‘word’ as a term that zeroes in on a scientifically respectable concept (e.g., Di Sciullo & Williams 1987). For example, words are the primary locus of stress and tone assignment, the basic domain of morphological conditions on affixation, clitization, compounding, and the theme of phonological and morphological processes of assimilation, vowel shift, metathesis, and reduplication (Bromberger 2011).

In linguistics, a word is the smallest element that may be uttered in isolation with semantic or pragmatic content (with literal or practical meaning) This contrasts deeply with a morpheme, which is the smallest unit of meaning but will not necessarily stand on its own. A word may consist of a single morpheme (for example: oh!, rock, red, quick, run, expect), or several (rocks, redness, quickly, running, unexpected), whereas a morpheme may not be able to stand on its own as a word (in the words just mentioned, these are -s, -ness, -ly, -ing, un-, -ed). A complex word will typically include a root and one or more affixes (rock-s, red-ness, quick-ly, run-ning, un-expect-ed), or more than one root in a compound (black-board, rat-race). Words can be put together to build larger elements of language, such as phrases (a red rock), clauses (I threw a rock), and sentences (He threw a rock too, but he missed).

Second, we have metaphysical definitions, which attempt to elucidate the notion of word by describing the metaphysical type of words. This implies answering such questions as “what are words?”, “how should words be individuated?”, and “on what conditions two utterances count as utterances of the same word?”. For example, Kaplan (1990, 2011) has proposed to replace the orthodox type-token account of the relation between words and word occurrences with a “common currency” view on which words relate to their occurrences as continuants relate to stages in four-dimensionalist metaphysics (see the entries on types and tokens and identity over time.The adjective metaphysical entered the English language through Aristotle, whose “Metaphysics” is a collection of treatises that follows his work, “Physics.” “Physics” concerned natural philosophy, what we call science today, while “Metaphysics” dealt with more abstract questions about the reality beyond what we perceive with our senses. Look at a physical object, say an apple. At what exact point did that apple come into existence? If you eat it, does it cease to exist, or does it still exist but in a changed way? These are metaphysical questions.

There are two kinds of theory in word meaning. The term “theory of meaning” has figured, in one way or another, in a great number of philosophical disputes over the last century. Unfortunately, this term has also been used to mean a great number of different things.

The first sort of theory—a semantic theory—is a theory which assigns semantic contents to expressions of a language. Approaches to semantics may be divided according to whether they assign propositions as the meanings of sentences and, if they do, what view they take of the nature of these propositions.

The second sort of theory—a foundational theory of meaning—is a theory which states the facts in virtue of which expressions have the semantic contents that they have. Approaches to the foundational theory of meaning may be divided into theories which do, and theories which do not, explain the meanings of expressions of a language used by a group in terms of the contents of the mental states of members of that group

Each function word either gives some grammatical information on other words in a sentence or clause, and cannot be isolated from other words, or it may indicate the speaker’s mental model as to what is being said.

The following is a list of the kind of words considered to be function words:

Whether you’re trying to sound sophisticated or simply repeating what you’ve heard, word fails are all too common and can make smart people sound dumb.

Types of semantic change

The first type is broadening is a type of semantic change by which the meaning of a word becomes broader or more inclusive than its earlier meaning. Also known as semantic broadening, generalization, expansion, or extension .Broadening of meaning  occurs when a word with a specific or limited meaning is widened. The broadening process is technically called generalization. An example of generalization is the word business, which originally meant ‘the state of being busy, careworn, or anxious,’ and was broadened to encompass all kinds of work or occupations.”

Semantic narrowing is the second  type of semantic change by which the meaning of a word becomes less general or inclusive than its earlier meaning. Also  known as specialization or restriction. “Narrowing of meaning happens when a word with a general meaning is by degrees applied to something much more specific. The word litter, for example, meant originally (before 1300) ‘a bed,’ then gradually narrowed down to ‘bedding,’ then to ‘animals on a bedding of straw,’ and finally to things scattered about, odds and ends. . . Other examples of specialization are deer, which originally had the general meaning ‘animal,’ girl, which meant originally ‘a young person,’ and meat, whose original meaning was ‘food.’”

