Christ god jesus word

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with
God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with
God; all things were made through him, and without him was
not anything made that was made. In him was life, and the
life was the light of men. . . . And the Word became flesh
and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth; we have
beheld his glory, glory as of the only Son from the
Father.
(John 1:1-4, 14)

Icon: "Revealing Christ in the Scriptures (Fr. Ted's Blog).
Icon: «Revealing Christ in the Scriptures (Fr. Ted’s Blog).

    

The Evangelist John, known in the Orthodox Church as John
the Theologian, proclaimed Jesus to be the incarnate Word
of God. John is very clear WHO the Word of God is: Jesus
Christ, the incarnate Son of God to whom the Scriptures
bore witness.

You search the scriptures, because you think that in
them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear
witness to me…
(John 5:39)

Thus the written revelation of God, the Scriptures bear
witness to the Word of God. As Jesus teaches, Moses
inspired by God to write the Torah, was actually writing
about the Word of God who was to become incarnate.

If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he
wrote of me.
(John 5:46)

And beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he
interpreted to them in all the scriptures the things
concerning himself
. (Luke 24:27)

Not only Moses but all the prophets and all the authors of
Scripture were inspired to write about the coming Messiah,
the Word of God.

Then he said to them, ‘These are my words which
I spoke to you, while I was still with you, that
everything written about me in the law of Moses and the
prophets and the psalms must be fulfilled.’ Then he
opened their minds to understand the
scriptures…
(Luke 24:44-45)

In this blog series I intend to explore the relationship
between our Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, and the
Scriptures, the written record of God’s revelation.
As in all my blog series, this is not a scholarly
researched paper. I am simply drawing upon quotes that I
tagged from books I read over the past 30 years and am now
assembling together into this blog series. The quotes are
ideas I came across in my reading over several decades
which stood out in my mind when I read the books. I am now
bringing the quotes together to explore the relationship
between the Word of God and the Scriptures. Obviously if
Jesus is literally the Word of God, then the Scriptures
are the Word of God in some other way. They are the
written record of God’s revelation, but Jesus is the
full revelation of God. The Scriptures bear witness to
Him. It is of Jesus that all the Scriptures
speak.   In this blog series we will look at
various aspects of how the Scriptures are related to the
Word of God.

Even when we think about the Word of God as being a
written text, which we call the Bible, we have to realize
the Bible is a collection of books written over hundreds
of years by different authors. Some of the books show
signs that there were several different authors/editors
involved in bringing together the texts of a book. The
Church still considers the texts inspired—whether
one author or several had a hand in writing the book, or
whether a book was edited by several different people, or
even if we don’t know who the author(s) of a book
are, we still consider the Scriptures to be inspired by
God. Absolute certainty about the authorship of a text, or
total knowledge of the history of a book of the Bible,
does not determine its inspiration.   Even when
the books of the bible show several different versions of
the same story, sometimes placed side by side within one
book of the Bible, the Church accepts the received texts
and all its variations as being inspired. The Church in
history accepted as inspired the Septuagint translation
into Greek of the ancient Hebrew and Aramaic texts, as
well as the original texts from which they were
translated.

The first thing I will mention about our Bible, and the
books accepted by the Church as being part of our
Scriptures, is that not only was the Bible written over
many centuries, but the bringing together of all the texts
and deciding which texts exactly belong to the canonical
Scriptures also took centuries. We see in the historical
documents clear evidence that inspired saints, the Fathers
of the Church did have at times slightly different ideas
about which books constituted the official scriptures of
the Church. Additionally, there is a great deal of
literature which compares and contrasts even the
differences in the official texts of the Bible in the
various Christian traditions (Latin, Greek, Syriac,
Ethiopian, Coptic, etc) . Here I will only mention a few
quotes that gives us a sense some of the differences in
the Church Fathers through the centuries about what is
officially in the bible. In the 2nd Century we find one
attempt at establishing what books belong in the Bible
(the fact that this has to be established shows us that
there was not exact agreement on what books officially
belong in the canonical Bible).

Melito (d. ca 180ad) visited the Holy Land with a view to
establishing the list of the canonical books of the Old
Testament. According to Eusebius (EH 4.26) (d. 339AD), his
list does not contain the book of Esther, which
incidentally is also missing from the biblical remains of
the Dead Sea Scrolls found at Qumran   (Geza
Vermes, Christian Beginnings, Kindle Loc. 3424-26).

Melitio’s Bible agrees with the Qumran
community’s “canon”. That community was
a dissident group of Jews outside of mainstream Judaism in
Jerusalem.

A 4th Century Document, The Apostolic Constitutions
(written ca 375AD), says this about the Canon: “Let
the following books be esteemed venerable and holy by you,
both of the clergy and laity. Of the Old Covenant: the
five books of Moses— Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus,
Numbers, and Deuteronomy; one of Joshua the son of Nun,
one of the Judges, one of Ruth, four of the Kings, two of
the Chronicles, two of Ezra, one of Esther, one of Judith,
three of the Maccabees, one of Job, one hundred and fifty
psalms; three books of Solomon— Proverbs,
Ecclesiastes, and the Song of Songs; sixteen prophets. And
besides these, take care that your young persons learn the
Wisdom of the very learned Sirach. But our sacred books,
that is, those of the New Covenant, are these: the four
Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John; the fourteen
Epistles of Paul; two Epistles of Peter, three of John,
one of James, one of Jude; two Epistles of Clement; and
the Constitutions dedicated to you the bishops by me
Clement, in eight books; which it is not fit to publish
before all, because of the mysteries contained in them;
and the Acts of us the Apostles.” (The Apostolic
Constitutions, Kindle Loc. 4894-4900)

That 4th century canon of Scripture has many more books
than officially ended up in the Bible of today. It gives
us a sense that there was not one canon accepted by all
Christians in the 4th Century. In the 8th Century, St.
John of Damascus (d. 749) wrote a book that many consider
authoritative in the Orthodox world for delineating
doctrine.   Note in his comments especially what
he considers to be the canonical books of the New
Testament. He is writing 400 years after many think the
Christian canon had been closed. St. John says:

The New Testament contains four gospels, that according to
Matthew, that according to Mark, that according to Luke,
that according to John: the Acts of the Holy Apostles by
Luke the Evangelist: seven catholic epistles, viz. one of
James, two of Peter, three of John, one of Jude: fourteen
letters of the Apostle Paul: the Revelation of John the
Evangelist: the Canons of the holy apostles, by
Clement.” ( Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith,
Kindle Loc.3180-3221)

St. John includes in the Bible as he knows it the letters
of Clement but also those canons of the Holy Apostles
mentioned from the 4th Century. He includes as Scripture
even more than the 4th Century Apostolic Constitution did.

Finally, in the 12th Century St Peter of Damaskos
(Damascus) says this of the Canon of Scripture which he
accepted:

These books include first of all the Old and the New
Testaments, that is, the Pentateuch, the Psalter, the Four
Books of Kings, the Six Books of Wisdom, the Prophets, the
Chronicles, the Acts of the Apostles, the Holy Gospels and
the commentaries on all these… (St. Peter of
Damaskos—12th Century, THE PHILOKALIA, Kindle Loc.
25654-56).

St. Peter seems almost to have an open canon of Scripture
for he includes all of the commentaries (supposedly the
Patristic ones) on the Scriptures. The issue of Canon had
to do with what writings people believe bore witness to
Jesus Christ, the incarnate Word of God. The Scriptures
are those writing which bear witness to Christ, and so in
different centuries they had differing ideas about what
bore authentic witness to the Word of God. All of these
lists would have the common theme that the
Scriptures—whatever books are included in the
Bible—bear witness to the truth and help us
recognize Jesus Christ as Lord.

WHY IS JESUS CHRIST CALLED “THE WORD OF GOD?”

by Shawn Brasseaux

This epithet is exclusive to the Apostle John’s writings—the Book of John, the Book of 1 John, and the Book of the Revelation. It, or its abbreviated variant “The Word,” appears seven times in the whole Bible canon. John’s Gospel Record is designed to underscore Jesus Christ’s Deity. (Compare the openings of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. John 1:1-4 is unique to John; Matthew, Mark, and Luke all begin their accounts with events relating to Christ’s humanity.) It is thus not surprising that John’s special phrase, “the Word of God,” is intended to accentuate Christ’s Deity:

  • John 1:1: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
  • John 1:14: “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.”
  • 1 John 1:1: “That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;….”
  • 1 John 5:7: “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”
  • Revelation 19:13: “And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.”

The term “word” carries the idea of communication. In Greek, it is logos. Depending on the context, logos can be rendered as—“preaching,” “something said,” “utterance,” “reason,” “saying,” “speech,” “talk,” “account,” and so on. Think of our related English words logic and logo. A “logo,” for example, is a symbol or design that represents a group, idea, line of products, and so on. This symbol conveys a message. The Greek word is the same line of thought.

According to Scripture, there are three Members/Persons in the Godhead or Trinity—Father, Son, and Holy Ghost (Matthew 28:19; 2 Corinthians 13:14; 1 John 5:7). Unless they make themselves known in a special way, we cannot see them with our human eyes. The Person of Jesus Christ (God the Son) is a representative of the Godhead. Turn to John 14:6-9: “[6] Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. [7] If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him. [8] Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. [9] Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?”

What the Father and the Holy Spirit want us to see and know, Jesus Christ reveals it to us so we can see and know. If we want to see how God lives, all we have to do is read the Four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). This is how God conducted His own life in His own human flesh. Even today, we can see God living His life in human flesh. This is the Church the Body of Christ (all present-day believers in Jesus Christ). It is called “the Body of Christ” because it is His life being manifested through Christians—we are His arms, His legs, His hands, His feet, and His voice. We accurately portray His life as we walk daily in faith in His Word to us (more on this later).

Father God sent Jesus Christ as His spokesman to the nation Israel. For example, John 7:16: “Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.God the Father had given some information to Jesus Christ, so Jesus Christ could then relay it to Israel. Jesus is the Spokesman of the Godhead. He is “The Word of God” in this sense.

Now, read Matthew 15:24: “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Hebrews 3:1: “Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle [sent-one] and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus;….” When Jesus Christ left Earth and ascended back into Heaven, He sent His 12 Apostles to be His spokesmen to Israel. They were to repeat what He taught them.

Matthew chapter 10: “[5] These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: [6] But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel…. [16] Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.” And verse 40: He that receiveth you receiveth me, and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me.” Mark 3:14: “And he ordained twelve, that they should be with him, and that he might send them forth to preach,….” John 20:21: “Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.” Finally, John 13:20: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth me; and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me.”

God the Father sent Jesus Christ as His Messenger, and Jesus Christ sent messengers (12 Apostles) to Israel. If Israel rejected the 12 Apostles, they were really rejecting Jesus Christ who sent them, and they were rejecting God the Father who sent Jesus Christ to them in the first place.

After His ascension into Heaven, the Lord Jesus Christ sent the Apostle Paul to be His spokesman to us Gentiles. Look at two verses. Firstly, Acts 22:21: “And he said unto me, Depart: for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles.” Now, Acts 26:17: “Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,…..” Paul thus wrote in Romans 11:13: “For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle [sent-one] of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:….” And, remember Jesus’ words in John 13:20: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth me; and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me. If we reject Paul, then we reject God’s messenger to us!

Whenever there were appearances of God in the Old Testament economy, they were Jesus Christ in pre-incarnate forms. It was not Father God, and it was not the Holy Spirit. First Timothy 6:16: “[Jesus Christ] Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; [God the Father; verse 13] whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.” And John 1:18: No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.” Colossians 2:9: “For in him [Christ] dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.” The way we see and hear Father God is by paying attention to Jesus Christ: He is the one Mediator between God and men.

First Timothy 2:3-6: “[3] For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; [4] Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. [5] For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; [6] Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.” As God, Jesus Christ can take God by the hand. As Man, He can take man by the hand. He thus joins them together through His finished crosswork at Calvary. The barrier of sin is demolished because Jesus Christ died for our sins. Without God communicating that information through Jesus Christ, and then Jesus Christ giving that information to Paul, we would not know it.

Jesus Christ is thus “The Word of God”—the embodiment of the whole message God wants to give to mankind! In 1 John 1:1, Jesus is called “the Word of life,” meaning God’s entire communication to man can be summarized as “life.” If we want to see what true life is really like, how God designed it to function for His glory, we look to “the Word of life,” the Lord Jesus Christ! If we want eternal (spiritual) life, we look to the Lord Jesus Christ! John 14:6: “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

SUPPLEMENTAL #1: THE CHIEF SPEAKER

To better reinforce in our minds what the title “The Word of God” is actually conveying as pertaining to Jesus Christ, turn to Acts chapter 14: “[9] The same heard Paul speak: who stedfastly beholding him, and perceiving that he had faith to be healed, [10] Said with a loud voice, Stand upright on thy feet. And he leaped and walked. [11] And when the people saw what Paul had done, they lifted up their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia, The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men. [12] And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he was the chief speaker.” Focus on “the chief speaker” at the close of verse 12. In Greek, it is, ho hegoumenos tou logon.” As Paul was the “chief speaker [logos]” of the Paul–Barnabas duo, so Jesus Christ is the “chief speaker” among the Members of the Godhead.

SUPPLEMENTAL #2: THE HOLY BIBLE

“The word of God” is also a title of the Holy Bible. Hebrews 4:12, for example: “For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” In Scripture, we find the communication from God. The only way to know the Living Word of God (Jesus Christ) is through the Written Word of God (Holy Scripture). While far beyond the scope of this study, there is a very close affinity between the Living Word and the Written Word. Both are necessary to learn everything the Godhead has to tell us.

Also see:
» Did not God send messengers to Gentiles prior to Paul’s apostleship?
» Has God’s Word failed?
» Does Jesus Christ save us, or does the Gospel save us?

When one sees “word” in the Bible, this noun might refer to Scripture as a whole, to a specific idea or statement, or to the person of Jesus. Context is important: Historical, literary, cultural, and also the “close” context, which includes words, ideas, what book we are in, and history.

Close context is “everything we see when we read the page in front of us, both the divine and human aspects of the book,” wrote Jeremy Bouma.

But there are times when “The Word” appears to represent all three meanings above. The words on the page are inspired by God, describe God, and embody him all at the same time.

The Word as Scripture

“Word” in Hebrew is “sepher,” which points to a physical book or document. Jesus read from a scroll at the synagogue in Nazareth (Luke 4). Although the writing of Revelation itself is full of literary devices, John sees literal scrolls in his vision.

Romans 15:4 encourages disciples to read the Bible for “whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction, that through endurance and through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.”

Paul and the writer of Hebrews describe literal writing — the Torah, in which God had said: “Man does not live by bread alone, but man lives by every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord” (Deuteronomy 8:3).

Jews understood that the Lord’s word was powerful. As the writer of Hebrews explains, the word of God is “living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword” (Hebrews 4:12).

Word in Many Roles

In the New Testament, we get a new sense of “word.” “Logos” is Greek for “a word (as embodying an idea), a statement, a speech.” The word “logos” can refer to all of Scripture, but also specific ideas and individual words conveyed through God’s messengers, and even a report or “an accounting.”

“Logos” connects writing with speech in power through Jesus. “Everyone who hears these words of mine and acts on them will be like a wise man who built his house on a rock” (Matthew 7:24). “Say the word and my servant will be healed” (Matthew 8:8).

In Matthew 8:26, Jesus “rebuked the winds and the waves, and it was completely calm.” He who spoke the wind and water into being maintained authority over them. Jairus, the woman with the 12-year-bleed, and the Centurion whose servant was healed — they recognized that a word from Jesus was sufficient to immediately heal or even resurrect.

The Name of Jesus in Isaiah

“Word” describes the embodiment of God’s written and spoken message. At least two uses of “word” in Isaiah could refer to the Messiah as “Word.” “So shall my word be that goes out from my mouth; it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose, and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it” (Isaiah 55:11).

The verb “sent” in Isaiah 55:11 strongly conveys the image of a person being appointed to a task. “I have guarded them, and not one of them has been lost except the son of destruction, that the Scripture might be fulfilled” (John 17:12).

In Hebrew, “goes out from my mouth” or “goes forth” is “yatsa,” which can be translated into several words. The ones which are most evocative of Immanuel are “born” and “appeared.”

Isaiah 40:8 declares “the grass withers and the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever.” Both his law and Jesus are eternal and accomplish God’s purpose.

Jesus the Word and John’s Gospel

John’s imagery leaves no room for doubt: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1). Later John writes, “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (1:14).

John’s vision of Christ in Revelation 19:13 also identifies Jesus, “clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God.” Christ spoke, fulfilled, and embodied the Word.

In “John’s Appropriation of Isaiah’s Signs Theology,” Andreas J. Köstenberger explains how the beloved disciple was inspired by Isaiah, referring to many “points of contact” between these two books of the Bible. John’s gospel is both a work of truth and of literary beauty and pleasing unity of form.

According to Köstenberger, Isaiah’s work features similar structural elements. Isaiah shares the message of the Good News, which is coming to Israel; John shares the message made incarnate. Isaiah combines “oracles, prophecies, and reports; but the common theme is the message of salvation.”

The theme of John’s gospel is “that Jesus is the promised Messiah and Son of God” (ESV Study Bible). They are a call and response; a thread running from the Old Testament promise to its fulfillment in the New Testament.

Wayne proposes that John named Jesus Word of God because “what God had to say to us was not only or mainly what Jesus said, but who Jesus was and what he did.” The entire work from Genesis to Revelation is about Jesus.

What was being revealed overtime was finally made manifest in the person of Christ. Jesus did more than speak truth; he is truth: “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth” (John 17:17).

Jesus’ Word Associations

As Luke Wayne points out, Jesus uses the term “word of God” to mean “Scripture.” Jesus spoke against the way the Pharisees gave priority to “their oral traditions over the biblical writings” saying in Matthew 15:6, “for the sake of your tradition you have made void the word of God.”

To our modern ears, with the rise of “cancel culture,” making Jesus void sounds like “canceling” him. The Pharisees sought to cancel the influence of Jesus’ message, which undermined their authority. Not only did they wish to void the words he spoke but the man as well.

After all, Pilate and the Roman court had no desire to kill Jesus: Pressure came from the Jewish leaders. “Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds. ‘I find no guilt in this man.’ But they were urgent, saying ‘He stirs up the people’” (Luke 23:4-5).

Even as they rejected the Messiah, the chief priests were acknowledging the power of what he had to say and also the power of the person of Christ.

Even after he had ascended, many religious leaders were afraid of Jesus’ name. They still sought to void his power by arresting and even killing Peter and the apostles.

Gamaliel counseled the priests against execution, although the apostles were beaten and the authorities “charged them not to speak in the name of Jesus,” but “they did not cease teaching and preaching that the Christ is Jesus” (Acts 5:40, 42). His very name provoked either great fear or tremendous hope and courage.

The Word Is from God

“So the words ‘in the beginning’ mean: Before there was any created matter, there was the Word, the Son of God.” John is putting the pieces together; connecting the beginning of God’s story with the fulfillment of his plans in Jesus.

Not only is Jesus eternal, present with the Lord before creation, but he is also One with God. Intrinsic to Christian faith is this understanding of the Trinity in which Christ is God and also indwelling believers as the Holy Spirit.

We define God in many ways: As truth, life, light, and so on. These terms also define Jesus. The overarching message finds unity in John 1:1 — the word of God is truth. The truth of God is his word. Jesus is the truth, and God, and the Word.

All of these descriptors contribute to a whole picture of Christ, which encompasses all of these things and the words themselves.

The Trustworthy Promise

“This Book of the Law shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do according to all that is written in it. For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success” (Joshua 1:8).

Words can hurt or heal. They are meaningful, but not all words are trustworthy. Fortunately for believers, Scripture is trustworthy because it is affirmed by Jesus. He urged his listeners to hunger more for God’s word than for bread, promising it would satisfy where nothing else could.

For further reading:   

How To Read the Bible in Context

Why Is Reading the Bible in Context Important?

John’s Appropriation of Isaiah’s Signs Theology: Implications for the Structure of John’s Gospel

Can the Bible be the Word of God if Jesus is the Word of God?

What Does the Phrase ‘In the Beginning Was the Word’ Mean?

Should Christians Follow the Book of the Law Today?

What Does it Mean That the Bible is God-Breathed?

Photo Credit: ©iStock/Getty Images Plus/artisteer



Candice Lucey
 is a freelance writer from British Columbia, Canada, where she lives with her family. Find out more about her here.

Don Stewart

One of the titles of Jesus was the Word of God. In John’s gospel we read.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (John 1:1).

John also wrote.

The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth (John 1:14).

In the Book of Revelation it says.

He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God (Revelation 19:13).

This Term Is Not Defined

Although there is no explanation given in Scripture as to why Jesus is called the Word of God there have been several suggested reasons.

It May Refer To Wisdom Personified

It has been argued that Jesus is the personification of wisdom as is described in Proverbs 5-8. This section begins by saying.

My son, pay attention to my wisdom, listen well to my words of insight (Proverbs 5:1).

The Word Is God’s Communication To Humanity

It is possible that the term «word» is used the same manner as does the Old Testament — the communication of God to humanity. This is exactly what Jesus did — He revealed to the world the Word of God. Jesus was the personification of the written and spoken Word. In the Old Testament God revealed His word through the prophets while in the New Testament the word of God was revealed in a Person — God the Son.

Summary

Jesus is called, «the Word of God.» Although Scripture does not define what is meant by that term it could refer to the fact that He is the personification of the written and spoken word. The testimony that God revealed through the prophets during the Old Testament period was now made human with the coming of Christ. Hence the Word became flesh.

