Comes community from word

The English-language word “community” derives from the Old French comuneté (currently “Communauté”), which comes from the Latin communitas “community”, “public spirit” (from Latin communis, “common”).

Latin commūnitās
The first records of the word community comes from around 1325. It comes from the Latin commūnitās, meaning “joint possession or use.” A community has something in common, such as a geographic location or a shared culture.

Agora: The Greek word for “community” or “gathering place.”

Etymology 1
From Middle English commune, comune, from Old French comune, commune, from Medieval Latin commūnia, from Latin commūne (“community, state”), from commūnis (“common”). See also community, communion, common.

What is the root word of communal?

Communal and community both come from Latin communis “common, of the community”—if a pool is communal, it can be used by the members of the community that owns it.

How are communities formed?

Throughout history, groups of people have formed communities to increase their chances of survival. They may have shared an interest in providing food for their families so they joined with others to hunt or farm.Often people shared a common interest, such as a religion, which gave them a sense of community.

community

• association.
• center.
• company.
• district.
• nation.
• neighborhood.
• people.
• public.

Community (TV series)

Community
Genre	Sitcom
Created by	Dan Harmon
Starring	Joel McHale Gillian Jacobs Danny Pudi Yvette Nicole Brown Alison Brie Donald Glover Ken Jeong Chevy Chase Jim Rash
Opening theme	“At Least It Was Here” by The 88

ד. ה (a.d.h). The most common word for community refers to the one typically centered around a place of worship or another type of institution. This is a קְהִלָּה (keh-hee-LAH).

Commūnis is derived from con- (“prefix indicating a being or bringing together of several objects”) (from cum (“with”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *ḱóm (“along, at, next to, with”)) + mūnus (“employment, office, service; burden, duty, obligation”) (ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *mey- (“to change,

Are there any communes in the UK?

There are more than 400 such “intentional” communities across the UK.A surprising number are longstanding country communes, such as Bergholt Hall, founded in the heyday of the 1960s and 70s back-to-the-land and self-sufficiency movements.

How do communes make money?

Communes, which are income sharing, pool their money before costs appear. No matter how little or much money each member makes, it is put into a collective pool, out of which the group’s expenses are paid.In theory, the answer is simple: find a group of people and start pooling your incomes.

What is the difference between a commune and a community?

is that commune is a small community, often rural, whose members share in the ownership of property, and in the division of labour; the members of such a community while community is a group sharing a common understanding and often the same language, manners, tradition and law see civilization.

A community is a social unit (a group of living things) with commonality such as norms, religion, values, customs, or identity. Communities may share a sense of place situated in a given geographical area (e.g. a country, village, town, or neighbourhood) or in virtual space through communication platforms.

What does communal mean mean?

Definition of communal
1 : of or relating to one or more communes a communal organization. 2 : of or relating to a community. 3a : characterized by collective ownership and use of property. b : participated in, shared, or used in common by members of a group or community a communal kitchen gathered for a communal meal.

communal. / (ˈkɒmjʊnəl) / adjective. belonging or relating to a community as a whole.

Community history refers to the popular practice of history research and writing in settings outside university history departments, in towns, villages and cities throughout Britain.It is in relation to the issue of sustainability that community history has found a niche.

A community is made up of all of the populations in an area. The living and nonliving factors that living organisms need plus the communities of organisms themselves make up an ecosystem. A habitat is where an organism lives and a niche is what it does to make a living.

Communities create a sense of belonging for its members. Everyone feels like they’re a part of something important. It becomes a source of pride for the people involved.The ‘feeling of belonging’ which we get from a community is so much more than just a group of people.

Noun. An inhabitant of a particular town or city. citizen. burgher. denizen.

community. Antonyms: segregation, secession, independence, dissociation, disconnection, rivalry, hostility, animosity, estrangement, dissimilarity, contrariance, heterogeneity.

The English-language word “community” derives from the Old French comuneté (currently “Communauté”), which comes from the Latin communitas “community”, “public spirit” (from Latin communis, “common”).

When was the word community first used?

1400

What does the root word Commun mean?