Third  is, amelioration is the upgrading or elevation of a word’s meaning, as when a word with a negative sense develops a positive one. Also  called melioration or elevation. Word  “ Dizzy” a example of amelioration during ME [Middle English] might be, depending on one’s viewpoint, the word dizzy. In OE [Old English] it meant ‘foolish,’ a meaning that survives marginally in such expressions as a dizzy blonde; but by ME its primary meaning was ‘suffering from vertigo.’”(C. M. Millward and Mary Hayes, A Biography of the English Language, 3rd ed. Wadsworth, 2011)

The last is, pejoration is the downgrading or depreciation of a word’s meaning, as when a word with a positive sense develops a negative one. Example is Hierarchy “Hierarchy shows a similar, though more pronounced, deterioration. Originally applied to an order or a host of angels from the fourteenth century, it has steadily moved down the scale of being, referring to ‘a collective body of ecclesiastical rulers’ from c. 1619, from whence the similar secular sense develops c.1643 (in Milton’s tract on divorce) Today one frequently hears of ‘the party hierarchy,’ ‘business hierarchies,’ and the like, denoting only the top of the hierarchy, not the whole order, and conveying the same nuances of hostility and envy implied in elite.”(Geoffrey Hughes, Words in Time: A Social History of the English Vocabulary. Basil Blackwell, 1988).

Word usage is how a word, phrase, or concept is used in a language. Lexicographers gather samples of written or spoken instances where a word is used and analyze them to determine patterns of regional or social usage as well as meaning. A word, for example the English word “donny” (a round rock about the size of a man’s head)[citation needed], may be only a rare regional usage, or a word may be used worldwide by all English speakers and have one or several evolving definitions .Word usage may also involve grammar.

Word Use, choosing the right word at the right time is often a challenging task because it requires recognizing the role context plays in determining the best means of communication. Choosing the right word to match the meaning you intend is an equally challenging task and a process that requires a fair amount of trial and error. Below you’ll find a few guidelines to help you in the selection process:

Consider what might be the right word(s) in a given context by evaluating your audience, their needs, and their understanding of your subject matter.

A word is “right” when it is used appropriately and in a context where its intended meaning, tone, and implications correspond to the those associated with it. In other words, the writer should understand and be comfortable with what the word means both denotatively and connotatively.

Denotation is the definition of a word as you would find it in a dictionary, while connotation refers to the implied meanings carried by a word. Connotations build from how a word is used in particular contexts. Moreover, two words might have the same denotative meaning, but differ in their connotations. For example, home and house both refer to ‘a shelter in which one or more people live.’ However, while house refers primarily to the physical structure, home generally refers not only to the structure itself but also to a person’s relationship to that structure, which connotes belonging and warmth.

Some words have different meanings, but are so closely related that there is confusion about their proper use. Consider the words continuously and continually, for example. Continuously means ‘unceasingly’ and continually means ‘regularly,’ so they are not properly interchangeable, and their similarity often causes confusion.

Another example is the difference between affect and effect. Because of similar spelling and pronunciation, many people use them interchangeably. To add to the confusion, each can function both as a noun and a verb. As a general rule, when talking about one thing influencing another, use affect as a verb to mean ‘to influence,’ and use effect as a noun to mean ‘a result’ or ‘the impact something or someone has on something or someone else.’ You can find a description of the other uses of affect and effect on Dictionary.com.

Sometimes a good dictionary will include the connotations of a word, but often it will contain only a basic definition. The most reliable way of learning how a word is generally used comes from careful observation of how a word is used in specific contexts.

Grammatical words, as a class, can have distinct phonological properties from content words. Grammatical words sometimes do not make full use of all the sounds in a language. For example, in some of the Khoisan languages, most content words begin with clicks, but very few function words do.[3] In English, very few words other than function words begin with voiced th-“[ð]”[citation needed] (see Pronunciation of English th); English function words may have fewer than three letters ‘I’, ‘an’, ‘in’ while non-function words usually have three or more ‘eye’, ‘Ann’, ‘inn’ (see three letter rule).

The following is a list of the kind of words considered to be function words:

Articles  — the and a. In some inflected languages, the articles may take on the case of the declension of the following noun.