Jesus[d] (c. 4 BC – AD 30 or 33), also referred to as Jesus Christ (Hebrew: יֵשׁוּעַ המשיח) or Jesus of Nazareth (among other names and titles), was a first-century Jewish preacher and religious leader.[10] He is the central figure of Christianity, the world’s largest religion. Most Christians believe he is the incarnation of God the Son and the awaited Messiah (the Christ) prophesied in the Hebrew Bible.

Jesus

Spas vsederzhitel sinay.jpg

The Christ Pantocrator of Saint Catherine’s Monastery at Mount Sinai, 6th century AD

Born c. 4 BC[a]

Herodian Kingdom of Judea, Roman Empire[5]

Died AD 30 or 33 (aged 33–36)

Jerusalem, Judea, Roman Empire

Cause of death Crucifixion[b]
Known for Central figure of Christianity
Parents
  • Mary
  • Joseph[c]

Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically.[e] Accounts of Jesus’ life are contained in the Gospels, especially the four canonical Gospels in the New Testament. Academic research has yielded uncertainty on the historical reliability of the Gospels and how closely they reflect the historical Jesus.[18][f] Jesus was a Galilean Jew who was circumcised, was baptized by John the Baptist, began his own ministry,[10] and was often referred to as «rabbi».[21] Jesus debated with fellow Jews on how to best follow God, engaged in healings, taught in parables, and gathered followers.[22][23] He was arrested and tried by the Jewish authorities,[24] turned over to the Roman government, and crucified on the order of Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect of Jerusalem.[22] After his death, his followers believed he rose from the dead, and the community they formed eventually became the early Christian Church.[25] Accounts of his teachings and life were initially conserved by oral transmission, which was the source of the written Gospels.[26]

Christian theology includes the beliefs that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, was born of a virgin named Mary, performed miracles, founded the Christian Church, died by crucifixion as a sacrifice to achieve atonement for sin, rose from the dead, and ascended into Heaven, from where he will return.[27] Commonly, Christians believe Jesus enables people to be reconciled to God. The Nicene Creed asserts that Jesus will judge the living and the dead,[28] either before or after their bodily resurrection,[29][30][31] an event tied to the Second Coming of Jesus in Christian eschatology.[32] The great majority of Christians worship Jesus as the incarnation of God the Son, the second of three persons of the Trinity.[g] The birth of Jesus is celebrated annually on 25 December as Christmas.[h] His crucifixion is honored on Good Friday and his resurrection on Easter Sunday. The world’s most widely used calendar era—in which the current year is AD 2023 (or 2023 CE)—is based on the approximate birthdate of Jesus.[33]

Jesus is also revered in Baha’i faith,[34] Druze faith,[35] Islam and Manichaeism. In Islam, Jesus (often referred to by his Quranic name ʿĪsā) is considered the penultimate prophet of God and the messiah,[36] who will return before the Day of Judgement. Muslims believe Jesus was born of the virgin Mary but was neither God nor a son of God.[37][38][39] Most Muslims do not believe that he was killed or crucified but that God raised him into Heaven while he was still alive.[i] In contrast, Judaism rejects the belief that Jesus was the awaited messiah, arguing that he did not fulfill messianic prophecies, and was neither divine nor resurrected.[40]

Name

Naming conventions

A typical Jew in Jesus’ time had only one name, sometimes followed by the phrase «son of [father’s name]», or the individual’s hometown.[41] Thus, in the New Testament, Jesus is commonly referred to as «Jesus of Nazareth».[j] Jesus’ neighbors in Nazareth refer to him as «the carpenter, the son of Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon», «the carpenter’s son», or «Joseph’s son»; In the Gospel of John, the disciple Philip refers to him as «Jesus son of Joseph from Nazareth». The English name Jesus, from Greek Iesous, is a rendering of Joshua (Hebrew Yehoshua, later Yeshua), and was not uncommon in Judea at the time of the birth of Jesus.[42] Yeshua/Yehoshua means «Yahweh is lordly», but popular etymology linked it to the verb meaning «save» and the noun «salvation»,[42] and the Gospel of Matthew tells of an angel that appeared to Joseph instructing him «to name him Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins».[43]

Jesus Christ

Since the early period of Christianity, Christians have commonly referred to Jesus as «Jesus Christ».[44] The word Christ was a title or office («the Christ»), not a given name.[45][46] It derives from the Greek Χριστός (Christos),[47][48] a translation of the Hebrew mashiakh (משיח) meaning «anointed», and is usually transliterated into English as «messiah».[49] In biblical Judaism, sacred oil was used to anoint certain exceptionally holy people and objects as part of their religious investiture.[50]

Christians of the time designated Jesus as «the Christ» because they believed him to be the messiah, whose arrival is prophesied in the Hebrew Bible and Old Testament. In postbiblical usage, Christ became viewed as a name — one part of «Jesus Christ». Etymons of the term Christian (meaning a follower of Christ) have been in use since the 1st century.[51]

Life and teachings in the New Testament

Canonical gospels

The four canonical gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are the foremost sources for the life and message of Jesus.[41] But other parts of the New Testament also include references to key episodes in his life, such as the Last Supper in 1 Corinthians 11:23–26.[52][53][54][55] Acts of the Apostles[56] refers to Jesus’ early ministry and its anticipation by John the Baptist.[57][58] Acts 1:1–11[59] says more about the Ascension of Jesus[60] than the canonical gospels do.[61] In the undisputed Pauline letters, which were written earlier than the Gospels, Jesus’ words or instructions are cited several times.[62][k]

Some early Christian groups had separate descriptions of Jesus’ life and teachings that are not in the New Testament. These include the Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Peter, and Gospel of Judas, the Apocryphon of James, and many other apocryphal writings. Most scholars conclude that these were written much later and are less reliable accounts than the canonical gospels.[65][66][67]

The canonical gospels are four accounts, each by a different author. The authors of the Gospels are all anonymous, attributed by tradition to the four evangelists, each with close ties to Jesus:[68] Mark by John Mark, an associate of Peter;[69] Matthew by one of Jesus’ disciples;[68] Luke by a companion of Paul mentioned in a few epistles;[68] and John by another of Jesus’ disciples,[68] the «beloved disciple».[70]

According to the Marcan priority, the first to be written was the Gospel of Mark (written AD 60–75), followed by the Gospel of Matthew (AD 65–85), the Gospel of Luke (AD 65–95), and the Gospel of John (AD 75–100).[71] Most scholars agree that the authors of Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source for their gospels. Since Matthew and Luke also share some content not found in Mark, many scholars assume that they used another source (commonly called the «Q source») in addition to Mark.[72]

One important aspect of the study of the Gospels is the literary genre under which they fall. Genre «is a key convention guiding both the composition and the interpretation of writings».[73] Whether the gospel authors set out to write novels, myths, histories, or biographies has a tremendous impact on how they ought to be interpreted. Some recent studies suggest that the genre of the Gospels ought to be situated within the realm of ancient biography.[74][75][76] Although not without critics,[77] the position that the Gospels are a type of ancient biography is the consensus among scholars today.[78][79]

Concerning the accuracy of the accounts, viewpoints run the gamut from considering them inerrant descriptions of Jesus’ life,[80] to doubting whether they are historically reliable on a number of points,[81] to considering them to provide very little historical information about his life beyond the basics.[82][83] According to a broad scholarly consensus, the Synoptic Gospels (the first three—Matthew, Mark, and Luke) are the most reliable sources of information about Jesus.[84][85][41]

Comparative structure and content

Matthew, Mark, and Luke are known as the Synoptic Gospels, from the Greek σύν (syn «together») and ὄψις (opsis «view»),[86][87][88] because they are similar in content, narrative arrangement, language and paragraph structure, and one can easily set them next to each other and synoptically compare what is in them.[86][87][89] Scholars generally agree that it is impossible to find any direct literary relationship between the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John.[90] While the flow of many events (e.g., Jesus’ baptism, transfiguration, crucifixion and interactions with his apostles) are shared among the Synoptic Gospels, incidents such as the transfiguration and Jesus’ exorcizing demons[91] do not appear in John, which also differs on other matters, such as the Cleansing of the Temple.[92]

The Synoptics emphasize different aspects of Jesus. In Mark, Jesus is the Son of God whose mighty works demonstrate the presence of God’s Kingdom.[69] He is a tireless wonder worker, the servant of both God and man.[93] This short gospel records few of Jesus’ words or teachings.[69] The Gospel of Matthew emphasizes that Jesus is the fulfillment of God’s will as revealed in the Old Testament, and the Lord of the Church.[94] He is the «Son of David», a «king», and the messiah.[93][95] Luke presents Jesus as the divine-human savior who shows compassion to the needy.[96] He is the friend of sinners and outcasts, come to seek and save the lost.[93] This gospel includes well-known parables, such as the Good Samaritan and the Prodigal Son.[96]

The prologue to the Gospel of John identifies Jesus as an incarnation of the divine Word (Logos).[97] As the Word, Jesus was eternally present with God, active in all creation, and the source of humanity’s moral and spiritual nature.[97] Jesus is not only greater than any past human prophet but greater than any prophet could be. He not only speaks God’s Word; he is God’s Word.[98] In the Gospel of John, Jesus reveals his divine role publicly. Here he is the Bread of Life, the Light of the World, the True Vine and more.[93]

In general, the authors of the New Testament showed little interest in an absolute chronology of Jesus or in synchronizing the episodes of his life with the secular history of the age.[99] As stated in John 21:25, the Gospels do not claim to provide an exhaustive list of the events in Jesus’ life.[100] The accounts were primarily written as theological documents in the context of early Christianity, with timelines as a secondary consideration.[101] In this respect, it is noteworthy that the Gospels devote about one third of their text to the last week of Jesus’ life in Jerusalem, referred to as the Passion.[102] The Gospels do not provide enough details to satisfy the demands of modern historians regarding exact dates, but it is possible to draw from them a general picture of Jesus’ life story.[81][99][101]

Genealogy and nativity

Jesus was Jewish,[10] born to Mary, wife of Joseph.[103] The Gospels of Matthew and Luke offer two accounts of his genealogy. Matthew traces Jesus’ ancestry to Abraham through David.[104][105] Luke traces Jesus’ ancestry through Adam to God.[106][107] The lists are identical between Abraham and David, but differ radically from that point. Matthew has 27 generations from David to Joseph, whereas Luke has 42, with almost no overlap between the names on the two lists.[l][108] Various theories have been put forward to explain why the two genealogies are so different.[m]

Matthew and Luke each describe Jesus’ birth, especially that Jesus was born to a virgin named Mary in Bethlehem in fulfillment of prophecy. Luke’s account emphasizes events before the birth of Jesus and centers on Mary, while Matthew’s mostly covers those after the birth and centers on Joseph.[109][110][111] Both accounts state that Jesus was born to Joseph and Mary, his betrothed, in Bethlehem, and both support the doctrine of the virgin birth of Jesus, according to which Jesus was miraculously conceived by the Holy Spirit in Mary’s womb when she was still a virgin.[112][113][114] At the same time, there is evidence, at least in the Lukan Acts of the Apostles, that Jesus was thought to have had, like many figures in antiquity, a dual paternity, since there it is stated he descended from the seed or loins of David.[115] By taking him as his own, Joseph will give him the necessary Davidic descent.[116]

In Matthew, Joseph is troubled because Mary, his betrothed, is pregnant,[117] but in the first of Joseph’s four dreams an angel assures him not to be afraid to take Mary as his wife, because her child was conceived by the Holy Spirit.[118] In Matthew 2:1–12, wise men or Magi from the East bring gifts to the young Jesus as the King of the Jews. They find him in a house in Bethlehem. Matthew focuses on an event after the Luke Nativity where Jesus was an infant. In Matthew Herod the Great hears of Jesus’ birth and, wanting him killed, orders the murders of male infants in Bethlehem under age of 2. But an angel warns Joseph in his second dream, and the family flees to Egypt—later to return and settle in Nazareth.[118][119][120]

In Luke 1:31–38, Mary learns from the angel Gabriel that she will conceive and bear a child called Jesus through the action of the Holy Spirit.[110][112] When Mary is due to give birth, she and Joseph travel from Nazareth to Joseph’s ancestral home in Bethlehem to register in the census ordered by Caesar Augustus. While there Mary gives birth to Jesus, and as they have found no room in the inn, she places the newborn in a manger.[121] An angel announces the birth to a group of shepherds, who go to Bethlehem to see Jesus, and subsequently spread the news abroad.[122] Luke 2:21 tells how Joseph and Mary have their baby circumcised on the eighth day after birth, and name him Jesus, as Gabriel had commanded Mary.[123] After the presentation of Jesus at the Temple, Joseph, Mary and Jesus return to Nazareth.[110][112]

Early life, family, and profession

Jesus’ childhood home is identified in the Gospels of Luke and Matthew as the town of Nazareth in Galilee, where he lived with his family. Although Joseph appears in descriptions of Jesus’ childhood, no mention is made of him thereafter.[124][better source needed] His other family members—his mother, Mary, his brothers James, Joses (or Joseph), Judas and Simon and his unnamed sisters—are mentioned in the Gospels and other sources.[125] Jesus’ maternal grandparents are named Joachim and Anne in the Gospel of James.[126] The Gospel of Luke records that Mary was a relative of Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist.[127] Non-biblical contemporary sources consider Jesus and John the Baptist to be second cousins through the belief that Elizabeth was the daughter of Sobe, the sister of Anne.[128][129][130]

The Gospel of Mark reports that at the beginning of his ministry, Jesus comes into conflict with his neighbors and family.[131] Jesus’ mother and brothers come to get him[132] because people are saying that he is crazy.[133] Jesus responds that his followers are his true family. In the Gospel of John, Jesus and his mother attend a wedding at Cana, where he performs his first miracle at her request.[134] Later, she follows him to his crucifixion, and he expresses concern over her well-being.[135]

Jesus is called a τέκτων (tektōn) in Mark 6:3, traditionally understood as carpenter but it could cover makers of objects in various materials, including builders.[136][137] The Gospels indicate that Jesus could read, paraphrase, and debate scripture, but this does not necessarily mean that he received formal scribal training.[138]

When Jesus is presented as a baby in the Temple in Jerusalem per Jewish Law, a man named Simeon says to Mary and Joseph that Jesus «shall stand as a sign of contradiction, while a sword will pierce your own soul. Then the secret thoughts of many will come to light.»[139] When Jesus, at the age of twelve, goes missing on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, his parents find him in the temple sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking questions, and the people are amazed at his understanding and answers; Mary scolds Jesus for going missing, to which Jesus replies that he must «be in his father’s house».[140]

Baptism and temptation

The synoptic gospels describe Jesus’ baptism in the Jordan River and the temptations he received while spending forty days in the Judaean Desert, as a preparation for his public ministry.[141] The accounts of Jesus’ baptism are all preceded by information about John the Baptist.[142][143][144] They show John preaching penance and repentance for the remission of sins and encouraging the giving of alms to the poor[145] as he baptizes people in the area of the Jordan River around Perea and foretells the arrival of someone «more powerful» than he.[146][147]

In the Gospel of Mark, John the Baptist baptizes Jesus, and as he comes out of the water he sees the Holy Spirit descending to him like a dove and a voice comes from heaven declaring him to be God’s Son.[148] This is one of two events described in the Gospels where a voice from Heaven calls Jesus «Son», the other being the Transfiguration.[149][150] The spirit then drives him into the wilderness where he is tempted by Satan.[151] Jesus then begins his ministry in Galilee after John’s arrest.[152]

In the Gospel of Matthew, as Jesus comes to him to be baptized, John protests, saying, «I need to be baptized by you.»[153] Jesus instructs him to carry on with the baptism «to fulfill all righteousness».[154] Matthew details three temptations that Satan offers Jesus in the wilderness.[155]

In the Gospel of Luke, the Holy Spirit descends as a dove after everyone has been baptized and Jesus is praying.[156] Later John implicitly recognizes Jesus from prison after sending his followers to ask about him.[157] Luke also describes three temptations received by Jesus in the wilderness, before starting his ministry in Galilee.[158]

The Gospel of John leaves out Jesus’ baptism and temptation.[159] Here, John the Baptist testifies that he saw the Spirit descend on Jesus.[160][161] John publicly proclaims Jesus as the sacrificial Lamb of God, and some of John’s followers become disciples of Jesus.[85] Before John is imprisoned, Jesus leads his followers to baptize disciples as well,[162] and they baptize more people than John.[163]

Public ministry

The Synoptics depict two distinct geographical settings in Jesus’ ministry. The first takes place north of Judea, in Galilee, where Jesus conducts a successful ministry, and the second shows Jesus rejected and killed when he travels to Jerusalem.[21] Often referred to as «rabbi»,[21] Jesus preaches his message orally.[26] Notably, Jesus forbids those who recognize him as the messiah to speak of it, including people he heals and demons he exorcises (see Messianic Secret).[164]

John depicts Jesus’ ministry as largely taking place in and around Jerusalem, rather than in Galilee; and Jesus’ divine identity is openly proclaimed and immediately recognized.[98]

Scholars divide the ministry of Jesus into several stages. The Galilean ministry begins when Jesus returns to Galilee from the Judaean Desert after rebuffing the temptation of Satan. Jesus preaches around Galilee, and in Matthew 4:18–20, his first disciples, who will eventually form the core of the early Church, encounter him and begin to travel with him.[144][165] This period includes the Sermon on the Mount, one of Jesus’ major discourses,[165][166] as well as the calming of the storm, the feeding of the 5,000, walking on water and a number of other miracles and parables.[167] It ends with the Confession of Peter and the Transfiguration.[168][169]

As Jesus travels towards Jerusalem, in the Perean ministry, he returns to the area where he was baptized, about a third of the way down from the Sea of Galilee along the Jordan River.[170][171][172] The final ministry in Jerusalem begins with Jesus’ triumphal entry into the city on Palm Sunday.[173] In the Synoptic Gospels, during that week Jesus drives the money changers from the Second Temple and Judas bargains to betray him. This period culminates in the Last Supper and the Farewell Discourse.[142][173][174]

Disciples and followers

The Exhortation to the Apostles, by James Tissot, portrays Jesus talking to his 12 disciples.

Near the beginning of his ministry, Jesus appoints twelve apostles. In Matthew and Mark, despite Jesus only briefly requesting that they join him, Jesus’ first four apostles, who were fishermen, are described as immediately consenting, and abandoning their nets and boats to do so.[175] In John, Jesus’ first two apostles were disciples of John the Baptist. The Baptist sees Jesus and calls him the Lamb of God; the two hear this and follow Jesus.[176][177] In addition to the Twelve Apostles, the opening of the passage of the Sermon on the Plain identifies a much larger group of people as disciples.[178] Also, in Luke 10:1–16 Jesus sends 70 or 72 of his followers in pairs to prepare towns for his prospective visit. They are instructed to accept hospitality, heal the sick, and spread the word that the Kingdom of God is coming.[179]

In Mark, the disciples are notably obtuse. They fail to understand Jesus’ miracles,[180] his parables,[181] or what «rising from the dead» means.[182] When Jesus is later arrested, they desert him.[164]

Teachings and miracles

In the Synoptics, Jesus teaches extensively, often in parables,[183] about the Kingdom of God (or, in Matthew, the Kingdom of Heaven). The Kingdom is described as both imminent[184] and already present in the ministry of Jesus.[185] Jesus promises inclusion in the Kingdom for those who accept his message.[186] He talks of the «Son of Man», an apocalyptic figure who will come to gather the chosen.[41]

Jesus calls people to repent their sins and to devote themselves completely to God.[41] He tells his followers to adhere to Jewish law, although he is perceived by some to have broken the law himself, for example regarding the Sabbath.[41] When asked what the greatest commandment is, Jesus replies: «You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind … And a second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.«[187] Other ethical teachings of Jesus include loving your enemies, refraining from hatred and lust, turning the other cheek, and forgiving people who have sinned against you.[188][189]

John’s Gospel presents the teachings of Jesus not merely as his own preaching, but as divine revelation. John the Baptist, for example, states in John 3:34: «He whom God has sent speaks the words of God, for he gives the Spirit without measure.» In John 7:16 Jesus says, «My teaching is not mine but his who sent me.» He asserts the same thing in John 14:10: «Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own; but the Father who dwells in me does his works.»[190][191]

Approximately 30 parables form about one-third of Jesus’ recorded teachings.[190][192] The parables appear within longer sermons and at other places in the narrative.[193] They often contain symbolism, and usually relate the physical world to the spiritual.[194][195] Common themes in these tales include the kindness and generosity of God and the perils of transgression.[196] Some of his parables, such as the Prodigal Son,[197] are relatively simple, while others, such as the Growing Seed,[198] are sophisticated, profound and abstruse.[199] When asked by his disciples why he speaks in parables to the people, Jesus replies that the chosen disciples have been given to «know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven», unlike the rest of their people, «For the one who has will be given more and he will have in abundance. But the one who does not have will be deprived even more», going on to say that the majority of their generation have grown «dull hearts» and thus are unable to understand.[200]

In the gospel accounts, Jesus devotes a large portion of his ministry by performing miracles, especially healings.[201] The miracles can be classified into two main categories: healing miracles and nature miracles.[202] The healing miracles include cures for physical ailments, exorcisms,[91][203] and resurrections of the dead.[204] The nature miracles show Jesus’ power over nature, and include turning water into wine, walking on water, and calming a storm, among others. Jesus states that his miracles are from a divine source. When his opponents suddenly accuse him of performing exorcisms by the power of Beelzebul, the prince of demons, Jesus counters that he performs them by the «Spirit of God» (Matthew 12:28) or «finger of God», arguing that all logic suggests that Satan would not let his demons assist the Children of God because it would divide Satan’s house and bring his kingdom to desolation; furthermore, he asks his opponents that if he exorcises by Beel’zebub, «by whom do your sons cast them out?»[205][206][207] In Matthew 12:31–32, he goes on to say that while all manner of sin, «even insults against God» or «insults against the son of man», shall be forgiven, whoever insults goodness (or «The Holy Spirit») shall never be forgiven; they carry the guilt of their sin forever.