1300, “belonging to all, owned or used jointly, general, of a public nature or character,” from Old French comun “common, general, free, open, public” (9c., Modern French commun), from Latin communis “in common, public, shared by all or many; general, not specific; familiar, not pretentious.” This is from a …

What are the members of the community?

Community members are at the heart of healthy communities. They include all who live, learn, work, play, and pray in communities. Community members may have a formal leadership role in a community organization, or friends and neighbors may recognize them as the person who gets things done.

What is the Three role of the family in the society?

The family ideally serves several functions for society. It socializes children, provides practical and emotional support for its members, regulates sexual reproduction, and provides its members with a social identity. Reflecting conflict theory’s emphases, the family may also produce several problems.

What are the functions of social organizations to your life as a member of the community?

Community organization aims to organize, mobilize and educate people to build a sense of community. By doing so, the community gains power or influence over issues concerning their welfare.

What is the role of organization in the community?

Organizations are important for your community because they focus each community’s needs specifically. These organizations are the gateway to voice your opinion to government organizations. Community based organizations make improvements at a family level according to your environment.

What are the functions of social organization to your life as a member of the school and community?

It socializes children, it provides emotional and practical support for its members, it helps regulate sexual activity and sexual reproduction, and it provides its members with a social identity.

Why school is a social Organisation?

Schools are complex social settings where students, teachers, administrators, and parents interact to shape a child’s educational experience. The Social Organization of Schooling also looks at how social norms in schools are shaped and reinforced by interactions among teachers and students.

What are the two types of social groups?

On the basis of contact among the member, social groups are divided into two types: Primary and Secondary Group.

• Primary Group.
• Secondary Group.
• In-group.
• Out-group.
• Formal Group.
• Informal Group.
• Involuntary Group.
• Voluntary Group.

What are different types of Organisation?

7 types of organizational structures (+ org charts for implementation)

• Hierarchical org structure.
• Functional org structure.
• Horizontal or flat org structure.
• Divisional org structures (market-based, product-based, geographic)
• Matrix org structure.
• Team-based org structure.
• Network org structure.

На основании Вашего запроса эти примеры могут содержать грубую лексику.

На основании Вашего запроса эти примеры могут содержать разговорную лексику.

The financial support for the community comes from crowdfunding.

I understand where this community comes from.

Our Global community comes from more than 150 different countries.

The collective intelligence of a community comes from idea flow; we learn from the ideas that surround us, and others learn from us…

Коллективный разум сообщества возникает из потока идей и примеров, в который мы все погружены; мы учимся у окружающих, а они учатся у нас.

The strength of community comes from this diversity and the ease with which someone can join us, and means that we are constantly changing and improving, often in unexpected ways.

Сила сообщества состоит в его многообразии и лёгкости, с которой к нему можно присоединиться, а также подразумевает наше постоянное изменение и улучшение, часто неожиданными способами.

The domestic expert community comes from the fact that a counteraction of various threats and challenges is only possible when Russia maintains its status as a great empire, which it has been for centuries.

Отечественное экспертное сообщество исходит из того, что противодействие различным вызовам и угрозам возможно только при сохранении за Россией статуса великой державы, каковой она является на протяжении столетий.

The collective intelligence of a community comes from the surrounding flow of ideas and examples; we learn from others in our environment, and these others learn from us.

Коллективный разум сообщества возникает из потока идей и примеров, в который мы все погружены; мы учимся у окружающих, а они учатся у нас.

It is estimated that 82 per cent of this community comes from 10 countries, and 61 per cent from the neighbouring countries (Peru, Argentina and the Plurinational State of Bolivia).

Около 82% всех иммигрантов прибыли из десяти стран и 61% — из соседних с Чили стран (Перу, Аргентина и Боливия).

This is where real community comes from.

Community comes from the word «common.»

Community comes from the word «common.»

Community comes from strong women as well as strong men.

Ничего не найдено для этого значения.

Результатов: 12. Точных совпадений: 12. Затраченное время: 405 мс

Documents

Корпоративные решения

Спряжение

Синонимы

Корректор

Справка и о нас

Индекс слова: 1-300, 301-600, 601-900

Индекс выражения: 1-400, 401-800, 801-1200

Индекс фразы: 1-400, 401-800, 801-1200

The word community comes from the Latin communis, meaning «common, public, shared by all or many.»