Pronouns  —, as he — him, she — her, etc. A pronoun (I, me, he, she, herself, you, it, that, they, each, few, many, who, whoever, whose, someone, everybody, etc.) is a word that takes the place of a noun. In the sentence Joe saw Jill, and he waved at her, the pronouns he and her take the place of Joe and Jill, respectively.

Appositive  —  is a noun or noun phrase that renames another noun right beside it. The appositive can be a short or long combination of words. Look at these appositive examples, all of which rename insect: The insect, a cockroach, is crawling across the kitchen table.

Conjunctions — is the joining together of elements and it is a word that connects sentences, phrases or clauses. An example of conjunction is classmates coming together to solve a math problem. An example of conjunction is the word “and.”

auxiliary verbs  — forming part of the conjugation (pattern of the tenses of main verbs), always inflected An auxiliary verb (abbreviated aux) is a verb that adds functional or grammatical meaning to the clause in which it appears, such as to express tense, aspect, modality, voice, emphasis, etc. Auxiliary verbs usually accompany a main verb. The main verb provides the main semantic content of the clause.

interjections — sometimes called “filled pauses”, uninflected. An interjection is a part of speech that shows the emotion or feeling of the author. These words or phrases can stand alone or be placed before or after a sentence. Many times an interjection is followed by a punctuation mark, often an exclamation point.

particles   — convey the attitude of the speaker and are uninflected, as if, then, well, however, thus, etc.

expletives   — take the place of sentences, among other functions. The definition of an expletive is a crude or obscene expression, or an unnecessary word or phrase used to fill space in a sentence for grammar or rhythm purposes. An example of an expletive is saying “damn it.” An example of an expletive is adding “it is” in the sentence “time for us to eat.”

pro-sentences   — pro-sentence is a function word or expression that substitutes for a whole sentence whose content is recoverable from the context. A pro-sentence is a kind of pro-form and is therefore anaphoric. In English, yes, no, okay and amen are common pro-sentences.

Being clear and direct  does not preclude you from using those words as long as you use them correctly and as long as the context is right.

Sources:

Wikipedia.org

Скачать материал

Скачать материал

Описание презентации по отдельным слайдам:

• 

  1 слайд

  Word Meaning
  Lecture # 6
  Grigoryeva M.

• 

  2 слайд

  Word Meaning

  Approaches to word meaning

  Meaning and Notion (понятие)

  Types of word meaning

  Types of morpheme meaning

  Motivation

• 

  3 слайд

  Each word has two aspects:

  the outer aspect
  ( its sound form)
  cat

  the inner aspect
  (its meaning)
  long-legged, fury animal with sharp teeth
  and claws

• 

  4 слайд

  Sound and meaning do not always constitute a constant unit even in the same language

  EX a temple

  a part of a human head
  a large church

• 

  5 слайд

  Semantics (Semasiology)
  Is a branch of lexicology which studies the
  meaning of words and word equivalents

• 

  6 слайд

  Approaches to Word Meaning
  The Referential (analytical) approach

  The Functional (contextual) approach

  Operational (information-oriented) approach

• 

  7 слайд

  The Referential (analytical) approach
  formulates the essence of meaning by establishing the interdependence between words and things or concepts they denote

  distinguishes between three components closely connected with meaning:
  the sound-form of the linguistic sign,
  the concept
  the actual referent

• 

  8 слайд

  Basic Triangle
  concept (thought, reference) – the thought of the object that singles out its essential features
  referent – object denoted by the word, part of reality
  sound-form (symbol, sign) – linguistic sign
  concept – flower

  sound-form referent
  [rәuz]

• 

  9 слайд

  In what way does meaning correlate with
  each element of the triangle ?

  In what relation does meaning stand to
  each of them?