In John, Jesus’ miracles are described as «signs», performed to prove his mission and divinity.[208][209] In the Synoptics, when asked by some teachers of the Law and some Pharisees to give miraculous signs to prove his authority, Jesus refuses,[208] saying that no sign shall come to corrupt and evil people except the sign of the prophet Jonah. Also, in the Synoptic Gospels, the crowds regularly respond to Jesus’ miracles with awe and press on him to heal their sick. In John’s Gospel, Jesus is presented as unpressured by the crowds, who often respond to his miracles with trust and faith.[210] One characteristic shared among all miracles of Jesus in the gospel accounts is that he performed them freely and never requested or accepted any form of payment.[211] The gospel episodes that include descriptions of the miracles of Jesus also often include teachings, and the miracles themselves involve an element of teaching.[212][213] Many of the miracles teach the importance of faith. In the cleansing of ten lepers and the raising of Jairus’s daughter, for instance, the beneficiaries are told that their healing was due to their faith.[214][215]

Proclamation as Christ and Transfiguration

At about the middle of each of the three Synoptic Gospels are two significant events: the Confession of Peter and the Transfiguration of Jesus.[169][216][149][150] These two events are not mentioned in the Gospel of John.[217]

In his Confession, Peter tells Jesus, «You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.»[218][219][220] Jesus affirms that Peter’s confession is divinely revealed truth.[221][222] After the confession, Jesus tells his disciples about his upcoming death and resurrection.[223]

In the Transfiguration,[224][149][150][169] Jesus takes Peter and two other apostles up an unnamed mountain, where «he was transfigured before them, and his face shone like the sun, and his clothes became dazzling white.»[225] A bright cloud appears around them, and a voice from the cloud says, «This is my Son, the Beloved; with him I am well pleased; listen to him.»[226][149]

Passion Week

The description of the last week of the life of Jesus (often called Passion Week) occupies about one-third of the narrative in the canonical gospels,[102] starting with Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem and ending with his Crucifixion.[142][173]

Activities in Jerusalem

In the Synoptics, the last week in Jerusalem is the conclusion of the journey through Perea and Judea that Jesus began in Galilee.[173] Jesus rides a young donkey into Jerusalem, reflecting the tale of the Messiah’s Donkey, an oracle from the Book of Zechariah in which the Jews’ humble king enters Jerusalem this way.[227][69] People along the way lay cloaks and small branches of trees (known as palm fronds) in front of him and sing part of Psalms 118:25-26.[228][229][230][231]

Jesus next expels the money changers from the Second Temple, accusing them of turning it into a den of thieves through their commercial activities. He then prophecies about the coming destruction, including false prophets, wars, earthquakes, celestial disorders, persecution of the faithful, the appearance of an «abomination of desolation», and unendurable tribulations.[232] The mysterious «Son of Man», he says, will dispatch angels to gather the faithful from all parts of the earth.[233] Jesus warns that these wonders will occur in the lifetimes of the hearers.[234][164] In John, the Cleansing of the Temple occurs at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry instead of at the end.[235][98]

Jesus comes into conflict with the Jewish elders, such as when they question his authority and when he criticizes them and calls them hypocrites.[229][231] Judas Iscariot, one of the twelve apostles, secretly strikes a bargain with the Jewish elders, agreeing to betray Jesus to them for 30 silver coins.[236][237]

The Gospel of John recounts of two other feasts in which Jesus taught in Jerusalem before the Passion Week.[238][131] In Bethany, a village near Jerusalem, Jesus raises Lazarus from the dead. This potent sign[98] increases the tension with authorities,[173] who conspire to kill him.[239][131] Mary of Bethany anoints Jesus’ feet, foreshadowing his entombment.[240] Jesus then makes his Messianic entry into Jerusalem.[131]
The cheering crowds greeting Jesus as he enters Jerusalem add to the animosity between him and the establishment.[173] In John, Jesus has already cleansed the Second Temple during an earlier Passover visit to Jerusalem. John next recounts Jesus’ Last Supper with his disciples.[131]

Last Supper

The Last Supper is the final meal that Jesus shares with his twelve apostles in Jerusalem before his crucifixion. The Last Supper is mentioned in all four canonical gospels; Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians[241] also refers to it.[54][55][242] During the meal, Jesus predicts that one of his apostles will betray him.[243] Despite each Apostle’s assertion that he would not betray him, Jesus reiterates that the betrayer would be one of those present. Matthew 26:23–25 and John 13:26–27 specifically identify Judas as the traitor.[54][55][243]

In the Synoptics, Jesus takes bread, breaks it, and gives it to the disciples, saying, «This is my body, which is given for you». He then has them all drink from a cup, saying, «This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood,»[244][54][245] The Christian sacrament or ordinance of the Eucharist is based on these events.[246] Although the Gospel of John does not include a description of the bread-and-wine ritual during the Last Supper, most scholars agree that John 6:22–59 (the Bread of Life Discourse) has a eucharistic character and resonates with the institution narratives in the Synoptic Gospels and in the Pauline writings on the Last Supper.[247]

In all four gospels, Jesus predicts that Peter will deny knowledge of him three times before the rooster crows the next morning.[248][249] In Luke and John, the prediction is made during the Supper.[250] In Matthew and Mark, the prediction is made after the Supper; Jesus also predicts that all his disciples will desert him.[251][252] The Gospel of John provides the only account of Jesus washing his disciples’ feet after the meal.[119] John also includes a long sermon by Jesus, preparing his disciples (now without Judas) for his departure. Chapters 14–17 of the Gospel of John are known as the Farewell Discourse and are a significant source of Christological content.[253][254]

Agony in the Garden, betrayal, and arrest

In the Synoptics, Jesus and his disciples go to the garden Gethsemane, where Jesus prays to be spared his coming ordeal. Then Judas comes with an armed mob, sent by the chief priests, scribes and elders. He kisses Jesus to identify him to the crowd, which then arrests Jesus. In an attempt to stop them, an unnamed disciple of Jesus uses a sword to cut off the ear of a man in the crowd. After Jesus’ arrest, his disciples go into hiding, and Peter, when questioned, thrice denies knowing Jesus. After the third denial, Peter hears the rooster crow and recalls Jesus’ prediction about his denial. Peter then weeps bitterly.[252][164][248]

In John 18:1–11, Jesus does not pray to be spared his crucifixion, as the gospel portrays him as scarcely touched by such human weakness.[255] The people who arrest him are Roman soldiers and Temple guards.[256] Instead of being betrayed by a kiss, Jesus proclaims his identity, and when he does, the soldiers and officers fall to the ground. The gospel identifies Peter as the disciple who used the sword, and Jesus rebukes him for it.

Trials by the Sanhedrin, Herod, and Pilate

After his arrest, Jesus is taken late at night to the private residence of the high priest, Caiaphas, who had been installed by Pilate’s predecessor, the Roman procurator Valerius Gratus.[257] The Sanhedrin was a Jewish judicial body,[258] The gospel accounts differ on the details of the trials.[259] In Matthew 26:57, Mark 14:53 and Luke 22:54, Jesus is taken to the house of the high priest, Caiaphas, where he is mocked and beaten that night. Early the next morning, the chief priests and scribes lead Jesus away into their council.[260][261][262] John 18:12–14 states that Jesus is first taken to Annas, Caiaphas’s father-in-law, and then to the high priest.[260][261][262]

During the trials Jesus speaks very little, mounts no defense, and gives very infrequent and indirect answers to the priests’ questions, prompting an officer to slap him. In Matthew 26:62, Jesus’ unresponsiveness leads Caiaphas to ask him, «Have you no answer?»[260][261][262] In Mark 14:61 the high priest then asks Jesus, «Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?» Jesus replies, «I am», and then predicts the coming of the Son of Man.[41] This provokes Caiaphas to tear his own robe in anger and to accuse Jesus of blasphemy. In Matthew and Luke, Jesus’ answer is more ambiguous:[41][263] in Matthew 26:64 he responds, «You have said so», and in Luke 22:70 he says, «You say that I am».[264][265]

The Jewish elders take Jesus to Pilate’s Court and ask the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, to judge and condemn Jesus for various allegations: subverting the nation, opposing the payment of tribute, claiming to be Christ, a King, and claiming to be the son of God.[266][262] The use of the word «king» is central to the discussion between Jesus and Pilate. In John 18:36 Jesus states, «My kingdom is not from this world», but he does not unequivocally deny being the King of the Jews.[267][268] In Luke 23:7–15, Pilate realizes that Jesus is a Galilean, and thus comes under the jurisdiction of Herod Antipas, the Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea.[269][270] Pilate sends Jesus to Herod to be tried,[271] but Jesus says almost nothing in response to Herod’s questions. Herod and his soldiers mock Jesus, put an expensive robe on him to make him look like a king, and return him to Pilate,[269] who then calls together the Jewish elders and announces that he has «not found this man guilty».[271]

Observing a Passover custom of the time, Pilate allows one prisoner chosen by the crowd to be released. He gives the people a choice between Jesus and a murderer called Barabbas (בר-אבא or Bar-abbâ, «son of the father», from the common given name Abba: ‘father’).[272] Persuaded by the elders,[273] the mob chooses to release Barabbas and crucify Jesus.[274] Pilate writes a sign in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek that reads «Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews» (abbreviated as INRI in depictions) to be affixed to Jesus’ cross,[275][276] then scourges Jesus and sends him to be crucified. The soldiers place a crown of thorns on Jesus’ head and ridicule him as the King of the Jews. They beat and taunt him before taking him to Calvary,[277] also called Golgotha, for crucifixion.[260][262][278]

Crucifixion and entombment

Jesus’ crucifixion is described in all four canonical gospels. After the trials, Jesus is led to Calvary carrying his cross; the route traditionally thought to have been taken is known as the Via Dolorosa. The three Synoptic Gospels indicate that Simon of Cyrene assists him, having been compelled by the Romans to do so.[279][280] In Luke 23:27–28, Jesus tells the women in the multitude of people following him not to weep for him but for themselves and their children.[279] At Calvary, Jesus is offered a sponge soaked in a concoction usually offered as a painkiller. According to Matthew and Mark, he refuses it.[279][280]

The soldiers then crucify Jesus and cast lots for his clothes. Above Jesus’ head on the cross is Pilate’s inscription, «Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews». Soldiers and passersby mock him about it. Two convicted thieves are crucified along with Jesus. In Matthew and Mark, both thieves mock Jesus. In Luke, one of them rebukes Jesus, while the other defends him.[279][281][282] Jesus tells the latter: «today you will be with me in Paradise.»[283] The four gospels mention the presence of a group of female disciples of Jesus at the crucifixion. In John, Jesus sees his mother Mary and the beloved disciple and tells him to take care of her.[284]

In John 19:33-34, Roman soldiers break the two thieves’ legs to hasten their death, but not those of Jesus, as he is already dead. Instead, one soldier pierces Jesus’ side with a lance, and blood and water flow out.[281] The Synoptics report a period of darkness, and the heavy curtain in the Temple is torn when Jesus dies. In Matthew 27:51–54, an earthquake breaks open tombs. In Matthew and Mark, terrified by the events, a Roman centurion states that Jesus was the Son of God.[279][285]

On the same day, Joseph of Arimathea, with Pilate’s permission and with Nicodemus’s help, removes Jesus’ body from the cross, wraps him in a clean cloth, and buries him in his new rock-hewn tomb.[279] In Matthew 27:62–66, on the following day the chief Jewish priests ask Pilate for the tomb to be secured, and with Pilate’s permission the priests place seals on the large stone covering the entrance.[279][286]

Resurrection and ascension

The Gospels do not describe the moment of the resurrection of Jesus. They describe the discovery of his empty tomb and several appearances of Jesus, with distinct differences in each narrative.[287]

In the four Gospels, Mary Magdalene goes to the tomb on Sunday morning, alone or with one or several other women.[288] The tomb is empty, with the stone rolled away, and there are one or two angels, depending on the accounts. In the Synoptics, the women are told that Jesus is not here and that he is risen.[289] In Mark and Matthew, the angel also instructs them to tell the disciples to meet Jesus in Galilee.[290] In Luke, Peter visits the tomb after he is told it is empty.[291] In John, he goes there with the beloved disciple.[292] Matthew mentions Roman guards at the tomb,[293] who report to the priests of Jerusalem what happened. The priests bribe them to say that the disciples stole Jesus’ body during the night.[294]

The four Gospels then describe various appearances of Jesus in his resurrected body. Jesus first reveals himself to Mary Magdalene in Mark 16:9 and John 20:14-17,[295] along with «the other Mary» in Matthew 28:9,[296] while in Luke the first reported appearance is to two disciples heading to Emmaus.[297] Jesus then reveals himself to the eleven disciples, in Jerusalem or in Galilee.[298] In Luke 24:36-43, he eats and shows them his tangible wounds to prove that he is not a spirit.[299] He also shows them to Thomas to end his doubts, in John 20:24-29.[300] In the Synoptics, Jesus commissions the disciples to spread the gospel message to all nations,[119][301] while in John 21, he tells Peter to take care of his sheep.[61][302]

Jesus’ ascension into Heaven is described in Luke 24:50–53, Acts 1:1–11 and mentioned in 1 Timothy 3:16. In the Acts of the Apostles, forty days after the Resurrection, as the disciples look on, «he was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight». 1 Peter 3:22 states that Jesus has «gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God».[61]

The Acts of the Apostles describes several appearances of Jesus after his Ascension. In Acts 7:55, Stephen gazes into heaven and sees «Jesus standing at the right hand of God» just before his death.[303] On the road to Damascus, the Apostle Paul is converted to Christianity after seeing a blinding light and hearing a voice saying, «I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.»[304] In Acts 9:10–18, Jesus instructs Ananias of Damascus in a vision to heal Paul.[305] The Book of Revelation includes a revelation from Jesus concerning the last days of Earth.[306]

Early Christianity

After Jesus’ life, his followers, as described in the first chapters of the Acts of the Apostles, were all Jews either by birth or conversion, for which the biblical term «proselyte» is used,[307] and referred to by historians as Jewish Christians. The early Gospel message was spread orally, probably in Aramaic,[308] but almost immediately also in Greek.[309] The New Testament’s Acts of the Apostles and Epistle to the Galatians record that the first Christian community was centered in Jerusalem and its leaders included Peter, James, the brother of Jesus, and John the Apostle.[310]

After his conversion, Paul the Apostle spread the teachings of Jesus to various non-Jewish communities throughout the eastern Mediterranean region. Paul’s influence on Christian thinking is said to be more significant than that of any other New Testament author.[311] By the end of the 1st century, Christianity began to be recognized internally and externally as a separate religion from Judaism which itself was refined and developed further in the centuries after the destruction of the Second Temple.[312]

Numerous quotations in the New Testament and other Christian writings of the first centuries, indicate that early Christians generally used and revered the Hebrew Bible (the Tanakh) as religious text, mostly in the Greek (Septuagint) or Aramaic (Targum) translations.[313]

Early Christians wrote many religious works, including the ones included in the canon of the New Testament. The canonical texts, which have become the main sources used by historians to try to understand the historical Jesus and sacred texts within Christianity, were probably written between 50 and 120 AD.[314]

Historical views

Prior to the Enlightenment, the Gospels were usually regarded as accurate historical accounts, but since then scholars have emerged who question the reliability of the Gospels and draw a distinction between the Jesus described in the Gospels and the Jesus of history.[315] Since the 18th century, three separate scholarly quests for the historical Jesus have taken place, each with distinct characteristics and based on different research criteria, which were often developed during the quest that applied them.[91][316] While there is widespread scholarly agreement on the existence of Jesus,[e] and a basic consensus on the general outline of his life,[n] the portraits of Jesus constructed by various scholars often differ from each other, and from the image portrayed in the gospel accounts.[318][319]

Approaches to the historical reconstruction of the life of Jesus have varied from the «maximalist» approaches of the 19th century, in which the gospel accounts were accepted as reliable evidence wherever it is possible, to the «minimalist» approaches of the early 20th century, where hardly anything about Jesus was accepted as historical.[320] In the 1950s, as the second quest for the historical Jesus gathered pace, the minimalist approaches faded away, and in the 21st century, minimalists such as Price are a very small minority.[321][322] Although a belief in the inerrancy of the Gospels cannot be supported historically, many scholars since the 1980s have held that, beyond the few facts considered to be historically certain, certain other elements of Jesus’ life are «historically probable».[321][323][324] Modern scholarly research on the historical Jesus thus focuses on identifying the most probable elements.[325][326]

Judea and Galilee in the 1st century

In AD 6, Judea, Idumea, and Samaria were transformed from a Herodian client kingdom of the Roman Empire into an imperial province, also called Judea. A Roman prefect, rather than a client king, ruled the land. The prefect ruled from Caesarea Maritima, leaving Jerusalem to be run by the High Priest of Israel. As an exception, the prefect came to Jerusalem during religious festivals, when religious and patriotic enthusiasm sometimes inspired unrest or uprisings. Gentile lands surrounded the Jewish territories of Judea and Galilee, but Roman law and practice allowed Jews to remain separate legally and culturally. Galilee was evidently prosperous, and poverty was limited enough that it did not threaten the social order.[41]

This was the era of Hellenistic Judaism, which combined Jewish religious tradition with elements of Hellenistic Greek culture. Until the fall of the Western Roman Empire and the Muslim conquests of the Eastern Mediterranean, the main centers of Hellenistic Judaism were Alexandria (Egypt) and Antioch (now Southern Turkey), the two main Greek urban settlements of the Middle East and North Africa area, both founded at the end of the 4th century BCE in the wake of the conquests of Alexander the Great. Hellenistic Judaism also existed in Jerusalem during the Second Temple Period, where there was conflict between Hellenizers and traditionalists (sometimes called Judaizers). The Hebrew Bible was translated from Biblical Hebrew and Biblical Aramaic into Jewish Koine Greek; the Targum translations into Aramaic were also generated during this era, both due to the decline of knowledge of Hebrew.[327]

Jews based their faith and religious practice on the Torah, five books said to have been given by God to Moses. The three prominent religious parties were the Pharisees, the Essenes, and the Sadducees. Together these parties represented only a small fraction of the population. Most Jews looked forward to a time that God would deliver them from their pagan rulers, possibly through war against the Romans.[41]

Sources

A 1640 edition of the works of Josephus, a 1st-century Roman-Jewish historian who referred to Jesus[328]

New Testament scholars face a formidable challenge when they analyze the canonical Gospels.[329]
The Gospels are not biographies in the modern sense, and the authors explain Jesus’ theological significance and recount his public ministry while omitting many details of his life.[329]
The reports of supernatural events associated with Jesus’ death and resurrection make the challenge even more difficult.[329]
Scholars regard the Gospels as compromised sources of information because the writers were trying to glorify Jesus.[81]
Even so, the sources for Jesus’ life are better than sources scholars have for the life of Alexander the Great.[81]
Scholars use a number of criteria, such as the criterion of independent attestation, the criterion of coherence, and the criterion of discontinuity to judge the historicity of events.[330] The historicity of an event also depends on the reliability of the source; indeed, the Gospels are not independent nor consistent records of Jesus’ life. Mark, which is most likely the earliest written gospel, has been considered for many decades the most historically accurate.[331] John, the latest written gospel, differs considerably from the Synoptic Gospels, and thus is generally considered less reliable, although more and more scholars now also recognize that it may contain a core of older material as historically valuable as the Synoptic tradition or even more so.[332]

Some scholars (most notably the Jesus Seminar) believe that the non-canonical Gospel of Thomas might be an independent witness to many of Jesus’ parables and aphorisms. For example, Thomas confirms that Jesus blessed the poor and that this saying circulated independently before being combined with similar sayings in the Q source.[333] However, the majority of scholars are skeptical about this text and believe it should be dated to the 2nd century CE instead.[334][335]

Other select non-canonical Christian texts may also have value for historical Jesus research.[85]

Early non-Christian sources that attest to the historical existence of Jesus include the works of the historians Josephus and Tacitus.[o][328][337] Josephus scholar Louis Feldman has stated that «few have doubted the genuineness» of Josephus’s reference to Jesus in book 20 of the Antiquities of the Jews, and it is disputed only by a small number of scholars.[338][339] Tacitus referred to Christ and his execution by Pilate in book 15 of his work Annals. Scholars generally consider Tacitus’s reference to the execution of Jesus to be both authentic and of historical value as an independent Roman source.[340]

Non-Christian sources are valuable in two ways. First, they show that even neutral or hostile parties never show any doubt that Jesus actually existed. Second, they present a rough picture of Jesus that is compatible with that found in the Christian sources: that Jesus was a teacher, had a reputation as a miracle worker, had a brother James, and died a violent death.[341]

Archaeology helps scholars better understand Jesus’ social world.[342] Recent archaeological work, for example, indicates that Capernaum, a city important in Jesus’ ministry, was poor and small, without even a forum or an agora.[343][344] This archaeological discovery resonates well with the scholarly view that Jesus advocated reciprocal sharing among the destitute in that area of Galilee.[343]

Chronology

Jesus was a Galilean Jew,[10] born around the beginning of the 1st century, who died in 30 or 33 AD in Judea.[345] The general scholarly consensus is that Jesus was a contemporary of John the Baptist and was crucified as ordered by the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, who held office from 26 to 36 AD.[22]

The Gospels offer several indications concerning the year of Jesus’ birth. Matthew 2:1 associates the birth of Jesus with the reign of Herod the Great, who died around 4 BC, and Luke 1:5 mentions that Herod was on the throne shortly before the birth of Jesus,[346][347] although this gospel also associates the birth with the Census of Quirinius which took place ten years later.[348][349] Luke 3:23 states that Jesus was «about thirty years old» at the start of his ministry, which according to Acts 10:37–38 was preceded by John the Baptist’s ministry, which was recorded in Luke 3:1–2 to have begun in the 15th year of Tiberius’s reign (28 or 29 AD).[347][350] By collating the gospel accounts with historical data and using various other methods, most scholars arrive at a date of birth for Jesus between 6 and 4 BC,[350][351] but some propose estimates that include a wider range.[p]

The date range for Jesus’ ministry has been estimated using several different approaches.[352][353] One of these applies the reference in Luke 3:1–2, Acts 10:37–38, and the dates of Tiberius’s reign, which are well known, to give a date of around 28–29 AD for the start of Jesus’ ministry.[354] Another approach estimates a date around 27–29 AD by using the statement about the temple in John 2:13–20, which asserts that the temple in Jerusalem was in its 46th year of construction at the start of Jesus’ ministry, together with Josephus’s statement[355] that the temple’s reconstruction was started by Herod the Great in the 18th year of his reign.[352][356] A further method uses the date of the death of John the Baptist and the marriage of Herod Antipas to Herodias, based on the writings of Josephus, and correlates it with Matthew 14:4 and Mark 6:18.[357][358] Given that most scholars date the marriage of Herod and Herodias as AD 28–35, this yields a date about 28–29 AD.[353]

A number of approaches have been used to estimate the year of the crucifixion of Jesus. Most scholars agree that he died in 30 or 33 AD.[345][359] The Gospels state that the event occurred during the prefecture of Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea from 26 to 36 AD.[360][361][362] The date for the conversion of Paul (estimated to be 33–36 AD) acts as an upper bound for the date of Crucifixion. The dates for Paul’s conversion and ministry can be determined by analyzing the Pauline epistles and the Acts of the Apostles.[363][364] Astronomers have tried to estimate the precise date of the Crucifixion by analyzing lunar motion and calculating historic dates of Passover, a festival based on the lunisolar Hebrew calendar. The most widely accepted dates derived from this method are 7 April 30 AD, and 3 April 33 AD (both Julian).[365]

Historicity of events

Roman senator and historian Tacitus (pictured left) mentioned the execution of «Christus» (Jesus) by Pilate in a passage describing the Great Fire of Rome and Nero’s persecution of Christians in the Annals, a history of the Roman Empire during the 1st century.