<—(East Cleveland, OH, Euclid Avenue in 1951)

The Latin term communitatus from which the English word «community» comes, is comprised of three elements, «Com-» — a Latin prefix meaning with or together, «-Munis-» — ultimately Proto-Indo-European in origin, it has been suggested that it means «the changes or exchanges that link» and «-tatus» a Latin suffix suggesting diminutive, small, intimate or local.

German sociologist, Ferdinand Tönnies, presented a concise differentiation between the terms «community» (gemeinschaft) and «society» (gesellschaft). In his 1887 work, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, Tönnies argued that «community» is perceived to be a tighter and more cohesive social entity within the context of the larger society, due to the presence of a «unity of will.» He added that family and kinship were the perfect expressions of community but that other shared characteristics, such as place or belief, could also result in gemeinschaft.

If the sense of community exists, both freedom and security exist as well. The community then takes on a life of its own, as people become free enough to share and secure enough to get along. The sense of connectedness and formation of social networks comprise what has become known as social capital.

Social capital is defined by Harvard University Political Scientist Robert D. Putnam as «the collective value of all social networks (who people know) and the inclinations that arise from these networks to do things for each other (norms of reciprocity).»

A community is a social unit (a group of living things) with commonality such as place, norms, religion, values, customs, or identity. Communities may share a sense of place situated in a given geographical area (e.g. a country, village, town, or neighbourhood) or in virtual space through communication platforms. Durable good relations that extend beyond immediate genealogical ties also define a sense of community, important to their identity, practice, and roles in social institutions such as family, home, work, government, society, or humanity at large.^[1] Although communities are usually small relative to personal social ties, «community» may also refer to large group affiliations such as national communities, international communities, and virtual communities.^[2]

The English-language word «community» derives from the Old French comuneté (Modern French: communauté), which comes from the Latin communitas «community», «public spirit» (from Latin communis, «common»).^[3]

Human communities may have intent, belief, resources, preferences, needs, and risks in common, affecting the identity of the participants and their degree of cohesiveness.^[4]

Perspectives of various disciplines[edit]

Archaeology[edit]

Archaeological studies of social communities use the term «community» in two ways, paralleling usage in other areas. The first is an informal definition of community as a place where people used to live. In this sense it is synonymous with the concept of an ancient settlement—whether a hamlet, village, town, or city. The second meaning resembles the usage of the term in other social sciences: a community is a group of people living near one another who interact socially. Social interaction on a small scale can be difficult to identify with archaeological data. Most reconstructions of social communities by archaeologists rely on the principle that social interaction in the past was conditioned by physical distance. Therefore, a small village settlement likely constituted a social community and spatial subdivisions of cities and other large settlements may have formed communities. Archaeologists typically use similarities in material culture—from house types to styles of pottery—to reconstruct communities in the past. This classification method relies on the assumption that people or households will share more similarities in the types and styles of their material goods with other members of a social community than they will with outsiders.^[5]

Sociology[edit]

This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (January 2022)

Ecology[edit]

In ecology, a community is an assemblage of populations—potentially of different species—interacting with one another. Community ecology is the branch of ecology that studies interactions between and among species. It considers how such interactions, along with interactions between species and the abiotic environment, affect social structure and species richness, diversity and patterns of abundance. Species interact in three ways: competition, predation and mutualism:

• Competition typically results in a double negative—that is both species lose in the interaction.
• Predation involves a win/lose situation, with one species winning.
• Mutualism sees both species co-operating in some way, with both winning.

The two main types of ecological communities are major communities, which are self-sustaining and self-regulating (such as a forest or a lake), and minor communities, which rely on other communities (like fungi decomposing a log) and are the building blocks of major communities.

Semantics[edit]

The concept of «community» often has a positive semantic connotation, exploited rhetorically by populist politicians and by advertisers^[6]
to promote feelings and associations of mutual well-being, happiness and togetherness^[7]—veering towards an almost-achievable utopian community.