• 

  10 слайд

  Meaning and Sound-form
  are not identical
  different
  EX. dove — [dΛv] English sound-forms
  [golub’] Russian BUT
  [taube] German
  the same meaning

• 

  11 слайд

  Meaning and Sound-form
  nearly identical sound-forms have different meanings in different languages
  EX. [kot] Russian – a male cat
  [kot] English – a small bed for a child

  identical sound-forms have different meanings (‘homonyms)
  EX. knight [nait]
  night [nait]

• 

  12 слайд

  Meaning and Sound-form
  even considerable changes in sound-form do not affect the meaning

  EX Old English lufian [luvian] – love [l Λ v]

• 

  13 слайд

  Meaning and Concept
  concept is a category of human cognition

  concept is abstract and reflects the most common and typical features of different objects and phenomena in the world

  meanings of words are different in different languages

• 

  14 слайд

  Meaning and Concept
  identical concepts may have different semantic structures in different languages

  EX. concept “a building for human habitation” –
  English Russian
  HOUSE ДОМ

  + in Russian ДОМ
  “fixed residence of family or household”
  In English HOME

• 

  15 слайд

  Meaning and Referent

  one and the same object (referent) may be denoted by more than one word of a different meaning
  cat
  pussy
  animal
  tiger

• 

  16 слайд

  Meaning
  is not identical with any of the three points of the triangle –
  the sound form,
  the concept
  the referent

  BUT
  is closely connected with them.

• 

  17 слайд

  Functional Approach
  studies the functions of a word in speech
  meaning of a word is studied through relations of it with other linguistic units
  EX. to move (we move, move a chair)
  movement (movement of smth, slow movement)

  The distriution ( the position of the word in relation to
  others) of the verb to move and a noun movement is
  different as they belong to different classes of words and
  their meanings are different

• 

  18 слайд

  Operational approach
  is centered on defining meaning through its role in
  the process of communication

  EX John came at 6
  Beside the direct meaning the sentence may imply that:
  He was late
  He failed to keep his promise
  He was punctual as usual
  He came but he didn’t want to

  The implication depends on the concrete situation

• 

  19 слайд

  Lexical Meaning and Notion
  Notion denotes the reflection in the mind of real objects

  Notion is a unit of thinking
  Lexical meaning is the realization of a notion by means of a definite language system
  Word is a language unit

• 

  20 слайд

  Lexical Meaning and Notion
  Notions are international especially with the nations of the same cultural level

  Meanings are nationally limited

  EX GO (E) —- ИДТИ(R)
  “To move”
  BUT !!!
  To GO by bus (E)
  ЕХАТЬ (R)

  EX Man -мужчина, человек
  Она – хороший человек (R)
  She is a good person (E)

• 

  21 слайд

  Types of Meaning
  Types of meaning

  grammatical
  meaning

  lexico-grammatical
  meaning
  lexical meaning
  denotational
  connotational

• 

  22 слайд

  Grammatical Meaning
  component of meaning recurrent in identical sets of individual forms of different words

  EX. girls, winters, toys, tables –
  grammatical meaning of plurality

  asked, thought, walked –
  meaning of past tense

• 

  23 слайд

  Lexico-grammatical meaning
  (part –of- speech meaning)
  is revealed in the classification of lexical items into:
  major word classes (N, V, Adj, Adv)
  minor ones (artc, prep, conj)

  words of one lexico-grammatical class have the same paradigm

• 

  24 слайд

  Lexical Meaning
  is the meaning proper to the given linguistic unit in all its forms and distributions

  EX . Go – goes — went
  lexical meaning – process of movement

• 

  25 слайд

  PRACTICE
  Group the words into 3 column according to the grammatical, lexical or part-of –speech meaning
  Boy’s, nearest, at, beautiful,
  think, man, drift, wrote,
  tremendous, ship’s, the most beautiful,
  table, near, for, went, friend’s,
  handsome, thinking, boy,
  nearer, thought, boys,
  lamp, go, during.

• 

  26 слайд

  Grammatical
  The case of nouns: boy’s, ship’s, friend’s
  The degree of comparison of adj: nearest, the most beautiful
  The tense of verbs: wrote, went, thought

  Lexical
  Think, thinking, thought
  Went, go
  Boy’s, boy, boys
  Nearest, near, nearer
  At, for, during (“time”)
  Beautiful, the most beautiful

  Part-of-speech
  Nouns—verbs—adj—-prep

• 

  27 слайд

  Aspects of Lexical meaning
  The denotational aspect

  The connotational aspect

  The pragmatic aspect

• 

  28 слайд

  Denotational Meaning
  “denote” – to be a sign of, stand as a symbol for”

  establishes the correlation between the name and the object
  makes communication possible