Nearly all historical scholars agree that Jesus was a real person who historically existed.[e] Scholars have reached a limited consensus on the basics of Jesus’ life.[366]

Family

Many scholars agree that Joseph, Jesus’ father, died before Jesus began his ministry. Joseph is not mentioned at all in the Gospels during Jesus’ ministry. Joseph’s death would explain why in Mark 6:3, Jesus’ neighbors refer to Jesus as the «son of Mary» (sons were usually identified by their fathers).[367]

According to Theissen and Merz, it is common for extraordinary charismatic leaders, such as Jesus, to come into conflict with their ordinary families.[368] In Mark, Jesus’ family comes to get him, fearing that he is mad (Mark 3:20–34), and this account is thought to be historical because early Christians would likely not have invented it.[369] After Jesus’ death, many members of his family joined the Christian movement.[368] Jesus’ brother James became a leader of the Jerusalem Church.[370]

Géza Vermes says that the doctrine of the virgin birth of Jesus arose from theological development rather than from historical events.[371]
Despite the widely held view that the authors of the Synoptic Gospels drew upon each other (the so-called synoptic problem), other scholars take it as significant that the virgin birth is attested by two separate gospels, Matthew and Luke.[372][373][374][375][376][377]

According to E. P. Sanders, the birth narratives in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke are the clearest case of invention in the Gospel narratives of Jesus’ life. Both accounts have Jesus born in Bethlehem, in accordance with Jewish salvation history, and both have him growing up in Nazareth. But Sanders points that the two Gospels report completely different and irreconcilable explanations for how that happened. Luke’s account of a census in which everyone returned to their ancestral cities is not plausible. Matthew’s account is more plausible, but the story reads as though it was invented to identify Jesus as like a new Moses, and the historian Josephus reports Herod the Great’s brutality without ever mentioning that he massacred little boys.[378] The contradictions between the two Gospels was probably apparent to the early Christians already, since attempts to harmonize the two narratives are already present in the earlier apocryphal infancy gospels (the Infancy Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of James), which are dated to the 2nd century CE.[379][380]

Sanders says that the genealogies of Jesus are based not on historical information but on the authors’ desire to show that Jesus was the universal Jewish savior.[105] In any event, once the doctrine of the virgin birth of Jesus became established, that tradition superseded the earlier tradition that he was descended from David through Joseph.[381] The Gospel of Luke reports that Jesus was a blood relative of John the Baptist, but scholars generally consider this connection to be invented.[105][382]

Baptism

Baptism in the Jordan River, the river where Jesus was baptized

Most modern scholars consider Jesus’ baptism to be a definite historical fact, along with his crucifixion.[6] Theologian James D. G. Dunn states that they «command almost universal assent» and «rank so high on the ‘almost impossible to doubt or deny’ scale of historical facts» that they are often the starting points for the study of the historical Jesus.[6] Scholars adduce the criterion of embarrassment, saying that early Christians would not have invented a baptism that might imply that Jesus committed sins and wanted to repent.[383][384] According to Theissen and Merz, Jesus was inspired by John the Baptist and took over from him many elements of his teaching.[385]

Ministry in Galilee

Most scholars hold that Jesus lived in Galilee and Judea and did not preach or study elsewhere.[386] They agree that Jesus debated with Jewish authorities on the subject of God, performed some healings, taught in parables and gathered followers.[22] Jesus’ Jewish critics considered his ministry to be scandalous because he feasted with sinners, fraternized with women, and allowed his followers to pluck grain on the Sabbath.[68] According to Sanders, it is not plausible that disagreements over how to interpret the Law of Moses and the Sabbath would have led Jewish authorities to want Jesus killed.[387]

According to Ehrman, Jesus taught that a coming kingdom was everyone’s proper focus, not anything in this life.[388] He taught about the Jewish Law, seeking its true meaning, sometimes in opposition to other traditions.[389] Jesus put love at the center of the Law, and following that Law was an apocalyptic necessity.[389] His ethical teachings called for forgiveness, not judging others, loving enemies, and caring for the poor.[390] Funk and Hoover note that typical of Jesus were paradoxical or surprising turns of phrase, such as advising one, when struck on the cheek, to offer the other cheek to be struck as well.[391][392]

The Gospels portray Jesus teaching in well-defined sessions, such as the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew or the parallel Sermon on the Plain in Luke. According to Gerd Theissen and Annette Merz, these teaching sessions include authentic teachings of Jesus, but the scenes were invented by the respective evangelists to frame these teachings, which had originally been recorded without context.[85] While Jesus’ miracles fit within the social context of antiquity, he defined them differently. First, he attributed them to the faith of those healed. Second, he connected them to end times prophecy.[393]

Jesus chose twelve disciples (the «Twelve»),[394] evidently as an apocalyptic message.[395] All three Synoptics mention the Twelve, although the names on Luke’s list vary from those in Mark and Matthew, suggesting that Christians were not certain who all the disciples were.[395] The twelve disciples might have represented the twelve original tribes of Israel, which would be restored once God’s rule was instituted.[395] The disciples were reportedly meant to be the rulers of the tribes in the coming Kingdom.[396][395] According to Bart Ehrman, Jesus’ promise that the Twelve would rule is historical, because the Twelve included Judas Iscariot. In Ehrman’s view, no Christians would have invented a line from Jesus, promising rulership to the disciple who betrayed him.[395]
In Mark, the disciples play hardly any role other than a negative one. While others sometimes respond to Jesus with complete faith, his disciples are puzzled and doubtful.[397] They serve as a foil to Jesus and to other characters.[397] The failings of the disciples are probably exaggerated in Mark, and the disciples make a better showing in Matthew and Luke.[397]

Sanders says that Jesus’ mission was not about repentance, although he acknowledges that this opinion is unpopular. He argues that repentance appears as a strong theme only in Luke, that repentance was John the Baptist’s message, and that Jesus’ ministry would not have been scandalous if the sinners he ate with had been repentant.[398] According to Theissen and Merz, Jesus taught that God was generously giving people an opportunity to repent.[399]

Role

Jesus taught that an apocalyptic figure, the «Son of Man», would soon come on clouds of glory to gather the elect, or chosen ones.[400] He referred to himself as a «son of man» in the colloquial sense of «a person», but scholars do not know whether he also meant himself when he referred to the heavenly «Son of Man». Paul the Apostle and other early Christians interpreted the «Son of Man» as the risen Jesus.[41]

The Gospels refer to Jesus not only as a messiah but in the absolute form as «the Messiah» or, equivalently, «the Christ». In early Judaism, this absolute form of the title is not found, but only phrases such as «his messiah». The tradition is ambiguous enough to leave room for debate as to whether Jesus defined his eschatological role as that of the messiah.[401] The Jewish messianic tradition included many different forms, some of them focused on a messiah figure and others not.[402] Based on the Christian tradition, Gerd Theissen advances the hypothesis that Jesus saw himself in messianic terms but did not claim the title «Messiah».[402] Bart Ehrman argues that Jesus did consider himself to be the messiah, albeit in the sense that he would be the king of the new political order that God would usher in,[403] not in the sense that most people today think of the term.[404]

Passover and crucifixion in Jerusalem

Around AD 30, Jesus and his followers traveled from Galilee to Jerusalem to observe Passover.[394] Jesus caused a disturbance in the Second Temple,[24] which was the center of Jewish religious and civil authority. Sanders associates it with Jesus’ prophecy that the Temple would be totally demolished.[405] Jesus held a last meal with his disciples, which is the origin of the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist. His words as recorded in the Synoptic gospels and Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians do not entirely agree, but this meal appears to have pointed to Jesus’ place in the coming Kingdom of God when very probably Jesus knew he was about to be killed, although he may have still hoped that God might yet intervene.[406]

The Gospels say that Jesus was betrayed to the authorities by a disciple, and many scholars consider this report to be highly reliable.[159] He was executed on the orders of Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect of Judaea.[24] Pilate most likely saw Jesus’ reference to the Kingdom of God as a threat to Roman authority and worked with the Temple elites to have Jesus executed.[407] The Sadducean high-priestly leaders of the Temple more plausibly had Jesus executed for political reasons than for his teaching.[159] They may have regarded him as a threat to stability, especially after he caused a disturbance at the Second Temple.[159][40] Other factors, such as Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem, may have contributed to this decision.[408] Most scholars consider Jesus’ crucifixion to be factual, because early Christians would not have invented the painful death of their leader.[6][409]

After crucifixion

The Resurrection of Christ from a 16th-century manuscript of La Passion de Nostre Seigneur

After Jesus’ death, his followers said he was restored to life, although exact details of their experiences are unclear. The gospel reports contradict each other, possibly suggesting competition among those claiming to have seen him first rather than deliberate fraud.[410] On the other hand, L. Michael White suggests that inconsistencies in the Gospels reflect differences in the agendas of their unknown authors.[366] The followers of Jesus formed a community to wait for his return and the founding of his kingdom.[24]

Portraits of Jesus

Modern research on the historical Jesus has not led to a unified picture of the historical figure, partly because of the variety of academic traditions represented by the scholars.[411] Given the scarcity of historical sources, it is generally difficult for any scholar to construct a portrait of Jesus that can be considered historically valid beyond the basic elements of his life.[82][83] The portraits of Jesus constructed in these quests often differ from each other, and from the image portrayed in the Gospels.[318][412]

Jesus is seen as the founder of, in the words of Sanders, a «renewal movement within Judaism». One of the criteria used to discern historical details in the «third quest» is the criterion of plausibility, relative to Jesus’ Jewish context and to his influence on Christianity. A disagreement in contemporary research is whether Jesus was apocalyptic. Most scholars conclude that he was an apocalyptic preacher, like John the Baptist and Paul the Apostle. In contrast, certain prominent North American scholars, such as Burton Mack and John Dominic Crossan, advocate for a non-eschatological Jesus, one who is more of a Cynic sage than an apocalyptic preacher.[413] In addition to portraying Jesus as an apocalyptic prophet, a charismatic healer or a cynic philosopher, some scholars portray him as the true messiah or an egalitarian prophet of social change.[414][415] However, the attributes described in the portraits sometimes overlap, and scholars who differ on some attributes sometimes agree on others.[416]

Since the 18th century, scholars have occasionally put forth that Jesus was a political national messiah, but the evidence for this portrait is negligible. Likewise, the proposal that Jesus was a Zealot does not fit with the earliest strata of the Synoptic tradition.[159]

Language, ethnicity, and appearance

The ethnicity of Jesus in art has been influenced by cultural settings.[417][418]

Jesus grew up in Galilee and much of his ministry took place there.[419] The languages spoken in Galilee and Judea during the 1st century AD include Jewish Palestinian Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek, with Aramaic being predominant.[420][421] There is substantial consensus that Jesus gave most of his teachings in Aramaic[422] in the Galilean dialect.[423][424]

Modern scholars agree that Jesus was a Jew of 1st-century Palestine.[425] Ioudaios in New Testament Greek[q] is a term which in the contemporary context may refer to religion (Second Temple Judaism), ethnicity (of Judea), or both.[427][428][429] In a review of the state of modern scholarship, Amy-Jill Levine writes that the entire question of ethnicity is «fraught with difficulty», and that «beyond recognizing that ‘Jesus was Jewish’, rarely does the scholarship address what being ‘Jewish’ means».[430]

The New Testament gives no description of the physical appearance of Jesus before his death—it is generally indifferent to racial appearances and does not refer to the features of the people it mentions.[431][432][433] Jesus probably looked like a typical Jewish man of his time and place; standing around 166 cm (5 ft 5 in) tall with a thin but fit build, olive-brown skin, brown eyes and short, dark hair. He also likely had a beard that was not particularly long or heavy.[434] His clothing may have suggested poverty consisting of a mantle (shawl) with tassels, a knee-length basic tunic and sandals.[435]

Christ myth theory

The Christ myth theory is the hypothesis that Jesus of Nazareth never existed; or if he did, that he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity and the accounts in the gospels.[r] Stories of Jesus’ birth, along with other key events, have so many mythic elements that some scholars have suggested that Jesus himself was a myth.[437]Bruno Bauer (1809–1882) taught that the first Gospel was a work of literature that produced history rather than described it.[438]
According to Albert Kalthoff (1850–1906), a social movement produced Jesus when it encountered Jewish messianic expectations.[438]Arthur Drews (1865–1935) saw Jesus as the concrete form of a myth that predated Christianity.[438]

Despite arguments put forward by authors who have questioned the existence of a historical Jesus, virtually all scholars of antiquity accept that Jesus was a historical figure and consider Christ myth theory fringe.[439][440][441][442][443][444][445]

Religious perspectives

Apart from his own disciples and followers,[446] the Jews of Jesus’ day generally rejected him as the messiah,[447] as does Judaism today.[448] Christian theologians, ecumenical councils, reformers and others have written extensively about Jesus over the centuries. Christian denominations have often been defined or characterized by their descriptions of Jesus. Meanwhile, Manichaeans, Gnostics, Muslims, Druzes,[35] the Baháʼí Faith, and others, have found prominent places for Jesus in their religions.[449][450][451]

Christian

Jesus is the central figure of Christianity.[95] Although Christian views of Jesus vary, it is possible to summarize the key beliefs shared among major denominations, as stated in their catechetical or confessional texts.[452][453][454] Christian views of Jesus are derived from the texts of the New Testament, including the canonical gospels and letters such as the Pauline epistles and the Johannine writings. These documents outline the key beliefs held by Christians about Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and earthly life, and that he is the Christ and the Son of God.[455] Despite their many shared beliefs, not all Christian denominations agree on all doctrines, and both major and minor differences on teachings and beliefs have persisted throughout Christianity for centuries.[456]

The New Testament states that the resurrection of Jesus is the foundation of the Christian faith.[457][458] Christians believe that through his sacrificial death and resurrection, humans can be reconciled with God and are thereby offered salvation and the promise of eternal life.[29] Recalling the words of John the Baptist in the gospel of John, these doctrines sometimes refer to Jesus as the Lamb of God, who was crucified to fulfill his role as the servant of God.[459][460] Jesus is thus seen as the new and last Adam, whose obedience contrasts with Adam’s disobedience.[461] Christians view Jesus as a role model, whose God-focused life believers are encouraged to imitate.[95]

At present, most Christians believe that Jesus is both human and the Son of God.[462] While there has been theological debate over his nature,[s] Trinitarian Christians generally believe that Jesus is the Logos, God’s incarnation and God the Son, both fully divine and fully human. However, the doctrine of the Trinity is not universally accepted among Christians.[464][465] With the Reformation, Christians such as Michael Servetus and the Socinians started questioning the ancient creeds that had established Jesus’ two natures.[41] Nontrinitarian Christian groups include the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,[466] Unitarians and Jehovah’s Witnesses.[463]

Christians revere not only Jesus himself, but also his name. Devotions to the Holy Name of Jesus go back to the earliest days of Christianity.[467][468] These devotions and feasts exist in both Eastern and Western Christianity.[468]

Jewish

Judaism rejects the idea of Jesus (or any future Jewish messiah) being God,[40] or a mediator to God, or part of a Trinity.[469] It holds that Jesus is not the messiah, arguing that he neither fulfilled the Messianic prophecies in the Tanakh nor embodied the personal qualifications of the Messiah.[470] Jews argue that Jesus did not fulfill prophesies to build the Third Temple,[471] gather Jews back to Israel,[472] bring world peace,[473] and unite humanity under the God of Israel.[474][475] Furthermore, according to Jewish tradition, there were no prophets after Malachi,[476] who delivered his prophesies in the 5th century BC.[477]

Judaic criticism of Jesus is long-standing, and includes a range of stories in the Talmud, written and compiled from the 3rd to the 5th century AD.[478] In one such story, Yeshu HaNozri («Jesus the Nazarene»), a lewd apostate, is executed by the Jewish high court for spreading idolatry and practicing magic.[479] According to some, the form Yeshu is an acronym which in Hebrew reads: «may his name and memory be blotted out.»[480] The majority of contemporary scholars consider that this material provides no information on the historical Jesus.[481] The Mishneh Torah, a late 12th-century work of Jewish law written by Moses Maimonides, states that Jesus is a «stumbling block» who makes «the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the Lord».[482]

Medieval Hebrew literature contains the anecdotal «Episode of Jesus» (known also as Toledot Yeshu), in which Jesus is described as being the son of Joseph, the son of Pandera (see: Episode of Jesus). The account portrays Jesus as an impostor.[483]

Manichaeism

Manichaeism was the first organised religion outside of Christianity to venerate Jesus.[484][485][486] He is considered one of the four prophets, along with Zoroaster, Gautama Buddha and Mani.[487][488]

Islam

A major figure in Islam,[489][490] Jesus (often referred to by his Quranic name ʿĪsā) is considered to be a messenger of God (Allāh) and the messiah (al-Masīḥ) who was sent to guide the Children of Israel (Banī Isrāʾīl) with a new scripture, the Gospel (referred to in Islam as Injīl).[36][491] Muslims regard the gospels’ accounts in the New Testament as partially authentic, and believe that Jesus’ original message was altered (taḥrīf) and that Muhammad came later to revive it.[492] Belief in Jesus (and all other messengers of God) is a requirement for being a Muslim.[493] The Quran mentions Jesus by name 25 times—more often than Muhammad[494][495]—and emphasizes that Jesus was a mortal human who, like all other prophets, had been divinely chosen to spread God’s message.[496] While the Quran affirms the Virgin birth of Jesus, he is considered to be neither an incarnation nor a son of God. Islamic texts emphasize a strict notion of monotheism (tawḥīd) and forbid the association of partners with God, which would be idolatry.[497]

The Quran describes the annunciation to Mary (Maryam) by the Holy Spirit that she is to give birth to Jesus while remaining a virgin. It calls the virgin birth a miracle that occurred by the will of God.[498][499] The Quran (Q21:91 and Q66:12) states that God breathed his spirit into Mary while she was chaste.[498][499] Jesus is called a «spirit from God» because he was born through the action of the Spirit,[498] but that belief does not imply his pre-existence.[500]

To aid in his ministry to the Jewish people, Jesus was given the ability to perform miracles, by permission of God rather than by his own power.[39] Through his ministry, Jesus is seen as a precursor to Muhammad.[496] In the Quran (Q4:157–159) it is said that Jesus was not killed but was merely made to appear that way to unbelievers,[501] and that he was raised into the heavens while still alive by God.[502] According to most classic Sunni and Twelver Shi’ite interpretations of these verses, the likeness of Jesus was cast upon a substitute (most often one of the apostles), who was crucified in Jesus’ stead.[503] However, some medieval Muslims (among others, the ghulāt writing under the name of al-Mufaddal ibn Umar al-Ju’fi, the Brethren of Purity, various Isma’ili philosophers, and the Sunni mystic al-Ghazali) affirmed the historicity of Jesus’ crucifixion. These thinkers held the docetic view that, although Jesus’ human form (his body) had died on the cross, his true divine nature (his spirit) had survived and ascended into heaven, so that his death was only an appearance.[504] Nevertheless, to Muslims it is the ascension rather than the crucifixion that constitutes a major event in the life of Jesus.[505] There is no mention of his resurrection on the third day, and his death plays no special role in Islamic theories of salvation.[506] However, Jesus is a central figure in Islamic eschatology: Muslims believe that he will return to Earth at the end of time and defeat the Antichrist (ad-Dajjal) by killing him.[36]