In contrast, the epidemiological term «community transmission» can have negative implications,^[8] and instead of a «criminal community»^[9] one often speaks of a «criminal underworld» or of the «criminal fraternity».

Key concepts[edit]

Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft[edit]

In Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (1887), German sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies described two types of human association: Gemeinschaft (usually translated as «community») and Gesellschaft («society» or «association»). Tönnies proposed the Gemeinschaft–Gesellschaft dichotomy as a way to think about social ties. No group is exclusively one or the other. Gemeinschaft stress personal social interactions, and the roles, values, and beliefs based on such interactions. Gesellschaft stress indirect interactions, impersonal roles, formal values, and beliefs based on such interactions.^[10]

[edit]

In a seminal 1986 study, McMillan and Chavis^[11] identify four elements of «sense of community»:

1. membership: feeling of belonging or of sharing a sense of personal relatedness,
2. influence: mattering, making a difference to a group and of the group mattering to its members
3. reinforcement: integration and fulfillment of needs,
4. shared emotional connection.

A «sense of community index» (SCI) was developed by Chavis and colleagues, and revised and adapted by others. Although originally designed to assess sense of community in neighborhoods, the index has been adapted for use in schools, the workplace, and a variety of types of communities.^[12]

Studies conducted by the APPA^[who?] indicate that young adults who feel a sense of belonging in a community, particularly small communities, develop fewer psychiatric and depressive disorders than those who do not have the feeling of love and belonging.^[13]

[edit]

The process of learning to adopt the behavior patterns of the community is called socialization. The most fertile time of socialization is usually the early stages of life, during which individuals develop the skills and knowledge and learn the roles necessary to function within their culture and social environment. For some psychologists, especially those in the psychodynamic tradition, the most important period of socialization is between the ages of one and ten. But socialization also includes adults moving into a significantly different environment where they must learn a new set of behaviors.^[15]

Socialization is influenced primarily by the family, through which children first learn community norms. Other important influences include schools, peer groups, people, mass media, the workplace, and government. The degree to which the norms of a particular society or community are adopted determines one’s willingness to engage with others. The norms of tolerance, reciprocity, and trust are important «habits of the heart», as de Tocqueville put it, in an individual’s involvement in community.

[edit]

Community development is often linked with community work or community planning, and may involve stakeholders, foundations, governments, or contracted entities including non-government organisations (NGOs), universities or government agencies to progress the social well-being of local, regional and, sometimes, national communities. More grassroots efforts, called community building or community organizing, seek to empower individuals and groups of people by providing them with the skills they need to effect change in their own communities.^[17] These skills often assist in building political power through the formation of large social groups working for a common agenda. Community development practitioners must understand both how to work with individuals and how to affect communities’ positions within the context of larger social institutions. Public administrators, in contrast, need to understand community development in the context of rural and urban development, housing and economic development, and community, organizational and business development.

Formal accredited programs conducted by universities, as part of degree granting institutions, are often used to build a knowledge base to drive curricula in public administration, sociology and community studies. The General Social Survey from the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago and the Saguaro Seminar at the Harvard Kennedy School are examples of national community development in the United States. The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University in New York State offers core courses in community and economic development, and in areas ranging from non-profit development to US budgeting (federal to local, community funds). In the United Kingdom, the University of Oxford has led in providing extensive research in the field through its Community Development Journal,^[18] used worldwide by sociologists and community development practitioners.

At the intersection between community development and community building are a number of programs and organizations with community development tools. One example of this is the program of the Asset Based Community Development Institute of Northwestern University. The institute makes available downloadable tools^[19] to assess community assets and make connections between non-profit groups and other organizations that can help in community building. The Institute focuses on helping communities develop by «mobilizing neighborhood assets» – building from the inside out rather than the outside in.^[20] In the disability field, community building was prevalent in the 1980s and 1990s with roots in John McKnight’s approaches.^[21][22]

Community building and organizing[edit]

In The Different Drum: Community-Making and Peace (1987) Scott Peck argues that the almost accidental sense of community that exists at times of crisis can be consciously built. Peck believes that conscious community building is a process of deliberate design based on the knowledge and application of certain rules.^[23] He states that this process goes through four stages:^[24]

1. Pseudocommunity: When people first come together, they try to be «nice» and present what they feel are their most personable and friendly characteristics.
2. Chaos: People move beyond the inauthenticity of pseudo-community and feel safe enough to present their «shadow» selves.
3. Emptiness: Moves beyond the attempts to fix, heal and convert of the chaos stage, when all people become capable of acknowledging their own woundedness and brokenness, common to human beings.
4. True community: Deep respect and true listening for the needs of the other people in this community.