  EX booklet
  “a small thin book that gives info about smth”

• 

  29 слайд

  PRACTICE
  Explain denotational meaning

  A lion-hunter
  To have a heart like a lion
  To feel like a lion
  To roar like a lion
  To be thrown to the lions
  The lion’s share
  To put your head in lion’s mouth

• 

  30 слайд

  PRACTICE

  A lion-hunter
  A host that seeks out celebrities to impress guests
  To have a heart like a lion
  To have great courage
  To feel like a lion
  To be in the best of health
  To roar like a lion
  To shout very loudly
  To be thrown to the lions
  To be criticized strongly or treated badly
  The lion’s share
  Much more than one’s share
  To put your head in lion’s mouth

• 

  31 слайд

  Connotational Meaning
  reflects the attitude of the speaker towards what he speaks about
  it is optional – a word either has it or not

  Connotation gives additional information and includes:
  The emotive charge EX Daddy (for father)
  Intensity EX to adore (for to love)
  Imagery EX to wade through a book
  “ to walk with an effort”

• 

  32 слайд

  PRACTICE
  Give possible interpretation of the sentences

  She failed to buy it and felt a strange pang.
  Don’t be afraid of that woman! It’s just barking!
  He got up from his chair moving slowly, like an old man.
  The girl went to her father and pulled his sleeve.
  He was longing to begin to be generous.
  She was a woman with shiny red hands and work-swollen finger knuckles.

• 

  33 слайд

  PRACTICE
  Give possible interpretation of the sentences
  She failed to buy it and felt a strange pang.
  (pain—dissatisfaction that makes her suffer)
  Don’t be afraid of that woman! It’s just barking!
  (make loud sharp sound—-the behavior that implies that the person is frightened)
  He got up from his chair moving slowly, like an old man.
  (to go at slow speed—was suffering or was ill)
  The girl went to her father and pulled his sleeve.
  (to move smth towards oneself— to try to attract smb’s attention)
  He was longing to begin to be generous.
  (to start doing— hadn’t been generous before)
  She was a woman with shiny red hands and work-swollen finger knuckles.
  (colour— a labourer involved into physical work ,constant contact with water)

• 

  34 слайд

  The pragmatic aspect of lexical meaning

  the situation in which the word is uttered,
  the social circumstances (formal, informal, etc.),
  social relationships between the interlocutors (polite, rough, etc.),
  the type and purpose of communication (poetic, official, etc.)

  EX horse (neutral)
  steed (poetic)
  nag (slang)
  gee-gee (baby language)

• 

  35 слайд

  PRACTICE
  State what image underline the meaning

  I heard what she said but it didn’t sink into my mind.
  You should be ashamed of yourself, crawling to the director like that.
  They seized on the idea.
  Bill, chasing some skirt again?
  I saw him dive into a small pub.
  Why are you trying to pin the blame on me?
  He only married her for her dough.

• 

  36 слайд

  PRACTICE
  State what image underline the meaning
  I heard what she said but it didn’t sink into my mind.
  (to understand completely)
  You should be ashamed of yourself, crawling to the director like that.
  (to behave humbly in order to win favour)
  They seized on the idea.
  (to be eager to take and use)
  Bill, chasing some skirt again?
  (a girl)
  I saw him dive into a small pub.
  (to enter suddenly)
  Why are you trying to pin the blame on me?
  (to blame smb unfairly)
  He only married her for her dough.
  (money)

• 

  37 слайд

  Types of Morpheme Meaning
  lexical
  differential
  functional
  distributional

• 

  38 слайд

  Lexical Meaning in Morphemes
  root-morphemes that are homonymous to words possess lexical meaning
  EX. boy – boyhood – boyish

  affixes have lexical meaning of a more generalized character
  EX. –er “agent, doer of an action”

• 

  39 слайд

  Lexical Meaning in Morphemes
  has denotational and connotational components
  EX. –ly, -like, -ish –
  denotational meaning of similiarity
  womanly , womanish

  connotational component –
  -ly (positive evaluation), -ish (deragotary) женственный — женоподобный

• 

  40 слайд

  Differential Meaning
  a semantic component that serves to distinguish one word from all others containing identical morphemes

  EX. cranberry, blackberry, gooseberry

• 

  41 слайд

  Functional Meaning
  found only in derivational affixes
  a semantic component which serves to
  refer the word to the certain part of speech

  EX. just, adj. – justice, n.