According to the Quran, the coming of Muhammad was predicted by Jesus: «And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: ‘O children of Israel! I am God’s messenger to you, confirming the law (which came) before me, and giving glad tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad'» (Quran 61:6). Through this verse, early Arab Muslims claimed legitimacy for their new faith in the existing religious traditions and the alleged predictions of Jesus.[507]

Ahmadiyya Islam

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community has several distinct teachings about Jesus.[508] Ahmadis believe that he was a mortal man who survived his crucifixion and died a natural death at the age of 120 in Kashmir, India, and is buried at Roza Bal.[509]

Druze faith

In the Druze faith, Jesus is considered and revered as one of the seven spokesmen or prophets (natiq), defined as messengers or intermediaries between God and mankind, along with Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Muhammad and Muhammad ibn Isma’il, each of them sent in different period of history to preach the message of God.[35][510][511][512][513]

Baháʼí faith

In the Baháʼí Faith, Jesus is considered one of the Manifestations of God, defined as divine messengers or prophets sent by God to guide humanity, along with other religious figures such as Abraham, Moses, Krishna, Zarathushtra, Buddha, Muhammad and Baháʼu’lláh. Baháʼís believe that these religious founders or leaders have contributed to the progressive revelation by bringing spiritual and moral values to humanity in their own time and place.[514][515][516][517][518] As a Manifestation of God, Jesus is believed to reflect God’s qualities and attributes, but is not considered the only savior of humanity nor the incarnation of God.[519][520][521] Baháʼís believe in the virgin birth,[522][523] but see the resurrection and the miracles of Jesus as symbolic.[524][523]

Other

Enthroned Jesus image on a Manichaean temple banner from c. 10th-century Qocho

In Christian Gnosticism (now a largely extinct religious movement),[525] Jesus was sent from the divine realm and provided the secret knowledge (gnosis) necessary for salvation. Most Gnostics believed that Jesus was a human who became possessed by the spirit of «the Christ» at his baptism. This spirit left Jesus’ body during the crucifixion, but was rejoined to him when he was raised from the dead. Some Gnostics, however, were docetics, believed that Jesus did not have a physical body, but only appeared to possess one.[526]

Some Hindus consider Jesus to be an avatar or a sadhu.[527] Paramahansa Yogananda, an Indian guru, taught that Jesus was the reincarnation of Elisha and a student of John the Baptist, the reincarnation of Elijah.[528] Some Buddhists, including Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, regard Jesus as a bodhisattva who dedicated his life to the welfare of people.[529] The New Age movement entertains a wide variety of views on Jesus.[530] Theosophists, from whom many New Age teachings originated,[531] refer to Jesus as the Master Jesus, a spiritual reformer, and they believe that Christ, after various incarnations, occupied the body of Jesus.[532] The Urantia Book teaches Jesus is one of more than 700,000 heavenly sons of God.[533] Antony Theodore in the book Jesus Christ in Love writes that there is an underlying oneness of Jesus’ teachings with the messages contained in Quran, Vedas, Upanishads, Talmud and Avesta.[534] Atheists reject Jesus’ divinity, but have different views about him – from challenging his mental health[535][536] to emphasizing his «moral superiority» (Richard Dawkins).[537]

Artistic depictions

Jesus healing a paralytic in one of the first known images of Jesus from Dura Europos in the 3rd century.[538]

Some of the earliest depictions of Jesus at the Dura-Europos church are firmly dated to before 256.[539] Thereafter, despite the lack of biblical references or historical records, a wide range of depictions of Jesus appeared during the last two millennia, often influenced by cultural settings, political circumstances and theological contexts.[417][418][432] As in other Early Christian art, the earliest depictions date to the late 2nd or early 3rd century, and surviving images are found especially in the Catacombs of Rome.[540]

The depiction of Christ in pictorial form was highly controversial in the early Church.[541][t][542] From the 5th century onward, flat painted icons became popular in the Eastern Church.[543] The Byzantine Iconoclasm acted as a barrier to developments in the East, but by the 9th century, art was permitted again.[417] The Protestant Reformation brought renewed resistance to imagery, but total prohibition was atypical, and Protestant objections to images have tended to reduce since the 16th century. Although large images are generally avoided, few Protestants now object to book illustrations depicting Jesus.[544][545] The use of depictions of Jesus is advocated by the leaders of denominations such as Anglicans and Catholics[546][547][548] and is a key element of the Eastern Orthodox tradition.[549][550]

In Eastern Christian art, the Transfiguration was a major theme, and every Eastern Orthodox monk who had trained in icon painting had to prove his craft by painting an icon depicting it.[551] Icons receive the external marks of veneration, such as kisses and prostration, and they are thought to be powerful channels of divine grace.[543]

In Western Europe, the Renaissance brought forth a number of artists who focused on depictions of Jesus; Fra Angelico and others followed Giotto in the systematic development of uncluttered images.[417] Before the Protestant Reformation, the crucifix was common in Western Christianity. It is a model of the cross with Jesus crucified on it. The crucifix became the central ornament of the altar in the 13th century, a use that has been nearly universal in Roman Catholic churches since then.[552]

Associated relics

The Shroud of Turin, Italy, is the best-known claimed relic of Jesus and one of the most studied artifacts in human history.

The total destruction that ensued with the siege of Jerusalem by the Romans in AD 70 made the survival of items from 1st-century Judea very rare and almost no direct records survive about the history of Judaism from the last part of the 1st century through the 2nd century.[553][554][u] Margaret M. Mitchell writes that although Eusebius reports (Ecclesiastical History III 5.3) that the early Christians left Jerusalem for Pella just before Jerusalem was subjected to the final lockdown, we must accept that no first-hand Christian items from the early Jerusalem Church have reached us.[556] Joe Nickell writes, «as investigation after investigation has shown, not a single, reliably authenticated relic of Jesus exists.»[557][v]

However, throughout the history of Christianity, a number of relics attributed to Jesus have been claimed, although doubt has been cast on them. The 16th-century Catholic theologian Erasmus wrote sarcastically about the proliferation of relics and the number of buildings that could have been constructed from the wood claimed to be from the cross used in the Crucifixion.[560] Similarly, while experts debate whether Jesus was crucified with three nails or with four, at least thirty holy nails continue to be venerated as relics across Europe.[561]

Some relics, such as purported remnants of the crown of thorns placed on the head of Jesus, receive only a modest number of pilgrims, while the Shroud of Turin (which is associated with an approved Catholic devotion to the Holy Face of Jesus), has received millions,[562] including popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI.[563][564]

See also

  • Outline of Jesus
  • Jesuism
  • Jesus in comparative mythology
  • Jesus in Islam
  • Jesus in the Talmud
  • Language of Jesus
  • Last Adam
  • Liminal deity
  • List of books about Jesus
  • List of founders of religious traditions
  • List of messiah claimants
  • List of people claimed to be Jesus
  • List of people who have been considered deities
  • List of statues of Jesus
  • Sexuality of Jesus
  • Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera

Notes

  1. ^ John P. Meier writes that Jesus’ birth year is c. 7 or 6 BC.[1] Karl Rahner states that the consensus among Christian scholars is c. 4 BC.[2] E. P. Sanders also favors c. 4 BC and refers to the general consensus.[3] Jack Finegan uses the study of early Christian traditions to support c. 3 or 2 BC.[4]
  2. ^ James Dunn writes that the baptism and crucifixion of Jesus «command almost universal assent» and «rank so high on the ‘almost impossible to doubt or deny’ scale of historical facts» that they are often the starting points for the study of the historical Jesus.[6] Bart Ehrman states that the crucifixion of Jesus on the orders of Pontius Pilate is the most certain element about him.[7] John Dominic Crossan and Richard G. Watts state that the crucifixion of Jesus is as certain as any historical fact can be.[8] Paul R. Eddy and Gregory A. Boyd say that non-Christian confirmation of the crucifixion of Jesus is now «firmly established».[9]
  3. ^ Traditionally, Christians believe that Mary conceived her son miraculously by the agency of the Holy Spirit. Muslims believe that she conceived her son miraculously by the command of God. Joseph was from these perspectives the acting adoptive father of Jesus.
  4. ^ Greek: Ἰησοῦς Iēsous, likely from Hebrew/Aramaic: יֵשׁוּעַ Yēšūaʿ
  5. ^ a b c In a 2011 review of the state of modern scholarship, Bart Ehrman wrote, «He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees.»[11] Richard A. Burridge states: «There are those who argue that Jesus is a figment of the Church’s imagination, that there never was a Jesus at all. I have to say that I do not know any respectable critical scholar who says that any more.»[12] Robert M. Price does not believe that Jesus existed but agrees that this perspective runs against the views of the majority of scholars.[13] James D. G. Dunn calls the theories of Jesus’ non-existence «a thoroughly dead thesis».[14] Michael Grant (a classicist) wrote in 1977, «In recent years, ‘no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus’ or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary.»[15] Robert E. Van Voorst states that biblical scholars and classical historians regard theories of non-existence of Jesus as effectively refuted.[16] Writing on The Daily Beast, Candida Moss and Joel Baden state that «there is nigh universal consensus among biblical scholars – the authentic ones, at least – that Jesus was, in fact, a real guy.»[17]
  6. ^ Ehrman writes: «The notion that the Gospel accounts are not completely accurate but still important for the religious truths they try to convey is widely shared in the scholarly world, even though it’s not so widely known or believed outside of it.»[19]
    Sanders writes: «The earliest Christians did not write a narrative of Jesus’ life, but rather made use of, and thus preserved, individual units—short passages about his words and deeds. These units were later moved and arranged by authors and editors. … Some material has been revised and some created by early Christians.»[20]
  7. ^ A small minority of Christian denominations that reject trinitarianism, wholly or partly, as non-scriptural
  8. ^ Part of the Eastern Christian churches celebrate Christmas on 25 December of the Julian calendar, which currently corresponds to 7 January in the Gregorian calendar. In many countries, Christmas is celebrated on 24 December.
  9. ^ Some medieval Muslims believed that Jesus was crucified, as do the members of the modern Ahmadiyya movement; see § Islamic perspectives.
  10. ^ This article uses quotes from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible.
  11. ^ Powell writes: «[Paul] does cite words or instructions of Jesus in a few places,[63] but for the most part he displays little interest in the details of Jesus’ earthly life and ministry.»[64]
  12. ^ Compare Matthew 1:6–16 with Luke 3:23–31. See also Genealogy of Jesus § Comparison of the two genealogies.
  13. ^ For an overview of such theories, see Genealogy of Jesus § Explanations for divergence.
  14. ^ Amy-Jill Levine writes: «There is a consensus of sorts on a basic outline of Jesus’ life. Most scholars agree that Jesus was baptized by John, debated with fellow Jews on how best to live according to God’s will, engaged in healings and exorcisms, taught in parables, gathered male and female followers in Galilee, went to Jerusalem, and was crucified by Roman soldiers during the governorship of Pontius Pilate»[317]
  15. ^ Tuckett writes: «All this does at least render highly implausible any far-fetched theories that even Jesus’ very existence was a Christian invention. The fact that Jesus existed, that he was crucified under Pontius Pilate (for whatever reason) and that he had a band of followers who continued to support his cause, seems to be part of the bedrock of historical tradition. If nothing else, the non-Christian evidence can provide us with certainty on that score.»[336]
  16. ^ For example, John P. Meier states that Jesus’ birth year is c. 7/6 BC,[1] while Finegan favors c. 3/2 BC.[4]
  17. ^ In the New Testament, Jesus is described as Jewish / Judean (Ioudaios as written in Koine Greek) on three occasions: by the Magi in Matthew 2, who referred to Jesus as «King of the Jews» (basileus ton ioudaion); by both the Samaritan woman at the well and by Jesus himself in John 4; and (in all four gospels) during the Passion, by the Romans, who also used the phrase «King of the Jews».[426]
  18. ^ Ehrman writes: «In simpler terms, the historical Jesus did not exist. Or if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity.» Further quoting as authoritative the fuller definition provided by Earl Doherty in Jesus: Neither God Nor Man. Age of Reason, 2009, pp. vii–viii: it is «the theory that no historical Jesus worthy of the name existed, that Christianity began with a belief in a spiritual, mythical figure, that the Gospels are essentially allegory and fiction, and that no single identifiable person lay at the root of the Galilean preaching tradition.»[436]
  19. ^ Following the Apostolic Age, there was fierce and often politicized debate in the early church on many interrelated issues. Christology was a major focus of these debates, and was addressed at every one of the first seven ecumenical councils. Some early beliefs viewed Jesus as ontologically subordinate to the Father (Subordinationism), and others considered him an aspect of the Father rather than a separate person (Sabellianism), both were condemned as heresies by the Catholic Church.[41][463] The Church resolved the issues in ancient councils, which established the Holy Trinity, with Jesus both fully human and fully God.[41]
  20. ^ Philip Schaff commenting on Irenaeus, wrote, ‘This censure of images as a Gnostic peculiarity, and as a heathenish corruption, should be noted’. Footnote 300 on Contr. Her. .I.XXV.6. ANF
  21. ^ Flavius Josephus writing (about 5 years later, c. AD 75) in The Jewish War (Book VII 1.1) stated that Jerusalem had been flattened to the point that «there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited.»[555] And once what was left of the ruins of Jerusalem had been turned into the Roman settlement of Aelia Capitolina, no Jews were allowed to set foot in it.[554]
  22. ^ Polarized conclusions regarding the Shroud of Turin remain.[558] According to former Nature editor Philip Ball, «it’s fair to say that, despite the seemingly definitive tests in 1988, the status of the Shroud of Turin is murkier than ever. Not least, the nature of the image and how it was fixed on the cloth remain deeply puzzling».[559]