In 1991, Peck remarked that building a sense of community is easy but maintaining this sense of community is difficult in the modern world.^[25] An interview with M. Scott Peck by Alan Atkisson. In Context #29, p. 26.
The three basic types of community organizing are grassroots organizing, coalition building, and «institution-based community organizing», (also called «broad-based community organizing», an example of which is faith-based community organizing, or Congregation-based Community Organizing).^[26]

Community building can use a wide variety of practices, ranging from simple events (e.g., potlucks, small book clubs) to larger-scale efforts (e.g., mass festivals, construction projects that involve local participants rather than outside contractors).

Community building that is geared toward citizen action is usually termed «community organizing».^[27] In these cases, organized community groups seek accountability from elected officials and increased direct representation within decision-making bodies. Where good-faith negotiations fail, these constituency-led organizations seek to pressure the decision-makers through a variety of means, including picketing, boycotting, sit-ins, petitioning, and electoral politics.

Community organizing can focus on more than just resolving specific issues. Organizing often means building a widely accessible power structure, often with the end goal of distributing power equally throughout the community. Community organizers generally seek to build groups that are open and democratic in governance. Such groups facilitate and encourage consensus decision-making with a focus on the general health of the community rather than a specific interest group.

If communities are developed based on something they share in common, whether location or values, then one challenge for developing communities is how to incorporate individuality and differences. Rebekah Nathan suggests^{[according to whom?]} in her book, My Freshman Year, we are drawn to developing communities totally based on sameness, despite stated commitments to diversity, such as those found on university websites.

[edit]

A number of ways to categorize types of community have been proposed. One such breakdown is as follows:

1. Location-based Communities: range from the local neighbourhood, suburb, village, town or city, region, nation or even the planet as a whole. These are also called communities of place.
2. Identity-based Communities: range from the local clique, sub-culture, ethnic group, religious, multicultural or pluralistic civilisation, or the global community cultures of today. They may be included as communities of need or identity, such as disabled persons, or frail aged people.
3. Organizationally-based Communities: range from communities organized informally around family or network-based guilds and associations to more formal incorporated associations, political decision-making structures, economic enterprises, or professional associations at a small, national or international scale.
4. Intentional Communities: a mix of all three previous types, these are highly cohesive residential communities with a common social or spiritual purpose, ranging from monasteries and ashrams to modern ecovillages and housing cooperatives.

The usual categorizations of community relations have a number of problems:^[28] (1) they tend to give the impression that a particular community can be defined as just this kind or another; (2) they tend to conflate modern and customary community relations; (3) they tend to take sociological categories such as ethnicity or race as given, forgetting that different ethnically defined persons live in different kinds of communities—grounded, interest-based, diasporic, etc.^[29]

In response to these problems, Paul James and his colleagues have developed a taxonomy that maps community relations, and recognizes that actual communities can be characterized by different kinds of relations at the same time:^[30]

1. Grounded community relations. This involves enduring attachment to particular places and particular people. It is the dominant form taken by customary and tribal communities. In these kinds of communities, the land is fundamental to identity.
2. Life-style community relations. This involves giving primacy to communities coming together around particular chosen ways of life, such as morally charged or interest-based relations or just living or working in the same location. Hence the following sub-forms:
   1. community-life as morally bounded, a form taken by many traditional faith-based communities.
   2. community-life as interest-based, including sporting, leisure-based and business communities which come together for regular moments of engagement.
   3. community-life as proximately-related, where neighbourhood or commonality of association forms a community of convenience, or a community of place (see below).
3. Projected community relations. This is where a community is self-consciously treated as an entity to be projected and re-created. It can be projected as through thin advertising slogan, for example gated community, or can take the form of ongoing associations of people who seek political integration, communities of practice^[31] based on professional projects, associative communities which seek to enhance and support individual creativity, autonomy and mutuality. A nation is one of the largest forms of projected or imagined community.