• 

  42 слайд

  Distributional Meaning
  the meaning of the order and the arrangement of morphemes making up the word
  found in words containing more than one morpheme
  different arrangement of the same morphemes would make the word meaningless
  EX. sing- + -er =singer,
  -er + sing- = ?

• 

  43 слайд

  Motivation
  denotes the relationship between the phonetic or morphemic composition and structural pattern of the word on the one hand, and its meaning on the other

  can be phonetical
  morphological
  semantic

• 

  44 слайд

  Phonetical Motivation
  when there is a certain similarity between the sounds that make up the word and those produced by animals, objects, etc.

  EX. sizzle, boom, splash, cuckoo

• 

  45 слайд

  Morphological Motivation
  when there is a direct connection between the structure of a word and its meaning
  EX. finger-ring – ring-finger,

  A direct connection between the lexical meaning of the component morphemes
  EX think –rethink “thinking again”

• 

  46 слайд

  Semantic Motivation
  based on co-existence of direct and figurative meanings of the same word

  EX a watchdog –
  ”a dog kept for watching property”

  a watchdog –
  “a watchful human guardian” (semantic motivation)

• 

• 

  48 слайд

  Analyze the meaning of the words.
  Define the type of motivation
  a) morphologically motivated
  b) semantically motivated

  Driver
  Leg
  Horse
  Wall
  Hand-made
  Careless
  piggish

• 

  49 слайд

  Analyze the meaning of the words.
  Define the type of motivation
  a) morphologically motivated
  b) semantically motivated
  Driver
  Someone who drives a vehicle
  morphologically motivated
  Leg
  The part of a piece of furniture such as a table
  semantically motivated
  Horse
  A piece of equipment shaped like a box, used in gymnastics
  semantically motivated

• 

  50 слайд

  Wall
  Emotions or behavior preventing people from feeling close
  semantically motivated
  Hand-made
  Made by hand, not machine
  morphologically motivated
  Careless
  Not taking enough care
  morphologically motivated
  Piggish
  Selfish
  semantically motivated

• 

  51 слайд

  I heard what she said but it didn’t sink in my mind
  “do down to the bottom”
  ‘to be accepted by mind” semantic motivation

  Why are you trying to pin the blame on me?
  “fasten smth somewhere using a pin” –
  ”to blame smb” semantic motivation

  I was following the man when he dived into a pub.
  “jump into deep water” –
  ”to enter into suddenly” semantic motivation

  You should be ashamed of yourself, crawling to the director like that
  “to move along on hands and knees close to the ground” –
  “to behave very humbly in order to win favor” semantic motivation

Найдите материал к любому уроку, указав свой предмет (категорию), класс, учебник и тему:

6 209 121 материал в базе

• Выберите категорию:

• Выберите учебник и тему

• Выберите класс:

• Тип материала:

  • Все материалы

  • Статьи

  • Научные работы

  • Видеоуроки

  • Презентации

  • Конспекты

  • Тесты

  • Рабочие программы

  • Другие методич. материалы

Найти материалы

Вам будут интересны эти курсы:

• Курс повышения квалификации «Формирование компетенций межкультурной коммуникации в условиях реализации ФГОС»

• Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Клиническая психология: теория и методика преподавания в образовательной организации»

• Курс повышения квалификации «Введение в сетевые технологии»

• Курс повышения квалификации «История и философия науки в условиях реализации ФГОС ВО»

• Курс повышения квалификации «Основы построения коммуникаций в организации»

• Курс повышения квалификации «Организация практики студентов в соответствии с требованиями ФГОС медицинских направлений подготовки»

• Курс повышения квалификации «Правовое регулирование рекламной и PR-деятельности»

• Курс повышения квалификации «Организация маркетинга в туризме»

• Курс повышения квалификации «Источники финансов»

• Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Техническая диагностика и контроль технического состояния автотранспортных средств»

• Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Осуществление и координация продаж»

• Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Технический контроль и техническая подготовка сварочного процесса»

• Курс профессиональной переподготовки «Управление качеством»