References

Citations

  1. ^ a b Meier 1991, p. 407.
  2. ^ Rahner 2004, p. 732.
  3. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 10–11.
  4. ^ a b Finegan 1998, p. 319
  5. ^ Brown 1977, p. 513.
  6. ^ a b c d Dunn 2003, p. 339.
  7. ^ Ehrman 1999, p. 101.
  8. ^ Crossan & Watts 1999, p. 96.
  9. ^ Eddy & Boyd 2007, p. 173.
  10. ^ a b c d Vermes 1981, pp. 20, 26, 27, 29.
  11. ^ Ehrman 2011, p. 285.
  12. ^ Burridge, Richard A.; Gould, Graham (2004). Jesus Now and Then. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-8028-0977-3.
  13. ^ Price, Robert M. (2009). «Jesus at the Vanishing Point». In Beilby, James K.; Eddy, Paul R. (eds.). The Historical Jesus: Five Views. InterVarsity. pp. 55, 61. ISBN 978-0-8308-7853-6. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  14. ^ Sykes, Stephen W. (2007). «Paul’s understanding of the death of Jesus». Sacrifice and Redemption. Cambridge University Press. pp. 35–36. ISBN 978-0-521-04460-8.
  15. ^ Grant, Michael (1977). Jesus: An Historian’s Review of the Gospels. Scribner’s. p. 200. ISBN 978-0-684-14889-2.
  16. ^ Van Voorst 2000, p. 16.
  17. ^ Baden, Candida Moss (5 October 2014). «So-Called ‘Biblical Scholar’ Says Jesus a Made-Up Myth». The Daily Beast.
  18. ^ Powell 1998, pp. 168–73.
  19. ^ Bart D. Ehrman. Historical Jesus. ‘Prophet of the New Millennium’. Archived 23 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine Course handbook, p. 10 (Lecture Three. V. B.) The Teaching Company, 2000, Lecture 24
  20. ^ Sanders 1993, p. 57.
  21. ^ a b c James Orr, ed. (1939). «International Standard Bible Encyclopedia Online». Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 30 July 2016.
  22. ^ a b c d Levine 2006, p. 4.
  23. ^ Charlesworth, James H. (2008). The Historical Jesus: An Essential Guide. p. 113. ISBN 978-1-4267-2475-6. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  24. ^ a b c d Sanders 1993, p. 11.
  25. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 11, 14.
  26. ^ a b Dunn, James D.G. (2013). The Oral Gospel Tradition. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 290–91.
  27. ^ Grudem 1994, pp. 568–603.
  28. ^ Wilhelm, Joseph (1911). «The Nicene Creed». The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 11. Robert Appleton Company. Archived from the original on 17 April 2016. Retrieved 11 April 2016.
  29. ^ a b Metzger, Bruce M.; Coogan, Michael D. (1993). Oxford Companion to the Bible. Oxford University Press. p. 649. ISBN 978-0-19-974391-9.
  30. ^ Tabor, James (22 March 2013). «What the Bible Says About Death, Afterlife, and the Future». UNCC. Archived from the original on 23 August 2016. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
  31. ^ Hoekema, Anthony A. (1994). The Bible and the Future. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 88–89. ISBN 978-0-85364-624-2. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  32. ^ Garrett, James L. (2014). Systematic Theology, Volume 2, Second Edition: Biblical, Historical, and Evangelical. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 766. ISBN 978-1-62564-852-5. Archived from the original on 25 January 2020. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
  33. ^ «Who is Christ to Baha’is?». 13 June 2014.
  34. ^ a b c Hitti, Philip K. (1928). The Origins of the Druze People and Religion: With Extracts from Their Sacred Writings. Library of Alexandria. p. 37. ISBN 978-1-4655-4662-3.
  35. ^ a b c Glassé, Cyril (2008). Concise Encyclopedia of Islam. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 270–71. ISBN 978-0-7425-6296-7. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  36. ^ «Surah Al-Kahf — 4». quran.com. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  37. ^ «Surah Al-Kahf — 5». quran.com. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  38. ^ a b Morgan, Diane (2010). Essential Islam: A Comprehensive Guide to Belief and Practice. ABC-CLIO. pp. 45–46. ISBN 978-0-313-36025-1.
  39. ^ a b c Jacobs, Joseph; Kohler, Kaufmann; Gottheil, Richard; Krauss, Samuel. «Jesus of Nazareth». Jewish Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 26 February 2016. See Avodah Zarah 17a:1, Sanhedrin 43a:20, Gittin 57a:3-4, and Sotah 47a:6.
  40. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Sanders, E. P.; Pelikan, Jaroslav J. «Jesus Christ». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 3 May 2015. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
  41. ^ a b Hare 1993, p. 11.
  42. ^ Matthew 1:21
  43. ^ Doninger 1999, p. 212.
  44. ^ Pannenberg 1968, pp. 30–31.
  45. ^ Bultmann, Rudolf K. (2007). Theology of the New Testament. Baylor University Press. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-932792-93-5.
  46. ^ Maas, Anthony J. (1913). «Origin of the Name of Jesus Christ» . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  47. ^ Heil, John P. (2010). Philippians: Let Us Rejoice in Being Conformed to Christ. Society of Biblical Lit. p. 66. ISBN 978-1-58983-482-8. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  48. ^ Vine 1940, pp. 274–75.
  49. ^ See Leviticus 8:10–12 and Exodus 30:29.
  50. ^ Mills & Bullard 1998, p. 142.
  51. ^ 1 Corinthians 11:23–26
  52. ^ Blomberg 2009, pp. 441–42.
  53. ^ a b c d Fahlbusch, Erwin (2005). The Encyclopedia of Christianity. Vol. 4. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 53–56. ISBN 978-0-8028-2416-5. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  54. ^ a b c Evans 2003, pp. 465–77.
  55. ^ Acts 10:37–38 and Acts 19:4
  56. ^ Bruce, Frederick F. (1988). The Book of the Acts. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 362. ISBN 978-0-8028-2505-6.
  57. ^ Rausch 2003, p. 77.
  58. ^ Acts 1:1–11
  59. ^ also mentioned in 1 Timothy 3:16
  60. ^ a b c Evans 2003, pp. 521–30.
  61. ^ 1 Corinthians 7:10–11, 9:14, 11:23–25, 2 Corinthians 12:9
  62. ^ 1 Cor. 7:10–11; 9:14; 11:23–25; 2 Cor. 12:9; cf. Acts 20:35
  63. ^ Powell, Mark A. (2009). Introducing the New Testament. Baker Academic. p. 248. ISBN 9780801028687.
  64. ^ Brown 1997, pp. 835–40.
  65. ^ Evans, C.A. (2008). Exploring the Origins of the Bible. Baker Academic. p. 154.
  66. ^ Keener 2009, p. 56.
  67. ^ a b c d e Funk, Hoover & The Jesus Seminar 1993, p. 3.
  68. ^ a b c d May, Herbert G. and Bruce M. Metzger. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha. 1977. «Mark» pp. 1213–39
  69. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, John, St..
  70. ^ Roberts, Mark D. (2007). Can We Trust the Gospels?: Investigating the Reliability of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Crossway. p. 58. ISBN 978-1-4335-1978-9. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  71. ^ Licona 2010, pp. 210–21.
  72. ^ Burridge, R.A. (2006). Gospels. In J.W. Rogerson & Judith M. Lieu (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 433
  73. ^ Talbert, C.H. (1977). What is a Gospel? The Genre of the Canonical Gospels. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
  74. ^ Wills, L.M. (1997). The Quest of the Historical Gospel: Mark, John and the Origins of the Gospel Genre. London: Routledge. p. 10.
  75. ^ Burridge, R.A. (2004). What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. rev. updated edn. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.
  76. ^ e.g. Vines, M.E. (2002). The Problem of the Markan Genre: The Gospel of Mark and the Jewish Novel. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. pp. 161–62.
  77. ^ Graham N. Stanton (8 July 2004). Jesus and Gospel. Cambridge University Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-521-00802-0. Archived from the original on 26 February 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  78. ^ J.W. Rogerson; Judith M. Lieu (16 March 2006). The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies. Oxford University Press. p. 437. ISBN 978-0-19-925425-5. Archived from the original on 25 December 2019. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  79. ^ Grudem 1994, pp. 90–91.
  80. ^ a b c d Sanders 1993, p. 3.
  81. ^ a b Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, pp. 117–25.
  82. ^ a b Ehrman 1999, pp. 22–23.
  83. ^ Sanders 1993, p. 71.
  84. ^ a b c d Theissen & Merz 1998, pp. 17–62.
  85. ^ a b Haffner, Paul (2008). New Testament Theology. p. 135. ISBN 978-88-902268-0-9.
  86. ^ a b Scroggie, W. Graham (1995). A Guide to the Gospels. Kregel Publications. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-8254-9571-7.
  87. ^ «synoptic». Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  88. ^ «Synoptic Gospels | Definition & Facts». Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  89. ^ Moloney, Francis J.; Harrington, Daniel J. (1998). The Gospel of John. Liturgical Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-8146-5806-2.
  90. ^ a b c Witherington 1997, p. 113.
  91. ^ Ladd, George E. (1993). A Theology of the New Testament. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 251. ISBN 978-0-8028-0680-2. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  92. ^ a b c d Thompson, Frank Charles. The Thompson Chain-Reference Bible. Kirk bride Bible Co & Zondervan Bible Publishers. 1983. pp. 1563–64.
  93. ^ May, Herbert G. and Bruce M. Metzger. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha. 1977. «Matthew» pp. 1171–1212.
  94. ^ a b c McGrath 2006, pp. 4–6.
  95. ^ a b May, Herbert G. and Bruce M. Metzger. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha. 1977. «Luke» pp. 1240–85.
  96. ^ a b May, Herbert G. and Bruce M. Metzger. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha. 1977. «John» pp. 1286–318.
  97. ^ a b c d Harris 1985, pp. 302–10.
  98. ^ a b Rahner 2004, pp. 730–31.
  99. ^ O’Collins, Gerald (2009). Christology: A Biblical, Historical, and Systematic Study of Jesus. OUP Oxford. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-0-19-955787-5.
  100. ^ a b Wiarda, Timothy (2010). Interpreting Gospel Narratives: Scenes, People, and Theology. B&H Publishing Group. pp. 75–78. ISBN 978-0-8054-4843-6.
  101. ^ a b Turner, David L. (2008). Matthew. Baker Academic. p. 613. ISBN 978-0-8010-2684-3.
  102. ^ Matthew 1; Luke 2
  103. ^ Matthew 1:1–16
  104. ^ a b c Sanders 1993, pp. 80–91.
  105. ^ Luke 3:23–38
  106. ^ Brown 1978, p. 163.
  107. ^ France, R.T. (1985). The Gospel According to Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary. Eerdmans. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-8028-0063-3. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 15 October 2018. «From David the two lists diverge, as Matthew follows the line of succession to the throne of Judah from Solomon, whereas Luke’s list goes through Nathan, … and converges with Matthew’s only for the two names of Shealtiel and Zerubabbel until Joseph is reached.»
  108. ^ Mills & Bullard 1998, p. 556.
  109. ^ a b c Marsh, Clive; Moyise, Steve (2006). Jesus and the Gospels. Clark International. p. 37. ISBN 978-0-567-04073-2. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  110. ^ Morris 1992, p. 26.
  111. ^ a b c Jeffrey, David L. (1992). A Dictionary of biblical tradition in English literature. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 538–40. ISBN 978-0-85244-224-1. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  112. ^ Cox & Easley 2007, pp. 30–37.
  113. ^ Brownrigg, Ronald (2002). Who’s Who in the New Testament. Taylor & Francis. pp. 96–100. ISBN 978-0-415-26036-7.
  114. ^ Andrew T.Lincoln, ‘Luke and Jesus’ Conception: A Case of Double Paternity?’, Archived 20 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 132, No. 3 (2013), pp. 639–58.
  115. ^ «Lincoln, Andrew T., «Conceiving Jesus: re-examining Jesus’ conception in canon, Christology, and creed», Th Severn Forum, 5 March 2015, p. 4″ (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 May 2020. Retrieved 2 July 2019.
  116. ^ Matthew 1:19–20
  117. ^ a b Talbert, Charles H. (2010). Matthew. Baker Academic. pp. 29–30. ISBN 978-0-8010-3192-2. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  118. ^ a b c Harris 1985, pp. 272–85.
  119. ^ Schnackenburg, Rudolf (2002). The Gospel of Matthew. Wm.B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 9–11. ISBN 978-0-8028-4438-5. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  120. ^ Luke 2:1–7
  121. ^ Luke 2:8–20
  122. ^ Luke 2:21
  123. ^ Perrotta, Louise B. (2000). Saint Joseph: His Life and His Role in the Church Today. Our Sunday Visitor Publishing. pp. 21, 110–12. ISBN 978-0-87973-573-9.
  124. ^ Aslan, Reza (2013). Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth. Random House. p. 756. ISBN 978-1-4000-6922-4.
  125. ^ Brownrigg, Ronald (2 September 2003). Who’s Who in the New Testament. New York: Routledge. p. 194. ISBN 978-1134509492.
  126. ^ Luke 1:5,36
  127. ^ PG 97.1325
  128. ^ PG 120.189
  129. ^ PG 145.760 (Nicephorus Callistus, Historia ecclesiastica, 2.3)
  130. ^ a b c d e Harris 1985, pp. 270–72.
  131. ^ Mark 3:31–35
  132. ^ Mark 3:21
  133. ^ John 3:1–11
  134. ^ John 19:25–27
  135. ^ Liddell, Henry G.; Scott, Robert (1889). An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon: The Seventh Edition of Liddell and Scott’s Greek–English Lexicon. Clarendon Press. p. 797.
  136. ^ Dickson 2008, pp. 68–69.
  137. ^ Evans, Craig A. (2001). «Context, family and formation». In Bockmuehl, Markus N.A. (ed.). Cambridge companion to Jesus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14, 21. ISBN 978-0-521-79678-1. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  138. ^ Luke 2:28–35
  139. ^ Luke 2:41–52
  140. ^ Sheen, Fulton J. (2008). Life of Christ. Random House. p. 65. ISBN 978-0-385-52699-9. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  141. ^ a b c Blomberg 2009, pp. 224–29.
  142. ^ Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, pp. 141–43.
  143. ^ a b McGrath 2006, pp. 16–22.
  144. ^ Luke 3:11
  145. ^ Luke 3:16
  146. ^ Dunn, James D. G.; Rogerson, John W. (2003). Eerdmans commentary on the Bible. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 1010. ISBN 978-0-8028-3711-0.
  147. ^ Mark 1:9–11
  148. ^ a b c d Lee 2004, pp. 21–30.
  149. ^ a b c Harding, Mark; Nobbs, Alanna (2010). The Content and the Setting of the Gospel Tradition. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 281–82. ISBN 978-0-8028-3318-1.
  150. ^ Mark 1:12–13
  151. ^ Mark 1:14
  152. ^ Matthew 3:14
  153. ^ Matthew 3:15
  154. ^ Matthew 4:3–11
  155. ^ Luke 3:21–22
  156. ^ Luke 7:18–23
  157. ^ Luke 4:1–14
  158. ^ a b c d e Cross & Livingstone 2005, Jesus Christ.
  159. ^ John 1:32
  160. ^ Boring & Craddock 2004, p. 292.
  161. ^ John 3:22–24
  162. ^ John 4:1
  163. ^ a b c d Harris 1985, pp. 285–96.
  164. ^ a b Redford 2007, pp. 117–30.
  165. ^ Vaught, Carl G. (2001). The Sermon on the mount: a theological investigation. Baylor University Press. pp. xi–xiv. ISBN 978-0-918954-76-3.
  166. ^ Redford 2007, pp. 143–60.
  167. ^ Nash, Henry S. (1909). «Transfiguration, The». In Jackson, Samuel M. (ed.). The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Thought: Son of Man-Tremellius V11. Funk & Wagnalls Company. p. 493. ISBN 978-1-4286-3189-2. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  168. ^ a b c Barton, Stephen C. (23 November 2006). The Cambridge Companion to the Gospels. Cambridge University Press. pp. 132–33. ISBN 978-0-521-80766-1.
  169. ^ John 10:40–42
  170. ^ Cox & Easley 2007, p. 137.
  171. ^ Redford 2007, pp. 211–29.
  172. ^ a b c d e f Cox & Easley 2007, pp. 155–70.
  173. ^ Redford 2007, pp. 257–74.
  174. ^ Matthew 4:18–22, Mark 1:16–20
  175. ^ Brown 1988, pp. 25–27.
  176. ^ Boring & Craddock 2004, pp. 292–93.
  177. ^ Luke 6:17
  178. ^ Patella, Michael F. (2009). «The Gospel According to Luke». In Durken, Daniel (ed.). New Collegeville Bible Commentary: New Testament. Liturgical Press. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-8146-3260-4. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  179. ^ Mark 4:35–41, Mark 6:52
  180. ^ Mark 4:13
  181. ^ Mark 9:9–10
  182. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, pp. 316–46.
  183. ^ Mark 1:15
  184. ^ Luke 17:21
  185. ^ Mark 10:13–27
  186. ^ Matthew 22:37–39
  187. ^ Matthew 5–7
  188. ^ Stassen, Glen H.; Gushee, David P. (2003). Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context. InterVarsity Press. pp. 102–03, 138–40, 197–98, 295–98. ISBN 978-0-8308-2668-1. Archived from the original on 26 February 2020. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  189. ^ a b Osborn, Eric F. (1993). The emergence of Christian theology. Cambridge University Press. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-521-43078-4.
  190. ^ Köstenberger, Andreas J. (1998). The missions of Jesus and the disciples according to the Fourth Gospel. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 108–09. ISBN 978-0-8028-4255-8.
  191. ^ Pentecost, J. Dwight (1998). The parables of Jesus: lessons in life from the Master Teacher. Kregel Publications. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-8254-9715-5.
  192. ^ Howick, E. Keith (2003). The Sermons of Jesus the Messiah. WindRiver Publishing. pp. 7–9. ISBN 978-1-886249-02-8.
  193. ^ Lisco, Friedrich G. (1850). The Parables of Jesus. Daniels and Smith Publishers. pp. 9–11.
  194. ^ Oxenden, Ashton (1864). The parables of our Lord?. William Macintosh Publishers. p. 6.
  195. ^ Blomberg, Craig L. (2012). Interpreting the Parables. InterVarsity Press. p. 448. ISBN 978-0-8308-3967-4. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  196. ^ Luke 15:11–32
  197. ^ Mark 4:26–29
  198. ^ Boucher, Madeleine I. «The Parables». BBC. Archived from the original on 10 August 2013. Retrieved 3 June 2013.
  199. ^ Matthew 13:10–17
  200. ^ Green, McKnight & Marshall 1992, p. 299.
  201. ^ Twelftree 1999, p. 350.
  202. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, p. 298.
  203. ^ Green, McKnight & Marshall 1992, p. 300.
  204. ^ Luke 11:20
  205. ^ Sanders, E. P.; Pelikan, Jaroslav J. «Jesus Christ». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 3 May 2015. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
  206. ^ Hindson, Edward E.; Mitchell, Daniel R. (2010). Zondervan King James Version Commentary: New Testament. Zondervan. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-310-25150-7. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  207. ^ a b Achtemeier, Paul J.; Green, Joel B.; Thompson, Marianne M. (2001). Introducing the New Testament: Its Literature and Theology. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 198. ISBN 978-0-8028-3717-2.
  208. ^ Ehrman 2009, p. 84.
  209. ^ Twelftree 1999, p. 236.
  210. ^ van der Loos, Hendrik (1965). The Miracles Of Jesus. Brill. p. 197. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  211. ^ Pentecost, J. Dwight (1981). The words and works of Jesus Christ. Zondervan. p. 212. ISBN 978-0-310-30940-6. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  212. ^ Twelftree 1999, p. 95.
  213. ^ Donahue & Harrington 2002, p. 182.
  214. ^ Lockyer, Herbert (1988). All the Miracles of the Bible. Zondervan. p. 235. ISBN 978-0-310-28101-6.
  215. ^ Kingsbury, Jack D. (1983). The Christology of Mark’s Gospel. Fortress Press. pp. 91–95. ISBN 978-1-4514-1007-5.
  216. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, John, Gospel of.
  217. ^ Karris, Robert J. (1992). The Collegeville Bible Commentary: New Testament. Liturgical Press. pp. 885–86. ISBN 978-0-8146-2211-7.
  218. ^ Kingsbury, Jack D.; Powell, Mark A.; Bauer, David R. (1999). Who do you say that I am? Essays on Christology. Westminster John Knox Press. p. xvi. ISBN 978-0-664-25752-1.
  219. ^ Donahue & Harrington 2002, p. 336.
  220. ^ Yieh, John Y. H. (2004). One teacher: Jesus’ teaching role in Matthew’s gospel. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 240–41. ISBN 978-3-11-018151-7. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  221. ^ Pannenberg 1968, pp. 53–54.
  222. ^ Matthew 16:21, Mark 8:31, Luke 9:22
  223. ^ Matthew 17:1–9, Mark 9:2–8, and Luke 9:28–36
  224. ^ Lee 2004, pp. 72–76.
  225. ^ Matthew 17:1–9
  226. ^ Zechariah 9:9
  227. ^ Psalms 118:25–26
  228. ^ a b Boring & Craddock 2004, pp. 256–58.
  229. ^ Majerník, Ponessa & Manhardt 2005, pp. 133–34.
  230. ^ a b Evans 2003, pp. 381–95.
  231. ^ Mark 13:1–23
  232. ^ Mark 13:24–27
  233. ^ Mark 13:28–32
  234. ^ John 2:13–16
  235. ^ Lockyer, Herbert (1988). All the Apostles of the Bible. Zondervan. pp. 106–11. ISBN 978-0-310-28011-8. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  236. ^ Hayes, Doremus A. (2009). The Synoptic Gospels and the Book of Acts. HardPress. p. 88. ISBN 978-1-313-53490-1.
  237. ^ John 7:1–10:42
  238. ^ John 11
  239. ^ Funk, Hoover & The Jesus Seminar 1993, pp. 401–470.
  240. ^ 11:23–26
  241. ^ Cox & Easley 2007, pp. 180–91.
  242. ^ a b Cox & Easley 2007, p. 182.
  243. ^ Luke 22:19–20
  244. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, Eucharist.
  245. ^ Pohle, Joseph (1913). «The Blessed Eucharist as a Sacrament» . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  246. ^ Freedman 2000, p. 792.
  247. ^ a b Perkins, Pheme (2000). Peter: apostle for the whole church. Fortress Press. p. 85. ISBN 978-1-4514-1598-8.
  248. ^ Lange, Johann P. (1865). The Gospel according to Matthew, Volume 1. Charles Scribner Co. p. 499.
  249. ^ Luke 22:34, John 22:34
  250. ^ Matthew 26:31–34, Mark 14:27–30
  251. ^ a b Walvoord & Zuck 1983, pp. 83–85.
  252. ^ O’Day, Gail R.; Hylen, Susan (2006). John. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 142–68. ISBN 978-0-664-25260-1.
  253. ^ Ridderbos, Herman (1997). The Gospel according to John. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 546–76. ISBN 978-0-8028-0453-2.
  254. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, Jesus.
  255. ^ Michaels, J. Ramsey (2011). John (Understanding the Bible Commentary Series). Baker Books. p. 187. ISBN 978-1-4412-3659-3. Archived from the original on 26 February 2020. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  256. ^ Josephus Antiquities 18.2.2
  257. ^ Brown 1997, p. 146.
  258. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (1988). International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: E–J. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 1050–52. ISBN 978-0-8028-3782-0. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  259. ^ a b c d Evans 2003, pp. 487–500.
  260. ^ a b c Blomberg 2009, pp. 396–400.
  261. ^ a b c d e Holman Concise Bible Dictionary. B&H Publishing Group. 2011. pp. 608–09. ISBN 978-0-8054-9548-5.
  262. ^ Evans 2003, p. 495.
  263. ^ Blomberg 2009, pp. 396–98.
  264. ^ O’Toole, Robert F. (2004). Luke’s presentation of Jesus: a christology. Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico. p. 166. ISBN 978-88-7653-625-0.
  265. ^ Matthew: «claiming to be king of the Jews». Mark: «king of the Jews». Luke: «subverting nation, opposing payment of taxes to Caesar, claiming to be Christ, a king» John: «breaking Jewish law, claiming to be the son of God».
  266. ^ Binz, Stephen J. (2004). The Names of Jesus. Twenty-Third Publications. pp. 81–82. ISBN 978-1-58595-315-8.
  267. ^ Ironside, H.A. (2006). John. Kregel Academic. p. 454. ISBN 978-0-8254-9619-6.
  268. ^ a b Niswonger 1992, p. 172.
  269. ^ Majerník, Ponessa & Manhardt 2005, p. 181.
  270. ^ a b Carter 2003, pp. 120–21.
  271. ^ Evans 2012b, p. 453.
  272. ^ Matthew 27:20
  273. ^ Blomberg 2009, pp. 400–01.
  274. ^ John 19:19–20
  275. ^ Brown 1988, p. 93.
  276. ^ Senior, Donald (1985). The Passion of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew. Liturgical Press. p. 124. ISBN 978-0-8146-5460-6.
  277. ^ Blomberg 2009, p. 402.
  278. ^ a b c d e f g Evans 2003, pp. 509–20.
  279. ^ a b Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, pp. 211–14.
  280. ^ a b Doninger 1999, p. 271.
  281. ^ Ehrman 2009, p. 82.
  282. ^ Luke 23:43
  283. ^ John 19:26–27
  284. ^ Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, pp. 213–14.
  285. ^ Morris 1992, p. 727.
  286. ^ * Vermes, Geza (2008). The Resurrection. London: Penguin. p. 141. ISBN 9780141912639.
  287. ^ Harris 1985, pp. 308–09.
  288. ^ Mark 16:5-6, Matthew 28:5-6, Luke 24:4-6
  289. ^ Mark 16:7, Matthew 28:7
  290. ^ Luke 24:12
  291. ^ John 20:2-8
  292. ^ Matthew 28:7
  293. ^ Matthew 28:11-15
  294. ^ Mark 16:9, John 20:14-17
  295. ^ Matthew 28:9-10
  296. ^ Luke 24:13-31
  297. ^ Mark 16:14, Matthew 28:16-17, John 20:19-23
  298. ^ Luke 24:36-43
  299. ^ John 20:24-29
  300. ^ Harris 1985, pp. 297–301.
  301. ^ Cox & Easley 2007, pp. 216–26.
  302. ^ Frederick F., Bruce (1990). The Acts of the Apostles. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 210. ISBN 978-0-8028-0966-7. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  303. ^ Acts 9:5
  304. ^ Johnson, Luke T.; Harrington, Daniel J. (1992). The Acts of the Apostles. Liturgical Press. pp. 164–67. ISBN 978-0-8146-5807-9.
  305. ^ Van den Biesen, Christian (1913). «Apocalypse» . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  306. ^ Catholic Encyclopedia: Proselyte Archived 10 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine: «The English term ‘proselyte’ occurs only in the New Testament where it signifies a convert to the Jewish religion (Matthew 23:15; Acts 2:11; 6:5; etc.), though the same Greek word is commonly used in the Septuagint to designate a foreigner living in Palestine. Thus the term seems to have passed from an original local and chiefly political sense, in which it was used as early as 300 BC, to a technical and religious meaning in the Judaism of the New Testament epoch.»
  307. ^ Ehrman 2012, pp. 87–90.
  308. ^ Jaeger, Werner (1961). Early Christianity and Greek Paideia. Harvard University Press. pp. 6, 108–09. ISBN 978-0-674-22052-2. Archived from the original on 17 December 2019. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  309. ^ Galatians 2:9, Acts 1:13; See Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles for details
  310. ^ Cross, F.L., ed. (2005). «Paul». The Oxford dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
  311. ^ Cohen, Shaye J.D. (1988). From the Maccabees to the Mishnah ISBN 978-0-664-25017-1 pp. 224–25
  312. ^ Fee, Gordon; Stuart, Douglas (2014). How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth: Fourth Edition. Zondervan. ISBN 978-0-310-51783-2. Archived from the original on 26 June 2019. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
  313. ^ Bart D. Ehrman (1997). The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Oxford University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-19-508481-8. Archived from the original on 16 April 2019. Retrieved 1 May 2018. The New Testament contains twenty-seven books, written in Greek, by fifteen or sixteen different authors, who were addressing other Christian individuals or communities between the years 50 and 120 C.E. (see box 1.4). As we will see, it is difficult to know whether any of these books was written by Jesus’ own disciples.
  314. ^ Levine 2006, p. 5.
  315. ^ Powell 1998, pp. 19–23.
  316. ^ Amy-Jill Levine in The Historical Jesus in Context edited by Amy-Jill Levine et al. Princeton University Press ISBN 978-0-691-00992-6 p. 4
  317. ^ a b Theissen & Winter 2002, p. 5.
  318. ^ Jesus Research: An International Perspective (Princeton-Prague Symposia Series on the Historical Jesus) by James H. Charlesworth and Petr Pokorny (15 September 2009) ISBN 978-0-8028-6353-9 pp. 1–2
  319. ^ Keener 2012, p. 163.
  320. ^ a b Chilton & Evans 1998, p. 27.
  321. ^ Evans 2012a, pp. 4–5.
  322. ^ Borg, Marcus J. (1994). Jesus in Contemporary Scholarship. Continuum. pp. 4–6. ISBN 978-1-56338-094-5.
  323. ^ Theissen & Winter 2002, pp. 142–143.
  324. ^ Anderson, Paul N.; Just, Felix; Thatcher, Tom (2007). John, Jesus, and History, Volume 1: Critical Appraisals of Critical Views. Society of Biblical Lit. p. 131. ISBN 978-1-58983-293-0. Archived from the original on 18 April 2017. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  325. ^ Meier 2006, p. 124.
  326. ^ Barr, James (1989). «Chapter 3 – Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek in the Hellenistic age». In Davies, W.D.; Finkelstein, Louis (eds.). The Cambridge history of Judaism. Volume 2: The Hellenistic Age (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 79–114. ISBN 978-1-139-05512-3.
  327. ^ a b Blomberg 2009, pp. 431–36.
  328. ^ a b c Harris 1985, p. 263.
  329. ^ Rausch 2003, pp. 36–37.
  330. ^ Anderson, Paul N.; Just, Felix; Thatcher, Tom (2007). John, Jesus, and History, Volume 2. Society of Biblical Lit. p. 291. ISBN 978-1-58983-293-0. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  331. ^ Anderson, Paul N.; Just, Felix; Thatcher, Tom (2007). John, Jesus, and History, Volume 2. Society of Biblical Lit. p. 292. ISBN 978-1-58983-293-0. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  332. ^ Funk, Hoover & The Jesus Seminar 1993, pp. 471–532.
  333. ^ Casey, Maurice (30 December 2010). Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian’s Account of His Life and Teaching. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-567-64517-3.
  334. ^ Ehrman, Bart D. (1997). The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-508481-8.
  335. ^ Tuckett, Christopher (2001). «Sources and methods». In Bockmuehl, Markus N.A. (ed.). Cambridge Companion to Jesus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 123–24. ISBN 978-0-521-79678-1.
  336. ^ Van Voorst 2000, pp. 39–53.
  337. ^ Van Voorst 2000, p. 83.
  338. ^ Maier, Paul L. (1995). Josephus, the essential works: a condensation of Jewish antiquities and The Jewish war. p. 285. ISBN 978-0-8254-3260-6. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  339. ^ Evans, Craig A. (2001). Jesus and His Contemporaries: Comparative Studies. Brill. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-391-04118-9. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  340. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998.