In these terms, communities can be nested and/or intersecting; one community can contain another—for example a location-based community may contain a number of ethnic communities.^[32] Both lists above can used in a cross-cutting matrix in relation to each other.

Internet communities[edit]

In general, virtual communities value knowledge and information as currency or social resource.^{[33][34][35][36]} What differentiates virtual communities from their physical counterparts is the extent and impact of «weak ties», which are the relationships acquaintances or strangers form to acquire information through online networks.^[37] Relationships among members in a virtual community tend to focus on information exchange about specific topics.^[38][39] A survey conducted by Pew Internet and The American Life Project in 2001 found those involved in entertainment, professional, and sports virtual-groups focused their activities on obtaining information.^[40]

An epidemic of bullying and harassment has arisen from the exchange of information between strangers, especially among teenagers,^[41] in virtual communities. Despite attempts to implement anti-bullying policies, Sheri Bauman, professor of counselling at the University of Arizona, claims the «most effective strategies to prevent bullying» may cost companies revenue.^[42]

Virtual Internet-mediated communities can interact with offline real-life activity, potentially forming strong and tight-knit groups such as QAnon.^[43]

See also[edit]

• Circles of Sustainability
• Communitarianism
• Community theatre
• Engaged theory
• Outline of community
• Wikipedia community

Notes[edit]

References[edit]

• Barzilai, Gad. 2003. Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage: 2000. What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Chavis, D.M., Hogge, J.H., McMillan, D.W., & Wandersman, A. 1986. «Sense of community through Brunswick’s lens: A first look.» Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 24–40.
• Chipuer, H.M., & Pretty, G.M.H. (1999). A review of the Sense of Community Index: Current uses, factor structure, reliability, and further development. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 643–58.
• Christensen, K., et al. (2003). Encyclopedia of Community. 4 volumes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Cohen, A. P. 1985. The Symbolic Construction of Community. Routledge: New York.
• Durkheim, Émile. 1950 [1895] The Rules of Sociological Method. Translated by S.A. Solovay and J.H. Mueller. New York: The Free Press.
• Cox, F., J. Erlich, J. Rothman, and J. Tropman. 1970. Strategies of Community Organization: A Book of Readings. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
• Effland, R. 1998. The Cultural Evolution of Civilizations Mesa Community College.
• Giddens, A. 1999. «Risk and Responsibility» Modern Law Review 62(1): 1–10.
• James, Paul (1996). Nation Formation: Towards a Theory of Abstract Community. London: Sage Publications.
• Lenski, G. 1974. Human Societies: An Introduction to Macrosociology. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
• Long, D.A., & Perkins, D.D. (2003). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Sense of Community Index and Development of a Brief SCI. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 279–96.
• Lyall, Scott, ed. (2016). Community in Modern Scottish Literature. Brill | Rodopi: Leiden | Boston.
• Nancy, Jean-Luc. La Communauté désœuvrée – philosophical questioning of the concept of community and the possibility of encountering a non-subjective concept of it
• Muegge, Steven (2013). «Platforms, communities and business ecosystems: Lessons learned about entrepreneurship in an interconnected world». Technology Innovation Management Review. 3 (February): 5–15. doi:10.22215/timreview/655.
• Newman, D. 2005. Sociology: Exploring the Architecture of Everyday Life, Chapter 5. «Building Identity: Socialization» Archived 2012-01-06 at the Wayback Machine Pine Forge Press. Retrieved: 2006-08-05.
• Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster
• Sarason, S.B. 1974. The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1986. «Commentary: The emergence of a conceptual center.» Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 405–07.
• Smith, M.K. 2001. Community. Encyclopedia of informal education. Last updated: January 28, 2005. Retrieved: 2006-07-15.