  341. ^ Reed 2002, p. 18.
  342. ^ a b Gowler, David B. (2007). What are they saying about the historical Jesus?. Paulist Press. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-8091-4445-7.
  343. ^ Charlesworth, James H., ed. (2006). «Archived copy». Jesus and archaeology. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 127. ISBN 978-0-8028-4880-2. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  344. ^ a b Humphreys & Waddington 1992, p. 340.
  345. ^ Maier 1989, pp. 115–18.
  346. ^ a b Niswonger 1992, pp. 121–22.
  347. ^ Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, pp. 137–38.
  348. ^ Niswonger 1992, pp. 122–24.
  349. ^ a b Vermes, Géza (2010). The Nativity: History and Legend. Random House Digital. pp. 81–82. ISBN 978-0-307-49918-9. Archived from the original on 3 May 2016. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
  350. ^ Dunn 2003, p. 324.
  351. ^ a b Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, p. 140.
  352. ^ a b Freedman 2000, p. 249.
  353. ^ Maier 1989, pp. 120–21.
  354. ^ s:The Antiquities of the Jews/Book XV
  355. ^ Maier 1989, p. 123.
  356. ^ Evans, Craig (2006). «Josephus on John the Baptist». In Levine, Amy-Jill; Allison, Dale C.; Crossan, John D. (eds.). The Historical Jesus in Context. Princeton University Press. pp. 55–58. ISBN 978-0-691-00992-6. Archived from the original on 3 May 2016. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
  357. ^ Gillman, Florence M. (2003). Herodias: at home in that fox’s den. Liturgical Press. pp. 25–30. ISBN 978-0-8146-5108-7.
  358. ^ Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, p. 398.
  359. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, pp. 81–83.
  360. ^ Green, Joel B. (1997). The gospel of Luke: New International Commentary on the New Testament Series. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-8028-2315-1. Archived from the original on 25 April 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  361. ^ Carter 2003, pp. 44–45.
  362. ^ Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, pp. 398–400.
  363. ^ Barnett, Paul (2002). Jesus & the Rise of Early Christianity: A History of New Testament Times. InterVarsity Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8308-2699-5. Archived from the original on 3 May 2016. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
  364. ^ Pratt, J. P. (1991). «Newton’s Date for the Crucifixion». Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 32: 301–04. Bibcode:1991QJRAS..32..301P. Archived from the original on 16 January 2010. Retrieved 17 May 2013.
  365. ^ a b White, L. Michael (2010). Scripting Jesus: The Gospels in Rewrite. HarperOne.
  366. ^ Brown 1978, p. 64.
  367. ^ a b Theissen & Merz 1998, p. 194.
  368. ^ Funk, Robert W.; The Jesus Seminar (1998). «Mark». The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus. HarperSanFrancisco. pp. 51–161.
  369. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, James, St..
  370. ^ Vermes 1981, p. 283.
  371. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey (1995) International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Eerdmans Publishing, ISBN 978-0-8028-3784-4, p. 991.
  372. ^ Keener 2009b, p. 83.
  373. ^ Donald A. Hagner, Matthew 1–13 (Paternoster Press 1993 ISBN 978-0-8499-0232-1), pp. 14–15, cited in the preceding
  374. ^ Erickson, Millard J. (August 1998). Christian Theology. p. 761. ISBN 978-1-4412-0010-5. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
  375. ^ Lowe, Scott C. (20 September 2010). Christmas – Philosophy for Everyone: Better Than a Lump of Coal. Wiley. p. 28. ISBN 978-1-4443-3090-8. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
  376. ^ Bruner, Frederick Dale (30 April 2004). Matthew a Commentary: The Christbook, Matthew 1-12, Volume 1. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-8028-1118-9. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
  377. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 85–88.
  378. ^ Cousland, J. R. C. (16 November 2017). Holy Terror: Jesus in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-0-567-66817-2.
  379. ^ Gambero, Luigi (1999). Mary and the Fathers of the Church: The Blessed Virgin Mary in Patristic Thought. Ignatius Press. ISBN 978-0-89870-686-4.
  380. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, p. 196.
  381. ^ Funk, Robert W.; The Jesus Seminar (1998). «Birth & Infancy Stories». The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus. HarperSanFrancisco. pp. 497–526.
  382. ^ Powell 1998, p. 47.
  383. ^ Murphy, Catherine (2003). John the Baptist: Prophet of Purity for a New Age. Liturgical Press. pp. 29–30. ISBN 978-0-8146-5933-5. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  384. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, p. 235.
  385. ^ Borg, Marcus J. (2006). «The Spirit-Filled Experience of Jesus». In Dunn, James D.G.; McKnight, Scot (eds.). The Historical Jesus in Recent Research. Eisenbrauns. p. 303. ISBN 978-1-57506-100-9. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  386. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 205–23.
  387. ^ Ehrman 1999, pp. 167–70.
  388. ^ a b Ehrman 1999, pp. 164–67.
  389. ^ Ehrman 1999, pp. 171–76.
  390. ^ Luke 6:29
  391. ^ Funk, Hoover & The Jesus Seminar 1993, p. 294.
  392. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, p. 310.
  393. ^ a b Sanders 1993, p. 10.
  394. ^ a b c d e Ehrman 1999, pp. 186–87.
  395. ^ Matthew 19:28, Luke 22:30
  396. ^ a b c Sanders 1993, pp. 123–24.
  397. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 230–36.
  398. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, p. 336.
  399. ^ Mark 13:24–27, Matthew 24:29–31, Luke 21:25–28
  400. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, Messiah.
  401. ^ a b Theissen & Merz 1998, pp. 533–40.
  402. ^ Ehrman, Bart (1 December 2015). «Judas and the Messianic Secret». The Bart Ehrman Blog. Archived from the original on 23 February 2016. Retrieved 15 February 2016.
  403. ^ Ehrman, Bart (1 December 2015). «Jesus’ Claim to be the Messiah». The Bart Ehrman Blog. Archived from the original on 23 February 2016. Retrieved 15 February 2016.
  404. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 254–62.
  405. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 263–64.
  406. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, pp. 465–66.
  407. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 269–73.
  408. ^ Meier 2006, pp. 126–28.
  409. ^ Sanders 1993, pp. 276–81.
  410. ^ Theissen & Winter 2002, pp. 4–5.
  411. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, Historical Jesus, Quest of the.
  412. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, pp. 1–15.
  413. ^ Mitchell, Margaret M.; Young, Frances M. (2006). The Cambridge History of Christianity. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-521-81239-9. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  414. ^ Köstenberger, Kellum & Quarles 2009, pp. 124–25.
  415. ^ Brown, Colin (2011). «Why Study the Historical Jesus?». In Holmen, Tom; Porter, Stanley E. (eds.). Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus. Brill. p. 1416. ISBN 978-90-04-16372-0. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  416. ^ a b c d Houlden 2006, pp. 63–99.
  417. ^ a b Erricker, Clive (1987). Teaching Christianity: a world religions approach. James Clarke & Co. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-7188-2634-5.
  418. ^ Green, McKnight & Marshall 1992, p. 442.
  419. ^ Barr, James (1970). «Which language did Jesus speak». Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester. 53 (1): 9–29. doi:10.7227/BJRL.53.1.2. Archived from the original on 3 December 2018. Retrieved 27 July 2011.
  420. ^ Porter, Stanley E. (1997). Handbook to exegesis of the New Testament. Brill. pp. 110–12. ISBN 978-90-04-09921-0.
  421. ^ Dunn 2003, pp. 313–15.
  422. ^ Allen C. Myers, ed. (1987). «Aramaic». The Eerdmans Bible Dictionary. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-8028-2402-8. It is generally agreed that Aramaic was the common language of Israel in the first century AD. Jesus and his disciples spoke the Galilean dialect, which was distinguished from that of Jerusalem (Matt. 26:73).
  423. ^ «Aramaic language». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 27 April 2015. Retrieved 27 June 2019.
  424. ^ Ehrman 1999, p. 96.
  425. ^ Elliott, John (2007). «Jesus the Israelite Was Neither a ‘Jew’ nor a ‘Christian’: On Correcting Misleading Nomenclature». Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus. 5 (119): 119. doi:10.1177/1476869007079741.
  426. ^ Garroway, Rabbi Joshua (2011). «Ioudaios». In Amy-Jill Levine; Marc Z. Brettler (eds.). The Jewish Annotated New Testament. Oxford University Press. pp. 524–26. ISBN 978-0-19-529770-6.
  427. ^ Miller, David M. (2010). «The Meaning of Ioudaios and its Relationship to Other Group Labels in Ancient ‘Judaism’«. Currents in Biblical Research. 9 (1): 98–126. doi:10.1177/1476993X09360724. S2CID 144383064.
  428. ^ Mason, Steve (2007). «Jews, Judaeans, Judaizing, Judaism: Problems of Categorization in Ancient History» (PDF). Journal for the Study of Judaism. 38 (4): 457–512. doi:10.1163/156851507X193108. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 March 2015.
  429. ^ Levine 2006, p. 10.
  430. ^ Jensen, Robin M. (2010). «Jesus in Christian art». In Burkett, Delbert (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Jesus. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 477–502. ISBN 978-1-4443-5175-0.
  431. ^ a b Perkinson, Stephen (2009). The likeness of the king: a prehistory of portraiture in late medieval France. University of Chicago Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-226-65879-7.
  432. ^ Kidd, Colin (2006). The forging of races: race and scripture in the Protestant Atlantic world. Cambridge University Press. pp. 48–51. ISBN 978-1-139-45753-8.
  433. ^ Taylor, Joan E. (2018). What did Jesus look like? (1st ed.). London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-567-67150-9. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
  434. ^ Taylor, Joan. «What Did Jesus Wear?». Pocket. Mozilla. Archived from the original on 20 May 2020. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
  435. ^ Ehrman 2012, p. 12.
  436. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, pp. 113–15.
  437. ^ a b c Theissen & Merz 1998, p. 90.
  438. ^ Bart Ehrman: «He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees, based on certain and clear evidence.» B. Ehrman, 2011 Forged : writing in the name of God ISBN 978-0-06-207863-6. p. 256-257
  439. ^ Gullotta, Daniel N. (2017). «On Richard Carrier’s Doubts: A Response to Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt». Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus. 15 (2–3): 312. doi:10.1163/17455197-01502009. [Per Jesus mythicism] Given the fringe status of these theories, the vast majority have remained unnoticed and unaddressed within scholarly circles.
  440. ^ James D.G. Dunn «Paul’s understanding of the death of Jesus» in Sacrifice and Redemption edited by S.W. Sykes (3 December 2007) Cambridge University Press ISBN 978-0-521-04460-8 pp. 35–36
  441. ^ Jesus Now and Then by Richard A. Burridge and Graham Gould (1 April 2004) ISBN 978-0-8028-0977-3 p. 34
  442. ^ Jesus by Michael Grant 2004 ISBN 978-1-898799-88-7 p. 200
  443. ^ The Gospels and Jesus by Graham Stanton, 1989 ISBN 978-0-19-213241-3 Oxford University Press, p. 145
  444. ^ Robert E. Van Voorst Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence Eerdmans Publishing, 2000. ISBN 978-0-8028-4368-5 p. 16
  445. ^ Skarsaune, Oskar; Hvalvik, Reidar (2007). Jewish believers in Jesus: the early centuries. Hendrickson Publishers. p. 55. ISBN 9781565637634.
  446. ^ Levine 2007, p. 61.
  447. ^ Levine 2007, p. 17.
  448. ^ Watson, Francis (2001). «The quest for the real Jesus». In Bockmuehl, Markus N.A. (ed.). Cambridge companion to Jesus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 156–57. ISBN 978-0-521-79678-1. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  449. ^ Evans, C. Stephen (1996). The historical Christ and the Jesus of faith. Oxford University Press. p. v. ISBN 978-0-19-152042-6.
  450. ^ Delbert, Burkett (2010). The Blackwell Companion to Jesus. John Wiley & Sons. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-4443-5175-0.
  451. ^ Jackson, Gregory L. (1993). Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison. Christian News. pp. 11–17. ISBN 978-0-615-16635-3.
  452. ^ McGuckin, John A. (2010). The Orthodox Church: An Introduction to Its History, Doctrine. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 6–7. ISBN 978-1-4443-9383-5.
  453. ^ Leith, John H. (1993). Basic Christian doctrine. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 1–2. ISBN 978-0-664-25192-5.
  454. ^ Schreiner, Thomas R. (2008). New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ. Baker Academic. pp. 23–37. ISBN 978-0-8010-2680-5. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  455. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, Great Schism.
  456. ^ 1 Corinthians 15:12–20
  457. ^ «The Letter of Paul to the Corinthians». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  458. ^ Cullmann, Oscar (1959). The Christology of the New Testament. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-664-24351-7.
  459. ^ Deme, Dániel (2004). The Christology of Anselm of Canterbury. Ashgate Publishing. pp. 199–200. ISBN 978-0-7546-3779-0.
  460. ^ Pannenberg, Wolfhart (2004). Systematic Theology. Vol. 2. Continuum. pp. 297–303. ISBN 978-0-567-08466-8.
  461. ^ Ehrman 2014.
  462. ^ a b Cross & Livingstone 2005, Antitrinitarianism.
  463. ^ Friedmann, Robert. «Antitrinitarianism». Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 20 October 2012. Retrieved 24 October 2012.
  464. ^ Joyce, George H. (1913). «Blessed Trinity» . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  465. ^ «Mormonism 101: What is Mormonism», MormonNewsroom.org, LDS Church, 13 October 2014, archived from the original on 21 October 2014, retrieved 21 October 2014
  466. ^ Hunter, Sylvester (2010). Outlines of dogmatic theology. Vol. 2. Nabu Press. p. 443. ISBN 978-1-177-95809-7.
  467. ^ a b Houlden 2006, p. 426.
  468. ^ Kessler, Ed. «Jesus the Jew». BBC. Archived from the original on 7 December 2012. Retrieved 18 June 2013.
  469. ^ Norman, Asher (2007). Twenty-six reasons why Jews don’t believe in Jesus. Feldheim Publishers. pp. 59–70. ISBN 978-0-9771937-0-7. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  470. ^ Ezekiel 37:26–28
  471. ^ Isaiah 43:5–6
  472. ^ Isaiah 2:4
  473. ^ Zechariah 14:9
  474. ^ Simmons, Rabbi Shraga, «Why Jews Don’t Believe in Jesus» Archived 27 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Accessed 22 December 2011.
  475. ^ Simmons, Shraga (6 March 2004). «Why Jews Do not Believe in Jesus». Aish.com. Archived from the original on 16 March 2006. Retrieved 24 February 2006.
  476. ^ «Malachi, Book of». Jewish Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 18 May 2013. Retrieved 3 July 2013.
  477. ^ «Talmud». Jewish Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 6 September 2011. Retrieved 3 July 2013.
  478. ^ Kessler, Edward; Wenborn, Neil (2005). A Dictionary of Jewish-Christian Relations. Cambridge University Press. p. 416. ISBN 978-1-139-44750-8. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  479. ^ David M. Neuhaus, ‘How Israeli Jews’ Fear of Christianity Turned Into Hatred’, Haaretz 6 February: ‘The religious public in Israel is in many cases aware of the traditional interpretation of the term «Yeshu»: an acronym in Hebrew for «may his name and memory be blotted out.»‘
  480. ^ Theissen & Merz 1998, pp. 74–75.
  481. ^ Jeffrey, Grant R. (2009). Heaven: The Mystery of Angels. Random House Digital. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-307-50940-6. Archived from the original on 14 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  482. ^ Adam Sutcliffe (10 November 2005). Judaism and Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press. pp. 141–. ISBN 978-0-521-67232-0. Archived from the original on 8 December 2019. Retrieved 11 January 2018.
  483. ^ Augustine of Hippo (2006). Ramsey, Boniface (ed.). The Manichean Debate. ISBN 978-1-56548-247-0. Retrieved 18 August 2012.
  484. ^ John C. Reeves (1996). Heralds of That Good Realm: Syro-Mesopotamian Gnosis and Jewish Traditions. BRILL. pp. 6–. ISBN 978-90-04-10459-4. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
  485. ^ Bevan, A.A. (1930). «Manichaeism». In Hastings, James (ed.). Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics. Vol. 8. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7661-3666-3.
  486. ^ Gulácsi, Zsuzsanna (2015). Mani’s Pictures: The Didactic Images of the Manichaeans from Sasanian Mesopotamia to Uygur Central Asia and Tang-Ming China (PDF). Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies. Vol. 90. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-30894-7.
  487. ^ Lieu, Samuel N. C. (1 January 1992). Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China. ISBN 978-3-16-145820-0.
  488. ^ «Quran 3:46–158». Archived from the original on 1 May 2015.
  489. ^ Siddiqui, Mona (2013). Christians, Muslims, and Jesus. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-16970-6.
  490. ^ Esposito, John L. (2003). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford University Press. p. 158. ISBN 978-0-19-975726-8. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  491. ^ Paget, James C. (2001). «Quests for the historical Jesus». In Bockmuehl, Markus N.A. (ed.). Cambridge companion to Jesus. Cambridge University Press. p. 183. ISBN 978-0-521-79678-1. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  492. ^ Ashraf, Irshad (Director) (19 August 2007). The Muslim Jesus (Television production). ITV Productions.
  493. ^ «Jesus, Son of Mary». Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Archived from the original on 2 July 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2013.
  494. ^ Aboul-Enein, Youssef H. (2010). Militant Islamist Ideology: Understanding the Global Threat. Naval Institute Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-1-61251-015-6. Archived from the original on 14 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  495. ^ a b Fasching, Darrell J.; deChant, Dell (2001). Comparative Religious Ethics: A Narrative Approach. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 241, 274–75. ISBN 978-0-631-20125-0.
  496. ^ George, Timothy (2002). Is the Father of Jesus the God of Muhammad?: Understanding the Differences Between Christianity and Islam. Zondervan. pp. 150–51. ISBN 978-0-310-24748-7. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  497. ^ a b c Burns, Robert A. (2011). Christianity, Islam, and the West. University Press of America. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-7618-5560-6. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  498. ^ a b Peters, F. E. (2003). Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians. Princeton University Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-691-11553-5.
  499. ^ Cooper, Anne; Maxwell, Elsie A. (2003). Ishmael My Brother: A Christian Introduction To Islam. Monarch Books. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-8254-6223-8. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  500. ^ «The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Translation». Corpus.quran.com. Archived from the original on 18 April 2016. Retrieved 20 May 2016.
  501. ^ Quran 4:157: «And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah Jesus son of Mary, Allah’s messenger — They slew him not nor crucified, but it appeared so unto them» (4:157) by Marmaduke Pickthall.
  502. ^ Robinson 2005; Lawson 2009. The substitution theory was criticized and rejected by the Sunni Quran commentator Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (1150–1210); see Lawson 2009, pp. 156–162. According to Abu Mansur al-Baghdadi (d. 1037), the substitution theory was also applied to the death of Ali ibn Abi Talib by the semi-legendary 7th-century figure Abdallah ibn Saba’; see De Smet 2016, pp. 98–99.
  503. ^ On the writings attributed to al‐Mufaddal ibn Umar al‐Ju’fi, see De Smet 2016, p. 93. On the Brethren of Purity, see Robinson 1991, pp. 55–57, Lawson 2009, pp. 129–133 and especially De Smet 2016, pp. 100–101. On the Isma’ili philosophers (who include Abu Hatim al-Razi, Abu Tammam, Ja’far ibn Mansur al-Yaman, Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani and Ibrahim al-Hamidi), see Lawson 2009, pp. 123–129 and especially De Smet 2016, pp. 101–107. On al-Ghazali, see Lawson 2009, pp. 117–118. This type of interpretation of Quran 4:157–159 was specifically rejected by the Sunni Quran commentator al-Baydawi (d. 1319); see Lawson 2009, p. 155.
  504. ^ Khalidi, Tarif (2001). The Muslim Jesus: Sayings and Stories in Islamic Literature. Harvard University Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-0-674-00477-1.
  505. ^ Robinson 2005.
  506. ^ Virani, Shafique N. (2011). «Taqiyya and Identity in a South Asian Community». The Journal of Asian Studies. 70 (1): 99–139. doi:10.1017/S0021911810002974. ISSN 0021-9118. S2CID 143431047. p. 128.
  507. ^ Friedmann 1989, pp. 111–118.
  508. ^ Friedmann 1989, p. 114; Melton 2010, p. 55.
  509. ^ Dana, Nissim (2008). The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status. Michigan University press. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-903900-36-9.
  510. ^ Dana, Nissim (1980). The Druse, a Religious Community in Transition. Turtledove. p. 11. ISBN 9789652000286.
  511. ^ Betts, Robert Brenton (1988). The Druze. Yale University Press. p. 21. ISBN 9780300048100.
  512. ^ Swayd, Samy (2019). The A to Z of the Druzes. Rowman & Littlefield. p. xxxviii. ISBN 9780810870024.
  513. ^ Hartz, Paula (2009). Baha’i Faith. New York: Chelsea House Publishers. pp. 14–15. ISBN 9781604131048.
  514. ^ Miller, William McElwee (1974). The Baha’i faith: its history and teachings. South Pasadena: William Carey Library. p. 355. ISBN 9780878081370.
  515. ^ Stockman, Robert (1992). «Jesus Christ in the Baháʼí Writings». Baháʼí Studies Review. 2 (1). Archived from the original on 7 June 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2010.
  516. ^ Cole, Juan (1982). «The Concept of Manifestation in the Bahaʼi Writings». Études Baháʼí Studies. 9: 1–38. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2012.
  517. ^ Smith, Peter (2008). An Introduction to the Baha’i Faith. Cambridge University Press. p. 107. ISBN 978-0-521-86251-6.
  518. ^ Adamson, Hugh C. (2009). The A to Z of the Baháʼí Faith. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press. p. 188. ISBN 9780810868533.
  519. ^ Beckwith, Francis (1985). Bahaʼi. Minneapolis: Bethany House. pp. 13–15. ISBN 9780871238481.
  520. ^ Garlington, William (2005). The Baha’i Faith in America. Westport, Conn: Praeger Publishers. p. 175. ISBN 9780742562349.
  521. ^ Lepard, Brian D. (2008). In the Glory of the Father: The Baháʼí Faith and Christianity. Baháʼí Publishing Trust. p. 118. ISBN 978-1-931847-34-6. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  522. ^ a b Cole, Juan R. I. (1997). «Behold the Man: Baha’u’llah on the Life of Jesus». Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 65 (1): 51, 56, 60.
  523. ^ Smith, Peter (2000). «peace». A concise encyclopedia of the Bahá’í Faith. Oneworld Publications. p. 214. ISBN 978-1-85168-184-6.
  524. ^ McManners, John (2001). The Oxford Illustrated History of Christianity. Oxford University Press. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-19-285439-1. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  525. ^ Ehrman, Bart D. (2003). Lost Christianities: The Battles For Scripture And The Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford University Press. pp. 124–25. ISBN 978-0-19-518249-1. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  526. ^ Rishi Das, Shaunaka (24 March 2009). «Jesus in Hinduism». BBC. Archived from the original on 25 November 2018. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
  527. ^ Yogananda, Paramahansa (2008). Autobiography of a Yogi. Diamond Pocket Books. ISBN 978-81-902562-0-9. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  528. ^ Beverley, James A. (11 June 2011). «Hollywood’s Idol». Christianity Today. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2013.
  529. ^ Hutson, Steven (2006). What They Never Taught You in Sunday School: A Fresh Look at Following Jesus. City Boy Enterprises. p. 57. ISBN 978-1-59886-300-0. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  530. ^ Pike, Sarah M. (2004). New Age and neopagan religions in America. Columbia University Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-231-12402-7.
  531. ^ Bailey, Alice; Khul, Djwhal (2005). A Treatise on Cosmic Fire. Lucis Publishing Company. pp. 678, 1150, 1193. ISBN 978-0-85330-117-2. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  532. ^ House, Wayne (2000). Charts of Cults, Sects and Religious Movements. Zondervan. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-310-38551-6. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  533. ^ Theodore, Antony (2019). Jesus Christ in Love. Translated by Pradhan, Tapan Kumar. New Delhi: Kohinoor Books. ISBN 978-8-194-28353-9. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
  534. ^ Schweitzer, Albert (1948). The Psychiatric Study of Jesus: Exposition and Criticism. Translated by Joy, Charles R. Boston: Beacon Press. LCCN 48006488. OCLC 614572512. OL 6030284M.
  535. ^ Bundy, Walter E. (1922). The Psychic Health of Jesus. New York: The Macmillan Company. LCCN 22005555. OCLC 644667928. OL 25583375M.
  536. ^ Dawkins, Richard (16 January 2008). The God Delusion. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 284. ISBN 978-0-547-34866-7. Archived from the original on 27 March 2015. Retrieved 13 December 2014.
  537. ^ «Dura-Europos: Excavating Antiquity | Yale University Art Gallery». media.artgallery.yale.edu. Archived from the original on 5 May 2017. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  538. ^ Gutmann, Joseph (1992). «Early Christian and Jewish Art». In Attridge, Harold W.; Hata, Gohei (eds.). Eusebius, Christianity, and Judaism. Wayne State University Press. pp. 283–84. ISBN 978-0-8143-2361-8. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  539. ^ Benedetto, Robert (2006). The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 51–53. ISBN 978-0-664-22416-5.
  540. ^ Schaff, Phillip (1 July 2006). History of the Christian Church,8 volumes, 3rd edition. Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers. ISBN 978-1-56563-196-0. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  541. ^ Synod of Elvira, ‘Pictures are not to be placed in churches, so that they do not become objects of worship and adoration’, AD 306, Canon 36
  542. ^ a b Cross & Livingstone 2005, Icons.
  543. ^ Michalski, Sergiusz (1993). Reformation and the Visual Arts. Routledge. p. 195. ISBN 978-1-134-92102-7.
  544. ^ Payton, James R. (2007). Light from the Christian East: An Introduction to the Orthodox Tradition. InterVarsity Press. pp. 178–79. ISBN 978-0-8308-2594-3.
  545. ^ Williams, Rowan (2003). The Dwelling of the Light: Praying with Icons of Christ. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-8028-2778-4.
  546. ^ Wojtyła, Karol J. «General audience 29 October 1997». Vatican Publishing House. Archived from the original on 3 March 2013. Retrieved 20 April 2013.
  547. ^ Ratzinger, Joseph A. «General audience 6 May 2009». Vatican Publishing House. Archived from the original on 3 March 2013. Retrieved 20 April 2013.
  548. ^ Doninger 1999, p. 231.
  549. ^ Casiday, Augustine (2012). The Orthodox Christian World. Routledge. p. 447. ISBN 978-0-415-45516-9.
  550. ^ Bigham, Steven (1995). The image of God the Father in Orthodox theology and iconography. St Vladimir’s Seminary Press. pp. 226–27. ISBN 978-1-879038-15-8.
  551. ^ Cross & Livingstone 2005, Crucifix.
  552. ^ Levine 2006, pp. 24–25.
  553. ^ a b Helmut Koester Introduction to the New Testament, Vol. 1: History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age. Berlin: de Gruyter Press, 1995 p. 382
  554. ^ Flavius Josephus, The Jewish War Book VII, section 1.1″
  555. ^ Margaret M. Mitchell «The Cambridge History of Christianity, Volume 1: Origins to Constantine» Cambridge University Press 2006 p. 298
  556. ^ Nickell, Joe (2007). Relics of the Christ. University Press of Kentucky. p. 191. ISBN 978-0-8131-3731-5.
  557. ^ Habermas, Gary R. «Shroud of Turin». The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization (2011). doi:10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc1257
  558. ^ Ball, P. (2008). «Material witness: Shrouded in mystery». Nature Materials. 7 (5): 349. Bibcode:2008NatMa…7..349B. doi:10.1038/nmat2170. PMID 18432204.
  559. ^ Dillenberger 1999, p. 5.
  560. ^ Thurston, Herbert (1913). «Holy Nails» . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  561. ^ Delaney, Sarah (24 May 2010). «Shroud exposition closes with more than 2 million visits». Catholic News Service. Archived from the original on 8 June 2010.
  562. ^ Wojtyła, Karol J. (24 May 1998). «Pope John Paul II’s address in Turin Cathedral». Vatican Publishing House. Archived from the original on 19 February 2017. Retrieved 18 February 2017.
  563. ^ Squires, Nick (3 May 2010). «Pope Benedict says Shroud of Turin authentic burial robe of Jesus». Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on 1 April 2013. Retrieved 19 June 2013.

Sources

  • Hare, Douglas (1993). Matthew. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-23433-1.
  • Ayali-Darshan, Noga (2018). «The Elements ‫ש(ו)ע/שבע/תע‬ in Biblical Proper Names: A Re-evaluation». Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages. Stellenbosch University. 44 (1). hdl:10520/EJC-ff5bd8a45 – via academia.edu.
  • Blomberg, Craig L. (2009). Jesus and the Gospels: An Introduction and Survey. B&H Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8054-4482-7. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Boring, M. Eugene; Craddock, Fred B. (2004). The people’s New Testament commentary. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-22754-8. Archived from the original on 4 January 2014. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  • Brown, Raymond E. (1977). The Birth of the Messiah: a commentary on the infancy narratives in Matthew and Luke. Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-05907-7.
  • Brown, Raymond E. (1978). Mary in the New Testament. Paulist Press. ISBN 978-0-8091-2168-7. Archived from the original on 17 September 2014. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  • Brown, Raymond E. (1988). The Gospel and Epistles of John: A Concise Commentary. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-1283-5.
  • Brown, Raymond E. (1997). An Introduction to the New Testament. Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-24767-2.
  • Carter, Warren (2003). Pontius Pilate: portraits of a Roman governor. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-5113-1. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Chilton, Bruce; Evans, Craig A. (1998). Studying the Historical Jesus: Evaluations of the State of Current Research. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-11142-4. Archived from the original on 4 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Cox, Steven L.; Easley, Kendell H (2007). Harmony of the Gospels. B&H Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8054-9444-0. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Cross, Frank L.; Livingstone, E.A., eds. (2005). Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3. Archived from the original on 15 May 2019. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Crossan, John D.; Watts, Richard G. (1999). Who Is Jesus?: Answers to Your Questions About the Historical Jesus. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-25842-9.
  • De Smet, Daniel (2016). «Les racines docétistes de l’imamologie shi’ite». In Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali; De Cillis, Maria; De Smet, Daniel; Mir-Kasimov, Orkhan (eds.). L’Ésotérisme shi’ite, ses racines et ses prolongements – Shi’i Esotericism: Its Roots and Developments. Bibliothèque de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes, Sciences Religieuses. Vol. 177. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 87–112. doi:10.1484/M.BEHE-EB.4.01163. ISBN 978-2-503-56874-4.
  • Dickson, John (2008). Jesus: A Short Life. Kregel Publications. ISBN 978-0-8254-7802-4.
  • Dillenberger, John (1999). Images and Relics : Theological Perceptions and Visual Images in Sixteenth-Century Europe: Theological Perceptions and Visual Images in Sixteenth-Century Europe. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-976146-3.
  • Donahue, John R.; Harrington, Daniel J. (2002). The Gospel of Mark. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-5804-8. Archived from the original on 3 January 2014. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Doninger, Wendy (1999). Merriam-Webster’s Encyclopedia of World Religions. Merriam-Webster. ISBN 978-0-87779-044-0.
  • Dunn, James D.G. (2003). Jesus Remembered. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8028-3931-2.
  • Eddy, Paul R.; Boyd, Gregory A. (2007). The Jesus legend: a case for the historical reliability of the synoptic Jesus tradition. Baker Academic. ISBN 978-0-8010-3114-4. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Ehrman, Bart (1999). Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-983943-8.
  • Ehrman, Bart D. (2009). Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (and Why We Don’t Know About Them). HarperOne. ISBN 978-0-06-117393-6.
  • Ehrman, Bart D. (2014). How Jesus Became God. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06225-219-7.
  • Ehrman, Bart (2011). Forged: writing in the name of God – Why the Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-207863-6.
  • Ehrman, Bart D. (2012). Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth. HarperOne. ISBN 978-0-06-208994-6. Archived from the original on 3 August 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Evans, Craig A. (2003). The Bible Knowledge Background Commentary: Matthew-Luke. David C. Cook. ISBN 978-0-7814-3868-1.
  • Evans, Craig A. (2005). The Bible Knowledge Background Commentary: John’s Gospel, Hebrews-Revelation. David C. Cook. ISBN 978-0-7814-4228-2. Archived from the original on 20 August 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Evans, Craig A. (2012a). Jesus and His World: The Archaeological Evidence. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-23413-3. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Evans, Craig A. (2012b). Matthew (New Cambridge Bible Commentary). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01106-8.
  • Finegan, Jack (1998). Handbook of Biblical Chronology. Hendrickson Publishers. ISBN 978-1-56563-143-4.
  • France, R.T. (2007). The Gospel of Matthew. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8028-2501-8. Archived from the original on 15 September 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Freedman, David N. (2000). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Amsterdam University Press. ISBN 978-0-8028-2400-4. Archived from the original on 3 August 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Friedmann, Yohanan (1989). Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and Its Medieval Background. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 9780520057722.
  • Funk, Robert W.; Hoover, Roy W.; The Jesus Seminar (1993). The Five Gospels. Scribner. ISBN 978-0-0254-1949-0. OCLC 819666252.
  • Green, Joel B.; McKnight, Scot; Marshall, I. Howard (1992). Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. InterVarsity Press. p. 442. ISBN 978-0-8308-1777-1. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Grudem, Wayne (1994). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. ISBN 978-0-310-28670-7.
  • Harris, Stephen L. (1985). Understanding the Bible. Mayfield.
  • Houlden, J. Leslie (2006). Jesus: the complete guide. Continuum. ISBN 978-0-8264-8011-8. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Humphreys, Colin J.; Waddington, W. G. (1992). «The Jewish Calendar, a Lunar Eclipse and the Date of Christ’s Crucifixion» (PDF). Tyndale Bulletin. 43 (2): 331–351. doi:10.53751/001c.30487. S2CID 189519018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 April 2019. Retrieved 21 April 2019.
  • Keener, Craig S. (2009b). The Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. ISBN 978-0-8028-6498-7.
  • Keener, Craig S. (2009). The Historical Jesus of the Gospels. William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
  • Keener, Craig S. (2012). The Historical Jesus of the Gospels. William B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8028-6292-1.
  • Köstenberger, Andreas J.; Kellum, L. Scott; Quarles, Charles L (2009). The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown: An Introduction to the New Testament. B&H Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8054-4365-3. Archived from the original on 27 July 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Lawson, Todd (2009). The Crucifixion and the Qur’an: A Study in the History of Muslim Thought. Oxford: Oneworld. ISBN 978-1-85168-635-3.
  • Lee, Dorothy A. (2004). Transfiguration. Continuum. ISBN 978-0-8264-7595-4. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Levine, Amy-Jill (2006). «Introduction». In Levine, Amy-Jill; Allison, Dale C.; Crossan, John D. (eds.). The Historical Jesus in Context. Princeton Univ Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00992-6. Archived from the original on 10 April 2014. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Levine, Amy-Jill (2007). The Misunderstood Jew: The Church and the Scandal of the Jewish Jesus. Harper-Collins. ISBN 9780061748110.
  • Licona, Michael R. (2010). The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach. InterVarsity Press. ISBN 978-0-8308-2719-0. Archived from the original on 18 February 2020. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
  • Maier, Paul L. (1989). «The Date of the Nativity and Chronology of Jesus». In Finegan, Jack; Vardaman, Jerry; Yamauchi, Edwin M. (eds.). Chronos, kairos, Christos: nativity and chronological studies. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-0-931464-50-8. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  • Majerník, Ján; Ponessa, Joseph; Manhardt, Laurie W. (2005). The Synoptics: Matthew, Mark, Luke. Emmaus Road Publishing. ISBN 978-1-931018-31-9. Archived from the original on 19 August 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • McGrath, Alister E. (2006). Christianity: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 4–6. ISBN 978-1-4051-0899-7. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  • Meier, John P. (1991). A Marginal Jew: The Roots of the Problem and the Person. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-14018-7.
  • Meier, John P. (2006). «How do we decide what comes from Jesus». In Dunn, James D.G.; McKnight, Scot (eds.). The Historical Jesus in Recent Research. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-1-57506-100-9. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  • Melton, J. Gordon (2010). «Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam Hazrat». In Melton, J. Gordon; Baumann, Martin (eds.). Religions of the World: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices. Vol. 1 (2 ed.). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. pp. 54–56. ISBN 978-1-59884-203-6. Archived from the original on 21 October 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  • Mills, Watson E.; Bullard, Roger A. (1998). Mercer dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN 978-0-86554-373-7. Archived from the original on 18 October 2017. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  • Morris, Leon (1992). The Gospel according to Matthew. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-85111-338-8. Archived from the original on 2 August 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Niswonger, Richard L. (1992). New Testament History. Zondervan. ISBN 978-0-310-31201-7.
  • Pannenberg, Wolfhart (1968). Jesus – God and Man. S.C.M. Press. ISBN 978-0-334-00783-8. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Powell, Mark A. (1998). Jesus as a Figure in History: How Modern Historians View the Man from Galilee. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-25703-3.
  • Rahner, Karl (2004). Encyclopedia of theology: a concise Sacramentum mundi. Continuum. ISBN 978-0-86012-006-3. Archived from the original on 27 July 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Rausch, Thomas P. (2003). Who is Jesus?: an introduction to Christology. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-5078-3. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Redford, Douglas (2007). The Life and Ministry of Jesus: The Gospels. Standard Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7847-1900-8. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Reed, Jonathan L. (2002). Archaeology and the Galilean Jesus: a re-examination of the evidence. Continuum. ISBN 978-1-56338-394-6. Archived from the original on 4 May 2016. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Robinson, Neal (1991). Christ in Islam and Christianity. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 9780791405598.
  • Robinson, Neal (2005). «Jesus». In McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (ed.). Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. Brill. doi:10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00099.
  • Sanders, E. P. (1993). The Historical Figure of Jesus. Allen Lane Penguin Press. ISBN 978-0-14-192822-7. Archived from the original on 18 April 2017. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Stanton, Graham (2002). The Gospels and Jesus. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00802-0. Archived from the original on 26 February 2020. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  • Stegemann, Ekkehard (Basle) (2006). «Jesus». In Cancik, Hubert; Schneider, Helmuth (eds.). Brill’s New Pauly. doi:10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e522560.
  • Theissen, Gerd; Merz, Annette (1998). The Historical Jesus : a Comprehensive Guide. Fortress Press. ISBN 978-1-4514-0863-8. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Theissen, Gerd; Winter, Dagmar (2002). The Quest for the Plausible Jesus: The Question of Criteria. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-22537-7. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Twelftree, Graham H. (1999). Jesus the miracle worker: a historical & theological study. InterVarsity Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-0-8308-1596-8.
  • Van Voorst, Robert E (2000). Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8028-4368-5. Archived from the original on 19 August 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Vine, William E. (1940). Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words. Fleming H. Revell Company. ISBN 978-0-916441-31-9.
  • Vermes, Geza (1981). Jesus the Jew: A Historian’s Reading of the Gospels. Philadelphia: First Fortress. ISBN 978-0-8006-1443-0. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Vermes, Geza (2003). The Authentic Gospel of Jesus. London: Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-100360-3.
  • Walvoord, John F.; Zuck, Roy B. (1983). The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament. David C. Cook. ISBN 978-0-88207-812-0. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  • Wilson, Barrie A (2007). How Jesus Became Christian. New York: St.Martin’s Press. ISBN 978-0-679-31493-6.
  • Witherington, Ben (1997). The Jesus Quest: The Third Search for the Jew of Nazareth. InterVarsity Press. ISBN 978-0-8308-1544-9. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.

External links

This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 28 October 2013, and does not reflect subsequent edits.

  • Complete Sayings of Jesus Christ in parallel Latin and English

Понравилась статья? Поделить с друзьями:
  • Chris de burgh one word перевод
  • Chris de burgh one word straight to the heart
  • Chr vba excel таблица
  • Chose the right word what where when
  • Chose the right word to complete these sentences